Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

Limited Role of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) for Tumor Grade and Overall Survival in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

This study evaluated the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and tumor grades based on WHO, Adsay, and Kalimuthu classifications, using whole-mount pancreatectomy specimens. If glandular formation plays a key role in the degree of diffusion restriction, diffusion-weighted imaging could facilitate non-invasive grading of PDAC. A freehand region of interest (ROI) was drawn along tumor borders on the preoperative ADC map in each tumor-containing slice. Resection specimens were retrospectively graded according to WHO, Adsay, and Kalimuthu classifications and correlated with overall survival and the 10th percentile of whole-volume ADC values. Findings from 40 patients (23 male, median age 67) showed no correlation between ADC p10 values and WHO differentiation (p = 0.050), Adsay grade (p = 0.955), or Kalimuthu patterns (p = 0.117). There was no association between ADC p10 and overall survival (p = 0.082) and other clinicopathological variables. Survival was significantly lower for poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.046) and non-glandular Kalimuthu patterns (p = 0.016) and there was a trend towards inferior survival for Adsay G3 (p = 0.090) after correction for age, tumor location, and stage. Preoperative ADC measurements for determining PDAC aggressiveness had limited clinical utility, as there was no correlation with histological parameters or overall survival in resectable PDAC.

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic head cancer (NORPACT-1): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic head cancer (NORPACT-1): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas - technical considerations with analysis of surgical outcomes.

The aim of this study was to establish whether laparoscopic RAMPS (L-RAMPS) is a safe procedure with better oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) with splenectomy among patients with distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients who underwent L-RAMPS and LDP with splenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable PDAC of the body and tail. In this paper, we presented our technique of laparoscopic RAMPS and analyzed intraoperative and perioperative complications, oncological efficacy, and long-term survival. The study included 12 patients in the L-RAMPS group and 13 patients in the LDP with splenectomy. L-RAMPS was associated with significantly higher rates of R0 resection (91.7% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.027). There were no differences between the L-RAMPS and LDP with splenectomy groups in intraoperative blood loss (400 mL vs 400 mL, p = 0.783) and median operative time (250 min vs 220 min, p = 0.785). No differences were found in terms of perioperative complications, including the incidence of pancreatic fistula. Laparoscopic RAMPS is a feasible and safe procedure. It provides higher radicality as compared with LDP with splenectomy, without increasing the risk of complications. Further studies are necessary to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Literature Review and Our Experience of NAC-GS.

In addition to established evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), evidence of the effects of neoadjuvant treatments (NATs), including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, has also been accumulating. Recent results from prospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NATs may be beneficial not only for borderline resectable PDAC, but also for resectable PDAC, by increasing the likelihood of successful R0 resection, decreasing the likelihood of the development of lymph node metastasis, and improving recurrence-free and overall survival. In addition, response to NAT may be informative for predicting the clinical course after preoperative NAT followed by surgery; in this way, the postoperative treatment strategy can be revised based on the effect of NAT and the post-neoadjuvant therapy/surgery histopathological findings. On the other hand, the response to NAT and AC is also influenced by the tumor biology and the patient's immune/nutritional status; therefore, planning of the treatment strategy and meticulous management of NAT, surgery, and AC is required on a patient-by-patient basis. Our experience of using gemcitabine plus S-1 showed that this NAT regimen achieved tumor shrinkage and decreased the levels of tumor markers but failed to provide a survival benefit. Our results also suggested that response/adverse events to NAT may be predictive of the efficacy of AC, as well as survival outcomes.

The Value of Biological and Conditional Factors for Staging of Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Upfront Resection: A Nationwide Analysis

BackgroundNovel definitions suggest that resectability status for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) should be assessed beyond anatomical criteria, considering both biological and conditional factors. This has, however, yet to be validated on a nationwide scale. This study evaluated the prognostic value of biological and conditional factors for staging of patients with resectable PDAC.Patients and MethodsA nationwide observational cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients who underwent upfront resection of National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectable PDAC in the Netherlands (2014–2019) with complete information on preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. PDAC was considered biologically unfavorable (RB+) if CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL and favorable (RB−) otherwise. ECOG ≥ 2 was considered conditionally unfavorable (RC+) and favorable otherwise (RC−). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox-proportional hazard analysis, presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOverall, 688 patients were analyzed with a median overall survival (OS) of 20 months (95% CI 19–23). OS was 14 months (95% CI 10 months—median not reached) in 20 RB+C+ patients (3%; HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86–2.70), 13 months (95% CI 11–15) in 156 RB+C− patients (23%; HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.50–2.31), and 21 months (95% CI 12–41) in 47 RB−C+ patients (7%; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80–1.62) compared with 24 months (95% CI 22–27) in 465 patients with RB−C− PDAC (68%; reference).ConclusionsSurvival after upfront resection of anatomically resectable PDAC is worse in patients with CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL, while performance status had no impact. This supports consideration of CA19-9 in preoperative staging of resectable PDAC.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients with Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Background: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data examined the effect of NACRT followed by PD in elderly patients with PDAC. A total of 112 patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) PDAC, who were planned for PD and received NACRT between 2009 and 2022, were assessed. Changes induced by NACRT, surgical outcomes, nutritional status, renal and endocrine functions, and prognosis were compared between elderly (≥75 years, n = 43) and non-elderly (<75 years, n = 69) patients over two years following PD. Results: Completion and adverse event rates during NACRT, nutritional status, renal function, endocrine function over two years postoperatively, and prognosis did not significantly differ between the two groups. Low prognostic index after NACRT and the absence of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may be adverse prognostic indicators for elderly patients undergoing NACRT for R- and BR-PDAC. Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of postoperative complications, NACRT followed by PD can be safely performed in elderly patients, resulting in a prognosis similar to that in non-elderly patients.

Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 and Metabolite Hypotaurine Are Predictive Markers for Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

A significant number of patients experience early recurrence after surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), negating the benefit of surgery. The present study conducted clinicopathologic and metabolomic analyses to explore the factors associated with the early recurrence of PDAC. Patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC at Kagawa University Hospital between 2011 and 2020 were enrolled. Tissue samples of PDAC and nonneoplastic pancreas were collected and frozen immediately after resection. Charged metabolites were quantified by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. Patients who relapsed within 1 year were defined as the early recurrence group. Frozen tumor tissue and nonneoplastic pancreas were collected from 79 patients. The clinicopathologic analysis identified 11 predictive factors, including preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. The metabolomic analysis revealed that only hypotaurine was a significant risk factor for early recurrence. A multivariate analysis, including clinical and metabolic factors, showed that carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and hypotaurine were independent risk factors for early recurrence ( P = 0.045 and P = 0.049, respectively). The recurrence-free survival rate 1 year after surgery with both risk factors was only 25%. Our results suggested that tumor hypotaurine is a potential metabolite associated with early recurrence. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and hypotaurine showed a vital utility for predicting early recurrence.

Examining neoadjuvant treatment candidates in resectable pancreatic cancer based on tumor-vessel interactions and CA 19-9 levels: a retrospective cohort study.

The applicability of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has arisen, however, high-level evidence is lacking. This study aimed to explore patient subgroups with high-risk resectable PDAC for selecting candidates who may benefit from NAT. The 1132 patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with resectable PDAC without contact of major vessels (R-no contact) ( n =651), with contact of portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) ≤180° (R-contact) ( n =306), and borderline resectable PDAC without arterial involvement (BR-V) ( n =175) were analyzed. The mean age was 64.3±9.8 years, and 647 patients (57.2%) were male. The median follow-up was 26 months in the entire cohort. Patients with resectable PDAC without vascular contact had the most improved overall survival (OS) (median; 31.5 months). OS did not significantly differ between NAT and upfront surgery in the entire resectable PDAC cohort. However, in R-contact group, NAT showed significantly improved OS compared to upfront surgery (33 vs. 23 months). Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was showed a better OS than gemcitabine-based regimens in patients who underwent NAT (34 vs. 24 months). NAT was associated with a better survival in the patients with CA 19-9 level ≥150U/ml, only when the tumor has PV/SMV contact in resectable disease (40 vs. 19 months, P =0.001). NAT can be considered as an effective treatment in patients with resectable PDAC, particularly when the tumor is in contact with PV/SMV and CA 19-9 ≥150U/ml.

Tumor location, clinicopathological features, and perioperative and prognostic outcomes in patients who underwent pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study

Background/Objective: Preoperative treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is gaining popularity worldwide. However, the characteristics of tumors located in the pancreatic head (Ph), or those in the body or tail (Pbt), after surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinicopathological features, perioperative outcomes, and prognosis of patients with resectable PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection, focusing on distinguishing between Ph and Pbt PDACs. MethodsWe included 107 patients with resectable PDAC who underwent curative resection following NACRT between 2009 and 2023. Clinicopathological features, perioperative and prognostic outcomes, recurrence patterns, and prognoses were compared between Ph and Pbt PDAC groups. ResultsTumors were found in the Ph and Pbt in 64 and 43 patients, respectively. Albumin levels and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios after NACRT were significantly lower in the Ph group than in the Pbt group. The Pbt group showed significantly higher rates of positive peritoneal lavage cytology and serosal, arterial, and portal vein invasion than the Ph group did. Overall and recurrence-free survival were similar between the two groups. The most common site of initial postoperative recurrence was the lung only in both groups; however, the rate of peritoneal dissemination only was significantly higher in the Pbt group than in the Ph group. ConclusionsThe prognoses based on tumor locations in the Ph and Pbt after surgery following NACRT are similar. Following the resection of resectable Pbt PDAC, the possibility of peritoneal dissemination recurrence should be considered.

Neoadjuvant chemo- or chemo-radiation-therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma differentially shift ECM composition, complement activation, energy metabolism and ribosomal proteins of the residual tumor mass.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer, often diagnosed at stages that dis-qualify for surgical resection. Neoadjuvant therapies offer potential tumor regression and improved resectability. Although features of the tumor biology (e.g., molecular markers) may guide adjuvant therapy, biological alterations after neoadjuvant therapy remain largely unexplored. We performed mass spectrometry to characterize the proteomes of 67 PDAC resection specimens of patients who received either neoadjuvant chemo (NCT) or chemo-radiation (NCRT) therapy. We employed data-independent acquisition (DIA), yielding a proteome coverage in excess of 3500 proteins. Moreover, we successfully integrated two publicly available proteome datasets of treatment-naïve PDAC to unravel proteome alterations in response to neoadjuvant therapy, highlighting the feasibility of this approach. We found highly distinguishable proteome profiles. Treatment-naïve PDAC was characterized by enrichment of immunoglobulins, complement and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Post-NCT and post-NCRT PDAC presented high abundance of ribosomal and metabolic proteins as compared to treatment-naïve PDAC. Further analyses on patient survival and protein expression identified treatment-specific prognostic candidates. We present the first proteomic characterization of the residual PDAC mass after NCT and NCRT, and potential protein candidate markers associated with overall survival. We conclude that residual PDAC exhibits fundamentally different proteome profiles as compared to treatment-naïve PDAC, influenced by the type of neoadjuvant treatment. These findings may impact adjuvant or targeted therapy options.

Artificial intelligence for assessment of vascular involvement and tumor resectability on CT in patients with pancreatic cancer

ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic model using artificial intelligence (AI) for quantifying vascular involvement and classifying tumor resectability stage in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), primarily to support radiologists in referral centers. Resectability of PDAC is determined by the degree of vascular involvement on computed tomography scans (CTs), which is associated with considerable inter-observer variability.MethodsWe developed a semisupervised machine learning segmentation model to segment the PDAC and surrounding vasculature using 613 CTs of 467 patients with pancreatic tumors and 50 control patients. After segmenting the relevant structures, our model quantifies vascular involvement by measuring the degree of the vessel wall that is in contact with the tumor using AI-segmented CTs. Based on these measurements, the model classifies the resectability stage using the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria as either resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced (LA).ResultsWe evaluated the performance of the model using a test set containing 60 CTs from 60 patients, consisting of 20 resectable, 20 borderline resectable, and 20 locally advanced cases, by comparing the automated analysis obtained from the model to expert visual vascular involvement assessments. The model concurred with the radiologists on 227/300 (76%) vessels for determining vascular involvement. The model’s resectability classification agreed with the radiologists on 17/20 (85%) resectable, 16/20 (80%) for borderline resectable, and 15/20 (75%) for locally advanced cases.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that an AI model may allow automatic quantification of vascular involvement and classification of resectability for PDAC.Relevance statementThis AI model enables automated vascular involvement quantification and resectability classification for pancreatic cancer, aiding radiologists in treatment decisions, and potentially improving patient outcomes.Key points• High inter-observer variability exists in determining vascular involvement and resectability for PDAC.• Artificial intelligence accurately quantifies vascular involvement and classifies resectability for PDAC.• Artificial intelligence can aid radiologists by automating vascular involvement and resectability assessments.Graphical

Neoadjuvant radioimmunotherapy in pancreatic cancer enhances effector T cell infiltration and shortens their distances to tumor cells.

Radiotherapy is hypothesized to have an immune-modulating effect on the tumor microenvironment (TME) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to sensitize it to anti-PD-1 antibody (a-PD-1) treatment. We collected paired pre- and posttreatment specimens from a clinical trial evaluating combination treatment with GVAX vaccine, a-PD-1, and stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) following chemotherapy for locally advanced PDACs (LAPC). With resected PDACs following different neoadjuvant therapies as comparisons, effector cells in PDACs were found to skew toward a more exhausted status in LAPCs following chemotherapy. The combination of GVAX/a-PD-1/SBRT drives TME to favor antitumor immune response including increased densities of GZMB+CD8+ T cells, TH1, and TH17, which are associated with longer survival, however increases immunosuppressive M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Adding SBRT to GVAX/a-PD-1 shortens the distances from PD-1+CD8+ T cells to tumor cells and to PD-L1+ myeloid cells, which portends prolonged survival. These findings have guided the design of next radioimmunotherapy studies by targeting M2-like TAM in PDACs.

Stepwise Analysis of Resection Margin Impact on Survival and Distant Metastasis in Pancreatic Head Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

The prognostic role of tumor cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreatic head with direct microscopic infiltration (DMI) or in close proximity (≤1 mm) to the resection margin (RM) remains unclear. This single-center, retrospective study included specimens from 75 patients who underwent oncological resection of pancreatic head PDAC between February 2013 and July 2020. Two pathologists independently re-measured the distance between tumors and the multiple RMs. The impact of RM involvement for DMI, tumor cells within ≤1 mm, in general, and for individual RMs on overall survival (OS) and development of distant pulmonary (PM) and hepatic (HM) metastasis was analyzed. DMI of RMs was significantly associated with a shorter OS (median 5 vs 19 months, P = .02). The presence of tumor cells within ≤1 mm of RMs yielded a negative impact on OS with a trend toward significance (median 9 vs 21 months, P = .09). DMI and tumor cells within ≤1 mm of the pancreatic transection margin (PRM), individually, had a significant negative impact on OS (median 4 vs 19 months and 6 vs 19 months, P < .05), but not for any other individual RM. RM involvement of ≤1 mm of only the vascular circumferential resection margin (VCRM) resulted in a shorter time to HM development (P = 0.05). DMI of the posterior circumferential resection margin (PCRM) and VCRM, individually, showed shorter time to PM (P < .05). Potential clinical considerations include extended intraoperative evaluation of the PRM (1 mm) and intensified preoperative prediction of R1 resection as a basis for neoadjuvant therapy.

Surveillance after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: How to do it and what are the benefits?

Surveillance following resection with curative intent of pancreatic cancer varies widely, and supporting evidence is limited. Recurrence is although frequent, not at least during the first 2 years. Surveillance may be costly, but evidence on how this influences overall survival is not fully elucidated. There are reports implying that signs of biological recurrence (increasing CA 19-9) precede radiologically demonstrated recurrence by months. The possibility of initiating salvage therapy earlier is discussed, potentially based on improved future biomarker panels.

Assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer using novel immersive high-performance virtual reality rendering of abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

PurposeVirtual reality (VR) allows for an immersive and interactive analysis of imaging data such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to assess the comprehensibility of VR anatomy and its value in assessing resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).MethodsThis study assesses exposure to VR anatomy and evaluates the potential role of VR in assessing resectability of PDAC. Firstly, volumetric abdominal CT and MRI data were displayed in an immersive VR environment. Volunteering physicians were asked to identify anatomical landmarks in VR. In the second stage, experienced clinicians were asked to identify vascular involvement in a total of 12 CT and MRI scans displaying PDAC (2 resectable, 2 borderline resectable, and 2 locally advanced tumours per modality). Results were compared to 2D standard PACS viewing.ResultsIn VR visualisation of CT and MRI, the abdominal anatomical landmarks were recognised by all participants except the pancreas (30/34) in VR CT and the splenic (31/34) and common hepatic artery (18/34) in VR MRI, respectively. In VR CT, resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC were correctly identified in 22/24, 20/24 and 19/24 scans, respectively. Whereas, in VR MRI, resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC were correctly identified in 19/24, 19/24 and 21/24 scans, respectively. Interobserver agreement as measured by Fleiss κ was 0.7 for CT and 0.4 for MRI, respectively (p < 0.001). Scans were significantly assessed more accurately in VR CT than standard 2D PACS CT, with a median of 5.5 (IQR 4.75–6) and a median of 3 (IQR 2–3) correctly assessed out of 6 scans (p < 0.001).ConclusionVR enhanced visualisation of abdominal CT and MRI scan data provides intuitive handling and understanding of anatomy and might allow for more accurate staging of PDAC and could thus become a valuable adjunct in PDAC resectability assessment in the future.

The Molecular Twin artificial-intelligence platform integrates multi-omic data to predict outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.

Contemporary analyses focused on a limited number of clinical and molecular biomarkers have been unable to accurately predict clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Here we describe a precision medicine platform known as the Molecular Twin consisting of advanced machine-learning models and use it to analyze a dataset of 6,363 clinical and multi-omic molecular features from patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to accurately predict disease survival (DS). We show that a full multi-omic model predicts DS with the highest accuracy and that plasma protein is the top single-omic predictor of DS. A parsimonious model learning only 589 multi-omic features demonstrated similar predictive performance as the full multi-omic model. Our platform enables discovery of parsimonious biomarker panels and performance assessment of outcome prediction models learning from resource-intensive panels. This approach has considerable potential to impact clinical care and democratize precision cancer medicine worldwide.

Mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC) to predict pathologic treatment response (TR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) in resected-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDA).

690 Background: MUC5AC is a gel-forming glycoprotein that exists in two major glycoforms in PDA. We studied the differential expression and predictive value of heavily glycosylated mature MUC5AC (MM) detected in the apical (Ap) and/or extracellular region (EC) and less-glycosylated immature MUC5AC (IM) detected only in the cytoplasm (Cy) in R-PDA. Methods: R-PDA formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from January 2010 to June 2021 were obtained from the Ohio State University biorepository. Immunohistochemistry was performed to study the expression for MM and IM using monoclonal antibodies 45M1 and CLH2, respectively, and H-scores were calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Tissue samples from 100 R-PDA (43 received NAT and 57 had upfront surgery (UpS)) were available for testing. The median age of diagnosis was 65 years, and 50% were females. MM and IM were positive in 96% R-PDA (MM-95% Ap and 72% EC).In the NAT group, 89% (n=38) had 5-fluorouracil (5FU) based (36 FOLFIRINOX and 2 FOLFOX), and the rest received gemcitabine (Gem)-based therapy; patients received a median of 6 cycles of NAT; 37% (16) had preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) after NAT; 63% (27) had adjuvant systemic therapy (AST); pathologic objective response (OR = near complete or partial) and no response (NR) to NAT was reported in 63% (27) and 37% (16), respectively. In UpS group, 92% and 4% had AST (48 Gem-based, 4 5FU-based) and adjuvant CRT, respectively. The median time to recurrence (mTTR) and overall survival of the group was 15 and 33 months (m), respectively. NAT group had significantly (p&lt;0.05) lower EC-positive MM (mean H-score 108 vs. 151), IM (mean H-score 122 vs. 162), and mTTR (11 vs 15 m) than UpS group. IM levels were directly proportional to the response (near complete (mean H-score 98) &lt; partial (105) &lt; NR (152) &lt; UpS (162), p=0.04). Other TR results are discussed in the table. Conclusions: MUC5AC (IM &gt; MM) is a potential predictive marker for TR among PDA patients, specifically among those receiving FOLFIRINOX. These associations must be validated in further prospective studies.[Table: see text]

Socioeconomic variables in the National Cancer Database: Utilization and impact of income and education in survival models for patients with resected pancreas cancer.

607 Background: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is commonly used for analyzing survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer and has a robust number of patient-specific socioeconomic variables. Although these aggregated variables are commonly collected, their utility and impact on survival has infrequently been assessed. We aim to assess the distribution of income and education variables on their impact on survival models for patients who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: Patients undergoing definitive surgery for PDAC between 2004-2020 were identified from the NCDB. Variables of interest were income and education according to the patient’s ZIP code of residence. Pearson and Spearman correlation was assessed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan Meier method. The effects of income and education was calculated using Cox proportional Hazard (PH) models. Results: 69,362 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 66 (IQR 59-73), with 48.9% female. The correlation coefficient between income and education based on the 2020 American Community Survey data was 0.48 (p&lt;0.01). Median OS from the time of diagnosis was 21 months. The 5-year OS was 19.4 and 22.7 months for groups with lowest and highest education (p&lt;0.01). Group with missing education has a 5-year OS of 22.4 month, comparable to the group with highest education (p=0.82). The 5-year OS based on income quartiles was 18.7 and 22.5 months for the Q1 and Q4 (p&lt;0.01). Group with missing income has a 5-year OS of 22.4 month, similar to the highest income group (p=0.85). When including combinations of income, education and their interaction, the concordance of Cox models was changed by less than 0.002. Conclusions: For patients who underwent definitive surgery for PDAC, the income and education variables are only mildly correlated, and their inclusion do not have significant impact on OS models. Investigators should reconsider the utility of the aggregate NCDB measures, as they many not fully elucidate income and education disparities and impact on survival. [Table: see text]

Complete Primary Pathological Response Following Neoadjuvant Treatment and Radical Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for borderline (BD) or locally advanced (LA) primary pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is now a widely adopted approach. We present a case series of patients who have achieved a complete pathological response of the primary tumour on final histology following neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- chemoradiation and radical surgery. Patients who underwent radical pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant treatment between March 2006 and March 2023 at a single institution were identified by retrospective case note review of a prospectively maintained database. Ten patients were identified to have a complete primary pathological response (ypT0) on postoperative histology. Before treatment, five patients were considered BD and five were LA according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. All patients underwent staging Computed Tomography (CT) and nine underwent 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) imaging, with a mean maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary lesion at 6.14 ± 1.98 units. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and eight received further chemoradiotherapy prior to resection. Mean pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment serum Ca19-9 was 148.0 ± 146.3 IU/L and 18.0 ± 18.7 IU/L, respectively (p = 0.01). The mean duration of NAT was 5.6 ± 1.7 months. The mean time from completion of NAT to surgery was 13.1 ± 8.3 weeks. The mean lymph node yield was 21.1 ± 10.4 nodes, with one patient found to have 1 lymph node involved. All resections were reported to be R0. The mean length of stay was 11.8 ± 6.2 days. At the time of analysis, one death was reported at 35 months postoperatively. Two cases of recurrence were reported at 16 months (surgical bed) and 33 months (pulmonary). All other patients remain alive and under active surveillance. The current overall survival is 26.6 ± 20.7 months and counting. Complete primary pathological response is uncommon but possible following neoadjuvant treatment in patients with PDAC. Further work to identify the common denominator within this unique cohort may lead to advances in the therapeutic approach and offer hope for patients diagnosed with borderline or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

FOLFIRINOX plus high intensity focused ultrasound for locally advanced/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A prospective single arm phase II trial.

670 Background: FOLFIRINOX has been the standard regimen for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) for palliation and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) for neoadjuvant treatment. According to the results of animal studies, concurrent use of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and chemotherapy can enhance the drug delivery to the target tissue. In this phase II trial, we aimed to evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of FOLFIRINOX plus HIFU for patients with LAPC or BRPC. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective single center phase II trial (Study identifier: NCT05262452). We prospectively enrolled 60 patients (M:F=35:25; median age, 67.0 years old) with LAPC (n=23) or BRPC (n=37). The median tumor size was 4.0 cm (Interquartile range, 2.7-4.6). All patients were treated by FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85mg/m2 of body-surface area; irinotecan, 180mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 given as a bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 given as a 46-hour continuous infusion) every 2 weeks until disease progression. HIFU was combined in the first 4 cycles of chemotherapy with following parameters: intensity of 2.0 kw/cm2, duty cycle of 1%, exposure time of 3 seconds and PRF of 10Hz. Follow-up contrast enhanced CT was taken every 4 cycles for the response evaluation using response evaluation criteria for solid tumor 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. All analyses were intention-to-treat. Results: Two patients withdrew the consent, and two patients could not complete planned 4 cycles of FOLFIRINOX plus HIFU treatment owing to sepsis from severe neutropenia related to chemotherapy. Among 56 patients who completed the 4 cycle of FOLFIRINOX plus HIFU and continued chemotherapy, partial response was achieved in 36 patients (60.0%, 36/60), and stable disease in 20 patients. Regarding the adverse effect (AE), 32 of 60 patients experienced grade 3 (n=22) or grade 4 (n=10) AE, all of them were related to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. No AE related to HIFU was observed. The estimated OS was 94.8%, 75.9% and 67.6% at 6-, 12- and 18 months, respectively. Regarding the PFS, the 6-, 12- and 18-month PFS was 91.9%, 70.3% and 56.2%, respectively. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX plus HIFU was safe and effective treatment for LAPC/BRPC, providing 60.0% of partial response rate without any additional AE to chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT05262452 .