Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Research Articles

Futility of Up-Front Resection for Anatomically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

There are currently no clinically relevant criteria to predict a futile up-front pancreatectomy in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. To develop a futility risk model using a multi-institutional database and provide unified criteria associated with a futility likelihood below a safety threshold of 20%. This retrospective study took place from January 2010 through December 2021 at 5 high- or very high-volume centers in Italy. Data were analyzed during April 2024. Participants included consecutive patients undergoing up-front pancreatectomy at the participating institutions. Standard management, per existing guidelines. The main outcome measure was the rate of futile pancreatectomy, defined as an operation resulting in patient death or disease recurrence within 6 months. Dichotomous criteria were constructed to maintain the futility likelihood below 20%, corresponding to the chance of not receiving postneoadjuvant resection from existing pooled data. This study included 1426 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range, 62-75) years, 759 patients were male (53.2%), and 1076 had head cancer (75.4%). The rate of adjuvant treatment receipt was 73.7%. For the model construction, the study sample was split into a derivation (n = 885) and a validation cohort (n = 541). The rate of futile pancreatectomy was 18.9% (19.2% in the development and 18.6% in the validation cohort). Preoperative variables associated with futile resection were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (95% CI for coefficients, 0.68-0.87), cancer antigen (CA) 19.9 serum levels (95% CI, for coefficients 0.05-0.75), and tumor size (95% CI for coefficients, 0.28-0.46). Three risk groups associated with an escalating likelihood of futile resection, worse pathological features, and worse outcomes were identified. Four discrete conditions (defined as CA 19.9 levels-adjusted-to-size criteria: tumor size less than 2 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 1000 U/mL; tumor size less than 3 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 500 U/mL; tumor size less than 4 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 150 U/mL; and tumor size less than 5 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 50 U/mL) were associated with a futility likelihood below 20%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients fulfilling the criteria. In this study, a preoperative model (MetroPancreas) and dichotomous criteria to determine the risk of futile pancreatectomy were developed. This might help in selecting patients for up-front resection or neoadjuvant therapy.

Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Recurrence and Survival Following Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6 Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study investigated the correlation between positive resection margins and outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy according to the pivotal trial PRODIGE 24-CCTG PA-6. The primary focus is on elucidating the prognostic significance of specific resection margins, including those associated with the superior-mesenteric vein (SMV), medial, and posterior pancreas. The analysis involved 400 patients across multiple centers in France and Canada. Surgical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy were core interventions. This study assessed the prognostic impact of resection margins, highlighting the significance of standardized pathology assessments. Additionally, the influence of chemotherapy regimen choice, comparing gemcitabine to mFOLFIRINOX, on the implications of positive resection margins was examined. Only three margins, SMV (HR=1.48 95% CI [1.11;1.96], P<.001), medial (HR=1.92 95% CI [1.36;2.73], P<.001) and posterior (HR=1.65 95% CI [1.21;2.24], P=.002), had a significant prognostic impact on disease-free survival and were sufficient compared with the seven recommended margins (Kappa=0.90 95% CI [0.87; 0.94]). R1 status was significant independent prognostic factor for poorer survival in gemcitabine-treasted patients (HR=1.97 95% CI [1.23;3.16], P=.005) but lost its significance with mFOLFIRINOX (HR=1.46 95% CI [0.91;2.35], P=.114). All efforts should be made to evaluate the three margins of the highest prognostic value, with the others being secondary. A key finding of this study is the likely effect of mFOLFIRINOX on local invasion in operated patients, which seems to correct the impairment related to margin involvement, probably explaining the improvements in DFS and OS.

Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant treatment in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is standard for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). However, consensus is lacking on the optimal surgical timing for patients with BRPC undergoing NAT. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing NAT for BRPC and suggest optimal resection timing. Prospectively collected data for 282 patients with BRPC between January 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 164 patients who underwent NAT followed by surgery, 45 for chemotherapy only, and 73 for upfront surgery. Among them, 150 patients who underwent R0 or R1 resection following NAT were investigated to identify prognostic factors. Patients receiving NAT followed by surgery showed the best survival (median overall survival [OS]; NAT followed by surgery vs. upfront surgery vs. chemotherapy only; 35 vs. 23 vs. 16 months). In the NAT group, 54 (36.0%) patients received less than 3 months of NAT, 68 (45.3%) received ≥3, <6 months, and 28 (18.7%) received longer than 6 months. Patients receiving ≥3 months of NAT showed an improved OS compared to <3 months (median; not reached vs. 27 months). In the FOLFIRINOX group, patients who received more than eight FOLFIRINOX cycles showed a good prognosis (<6 vs. 6-7 vs. ≥8 cycles; median survival, 26 vs. 41 months vs. not-reached). However, >12 cycles did not carry a survival benefit compared to 8-11 cycles. The optimal resection timing following NAT is once a patient undergoes at least 3 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or at least eight FOLFIRINOX cycles.

Enhancing Neoadjuvant Virotherapy's Effectiveness by Targeting Stroma to Improve Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer.

About one-fourth of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are categorized as borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA). Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have not yielded the anticipated outcomes in curing patients with BR/LA PDAC. The surgical resection of these tumors presents challenges owing to the unpredictability of the resection margin, involvement of vasculature with the tumor, the likelihood of occult metastasis, a higher ratio of positive lymph nodes, and the relatively larger size of tumor nodules. Oncolytic virotherapy has shown promising activity in preclinical PDAC models. Unfortunately, the desmoplastic stroma within the PDAC tumor microenvironment establishes a barrier, hindering the infiltration of oncolytic viruses and various therapeutic drugs-such as antibodies, adoptive cell therapy agents, and chemotherapeutic agents-in reaching the tumor site. Recently, a growing emphasis has been placed on targeting major acellular components of tumor stroma, such as hyaluronic acid and collagen, to enhance drug penetration. Oncolytic viruses can be engineered to express proteolytic enzymes that cleave hyaluronic acid and collagen into smaller polypeptides, thereby softening the desmoplastic stroma, ultimately leading to increased viral distribution along with increased oncolysis and subsequent tumor size regression. This approach may offer new possibilities to improve the resectability of patients diagnosed with BR and LA PDAC.

Three Molecular Developmental Pathways of Remnant Pancreatic Cancer after Resection: A Nationwide Project Study of Japan Pancreas Society.

This study aimed to clarify the molecular mechanism of remnant pancreatic cancer (PC) development after primary PC resection. Molecular mechanisms of the development of remnant PCs following primary PC resection are largely unknown. Forty-three patients undergoing remnant PC resection after primary PC resection between 2001 and 2017 at 26 institutes were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological features and molecular alterations detected by targeted amplicon sequencing of 36 PC-associated genes were evaluated. These patients showed significantly lower body mass indices and higher hemoglobin A1c values at remnant PC resection than at primary PC resection. A comparison of the molecular features between primary and remnant PCs indicated that remnant PCs were likely to develop via three different molecular pathways: successional, showing identical and accumulated alterations (n=14); phylogenic, showing identical and distinct alterations (n=26); and distinct, showing independent distinctive alterations (n=3). The similarity of gene alterations was associated with time to the remnant PC development (r=－0.384, P=0.0173). Phylogenic pathways were significantly associated with the intraductal spread of carcinoma (P=0.007). Patient survival did not differ significantly depending on these molecular pathways. Molecular profiling uncovered three pathways for the development of remnant PCs, namely, successional, phylogenic, and distinct pathways. The vast majority of remnant PCs are likely to be molecularly associated with primary PCs either in the successional or phylogenic way. This information could impact the design of a strategy for monitoring and treating remnant PCs.

Oncological survival in pancreatic head ductal carcinoma: hybrid minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy - a single centre analysis.

Surgery remains the only curative treatment option for pancreatic head cancer. Laparoscopic surgical techniques are increasingly used, in line with the development of visceral surgery as a whole. The success of surgery is measured by the oncological outcome. Aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcome and survival after laparoscopic assisted resection of the pancreatic head compared to open surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma. Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of 182 laparoscopic pancreatic head resections for ductal carcinoma were compared with 585 open pancreatic head resections. The laparoscopic procedures were performed between 2010 and 2022, the open procedures between 2002 and 2022. Laparoscopic procedure was significantly superior in terms of intraoperative blood loss (575 vs. 600mL, P=0.021) and operative time (413 vs. 427 min, P=0.033). Tumour size (25 vs. 27mm, P=0.028), need for portal vein resection (P=0.009) and blood transfusion (P=0.004) were significantly greater in the open group (P=0.009). The resection margin remained negative significantly more often in the laparoscopic group (159 [87%] vs. 449 [77%], P<0.001). There was no difference in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Postoperative survival at 5 years was significantly better in the laparoscopic group (37% vs. 15%, P<0.001). In our cohort, patients who underwent hybrid laparoscopic resection of pancreatic head cancer showed a significantly improved oncological outcome. Most of these effects are due to selection bias, which is not captured by the clinical parameters used to date. Our results highlight the need for additional prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer.

Postoperative Adverse Events Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial (Alliance A021501).

Postoperative adverse events (AEs) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy in the national cooperative group setting have not been previously characterized. We conducted a preplanned secondary analysis of patients enrolled on the Alliance A021501 clinical trial to quantify perioperative AE rates. The A021501 phase 2 trial randomized patients with BR-PC to receive 8 doses of mFOLFIRINOX (Arm 1) or 7 doses of mFOLFIRINOX and hypofractionated radiotherapy (Arm 2), followed by pancreatectomy (December 31, 2016 to May 31, 2019). Adverse events were assessed 90 days after pancreatectomy. Of 126 enrolled patients, 51 (40%) underwent pancreatectomy (n = 32, Arm 1; n = 19, Arm 2) at 28 institutions. Five (10%) patients required reoperation within 90 days; 56% of patients (n = 27/48) experienced at least one grade 3 or higher AE (50% vs. 67%, p = 0.37). Ninety-day mortality was 2.0%. Readmission was less frequent in Arm 1 (16% vs. 42%, p = 0.05), but there were no differences between study arms in rates of reoperation (13% vs. 5%), pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage (9% vs. 16%), or wound infection (6% vs. 16%). Pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage was associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.012). No difference in overall survival was observed based on occurrence of postoperative AEs (hazard ratio = 1.1; 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.6). In this multicenter study, rates of postoperative AEs were consistent with those previously reported. Multimodality trials of preoperative therapy for BR-PC may be performed in the cooperative group setting with careful quality assurance and safety monitoring. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02839343.

Re-evaluation of risk and oncological outcomes of resection of veins and arteries in the resection of pancreatic cancer.

Advances in chemotherapy have led to increasing major vascular resection during pancreatectomy which has been contraindicated due to high morbidity. This study aimed to verify the safety and oncological outcomes of vascular resection during pancreatectomy in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Data from patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic cancer at Seoul National University Hospital between 2001 and 2021 were reviewed. Clinicopathological outcomes were analyzed according vessel resection. A propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to evaluate survival outcomes. Of 1596 patients, the proportion of those who underwent vascular resection increased from 9.2% to 23.4% over time divided into 5-year intervals. There were no differences in major complications (15.6% vs. 13.0%; p = .266) and 30-day mortality rate (0.3% vs. 0.6%; p = .837) between the vascular and nonvascular resection groups. After PSM, the vascular resection group demonstrated comparable survival outcome with the nonvascular resection group (5 year-survival-rate 20.4 vs. 23.7%; p = .194). Arterial resection yielded comparable survival outcome with nonvascular resection (5 year-survival-rate 38.1% vs. 23.7%; p = .138). Appropriate vascular resection-even arterial-is safe and effective in patients carefully selected for radical surgery in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal indication and method for vascular resection in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic model for resected borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The current AJCC 8th has been reported to have a poor ability to predict the prognosis in patients with resected borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and locally advanced pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study was aimed to develop an improved prognostic model by incorporating pathology and parameters of biologic response (BR). A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent curative-intent surgery following chemotherapy. We developed a modified ypT staging system and incorporated the BR, involving normalization of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and reduction in the maximum standardized uptake value simultaneously after chemotherapy. The prognostic performance of the current pathologic system, modified pathologic system, and newly developed system incorporating pathology and BR were compared. In this study, 171 patients underwent surgery following chemotherapy. The modified T stage, which unified ypT2 and ypT3, demonstrated improved prognostic performance than the current staging system (area under the curve: 0.706 vs. 0.661). Biologic unresponsiveness was an independent prognostic factor for worse survival (hazard ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.50-3.55, P<0.001). The modified pathology with BR system demonstrated the highest discriminative ability in predicting 5-year overall survival than the current pathologic system (area under the curve: 0.785 vs. 0.661, P=0.010) and modified pathologic staging system (area under the curve: 0.785 vs. 0.706, P=0.002). The prognostic model, incorporating modified ypT staging and elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and maximum standardized uptake value simultaneously, demonstrated improved results in predicting oncologic outcomes for patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Preoperative metabolic syndrome and prognosis after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study.

We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS), its individual components, and the number of metabolic risk factors on the prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) following pancreatectomy. MetS was defined as meeting any three of the following criteria: (1) waist circumference ≥85cm in men or ≥80cm in women; (2) triglycerides ≥150mg/dL or receiving drug treatment for elevated triglycerides; (3) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40mg/dL in men or <50mg/dL in women or receiving drug treatment for reduced HDL-C; (4) systolic blood pressure ≥130mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥85mmHg or receiving drug treatment for hypertension; and (5) fasting glucose, (FG) ≥100mg/dL or receiving drug treatment for elevated glucose. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by the Cox regression model. Six hundred and seven patients who underwent radical resection for PC were enrolled in this study. Among them, 352 patients presented with preoperative MetS. MetS was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) but not with shorter disease-free survival (DFS). The adjusted HR (95% CI) for the poor OS in patients with 3, 4, and 5 metabolic risk components (vs.≤2) were 1.32 (1.03-1.84), 1.64 (1.18-2.29), and 1.96 (1.27-3.04), respectively (p<0.05). Elevated FG emerged as a significant predictor for poor OS and DFS. This study highlights that preoperative MetS serves as a significant predictor for OS in patients with PC, with its predictive value escalating as the number of metabolic risk components increases.

Organ-specific variations in tumor marker dynamics in postoperative pancreatic cancer recurrence: Trends in lung and liver recurrence highlighting biological heterogeneity

Background/ObjectivesAlthough tumor recurrence after surgical resection in pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally considered incurable, it is well-accepted that clinical presentations and outcomes vary according to the recurrent sites (e.g., liver vs. lung recurrence), suggesting a possible biological inhomogeneity of PC recurrence. Understanding the behavior of biological factors, specifically tumor markers (TMs), at different recurrence sites may contribute to individualized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the dynamics of pre-recurrence TMs at liver and lung recurrence sites. MethodsPatients with isolated postoperative liver or lung recurrence as their first recurrence were enrolled. Starting from the recurrence date confirmed by imaging examinations, the values of TMs (carbohydrate antigen 19-9: CA19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were retrospectively evaluated 6 and 3 months before recurrence and at the time of recurrence. ResultsPatients with liver recurrence displayed a significant increase in CA19-9 and CEA levels from as early as 6 months before recurrence. Contrastingly, patients with lung recurrence demonstrated a significant elevation of CA19-9 levels starting from 3 months before recurrence, with no increase in CEA levels, even at the time of recurrence. The relative change in CA19-9 and CEA levels during each period were significantly lower in patients with lung recurrence. ConclusionsBoth TMs exhibited organ-specific variations in patients with postoperative PC recurrence. This disparity may reflect the biological heterogeneity of PC between recurrence patterns, thereby highlighting the importance of conducting postoperative follow-up with consideration of this fact.

Pancreatic cancer and sarcopenia: a narrative review of the current status.

Pancreatic cancer is still a difficult disease to treat, despite recent advances in surgical techniques and chemotherapeutic drugs. Its incidence continues to rise, as does the number of older patients. Sarcopenia is defined as a progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. Sarcopenia is present in approximately 40% in patients with pancreatic cancer. Sarcopenia is primarily diagnosed through imaging, and progress is being made in the development of automated methods and artificial intelligence, as well as biomarker research. Sarcopenia has been linked to a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. However, some studies suggest that sarcopenia is not always associated with a poor prognosis, depending on the resectability of pancreatic cancer and the nature of treatment, such as surgery or chemotherapy. Recent meta-analyses have found that sarcopenia is not linked to postoperative complications. It is still debated whether there is a link between sarcopenia and drug toxicity during chemotherapy. The relationship between sarcopenia and immunity has been investigated, but the mechanism is still unknown.

Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2): International Improvement and Validation Study.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used: Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer treatment

Background. In recent decades, immunotherapy has become a topical area of research in the complex treatment of oncological diseases. A significant achievement in the immunotherapy of oncological diseases was the discovery of immune checkpoint proteins, which are effective inhibitors of the immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for the treatment of certain gastrointestinal malignancies. However, the clinical efficacy of ICIs monotherapy remains low. To improve the outcome of treatment, numerous studies are conducted in which immunotherapy is combined with other standard methods of anticancer treatment. Radiation therapy (RT) may enhance the antitumor immune response when combined with ICIs and is worth considering when combined with immunotherapy. The effectiveness of the combined strategy is actively being investigated in clinical trials. Purpose – to highlight the latest achievements in the field of combined use of immunotherapy with ICIs and RT in malignant neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Materials and methods. Data searches for the review were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The data of works published in 2013-2023 were analyzed and systematized. Results and discussion. The rationality of the combination of RT and immunotherapy was substantiated. The results of the combined use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and immunotherapy with ICIs in patients with resectable esophageal cancer and combined treatment in patients with advanced disease are analyzed. The clinical results of the use of ICIs in combination with RT or CRT in patients with gastric cancer and the combination of ICIs and RT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are presented. The clinical effects of adding ICIs to neoadjuvant RT or CRT in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and the results of trials of a combined strategy in patients with advanced disease are characterized. The clinical efficacy of the combined approach in locally advanced rectal cancer, which is a routine area of RT application, and in metastatic disease is reviewed. The results of small studies of combined treatment involving patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are presented. Conclusions. Over the past decade, research in the field of immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors has increased significantly. Based on the synergistic effects of radiation therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, the combination of these therapeutic approaches is increasingly being tested in gastrointestinal cancer to improve treatment outcomes. Published studies have shown encouraging results with satisfactory toxicity. However, most clinical trials are retrospective, non-comparative phase I/II trials and are limited to a small number of patients. The results of these studies can serve as a basis for conducting multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes to confirm the effectiveness of combined therapy.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer.

Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion. Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively). Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Is More Better?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.

Multi-parametric atlas of the pre-metastatic liver for prediction of metastatic outcome in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

Metastasis occurs frequently after resection of pancreatic cancer (PaC). In this study, we hypothesized that multi-parametric analysis of pre-metastatic liver biopsies would classify patients according to their metastatic risk, timing and organ site. Liver biopsies obtained during pancreatectomy from 49 patients with localized PaC and 19 control patients with non-cancerous pancreatic lesions were analyzed, combining metabolomic, tissue and single-cell transcriptomics and multiplex imaging approaches. Patients were followed prospectively (median 3 years) and classified into four recurrence groups; early (<6 months after resection) or late (>6 months after resection) liver metastasis (LiM); extrahepatic metastasis (EHM); and disease-free survivors (no evidence of disease (NED)). Overall, PaC livers exhibited signs of augmented inflammation compared to controls. Enrichment of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), Ki-67 upregulation and decreased liver creatine significantly distinguished those with future metastasis from NED. Patients with future LiM were characterized by scant T cell lobular infiltration, less steatosis and higher levels of citrullinated H3 compared to patients who developed EHM, who had overexpression of interferon target genes (MX1 and NR1D1) and an increase of CD11B+ natural killer (NK) cells. Upregulation of sortilin-1 and prominent NETs, together with the lack of T cells and a reduction in CD11B+ NK cells, differentiated patients with early-onset LiM from those with late-onset LiM. Liver profiles of NED closely resembled those of controls. Using the above parameters, a machine-learning-based model was developed that successfully predicted the metastatic outcome at the time of surgery with 78% accuracy. Therefore, multi-parametric profiling of liver biopsies at the time of PaC diagnosis may determine metastatic risk and organotropism and guide clinical stratification for optimal treatment selection.

Protocol digest of a randomized phase III trial comparing S-1-based chemoradiotherapy with/without nivolumab for unresectable locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: JCOG1908E (PENETRATE).

Pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal disease with a 5-year survival proportion of <10%. Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer, but its efficacy is not sufficient. Induction of the synergistic effect of irradiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors can be an attractive strategy. An open-label randomized phase III trial has been conducted since October 2020 to confirm the superiority of nivolumab plus S-1-based chemoradiotherapy over S-1-based chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with UR-LA or BR pancreatic cancer. A total of 216 patients will be enrolled in 14 institutions within 3.5years. The primary endpoint of the safety run-in part is dose-limiting toxicity, and that of the phase III part is overall survival. This trial was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT2080225361 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2080225361).

Preoperative Surgical or Endoscopic Bile Duct Drainage in Pancreatic Cancer.

Patients with pancreatic cancer and obstructive jaundice routinely undergo endoscopic stent placement (ES). It is well known that ES causes bacterial contamination and infectious complications after pancreatic resection. To compare short-term outcomes and survival in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection after preoperative ES vs preoperative surgical drainage (SD) via T-tube insertion. Patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent SD or ES from 2016 to 2022 were identified from a prospective database. Outcome analyses included microbiological bile contamination, overall morbidity and assessment of the overall complication burden using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Overall survival was investigated by Kaplan‒Meier analysis. A total of 55 patients with SD were identified and matched with 110 ES patients. After the primary intervention, ES patients experienced more complications (ES: 17.3% vs. SD: 3.6%; P=0.013). The overall complication burden after pancreatic resection was higher in ES patients than in SD patients (CCI: 27.2 vs. 19.9; P=0.022). Additionally, bacterial contamination of the bile was more frequent in ES patients compared to SD individuals (94.3% vs. 7.1%; P<0.001) with similar bacteria in 83.3% of postoperative abdominal infections in ES patients. While overall survival did not differ between the two groups, patients with postinterventional complications after ES had an impaired survival compared to those without complications (11.3mo vs. 20.4mo; P=0.03). SD for obstructive jaundice in resectable pancreatic cancer is associated with a lower overall complication burden. Additionally, patients with complications after ES experience worse overall survival. These findings indicate to rethink our standards of treatment of obstructive jaundice in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Computed tomography-based vascular burden index as a predictor of vascular resection and pathological vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundDetermination of vessel resection in patients with pancreatectomy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. The recently introduced computed tomography-based vascular burden index presents a potential solution to this challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the model performance for the prediction of vascular resection and pathological invasion. MethodsPatients who underwent surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were included. Two independent reviewers measured the vascular tumour burden index around the adjacent artery (AVBI), and vein (VVBI). The area under the curve was compared to assess the predictive capacity of vascular burden index values and their changes for vascular resection and pathological vascular invasion. ResultsAmong 252 patients, 179 and 73 had borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, respectively. Concurrent vessel resection and pathological vascular invasion were observed in 121 (48.0 %) and 42 (16.6 %) patients, respectively. In all patients, the VVBI (area under the curve: 0.872) and AVBI (0.911) after neo-adjuvant therapy significantly predicted vessel resection. In patients with vascular resection, the VVBI after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (0.752) and delta value of the AVBI (0.706) demonstrated better performance for predicting pathological invasion of the resected vein. The regression of the AVBI and VVBI was an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio: 0.54, 95 % confidence interval: 0.34–0.85; P = 0.009) ConclusionsRegressed VVBI on serial computed tomography scans is useful for predicting vein resection and pathological venous invasion before surgery. The delta value of the AVBI may therefore be helpful for predicting pathological arterial invasion after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.