Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

1244P Association of tumor-draining lymph node metastatic patterns and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy effectiveness in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

1244P Association of tumor-draining lymph node metastatic patterns and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy effectiveness in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

1230P Association between early endpoints and survival outcomes in neoadjuvant treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multi-country retrospective study

1230P Association between early endpoints and survival outcomes in neoadjuvant treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A multi-country retrospective study

1236P ctDNA-Lung-Detect: Profiling of non-shedding ctDNA early stage resected non-small cell lung cancers

1236P ctDNA-Lung-Detect: Profiling of non-shedding ctDNA early stage resected non-small cell lung cancers

Social Vulnerability Index Is Associated With Major Morbidity After Lung Resection

BackgroundLittle is known about the prognostic impact of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection. MethodsPatients who underwent lung resection for stage IA-IIB NSCLC at a single institution between 2010 and 2021 were included in the study. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition of major morbidity, consisting of 14 postoperative events, was used. The SVI was determined by geocoding the permanent addresses of Illinois residents and using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calculator for a census-tract level SVI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between the SVI and major morbidity. Cut-point analysis was performed to determine the SVI cutoff that most strongly correlated with major morbidity. ResultsA total of 551 patients met inclusion criteria, and 65% (356 of 551) of these patients underwent lobectomy. The SVI cutoff was determined to be 0.831 (P = .010). In the high-SVI cohort , 58% (26 of 45) were Black, compared with 9% (45 of 506) in the low-SVI cohort (P < .001). For high-SVI patients, the major morbidity rate was 27% vs 9% for low-SVI patients (P = .0174), and the 1-year mortality rate was 8.9% vs. 3.0% for those with a low SVI (P = .061). On univariate analysis, high SVI status was associated with 30-day major morbidity (odds ratio, 2.84; CI, 1.28-6.29; P = .010). On multivariate analysis, after controlling for age, race, sex, tumor histologic type, procedure type, preoperative comorbidities, smoking history, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, this association persisted (odds ratio, 3.16; CI, 1.11-8.99; P = .031). ConclusionsA high SVI is associated with major morbidity after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection for NSCLC.

1225P Perioperative serplulimab and chemotherapy in patients with resectable squamous non-small cell lung cancer: An open-label, single-arm, phase II trial

1225P Perioperative serplulimab and chemotherapy in patients with resectable squamous non-small cell lung cancer: An open-label, single-arm, phase II trial

Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Recurrence in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are the most common targetable gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Japan, approximately 40% of patients who undergo surgical resection for non-squamous NSCLC have EGFR mutations. However, no long-term studies have been conducted including a large number of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with postoperative recurrence (PR). We conducted a retrospective observational study of the data of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with PR who had undergone surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between October 2002 and November 2017. We evaluated post-recurrence overall survival (PRS) and postoperative overall survival (POS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and identify any associations between the clinical variables at recurrence and PRS using univariate and multivariate analysis. We enrolled 162 patients. The median observation time for PRS was 4.95 years (range, 0.82-13.25) and POS was 5.81 years (range, 2.84-16.71). The median PRS was 5.17 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.90-5.61) and POS was 7.07 years (95% CI, 5.88-8.01). Univariate analysis identified male sex (median PRS: 3.32 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05), bone metastasis (median PRS: 2.43 vs. 5.33 years; p < 0.05), and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (median PRS: 3.05 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05) and multivariate analysis identified bone metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.28; p < 0.05) and CNS metastasis (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.98; p < 0.05) as poor prognostic factors. The pattern of recurrence (oligo vs. non-oligo recurrence) was not a prognostic factor. Logistic regression analysis revealed the association between sex and the presence bone/CNS metastasis at recurrence. Our data may help visualize future prospects and determine the timing of osimertinib initiation. New treatment strategies need to be developed for patients with bone/CNS metastasis at the first recurrence.

A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Opnurasib KRAS G12C Inhibitor in Patients With Surgically Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (CCTG IND.242A): A Substudy of the IND.242 Platform Master Protocol

Molecularly targeted agents are increasingly being studied in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to try and improve cure. However, phase 3 data on neoadjuvant therapy have largely been conducted in a biomarker agnostic manner with inconsistent exclusion of EGFR and ALK alterations. Our objective was to develop IND.242 as a large-scale neoadjuvant platform trial to introduce novel agents into the preoperative window for molecularly-defined NSCLC patient populations. Given that KRAS G12C mutations are common in the overall NSCLC patient population, ranging from 9.4% to 13% of cases across different cohorts, and may be associated to worse prognosis, the initial IND.242A Substudy was designed to test neoadjuvant JDQ443 (opnurasib), a selective KRAS G12C inhibitor. This current trial report describes the multicenter, Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG)-led IND.242 neoadjuvant phase 2 platform master protocol and its first Substudy (IND.242A) of neoadjuvant opnurasib KRAS G12C inhibitor for patients with surgically resectable NSCLC (AJCC 8th edition stage IA2 to IIIA). In IND.242A, a maximum of 27 patients will be accrued in participating Canadian sites. The primary objective is the rate of major pathological response (MPR) following neoadjuvant opnurasib. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability of the treatment regimen, objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 for the neoadjuvant treatment period, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years, and surgical outcomes. Exploratory objectives are to explore patient related outcomes (PROs) and identify potential predictive biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance on tissue and peripheral blood samples.

Tislelizumab synergizes with surgery to augment the survival benefit in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesThis retrospective study evaluated the individual benefits of tislelizumab and surgery, as well as their synergistic effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsFrom September 2019 to June 2022, all participants with potentially resectable NSCLC who received chemotherapy (C) or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (T) were included in the study. Participants were categorized into four groups based on surgery or not (S or NS) and the utilization of tislelizumab (T or C). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsCompared to C, T was associated with significantly higher objective response rate (64.54% vs. 34.78%, p = 0.003), higher pathological complete response rate (40.00% vs. 14.06%, p = 0.007), and higher major pathological response rate (60.00% vs. 20.31%, p < 0.001). The T + S group exhibited a proportionately higher reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared to the sum of the T + NS group and C + S group. Regardless of C or T, surgery was associated with improved OS (p < 0.01). Without surgery, T did not show significant improvement in PFS or OS. However, with surgery, T significantly improved both PFS and OS (ps < 0.01).ConclusionTislelizumab with subsequent surgery synergistically improves the survival benefits in patients with NSCLC.

Comprehensive Analysis of Immune Responses to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about which patients are likely to benefit most from neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this study, we performed a multiplatform analysis on samples from resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy to explore molecular characteristics related to immune responses. A total of 17 patients with resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy were included. A multiplex cytokine assay, bulk TCR sequencing in peripheral blood, and multiplexed immunohistochemistry were performed. Low levels of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1alpha at baseline were associated with unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with major pathologic response (MPR) showed a decrease in HGF after one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. An increase in IDO and IP-10 was observed in patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. There were no correlations between irAEs and MPR or DFS. The MPR group presented a significant decrease in white blood cells and neutrophil count after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The high peripheral baseline TCR convergence was correlated with MPR and favorable DFS in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy led to a significant increase in CD4+, CD8+, and CD8+CD39+ T-cell infiltration in tumor areas. This study suggests the potential roles of cytokines and TCR convergence for predicting ICIs response in resectable NSCLC and LUSC. CD8+CD39+T cells and CD4+ T cells could be involved in the action of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of recurrence and metastasis of different surgical techniques for non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionLung cancer remains the primary cause of cancer-related deaths on a global scale. Surgery is the main therapeutic option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal surgical approach...

Targeting ALK receptors in non-small cell lung cancer: what is the road ahead?

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene-rearrangements are identified in about 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), and ALK-rearranged NSCLC is to be considered an oncogene-addicted cancer with peculiar clinical characteristics. Several ALK inhibitors have been studied and approved for use in the treatment of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC with reported superiority in terms of efficacy and safety profile compared with chemotherapy. Second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) offer to NSCLC patients a clinically meaningful prolongment of survival with a very good quality of life profile. However, resistances to these agents always occur, with less satisfying options for second-line treatments. Direct comparisons among these agents are not available, and the choice among brigatinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib as first-line treatment remains challenging. Very recently, alectinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy also in resected stage IB-IIIA ALK-rearranged NSCLC, extending the clinical benefit offered by ALK inhibitors also to the adjuvant setting. Future development of ALK inhibitors in NSCLC treatment includes the search for optimal management of acquired resistance to first-line treatments and the extension of use of ALK inhibitors also to neoadjuvant and preferably to perioperative setting.

Preliminary analysis of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

200 Background: The benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for resectable NSCLC suggest that this combined treatment may provide more surgical opportunities and survival benefits for potentially resectable locally advanced NSCLC. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 28 patients with stage III EGFR/ALK/ROS wild-type NSCLC. Eligible patients received 2-8 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (squamous carcinoma: PD-1 inhibitor combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin/carboplatin; adenocarcinoma: PD-1 inhibitor combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin), followed by re-evaluation for surgery. Afterwards, patients underwent surgery after downstaging, with some receiving adjuvant immunotherapy maintenance for one year. Primary endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: All 28 patients were male, with 7 (25%) in stage IIIA, 10 (35.7%) in IIIB, 4 (14.3%) in IIIC, 2 (7.14%) in IVA, and 2 (7.14%) in IVB. There were 22 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 4 of adenocarcinoma, 1 of large cell lung cancer, and 1 of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. 23 patients (82.1%) completed neoadjuvant treatment and underwent resection, achieving 100% R0 resection rate (23/23); 5 patients did not undergo surgery, 3 of whom received combined radiochemotherapy due to disease progression, 1 delayed surgery due to immunotherapy associated myocardial damage, and 1 died from massive hemoptysis and hemorrhagic shock. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60.7%, 95%CI [40.6-78.5%] and the disease control rate (DCR) was 85.7%, 95%CI [67.3-96.0%]. Among the 23 patients who underwent surgery, the pCR was 60.9%, 95%CI [38.5-80.3%], MPR was 4.3%, 95%CI [0.1-21.9%], clinical downstaging rate was 50%, 95%CI [30.6-69.4%] and pathological downstaging rate was 86.9%, 95%CI [66.4-97.2%]. 17 patients (77.3%) underwent lobectomy, and 5 (22.7%) underwent bilobectomy with a median blood loss of 100 ml, IQR [55.0-100]. There were no surgery-related deaths. Postoperatively, one patient developed chylothorax, one had a lung infection, and the two improved after conservative treatment. 11 patients (47.8%) received post-surgery immunotherapy maintenance, and 2 of them (8.7%) developed immune-related pneumonia. As of April 7, 2024, the median follow-up time was 21.5 months (95%CI: 17-34 Mo), At 12 months。 PFS rate was 82.1% (95%CI: 69.1-97.6%); OS rate was 96.3% (95%CI: 89.4-100%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with surgery for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC may benefit patients and significantly extend survival.

Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a matched-pair study

BackgroundReports from case series suggest that operative outcomes are comparable amongst different age groups following surgery with curative intent for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to compare morbidity and mortality after NSCLC surgery in older patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) and identify independent predictive risk factors.MethodsWe identified 2015 patients with postoperative stages IA to IIIA according to AJCC/UICC 7th edition who had undergone NSCLC surgery with curative intent at a single specialized lung cancer center from January 2010 to December 2015. A matched-pair analysis was performed on 227 older patients and corresponding 227 younger patients. Short-term surgical outcomes were postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality. Long-term operative outcomes were disease-free and overall survival.Results454 patients were included in the matched-pair analysis. 36% of younger patients developed postoperative complications versus 42% in older patients (p = 0.163). Age was not significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days in older patients and 13 days in younger patients (p = 0.185). 90-day mortality was 2.2% in younger patients compared to 4% in older patients (p = 0.424). In patients aged 75 and older impaired performance status (ECOG ≥ 1) was associated with decreased overall survival (HR = 2.15, CI 1.34–3.46), as were preoperative serum C-reactive protein / albumin ratio ≥ 0.3 (HR = 1.95, CI 1.23–3.11) and elevated preoperative serum creatinine levels ≥ 1.1 mg/dl (HR = 1.84, CI 1.15–2.95). In the younger cohort male sex (HR = 2.26, CI 1.17–4.36), postoperative stage III disease (HR 4.61, CI 2.23–9.54) and preoperative anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dl) (HR 2.09, CI 1.10–3.96) were associated with decreased overall survival.ConclusionsLung resection for NSCLC in older patients is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality comparable to those of younger patients. In older patients, physical activity, comorbidities and nutritional status are related to survival and should influence the indication for surgery rather than age alone.

Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: New Challenges with Immune Checkpoint Blockers and Targeted Therapies.

The recent advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically modified treatment strategies by improving the prognosis in this setting. Osimertinib and alectinib, both TKIs, have shown significant improvements in outcomes for patients with resected EGFR- and ALK-positive NSCLC, respectively, changing the standard of care in these subgroups. More recently, the LAURA trial showed the efficacy of osimertinib after chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Numerous trials are still ongoing to investigate neoadjuvant/perioperative TKIs in several oncogene-driven NSCLC. In addition, several ICBs have been tested and approved as adjuvant (atezolizumab and pembrolizumab), neoadjuvant (nivolumab), and perioperative treatments (pembrolizumab) for patients with resectable early-stage NSCLC. Despite these advances, many challenges remain regarding the use of TKIs and ICBs in this setting, including the optimal duration of adjuvant TKI or induction ICB therapy, the role of minimal residual disease to identify patients at high-risk of disease relapse and to guide adjuvant treatment decisions, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected oncogene-driven NSCLC. Furthermore, potential predictive biomarkers for efficacy are needed to eventually intensify the entire perioperative strategies. This review aims to summarize and discuss the available evidence, the ongoing trials, and the challenges associated with TKI- and ICB-based approaches in early-stage NSCLC.

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and New Standard of Care

Immunotherapy has drastically changed the treatment of lung cancer not only in systemic disease but also in the perioperative setting in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In particular, the neoadjuvant and perioperative therapy regimes of the CheckMate 816 and KEYNOTE-671 studies as well as the adjuvant therapy according to the IMPower010 and the PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 protocols have already been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of selected cases. Other therapy protocols and combination therapies with varying drug classes and therapy modalities are currently being examined for their effectiveness and tolerance. The new treatment landscape creates new opportunities but also challenges for the treating disciplines. This article will focus on the current evidence for perioperative immunotherapy for resectable lung cancer and the resulting therapy standards, especially with regard to patient selection for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy, as well as current research efforts.

Five-year follow-up of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab) in non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundNeoadjuvant anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy exhibits potential in treating resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previously, we have reported the 3-year clinical outcomes of this trial, implying the...

Increased lung cancer recurrence following transthoracic needle biopsy.

Computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TNB) could damage lung structures and may disseminate tumor cells into the airway, blood vessels, and pleural cavity, affecting post-operative outcomes. Several studies have investigated the effects of TNB on the prognosis of patients, but the effects remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether TNB increases the risk of recurrence of resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this retrospective study, we enrolled 1,077 patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent curative resection from 2010 to 2020. Recurrence risk factors were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. A multiple logistic regression model, including age, sex, smoking history, total tumor size, invasive tumor size, histology, histologic differentiation, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and the number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), was used to calculate the propensity score. According to the pre-operative TNB, patients were classified into the no-TNB (n=823) and TNB (n=190) groups. After propensity score matching analysis, 380 patients were included in the no-TNB group (1:2 matching). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that pre-operative TNB was a negative prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected stage IA NSCLC [hazard ratio (HR), 3.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-6.67; P=0.003]. The 5-year locoregional and overall recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly lower in the TNB group than in the no-TNB group (88.3% vs. 96.8%, P=0.001; and 84.2% vs. 93.7%, P=0.02, respectively). For patients with stage IA NSCLC, pre-operative TNB was a negative prognostic factor for recurrence. Surgical diagnosis and treatment without pre-operative tissue diagnosis may be considered first in patients with clinically early lung cancer.

Recurrence-free survival after curative resection of non-small cell lung cancer between inhalational gas anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (GAS TIVA trial): protocol description

BackgroundSurgery is the primary treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but microscopic residual disease may be unavoidable. Preclinical studies have shown that volatile anesthetics might suppress host immunity and promote a pro-malignant environment that supports cancer cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis, whereas propofol may preserve cell-mediated immunity and inhibit tumor angiogenesis. However, clinical evidence that propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) can reduce tumor recurrence after curative resection remains inconsistent due to the retrospective observational nature of previous studies. Therefore, we will test the hypothesis that the recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of NSCLC is higher in patients who received TIVA than volatile anesthetics (GAS) in this multicenter randomized trial.MethodsThis double-blind, randomized trial will enroll patients at 22 international sites, subject to study registration, institutional review board approval, and patient written informed consent. Eligible patients are adult patients undergoing lung resection surgery with curative intent for NSCLC. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to study drugs, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or higher, or preexisting distant metastasis or malignant tumor in other organs. At each study site, enrolled subjects will be randomly allocated into the TIVA and GAS groups with a 1:1 ratio. This pragmatic trial does not standardize any aspect of patient care. However, potential confounders will be balanced between the study arms. The primary outcome will be RFS. Secondary outcomes will be overall survival and complications within postoperative 7 days. Enrollment of 5384 patients will provide 80% power to detect a 3% treatment effect (hazard ratio of 0.83) at alpha 0.05 for RFS at 3 years.DiscussionConfirmation of the study hypothesis would demonstrate that a relatively minor and low-cost alteration in anesthetic management has the potential to reduce cancer recurrence risk in NSCLC, an ultimately fatal complication. Rejection of the hypothesis would end the ongoing debate about the relationship between cancer recurrence and anesthetic management.Trial registrationThe study protocol was prospectively registered at the Clinical trials (https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06330038, principal investigator: Hyun Joo Ahn; date of first public release: March 25, 2024) before the recruitment of the first participant.

Neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus targeted combined with chemotherapy for resectable EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective controlled real-world study.

This study aimed to assess the role and effect of neoadjuvant targeted therapy (TT) versus targeted combined with chemotherapy (TC) for resectable EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Between March 2021 and June 2023, 20 patients with stage IA3-IIIB NSCLC were enrolled in the study. Eleven patients received EGFR-TKIs in the TT group, while nine patients received EGFR-TKIs and two cycles of cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (TC group). We compare the differences between the two groups through the following variables, including age, sex, surgical approach, postoperative complications, neoadjuvant therapy adverse events, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), objective response rate (ORR), major pathologic response (MPR), and pathologic complete response (pCR). Patients were predominantly female (75%) and never-smokers (95%). The average age was 59.2 years (range 46-79 years). Fifty-five percent harbored an exon 19 EGFR mutation and 45% an exon 21 mutation. The average targeted drug dosing time was 2.91 ± 1.7 (range 1-6) months in the TT group and 3.56 ± 3.54 (range 1-12) months in the TC group (P=0.598). The most common side effects were rash and diarrhea. No grade 5 events with neoadjuvant therapy were observed. The rate of R0 resection was 100% in all patients. Among the 11 patients in the TT group, 6 achieved a PR and 5 had SD, resulting in an ORR of 54.5%. Among the 9 patients in the TC group, 6 had PR and the remaining 3 had SD, resulting in an ORR of 66.6%. one patient (11.1%) in the TC group achieved pCR, while no patients in the TT group achieved pCR (P = 0.142). Two patients (18.2%) in the TT group reached MPR, and 2 patients (22.2%) in the TC group reached MPR (P = 0.257). The overall clinical downstage rate is 60%. Only 9 (45%) cases of yield clinical TNM (ycTNM) were consistent with yield pathologic TNM (ypTNM). Results from this retrospective controlled research indicate that the neoadjuvant TT group is likely to be more effective outcomes and has safer profile in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC than the neoadjuvant TC group. However, our results need to be validated in a multicenter, large sample prospective study.

Robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: the RVlob randomized controlled trial

The long-term survival and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) and video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were found to be comparable in retrospective studies, but they have not been investigated in a randomized trial setting. We conducted the RVlob trial to investigate if RAL was non-inferior to VAL in patients with resectable NSCLC. In this single-center, open-label, and parallel-arm randomized controlled trial conducted in Ruijin Hospital (Shanghai, China) between May 2017 and May 2020, we randomly assigned patients with resectable NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either RAL or VAL. One of the primary endpoints was 3-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints included 3-year disease-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to calculate overall survival and disease-free survival at 3 years. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03134534. A total of 320 patients were randomized to receive RAL (n=157) or VAL (n=163). The baseline characteristics of patients were well balanced between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 58.0 months, the 3-year overall survival was 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.0-98.3) in the RAL group and 91.5% (95% CI, 87.2-96.0) in the VAL group (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33-1.28; P=0.21); noninferiority of RAL was confirmed according to the predefined margin of-5% (absolute difference, 2.96%; a one-sided 90% CI,-1.39% to ∞; P=0.0029 for noninferiority). The 3-year disease-free survival was 88.7% (95% CI, 83.6-94.1) in the RAL group and 85.4% (95% CI, 80.0-91.2) in the VAL group (HR for disease recurrence or death, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.50-1.52; P=0.62). This study is the first randomized trial to show that RAL resulted in non-inferior overall survival compared with VAL in patients with resectable NSCLC. Based on our results, RAL is an equally oncologically effective treatment and can be considered as an alternative to VAL for resectable NSCLC. National Natural Science Foundation of China (82072557), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2500900), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant (20172005, the 2nd round of disbursement), program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20XD1402300), Novel Interdisciplinary Research Project from Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2022JC023), and Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2023ZD04).