Resectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction Research Articles

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement in the palliative management of malignant obstructive jaundice: initial experience in a tertiary center in Ghana.

Introductionone of the mainstays of management of malignant biliary obstruction is the decompression of the biliary system and its associated obstructive symptoms. Non-surgical palliative treatment such as percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting is desirable in many selected patients. However, this service is often not available in many resource-limited countries. We share our initial experience of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting for the management of malignant biliary obstruction in our first set of patients with surgically non resectable malignant biliary obstruction in Ghana.Methodspercutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting was performed on the first 23 consecutive patients at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. The procedure served as the first palliation for malignant obstruction through interventional radiology. Medical records as well as serum levels of total bilirubin (TBil), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were used to assess the efficiency of the intervention. Microsoft Excel 2010 was used to analysis the data.Resultsmost patients had resolution of jaundice with marked improvement in liver function and resolution of the itching associated with obstructive jaundice. During the follow-up of cases, one major complication of hemoperitoneum occurred requiring laparotomy. No other major complications such as bile leakage or death occurred. Four (4) patients had sepsis, which was managed.Conclusionthe introduction of the intervention in Ghana has proven to valuable for palliative drainage and relief of obstructive symptoms, hence contributing to better patient management. It is relatively safe with minor complications among Ghanaians with non-resectable obstructive symptoms.

Modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stent versus plastic stent for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with resectable malignant biliary obstruction.

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) may be better than plastic stents (PS) for preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) to relieve cholangitis or jaundice for resectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, modification of current FCSEMS designed originally for nonresectable MBO is needed to be a proper stent for PBD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible superiority of non-flared modified FCSEMS (M-FCSEMS) with 12-mm diameter and waist of central portion over PS in patients with resectable MBO. Eighty-five consecutive patients underwent PBD followed by operation from August 2015 to December 2017. In each M-FCSEMS and PS group, 29 patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative albumin and bilirubin levels. The overall technical success rates of PBD using M-FCSEMS and PS were 100%. The time to operation was similar between groups (18.6±10.8 vs 19.3±11.6days, respectively; P=0.843). The prevalence of PBD-related adverse events (AEs) was 6.9% (2/29) in the M-FCSEMS group versus 27.6% (8/29) in the PS group (P=0.037). Re-intervention before operation was required in 20.7% (6/29) of patients in the PS group but no patients in the M-FCSEMS group (P=0.023). No differences were found between perioperative AEs in the M-FCSEMS and PS groups (27.5% vs 31.0%, respectively; P=0.773). Modified FCSEMS led to lower PBD-related AEs, re-intervention rate, and comparable perioperative AEs compared with PS. M-FCSEMS may be a potential novel stent for PBD in patients with resectable MBO.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Rendezvous Technique for Failed Biliary Cannulation in Benign and Resectable Malignant Biliary Disorders.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique (EUS-RV) has emerged as an effective salvage method for unsuccessful biliary cannulation. However, its application for benign and resectable malignant biliary disorders has not been fully evaluated. To assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-RV for benign and resectable malignant biliary disorders. This was a multicenter prospective study from 12 Japanese referral centers. Patients who underwent EUS-RV after failed biliary cannulation for biliary disorder were candidates for this study. Inclusion criteria were unsuccessful biliary cannulation for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with benign and potentially resectable malignant biliary obstruction. Exclusion criteria included unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, inaccessible papillae due to surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy or duodenal stricture, and previous sphincterotomy and/or biliary stent placement. The primary outcome was the technical success rate of biliary cannulation; procedure time, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were secondary outcomes. Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled. The overall technical success rate and median procedure time were 85% and 33min, respectively. Guidewire manipulation using a 4-Fr tapered tip catheter contributed to the success in advancing the guidewire into the duodenum. Adverse events were identified in 15% patients, including 2 with biliary peritonitis and 1 mild pancreatitis. EUS-RV did not affect surgical maneuvers or complications associated with surgery, or postoperative course. EUS-RV may be a safe and feasible salvage method for unsuccessful biliary cannulation for benign or resectable malignant biliary disorders. Use of a 4-Fr tapered tip catheter may improve the overall EUS-RV success rate.

ERCP in potentially resectable malignant biliary obstruction is frequently unsuccessful when performed outside of a comprehensive pancreaticobiliary center.

ERCP prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy is unnecessary in select patients. When performed, it should be in conjunction with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to increase diagnostic sensitivity and allow for metal stent placement. The aim of this study was to determine differences in endoscopic practice patterns at community medical centers (CMC) and a comprehensive pancreaticobiliary referral center (PBRC). Retrospective cohort study of all patients seen at a PBRC for endoscopic and/or surgical management of potentially resectable malignant distal biliary obstruction from 1/2011 to 6/2014. Of 75 patients, 30 underwent endoscopic management at a CMC and 45 were initially managed at our PBRC. ERCP was attempted in 92% of patients. EUS was performed more frequently (100% vs. 13.3 %, P < 0.0001), ERCP was more successful (93% vs. 69%, P = 0.02), and metal stent placement more likely (41% vs. 5%, P = 0.005) at our PBRC compared to a CMC. The majority (81%) of patients undergoing initial endoscopy at a CMC required repeat endoscopy at our PBRC. Patients who are candidates for pancreaticoduodenectomy frequently undergo ERCP. At a CMC, ERCP is often unsuccessful, is rarely accompanied by EUS, and often requires repeat endoscopy. Our findings support regionalizing the management of suspected pancreatic malignancy into dedicated specialty centers. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:647-651. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Su1767 ERCP in Potentially Resectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction Remains Common and Is Associated With Frequent Failed Procedures When Performed Outside of an Academic Medical Center

Su1767 ERCP in Potentially Resectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction Remains Common and Is Associated With Frequent Failed Procedures When Performed Outside of an Academic Medical Center

Biliary stenting: Indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline

This article is part of a combined publication that expresses the current view of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy about endoscopic biliary stenting. The present Clinical Guideline describes short-term and long-term results of biliary stenting depending on indications and stent models; it makes recommendations on when, how, and with which stent to perform biliary drainage in most common clinical settings, including in patients with a potentially resectable malignant biliary obstruction and in those who require palliative drainage of common bile duct or hilar strictures. Treatment of benign conditions (strictures related to chronic pancreatitis, liver transplantation, or cholecystectomy, and leaks and failed biliary stone extraction) and management of complications (including stent revision) are also discussed. A two-page executive summary of evidence statements and recommendations is provided. A separate Technology Review describes the models of biliary stents available and the stenting techniques, including advanced techniques such as insertion of multiple plastic stents, drainage of hilar strictures, retrieval of migrated stents and combined stenting in malignant biliary and duodenal obstructions.The target readership for the Clinical Guideline mostly includes digestive endoscopists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, radiologists, internists, and surgeons while the Technology Review should be most useful to endoscopists who perform biliary drainage.

Intraductal US in the assessment of tumor involvement to the orifice of the cystic duct by malignant biliary obstruction

Tumor involvement to the orifice of the cystic duct (OCD) is a risk factor for cholecystitis after metallic stent (MS) placement. ERCP and intraductal US (IDUS) were used to assess tumor involvement to the OCD. A prospective consecutive study. The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan. Between January 2003 and May 2007, 34 patients with resectable malignant biliary obstruction underwent an ERCP and an IDUS before preoperative biliary drainage. ERCP and IDUS findings were confirmed via a histopathologic analysis of surgical specimens. An ERCP showed that the cystic duct was opacified in 22 of 34 patients (64.7%). Eight patients were diagnosed with OCD tumor involvement. In the remaining 12 patients, tumor involvement was impossible to evaluate via an ERCP. An IDUS identified tumor involvement to the OCD in all 34 patients. Tumor involvement to the OCD was diagnosed in 12 patients, including 4 patients with previously negative results during an ERCP. Tumor involvement was confirmed by histopathology of surgical specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of detection were 66.7% (8/12) and 63.6% (14/22), respectively, via ERCP, and 100% (12/12) and 100% (22/22), respectively, via IDUS. The small sample size. IDUS, in addition to ERCP, provides an accurate evaluation of tumor involvement to the OCD in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.