Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

Current management of gastric adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.

Gastric adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The management of this aggressive malignancy largely depends on tumor characteristics especially stage. Superficial early-stage gastric cancer can be safely managed by endoscopic resection, though clear negative deep and lateral margins must be obtained. Optimal surgical resection is an essential part of the treatment for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, with perioperative and adjuvant therapies having significant impact on long-term outcomes. Chemoradiation is reserved for patients with suboptimal surgical resection. Recent therapeutic advances have prolonged survival in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma, include checkpoint inhibitors and biomarker-directed therapy. Targeted therapies in gastric adenocarcinoma include monoclonal antibodies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). While anti-VEGF therapies were not found beneficial in the perioperative setting, the effectiveness of HER2 targeted agents in resectable HER2-positive gastric adenocarcinoma is being studied. Microsatellite instability (MSI) varies greatly in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma between 5-20% based on ethnic origin, tumour heterogeneity and staging. The role chemotherapy in the perioperative setting for patients with MSI-high tumors remains controversial while immunotherapy demonstrates promising results in preliminary studies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who express programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and is now being investigated in the perioperative setting.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in primary gastric adenocarcinoma and matched metastases

BackgroundCombination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy is recommended for first line treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) patients with locally advanced unresectable disease or metastatic disease. However, data regarding the concordance rate between PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) in primary GC and matched regional lymph node metastasis (LNmet) or matched distant metastasis (Dmet) is limited.MethodsTissue microarray sections from primary resected GC, LNmet and Dmet were immunohistochemically stained with anti-PD-L1 (clone SP263). PD-L1 expression was scored separately in tumour cells and immune cells and compared between matched primary GC, LNmet and/or Dmet. CPS was calculated and results for CPS cut-offs 1 and 5 were compared between matched samples.Results275 PD-L1 stained GC were analysed. 189 primary GC had matched LNmet. CPS cut-off 1 concordance rate between primary GC and LNmet was 77%. 23 primary GC had matched Dmet but no matched LNmet, CPS cut-off 1 concordance rate was 70%. 63 primary GC had both matched LNmet and matched Dmet, CPS cut-off 1 concordance rate of 67%. CPS cut-off 5 results were similar. The proportion of PD-L1 positive tumour cells increased from primary GC (26%) to LNmet (42%) and was highest in Dmet (75%).ConclusionOur study showed up to 33% discordance of PD-L1 CPS between primary GC and LNmet and/or Dmet suggesting that multiple biopsies of primary GC and metastatic sites might need to be tested before considering treatment options. Moreover, this is the first study that seems to suggest that tumour cells acquire PD-L1 expression during disease progression.

Pain and Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (LOGICA-Trial)

BackgroundLaparoscopic gastrectomy could reduce pain and opioid consumption, compared to open gastrectomy. However, it is difficult to judge the clinical relevance of this reduction, since these outcomes are reported in few randomized trials and in limited detail. MethodsThis secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial compared laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). Postoperative pain was analyzed by opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg/day) at postoperative day (POD) 1–5, WHO analgesic steps, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS, 0–10) at POD 1–10 and discharge. Regression and mixed model analyses were performed, with and without correction for epidural analgesia. ResultsBetween 2015 and 2018, 115 patients in the laparoscopic group and 110 in the open group underwent surgery. Some 16 patients (14%) in the laparoscopic group and 73 patients (66%) in the open group received epidural analgesia. At POD 1–3, mean opioid consumption was 131, 118, and 53 mg OME lower in the laparoscopic group, compared to the open group, respectively (all p < 0.001). After correcting for epidural analgesia, these differences remained significant at POD 1–2 (47 mg OME, p = 0.002 and 69 mg OME, p < 0.001, respectively). At discharge, 27% of patients in the laparoscopic group and 43% patients in the open group used oral opioids (p = 0.006). Mean highest daily pain scores were between 2 and 4 at all PODs, < 2 at discharge, and did not relevantly differ between treatment arms. ConclusionIn this multicenter randomized trial, postoperative pain was comparable between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. After laparoscopic gastrectomy, this was generally achieved without epidural analgesia and with fewer opioids. Trial RegistrationNCT02248519.

Concordance of microsatellite instability and mismatch repair status in paired biopsies and surgical specimens of resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: time for a call to action.

Reliability of mismatch repair proteins and microsatellite instability assessment is essential in order to define treatment strategy and identify candidates to immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma. We evaluated the concordance of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status between endoscopic biopsies and surgical specimens. Consecutive patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma classified as MSI-H/dMMR by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) and operated at three referral Institutions were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of concordance between biopsy and surgical samples. If needed, central revision by IHC/PCR was performed by specialized pathologists from coordinating Institutions. Thirteen (19.7%) out of 66 patients showed discordant MSI-H/dMMR results in the original pathology reports. In most cases (11, 16.7%) this was due to the diagnosis of proficient mismatch repair status on biopsies. Among the ten cases available for central review, four were due to sample issues, fourwere reclassified as dMMR, onecase showed dMMR status but was classified as microsatellite stable by PCR, one was linked to misdiagnosis of endoscopic biopsy by the local pathologist. Heterogeneity of mismatch repair proteins staining was observed in two cases. Available methods can lead to conflicting results in MSI-H/dMMR evaluation between endoscopic biopsies and surgical samples of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Strategies aiming to improve the reliability of assessment should be primarily focused on the optimization of tissue collection and management during endoscopy and adequate training of dedicated gastrointestinal pathologists within the multidisciplinary team.

Distal Versus Total D2-Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Secondary Analysis of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes Including Quality of Life in the Multicenter Randomized LOGICA-Trial

BackgroundDistal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer can cause less morbidity than total gastrectomy (TG), but may compromise radicality. No prospective studies administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and few assessed quality of life (QoL). MethodsThe multicenter LOGICA-trial randomized laparoscopic versus open D2-gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1–4aN0–3bM0) in 10 Dutch hospitals. This secondary LOGICA-analysis compared surgical and oncological outcomes after DG versus TG. DG was performed for non-proximal tumors if R0-resection was deemed achievable, TG for other tumors. Postoperative complications, mortality, hospitalization, radicality, nodal yield, 1-year survival, and EORTC-QoL-questionnaires were analyzed using Χ2-/Fisher’s exact tests and regression analyses. ResultsBetween 2015 and 2018, 211 patients underwent DG (n = 122) or TG (n = 89), and 75% of patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DG-patients were older, had more comorbidities, less diffuse type tumors, and lower cT-stage than TG-patients (p < 0.05). DG-patients experienced fewer overall complications (34% versus 57%; p < 0.001), also after correcting for baseline differences, lower anastomotic leakage (3% versus 19%), pneumonia (4% versus 22%), atrial fibrillation (3% versus 14%), and Clavien-Dindo grading compared to TG-patients (p < 0.05), and demonstrated shorter median hospital stay (6 versus 8 days; p < 0.001). QoL was better after DG (statistically significant and clinically relevant) in most 1-year postoperative time points. DG-patients showed 98% R0-resections, and similar 30-/90-day mortality, nodal yield (28 versus 30 nodes; p = 0.490), and 1-year survival after correcting for baseline differences (p = 0.084) compared to TG-patients. ConclusionsIf oncologically feasible, DG should be preferred over TG due to less complications, faster postoperative recovery, and better QoL while achieving equivalent oncological effectiveness. Mini-abstractDistal D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer resulted in less complications, shorter hospitalization, quicker recovery and better quality of life compared to total D2-gastrectomy, whereas radicality, nodal yield and survival were similar.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/EGJC): Preliminary results of a phase 2, single-arm trial.

e16084 Background: Recently, immunotherapy combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy have been recommended by the clinical guidelines of many countries as the first-line treatment for advanced HER2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Combining chemotherapy with tislelizumab and trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting may benefit patients with locally advanced, resectable HER2-positive GC/GEJC. Methods: This study is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT04819971). Patients with histologically confirmed cT2-4NxM0 or cTxN+M0, (TNM 8th edition), resectable gastric adenocarcinoma are eligible for this study. Neoadjuvant therapy will be administered for four cycles. The patients will receive tislelizumab and trastuzumab for 1 cycle (Q3W), followed by tislelizumab and trastuzumab combined with DOS (Docetaxel + Oxaliplatin + S-1) for 3 cycles (Q3W). Surgery is planned 4-6 weeks after preoperative treatment. Patients who have complete surgical resection will receive adjuvant therapy starting within 4–6 weeks after surgery for 6 cycles (three cycles of tislelizumab and trastuzumab combined with DOS regimen, followed by 6 weeks of tislelizumab and trastuzumab for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, 1-year and 2-year event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: From September 13, 2021 to February 01, 2023, 12 patients were enrolled (58.0% male, median age 61 years old), and the median follow up time was 7.3 months (0.4-16.9). Seven patients completed surgery, and 5 patients were undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. The R0 resection rate was 100%, 3 patients (42.9%) achieved pCR, and 4 patients (57.1%) achieved major pathological remission (MPR). Postoperative pathology showed tumor downstaging in 5 cases after neoadjuvant therapy, with a decrease rate of 71.4%. Median OS and EFS have not been reached. The most common AEs (all grades, grade ≥3) were anemia in 1 (8.3%) and neutropenia in 1 case (8.3%). The immune-related adverse events were all grade 1 included 2 thyroid dysfunction (16.7%), 1 abnormal liver function (8.3%), and 1 of elevated blood sugar (8.3%). No grade 3 or higher immune-related AE was observed. No treatment related deaths were reported. Conclusions: According to the preliminary results, tislelizumab combined with trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy in the perioperative period of HER2-positive GC and EGJ have a good clinical benefit trend and controllable security. Clinical trial information: NCT04819971 .

Toripalimab combined with fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) regimen or combined with oxaliplatin and tegafur (SOX) regimen in perioperative treatment of locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJ): An open-label, randomized, phase II study.

e16090 Background: Currently, NCCN guidelines recommend PD-1 inhibitors for the first-line therapy in gastric cancer patients (pts). However, the role of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in the perioperative setting remains unclear. This phase 2 study aimed to evaluate toripalimab plus FOLFIRINOX or SOX as perioperative treatment regimens in pts with locally advanced resectable G/GEJ. Methods: Pts were 1:1 ratio randomized to A or B groups. Pts in A group received four cycles of toripalimab (240mg, D1, q2w) and FOLFIRINOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 65 mg/m², d1; irinotecan, 150 mg/m², d1; leucovorin, 200 mg/m², d1; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m², d1-2, q2w) prior to surgery. Then D2 radical gastrectomy was performed, and another 4 cycles of toripalimab and FOLFIRINOX regimen were given within 2 months after surgery. In B group, chemo was changed to SOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m², d1; S-1, 40-60 mg/m2, d1-14, q3w) and toripalimab (240mg, D1) was administered every 3 weeks. The rest treatments were the same as A group. The primary endpoint was tumor regression grade (TRG, TRG 0-1). Key secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS) and safty. Results: Up to Jan 28, 2023, 54 eligible pts were enrolled (A 21, B 33) with baseline characteristics as follows: The median (range) age was 67 (23-71) years; 6/54 (11.1%) pts had signet ring cell carcinoma component; 40/54 (74.1%) pts had cT4 tumors and 18/54 (33.3%) had lymph node positive disease. 32/54 (59.3%) pts underwent successful resection. R0 resection rate was 100%. The TRG 0-1 rate was higher but not significant in the B group than in the A group (31.58% vs. 23.08%, P = 0.703). 4 pts (A 2, 15.4%; B 2, 10.5%) had a pCR. 23 (A 8, B 15, 71.9%) pts had tumor downstaged after surgery. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 25/54 (46.3%) pts. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 10/54 (18.5%) pts: 7 with grade 3-4 neutropenia, 2 with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and 1 with grade 3 myelosuppression. No new safety signals were observed and no TRAEs leading to death in either group. Conclusions: Toripalimab plus FOLFIRINOX or SOX regimens is tolerable and effective for pts with locally advanced resectable G/GEJ in the perioperative treatment setting. There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between the two groups. Whether intensive or simplified treatment is more suitable for neoadjuvant therapy needs to be further explored. The low pCR rate in both groups may be due to the small sample size and the pts with more advanced primary tumors. This study is ongoing and more data will be released. Clinical trial information: NCT04908566 . [Table: see text]

Inflammatory Ratios as Survival Prognostic Factors in Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers (NLR-neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, PLR-platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, LMR-lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, SII-systemic immune-inflammation index) and overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Over a six-year period (2016-2021), we conducted a longitudinal retrospective cohort research on 549 patients with resectable stomach adenocarcinoma. The overall survival was determined using the univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazards models. The age of the cohort varied between 30 and 89 years old, with an average age of 64.85 ± 10.51 years. Four hundred seventy-six patients (86.7%) had R0 resection margins. Eighty-nine (16.21%) subjects received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two hundred sixty-two (47.72%) patients died during the follow-up period. The median survival time in the cohort was 390 days. A significantly lower (p = 0.029-Logrank test) median survival was observed for R1 resections (355 days) in comparison with R0 resections (395 days). Significant differences in survival were observed regarding tumor differentiation, tumoral (T), and node (N) stage. No differences in survival were observed between the low or high value of inflammatory biomarkers (dichotomized by median value in the sample). In the COX univariate and multivariate regression models, elevated NLR proved an independent prognostic factor for lower overall survival [HR = 1.068, (95% CI 1.011-1.12)]. In this study, the other inflammatory ratios (PLR, LMR, and SII) did not prove as prognostic factors for gastric adenocarcinoma. In resectable gastric adenocarcinoma, elevated NLR before surgery was associated with lower overall survival. PLR, LMR, and SII had no prognostic value for the patient's survival.

Outcomes after endoscopic local excision of early-stage gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States

Background and objectivesLocal excision (LE) for early-stage gastric cancer has expanded in the United States over recent years, however, national outcomes are unknown. The objective of the study was to evaluate national survival outcomes following LE for early-stage gastric cancer. MethodsPatients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database then classified by LE curability into eCuraA (high) and eCuraC (low) according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. Demographics, clinical/provider descriptors, and perioperative/survival outcomes were extracted. Propensity-weighted cox proportional hazards regression assessed factors associated with overall survival. ResultsPatients were stratified into eCuraA (N = 1167) and eCuraC (N = 13,905) subgroups. Postoperative 30-day mortality (0% vs 2.8%, p < 0.001) and readmission (2.3% vs 7.8%, p = 0.005) favored LE. Local excision was not associated with survival on propensity-weighted analyses. However, among eCuraC patients, LE was associated with higher likelihood of positive margins (27.1% vs 7.0%, p < 0.001), which was the strongest predictor of poor survival (HR 2.0, p < 0.001). ConclusionsAlthough early morbidity is low, oncologic outcomes following LE are compromised for eCuraC patients. These findings support careful patient selection and treatment centralization in the early adoption phase of LE for gastric cancer.

Three-arm endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type.

A 65-year-old man was diagnosed with intramucosal carcinoma by endoscopy and pathological biopsy; the tumor was 10 mm in size and located in the greater curvature of the gastric body ([Fig. 1 a]). It was difficult to perform endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the greater curvature of the gastric body. We therefore proposed a three-arm endoscopic mucosal resection (TA-EMR) technique in which two nasal oxygen tubes, about 80 cm in length, were taped to the outside of the endoscope to become a double additional working channel (AWC) ([Video 1]).

Extracellular volume fraction determined by equilibrium contrast-enhanced computed tomography: correlation with histopathological findings in gastric cancer

PurposeTo assess the relationship between histopathological features of gastric cancer and the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) measured by preoperative equilibrium contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).Materials and methodsThe study group consisted of 66 patients with surgically resected gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative multiphasic CECT. Tumor ECVs were calculated using region-of-interest measurements within the gastric cancer and aorta of each case on unenhanced and equilibrium-phase images. The relationship between the mean ECV values and clinicopathological parameters was examined by univariate analysis. Parameters showing a significant difference in the former test were further tested by linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.ResultsIn the univariate analysis, the values of venous invasion (p = 0.0487) and tumor infiltration (INF) pattern (p < 0.0001) were significantly correlated with the tumor ECV. INF was significantly correlated (β = 0.57, p < 0.0001) in the linear regression analysis. The tumor ECV showed better diagnostic accuracy for predicting INF (INFa/b vs INFc), and the area under the ROC curve value was 0.89.ConclusionTumor ECV determined by equilibrium CECT is significantly correlated with the pathological INF of gastric cancer.

Nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as conversion therapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

343 Background: Conversion therapy can improve the survival of patients with locally advanced unresectable or potentially resectable metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as a conversion therapy in gastric cancer. Methods: This was a single-arm, multicenter, open-label trial of patients with locally advanced unresectable or potentially resectable metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, day 1), and S-1 (80–120 mg/day, days 1–14) every 21 days for two or four cycles. Radiographic assessments were performed after two cycles of treatment. Subsequent treatment or surgery was decided by the investigator according to assessment results and patient's condition. The primary endpoint was R0 resection rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From January 2020 to September 2022, 62 patients (49 males/13 females) with a median age of 58.9 years (range: 36–73) were enrolled in this study. Sixteen (25.8%) of the 62 patients had distant metastasis. The overall response rate and disease control rate of 54 patients who underwent at least one assessment were 61.1% (33/54, 95% CI: 46.9–74.1%) and 94.4% (51/54, 95% CI: 84.6–98.8%), respectively. Of the 39 patients who underwent surgery, 33 (84.6%, 95% CI: 69.5–94.1%) patients had an R0 resection, two had an R1 resection, and four had exploratory laparotomies. The pathological complete response rate was 15.4% (6/39, 95% CI: 6.4–31.2%). After a median follow-up time of 8.4 months, the 1-year PFS rate was 68.6% (95% CI: 53.4–83.8%), whereas the median PFS and OS were not reached. Seven patients died because of disease progression (5 patients who did not undergo surgery), myocardial infarction (1 patient), and electrolyte disturbance (1 patient). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 82.3% (51/62) patients, although most events were grade 1–2. Common hematological toxicities were leukopenia (61.3%), neutropenia (54.8%), anemia (41.9%), and thrombocytopenia (30.6%). Common non-hematological treatment-related adverse events were nausea (53.2%), fatigue (43.5%), hepatic function abnormal (33.9%), neurotoxicity (29.0%), and diarrhea (24.2%). Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced unresectable or potentially resectable metastatic gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04047953 .

INFINITY: A multicentre, single-arm, multi-cohort, phase II trial of tremelimumab and durvalumab as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI) resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GAC/GEJAC).

358 Background: In resectable GAC/GEJAC, MSI status is associated with better survival and potential lack of benefit from chemotherapy. Given the high responsiveness of MSI tumors to immunotherapy, neoadjuvant or definitive dual CTLA-4/PD(L)-1 inhibition may allow omission of chemotherapy or surgery. Methods: INFINITY is a multicentre, single-arm, multi-cohort phase II trial (NCT04817826) investigating the activity and safety of tremelimumab+durvalumab as neoadjuvant (Cohort 1) or definitive (Cohort 2) treatment for MSI, mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and EBV-negative resectable GAC/GEJAC. In Cohort 1, patients (pts) received a 12-week treatment with single high dose tremelimumab 300 mg and durvalumab 1500 mg q4 weeks (T300/D) for 3 cycles followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pCR rate (ypT0N0) with negative ctDNA after T300/D. Secondary endpoints: disease-free survival, overall survival, quality of life. Exploratory: correlation of pCR with clinical variables, PDL-1 CPS assessed by IHC 22C3, tumor mutational burden (TMB) by Foundation One, liquid biopsies and other biomarkers. Cohort 2 investigates non operative management after same treatment regimen. Results: Overall, 18 pts with MSI/dMMR resectable cT2-4 any N GAC/GEJAC were recruited in Cohort 1. One withdrew consent and 2 achieved a complete clinical-pathological response at radiology and endoscopy (ongoing) and refused surgery. Among 15 evaluable patients, 1 had disease progression and 14 underwent resection. pCR rate was 60% (9/15) and major-complete pathological response (&lt;10% viable cells) was 80%. All pts with pCR had negative ctDNA status pre-surgery. pCR rate was 1/6 (17%) in T4 vs 8/9 (89%) in T2-3 tumors (p=0.011), whereas no correlation was found with baseline N status. PDL-1 CPS was not associated with outcomes and TMB had a non-significant trend of correlation with pCR (median TMB 26 in non-pCR vs 40 in pCR group, p=0.2). Grade≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in 3 pts of safety population (n=18): colitis, pneumonitis, liver toxicity, all resolved with high dose steroids and did not impair surgery. Two pts died after surgery for other reasons than disease or AEs, whereas no disease relapses were observed in remaining pts. QoL and additional translational analyses on RNA-seq, digital spatial profiling and ctDNA monitoring will be presented. Conclusions: Pre-operative T300/D for 3 months was safe and provided promising proof of efficacy in MSI, dMMR GAC/GEJAC pts. These results open the way to investigate NOM in pts with clinical, pathological and molecular (ctDNA minimal residual disease) complete response after T300/D. Enrollment in Cohort 2 has started after IDMC evaluation and protocol. amendment to include only pts with cT2-3 tumors confirmed at staging laparoscopy. Clinical trial information: NCT04817826 .

Safety and short-term efficacy of neoadjuvant FLOT therapy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

373 Background: Docetaxel and cisplatin, 5-FU (DCF) is a standard neoadjuvant treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on the results of the JCOG1109 study. However, DCF therapy showed that 18.6% of patients achieved pathological complete response but 16.3% had febrile neutropenia (FN) and needed hydration. In Western countries, 5-FU plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel (FLOT) is a standard perioperative treatment for resectable gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma patients. FLOT therapy showed that 2% of patients had FN and did not need hydration. However, safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant FLOT (NeoFLOT) in locally advanced ESCC patients was unclear. Methods: The subjects for this study were patients with resectable ESCC diagnosed as cT1N1-3M0, cT2-3N0-3M0, and cT1-3N0-3M1 (UICC-TNM 8th) and received NeoFLOT therapy between Feb 2021 to July 2022 at our hospital. NeoFLOT therapy (oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2, leucovorin: 200 mg/m2, 5-FU: 2600 mg/m2, docetaxel: 50 mg/m2, every 2 weeks) was administered for 4 courses. We evaluated adverse events (CTCAE ver. 5.0) and histopathological response. Results: We identified 16 eligible patients and 12 of all patients (75%) underwent surgery. 4 patients (25%) resulted in progressive disease (1 patient underwent chemoradiotherapy and 3 patients underwent surgery). R0 resection rate was 75% and complete pathologic response in primary tumor was seen in 2 patients (17%). The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in 6 patients (38%), neutropenia in 9 patients (56%). The common non-hematological toxicity, with all grades deceased appetite in 7 patients (44%) and malaise in 8 patients (50%), peripheral neuropathy in (44%). Furthermore, the incidence of FN was 6%. In patients with grade 2 or higher renal failure, no one (0%) had worsened renal function. Conclusions: NeoFLOT therapy showed well-tolerated and comparable efficacy with DCF therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy. In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021. Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs. Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, -0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis. Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers' choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy.

Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT regimen in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SIEWERT type I–III). Experience of the N. N. Blokhin russian cancer research center

To date, gastric cancer patients still have a poor prognosis. Current endoscopic or surgical treatment modalities are radical only for early gastric cancer (T1). Curability dramatically declines as tumor invasion progresses and lymph node metastasеs appear. In Europe and North America, the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with stage T2–4 cancer is 20 % [1]. Combination therapy for gastric cancer is being extensively studied to improve the treatment outcomes [2–6]. Currently, perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT regimen is the mainstay of resectable gastric cancer treatment in Europe. FLOT4-AIO randomized study has shown that the FLOT regimen was associated with significant increase in the median overall survival (50 versus 35 months), disease-free survival (18 versus 30 months) and R0 resection rate compared to ECF / ECХ regimen.In this work we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative FLOT regimen in patients with gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer type I–III cT4aN0M0, cT1–4N + M0, using a prospective database of patients treated at the N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center.

Economic evaluation of FLOT and ECF/ECX perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

ObjectiveThe perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin plus docetaxel (FLOT) was recommended by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for gastric cancer (2018 edition) for patients with resectable gastric...

Perioperative Modified FLOT Versus EOX in Locally Advanced Resectable Gastric and Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results of a Matched-Pair Analysis.

There is limited real-world data on the efficacy of 2-weekly cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FLOT) compared to epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) as perioperative therapy in esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGAC). The data of 611 patients with EGAC treated with perioperative chemotherapy and planned for curative resection between January 2013 and December 2019 were retrieved. Patients receiving EOX and a dose-modified version of FLOT (mFLOT) were evaluated. A 1:1 matching, using age, tumour location, signet ring histology, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, without replacement was performed by using nearest neighbour matching method. The primary endpoint of the study was 3-year event-free survival (EFS). A total of 593 patients (261 with EOX and 332 with mFLOT) were matched. One hundred and nighty-eight patients (76%) and 285 patients (86%) in the EOX and mFLOT cohorts underwent curative resection, respectively (p = 0.002). With a median follow-up of 35 and 53months, respectively, the primary outcome of 3-year EFS was statistically superior in patients receiving mFLOT as compared to the EOX regimen (60% vs. 39%; p < 0.001). There was a greater incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia (neoadjuvant: 18% vs. 2%; p < 0.001, adjuvant: 18% vs. 1%; p = 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (neoadjuvant: 8% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001, adjuvant: 6% vs. 0; p = 0.001) with mFLOT. mFLOT is associated with improved resection rates and survival in comparison to EOX as perioperative therapy in gastric adenocarcinomas in this large real-world cohort, with manageable increase in clinically relevant toxicities such as grade 3 and grade 4 febrile neutropenia and neutropenia.

Radiomics signature for predicting postoperative disease-free survival of patients with gastric cancer: development and validation of a predictive nomogram.

PURPOSE Radiomics can be used to determine the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). The objective of this study was to predict the disease-free survival (DFS) after GC surgery based on computed tomography-enhanced images combined with clinical features. METHODS Clinical, imaging, and pathological data of patients who underwent gastric adenocarcinoma resection from June 2015 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was DFS. Radiomics features were selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator algorithm and converted into the Rad-score. A nomogram was constructed based on the Radscore and other clinical factors. The Rad-score and nomogram were validated in the training and validation groups. RESULTS Totally, 179 patients were randomly divided into the training (n=124) and validation (n=55) groups. In the training group, validation group, and overall population, the Rad-score could be divided into categories indicating low, moderate, and high risk of recurrence, metastasis, or death; all risk categories showed a significant difference between the training, validation, and overall population groups (all P < .001). Positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio (HR)=3.07, 95% CI: 1.52-6.23, P=.002), cancer antigen-125 (HR=3.24, 95% CI: 1.54-6.80, P=.002), and the Radscore (HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87, P < .001) were independently associated with DFS. These 3 variables were used to construct a nomogram. In the training group, the areas under the curve at 3 years were 0.758 and 0.776 for the Rad-score and the nomogram, respectively, while they were both 1.000 in the validation group. The net benefit rate was analyzed using a decision curve in the training and validation groups, and the nomogram was superior to the single Rad-score. CONCLUSION Rad-score is an independent factor for DFS after gastrectomy for GC. The nomogram established in this study could be an effective tool for the clinical prediction of DFS after gastrectomy.

Development and Multicenter Validation of a Novel Immune-Inflammation-Based Nomogram to Predict Survival in Western Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (GEA): The NOMOGAST.

Background. More than 50% of operable GEA relapse after curative-intent resection. We aimed at externally validating a nomogram to enable a more accurate estimate of individualized risk in resected GEA. Methods. Medical records of a training cohort (TC) and a validation cohort (VC) of patients undergoing radical surgery for c/uT2-T4 and/or node-positive GEA were retrieved, and potentially interesting variables were collected. Cox proportional hazards in univariate and multivariate regressions were used to assess the effects of the prognostic factors on OS. A graphical nomogram was constructed using R software’s package Regression Modeling Strategies (ver. 5.0-1). The performance of the prognostic model was evaluated and validated. Results. The TC and VC consisted of 185 and 151 patients. ECOG:PS > 0 (p < 0.001), angioinvasion (p < 0.001), log (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio) (p < 0.001), and nodal status (p = 0.016) were independent prognostic values in the TC. They were used for the construction of a nomogram estimating 3- and 5-year OS. The discriminatory ability of the model was evaluated with the c-Harrell index. A 3-tier scoring system was developed through a linear predictor grouped by 25 and 75 percentiles, strengthening the model’s good discrimination (p < 0.001). A calibration plot demonstrated a concordance between the predicted and actual survival in the TC and VC. A decision curve analysis was plotted that depicted the nomogram’s clinical utility. Conclusions. We externally validated a prognostic nomogram to predict OS in a joint independent cohort of resectable GEA; the NOMOGAST could represent a valuable tool in assisting decision-making. This tool incorporates readily available and inexpensive patient and disease characteristics as well as immune-inflammatory determinants. It is accurate, generalizable, and clinically effectivex.