Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Research Articles

Investigating esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma and its comparison with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and radiomics features: a retrospective study.

Esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma (ESC) is a rare pathological subtype of esophageal carcinomas, wherein its epithelial component typically demonstrates squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the clinicopathological features and prognosis of ESC remain unclear, alongside its unique aspects compared to esophageal SCC (ESCC). Between January 2008 and December 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 67 ESC patients treated at West China Hospital. Among them, 51 patients with resected ESC were matched with 98 resected ESCC patients over the same period using propensity score matching at 1:2. The survival time and radiomics features of the two groups were compared. A total of 59 patients with resected ESC and eight patients with non-resected ESC were enrolled. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly different in patients with different TNM stages (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that length of tumor was an independent factor for OS in resetable ESC (p = 0.041). Among matched ESC and ESCC patients, OS was significantly longer for patients with ESC than those with ESCC (5-year OS, 61.1% vs. 43.6%; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.96; p = 0.032). A Rad-score for discriminating ESC from ESCC containing two CT-derived radiomics features was developed [area under the curve: 0.823 (95% CI 0.732-0.913) in the training cohort and 0.828 (95% CI 0.636-1.000) in the validation cohort, respectively]. ESC has a better prognosis when compared with ESCC. By developing a radiomics prediction model, we provide reliability and convenience for the differential diagnosis of ESC from ESCC.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combined with sequential tislelizumab for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): Preliminary results of a single-arm, open-label phase Ib trial (CRIS).

e16116 Background: Neoajuvant chemoradiation is the standard treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a survival benefit for advanced ESCC and showed promising efficacy in neoadjuvant treatment for several cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combined with sequential tislelizumab followed by surgery for resectable ESCC. Methods: This is a single-arm, phase Ib study. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed ESCC and clinical T3-4aN0M0 or T2-4aN+M0 (AJCC/UICC 8th). Patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy (41.4Gy in 23 fractions) with concurrent chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 50 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the curve of 2mg/mL/min, QW*5). Then followed by two cycles of tislelizumab (200mg, Q3W). The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety. Results: From Feb 2022 to Jan 2024, 35 patients had been enrolled, of whom the median age was (65.5 (95%CI, 59-67), including 31 (88.6%) males. 12 patients were still undergoing chemoradiotherapy and 2 patients did not receive immunotherapy due to pneumonia and myocarditis after chemoradiotherapy. 16 patients completed all 2 cycles tislelizumab preoperatively and 5 patients completed 1 cycle tislelizumab because of AEs. Two patients refused surgery after achieved complete clinical response under radiology and were still alive, the other 19 patients underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 94.7% (18/19). The pCR rate was 63.2% (12/19) and the MPR rate was 78.9% (15/19). During neoadjuvant treatment, 8 patients had a grade 3 or worse adverse event including leukopenia (33.3%, 7/21, Grade 3), esophagitis (4.8%, 1/21, Grade 3) and anemia (4.8%, 1/20, Grade 4). One patient developed grade 4 postoperative complication (5.3%, 1/19, pneumonia) and died within 90 days of surgery due to COVID-19. Grade 1-2 postoperative complications occurred in 21.1% (4/19) patients, including anastomotic fistula (21.1%, 4/19), chylothorax (5.3%, 1/19) and pneumonia (10.5%, 2/19). Conclusions: Preliminary results showed that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combined with sequential tislelizumab showed promising outcomes and well tolerated for resectable ESCC patients. Further larger prospective studies are needed to confirm such findings.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies. This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared. A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2min vs 279.60 ± 88.31min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045). Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

Recurrence-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Nationwide real-world data from Japan.

269 Background: One of the limitations of the established gold standard, overall survival (OS), is that it requires an extended follow-up period. Addressing this challenge involves investigating appropriate statistically and clinically relevant surrogate endpoints. However, there is a paucity of studies using real-world data (RWD) to explore surrogacy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our study aims to investigate whether recurrence-free survival (RFS) is a valid surrogate endpoint for OS in surgically resectable advanced ESCC patients, utilizing a comprehensive nationwide database in Japan. Methods: The ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant CF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) or DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) at 58 Japanese esophageal centers certified by the Japan Esophageal Society were retrospectively reviewed. Kendall's tau between RFS and OS was used at the individual level, and the coefficient of determination was used at the institutional level to assess surrogacy. Additionally, surrogacy between each short-term postoperative endpoint (pathological complete response [pCR] or pathological grade) and OS was investigated using novel statistical methods. Results: Our study encompassed 3154 ESCC patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy from 2010 to 2015. The cStage I/II/III/IVA/IVB (due to supraclavicular lymph node metastasis) was 224 (7.1%), 1008 (32.0%), 1664 (52.8%), 117 (3.7%), and 140 (4.4%), respectively. The 5-year OS and RFS rate for the entire cohort was 56.6% and 47.7%, respectively. In the primary analysis, a strong correlation between RFS and OS was found (Kendall's tau = 0.797, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.782 to 0.812) at the individual level. Subgroup analysis revealed that the better the pathological response, the higher the tau value. An adjusted R2 of 100.0% (95% CI: 40.2 to 100.0) was obtained with the meta-regression model at the institutional level. The surrogate threshold effect was 0.703. Tau between pCR or pathological grade and OS were -0.025 (95% CI: -0.335 to 0.285) and 0.062 (95% CI: -0.086 to 0.209), respectively. Conclusions: The present study was the first nationwide RWD investigation to demonstrate a strong correlation between RFS and OS in surgically resectable ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Notably, this correlation was more pronounced in patients who had a more effective response to NAC. These findings hold promise for expediting the development of novel neoadjuvant treatment by shortening the duration of clinical trials.

359. NFE2L2 MUTATIONS ARE PREDICTIVE AND PROGNOSTIC OF TREATMENT OUTCOME IN RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA PATIENTS

Abstract Background The poor prognosis of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) poses an unmet need to identify genomic early predictive and prognostic biomarkers to improve treatment outcome and risk stratification. Methods Retrospective targeted sequencing was performed on 80 ESCC formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens from 37 good responders and 43 poor responders receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Somatic mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in 130 cancer druggable genes with TOMA Os-seq. Kaplan Meier curve and COX regression analysis were used to estimate the risk of relapse and survival. Results Twelve patients (12/80, 15%) with hot spot NFE2L2 mutations occurred with significantly higher frequency in poor responders (p = 0.0003) and in patients with non-complete pathological response (p = 0.007) in resectable ESCC treated by chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). These patients also had poorer prognosis with higher risk of death (HR = 1.942, p = 0.039) and relapse (HR = 1.817, p = 0.063) by COX analysis. The independent prognostic role of hot spot NFE2L2 mutations was validated by the presence of recurrent plasma cell-free (ct)-DNA NFE2L2 mutations in an independent prospective cohort of resectable ESCC patients. Conclusions In summary, our study now demonstrates the clinical usefulness of hot spot NFE2L2 mutations, as a potential predictive and prognostic biomarker associated with pre-surgery CRT responses, and provides novel insights for future therapeutic options targeting the NRF signaling in resectable ESCC treated by neoadjuvant CRT. The novel prognostic role of hot spot NFE2L2 mutations may be useful markers to guide clinicians for treatment decisions in resectable ESCC patients following pre-surgery treatment.

Association between preoperative diagnosis of sarcopenia and postoperative pneumonia in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Postoperative outcomes for patients suffering from resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are related to sarcopenia. In patients with resectable ESCC, this study investigated the link between sarcopenia and postoperative pneumonia. The McKewon procedure was the only one used to treat resectable ESCC patients from January 2018 to December 2021 in this retrospective analysis. Sarcopenia was assessed using skeletal muscles at L3 and planning CT scans. It was defined when PMI was below 6.36 cm2/m2 and 3.92 cm2/m2 for men and women, separately. Analyses of multivariate and univariate logistic regression were applied for identifying the risk factors for postoperative pneumonia. The study included 773 patients with resectable ESCC in total. Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for postoperative pneumonia in individuals with resectable ESCC based on univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). The stratified analysis indicated that neither of the clinical outcomes in the logistic regression model were affected by gender, age, BMI, smoking, or pre-albumin (P for interaction > 0.006). Following the McKewon procedure, patients with resectable ESCC who were sarcopenic had a higher postoperative pneumonia rate. To prevent the development of postoperative pneumonia during the perioperative period, it may be important to control the incidence of sarcopenia.

Evaluation of Endoscopic Response Using Deep Neural Network in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

We previously reported that endoscopic response evaluation can preoperatively predict the prognosis and distribution of residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In this study, we developed artificial intelligence (AI)-guided endoscopic response evaluation using a deep neural network to discriminate endoscopic responders (ERs) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after NAC. Surgically resectable ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy following NAC were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Endoscopic images of the tumors were analyzed using a deep neural network. The model was validated with a test data set using 10 newly collected ERs and 10 newly collected non-ER images. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the endoscopic response evaluation by AI and endoscopists were calculated and compared. Of 193 patients, 40 (21%) were diagnosed as ERs. The median sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values for ER detection in 10 models were 60%, 100%, 100%, and 71%, respectively. Similarly, the median values by the endoscopist were 80%, 80%, 81%, and 81%, respectively. This proof-of-concept study using a deep learning algorithm demonstrated that the constructed AI-guided endoscopic response evaluation after NAC could identify ER with high specificity and PPV. It would appropriately guide an individualized treatment strategy that includes an organ preservation approach in ESCC patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy with immunoagent (nivolumab) or placebo plus chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant treatment in subjects with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol of a randomized, multicenter, double blind, phase II trial (NATION-2203 trial).

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) has been the recommended treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The addition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor to nCT may improve oncologic outcome and survival. However, high-level evidence of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) combined with nCT in locally advanced resectable ESCC patients are still lacking. Hence, we describe this randomized controlled trial in order to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced (stage II-III) ESCC patients. This prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial aims to enroll 90 locally advanced (stage II-III) ESCC patients who will undergo nivolumab or placebo plus chemotherapy followed by surgery. Patients will be 2:1 randomized to nivolumab/chemo and placebo/chemo group by method of stratified randomization. In both arms, patients who have not achieved complete pathological complete response (pCR) will be administered with adjuvant nivolumab for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint is pCR rate and secondary endpoints include event-free survival (EFS), R0 resection rate, and adverse events (AEs). The safety will be evaluated by AEs, grading by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0 classifications. The double-blind will be maintained between subjects and investigators until the final unblinding process. This protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital (B2022-004R). This is the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy with standard chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment for ESCC, also to explore whether adjuvant immunotherapy offers additional benefit in non-pCR patients after nCT with/without immunotherapy and R0 resection. We hypothesize that the pCR rate, R0 resection rate, EFS and OS of the study group (nivolumab/chemo) is significantly better than those of control group. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT05213312.

Elevated Preoperative NMPR Predicts an Unfavorable Chance of Survival in Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background and objectives: Combined peripheral neutrophil−platelet indexes reflecting the systemic inflammatory status have been reported to predict the clinical outcome in patients with various types of cancer. However, the prognostic value of combined neutrophil−platelet indexes in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. The study introduced a novel combined neutrophil−meanplateletvolume−platelet ratio (NMPR) index and investigated its clinical and prognostic value in patients with operable ESCC receiving curative surgery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathologic data of 277 consecutive ESCC patients who received curative resection at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in China between January 2007 and December 2010 was conducted (the training cohort). In addition, the clinicopathologic data of 101 resectable ESCC patients at Renmin Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine between December 2018 and June 2021 were collected (the external validation cohort). The optimal cutoff value of NMPR concerning overall survival (OS) in the training cohort was determined by X-tile software. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic value of NMPR along with other variables in the training cohort, which was further validated with the same cutoff value in the external validation cohort. Significant predictors of OS were used to construct the nomogram, of which the discrimination and calibration was evaluated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Results: With a cutoff value of 16.62, the results from both the training and external validation cohorts supported the association of high NMPR (>16.62) with increased tumor length and advanced T stage but not with other variables. In the training cohort, a significant association between shorter OS and high NMPR (p = 0.04) as well as high CRP (p < 0.001), poor tumor differentiation (p = 0.008), advanced T stage (p = 0.006), advanced N stage (p < 0.001) and high CEA (p = 0.007) was revealed. Additionally, the high NMPR was verified to independently predict unfavorable OS (p = 0.049) in the external validation cohort. The C-index of the OS nomogram cooperating significant predictors in the training cohort was 0.71 and the calibration plots of the OS nomogram fitted well. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that high NMPR is an independent predictor of unfavorable OS in resectable ESCC patients without neoadjuvant therapy.

479. THE ROLE OF PET/CT IN PREDICTING THE PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY FOR RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Abstract Accurate assessment of residual disease of tumor and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is crucial in the active surveillance for patients with pathological complete response (pCR) and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with non-pCR. This post-hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Fifty-eight resectable ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in combination with chemotherapy were enrolled in the final analysis. The scans of 18F-FDG-PET/CT were acquired at baseline (scan-1) and after immunochemotherapy but prior to surgery (scan-2). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), tumor-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio (SUVTBR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were evaluated for their association with the pathological response to immunochemotherapy. The TLG and MTV at scan-1 was significantly lower in pCR than that in non-pCR group. At scan-2, the SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVTBR, TLG and MTV were significantly lower in pCR. Decrease in TLG and MTV between scan-2 and scan-1 were significantly higher in the pCR group. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVTBR, TLG and MTV in scan-2 showed excellent predictive value for the pCR of primary tumors. Furthermore, SUVmax at scan-2 were significantly higher in positive lymph nodes than that in negative ones, suggested a high negative predictive ability (98.6%) with a cut-off value at 1.4. The parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT have the excellent performance for predicting pCR after the combined neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable ESCC.

EP07.02-006 Tumor Immune Microenvironment Related Makers are Overexpressed and Served as Favourable Prognostic Factors in Resectable ESCC

Previous studies have shown that the expression of tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) related makers is closely related to tumor prognosis. However, there are rare studies to explore the prognostic value of related biomarkers in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to investigate the relationship of PD-L1, CD8, LAG3, TIGIT, TIM3, and CD163 expression and the clinicopathological features in resectable ESCC patients.

Real-world Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant DCF Over CF in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score-matched Analysis From 85 Authorized Institutes for Esophageal Cancer in Japan.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy over cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) in patients with surgically resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), using real-world data from 85 esophageal centers. JCOG1109 trial, which assessed the superiority of DCF over CF, and the superiority of chemoradiotherapy with CF over CF alone demonstrated the significant survival advantage of neoadjuvant DCF in overall survival (OS) over CF for ESCC. The ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant CF or DCF at 85 Japanese esophageal centers certified by the Japan Esophageal Society were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity score (PS) matching, the OS and recurrence-free survival were compared between CF and DCF. We initially enrolled 4781 patients. After data cleaning and PS matching using pretreatment variables, 1074 patients for each group were selected for subsequent analysis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pneumonia and anastomotic leakage. In the survival analysis, OS was significantly longer in DCF group than CF group (hazard ratio, 0.868; 95% confidence interval, 0.770-0.978; P =0.02), as well as recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.850; 95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.949; P =0.004). The survival advantage of DCF was not observed in patients with 76 years old or older. Neoadjuvant DCF therapy showed a remarkable survival advantage in surgically resectable ESCC patients, especially in patients who were 75 years old or younger. The current real-world evidence will encourage recommendations for DCF as a standard regimen in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-based treatment strategy for ESCC.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in combination with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Accurate assessment of residual disease of tumor and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is crucial in the active surveillance for patients with pathological complete response (pCR) and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for patients with non-pCR. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Fifty-eight resectable ESCC patients receivedtwo cycles of camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy and were enrolled in the final analysis. The 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were acquired at baseline (scan-1) and after immunochemotherapy but prior to surgery (scan-2). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), tumor-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio (SUVTBR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were evaluated for their association with the pathological response to immunochemotherapy. Nineteen patients (32.8%, 19/58) had pCR and thirty-nine patients (67.2%, 39/58) had non-pCR after two doses of camrelizumab and chemotherapy. At scan-2, the SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVTBR, TLG, and MTV were significantly lower in pCR than in non-pCR patients. Decrease in TLG and MTV between scan-2 and scan-1 of the same patient was significantly higher in the pCR than in the non-pCR group. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVTBR, TLG, and MTV in scan-2 showed excellent predictive value for the pCR of primary tumors. Furthermore, SUVmax in scan-2 were higher in positive lymph nodes than in negative ones, suggesting a high negative predictive ability (98.6%) with a cut-off value at 1.4. The parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT have the excellent performance for predicting pCR after the combined neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable ESCC. ChiCTR2000028900. Registered on January 6,2020.

Safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery for locally advanced resectable (stage III) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a study protocol for a prospective, single-arm, single-center, open-label, phase-II trial (Keystone-001).

BackgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most refractory malignant tumors. Esophageal cancer (EC) is a malignant tumor with a high incidence worldwide, and over 50% of EC cases occur in China. Under the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the only standard neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced ESCC. In the first-line treatment of advanced ESCC, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with systemic chemotherapy is significantly better than that of chemotherapy alone. Paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP), as one of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced ESCC, have been widely used in China in recent years. ICIs combined with TP as neoadjuvant therapy seems promising.MethodsThis is an open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase-II trial. Locally advanced resectable (stage III) ESCC patients who have not undergone previous systemic treatments will be enrolled in this study. All the subjects will intravenously receive 3 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) on day 1, paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) on day 2, and cisplatin (20 mg/m2) on days 2–4, every 3 weeks. After an efficacy evaluation, the subjects will undergo Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection. If the postoperative pathologic results do not reveal a complete response, pembrolizumab will be administrated for at least 6 cycles as an adjuvant therapy with the same usage as before. The primary endpoints are the major pathological response and safety. The secondary endpoints include the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), the R0 resection rate, and perioperative complications. The exploratory endpoint is to examine the correlation between related biomarkers and tumor responses to this neoadjuvant treatment regimen.DiscussionThis trial is the first enrolled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with TP as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced ESCC. Currently, under the NCCN guidelines, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the only recommended treatment for locally advanced ESCC. This phase-II study will provide preliminary evidence of the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with TP as novel neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced ESCC.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04389177).

Toripalimab Plus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, their efficacy in locally advanced resectable ESCC and the potential predictive biomarkers have limited data.MethodsIn this study, locally advanced resectable ESCC patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg, day 1) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, day 1) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min, day 1) in each 3-week cycle for 2 cycles, followed by esophagectomy planned 4-6 weeks after preoperative therapy. The primary endpoints were safety, feasibility, and the major pathological response (MPR) rate; the secondary endpoints were the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Association between molecular signatures/tumor immune microenvironment and treatment response was also explored.ResultsTwenty resectable ESCC patients were enrolled. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients (100%), and 4 patients (22.2%) experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs. Sixteen patients underwent surgery without treatment-related surgical delay, and the R0 resection rate was 87.5% (14/16). Among the 16 patients, the MPR rate was 43.8% (7/16) and the pCR rate was 18.8% (3/16). The abundance of CD8+ T cells in surgical specimens increased (P = .0093), accompanied by a decreased proportion of M2-type tumor-associated macrophages (P = .036) in responders upon neoadjuvant therapy. Responders were associated with higher baseline gene expression levels of CXCL5 (P = .03) and lower baseline levels of CCL19 (P = .017) and UMODL1 (P = .03).ConclusionsThe combination of toripalimab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin is safe, feasible, and effective in locally advanced resectable ESCC, indicating its potential as a neoadjuvant treatment for ESCC.Clinical Trial registrationNCT04177797

Pretreatment BAN Score Based on Body-mass-index, Albumin and Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio Could Predict Long-term Survival for Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background: The present study was designed to examine the prognostic value of a systemic inflammation marker-BAN score, which was established based on body-mass-index (BMI), albumin (ALB) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.Methods: A total of 420 newly diagnosed ESCC patients in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2013 were included. Their baseline characteristics were retrospectively reviewed and collected. BAN score was calculated as (BMI × ALB/ NLR). The optimal cutoff value for BAN score was defined as 28.0 in terms of survival. Patients were then allocated to high BAN (≥ 28.0) and low BAN (< 28.0) score groups.Results: Pretreatment BAN score was significantly associated with tumor length, white blood cell count, BMI, ALB and NLR levels. However, no significant difference was observed in patients' age, gender, tumor location, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage or other variables between groups. Moreover, those with high pretreatment BAN scores (≥ 28.0) tended to have favorable disease free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.650; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.481-0.877; P = 0.005] and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.608; 95% CI, 0.445-0.829; P = 0.002) by univariate analysis. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that high BAN score (≥ 28.0) could serve as an independent predictor for both DFS (HR, 0.726; 95% CI, 0.532-0.993; P = 0.045) and OS (HR, 0.670; 95% CI, 0.485-0.927; P = 0.016).Conclusions: Pretreatment BAN score could independently predict long-term survival for resectable ESCC patients.

Development and validation of a novel pre-operative comprehensive prognostic score in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

We herein propose a novel integrative score based on inflammatory and nutritional score, coagulation indicator and tumor marker, named comprehensive prognostic score (CPS), to predict post-operative survival in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We also aimed to establish and validate a nomogram based on CPS and other clinical features for individual survival prediction. A total of 490 resectable ESCC patients were randomly divided into either a training or validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3 for retrospective analysis. The CPS, based on squamous cell carcinoma antigen, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and fibrinogen, was divided into two models to verify its prognostic value. The predictive model of CPS-based nomogram was established and validated in two cohorts. The patients with CPS low group in Model 1 had better 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) than those in CPS high group (50.7% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001). For Model 2, the 5-year CSS for CPS 0, 1 and 2 were 75.0%, 38.9% and 13.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). CPS was confirmed as an independent prognostic score in both models. The CPS-based nomogram can accurately and effectively predict survival in resected ESCC. The CPS is a novel, simple, and effective predictor in resectable ESCC. Moreover, CPS has a potential independent prognostic value in predicting post-operative survival, which can accurately and effectively predict individual survival in resectable ESCC.

The preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score is a useful predictor in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

ABSTRACTThe hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score has been confirmed as a prognostic factor in several types of cancers. The current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative HALP score, an inflammatory and nutritional based score, in predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in resectable patients undergoing curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The clinical data of 355 consecutive patients with ESCC who underwent curative resection were retrospectively conducted and analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for preoperative HALP. The areas under the curve (AUC) for preoperative HALP and other variables were calculated and compared. Cox regression analyses and Kaplan–Meier methods were used to identify the factors associated with CSS. According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value for preoperative HALP was 31.8. The 5-year CSS for preoperative HALP low (≤31.8) and high (>31.8) was 15.1% and 47.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Preoperative HALP had reliable abilities to predict CSS in resectable ESCC patients in any stage or gender, according to the subgroup analysis based on the patients’ cancer stage and gender. Multivariate analyses confirmed that preoperative HALP was an independent prognostic score regarding CSS in patients with resectable ESCC (p < 0.001). This study confirmed that the postoperative HALP score could be regarded as a potential independent prognostic factor for CSS in patients with resectable ESCC.

Low GSTM3 expression is associated with poor disease\u2010free survival in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundGlutathione S-transferase mu 3 (GSTM3) plays a crucial role in tumor progression in various cancers. However, the relationship between GSTM3 expression and the clinical prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been studied to date. We aimed to characterize the role of GSTM3 in predicting postoperative prognosis of ESCC patients.MethodsIn the retrospective study, GSTM3 mRNA levels in 184 ESCC tissues and matched 43 adjacent nontumorous tissues were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. GSTM3 protein levels in 247 ESCC tissues were measured by immunohistochemistry.ResultsDownregulation of GSTM3 occurred in 62.8 % of primary ESCC tissues compared with their nontumor counterparts. Patients with low GSTM3 expression tended to exhibit an increased rate of poor differentiation in both the mRNA cohort (p = 0.024) and protein cohort (p = 0.004). In the mRNA cohort, low GSTM3 expression was associated with unfavorable 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (39.2 % vs. 57.4 %) and 5-year DFS (26.8 % vs. 45.1 %) (p = 0.023). The result was confirmed in the protein cohort. Patients with low GSTM3 expression had unfavorable 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (18.7 % vs. 33.5 %) and 5-year DFS (5.3 % vs. 30.5 %) (p = 0.006). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that GSTM3 expression was an independent prognostic factor.ConclusionsThe findings of the present study provide evidence that GSTM3 may function as a tumor suppressor in ESCC and represents a potential novel prognostic biomarker for disease-free survival for resected ESCC patients.

Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing neoadjuvant Adriamycin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil vs docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by surgery for esophageal cancer (OGSG1003).

AimThe aim is to report the long‐term outcomes of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) vs Adriamycin (ACF) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Previously, this trial showed that DCF is associated with prolonged recurrence‐free survival (RFS).MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to two cycles of ACF (35 mg/m2 of Adriamycin, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 7 days) every 4 weeks or DCF (70 mg/m2 of docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was RFS. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsBetween October 2011 and October 2013, 162 patients at 10 institutions were enrolled in the study, 162 of whom were eligible and randomly assigned to the two groups. The median follow‐up for surviving patients was 69.8 months. The 5‐year RFS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (59.9% vs 40.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35‐0.86; P = .009) and the 5‐year OS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (63.5% vs 49.4%, HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38‐0.96; P = .03). The benefit of DCF chemotherapy on survival was significantly greater in the subgroups with more advanced clinical T and N stage.ConclusionsCisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel are associated with better RFS and OS than ACF in resectable ESCC patients.