Abstract

AimThe aim is to report the long‐term outcomes of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) vs Adriamycin (ACF) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Previously, this trial showed that DCF is associated with prolonged recurrence‐free survival (RFS).MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to two cycles of ACF (35 mg/m2 of Adriamycin, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 7 days) every 4 weeks or DCF (70 mg/m2 of docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was RFS. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsBetween October 2011 and October 2013, 162 patients at 10 institutions were enrolled in the study, 162 of whom were eligible and randomly assigned to the two groups. The median follow‐up for surviving patients was 69.8 months. The 5‐year RFS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (59.9% vs 40.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35‐0.86; P = .009) and the 5‐year OS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (63.5% vs 49.4%, HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38‐0.96; P = .03). The benefit of DCF chemotherapy on survival was significantly greater in the subgroups with more advanced clinical T and N stage.ConclusionsCisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel are associated with better RFS and OS than ACF in resectable ESCC patients.

Highlights

  • These long-term results confirm the initial report that preoperative docetaxel + cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy followed by surgery is associated with prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) when compared to preoperative Adriamycin + cisplatin and fluorouracil (ACF) chemotherapy followed by surgery

  • The present results show that compared with preoperative ACF chemotherapy, DCF chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) when followed by surgery

  • The present study showed that neoadjuvant DCF is superior to neoadjuvant ACF in terms of RFS and OS

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease with a high degree of both distant and regional metastasis at comparatively early stages.[1]. Triplet regimens with Adriamycin, epirubicin, or docetaxel in addition to CF were recently reported to be more effective in patients with advanced esophageal cancer rather than doublet regimen.[15,16,17,18,19] we planned a clinical trial of triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens so that we can select the best chemotherapy regimen in order to compare with chemoradiotherapy in future. The randomized controlled chemotherapy for esophageal cancer followed by surgery trial (OGSG1003) compared two regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CF plus Adriamycin (ACF) vs CF plus docetaxel (DCF) plus surgery.[20] A total of 162 patients at 10 institutions were enrolled between November 2010 and October 2012. We report long-term follow-up results with analysis of the primary endpoint, RFS, as well as secondary endpoints such as overall survival (OS) and recurrence patterns

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call