Members Of Research Team Research Articles

Evaluating the Acceptability and Appropriateness of the Augmented Reality Home Assessment Tool (ARHAT): Qualitative Descriptive Study.

The Augmented Reality Home Assessment Tool (ARHAT) is a mobile app developed to provide rapid, highly accurate assessments of the home environment. It uses 3D-capture technologies to help people identify and address functional limitations and environmental barriers. This study was conducted to gain stakeholder feedback on the acceptability and appropriateness of the ARHAT for identifying and addressing barriers within home environments. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted because it allows for variability when obtaining data and seeks to understand stakeholders' insights on an understudied phenomenon. Each stakeholder group (occupational therapists, housing professionals, and aging adult and caregiver "dyads") participated in a 60-minute, web-based focus group via a secure Zoom platform. Focus group data were analyzed by 2 trained qualitative research team members using a framework method for analysis. A total of 19 stakeholders, aged from 18 to 85+ years, were included in the study. Of the occupational therapists (n=5, 26%), housing professionals (n=3, 16%), and dyads (n=11, 58%), a total of 32% (n=6) were male and 68% (n=13) were female, with most living in the Midwestern United States (n=10, 53%). The focus group data demonstrate the acceptability and appropriateness of the workflow, style, measurement tools, and impact of the ARHAT. All stakeholders stated that they could see the ARHAT being used at many different levels and by any population. Dyads specifically mentioned that the ARHAT would allow them to do forward planning and made them think of home modifications in a new light. Stakeholders found the ARHAT to be acceptable and appropriate for identifying and addressing functional limitations and barriers in the home environment. This study highlights the importance of considering the workflow, style, measurement tools, and potential impact of home assessment technology early in the developmental process.

30 Promoting Child and Youth Rights Literacy and the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) for Equity-deserving Populations: A Multi-Partner, Mixed Methods Pilot Study

Abstract Background The UNCRC outlines the rights of children and youth to develop their greatest potential. These rights provide a framework for a child-centred approach in paediatric clinical practice and are associated with improved patient outcomes and experiences. While these rights are increasingly acknowledged globally, more work is needed within clinical settings to adopt this rights-based approach. A pilot survey was developed in partnership with an equity-deserving urban youth recreation centre and youth with chronic health conditions from a provincial paediatric tertiary care teaching hospital’s Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) regarding their knowledge of, and access to, the UNCRC. Objectives 1) To identify urban community youth knowledge of, and access to, UNCRC; 2) To identify and compare YAC knowledge of, and access to, UNCRC. Design/Methods Ethics approval was obtained. A survey developed to facilitate UNCRC discussions was presented to the urban community youth, iteratively from 2020 to 2021. Participants were recruited using convenience snowball sampling. Zoom dialogues between the research team and YAC members were held to adapt the survey to YAC context. The survey was completed by YAC members on Qualtrics from May to August 2022. Demographic information and survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results 57 participants completed the survey, including 18 youth, 16 caregivers, and 11 staff members from the community, and 11 youth and 1 staff member from YAC. The median ages of urban and YAC youth were 16.4 years and 23 years respectively. Prior to the study, 70% of youth participants did not know, or only sort of knew that the UNCRC existed. Both urban youth and YAC reported that children aged 0 to10 and 11 to 14 have the most access to article 31 (rest and play). However, urban youth reported that 15 to24-year-olds have the most access to article 24 (health and health services), whereas YAC reported article 12 (respect for children’s views) for this age group. Both youth groups reported that children and youth of all ages have the least access to articles 28 and 29 (education), article 12 (respect for children’s views), and article 23 (support for children with disabilities). Conclusion A lack of knowledge of the UNCRC was prevalent in youth from both an urban community and tertiary care hospital, indicating a need for increased dialogue among this community, clinicians, and the healthcare system. These results will also inform patient advocacy communities on gaps in knowledge and access to empower advocacy around child rights.

230 Inter-rater reliability assessment of OPTI-3S (criteria for optimising medicines by stopping, stepping down, or switching to safer alternatives)

Abstract Background The OPTI-3S criteria comprise newly developed consensus-based statements identifying potentially inappropriate medications for hospitalised frail older adults. This study assessed the inter-rater reliability of the OPTI-3S core list. Methods Data were collated from ten patient cases in the publicly archived ‘The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing’ (TILDA) dataset (Wave 3). Five healthcare professionals assessed medication appropriateness across the cases according to the OPTI-3S statements, indicating the applicable statement(s). Their assessments were compared against a ‘Gold Standard (GS) assessment’ consisting of a combined assessment of a research team member and a clinically experienced academic researcher, who independently assessed the medications’ appropriateness. Concordance between the GS rating and other raters was assessed by kappa statistics. Major discrepancies were identified when a rater applied a statement >2 times more or less frequently than GS [1]. Results The ten patients’ median age was 74 (Interquartile Range: 70–80) years, and 40% were female. The median (IQR) number of medications was 10 (9–12). Cohen’s kappa coefficient ranged from 0.65 to 0.86, indicating substantial to perfect interrater reliability when agreement was measured between the GS rating and any other rater. The overall mean (95% CI) Fleiss kappa coefficient between all raters was 0.67 (0.65,0.69), indicating substantial interrater reliability. The mean Fleiss kappa coefficient (95% CI) between the GS rating and geriatricians was 0.63 (0.60, 0.67). A good Fleiss kappa coefficient of 0.81 (0.75, 0.86) was found between the GS rating and pharmacists. Major discrepancies in applying seven statements were noted between the GS rating and three raters. Three of these statements were misinterpreted, indicating revised wording is needed. Conclusion The OPTI-3S core list shows substantial inter-rater reliability between experts with no previous experience using it. However, further testing with a larger number of clinical cases and raters is required.

Challenges and recommendations for advancing respite care for families of children and youth with special health care needs: A qualitative exploration.

Caring for children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) is a significant undertaking for families. While respite care is intended to address this burden, demand continues to exceed supply. Exploring the perspectives of respite service providers (SPs) and stakeholders (SKs) provides unique insight into families' needs and respite care systems. We conducted semistructured interviews with 41 respite care SPs and SKs across four Canadian provinces to ascertain perspectives on current and ideal respite care for families of CYSHCN. The analysis included delineating units of meaning from the data, clustering units of meaning to form thematic statements and extracting themes. The second-level analysis involved applying themes and subthemes to cross-functional process maps. Participants noted the critical, but sometimes absent role of Community Service Workers, who have the ability to support families accessing and navigating respite care systems. SPs and SKs identified current respite systems as operating in crisis mode. New findings suggest an ideal respite care system would incorporate advocacy for families, empower families and value CYSHCN, their families and respite workers. The evidence of unmet respite care needs of families of CYSHCN across Canada has long been available. Our findings identifying respite system challenges and solutions can be used by funders and policymakers for planning and enhancing resources, and by healthcare professionals, respite care providers and SKs to understand barriers and take action to improve respite outcomes to meet the respite needs of all families and CYSHCN. The research team is composed of patients, researchers, clinicians and decision-makers along with our Family Advisory Committee (FAC) composed of members of families of CYSHNC. The FAC was formed and met regularly with research team members, knowledge users and collaborators throughout the study to provide input on design, review themes and ensure findings are translated and disseminated in a meaningful way.

P09.03.A DEVELOPMENT OF A CORE OUTCOME SET FOR USE IN ADULT PRIMARY GLIOMA PHASE III INTERVENTIONAL TRIALS - A MIXED METHODS STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioma patients’ high symptom burden and the poor prognosis of high grade glioma has emphasised quality of survival and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL) throughout the disease trajectory in clinical trials. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) allow insight into how investigative treatment affects patients’ perceived functioning, complementing other outcome data (e.g. survival, radiological response) in clinical decision-making. Creating robust evidence requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses across trials, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis and reporting. However, a standard ontology is lacking in cancer clinical trials, and brain tumours specifically, and selective outcome reporting is common. Core outcome set (COS) development is one means to improve data synthesis. The COBra project aimed to develop a COS for use in glioma phase III trials in support of those goals. Given stakeholder interest in PROs and prioritising the patient perspective, we also undertook initial exploration of which items could be patient reportable. MATERIAL AND METHODS A COS for adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials was developed through: (1) trial registry review and systematic review of qualitative studies; (2) interviews with glioma patients and caregivers; (3) outcome list de-duplication; (4) two-round Delphi process and outcome list rating; (5) a consensus meeting to finalise the COS. Patient-reportable COS outcomes were identified by cross-referencing the final COS outcomes with outcomes and PRO measures (PROMs) reported in the trial registry review. Activities were guided by UK Patient and Public Involvement standards and public contributors were core research team members. RESULTS A COS consisting of 19 outcomes grouped into seven outcome domains (Survival, Adverse Events, Activities of Daily Living, HRQOL, Seizure Activity, Cognitive Function and Physical Function) was finalised for use in glioma trials using this structured approach. Mapping PROMs identified in the registry review suggests that sub-domains of 6/7 outcome domains in the final COS can be patient-reported (adverse events, activities of daily living, HRQOL, seizure activity, neurocognitive function, physical function). Other currently unidentified instruments may also be suitable. Further research will identify appropriate measurement tools, promote accessible PRO delivery, and validate this COS for wider use. CONCLUSION A COS for glioma trials was developed, comprising seven outcome domains. Development of this COS coincides with growing regulatory interest in patient-reported data. To optimise data synthesis and prioritise the patient perspective, opportunities to collect data in this way should be promoted and taken. As such, this COS could be considered for use in registrational trials after further validation.

Poster (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1985364

Background/objectives The engagement of people with lived experience (PLEX) of spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) in rehabilitation research can lead to relevant questions and improved data collection, interpretation, knowledge translation, and research impact. We describe the process to create a toolkit which elaborates the roles that PLEX can play in rehabilitation research to ensure engagement is authentic and effective. Methods Five separate working groups were convened to each focus on a specific role of PLEX: research team member, peer reviewer, knowledge translator, decision-maker, and fundraising ambassador. The roles of PLEX in research, relevant training tools, and indicators to measure engagement were explored through 17 virtual meetings with 45 scientists, research staff, learners, and PLEX. Menti-meter and Survey Monkey were used to select training tools via consensus. A summative meeting was held with all participants to achieve consensus regarding the role descriptions. Meeting transcripts and survey data informed iterations of the materials prior to achieving consensus. Findings The Toolkit contains five role descriptions for PLEX as well as example activities, training requirements for scientists and PLEX, and specific indicators for each role. The Toolkit includes several best practice considerations and three practical tools for researchers to plan engagement, facilitate compensation, and implement/evaluate engagement. Conclusions The Toolkit can be used by researchers and research organizations to develop, implement, and evaluate engagement plans with PLEX in SCI/D rehabilitation research. This Toolkit can be used to transform the SCI/D rehabilitation research and advocacy agenda, and contribute to more relevant research with a greater impact.

Effectiveness of a smartphone-enabled dyadic self-care programme (SDSCP) for stroke survivors and caregivers: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

IntroductionThe promotion of self-care has begun to serve as a central response strategy to the rising burden of stroke. In fact, stroke self-care can be recognised to be a dyad...

Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations.

Patient education materials (PEMs) can be vital sources of information for the general population. However, despite American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommendations to make PEMs easier to read for patients with low health literacy, they often do not adhere to these recommendations. The readability of online PEMs in the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) field, in particular, has not been thoroughly investigated. The study sampled online OB/GYN PEMs and aimed to examine (1) agreeability across traditional readability measures (TRMs), (2) adherence of online PEMs to AMA and NIH recommendations, and (3) whether the readability level of online PEMs varied by web-based source and medical topic. This study is not a scoping review, rather, it focused on scoring the readability of OB/GYN PEMs using the traditional measures to add empirical evidence to the literature. A total of 1576 online OB/GYN PEMs were collected via 3 major search engines. In total 93 were excluded due to shorter content (less than 100 words), yielding 1483 PEMs for analysis. Each PEM was scored by 4 TRMs, including Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning fog index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and the Dale-Chall. The PEMs were categorized based on publication source and medical topic by 2 research team members. The readability scores of the categories were compared statistically. Results indicated that the 4 TRMs did not agree with each other, leading to the use of an averaged readability (composite) score for comparison. The composite scores across all online PEMs were not normally distributed and had a median at the 11th grade. Governmental PEMs were the easiest to read amongst source categorizations and PEMs about menstruation were the most difficult to read. However, the differences in the readability scores among the sources and the topics were small. This study found that online OB/GYN PEMs did not meet the AMA and NIH readability recommendations and would be difficult to read and comprehend for patients with low health literacy. Both findings connected well to the literature. This study highlights the need to improve the readability of OB/GYN PEMs to help patients make informed decisions. Research has been done to create more sophisticated readability measures for medical and health documents. Once validated, these tools need to be used by web-based content creators of health education materials.

Information is power: a qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy.

Degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR) can lead to severe pain, paraesthesia, and/or motor weakness, resulting in significant morbidity, disability, and reduced quality of life. Typically, individuals suffer from prolonged symptoms, with time to complete recovery spanning months to years. Little is known about the impact DCR has on peoples' lives. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the everyday experiences of individuals living with DCR. A qualitative study was conducted through an interpretivist lens exploring the experiences of participants. Participants were purposefully recruited and interviewed with 2 research team members. Transcripts were independently analyzed by 2 reviewers and coding was finalized by consensus. Analysis was performed using an interpretative phenomenological approach, with emergent themes mapped onto the 5 domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. Eleven participants were interviewed between December 2021 and April 2022. Three themes emerged: the biopsychosocial impact of DCR, role of the health care provider, and uncertainty surrounding DCR. Pain and paraesthesia were the most common symptoms experienced by participants, leading to significant psychological distress and impact to daily activities, most notably driving, housecleaning, sleep, and ability to work. Participants described the uncertainty they experienced as a result of the unpredictable nature of DCR and the important role that health care providers play in their journey with DCR. Health care providers were seen acting as either a facilitator or a barrier to their recovery. The findings from this study can be used by clinicians providing patient-centered care to better understand the experiences of people with DCR.

Engaging Patients and Caregivers to Develop a Patient-Centered Agenda for Comparative Effectiveness Research Focused on the Treatment of Complex Knee Problems.

Complex articular cartilage loss in the knee is being diagnosed more frequently and earlier in life, and patients are faced with major decisions regarding invasive surgical interventions at increasingly younger ages. There is a critical unmet need to provide patient-centered comparative effectiveness research for the hundreds of thousands of patients faced with these treatment decisions each year. Toward filling the need, we developed the Patient AdvisoR Team iN Orthopaedic ReSearch (PARTNORS) program. We recruited a diverse group of patients and caregivers with lived experiences in dealing with complex knee problems to define patient-centered research priorities for comparative biological and artificial knee surgery research for middle-aged adults. Adapting the Stakeholder Engagement in Question Development and Prioritization Method, PARTNORS defined a 20-question list of patient-centered research questions of factors influencing a patients' choice between biological and artificial knee surgeries. The highest prioritized research question related to functional level postsurgery as it relates to daily activities and recreational activities. The second highest prioritized research questions related to insurance coverage and financial costs. Other prioritized research areas included caregiving needs, implant longevity, recovery and rehabilitation time, patient satisfaction and success rates, individual characteristics, and risks. By engaging a group of patients and caregivers and including them as members of a multidisciplinary research team, comparative effectiveness research that includes patient-centered factors that go beyond typical clinical success indicators for knee surgery can be designed to allow physicians and patients to work together toward evidence-based shared decisions. This shared decision-making process helps to align patients' and health care team's goals and expectations to improve outcomes.

What adult patients prefer for reporting their pain levels, and frequency of reassessment when in the emergency department

ObjectivesThis study interviewed adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) for various pain conditions enquiring about their preferred tool for reporting pain severity and preferred time interval between initial assessment and subsequent pain reassessments. MethodsA prospective observational (cross-sectional) study was conducted in adult patients with acute pain in a tertiary care hospital ED setting. Patients' initial pain score was recorded using NRS (numerical rating scale) pain scale, and appropriate analgesia offered. Once the patient had been evaluated by an attending physician, a research team member interviewed the patient regarding the pain reassessment time and preferred pain assessment tool. The pain assessment tools evaluated in this study were NRS, PS (picture scale or face pain scale), VRS (verbal rating scale), and VAS (visual analogue scale). The patients were presented with the four pain assessment tools (in their primary language) through an audio-visual on an electronic tablet display. Results200 (138 male, mean age 36.5 ± 11.17) patients participated in the study. With increasing age, pain reassessment interval increased by 0.19 min (95% CI 0.03–0.36 min). Males requested pain reassessment 6.7 min (95% CI 2.2–10.8) faster than females. In this study, the preferred interval for pain reassessment was reported as a mean of 22.8 (SD + −13.6) minutes. There was no relationship reported between time reassessment and pain severity (P = 0.22). Out of 200 subjects, irrespective of the initial pain scores, 100 preferred NRS. NRS was preferred by patients with mild to moderated pain due to the perception of being faster. However, patients with severe pain choose a non-NRS scale to prioritize accuracy. ConclusionThere was no influence found between the initial pain severity scores and the desired frequency of pain reassessment. However, associations were identified between the time for pain reassessment interval and age, sex, and geographical region. Patients with severe pain preferred PS or VRS while patients with mild/moderate pain preferred the NRS.

Engaging people who use drugs in clinical research: integrating facilitated telemedicine for HCV into substance use treatment

BackgroundPeople who use drugs (PWUD) have difficulty participating in clinical research. We evaluated approaches to engage PWUD in clinical research, using facilitated telemedicine for hepatitis C virus (HCV) care as an example.MethodsWe analyzed stakeholder interview transcripts and study-related data (i.e., progress reports, meeting minutes) from interrelated studies to understand engagement experiences at the patient, site, and organizational levels. Stakeholders include patient-participants, opioid treatment program (OTP) staff and administrators, and research team members involved in HCV management through facilitated telemedicine integrated into OTPs.ResultsThree themes emerged. Initially, the research team sought understanding of the unique culture and community of each OTP (Theme 1). The team built trusting relationships through education, communication, and feedback (Theme 2). Finally, the research team enhanced collaborative care and incorporated the patients’ voice to improve health outcomes (Theme 3). Patient-participants and OTP staff endorsed the integrated HCV care approach. Engagement practices are summarized as the CREATE framework (C = culture, R = respect, E = educate, A = advantage, T = trust, E = endorse).ConclusionsPWUD engagement in clinical research is maximized by building trusting relationships with open communication channels. Understanding the community, demonstrating respect, and augmenting knowledge are foundational for engaging PWUD in clinical research. These practices are transferable to engagement of PWUD in clinical research broadly.

Identifying adolescents' gaming preferences for a tobacco prevention social game: A qualitative study.

Considering the dangers of adolescent tobacco use, the successful design of behavioral programs is crucial for tobacco prevention. According to preliminary research, social game interventions can improve adolescent tobacco outcomes. The current qualitative study aims to (1) uncover the gaming elements that adolescents deem important for a positive learning experience, and (2) confirm these gaming elements with adolescents who are presented with a tobacco prevention game concept that applies these elements. Findings from this study are drawn from two phases. Phase 1 involved in-person focus group discussions (n = 15) and Phase 2 included three online focus groups and a paired interview with another set of adolescents (n = 15). The study was conducted under a project that aimed to design and test a social game-based tobacco prevention program for adolescents (Storm-Heroes). With open coding and thematic analysis, two research team members identified repeated topics and relevant quotes to organize them into themes. The themes evolved as new content was identified during the process. This process was repeated until thematic saturation was reached. Thematic analysis across Phase 1 and Phase 2 revealed four major themes: 1) Balance during gaming challenges, 2) Healthy social interaction, 3) Performance and creative freedom, and 4) Fictional world and game mechanics for tobacco prevention. This study identified specific intervention features that best fit the needs of adolescents in the context of a social game for tobacco prevention. For future research, we will use a participatory approach to allow adolescents to take part in the design process, improve Storm-Heroes, and develop health promotional messages that can be incorporated into the program. Ultimately, a board game for tobacco prevention is expected to bring adolescents together to create lasting memories that nudge them away from tobacco use and the harm it can cause.

Factors associated with injury among Maine logging workers.

Despite dramatic improvements in safety, logging remains one of the most dangerous industries in the United States. The purpose of this study was to explore longitudinal injury trends among Maine logging workers. Loggers participated in seven quarterly surveys, over the course of 18 months. Categorical and free text data related to traumatic and acute injury, musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), and chronic pain were exported from REDCap into SAS 9.4, Excel, and NVivo, for quantitative and qualitative analysis, respectively. Time to injury was modeled using two different approaches: (1) time to the occurrence of first injury modeled by proportional hazard regression and (2) an intensity model for injury frequency. Two research team members also analyzed qualitative data using a content analysis approach. During the study, 204 injuries were reported. Of the 154 participants, 93 (60.4%) reported musculoskeletal pain on at least one survey. The majority of injuries were traumatic, including fractures, sprains, and strains. Lack of health insurance was found to be related to increased risk of first injury [HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.97-2.04, p = 0.069]. Variables found to be related to injury intensity at the univariate level were: (1) a lack of health insurance [HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.04-2.20, p = 0.030], (2) age [HR for 10-year age increase;= 1.12, 95% CI = 0.99-1.27, p = 0.082], and (3) years employed in logging industry [HR for 10-year increase = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.99-1.26, p = 0.052]. Seeking medical attention for injury was not a priority for this cohort, and narratives revealed a trend for self-assessment. A variety of barriers, including finances, prevented loggers from seeking medical attention. We found that loggers still experience serious, and sometimes disabling, injuries associated with their work. It was unsurprising that many injuries were due to slips, trips, and falls, along with contact with logging equipment and trees/logs. The narratives revealed various obstacles preventing loggers from achieving optimal health. Examples included geographic distance from healthcare, lack of time to access care, and entrenched values that prioritized independence and traditional masculinity. Financial considerations were also consistently cited as a primary barrier to adequate care. There is a continued need to emphasize occupational health and safety in the logging industry. Implementation of relevant safety programs is key, but it is likely that the benefits of these will not be fully realized until a cultural shift takes place within this industry.

Effect of Group Psycho-Educational Interventions on Child birth fear and Child birth Self-efficacy among Primiparous women.

Child birth related fear and low self-efficacy for child birth found common among primiparous women. Antenatal group psycho-educational interventions have been used as important strategies to address child birth fear and self-efficacy. Thus, this study aimed to find out the status of child birth fear among antenatal women and effect of group psycho-educational interventions among primiparous women. One group pretest-posttest design was adopted. Total 307 primigravida women attending antenatal outpatient department of two hospitals within Kathmandu valley were selected through purposive sampling technique. Data was collected from March to July 2020. Child birth fear was assessed by using validated tool i.e.Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) and Child birth self-efficacy was assessed by using childbirth self- efficacy tool. Primigravida women with moderate level of child-birth fear, were intervened for group psycho-education based on PRIME Model by nurses who were research team members. Paired t-test was used to compare differences in mean scores on child birth fear and child birth self-efficacy before and after intervention. Moderate level of child birth fear was found among 24.8% of participants. Low child-birth self-efficacy was found among 42.0% participants. The overall mean score before providing group psycho-educational interventions to experimental group on child-birth fear was 54.0±2.09 and on child birth self-efficacy was 78.0±28.64 with p<0.001 and after providing group psycho-educational interventions child-birth fear was reduced to 47.8±2.44 and child birth self-efficacy was 105.2±19.6 with p<0.001. Group psycho-educational interventions based on PRIME approach led by nurses have significant effects in reducing child-birth fear and increasing child-birth self-efficacy. Therefore, provision of group psycho-educational interventions along with routine antenatal service need to be considered in clinical settings in Nepalese context.

Informing the development of interventions for e-cigarette use and prevention of transition to cigarette smoking in young adults: A qualitative study

E-cigarette use in young individuals may increase risk for cigarette smoking initiation. Over half of young adults who use e-cigarettes voiced their desire to quit e-cigarettes. Mobile-based interventions may allow for an easy-to-use platform to engage young adults in cessation services and reduce risk for cigarette uptake. To inform development of such programs, this study sought to gather information about what young adults want to see included in e-cigarette cessation interventions that also target future smoking risk. Nine online focus groups (n = 33) were conducted in July and August 2022 with young adults who either (1) currently used e-cigarettes, (2) formerly used e-cigarettes, or (3) initiated nicotine use with e-cigarettes but subsequently smoked cigarettes (dual use). Two research team members independently coded the transcripts and identified themes. A third researcher independently reviewed the coding and thematic analysis. Participants believed that mobile-based interventions should include peer support, ways to track cessation progress, education about the harms of e-cigarettes, gamification, and incentivization. They also believed that to prevent future cigarette smoking, interventions need to include education about the harms of smoking, teach refusal skills for offers to smoke, and incorporate personal anecdotes from former smokers. To increase their readiness, motivation, and self-efficacy to quit, participants who continue to use e-cigarettes reported needing effective substitutions to replace e-cigarettes, barriers to hinder their access to e-cigarettes, and social support. Findings from this study may be useful to incorporate when developing interventions designed to reduce e-cigarette use and risk of progression to smoking for young adults.

Including people with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities in research and evaluation teams: A scoping review of the empirical knowledge base.

We conducted a rapid scoping review of empirical studies to identify how persons with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities have been engaged as active members of research and evaluation teams. We conducted a literature search using a systematic method that accessed peer reviewed studies in relevant library databases and all major evaluation journals. The search resulted in 6,624 potential articles, of which 32 met the inclusion criteria for this study. The findings address three categories of interest: 1) methodological underpinnings and practical justifications for using inclusive approaches, 2) different inclusion processes, and 3) reflections by researchers with and without intellectual and other cognitive disabilities. Findings provide conceptual and practical insights for researchers and evaluators when designing inclusive methods involving persons with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities. Gaps in inclusive research and evaluation are discussed and suggestions for future research are proposed.

ChatGPT Knowledge Evaluation in Basic and Clinical Medical Sciences: Multiple Choice Question Examination-Based Performance.

The Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has garnered great attention from the public, academicians and science communities. It responds with appropriate and articulate answers and explanations across various disciplines. For the use of ChatGPT in education, research and healthcare, different perspectives exist with some level of ambiguity around its acceptability and ideal uses. However, the literature is acutely lacking in establishing a link to assess the intellectual levels of ChatGPT in the medical sciences. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the knowledge level of ChatGPT in medical education both in basic and clinical medical sciences, multiple-choice question (MCQs) examination-based performance and its impact on the medical examination system. In this study, initially, a subject-wise question bank was established with a pool of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from various medical textbooks and university examination pools. The research team members carefully reviewed the MCQ contents and ensured that the MCQs were relevant to the subject's contents. Each question was scenario-based with four sub-stems and had a single correct answer. In this study, 100 MCQs in various disciplines, including basic medical sciences (50 MCQs) and clinical medical sciences (50 MCQs), were randomly selected from the MCQ bank. The MCQs were manually entered one by one, and a fresh ChatGPT session was started for each entry to avoid memory retention bias. The task was given to ChatGPT to assess the response and knowledge level of ChatGPT. The first response obtained was taken as the final response. Based on a pre-determined answer key, scoring was made on a scale of 0 to 1, with zero representing incorrect and one representing the correct answer. The results revealed that out of 100 MCQs in various disciplines of basic and clinical medical sciences, ChatGPT attempted all the MCQs and obtained 37/50 (74%) marks in basic medical sciences and 35/50 (70%) marks in clinical medical sciences, with an overall score of 72/100 (72%) in both basic and clinical medical sciences. It is concluded that ChatGPT obtained a satisfactory score in both basic and clinical medical sciences subjects and demonstrated a degree of understanding and explanation. This study's findings suggest that ChatGPT may be able to assist medical students and faculty in medical education settings since it has potential as an innovation in the framework of medical sciences and education.

Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews

Background And ObjectivesDifficulty recruiting individuals from minoritized and underserved populations for clinical research is well documented and has health equity implications. Previously, we reported findings from interviews with research staff about pediatric research recruitment processes. Respondents raised equity concerns related to recruitment and enrollment of participants from minoritized, low resourced, and underserved populations. We therefore decided to perform a secondary coding of the transcripts to examine equity-related issues systematically. MethodsWe conducted a process of secondary coding and analysis of interviews with research staff involved in recruitment for pediatric clinical research. Through consensus we identified codes relevant to equity and developed a conceptual framework including 5 stages of research. ResultsWe analyzed 28 interviews and coded equity-related items. We report 6 implications of our findings. First, inequitable access to clinical care is an upstream barrier to research participation. Second, there is a need to increase research opportunities where underserved and under-represented populations receive care. Third, increasing research team diversity can build trust with patients and families, but teams must ensure adequate support of all research team members. Fourth, issues related to consent processes raise institutional-level opportunities for improvement. Fifth, there are numerous study procedure-related barriers to participation. Sixth, our analysis illustrates that individuals who speak languages other than English face barriers across multiple stages. ConclusionsResearch staff members identified equity-related concerns and recommended potential solutions across 5 stages of the research process, which may guide those endeavoring to improve research recruitment for pediatric patients from minoritized and underserved populations.

Caregivers’ Experiences With a Web- and Mobile-Based Platform for Children With Medical Complexity and the Role of a Live Platform Coach: Thematic Analysis

Background Children with medical complexity (CMC) are individuals with complex chronic conditions who have substantial health care needs, functional limitations, and significant use of health care. By nature of their health status, they have many care providers across multiple settings, making information sharing critical to their health and safety. Connecting2gether (C2), a web- and mobile-based patient-facing platform, was codeveloped with families to support and empower parental caregivers, improve information sharing, and facilitate care delivery. C2 also provided a live platform coach to conduct parental feedback and coaching sessions, which included answering questions, providing advice on usage, and addressing technological issues. Objective This study was conducted to understand the experience of parental caregivers using the C2 platform and the role of the live platform coach. This study is a subset of a larger study assessing the feasibility of C2 in the care of CMC. Methods Parental caregivers (n=33) participated in biweekly sessions to provide feedback and receive real-time platform use support from a trained research team member acting as a live platform coach. Parental caregivers were asked about the utility and usability of C2’s features. Questions, platform issues, and feedback were recorded on a standardized electronic data collection tool. A thematic analysis was performed to analyze parental comments, and codes were categorized into key themes. The number of comments corresponding with each code was quantified. Results A total of 166 parental feedback and coaching sessions were conducted, with an average of 5 sessions per parental caregiver (range 1-7). There were 33 (85%) parental caregivers that participated in at least one coaching session. Technical issues and difficulties navigating C2 were addressed in real time during the sessions to encourage platform engagement. Four key themes were identified: (1) live platform coach, (2) barriers to platform usage and technical challenges, (3) platform requests and modifications, and (4) parent partnership and empowerment. Conclusions Parental caregivers describe C2 as a valuable tool, acting as a facilitator for enhanced care coordination and communication. Parental caregiver feedback showed that the live platform coach was a critical tool in educating on platform use and addressing technological concerns. Further study of the use of the C2 platform and its role in the care of CMC is needed to understand the possible benefits and cost-effectiveness of this technology.