Abstract This paper reports the results of a 3‐year project funded by the Manpower Services Commission/Training Agency, which ran from 1988 to 1991. The project had its origin in the difficulties encountered by TVEI courses in respect of certification by examining boards. In particular, issues relating to the moderation of teacher‐assessed coursework had come into prominence. The research brief was to develop by field‐based empirical methods a model of moderation which would aim to meet the needs of all potential users, students, teachers, moderators and the examination boards. In the course of the research the GCSE examination was introduced, followed by the National Curriculum, both of which greatly extended the scope of assessment of process and the roles of teachers in carrying it out. Using Assessment Development Officers from the seven West Country local authorities who were involved heavily with moderation, the project sought in a sustained way to clarify, test in the field, reflect upon and express coherently the evolving practice of assessment and moderation as it was experienced and understood by a range of teachers, assessors, moderators, local authority and examination board staff, researchers and trainers. Six 2‐day conferences were held over the 3‐year life of the project, with shorter meetings during the intervals to plan and direct the research activities in the field. These in turn reinforced the shared, collaborative activities that took place at the conferences and enabled continuous refinement of the assessment principles and the associated model of moderation to take place. The paper is based on the final report of the project. The neglected area of moderation is examined and related to the wider experience of assessment in current conditions. It takes note of the rapid growth of interest in attempts to include recognition of process as well as end‐products of learning and teaching in the certification of students’ achievements at all levels. The assumptions and experiences on which the model rests are examined and a brief version of the model is included. Some responses from participants in the dissemination conference sponsored by the Training Agency are also considered. The importance of course planning, teaching, assessment and moderation as an integrated process is stressed, the roles of teachers and moderators in moderation meetings are discussed in the light of the model, as well as the conduct of moderation meetings and the whole‐institution policies that would be essential for successful implementation. The model is seen as capable of application across all phases of the National Curriculum and beyond.
Read full abstract