Research Agenda Research Articles

Co-designing Medication Optimization Patient-Centered Outcomes Research With Older People and Caregivers as Research Partners.

Background: Additional evidence is required to address the unintended consequences of medication use in older people and the required caregiver support. To inform priorities for future research efforts, different stakeholder perspectives are needed, including those of older people, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Objective: To develop a co-designed medication-related research agenda. Methods: A 12-member Advisory Council, half of which were older people and caregivers, designed the research. An 11-question survey to identify priorities for medication-related patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) topics was administered to members of the Elder Care Medicine Network (ECMN) (ie, older people, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers). Respondents were categorized into two groups with hierarchical assignment to the clinician/research group over the older adult/caregiver group. Chi-square tests compared priority areas for medication-related PCOR between the two groups. Results: There were 53 responses (48% response rate) from the ECMN, with 39.6% (n = 21) from the clinician/researcher group and 60.4% (n = 32) from the older adult/caregiver group. The priority areas from both groups included safe ways to simplify medicines (62.2%), communicating with pharmacists and prescribers about medications (58.5%), and information about safe supplements with prescription medications (52.8%). Statistically significant differences existed between the two groups in the proportions choosing the priority areas. Conclusion: Co-design of a survey to identify priority areas for PCOR demonstrated successful engagement of older people and caregivers as research partners. While older people and caregivers may have differing perspectives on the importance of specific medication-related PCOR topics, simplifying medication regimen and health care communications were germane to both groups.

Welfare ruination, debris and Europeans’ make-shift practices: A research agenda

The mainstream literature on welfare retrenchment, austerity and post-welfare states proposes that since the mid 1970s, welfare states are in a state of ‘permanent austerity’. To offer an alternative to such stories of loss and their problematic nostalgic retelling of recent European history, leaving out its imperial histories, this article proposes to look instead at welfare as the object of ruination. This approach builds on literatures that focus on the experience of austerity and institutional violence to take a step further towards everyday responsive practices. Building on the work of Ann Laura Stoler, studying ruination and debris opens up the possibility to look at (1) the long durée of the colonial heritage of welfare, (2) ruination as an active and violent process and (3) welfare debris and how European dwellers use it and live in it. For Europeans, living amidst ruins and in a time of ruination, then, the question is: how can they build a life with the welfare debris that they are left with? Who is able to navigate the ruins and who is not? For researchers, this perspective can inform a new research agenda: a redirection of attention from welfare as ‘organized provision’ to, instead, how people organize the provisional, improvising with the rubble that remains.

Sky-High Style: An Overview and Research Agenda on Aesthetic Labour in the Airline Industry from a Gender Perspective

Sky-High Style: An Overview and Research Agenda on Aesthetic Labour in the Airline Industry from a Gender Perspective

The relationship between audit committees, external auditors, and internal control systems: a literature review and a research agenda

Purpose This paper aims to focus on the relationship between audit committees, external auditors and internal control systems (ICS) and strives to point out mutual influences between the instances to provide an integrated perspective for firms’ multilateral monitoring mechanisms. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the incorporation of sustainability and fraud considerations into the traditional roles of audit committees and auditors. Design/methodology/approach This structured literature review is based on 71 empirical-quantitative studies published in high-quality journals between 2005 and 2022. Considering the classification of ICS into ICS quality and internal audit function, the studies are analyzed with regard to audit committees’ and external auditors’ characteristics, divided into incentives and competencies, as well as their mutual relationships. Findings This study highlights a dynamic trilateral network of relationships between monitoring authorities and primarily shows that audit committees equipped with adequate competencies generate a substitutive effect for external auditors by reducing their efforts, whereas ICS quality serves as a possible mediator in this network of relationships. The establishment of an integrative three-party coalition of competent and adequately incentivized monitoring parties is essential to guarantee sufficient and appropriate ICS and overall corporate governance quality. Practical implications The findings should prompt legislators and firms to ensure a deeper collaboration between audit committees, internal auditors and external auditors to generate synergy effects and economies of scale within the integrative monitoring process. Legislators should develop stricter requirements for competencies of audit committees and auditors. These should include a holistic triad of sustainability, fraud and digital expertise as well as mandatory forensic procedures performed by all monitoring bodies. Originality/value The authors contribute to prior research by highlighting the importance of an integrative three-party coalition of monitoring authorities to ensure corporate governance quality and to generate synergy effects within a dynamic multilateral monitoring process. Furthermore, the authors offer cutting-edge implications by stressing the need for consideration of sustainability and fraud aspects in the traditional work and profiles of audit committees and auditors.

The multi-level politics of countering democratic backsliding: state of the art and new research directions

ABSTRACT After more than a decade of inaction or, at best, using soft instruments, the EU has become more assertive against democratic backsliding in member states. This special issue adopts a multi-level perspective to tackle the new research avenues that arise from this change in EU policy. Its contributions investigate two broad questions: first, the causes of this policy change, and second, its potential domestic impact in the backsliding countries. Focused on the EU level, a first set of articles revisits and refines existing accounts of EU inaction in order to explain the EU’s recent turn towards greater assertiveness. A second set of contributions concentrates mainly on the domestic level to explore the potential impact of the EU’s efforts to counter democratic backsliding in the member states that are the targets of EU actions. This introduction identifies the main themes of this new research agenda, provides an overview of the individual contributions to the special issue and their main insights, and sketches avenues for further research on countering democratic backsliding in the EU.

Structuring live stream commerce: A study on classification, framework development, and future research agendas

This study aims to address the existing gaps in Live Stream Commerce (LSC) research by focusing on understanding the variety of LSC platforms and user motivations and behaviors within these platforms. To achieve this aim, a practical and strategic analytical framework is proposed. This framework comprehensively explores the classification of LSC and its supply and demand aspects, providing a detailed description of its phenomena, characteristics, participants, and operational methods. Furthermore, this study identifies new research directions, including investigating consumer behavior and marketing strategies across different platform types, analyzing the impact of algorithms on behavior, examining discrepancies in LSC development between East and West, exploring the integration of LSC supply chains, and assessing the influence of LSC on traditional e-commerce. Overall, this framework aims to guide future research endeavors, benefiting both academics and industry professionals.

Consumer Perspectives on Food Traceability—A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

ABSTRACTFood traceability is a critical approach that ensures the safety and quality of food. It has garnered significant attention, particularly in the aftermath of multiple food safety incidents reported in various countries. While there is extant literature available on consumer perspectives on food traceability, the findings are not consistent across studies. This systematic literature review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding by integrating findings from past studies. It includes 61 articles sourced from two databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science. This review outlines various stages of a consumer's decision for food traceability, starting from exposure, awareness, understanding, liking and disliking, attitudes and preferences, purchase intentions and willingness to pay, to the final purchase. It also identifies the determinants of consumer responses to food traceability, categorising them as factors internal to the consumers, determinants due to the perception of external factors and contextual factors. Moreover, it identifies gaps in the existing research and proposes research questions to expand the knowledge in this area.

The trajectory of artificial intelligence for competency-based personalised learning: past, present and future

PurposeThe study aims to reflect on past research, uncover current trends and propose a future research agenda in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) for competency-based personalised learning.Design/methodology/approachThe study followed the SPAR-4-SLR protocol to retrieve 855 articles related to the field indexed in the Scopus database. Performance analysis, network analysis and science mapping were then performed using VOSviewer and the Biblioshiny app.FindingsThe analysis identified nine clusters of intellectual structure (healthcare, competencies, learning systems, digital transformation, AI literacy, computer-aided education, AI ethics, e-learning and active learning) and twelve themes (including motor, basic, emerging and niche).Originality/valueFollowing an extensive review of the literature, this would appear to be the first study to provide a panoramic view of AI for competency-based personalised learning based on the Scopus database. The core gaps in the current literature have been identified and the corresponding future agenda will be instrumental in shaping future research directions in the field.

Personality traits, interests, and values in medical students: a proposal for a vocational assessment tool for specialty choice

Choosing a medical specialty is a complex, multifactorial process, influenced by a range of factors, including personal motivations, experiences during medical school, job opportunities and remuneration, career stability, availability of residency positions, personality traits, cultural values, sociodemographic factors, and others. The increasing number of medical graduates directly impacts this decision, intensifying competition for residency positions. Universities play a key role in guiding graduates through this decision-making process. However, further research is needed to assist both teachers and students in identifying the most relevant factors influencing this choice. This study aims to explore these factors, considering the individual characteristics of both the medical student and the specialist doctor. It represents the initial step in a research agenda that seeks to develop a psychometric vocational tool to aid in selecting a medical specialty.

Creating (with) community: The value of collaboration in peace Science

This essay examines the roles of collaboration and challenging assumptions as key mechanisms for generating and developing research agendas in Peace Science. Successfully challenging assumptions requires that we identify meaningful differences from reality, show that retaining an assumption is problematic, and that the change has effects on outcomes we care about. Working with collaborators has important effects on our ability to question assumptions as we ask research questions, build theory, and create data.

Presidential Address: Metallurgical slags: A drive to circularity and search for new research agenda

Poor phase separation and fine dissemination of the desired components within congruous slag phases are key challenges limiting the recoverability of values from slags by conventional beneficiation methods. Slag microstructure conditioning is a pragmatic approach to increasing the value-in-use of discard slags, especially when integrated with the broader smelter infrastructure. Although not yet tested on oxide slag systems, this paper explores the potential application of magnetohydrodynamic principles to the crystallization behaviour of bulk slags. Integrating the slag microstructure conditioning infrastructure to the existing smelter infrastructure is key to unlocking the economic value of slags because it is most economic to condition the properties of molten slag directly after tapping. A new business model that integrates smelting units to transversal economic activities, such as cement production and suppliers of construction aggregates, can significantly increase the circularity of metallurgical slags.

Peer editing and writing proficiency: an experimental study in South Korean higher education

ABSTRACT Peer editing enhances critical thinking, improves student writing, ultimately leading to a more productive learning environment (Kostopoulou and O’Dwyer 2021; Lundstrom and Baker 2009, “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18:30–43; Storch 2018, “Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda.” Language Teaching 51 (02): 262–277; Yao et al. 2021, “How university EFL writers’ beliefs in writing ability impact their perceptions of peer assessment: Perspectives from implicit theories of intelligence.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 151–167). However, reservations toward peer feedback in a university EFL setting persist due to the accuracy of L2 feedback (Braine, 2003; Erdel 2023, “Student feedback literacy (SFL) profiles in an L2 writing classroom and the influence of peer feedback on the SFL features.” International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 11 (3): 112–125.). This study utilized a pretest-posttest writing assessment to analyze differences in writing outcomes in an academic research writing course at two universities in Seoul, South Korea. The researchers also examined the accuracy of the L2 peer-editing feedback. The sampling consisted of five randomized classes of university undergraduates. Two control groups received feedback via the instructor and two experimental groups received peer-editing feedback. A fifth mixed group was divided between the control and experimental groups but within the same context. The instructors used both in-class and online feedback tools for the control and experimental groups. The analysis used Sengupta’s (1998, “Peer evaluation: ‘I am not the teacher’.” ELT Journal 52 (1): 19–28) revision taxonomy to assess peer feedback accuracy. Participants completed separate pretest and posttest writing assessments. One at the start of the semester (pretest) and one at the end (posttest). The researchers used a MANOVA to compare the pretest and posttest mean average assessment scores between the control and experimental groups. The results show that peer feedback matches the effectiveness of professor feedback for pretest/posttest scores. Researchers also assessed 156 peer-editing assignments for feedback accuracy. Peer editors demonstrated statistically significant accuracy. This study recommends using peer feedback for its benefits to L2 learners and instructors.

THE COLLECTIVE HUMAN RIGHT TO HISTORICAL REPARATION VERSUS THE PRECLUSION OF THE RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE AREA OF STATE LIABILITY

It is unanimous in International Law that anyone who has committed an unlawful act must make reparations. However, there has been an increasingly pressing debate over whether it is possible to hold colonial powers legally liable for acts and crimes committed in the past in their former colonies. The rules of international liability indicate, among other issues, that time has already exerted its preclusive influence on possible claims for reparations, according to the rules of intertemporal law, which leads one to believe that International Law still seems incapable of helping those who were colonized and enslaved, since in practice the issue of the collective human right to historical reparations versus the preclusion of the retroactive application of International Law in matters of State liability is being discussed. However, some issues have arisen recently, such as the recent statement by the then Portuguese president, recognizing Portugal's responsibility for enslavement and crimes that occurred during the colonial period. Thus, and given the context of the current scenario, we seem to be witnessing an important historical step in a larger political-legal process. It seems premature to talk about a collective human right to historical reparation, however, it seems that a period of long and important debate is beginning, which is on the agenda of major newspapers, social networks and academic research. Thus, this movement may lead in some way to effective reparation for the serious violations committed in the past.

Farmers' Perceptions and Practices in Managing Vegetable Pests and Pesticide Use in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia: In the Case of the Koga Irrigation System

This experiment was carried out to assessment of farmers’ perceptions, knowledge, and current management practices on the major pests among vegetable growers in the Koga irrigation system, Ethiopia. Understanding the farmers’ awareness and pest management is essential for designing a research agenda, and awareness creation. The survey was carried out from November 2020 to March 2021 in Koga irrigation, with a total of 63 vegetable growers. A semi-structured questionnaire was used. Almost all farmers in the study area overwhelmingly depend on pesticides to control the pests on their vegetable crops. Profenofos, Dimethoate, and Lambda-cyhalothrin were dominantly and commonly used insecticides in the study area with different trade names for more than two vegetables. There are two common and widely used fungicides named Metalaxyl-M 68 %WG and Mancozeb regarding disease control. The farmers used wrong application techniques, inappropriate spraying, wrong storage practices, and protective measure of pesticides. This wrong perception and practice could be associated with their limited knowledge about pesticides and related activities. Hence, it is recommended that government or non-governmental organizations should focus to improve the misuse and misperception of farmers in pesticide use, including personal and environmental protection through education and community intervention.

An alcohol-related liver disease multi-stakeholder hub (ARMS-Hub) to enhance research activity in underserved communities in the UK.

Alcohol use is the third leading risk factor of death and disability in the UK and costs the NHS £3.5 billion per year. Despite the high prevalence and healthcare burden of Alcohol-related Liver Disease (ArLD), there has been minimal research addressing prevention, morbidity and mortality. Reasons for this include stigma and lack of interest from public, charitable and commercial funding bodies. The objectives of this project were to identify and develop interdisciplinary partnerships, to explore stigma in ArLD, to develop a representative Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) group, to build research capacity, and to develop interdisciplinary research proposals targeting key research priorities. ArLD networks were identified by members of the Project Steering Group. Health Care Professionals (HCPs) from different backgrounds were invited to join the ARMS-Hub. PPIE representatives were invited through charities and support groups. Research areas were identified, discussed, prioritised and ranked. Research questions were refined during an in-person symposium. A mentorship programme was created to encourage and facilitate networking and knowledge exchange for early career researchers. We established the ARMS-Hub with 31 HCPs and 40 PPIE members. There were five stakeholder meetings, which included PPIE representation. Three virtual and three in-person PPIE meetings took place. Topics relevant to stigma in ARLD identified during the meetings were education and awareness, language, and access. Priorities identified were the disconnect between mental health and liver services, education around the wider harms of alcohol, and education of HCPs regarding stigma. We established a mentorship network that regularly meets to support development of new research ideas. Stigma is central to lack of research engagement from professionals and PPIE. The main priority identified relates to the disconnect between mental health and liver services. This collaborative study has allowed development of a research agenda to address this priority.

Embedding voices of under-served communities in Health Research Priority Setting in Thailand

Health research is needed to develop new treatments, diagnostic methods and prevention strategies for many diseases, but resources are limited particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our proposed project involves in-depth engagement with community advisory boards and existing community groups in healthcare research priority setting in Thailand. We will use Wellcome’s “Responsive Dialogues” engagement approach, focusing on “underserved” groups, as their voices are seldom heard in healthcare research priority setting. We estimate that we will engage with 6–8 community groups involving 48–80 participants. Our objectives are firstly, to contribute to the health research agenda setting in Thailand for government, non-governmental actors, academia, and others who conduct health research in the next 5 to 10 years. Secondly, we aim to identify ethical and practical issues related to healthcare research priority setting, specifically in relation to involving under-served communities.

3.A. Round table: Towards a research agenda for burden of disease studies

Abstract What are the most relevant diseases in a country? Which risk factors are the strongest contributors to disease and death? How is the impact of different diseases evolving over time, and how does it compare between countries and within subnational units? As the need for prioritising the use of available resources constantly increases, a timely, sound and comprehensive answer to these fundamental questions is more than ever needed to inform public health decision-making. Driven by the impact of the Global Burden of Disease study, several researchers and national and international health institutes have adopted the burden of disease approach to address these questions. The complexity of the burden of disease approach however resulted in major disparities in research capacity across Europe. Furthermore, the current burden of disease landscape remains scattered, and researchers struggle to translate their findings to decision makers. The European Burden of Disease Network (COST Action CA18218) addresses these challenges by acting as a technical platform for integrating and strengthening capacity in burden of disease assessment across Europe and beyond. The different activities of the Network have helped to improve the quality and comparability of burden of disease estimates and increase their use in policy and practice. However, still many challenges remain. As a way of looking into the future applications of the burden of disease metrics, the European Burden of Disease Network took the initiative of developing a research agenda based on barriers and weaknesses identified within the activities of the network and input from researchers working regularly with burden of disease. As an initial step, a series of systematic literature review was carried to identify barriers and weaknesses in the computation of burden of disease estimates. These highlighted the differences in methodological choices that could hamper the comparability of results. This point was later identified as a key element of future development (abstract one). Secondly, the members of the network were consulted. Online questionnaires and structured consultations led to the identification of four main pillars of the future research agenda: transparency and availability, refining current methods, new applications, and prioritization of topics. In this workshop, we will present different activities within and outside the Network that correspond to the four pillars above described (abstract 2-4) and start the reflection on the future of burden of disease estimated. Key messages • Despite the wide use of the burden of disease approach, many challenges were identified in the replication of the methods and the need for further developments. • A new research agenda for burden of disease estimates will formalize a way to strengthen methodologies, interpretations and applications.

The state-of-the-art and barriers for the adoption of personalised prevention in Europe and beyond

Abstract Personalized prevention is a priority of the European Commission’s research agenda, exemplified by the EU-funded project ‘a PeRsonalised Prevention roadmap for the future HEalThcare’ (PROPHET), a coordination and support action of the International Consortium for Personalized Medicine. It aims to bolster health systems in implementing innovative, sustainable, and high-quality personalized strategies to prevent chronic diseases. In this context, a scoping review was conducted to map personalized preventive approaches (PPA) for chronic diseases and obstacles to their adoption worldwide. The review followed the Arksey-O’Malley guidelines and was conducted from January 2017 to December 2023, on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and grey literature. Eligible studies were primary reports and guidelines, while for the barriers to their adoption we included literature reviews. We included 120 documents on approaches and 34 reviews on barriers. Among the former, 251 PPA were identified: 69% on cancer, 21% on cardiovascular diseases, and 10% on neurological, psychiatric, and metabolic diseases. Furthermore, 27% were on primary prevention, using omic biomarkers to predict disease risk and guide preventive strategies; 27% on secondary prevention, using genomics to guide screening programs; 46% on tertiary prevention, using pharmacogenomics or targeted therapies to prevent disease complications. Among the 34 reviews on barriers, the majority were about the lack of clinical utility evidence and research needs, ethical and legal issues, and limited knowledge among health professionals, citizens, and patients. The majority of the barriers (76%) were referred to primary and secondary prevention, consistent with the low rates of existing approaches in these areas. Ongoing efforts show promise for tailoring prevention strategies, but further research and integration are needed to maximize their potential in improving population health and reducing chronic disease burdens on health systems.

Work-life balance, career motivation and women: a systematic literature review and research agenda in the Indian context

Work-life balance, career motivation and women: a systematic literature review and research agenda in the Indian context

A comparative analysis of national dementia plans: preventive strategies in five European countries

Abstract Background About 8.5% of people aged +65 live with dementia in Europe. Preventive measures can avert up to 40% of cases. The aim of the study is to analyse National Dementia Plans (NDP) in Europe, to elicit how much dementia prevention is considered a priority and whether policies are evidence-based. Methods A qualitative comparative analysis was performed between NDPs of countries with the best healthy life expectancy in the elderly in Europe. The NDPs of France, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and Sweden were included. The consensus on actions and elements of prevention policies was evaluated, according to the WHO recommendations and to Cheung’s framework designed for evaluating chronic diseases policies. Results All the NDPs prioritised early diagnosis, public awareness, and community engagement for dementia risk reduction. They fostered the development of information system for data collection and established committees for progress monitoring. However, not all NDPs defined timelines for policy implementation and most of them expired years ago. NDPs included prevention research agenda, but their preventive actions did not address alcohol consumption, traumatic brain injury, and air pollution, representing 3 well-known risk factors attributable for the 15% of preventable cases. Neither integration of dementia with other chronic disease preventive strategies was present and a clear allocation of funds for NDPs always missed. Conclusions NDPs partially address risk factors of preventable cases. All countries need to update their NDPs, integrating new scientific evidence and allocating clear financial funds. This can potentially prevent millions of new cases, decreasing the burden of disease and improving the sustainability of health systems. Key messages • NDPs do not target adequately dementia in Europe. • New evidence-based preventive policies, including most recent identified risk factors, would have a clear impact on burden of disease and health systems’ sustainability.