Rescue Medication Research Articles

Opioids and Cannabinoids in Neurology Practice.

Opioid and cannabinoid therapies for chronic pain conditions including neuropathic pain are controversial. Understanding patient and prescribing factors contributing to risks and implementing risk mitigation strategies optimizes outcomes. The ongoing transformation from a biomedical model of pain care toward a biopsychosocial model has been accompanied by a shift away from opioid therapy for pain, in particular for chronic pain. Opioid overdose deaths and opioid use disorder have greatly increased in the last several decades, initially because of increases in opioid prescribing and more recently associated with illicit drug use, in particular fentanyl derivatives. Opioid risk mitigation strategies may reduce risks related to opioid prescribing and tapering or discontinuation. Opioid therapy guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have become the consensus best practice for opioid therapy. Regulatory agencies and licensing medical boards have implemented restrictions and other mandates regarding opioid therapy. Meanwhile, interest in and use of cannabinoids for chronic pain has grown in the United States. Opioid therapy is generally not recommended for the chronic treatment of neuropathic pain conditions. Opioids may be considered for temporary use in patients with severe pain related to selected neuropathic pain conditions (such as postherpetic neuralgia), and only as part of a multimodal treatment regimen. Opioid risk mitigation strategies include careful patient selection and evaluation, patient education and informed consent, querying the state prescription drug monitoring programs, urine drug testing, and issuance of naloxone as potential rescue medication. Close follow-up when initiating or adjusting opioid therapy and frequent reevaluation during long-term opioid therapy is required. There is evidence for the efficacy of cannabinoids for neuropathic pain, with meaningful response rates in select patient populations.

Efficiency and safety of high-dose undiluted intravenous push levetiracetam loading doses compared to intravenous infusion in seizing patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Intravenous (IV) push (IVP) is an alternative administration method for levetiracetam, but evidence evaluating it compared to IV piggyback (IVPB) for loading doses in acutely seizing patients is limited, particularly in patients with status epilepticus (SE). This study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of IVP versus IVPB levetiracetam loading doses. This was a single-center sequential retrospective study conducted in adult (≥18 years) patients who received an IV levetiracetam loading dose (>2000 mg or ≥20 mg/kg) for acute or suspected seizure. The primary outcome was time to administration, compared between doses given as IVP versus IVPB. Secondary outcomes included rates of adverse events (AEs), rescue benzodiazepine or antiseizure medication administration, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission between groups. A total of 246 patients were included; 116 received IVP and 130 received IVPB loading doses. Median age was 56 years; most patients were male (62%) and White (60%) and had witnessed seizures (67%). Doses were administered for SE in 32 (27.5%) and 46 (35.4%) patients in the IVP and IVPB arms, respectively. Median time to administration was shorter in the IVP group (12 vs. 38 min, p < .001). Bradycardia (1.7% vs. 2.3%, p = .99), hypotension (7.8% vs. 12%, p = .30), sedation (6% vs. 12.3%, p = .09), intubation (10% vs. 8%, p = .37), ICU admission (32% vs. 39%, p = .31), and rescue medication administration (8.6% vs. 14.6% p = .10) were similar between groups. In SE patients, IVP was associated with shorter time to administration (12 vs. 44 min, p = .003) and lower odds of ICU admission after adjustment for age, dose, Status Epilepticus Severity Score, and seizure history (adjusted odds ratio = .23, 95% confidence interval = .06-.81). IVP reduced time to levetiracetam administration versus IVPB and was not associated with more AEs. Rescue agent use, intubation, and ICU admission were similar between arms, but IVP may reduce ICU admissions in SE patients. Prospective studies should assess the effectiveness of IVP versus IVPB.

Efficacy and safety of SKCPT in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled phase III clinical trial

Ethnopharmacological relevanceOsteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent type of arthritis worldwide and a leading cause of years lost to pain and disability. Among the current pharmacological treatments for OA, symptomatic slow-acting drugs for OA (SYSADOA) induce pain relief and aim to improve joint function by relieving inflammation while causing fewer gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). SKCPT is a herbal SYSADOA formulated from Clematis mandshurica, Trichosanthes kirilowii, and Prunella vulgaris powdered extracts. This preparation has been shown to induce cartilage protection and anti-inflammatory effects in preclinical studies and inhibit glycosaminoglycan degradation and catabolic gene expression in human OA chondrocytes and cartilage. Aim of the studyWe aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of SKCPT to celecoxib and safety for treating knee OA. Materials and methodsThis multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial enrolled adults with primary knee OA who were randomized (1:1) to SKCPT 300 mg twice daily or celecoxib 200 mg once daily for 12 weeks. ResultsIn total, 278 patients were assigned to treatment (SKCPT, 136; celecoxib, 142) for approximately 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change of Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (K-WOMAC) pain subscale scores from baseline to Day 84. The mean change (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error) from baseline to Day 84 was −23.74 ± 1.48 for SKCPT and −25.88 ± 1.44 for celecoxib. The two-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference (LS mean) between groups was [−1.94, 6.20], confirming that the upper limit was less than the non-inferiority margin of 10. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the secondary endpoints (mean changes of K-WOMAC pain, physical, stiffness subscale, and total score, and the frequency and number of doses of rescue medications) between groups at all time points. Differences between groups in adverse events and adverse drug reactions were not significant, and no serious adverse events occurred. ConclusionsSKCPT efficacy was non-inferior, and its safety profile was similar, to celecoxib. Building on previous results showing that SYSADOA reduce NSAID intake, the present results suggest that the SYSADOA SKCPT could effectively replace NSAIDs in knee OA treatment while avoiding long-term side effects.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists as Second-Line Treatment in Children With Ongoing Immune Thrombocytopenia

What Is the Issue? Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by low platelets and an increase in bleeding risk; in the pediatric population, the reported incidence rate varies between 2 and 5 per 100,000 children per year. Spontaneous remission may be observed in up to 70% of patients, while 20% of patients may experience severe bleeding symptoms. In children whose ITP does not respond to first-line corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), or anti-D immunoglobulin, guidelines recommend the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), i.e., eltrombopag or romiplostim (avatrombopag did not have a marketing authorization and Notice of Compliance at the time that the review was initiated). Rituximab is considered a subsequent-line of therapy. Splenectomy is not usually considered an appropriate treatment option in children. The goal of therapy in pediatric patients with ITP is to reduce bleeding and improve quality of life. Platelet response is considered a valid and appropriate surrogate end point in studies and routine assessment in clinical practice. Children whose ITP does not respond to available first-line drugs may require subsequent treatment with off-label drugs because they do not have access to TPO-RAs. What Did We Do? We searched key resources, including journal citation databases, and conducted a focused internet search for relevant evidence. A systematic review of the literature identified 5 studies (4 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 1 observational study), which were synthesized narratively. The review addressed the following policy questions: In children with ongoing, active ITP, what is the overall body of evidence supporting the use of TPO-RAs and rituximab after failure of first-line therapies? Based on the level and quality of clinical evidence, should TPO-RAs be reimbursed for use earlier in the treatment sequencing for children with ongoing, active ITP, instead of being reimbursed only after a course of rituximab? What Did We Find? Evidence from 2 RCTs (n = 159) suggests that eltrombopag likely increases and maintains platelet response over time, in addition to decreasing the use of rescue medication and clinically significant bleeding compared to placebo, which were considered clinically meaningful outcomes for pediatric patients with ITP. There was a low risk of bias in the studies, but uncertainty was introduced due to the small sample sizes. Evidence from 1 RCT (n = 62) suggests that romiplostim may also increase and maintain platelet response, as well as reduce clinically significant bleeding compared to placebo. However, there was some concern due to a high risk of bias in the studies and uncertainty due to the small sample size, which suggests a need for caution in the interpretation of the findings. The effectiveness of rituximab was inconclusive due to the lack of evidence, as no comparative RCTs could be identified, while the observational study included presented only descriptive comparisons. No evidence was identified in support of trying rituximab before accessing TPO-RAs. What Does This Mean? Given that ITP is rare in children, there is a gap in available relevant evidence, and robust evidence from large RCTs in this patient population are unlikely to be conducted. Jurisdictions may consider requesting an implementation advice panel for use of eltrombopag and romiplostim after failure of first-line therapies in children with ongoing, active ITP.

Correlation of Vitamin D Levels with Severity of Asthma in Children Between 6 to 12 Years

Background: Millions of children worldwide suffer from chronic asthma, a serious respiratory disease that has a major influence on everyday living and health outcomes. There are significant public health concerns regarding the estimated 10-15% frequency of asthma in children in India. Vitamin D, which is recognized for its immunomodulatory qualities, according to recent studies reduces the severity. In this study, children aged 6 to 12 years old's vitamin D levels and the severity of their asthma were examined. Materials and Methods: At a tertiary care teaching hospital, 100 children between the ages of 6 and 12 who were presenting with acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma were the subjects of a prospective cohort study from August 2021 to August 2022. ELISA was used to evaluate serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, and the GINA recommendations were used to determine the severity of asthma. Based on their levels of vitamin D, the kids were divided into three groups: sufficient (&gt;30 ng/mL), insufficient (20–30 ng/mL), and deficient (&lt;20 ng/mL). Children who were deficient in vitamin D were given supplements and monitored for three months. With SPSS 27, statistical analysis was carried out. Findings: The results of the study showed a strong correlation between increased asthma severity and inadequate asthma control and reduced vitamin D levels. Children with the most acute and uncontrollably asthmatic episodes were those with low vitamin D levels (&lt;20 ng/mL). Significant improvements in asthma control, decreased activity limits, and decreased need for rescue medication were noted after three months of vitamin D administration. Conclusion: This study shows a clear link between children's asthma control issues and higher asthma severity when there is a vitamin D Deficiency. Supplementing with vitamin D significantly improved asthma outcomes, indicating a possible therapeutic role for this nutrient. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended to validate these findings and further elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Efficacy and safety of fentanyl inhalant for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundBreakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) has a negative impact on patients’ quality of life, general activities, and is related to worse clinical outcomes. Fentanyl inhalant is a hand-held combination drug-device delivery system providing rapid, multi-dose (25μg/dose) administration of fentanyl via inhalation of a thermally generated aerosol. This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-crossover, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fentanyl inhalant in treating BTcP in opioid-tolerant patients.MethodsThe trial was conducted in opioid-tolerant cancer patients with 1 ~ 4 BTcP outbursts per day. Each patient was treated and observed for 6 episodes of BTcP (4 with fentanyl inhalant, 2 with placebo). During each episode of targeted BTcP, patients were allowed up to six inhalations, with an interval of at least 4 min between doses. Primary outcome was the time-weighted sum of PID (pain intensity difference) scores at 30 min (SPID30).ResultsA total of 335 BTcP episodes in 59 patients were treated. The mean SPID30 was -97.4 ± 48.43 for fentanyl inhalant-treated episodes, and -64.6 ± 40.25 for placebo-treated episodes (p < 0.001). Significant differences in PID for episodes treated with fentanyl inhalant versus placebo was seen as early as 4 min and maintained for up to 60 min. The percentage of episodes reported PI (pain intensity) scores ≤ 3, a ≥ 33% or ≥ 50% reduction in PI scores at 30 min, PR30 (pain relief scores at 30 min) and SPID60 favored fentanyl inhalant over placebo. Only 4.4% of BTcP episodes required rescue medication in fentanyl inhalant group. Most AEs were of mild or moderate severity and typical of opioid drugs.ConclusionTreatment with fentanyl inhalant was shown to be a promising therapeutic option for BTcP, with significant pain relief starting very soon after dosing. Confirmation of effectiveness requires a larger phase III trial.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05531422 registered on 6 September 2022 after major amendment, NCT04713189 registered on 14 January 2021.

Association of reductions in rescue medication requirements with vagus nerve stimulation: Results of long-term community collected data from a seizure diary app

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on quality of life contributors such as rescue medications. MethodsUsing the seizure diary application SeizureTracker™ database, we examined trends in rescue administration frequency before and after the first recorded VNS magnet swipe in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who had 1) At least one VNS magnet swipe recorded in the diary, and 2) Recorded usage of a benzodiazepine rescue medication (RM) within 90 days prior to the first swipe. A paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess changes in RM usage frequency between 30-, 60-, 90-, 180- and 360-day intervals beginning 30 days after first magnet swipe. Longitudinal changes in RM usage frequency were assessed with a generalized estimating equation model. ResultsWe analyzed data of 95 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Median baseline seizure frequency was 8.3 seizures per month, with median baseline rescue medication usage frequency of 2.1 administrations per month (SD 3.3). Significant reductions in rescue medication usage were observed in the 91 to 180 day interval after first VNS magnet swipe, and at 181 to 360 days and at 361 to 720 days, with the magnitude of reduction increasing over time. Decreases in rescue medication usage were sustained when controlling for patients who did not record rescue medication use after the first VNS magnet swipe (N=91). Significant predictors of reductions in rescue medication included baseline frequency of rescue medication usage and time after first VNS magnet swipe. SignificanceThis retrospective analysis suggests that usage of rescue medications is reduced following the start of VNS treatment in patients with epilepsy, and that the magnitude of reduction may progressively increase over time.

52251 Remibrutinib reduces CSU symptoms and rescue medication use in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria despite absence of background medication

52251 Remibrutinib reduces CSU symptoms and rescue medication use in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria despite absence of background medication

Dexamethasone-Sparing Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Highly and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: The SHEILD Study.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) significantly impacts patient's quality of life and treatment adherence. This study investigated the efficacy of Generic Netupitant and Palonosetron tablets (Nykron) with dexamethasone single dose for CINV prophylaxis in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).Additionally, this approach aligns with the principles of the SHIELD study (Sparing High Efficacy Intervention for Low Dose Dexamethasone), which focuses on maximizing antiemetic effectiveness while minimizing dexamethasone use. This multicenter retrospective study evaluates data from patients who received HEC/MECand were administered a fixed-dose combination of Generic NEPA (Netupitant 300 mg and Palonosetron 0.5 mg tablets, Nykron combi-pack) along with a single dose of dexamethasone (12 mg/8 mg) before chemotherapy. The data were collected from September 2022 till September 2023. Outcomes measuredincluded complete response (no vomiting and no need for rescue medications), complete protection (no significant nausea (<2.5 cm on VAS), no vomiting, and no use of rescue medication), and complete control (no emetic episodes, no rescue therapy, and no nausea [0 cm on VAS])during the acute phase (0-24 hours) and delayed phase (24-120 hours) post-chemotherapy. The data of 372 patients was evaluated in which breast cancer was the most common cancer with 223 (59.95%) patients for which doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (192, 51.61%) was the most administered chemotherapy combination. The second most common cancer was gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with stomach cancer in 47 (12.6%), colorectal cancer in 4 (1%), and pancreatic cancer in 2 (0.54%). A total of 360 (96.8%) patients received an HEC regimen across the cycle, while only 5 (1.3%) received an MEC regimen. The regimen demonstrated exceptional efficacy with a 96.9% overall response rate across all cycles. Complete control rates for acute CINV were 92% and 90% for delayed CINV across chemotherapy cycles. Complete response rates remained consistently high (94%-98%) across all cycles and overall phases. Only 3% of patients experienced anticipatory CINV. This dexamethasone-sparing Generic NEPA regimen showed remarkable efficacy in CINV management for HEC/MEC regimen-receiving patients, maintaining high response rates in both acute and delayed across all cycles. These findings indicate a potential paradigm shift in CINV prophylaxis, necessitating further investigation through prospective, randomized controlled trials to validate long-term safety and efficacy.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of olanzapine-based prophylactic antiemetic therapy for delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting in patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: ERICA study (WJOG14320B)

Nausea and vomiting are common adverse events associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). We evaluated the efficacy of an olanzapine-based triplet regimen for preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving first cycle T-DXd. This multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (ERICA) phase II study enrolled patients with HER2-positive/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer receiving their first cycle of T-DXd. Patients were randomized to olanzapine 5 mg or placebo once daily (1:1 ratio) from Day 1 to 6, plus a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3-receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA) and dexamethasone 6.6 mg intravenously or 8 mg orally on Day 1. The total observation period was 504 hours (21 days) from the first T-DXd administration. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emetic events and no rescue medications, in the delayed phase (24-120 hours post-T-DXd), with the type I error rate of 0.2 (one-sided) for the comparison. Secondary endpoints included no nausea rate in the delayed and persistent phases (120-504 hours), adverse event by CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE. In total, 168 patients were enrolled at 43 sites in Japan (Nov 2021-Sep 2023) with 162 patients (olanzapine, n = 80; placebo, n = 82) included in the per protocol set. The primary endpoint was met as the delayed phase CR rate was significantly greater with olanzapine than placebo (70.0% versus 56.1%, P = 0.047). Efficacy was maintained in the persistent phase (63.9% versus 44.4%). No nausea rate was also greater with olanzapine (delayed phase: 57.5% versus 37.8%; persistent phase: 51.4% versus 31.9%). CR rates in the delayed phase favored olanzapine across subgroups. Appetite loss was also decreased with olanzapine. Hyperglycemia and somnolence were mostly of low-grade severity. Olanzapine 5mg for 6 days with 5-HT3RA and dexamethasone appears effective for T-DXd-treated patients to prevent delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting.

Patterns of Rescue and Maintenance Medication Claims Surrounding an Asthma Exacerbation in Patients Treated as Intermittent or Mild Persistent Asthma.

To examine patterns of short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) and maintenance therapy claims surrounding the subset of severe asthma exacerbations associated with outpatient, urgent care, or emergency department visits or hospitalization (termed serious exacerbations) in patients treated as intermittent or mild persistent asthma. This was a retrospective study of 2010-2017 administrative claims from MerativeTM MarketScan® US databases for patients ≥12 years filling a SABA prescription for asthma (index). Patients had ≥12 months continuous insurance eligibility pre- and post-index and ≥1 additional SABA and/or maintenance medication fill appropriate for mild persistent asthma post-index. Prescription fills were assessed over 30 days before and after a serious exacerbation event. Of 323,443 patients (mean [standard deviation] age: 34.9 [18.2] years; 62.0% female) treated as intermittent or mild persistent asthma, 51,690 (16.0%) experienced ≥1 serious exacerbation post-index. During the 30 days pre-event, a greater proportion of patients filled a SABA versus maintenance therapy (24.6% vs 19.0%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-1.43; p < 0.001); during the 30 days post-event, patients were more likely to fill maintenance medication versus SABA (88.6% vs 67.0%; OR [95% CI]: 3.88 [3.75-4.01]; p < 0.001). The closer in time prior to the event, the greater the likelihood of filling a SABA versus maintenance prescription (OR [95% CI]; 1-7 days pre-event: 1.42 [1.36-1.48]; 8-14 days pre-event: 1.34 [1.27-1.41]; 15-30 days pre-event: 1.18 [1.12-1.24]; all p < 0.001). Over 4.5 times more patients filled a maintenance therapy within 7 days post-event (45,014) versus all 30 days pre-event (9835) (OR [95% CI]: 28.7 [27.7-29.7]; p < 0.001). These patterns of SABA rescue and maintenance fills suggest that a "window of opportunity" may exist to interrupt a serious exacerbation occurrence for patients treated as intermittent or mild persistent asthma if symptoms and inflammation are addressed concomitantly.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of CPL-01, an investigational long-acting ropivacaine, in bunionectomy: Results of a phase 2b study

CPL-01 (ropivacaine extended-release injection) is formulated to safely provide postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid use. Participants undergoing unilateral distal first metatarsal bunionectomy with osteotomy were randomized to receive either CPL-01 (200 mg in Cohort 1, 300 mg in Cohort 2), ropivacaine HCl (50 mg in Cohort 1, 75 mg in Cohort 2), or volume-matched placebo into the surgical site prior to closure. Participants remained in an inpatient setting for 72 h to assess efficacy (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] scores for pain with activity adjusted for opioid usage, and rescue medication usage), safety and pharmacokinetics. Seventy-three participants were randomized and treated, and 71 participants completed the study. Participants who received 300 mg CPL-01 had a mean (SD) area under the curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC0–72) of the NRS score with activity of 356.9 (132.82), which was lower than placebo, indicating less pain. Participants who received CPL-01 300 mg also had numerically lower mean total opioid consumption. CPL-01 was safe and well-tolerated, with no evidence of increased AEs in one group versus another. Infiltration of CPL-01 had no impact on wound or bone healing. CPL-01 showed predictable and consistent extended-release pharmacokinetics, with no indication of “dose-dumping.” Ropivacaine HCl delivered 94.3–99.7 % of its ropivacaine dose in the first 24 h; the 300 mg CPL-01 dose delivered 38.5 %. While this Phase 2b study was small, results demonstrated the safety, efficacy, and extended-release characteristics of this long-acting ropivacaine formulation in this surgical model, supporting further development of CPL-01 in Phase 3 clinical studies. Level of Clinical Evidence1

Pharmacological management of prolonged seizures in Dravet syndrome including intravenous phenytoin.

Dravet syndrome (DS) is an infantile onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Sodium channel blockers are known to exacerbate seizures in this syndrome. Due to its high incidence, the management of prolonged seizures is crucial for DS patients. There is still ambiguity regarding the use of intravenous phenytoin for prolonged seizure in DS patients mainly due to the lack of data, raising concern about the safety of it use. We conducted a retrospective study (from January 2009 to January 2020) aiming to assess the management of prolonged seizures in DS with a focus on the use of intravenous phenytoin. Data were collected for patients admitted to our hospital for seizures lasting >5 min. Among 52 identified patients in our database, 23 experienced 59 prolonged seizures managed in our hospital. Only four seizures ceased without rescue medication. Notably, the use of intravenous phenytoin was not associated with discernible adverse effects and was effective in stopping status epilepticus in 71% of cases. This study suggests the safety and efficacy of intravenous phenytoin for prolonged seizure in DS. There is a need for broader investigations of emergency treatments for evidence-based recommendations for the emergency plan of each patient.

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Therapy for Migraine and Other Chronic Headaches in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Retrospective Study in the USA.

This retrospective study assesses the efficacy and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) therapy in adolescents and young adults (ages 12-21) with migraine and chronic daily headaches unresponsive to standard treatments. Migraines in this demographic significantly impair school performance, self-esteem, psychological well-being, and cognitive health. These young patients are also particularly sensitive to the side effects of conventional medications, which are often prescribed off-label and come with high insurance denial rates. Medication overuse, including analgesics, triptans, and NSAIDs, is prevalent due to treatment failures. Elevated plasma CGRP levels observed during migraines suggest that anti-CGRP therapies, successful in adult populations, may also benefit this younger age group. Over a three-year period, patients at a specialized pediatric headache center were evaluated for the impact of anti-CGRP treatments, including monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (ubrogepant, rimegepant, and atogepant), administered either alone or in combination with OnabotulinumtoxinA. Data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical records, and patient progress was consistently documented using a structured template for each clinic visit. Additional patient satisfaction data were collected via telephone follow-ups and patient message reviews. The study included 23 patients, primarily treated for chronic migraine (CM) (78.3%), with a smaller subset addressing episodic migraine (EM), new daily persistent headaches (NDPHs), and post-traumatic headaches (PTHs). Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, including age, treatment duration, history of preventive treatment failures, and comorbidities like psychiatric conditions and sleep disorders, were collected. Anti-CGRP therapies, particularly when combined with traditional treatments or OnabotulinumtoxinA, resulted in significant improvements: 91.3% of patients experienced reduced migraine duration and intensity, 82.6% reported improvements in other bothersome symptoms, and 73.9% saw an improved response to rescue medications. Additionally, 78.3% of patients reported a reduction in their use of rescue medications per week by more than 50%, and emergency room visits were reduced for 56.5% of patients. Significant reductions in headache days were observed in 82.6% of patients after one month and 87% after three months, with nearly 40% experiencing more than a 50% reduction in both periods. The greatest benefits were observed in patients treated for more than six months. Adverse effects were minimal, with 95.7% of patients reporting no side effects, and patient satisfaction was high, with 69.6% opting to continue treatment. Overall, this study highlights the substantial potential of anti-CGRP therapy in improving outcomes for adolescents and young adults with CM and EM, offering a promising approach for a demographic that faces considerable challenges with conventional treatment options. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and expand clinical applications in this age group.

Pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms in early and mid-stage Parkinson's disease: guideline "Parkinson's disease" of the German Society of Neurology.

There are multiple pharmacological treatment options for motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). These comprise multiple drug classes which are approved for the condition, including levodopa, dopamine agonists, COMT inhibitors, MAO-B inhibitors, NMDA-receptor antagonists, anticholinergics, and others. Some of the drugs are approved for monotherapy and combination therapy while others are only approved as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Furthermore, treatment for special treatment situations, e.g., rescue medication for off-phases, for tremor, treatment during pregnancy and breast feeding is discussed and recommendations are given with further details. The recommendations were based on systematic literature reviews, drafted by expert teams, consented in online polls followed by online consensus meetings of the whole German Parkinson's Guideline Group, and publicly released in November 2023. In the new S2k (i.e., consensus-based) guidelines, the pharmacotherapy of the motor symptoms of PD is discussed in five chapters. These comprise "Parkinson medication", "Initial monotherapy", "Early combination therapy", "Fluctuations and dyskinesia", and "Parkinsonian tremor". Furthermore, there is a chapter for special treatment situations, including perioperative management, freezing of gait, and pregnancy and breastfeeding. The recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms of PD have been updated. Newly available drugs have been added, while other drugs (e.g., ergoline dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, budipine) have been removed from the recommendations.

Estimands in clinical trials of complex disease processes.

Clinical trials with random assignment of treatment provide evidence about causal effects of an experimental treatment compared to standard care. However, when disease processes involve multiple types of possibly semi-competing events, specification of target estimands and causal inferences can be challenging. Intercurrent events such as study withdrawal, the introduction of rescue medication, and death further complicate matters. There has been much discussion about these issues in recent years, but guidance remains ambiguous. Some recommended approaches are formulated in terms of hypothetical settings that have little bearing in the real world. We discuss issues in formulating estimands, beginning with intercurrent events in the context of a linear model and then move on to more complex disease history processes amenable to multistate modeling. We elucidate the meaning of estimands implicit in some recommended approaches for dealing with intercurrent events and highlight the disconnect between estimands formulated in terms of potential outcomes and the real world.

Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial.

The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-stage, phase II/III trial was to determine the efficacy of an oral cannabis extract in adults with refractory nausea and/or vomiting during moderately or highly emetogenic, intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Here, we report results of the prespecified combined analysis including the initial phase II and subsequent phase III components. Study treatment consisted of oral capsules containing either tetrahydrocannabinol 2.5 mg plus cannabidiol 2.5 mg capsules (THC:CBD) or matching placebo, taken three times a day from days -1 to 5, in addition to guideline-consistent antiemetics. The primary measure of effect was the difference in the proportions of participants with no vomiting or retching and no use of rescue medications (a complete response) during hours 0-120 after the first cycle of chemotherapy on study (cycle A). We recruited 147 evaluable of a planned 250 participants from 2016 to 2022. Background antiemetic prophylaxis included a corticosteroid and 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist in 97%, a neurokinin-1 antagonist in 80%, and olanzapine in 10%. THC:CBD compared with placebo improved the complete response rate from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI, 4 to 28, P = .01), with similar effects for absence of significant nausea, use of rescue medications, daily vomits, and the nausea scale on the Functional Living Index-Emesis quality-of-life questionnaire. More frequent bothersome adverse events of special interest included sedation (18% v 7%), dizziness (10% v 0%), and transient anxiety (4% v 1%). There were no serious adverse events attributed to THC:CBD. THC:CBD is an effective adjunct for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis, but was associated with additional adverse events. Drug availability, cultural attitudes, legal status, and preferences may affect implementation. Future analyses will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of THC:CBD.

Parental Report of Indoor Air Pollution Is Associated with Respiratory Morbidities in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

To determine the association between indoor air pollution and respiratory morbidities in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) recruited from the multicenter BPD Collaborative. A cross-sectional study was performed among participants <3years old in the BPD Collaborative Outpatient Registry. Indoor air pollution was defined as any reported exposure to tobacco or marijuana smoke, electronic cigarette emissions, gas stoves, and/or wood stoves. Clinical data included acute care use and chronic respiratory symptoms in the past 4weeks. A total of 1011 participants born at a mean gestational age of 26.4±2.2weeks were included. Most (66.6%) had severe BPD. More than 40% of participants were exposed to ≥1 source of indoor air pollution. The odds of reporting an emergency department visit (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.18-2.45), antibiotic use (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.12-3.21), or a systemic steroid course (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.24-3.84) were significantly higher in participants reporting exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) compared with those without SHS exposure. Participants reporting exposure to air pollution (not including SHS) also had a significantly greater odds (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.03) of antibiotic use as well. Indoor air pollution exposure (including SHS) was not associated with chronic respiratory symptoms or rescue medication use. Exposure to indoor air pollution, especially SHS, was associated with acute respiratory morbidities, including emergency department visits, antibiotics for respiratory illnesses, and systemic steroid use.

Efficacy and safety of minodronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with low back pain: a single-centre, randomized and open-label controlled trial

BackgroundLow back pain is one of the most common symptoms of osteoporosis. The pain can seriously affect patients’ mood and quality of life; it can also further aggravate bone loss, causing a serious social burden. Minodronate is an oral bisphosphonate that needs to be administered daily. It significantly reduces levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs) and rapidly improves symptoms of low back pain in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis requires long-term treatment, and daily dosing reduces patient compliance. Minodronate has a better safety profile than other bisphosphonates. The objective of the trial is to explore the efficacy and safety of minodronate in the treatment of low back pain in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.MethodsThis is a single-centre, randomized, open-label controlled trial with a 24-week duration. Seventy-two eligible patients will be randomly divided into 4 groups. Subjects will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive either minodronate (1 mg/day) or alendronate (10 mg/day) every day; senior women (≥ 75 years old) and older women (< 75 years old) will be at a ratio of 1:2. The primary outcome is the time required for the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to decline by ≥ 10 from baseline. The secondary outcome is the changes in VAS scores from baseline, the frequency and dosage of rescue medication, BTMs, bone mineral density (BMD), and variations in upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptom scores from baseline (including heartburn, pain, and bloating).DiscussionThis study will provide objective evidence for the efficiency and safety of minodronate. Furthermore, it will be helpful to evaluate the quantitative relationship between BTMs and BMD in patients with osteoporosis under different ages.Trial registrationThis study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05645289 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT05645289) on December 8, 2022. The registry name is Peking University Third Hospital. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (M2022465, 2022.08.09, V2.0). The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.Trial statusThe protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05645289). Recruitment has started in January 2023 and is still ongoing.

Neuraxial Analgesia for Scoliosis Correction: A Case Series in a Specialised Children's Centre.

Surgical correction of spinal deformities in children presents a challenge to the anaesthetist due to the extensive nature of the surgery, the co-morbidities of the patients and the constraints on aesthetic techniques of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord. Patients undergoing scoliosis surgery are considered to suffer severe pain, which may lead to a negative impact on patient psychology and physical well-being. By using effective postoperative pain regimens to enhance recovery after surgery, pain can be significantly reduced, leading to patient satisfaction, facilitating early mobilisation, promoting oral intake, lowering postoperative pain and shortening the length of hospital stay. Thus, the primary objectives of this study were to assess the postoperative pain management andfirst rescue analgesic medications, by using preservative-free morphine 50 mcg/kg and dexmedetomidine 4 mcg along with normal saline 0.5 ml kg caudally, as well as to look for thesecondary objectivesside effects, including respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritis, timing of postoperative ambulation and length of hospital stay. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively included children under 14 years of age and above three years who underwent scoliosis surgery under a caudal epidural-general anaesthesia using caudal morphine and the dexmedetomidine technique in the period from January to May 2023 at the National Guard Health Affairs Hospital (NGHA), Riyadh. We collected the data of seven cases using the electronic chart system of the Best Care database to extract the specific cases that meet the inclusion criteria for the study, which are idiopathic scoliosis patients, aged 3-14 years, and primary correction procedures. Results: The pain-free duration was between seven hours and 48 hours (about two days). There were four female cases (57.14%), and three cases were male (42.85%). The patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status were II to III. In all the cases, there was no documentation of any episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory distress or pruritus, except for one case where the patient had an episode of PONV. Conclusion: In this study, our aim was to present our experience with dexmedetomidine as an efficient medication when coadministered with morphine to be used in the operating room. We found a high level of reliability in prolonging analgesia time and delaying the usage of rescue medication. We encourage more studies on caudal dexmedetomidine for patients undergoing scoliosis surgery.