Extensive initiatives are under way to improve the quality of patient care and to create safer patient care environments. Some of these efforts focus on creating a culture of safety that overtly encourages and supports reporting of any patient care circumstance that threatens the safety of patients or caregivers. Others focus on specific processes of care where patients are known to be at high risk for developing complications. In general these complications are viewed as adverse events, and efforts are directed toward identifying how they might be prevented from occurring. Various types of events have been identified and research is ongoing to analyze their possible root causes and to design and test interventions that might prevent their occurrence in the future. Adverse events are defined as any patient injury caused by clinical care. An adverse event does not imply error or poor quality care, although in some situations this may be the case. The label of adverse event simply indicates that an undesirable clinical outcome has resulted from some aspect of diagnosis or therapy, which may be associated with an underlying disease process (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006). These adverse events are equivalent to iatrogenic events. An example to illustrate an adverse event due to different circumstances is anaphylactic reaction to penicillin. A serious allergic reaction to penicillin in a patient with no prior history of this allergy would be classified as an adverse drug event. Another example of an adverse event would be a patient with a known history of penicillin allergy who receives penicillin due to a prescribing error. Both examples are classified as adverse events, but only the prescribing error would be considered preventable. A number of adverse events are receiving intense scrutiny because they are deemed preventable. Some have been labeled as failure to rescue events, or the failure to prevent a clinically important deterioration in the patient such as death or permanent disability from a complication of an underlying illness (Silber, Williams, Krakauer, & Schwartz, 1992). An example of this type of complication is occurrence of a cardiac arrest or a major hemorrhage after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Failure to rescue provides a measure of the degree to which clinicians respond to adverse events that developed in patients under their care. These types of events may reflect the quality of monitoring of high-risk patients, the effectiveness of actions taken-or not taken-once early complications are recognized, or both. Rates of failure to rescue have been found to correlate with other measures of quality of care (Silber, Rosenbaum, Schwartz, Ross, & Williams, 1995). They have also served as outcome measures in studies examining the impact on quality care of nurse staffing ratios and educational levels (Aiken, Clarke, Sheung, Sloane, & Silber, 2003; Aiken, Clarke, Sloane, Sochalski, & Silber, 2002). Some adverse events have been labeled as nurse-sensitive outcomes, or outcomes that are influenced in some way by nursing practice. These include the development of complications such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolus (PE), and acquired pneumonia in ventilated-assisted patients (National Quality Forum, 2006). Including nursing practice as a key variable in adverse clinical outcomes generates an urgent need for research and knowledge development around nursing's contribution to and role in providing safe patient care. …
Read full abstract