Required Rescue Analgesia Research Articles

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy between Bupivacaine with Dexamethasone versus Bupivacaine in Caudal Block for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Abstract Background Caudal analgesia is one of the most popular regional blocks in paediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries but with the drawback of short duration of action after single shot local anaesthetic injection. We evaluated whether caudal dexamethasone as an adjuvant to the Bupivacaine improves analgesic efficacy after paediatric lower abdominal surgeries. Aim of the Study The current study is conducted to evaluate the analgesic effect of dexamethasone when given caudally as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries eg: open inguinal hernia repair, hypospidius, orchidopexy and circumcision surgeries. Methods Totally 60 patients of 1–3 years age group, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II undergoing elective lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated to two groups in double-blind manner. Group B (the control group) received 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine caudally for lower abdominal surgeries and 0.5 ml/kg for anal and penile surgeries and Group BD received 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries and 0.5 ml/kg for anal and penile surgeries, in which 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone was added for caudal analgesia. Post operative pain by FLACC scale (faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability tool score), rescue analgesic requirement and adverse effects were noted for 24 h. Results Results were statistically analysed using KRUSKAL-WALLIS TEST. Pain scores measured at 4,8 and 12h post-operative, were lower in Group BD as compared to Group B Mean duration of analgesia in Group BD 1026±139,8 min and in Group B was 465,6± 79,2 min with P = 0.001. Rescue analgesic requirement was more in Group B as compared to Group BD. Adverse effects after surgery were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion Caudal dexamethasone added to bupivacaine is a good alternative to prolong post-operative analgesia with less pain score compared to caudal bupivacaine alone.

Dexmedetomidine versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Fascia Iliaca Block in Knee Arthroscopy for Postoperative Pain

Abstract Background Knee arthroscopy is one of the most frequently performed interventions in orthopedic surgery that is commonly performed on a day-case basis. It allows the diagnosis and management of a wide range of knee problems without making a large incision, thus decreasing soft tissue trauma. However, postoperative pain is a common upsetting symptom following arthroscopic knee surgery that if inadequately treated, leads to prolonged duration of the functional rehabilitation of the knee, recovery time and the length of hospital stay thus a significant increase in the medical care costs. Aim of the Work To compare the adjuvant effect of adding dexmedetomidine and/or dexamethasone to bupivacaine while using facsia iliaca block for knee arthroscopy and their efficacy in achieving postoperative analgesia. Patients and Methods The type of study was a prospective double – blinded randomized controlled Trial conducted in Ain Shams University hospitals, Cairo, Egypt at 6 months. Patients aged 20 to 60 years scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia were included to receive FICB. Results In general, there was no significant difference between the three study groups regarding general patient characteristics as well as operative time. That ensured proper randomization conducted between our study groups. Additionally, that should nullify any bias that may have skewed the results in favor of one group rather than another one. There was statistically significant difference between groups according to heart rate from after 2hrs to after 24hrs this was also observed while measuring the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure but there was no significant difference between group B and C. Conclusion Our study shows that adding Dexmedetomidine and/or Dexamethasone (8mg) to Bupivacaine for FICB significantly prolonged the duration of block and decreased the requirement of rescue analgesics as compared to patients who received Bupivacaine alone. FICB is relatively easy and safe to perform. In our study we did not encounter any complication while doing the procedures and also by adding dexmedetomidine and/or dexamethasone (8mg).

Effect of Dexamethasone as a Local Anesthetic Adjuvant on Duration of Post Operative Analgesia for Ultrasound Guided Transabdominal Plane Block in Appendectomy – A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Abstract Background Poorly controlled acute pain after abdominal surgery is related to somatic pain signals derived from the abdominal wall and is associated with a variety of unwanted post- operative consequences, including patient suffering, distress, respiratory complications, delirium, myocardial ischemia, prolonged hospital stay, an increased likelihood of chronic pain, increased consumption of analgesics, delayed bowel function and increase the requirement for rescue analgesics. Appropriate pain treatment protocols to reduce postoperative morbidity, improve the results of the surgery and decrease hospital costs. Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding dexamethasone as a perineural adjuvant on the post operative duration of action of Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing appendectomy. Patients and Methods The study was conducted on 30 randomly chosen patients aged 17 to 55 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II scheduled for appendectomy under general anesthesia in Ain Shams University Hospitals after approval of the medical ethical committee. They were allocated in two groups of 15 patients each: Results Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to LA has been shown to prolong the duration of pain-free period, less requirement for rescue opioids consumption, more patient satisfaction. A similar finding was observed in our study. Conclusion The addition of dexamethasone to bupivacaine in TAP block in appendectomy provides a prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia, with reduced analgesic requirements, a better quality of analgesia in terms of VAS score compared to bupivacaine alone group.

Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Nalbuphine versus Intrathecal Fentanyl as Adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine for Cesarian Section under Spinal Anaesthesia

Abstract Background One of the main objectives of anesthesia is to alleviate the patient’s pain and agony, by ensuring the performance of surgical procedures without any discomfort. Elimination of postoperative pain is indispensable due to the central, peripheral and immunological stress response to tissue injury. So there is a need for extended analgesia without any side effects to achieve this goal. The use of opioids in intrathecal or epidural anesthesia has become common to increase postoperative analgesia. However, opioid-induced side effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention and pruritus, limit their use. Objective To assess the postoperative analgesic requirements and the spinally mediated analgesic effects of intrathecal nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine after cesarean section in comparison to intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl. Methods This randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals’ operating rooms on 48 patients undergoing cesarean section within a period of six months after approval of ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University. Results This study showed that the addition of a small dose of nalbuphine or fentanyl to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia prolonged the time of postoperative analgesia. In this study, there was no significant difference regarding the demographic data, duration of operation, maximum sensory level, and maximum motor blockade level. Adding to this, there was also no significant changes regarding the vital data of the patients. On the other hand, there was a significant difference regarding the duration of analgesia which was longer with nalbuphine. It was also noticed that with nalbuphine less patients required rescue analgesia in comparison to fentanyl. There was higher number of side effects recorded with fentanyl in comparison to nalbuphine. Conclusion Either intrathecal nalbuphine (0.8 mg) or intrathecal fentanyl (25 μg) combined with Bupivacaine improves intraoperative analgesia and prolongs post- operative analgesia in cesarean section. There was statistically significant difference between them, intrathecal nalbuphine had a prolonged duration of post-operative analgesia, lesser amount of rescue analgesia needed and fewer side effects than intrathecal fentanyl.

A Comparison of Subarachnoid Block Characteristics Following Co-administration of Fentanyl Premixed With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus Antecedent or Succedent to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background Adjuvants are often used during subarachnoid block to enhance and prolong the analgesia and decrease the adverse effects of high doses of local anesthetic agents. Intrathecal fentanyl premixed with hyperbaric bupivacaine has been used in spinal anesthesia and compared with the sequential use of these drugs in separate syringes. However, given the paucity of literature, we conducted this study where premixed antecedent and succedent administration of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine were compared in terms of flow dynamics, block characteristics, and hemodynamic alterations. Methodology This prospective, randomized, triple-blinded comparative study was conducted among 160 patients who were randomly allocated into four groups. Group A (n = 40) (control) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL of normal saline via a 5.0 mL syringe. Group B (n = 40) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl premixed via a single 5.0 mL syringe. Group C (n = 40) received 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl via a 1.0 mL syringe followed by 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine via a 5.0 mL syringe. Group D (n = 40) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine via a 5.0 mL syringe followed by 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl via a 1.0 mL syringe. The onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic parameters, time to first rescue analgesia, and adverse events were observed. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results The mean time taken for the onset of sensory and motor blockade was least in Group D followed by Group C. Duration of sensory and motor blockade was prolonged in Group D. Patients in Group A experienced more hypotension than Groups B, C, and D. Requirement of rescue analgesia was delayed in Groups C and D. Conclusions Administering 25 µg (0.5 mL) of Fentanyl separately after 15 mg (3.0 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine results in early onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, the delayed requirement of rescue analgesia postoperatively, and fewer side effects compared to its co-administration as a premixed solution or antecedent to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Evaluation of ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block in functional endoscopic sinus surgery for postoperative pain relief: A randomised controlled trial.

Postoperative pain can impede functional recovery and delay hospital discharge after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The study aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound (USG)-guided suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SZMNB) for postoperative pain in FESS. Forty-eight adult patients between 18 and 65 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II and scheduled to undergo FESS were enroled in this randomised controlled study. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive USG-guided SZMNB with general anaesthesia (n = 24) or general anaesthesia alone (n = 24). The numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score in the immediate postoperative period was recorded as the primary outcome. A total of 24 h postoperative rescue analgesic consumption, surgeon satisfaction score, postoperative haemodynamics, and postoperative complications were noted as secondary outcomes. The median (interquartile range) of the NRS pain score in the immediate postoperative period was 0 (0-0.25)[95% confidence interval (CI): 0, 0.08] in the block group compared to 2 (1.75-3) [95% CI: 1.60, 2.40] in the control group, P < 0.001]. Pain scores were significantly reduced at all time intervals till 24 h after surgery (P < 0.001). None of the patients required rescue analgesia in the block group. In contrast, eight patients required diclofenac 75 mg intravenous as rescue analgesia within 1 h of surgery and ten patients within 1-6 h of surgery in the control group. Other secondary outcomes were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). The USG-guided SZMNB provides excellent postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing FESS without significant side effects.

Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through Perichondral Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PurposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of the modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through the perichondral approach (M-TAPA) in abdominal surgeries. DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsWe searched electronic databases to identify relevant studies comparing M-TAPA with conventional analgesic techniques. The primary outcome was the requirement for rescue analgesia at 12 and 24 hours postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included the 11-point numerical rating scale pain scores at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours following surgery, global quality of recovery scores, and postoperative adverse events. FindingsFive randomized controlled trials involving 308 patients were analyzed. M-TAPA showed no significant difference in the requirement for rescue analgesia at 12 hours (relative risk [RR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 1.22; P = .424; I2 = 40.7%; Ph = .185) and 24 hours (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.99; P = .252; I2 = 90.3%; Ph < .001) postsurgery compared to non-M-TAPA. No significant differences in numerical rating scale pain scores or global quality of recovery scores were found between the two groups (all P < .05). However, M-TAPA was associated with a lower occurrence of nausea (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.68; P < .001; I2 = 0%; Ph = .834), vomiting (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.62; P < .001; I2 = 0%; Ph = .884), and itching (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.70; P = .002; I2 = 0%; Ph = .826). ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in analgesic efficacy and safety between M-TAPA and non-M-TAPA techniques.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia and stress response in inguinal herniorrhaphy

Background Hernia of the inguinal region is a common ailment that frequently necessitates surgical intervention. Inguinal hernia repair is linked to substantial pain after the surgery and a potential for the occurrence of persistent pain in the long run. The increased utilization of ultrasonography in anesthesiology departments has led to the development of novel regional block technology in clinical settings. Aim Compare between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and oblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair regarding the quality of anesthesia as the primary outcome. Patients and methods Fifty-six patients were recruited and were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided ESPB or OSTAPB after induction of general anesthesia. The main outcome was the quality of anesthesia and the stress response (cortisol level) between the two techniques. The secondary outcomes were the duration of sensory block, changes in intraoperative hemodynamics, total amount of rescue analgesia, and incidence of complications. Results In the current study, at 8 and 12 h postoperative, the visual analog scale score was statistically significantly higher in the OSTAPB group. The percentage of cases that required rescue analgesia and the total dose of rescue analgesia were significantly higher in the OSTAPB group. After the surgery, the cortisol level was significantly higher in the OSTAPB group. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided ESPB improved analgesic control by decreasing postoperative pain score and reducing postoperative rescue analgesia intake. Also, the same technique was associated with lower stress response.

Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

Lumbar spine surgery is associated with a significant degree of moderate-to-severe perioperative pain which can be alleviated by using different pain-relieving modalities; of these, erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine have promise. To compare the analgesic efficacy between intrathecal morphine (ITM) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. A total of 74 patients aged between 20 and 65 years of either sex were posted for elective lumbar spine surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients received 0.3 mg intrathecal morphine andGroup B received bilateral erector spinae plane block at L3 level by using 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine before starting the surgery for perioperative analgesia. In the perioperative period, pain was assessed by hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), numeric rating scale (NRS), and patient satisfaction score. Result: The difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure was found to be statistically significant between groups at three, six, 12, and 24 hours (p<0.05). The patients who required rescue analgesia in Group A and Group B were 23 (62.2%) and 37 (100%) patients in the first 24 hours. The rate of complication was higher in Group A than in Group B (45% vs 5.4%). The patient satisfaction score was found to be better in Group A than in Group B. Intrathecal morphineprovides more substantial and extended analgesia up to 48 hours postoperatively as compared to erector spinae plane block.

Efficacy of quadratus lumborum block as a relatively new analgesic technique in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia surgical repair

Study objective To determine the analgesic efficacy of ultrasonographic guided transmuscular graduatus lumborum block (QLB) in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia surgery. Design Prospective randomized double-blinded study. Methodology and interventions This prospective randomized double-blinded study was carried out at Sohag University hospital, after local research ethical committee approval and obtaining informed written consent from all patients participating in the study or their guardians. A total of 50 patients (ASA grade I to II) were posted for open inguinal hernia surgery. All patients underwent the operation under general anesthesia. Then patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A (QLB group, N=25): were underwent a transmuscular QLB approach, after wound dressing with a single shot of a total volume of 20 ml of mixture (10 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and10 ml normal saline). Group B (control group N=2): patients received only general anesthesia with conventional intravenous analgesia. Measurements Pain intensity between groups was compared using the Visual Analog Score (VAS), furthermore, analgesic consumption (morphine and ketorolac) and additional rescue analgesic requirements were also calculated. Results Postoperative VAS scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in group (QLB) A than the control group B at 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 h, the time of first rescue analgesia was significantly delayed in QLB group (15.8±3.94 h) than the control group (8.5±4.29 h). Number of patients required morphine was significantly different between both groups. Number of patients required ketorolac was significantly lower in QLB group than in the control group. Total morphine and ketorolac requirements were significantly lower in group A (2.5±0.71 mg, 75±25.1), respectively than those consumed by the control group B (4.7±0.49, 126±23.24), respectively. Conclusions QLB significantly improves the analgesic quality in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair compared to the standard intravenous analgesia regimen.

Comparison of intrathecal morphine versus erector spinae block for postoperative analgesia in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing kidney transplantation: A randomised clinical study.

Intrathecal morphine (ITM) or erector spinae plane (ESP) block reduces postsurgical pain in patients who underwent kidney transplantation surgeries. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of both modalities in terms of duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with postoperative fentanyl consumption. We conducted a randomised study and analysed 60 patients posted for elective live-related kidney transplantation surgery. They were randomised into two groups. Group M patients received ITM, whereas Group E patients received ESP block. We standardised the postoperative analgesia for both groups with intravenous fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was to compare the quality of analgesia using the numerical rating scale score between the groups. The secondary outcome was to observe the effect of both modalities on the duration of analgesia, postoperative fentanyl consumption, rescue analgesics requirement, catheter-related bladder discomfort and any complications. We found significantly lower pain scores at rest and while coughing in Group M at all time intervals, except at 24 h while coughing. The mean time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group M than in Group E (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative consumption of total fentanyl (P = 0.065) and rescue analgesia in both groups. In Group M, there was significantly more nausea, vomiting and pruritus (P = 0.001). ITM provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia at the cost of higher side effects than ESP block.

The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided cervical erector spinae block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundErector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block technique that can provide effective perioperative analgesia for thoracic, abdominal and lumbar surgeries. However, the effect of cervical ESPB on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.MethodsSeventy patients undergoing arthroscopy shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ESPB group (n = 35) or control group (n = 35). Patients in the ESPB group received an ultrasound-guided ESPB at the C7 level with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine 30 min before induction of general anesthesia, whereas patients in the control group received no block. The primary outcome measures were the static visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) before anesthesia (t1), 5 min after anesthesia (t2), 10 min after skin incision (t3), and 10 min after extubation (t4); intraoperative remifentanil consumption; the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) score, quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale score and the number of patients who required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery; and adverse events.ResultsThe static VAS scores at 4, 12 and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ESPB group than those in the control group (2.17 ± 0.71 vs. 3.14 ± 1.19, 1.77 ± 0.77 vs. 2.63 ± 0.84, 0.74 ± 0.66 vs. 1.14 ± 0.88, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR or MAP at any time point during the perioperative period between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was significantly less in the ESPB group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of BCS and QoR-15 scale were higher in the ESPB group 24 h after surgery than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the ESPB group required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in either group.ConclusionsUltrasound-guided cervical ESPB can provide effective postoperative analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, resulting in a better postoperative recovery with fewer complications.Trial registrationChictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2300070731 (Date of registry: 21/04/2023, prospectively registered).

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine patch to conventional analgesics after operative fixation of extra capsular fracture of proximal femur

IntroductionProximal femur fractures are common among older individuals and pose challenges in achieving effective post-operative analgesia. Age-related co-morbidities limit the selection of analgesics in this population. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch with traditional analgesics after fixation of an extracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. MethodologyA prospective randomized controlled study was conducted over a 2-year period, involving 60 patients who underwent surgery for extra capsular intertrochanteric fracture fixation. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups by random envelope method. Group A received an intravenous formulation of paracetamol and tramadol for the initial 48 h, followed by an oral formulation. Group B received a transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch delivering 5 mcg/hour immediately after surgery, which continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. During the 14-day monitoring period, patients' pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement. The primary objective was to maintain a VAS score of 4 or lower. Rescue analgesics were administered if the VAS score reached 6. The secondary objectives included evaluating the quantity of rescue analgesics required and monitoring for any adverse effects or complications. ResultsPain scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in Group B at all-time points (p-value 0.0006 - ≤ 0.0001), and the requirement for rescue analgesia was also significantly lower in this group. The administration of the TDB patch did not result in any significant adverse effects. ConclusionTDB patch is secure and offers better compliance and analgesia than other analgesics in the postoperative period whilst treating proximal femur extra capsular fracture.

The Effect of Different Propofol-Ketamine Combinations on Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Adenoidectomy and Tonsillectomy Surgery

PurposeEmergence delirium (ED) after sevoflurane anesthesia remains a serious issue in children. We aimed to compare different ratios of propofol-ketamine combinations to determine a better option for preventing ED. DesignA prospective, randomized clinical trial. MethodsIn this study, 112 children aged between 3 and 12 years who underwent adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy were recruited. Propofol 1 mg kg−1 + ketamine 1 mg kg−1 (1:1 ratio), propofol 1.5 mg kg−1 + ketamine 0.75 mg kg−1 (2:1 ratio), propofol 2 mg kg−1 + ketamine 0.66 mg kg−1 (3:1 ratio), and propofol 3 mg kg−1 were applied at induction of anesthesia for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Fentanyl 1 mcg kg−1 and rocuronium 0.6 mg kg−1 were applied at induction, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and O2/N2O mixture for all participants. Intravenous morphine 0.1 mg kg−1 was applied for postoperative analgesia in the last 10 minutes of surgery. ED was defined as a Watcha score of ≥3. Demographics, hemodynamics, extubation time, Watcha scores, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scores, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), rescue analgesic requirement, and postoperative complications were recorded. FindingsED was significantly higher at 10 and 20 minutes in Group IV. Eighteen children experienced ED in PACU, (3, 2, 2, and 11 children in Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively). Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scores were significantly different at all times. Rescue analgesics were required by 3 children (10.7%) in Group I, 2 (7.1%) in Group II, 2 (7.1%) in Group III, and 10 (35.7%) in Group IV (P = .012). The PACU stay was 21.9 ± 6.4 in Group I, 18.7 ± 6.3 in Group II, 16.7 ± 5.8 in Group III, and 17.4 ± 5.8 in Group IV. Nystagmus was observed in three children in Group I. ConclusionsTo addition of ketamine to propofol during the induction of sevoflurane anesthesia can reduce the ED and analgesic requirements in children. A propofol-to-ketamine ratio of 3:1 provided better postoperative recovery with less pain and ED, without prolonging the PACU length of stay.

A Comparison of Analgesic and Recovery Profiles of Ketamine, Lignocaine, and Dexmedetomidine (KeLiDex) Versus Fentanyl-Based Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Nephrectomies: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Pilot Study.

In the search for opioid-free anesthesia, notable numbers of drugs, singly or in combinations, have been tested with variable results. However, most of the drugs used are not as strong as opioids. Even if some non-opioid drugs are potent enough, they cause significant untoward effects, necessitating the use of lower effective dosages of multiple drugs as a substitute. The present pilot study evaluated low-dose combinations of ketamine, lignocaine, and dexmedetomidine (KeLiDex) against fentanyl-based anesthesia for analgesia and recovery profiles in laparoscopic nephrectomies. Twenty patients (10 in each group) randomly received KeLiDex or fentanyl infusion as an analgesic component for balanced general anesthesia. Entire patients also received paracetamol and quadratus lumborum block-2. Anesthesia depth, neuromuscular blockade, and reversal were standardized. Intraoperative hemodynamic variation, time to extubation after reversal (T-tEAR) administration, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge readiness assessed using modified Aldrete score, sedations using Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, postoperative pain, and rescue analgesia consumptions were compared using different validated scales. P-value <0.05 was considered significant. The KeLiDex group had a significantly lower heart rate (HR) between 45-90 minutes and at the time of reversal. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) differed significantly at only a 60-minute interval (KeLiDex group 80.90 ± 9.50 versus fentanyl group 92.60 ± 16.13 mmHg, p-value 0.041). The Friedman test for change in HR and MAP over time within each group was also insignificant. The mean ± SD of T-tEAR was 6.37 ± 2.13 in KeLiDex, and 8.18 ± 2.92 minutes in the fentanyl group, p-value 0.27. Sedation scores, Modified Alderette scores, pain scores, and rescue analgesic requirements were also comparable. KeLiDex could effectively control hemodynamics and pain both at rest and in movements in line with fentanyl-based anesthesia for laparoscopic nephrectomies. Further, recovery from the anesthesia, sedation, and PACU discharge readiness were similar.

Is a Failed Spinal Attempt Associated With a Worse Clinical Course Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundSpinal anesthesia (SA) is the preferred anesthesia modality for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, studies establishing SA as preferential may be subject to selection bias given that general anesthesia (GA) is often selectively utilized on more difficult, higher-risk operations. The optimal comparison group, therefore, is the patient converted to GA due to a failed attempt at SA. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors and outcomes following failed SA with conversion to GA during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsA consecutive cohort of 4,483 patients who underwent primary TJA at our institution was identified (2,004 THA and 2,479 TKA). Of these patients, 3,307 underwent GA (73.8%), 1,056 underwent SA (23.3%), and 130 patients failed SA with conversion to GA (2.90%). Primary outcomes included rescue analgesia requirement in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time to ambulation, pain scores in the PACU, estimated blood loss, and 90-day complications. ResultsRisk factors for SA failure included older age and a higher comorbidity burden. Failure of SA was associated with increased estimated blood loss, rescue intravenous opioid use, and time to ambulation when compared to the successful SA group in both THA and TKA patients (P < .001). The anesthesia modality was not associated with significant differences in PACU pain scores. The 90-day complication rate was similar between the failed SA and GA groups. There was a higher incidence of postoperative pain prompting unplanned visits and thromboembolism when comparing failed SA to successful SA in both THA and TKA patients (P < .05). ConclusionsIn our series, patients who had failed SA demonstrated inferior outcomes to patients receiving successful SA and similar outcomes to patients receiving GA who did not have an SA attempt. This emphasizes the importance of success in the initial attempt at SA for optimizing outcomes following TJA.

Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Nerve Block for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Our understanding of dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery, is characterized by a current lack of compelling evidence, and it remains unknown whether the potential benefits of use outweigh the risks. The aim of the study was to evaluate the benefit and safety profiles of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Springer, medRxiv, and Scopus up to 17 May 2024. Risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes were quantified. Results: Twenty studies were identified. In breast cancer surgery, the use of dexmedetomidine reduced 24 h total morphine consumption (SMD = -1.99 [95% CI -3.01 to -0.98], p = 0.0001, I2 = 91%, random effects) and prolonged the requirement for morphine rescue analgesia (SMD = 2.98 [95% CI 0.01 to 5.95], p = 0.05, I2 = 98%, random effects). In abdominal cancer surgery, the dexmedetomidine group had lower total sufentanil consumption (SMD = -1.34 [95% CI -2.29 to -0.40], p = 0.005, I2 = 84%, random effects). Dexmedetomidine reduced the VAS score and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). No studies using dexmedetomidine reported serious adverse events. Conclusions: Using dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery could lower the VAS pain score and prolong the regional anesthesia duration, which would lead to a decrease in total opioid consumption and possibly contribute to fewer PONV events. Furthermore, the reports of no serious adverse events indicate its good safety profile.

Attenuation of acute postoperative pain and opioid requirement with the use of magnesium sulfate in patients undergoing limb amputations.

To compare the effects of magnesium sulphate on the total dose of intravenous morphine consumption postoperatively following limb amputations along with rescue analgesia requirement, pain scores and side effects. This prospective, triple-blinded, randomised controlled study was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised of patients scheduled for limb amputations. They were randomised into 2 equal groups. The anaesthesia protocol was uniform for all patients. Intervention group A was administered 30mg/kg loading dose and 10mg/kg/hr maintenance dose of magnesium sulphate intravenously, while patients in control group B received the same amount of plain isotonic saline. Morphine consumption, including that used for rescue analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia, was measured for 24 hours postoperatively. Numeric rating scale was used for the evaluation of postoperative pain in both groups at 15min, 1h, 2h, at discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit and at 12h and 24h in the ward. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 24 patients enrolled, the study was completed by 20(83.33%). There were 10(50%) patients in group A; 8(40%) males and 2(20%) females with mean age 24.8±14.14 years and mean surgery time 130.5±47.86 minutes. There were 10(50%) patients in group B; 8(40%) males and 2(20%) females with mean age 23.2±7.4 years and mean surgery time 117±23.85 minutes (p>0.05). Total morphine used over 24 hours in group A was 16±3.1 mg compared to 29.6±11.2 mg in group B (p<0.05). The time for first use of patient-controlled analgesia after arriving in the postanaesthesia care unit was significantly delayed in group A (72.2±24.95 minutes) compared to that in group B (25±26.68 minutes) (p<0.05). Pain scores were significantly higher in the group B at 15min compared to group A (p<0.05), but not at the rest of the time points (p>0.05). Intravenous magnesium sulphate proved to be effective in lowering postoperative opioid requirement following limb amputations.

Ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block versus interlaminar epidural block for analgesia in pediatric abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAlthough the efficacy and safety of epidural block (EB) are fairly high, complications such as inadvertent dural puncture may limit its use. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a relatively new regional technique that provides perioperative somatic and visceral analgesia for pediatric patients. This trial compared the quality of pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who received either QLB or EB.MethodsPatients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group E(n = 29): received EB; Group QL(n = 29): received QLB. Both groups were injected with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5 ml/kg). Assessment of total analgesia consumption was the primary outcome measure, whereas the secondary outcome measures were assessment of postoperative analgesic effect by Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and time of first analgesic request.ResultsOur study showed that the mean total fentanyl consumption was comparable between both groups(38.67 ± 5.02 and 36.47 ± 5.13 µg in the E and QL groups, respectively, P = 0.246). Only five patients did not require rescue analgesia (3 in the E group,2 in the QL group, P = 0.378). The mean duration of analgesia showed no significant difference between the two groups (9.9 ± 1.58 and 11.02 ± 1.74 h in the E and QL groups, respectively, P = 0.212). Evaluation of CHEOPS score values immediately in PACU and for the initial 24 h following operation showed no significant difference between the two study groups(P > 0.05).ConclusionQLB can achieve analgesic effects comparable to those of EB as a crucial part of multimodal analgesia in children undergoing abdominal surgeries.Clinical trial registration numberPACTR202203906027106.

Perioperative epidural catheter analgesia as a component of a multimodal analgesic approach in a dog with thoracic hemivertebrae and kyphosis undergoing thoracic vertebral stabilisation

AbstractA 4‐year‐old, male, neutered French bulldog weighing 13.5 kg presented with urinary and faecal incontinence, progressive, non‐painful paraparesis and pelvic limb proprioceptive ataxia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a T12 constrictive myelopathy in association with multiple thoracic vertebral malformations, and mildly impinging thoracic intervertebral disc protrusions. Additionally, there was a sacral axial defect and degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. Surgical treatment comprised bilateral dorsal vertebral stabilisation of T9–T13. This case report summarises the peri‐anaesthetic management, which included an ‘in‐plane’ ultrasound‐guided placement of an epidural catheter at the level of L3–L4 and advancement cranially to T12 as a component of a multimodal analgesic regimen. Following the cessation of postoperative epidural bupivacaine administration, the patient remained comfortable without requiring rescue analgesia, and was discharged within 24 hours of surgery. At the latest recheck 5 months after surgery, the dog's neurological status remained static. This technique and application remain unexplored in existing veterinary literature.