Reproduction Of Beef Heifers Research Articles

22 Puberty induction protocol, but not supplement amount, overcomes the negative impacts of reduced frequency of supplementation on reproduction of beef heifers

Abstract This study evaluated the performance of Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers submitted to a puberty induction protocol and offered two supplementation amounts and delivery frequencies. Sixty-four Brangus crossbred heifers were stratified by BW and age (244 ± 4 kg; 311 ± 18 d) and assigned into 1 of 16 bahiagrass pastures on d 0. Treatments were randomly assigned to pastures in a 2 × 2 factorial design (4 pastures/treatment) and consisted of soyhulls-based supplementation at 1.25% or 1.75% of BW (DM basis) offered daily or 3 times weekly for 168 d. The puberty induction protocol consisted of CIDR insert on d 56 and removal on d 70, 5-mL PGF2a injection on d 86, 2-mL GnRH injection and timed-AI on d 89. Heifers were exposed to Angus bulls from d 89 to 167 (1 bull/pasture). Pregnancy diagnosis was assessed on d 212. Frequency × rate effects were not detected (P ≥ 0.19) for any variable. Reducing the supplementation frequency from daily to 3X weekly tended (P = 0.07) to decrease overall ADG and puberty attainment on d 56 (53 vs. 41 ± 6%), but not puberty attainment on d 89 (P = 0.45; 84 vs. 78 ± 6%) and pregnancy percentage on d 212 (P = 0.97; 69 vs. 69 ± 7%). Increasing the supplement amount from 1.25% to 1.75% of BW increased (P = 0.04) overall ADG, tended (P = 0.09) to hasten puberty attainment on d 56 (40 vs. 54 ± 6%) and d 89 (74 vs. 88 ± 6%), and enhanced (P = 0.03) pregnancy percentage on d 212 (53 vs. 80 ± 7%). Therefore, the inclusion of a puberty induction protocol, but not increasing the supplement amount, enabled a reduced frequency of supplementation (3 vs. 7 times weekly) without detrimental impacts on percentage of pregnant yearling beef heifers.

103 Puberty induction protocol, but not supplement amount, overcomes the negative impacts of reduced frequency of supplementation on reproduction of beef heifers

Abstract This study evaluated the performance of Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers submitted to a puberty induction protocol and offered two supplementation amounts and delivery frequencies. Sixty-four Brangus crossbred heifers were stratified by BW and age (244 ± 4 kg; 311 ± 18 d) and assigned into 1 of 16 bahiagrass pastures on d 0. Treatments were randomly assigned to pastures in a 2 × 2 factorial design (4 pastures/treatment) and consisted of soyhulls-based supplementation at 1.25% or 1.75% of BW (DM basis) offered daily or 3 times weekly for 168 d. The puberty induction protocol consisted of CIDR insert on d 56 and removal on d 70, 5-mL PGF2a injection on d 86, 2-mL GnRH injection and timed-AI on d 89. Heifers were exposed to Angus bulls from d 89 to 167 (1 bull/pasture). Pregnancy diagnosis was assessed on d 212. Frequency × rate effects were not detected (P ≥ 0.19) for any variable. Reducing the supplementation frequency from daily to 3X weekly tended (P = 0.07) to decrease overall ADG and puberty attainment on d 56 (53 vs. 41 ± 6%), but not puberty attainment on d 89 (P = 0.45; 84 vs. 78 ± 6%) and pregnancy percentage on d 212 (P = 0.97; 69 vs. 69 ± 7%). Increasing the supplement amount from 1.25% to 1.75% of BW increased (P = 0.04) overall ADG, tended (P = 0.09) to hasten puberty attainment on d 56 (40 vs. 54 ± 6%) and d 89 (74 vs. 88 ± 6%), and enhanced (P = 0.03) pregnancy percentage on d 212 (53 vs. 80 ± 7%). Therefore, the inclusion of a puberty induction protocol, but not increasing the supplement amount, enabled a reduced frequency of supplementation (3 vs. 7 times weekly) without detrimental impacts on percentage of pregnant yearling beef heifers.

Beef heifer development within three calving systems1,2

A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate the effects of calving system, weaning age, and postweaning management on growth and reproduction in beef heifers. Heifer calves (n = 676) born in late winter (average birth date = February 7 +/- 9 d) or early spring (average birth date April 3 +/- 10 d) were weaned at 190 or 240 d of age, and heifers born in late spring (average birth date May 29 +/- 10 d) were weaned at 140 or 190 d of age. Heifers were managed to be first exposed to breeding at approximately 14 mo of age. After weaning, the calves were randomly assigned to treatments. Heifers on the constant gain treatment were fed a corn silage- and hay-based diet. Heifers on delayed gain treatments were placed on pasture but were fed grass hay or a supplement, or both, depending on the forage conditions. Three months before their respective breeding seasons, delayed gain heifers were moved to drylot and fed a corn silage- and barley-based diet (late winter or early spring) or moved to spring rangeland (late spring). The data were analyzed using mixed model procedures with calving system, weaning age, and postweaning management options creating 12 treatments. Average daily gain was 0.36 +/- 0.05 (SED) kg/d less (P < 0.001) for delayed gain heifers during the initial phase, whereas these heifers gained 0.44 +/- 0.03 kg/d more (P < 0.001) than constant gain heifers during the last 90 d before breeding. Body weights at the beginning of the breeding season did not differ (P = 0.97) between constant gain and delayed gain heifers but were affected by calving system and weaning age, reflecting some of the differences in initial BW. Prebreeding BW for heifers weaned at 190 d of age were 36 +/- 6.4 kg heavier (P < 0.001) for those born in late winter and early spring compared with late spring and were 388, 372, and 330 kg for heifers weaned in October at 240, 190, or 140 d of age (linear effect, P < 0.001). The proportion of heifers exhibiting luteal activity at the beginning of the breeding season was not affected (P = 0.57) by treatment. Approximately half of the heifers were randomly selected for breeding. Treatment had no effect (P = 0.64) on pregnancy rates. In conclusion, heifers from varied calving systems and weaning strategies can be raised to breeding using either constant or delayed gain strategies without affecting the percentage of heifers cycling at the beginning of the breeding season. These results suggest that producers have multiple options for management of heifer calves within differing calving systems.

Postweaning growth and reproduction of beef heifers exposed to calve at 24 or 30 months of age in spring and fall seasons.

Angus and Angus x Hereford heifer calves born in spring or fall seasons were allotted by weight at weaning to be exposed to bulls for calving at either 24 or 30 mo of age. Comparisons were made 1) within birth season--heifers born in the same season were first exposed to bulls at either 14 to 16 or 19 to 22 mo of age and 2) within breeding season--heifers born in different but consecutive seasons (spring-fall or fall-spring) were exposed to bulls during the same season but at different ages. Spring-born heifers exposed for 30-mo calving were heavier (336 vs 302 kg) and taller (P less than .01) at breeding than those exposed for 24-mo calving. Also, more were observed in estrus and became pregnant (P less than .01) during a 21-d AI breeding period, but season-long (63 d) pregnancy rates were not different (86%). Fall-born heifers exposed for 24- or 30-mo calving were similar for weight, hip height, and body condition score (BCS) at breeding, but season-long pregnancy rates were 71 and 94%, respectively (P less than .01). Although fall-born heifers were heavier at weaning (P less than .01), spring-born heifers were heavier, taller, and had higher BCS at breeding (P less than .01), regardless of age. Within spring breeding seasons, breeding weight and initial reproduction were not affected by heifer age. Within fall breeding seasons, older heifers were larger (P less than .01) and had greater reproductive performance (P less than .05) than younger heifers. Age at breeding, irrespective of season, consistently affected (P less than .01) both hip height (116 vs 113 cm) and pelvic area (209 vs 178 cm2) for older vs younger heifers, respectively. These data indicate that heifers exposed for 30-mo first calving are heavier, taller, have larger pelvic area, and have greater reproductive performance than those exposed for 24-mo first calving.

The influence of zeranol implantation on growth and reproduction of beef heifers

Crossbred beef heifers received a 36-mg implant of zeranol at 60 d of age (R1; n = 35) or at both 60 and 197 d (weaning; R2; n = 32) or received no implants (C; n = 35). R2 heifers were heavier and had greater pelvic areas (P &lt; 0.05 for both) at breeding compared with controls. There was no effect of treatment on the calving rates (78.1 vs. 80.0 vs. 74.3%) or on mean pelvic area at the time of calving (261.1 vs. 260.4 vs. 257.6 cm2) for R2, R1 and C heifers, respectively. We conclude that zeranol can be successfully used for growth enhancement from 60 d of age without detriment to subsequent reproductive performance. Key words: Zeranol, heifers, pregnancy rate, pelvic area

Effects of oestradiol, zeranol or trenbolone acetate implants on puberty, reproduction and fertility in heifers

The effects of anabolic agents on reproduction in beef heifers were determined by using 300 mg trenbolone acetate (TBA), 36 mg zeranol and 19 mg oestradiol-17 beta in a biodegradable pellet (1E: American Cyanamid, USA), or two such pellets (2E). On Day 1 of experiment, 81 Hereford x Friesian heifers (mean age = 84 +/- 1.2 days) were allocated at random to the following treatments: (1) controls (N = 15); (2) TBA (N = 15); (3) 1E (N = 12); (4) 2E (N = 15); (5) zeranol (N = 13); (6) TBA + 2E (N = 11). The 1 (1E), or 2 (2E) oestradiol implants were administered on Day 1 of the experiment only. Heifers assigned to receive TBA and zeranol were implanted on Days 1, 84, 168 and 252. Blood progesterone concentrations and oestrous activity were monitored from Days 137 and 200 respectively. Mean age (days) and weight (kg) at puberty (first ovulation), for heifers that reached puberty in Groups 1-6 respectively were 352 and 308, 419 and 356, 373 and 325, 381 and 331, 400 and 353, 423 and 383 [residual standard deviation (r.s.d.) = 43.8 and 39.4 for age and weight respectively]. Heifers in Group 4 were older (P less than 0.05), but not heavier (P greater than 0.05), while those in Groups 2 and 5 were both older (P less than 0.005) and heavier (P less than 0.005) than the controls at puberty. Age and weight at puberty were not different in heifers assigned to Groups 3 and 4, or to Groups 2 and 6. The proportion of heifers showing oestrus before puberty (prepubertal oestrus) were 3/15, 12/15, 6/12, 7/15, 10/13 and 11/11 in Groups 1-6 respectively. Heifers in Groups 2 and 5 had higher incidences of prepubertal oestrus than controls, while those in other treatment groups were not different. There was no treatment effect on the incidence of silent ovulations, but the incidence of non-ovulatory oestrus, after puberty, was increased from 4/48 in Group 1 to 26/40 (P less than 0.001), 15/56 (P less than 0.05) and 34/57 (P less than 0.001) in Groups 2, 4 and 5, respectively. Heifers in Group 6 had a higher incidence of non-ovulatory oestrus (P less than 0.05), but not of prepubertal oestrus, than did those in Group 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The effect of molybdenum-induced copper deficiency on reproduction in beef heifers

The effect of molybdenum-induced copper deficiency on reproduction in beef heifers