Two distinct regimes, contractions and expansions, are generated in a model in which goods markets clear and all individuals are optimizing, strict wage and price takers, have fully rational expectations, and are heterogeneous in both preferences and resource endowments. Involuntary unemployment, asymmetric monetary policy effectiveness, and a changing relationship between real wages and employment over the business cycle are the result of optimizing behavior by monopsonistic, wage-setting, and price-taking firms faced with price uncertainty, an upward-sloped supply of employees, and efficiency wage behavior. Disequilibrium and involuntary unemployment can occur at the level of the individual firm's labor market. (JEL E32, E52, J41, J42) I. INTRODUCTION For many economists, three stylized facts are central to any plausible theory of the business cycle. (1) Friedman and Schwartz (1963) and Romer and Romer (1994) concluded that monetary shocks have output, employment, and unemployment effects at least some of the time and such effects are asymmetric with respect to the state of the economy. (2) Unemployment is subject to fluctuations associated with recessions and expansions and, in some recessions, has been very high. (1) (3) The relationship between real wages and employment appears to be time period sensitive as reported by Abraham and Haltiwanger (1995). Although first proposed by Keynes, modern economists such as Benassy (2002) argue that at least some unemployment is best characterized as involuntary and indicates a state of disequilibrium. In this article, we consider a plausible alternative to disequilibrium explanations of these elements of the business cycle based on goods market imperfections, such as those by Benassy (2002) and Dixon and Rankin (1995), who considered monopoly power by firms in the goods market, and Benassy (1995), who assumed monopoly power by unions in the labor market. We assume that the goods market is characterized by competitive market clearing, but firms have some monopsony power as reflected in an upward-sloped or bounded supply of labor to the firm and the ability to set the optimal wage before knowing the price they will receive for their output, which is assumed to be stochastic, and making their employment decision. These modifications are embedded in an otherwise conventional general equilibrium model in which all agents (firms and consumers/workers/capitalists) are fully optimizing and form totally rational expectations and labor may exhibit efficiency wage behavior. (2) This is not a representative agent model and cannot be reduced to such. Individuals are heterogeneous in both their endowments and preferences. Firms may be heterogeneous with respect to their production technology and the interests of firm owners are distinct from those of their employees. The latter is essential to generate the changing regimes that produce predictions that correspond to the stylized facts. Monetary shocks affect output, prices, employment, and unemployment in an asymmetrical manner consistent with the traditional business cycle. The key to understanding these effects is the labor market. If the expected quantity of money is generated, then the competitive, market-clearing real wage will result. Lower than expected quantities of money generate a deficiency of aggregate demand, lower than expected output prices and real wages above the competitive wage. Real wages above the competitive wage are associated with excess supply of labor and involuntary unemployment (independent of that associated with efficiency wage behavior). This contractionary regime will persist as long as the low quantities of money persist, even though all agents have fully rational expectations, are optimizing, and the goods market clears. In this regime, increases in the quantity of money increase prices, employment, and output, and employment varies negatively with the real wage. Efficiency wage behavior may decrease effort as the real wage rate is decreased. …
Read full abstract