Replication Protein A Binding Research Articles

NMR Study of Temperature-Dependent Single-Stranded DNA Binding Affinity of Human Replication Protein A

The replication protein A (RPA), is a heterotrimer with 70, 32 and 14 kDa subunits and plays a crucial role in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. The largest subunit, RPA70, binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and mediates interactions with many cellular and viral proteins. In this study, we performed nuclear magnetic resonance experiments on the complex of the DNA binding domain A of human RPA70 (RPA70A) with ssDNA, d(CCCCC), at various temperatures, to understand the temperature dependency of ssDNA binding affinity of RPA70A. Essential residues for ssDNA binding were conserved while less essential parts were changed with the temperature. Our results provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanism of the ssDNA binding of human RPA.

Dynamic binding of replication protein a is required for DNA repair.

Replication protein A (RPA), the major eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein, is essential for replication, repair and recombination. High-affinity ssDNA-binding by RPA depends on two DNA binding domains in the large subunit of RPA. Mutation of the evolutionarily conserved aromatic residues in these two domains results in a separation-of-function phenotype: aromatic residue mutants support DNA replication but are defective in DNA repair. We used biochemical and single-molecule analyses, and Brownian Dynamics simulations to determine the molecular basis of this phenotype. Our studies demonstrated that RPA binds to ssDNA in at least two modes characterized by different dissociation kinetics. We also showed that the aromatic residues contribute to the formation of the longer-lived state, are required for stable binding to short ssDNA regions and are needed for RPA melting of partially duplex DNA structures. We conclude that stable binding and/or the melting of secondary DNA structures by RPA is required for DNA repair, including RAD51 mediated DNA strand exchange, but is dispensable for DNA replication. It is likely that the binding modes are in equilibrium and reflect dynamics in the RPA–DNA complex. This suggests that dynamic binding of RPA to DNA is necessary for different cellular functions.

Understanding the Efficacy of Inhibitor TRDL‐551 on Replication Protein A (RPA) Binding Affinity

Replication protein A (RPA), a single stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein, prevents ssDNA from being a target of cellular nucleases, recombining with other complementary sequences, or folding‐back on itself to form hairpin structures. Each of these scenarios can cause high rates of genome instability. Due to the protective function of RPA it now used as a therapeutic target for cancer cells, wherein DNA replication and repair often occur at high frequencies. For the current study, we utilized a chemical inhibitor of RPA, TDRL‐551, which has been previously characterized as a potent inhibitor of RPA binding to substrate. In this study, we chose to further analyze the TDRL‐551 inhibitor by testing different binding conditions either by the unmodified or acetylated form of RPA. Results from our laboratory have shown that acetylated RPA binds with higher affinity to ssDNA compared to the unmodified form. We tested RPA (unmodified and acetylated) binding under two different conditions; (i) RPA was pre‐bound to substrate and then incubated with inhibitor or (ii) RPA was pre‐bound to inhibitor and then exposed to substrate. Our results showed that in the first case, there was no effect of exposure to inhibitor on both unmodified and acetylated RPA binding. However, when RPA was first incubated with the inhibitor, both the unmodified and acetylated RPA showed reduced binding affinity to the ssDNA substrate. In conclusion, our studies show that the length of the DNA substrate, the post‐translational status of RPA and the time of exposure of the inhibitor to the RPA all play a significant role in determining the potency of this inhibitor. Further studies are being done to ascertain the efficacy of this inhibitor before using it in translational research.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health GM098328 (to LB)

Replication protein A as a major eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding protein and its role in DNA repair

Replication protein A (RPA) is a key regulator of eukaryotic DNA metabolism. RPA is a highly conserved heterotrimeric protein and contains multiple oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding folds. The major RPA function is binding to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates forming in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Although binding ssDNA with high affinity, RPA can rapidly diffuse along ssDNA and destabilizes the DNA secondary structure. A highly dynamic RPA binding to ssDNA allows other proteins to access ssDNA and to displace RPA from the RPA-ssDNA complex. As has been shown recently, RPA in complex with ssDNA is posttranslationally modified in response to DNA damage. These modifications modulate the RPA interactions with its protein partners and control the DNA damage signaling pathways. The review considers up-to-date data on the RPA function as an active coordinator of ssDNA intermediate processing within DNA metabolic pathways, DNA repair in particular.

Interplay between Ku and Replication Protein A in the Restriction of Exo1-mediated DNA Break End Resection

DNA double-strand breaks can be eliminated via non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination. Non-homologous end joining is initiated by the association of Ku with DNA ends. In contrast, homologous recombination entails nucleolytic resection of the 5'-strands, forming 3'-ssDNA tails that become coated with replication protein A (RPA). Ku restricts end access by the resection nuclease Exo1. It is unclear how partial resection might affect Ku engagement and Exo1 restriction. Here, we addressed these questions in a reconstituted system with yeast proteins. With blunt-ended DNA, Ku protected against Exo1 in a manner that required its DNA end-binding activity. Despite binding poorly to ssDNA, Ku could nonetheless engage a 5'-recessed DNA end with a 40-nucleotide (nt) ssDNA overhang, where it localized to the ssDNA-dsDNA junction and efficiently blocked resection by Exo1. Interestingly, RPA could exclude Ku from a partially resected structure with a 22-nt ssDNA tail and thus restored processing by Exo1. However, at a 40-nt tail, Ku remained stably associated at the ssDNA-dsDNA junction, and RPA simultaneously engaged the ssDNA region. We discuss a model in which the dynamic equilibrium between Ku and RPA binding to a partially resected DNA end influences the timing and efficiency of the resection process.

Single Molecule Studies of RPA's Sequential Binding to ssDNA Reveals a Highly Stiff and Stable State Induced by the Binding of Zinc

Replication protein A (RPA) is a prototypical modular eukaryotic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein that has essential biological function in virtually all DNA transactions in cell. In this work we used magnetic tweezers to study the sequential engagement of RPA to single large ssDNA molecule in real time. Using mechanical manipulation of single ssDNA tethers, we found that binding of RPA causes ssDNA to rapidly extend and elongate reaching a steady state within several minutes. Analysis of RPA's effect on the force-extension curve of ssDNA reveals a increased effective persistence length at RPA binding, which indicates a moderate stiffening effect of RPA on ssDNA backbone. Further analysis of RPA's occupation fraction on ssDNA at varying RPA concentration shows that RPA's ssDNA binding is largely non-cooperative with an interesting non-monotonic salt concentration dependent binding affinity. Upon examination of the effect of biometals, we discovered a unique role of zinc on RPA's ssDNA binding: zinc in micromolar concentrations drives formation of a significantly stiffer and more compact RPA coated ssDNA state. These results together provide new mechanochemical insights to the influences and the mechanisms of action of RPA on large single ssDNA substrate.

Force Regulated Association Dynamics of RPA on Forked DNA

Replication protein A (RPA) is involved in virtually all aspects of eukaryotic DNA processing, including replication, recombination and repair. The strong binding of RPA to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which provides protection from nucleolytic cleavage, is well established. Binding to partially double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and disruption of DNA intermediates possessing secondary structures was reported previously, however the underlying mechanism remains unclear.Utilizing single-molecule magnetic tweezers, we now show that both human and yeast RPA can open a DNA hairpin subjected to force. For this well-defined substrate geometry which closely mimics a replication fork, we measured the force-dependent RPA association and dissociation, whilst resolving individual binding events.To explain the observed helix opening activity, we propose a passive model: Transient openings of the DNA helix, enhanced by stronger forces, become trapped by RPA binding. When the force is reduced, dissociation is driven by helix rehybridization. This leads to an exponential dependence of the association and dissociation rates on the applied force, in agreement with our data.By extrapolating our measured rates, we conjecture that RPA does not disrupt dsDNA on its own in the absence of force, but rather seems to rely on the active unwinding of a helicase. RPA could then strongly bind and protect ssDNA produced in its wake, providing a scaffold for the recruitment of further DNA processing enzymes. While the fork is held open, changes to the force exerted by downstream enzymes may regulate the degree of RPA binding on the ssDNA. Upon completion of the DNA processing step the fork would become unblocked. Rapid helix rehybridization then expels RPA from the ssDNA with dissociation rates on the order of hundreds of base-pairs per second, such that the completely processed dsDNA is returned to its native RPA-unbound state.

Chemical inhibitor targeting the replication protein A–DNA interaction increases the efficacy of Pt-based chemotherapy in lung and ovarian cancer

Platinum-based chemotherapeutics exert their therapeutic efficacy via the formation of DNA adducts which interfere with DNA replication, transcription and cell division and ultimately induce cell death. Repair and tolerance of these Pt-DNA lesions by nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination (HR) can substantially reduce the effectiveness of therapy. Inhibition of these repair pathways, therefore, holds the potential to sensitize cancer cells to Pt treatment and increase clinical efficacy. Replication Protein A (RPA) plays essential roles in both NER and HR, along with its role in DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoint activation. Each of these functions is, in part, mediated by RPA binding to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Here we report the synthesis and characterization of novel derivatives of RPA small molecule inhibitors and their activity in models of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have synthesized analogs of our previously reported RPA inhibitor TDRL-505 and determined the structure–activity relationships. These data led us to the identification of TDRL-551, which exhibited a greater than 2-fold increase in in vitro activity. TDRL-551 showed synergy with Pt in tissue culture models of EOC and in vivo efficacy, as a single agent and in combination with platinum, in a NSCLC xenograft model. These data demonstrate the utility of RPA inhibition in EOC and NSCLC and the potential in developing novel anticancer therapeutics that target RPA–DNA interactions.

Replication protein A: single-stranded DNA's first responder: dynamic DNA-interactions allow replication protein A to direct single-strand DNA intermediates into different pathways for synthesis or repair.

Replication protein A (RPA), the major single-stranded DNA-binding protein in eukaryotic cells, is required for processing of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates found in replication, repair, and recombination. Recent studies have shown that RPA binding to ssDNA is highly dynamic and that more than high-affinity binding is needed for function. Analysis of DNA binding mutants identified forms of RPA with reduced affinity for ssDNA that are fully active, and other mutants with higher affinity that are inactive. Single molecule studies showed that while RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity, the RPA complex can rapidly diffuse along ssDNA and be displaced by other proteins that act on ssDNA. Finally, dynamic DNA binding allows RPA to prevent error-prone repair of double-stranded breaks and promote error-free repair. Together, these findings suggest a new paradigm where RPA acts as a first responder at sites with ssDNA, thereby actively coordinating DNA repair and DNA synthesis.

Structural analysis of replication protein A recruitment of the DNA damage response protein SMARCAL1.

SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A-like1 (SMARCAL1) is a recently identified DNA damage response protein involved in remodeling stalled replication forks. The eukaryotic single-strand DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA) recruits SMARCAL1 to stalled forks in vivo and facilitates regression of forks containing leading strand gaps. Both activities are mediated by a direct interaction between an RPA binding motif (RBM) at the N-terminus of SMARCAL1 and the C-terminal winged-helix domain of the RPA 32 kDa subunit (RPA32C). Here we report a biophysical and structural characterization of the SMARCAL1–RPA interaction. Isothermal titration calorimetry and circular dichroism spectroscopy revealed that RPA32C binds SMARCAL1-RBM with a Kd of 2.5 μM and induces a disorder-to-helix transition. The crystal structure of RPA32C was refined to 1.4 Å resolution, and the SMARCAL1-RBM binding site was mapped on the structure on the basis of nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift perturbations. Conservation of the interaction surface to other RBM-containing proteins allowed construction of a model for the RPA32C/SMARCAL1-RBM complex. The implications of our results are discussed with respect to the recruitment of SMARCAL1 and other DNA damage response and repair proteins to stalled replication forks.

G-quadruplex formation in telomeres enhances POT1/TPP1 protection against RPA binding

Human telomeres terminate with a single-stranded 3' G overhang, which can be recognized as a DNA damage site by replication protein A (RPA). The protection of telomeres (POT1)/POT1-interacting protein 1 (TPP1) heterodimer binds specifically to single-stranded telomeric DNA (ssTEL) and protects G overhangs against RPA binding. The G overhang spontaneously folds into various G-quadruplex (GQ) conformations. It remains unclear whether GQ formation affects the ability of POT1/TPP1 to compete against RPA to access ssTEL. Using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer, we showed that POT1 stably loads to a minimal DNA sequence adjacent to a folded GQ. At 150 mM K(+), POT1 loading unfolds the antiparallel GQ, as the parallel conformation remains folded. POT1/TPP1 loading blocks RPA's access to both folded and unfolded telomeres by two orders of magnitude. This protection is not observed at 150 mM Na(+), in which ssTEL forms only a less-stable antiparallel GQ. These results suggest that GQ formation of telomeric overhangs may contribute to suppression of DNA damage signals.

XPF-ERCC1: On the Bubble

In this issue of Structure, Das et al. report the structure of the helix-hairpin-helix dimerization domain of XPF bound to ssDNA. These results provide insight into the architecture of nucleotide excision repair machinery and how it interacts with damaged DNA substrates.

Repair-specific Functions of Replication Protein A

Replication protein A (RPA), the major eukaryotic single-strand DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein, is essential for replication, repair, recombination, and checkpoint activation. Defects in RPA-associated cellular activities lead to genomic instability, a major factor in the pathogenesis of cancer and other diseases. ssDNA binding activity is primarily mediated by two domains in the 70-kDa subunit of the RPA complex. These ssDNA interactions are mediated by a combination of polar residues and four conserved aromatic residues. Mutation of the aromatic residues causes a modest decrease in binding to long (30-nucleotide) ssDNA fragments but results in checkpoint activation and cell cycle arrest in cells. We have used a combination of biochemical analysis and knockdown replacement studies in cells to determine the contribution of these aromatic residues to RPA function. Cells containing the aromatic residue mutants were able to progress normally through S-phase but were defective in DNA repair. Biochemical characterization revealed that mutation of the aromatic residues severely decreased binding to short ssDNA fragments less than 20 nucleotides long. These data indicate that altered binding of RPA to short ssDNA intermediates causes a defect in DNA repair but not in DNA replication. These studies show that cells require different RPA functions in DNA replication and DNA repair.

What Structural Elements make a G-Quadruplex Physiologically Viable?

As much as 375,000 potential G-Quadruplex forming sequences (PQS) have been identified in the human genome nevertheless conclusive demonstration of existence and relevance of these structures in vivo has been challenging. Along with the abundance of the PQS, a variety of proteins have also been demonstrated to efficiently destabilize G-Quadruplex (GQ) structures in vitro, suggesting the possibility that most GQ forming PQS are rapidly identified and unfolded by these proteins. In an attempt to perform a systematic study of GQ-protein interactions we selected Replication Protein A (RPA) as a model system and studied the interactions of RPA with 10 different GQ constructs with varying loop lengths and number of tetrad layers. RPA is the most abundant single strand DNA binding protein in eukaryotes, is involved in DNA replication and repair along with telomere maintenance, making it an ideal model system for this study. Single molecule FRET and bulk biophysical methods were used to perform these studies. Our results demonstrate a systematic increase in the stability of GQ structures against RPA unfolding as the loop lengths are shortened or the number of tetrad layers is increased. Certain GQ constructs were completely unfolded at RPA concentrations several orders of magnitude less than physiological RPA concentration, suggesting that they would not be viable in vivo. Interestingly, the time it takes for an RPA molecule to unfold a GQ construct does not depend on the number of layers the GQ has, suggesting that binding of RPA to GQ is the rate limiting step and that binding affinity decreases as the number of layers is increased. The implications of our data in terms of a molecular understanding of RPA-GQ interactions will be discussed along with our preliminary attempts to model this system.

RING Finger and WD Repeat Domain 3 (RFWD3) Associates with Replication Protein A (RPA) and Facilitates RPA-mediated DNA Damage Response

DNA damage response is crucial for maintaining genomic integrity and preventing cancer by coordinating the activation of checkpoints and the repair of damaged DNA. Central to DNA damage response are the two checkpoint kinases ATM and ATR that phosphorylate a wide range of substrates. RING finger and WD repeat domain 3 (RFWD3) was initially identified as a substrate of ATM/ATR from a proteomic screen. Subsequent studies showed that RFWD3 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that ubiquitinates p53 in vitro and positively regulates p53 levels in response to DNA damage. We report here that RFWD3 associates with replication protein A (RPA), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein that plays essential roles in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Binding of RPA to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which is generated by DNA damage and repair, is essential for the recruitment of DNA repair factors to damaged sites and the activation of checkpoint signaling. We show that RFWD3 is physically associated with RPA and rapidly localizes to sites of DNA damage in a RPA-dependent manner. In vitro experiments suggest that the C terminus of RFWD3, which encompass the coiled-coil domain and the WD40 domain, is necessary for binding to RPA. Furthermore, DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of RPA and RFWD3 is dependent upon each other. Consequently, loss of RFWD3 results in the persistent foci of DNA damage marker γH2AX and the repair protein Rad51 in damaged cells. These findings suggest that RFWD3 is recruited to sites of DNA damage and facilitates RPA-mediated DNA damage signaling and repair.

TERRA and hnRNPA1 orchestrate an RPA-to-POT1 switch on telomeric single-stranded DNA

Maintenance of telomeres requires both DNA replication and telomere ‘capping’ by shelterin. These two processes employ two single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding proteins, replication protein A (RPA) and protection of telomeres 1 (POT1). Although RPA and POT1 each have a critical role at telomeres, how they function in concert is not clear. POT1 ablation leads to activation of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) checkpoint kinase at telomeres1, 2, suggesting that POT1 antagonizes RPA binding to telomeric ssDNA. Unexpectedly, we found that purified POT1 and its functional partner TPP1 are unable to efficiently prevent RPA binding to telomeric ssDNA. In cell extracts, we identified a novel activity that specifically displaces RPA, but not POT1, from telomeric ssDNA. Using purified protein, we show that the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNPA1) recapitulates the RPA displacing activity. The RPA displacing activity is inhibited by the telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA) in early S phase, but is then unleashed in late S phase when TERRA levels decline at telomeres3. Interestingly, TERRA also promotes POT1 binding to telomeric ssDNA by removing hnRNPA1, suggesting that the reaccumulation of TERRA after S phase helps to complete the RPA-to-POT1 switch on telomeric ssDNA. Together, our data suggest that hnRNPA1, TERRA, and POT1 act in concert to displace RPA from telomeric ssDNA following DNA replication, and promote telomere capping to preserve genomic integrity.

Nucleotide Excision Repair by Mutant Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A (XPA) Proteins with Deficiency in Interaction with RPA

The xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) is a core component of nucleotide excision repair (NER). To coordinate early stage NER, XPA interacts with various proteins, including replication protein A (RPA), ERCC1, DDB2, and TFIIH, in addition to UV-damaged or chemical carcinogen-damaged DNA. In this study, we investigated the effects of mutations in the RPA binding regions of XPA on XPA function in NER. XPA binds through an N-terminal region to the middle subunit (RPA32) of the RPA heterotrimer and through a central region that overlaps with its damaged DNA binding region to the RPA70 subunit. In cell-free NER assays, an N-terminal deletion mutant of XPA showed loss of binding to RPA32 and reduced DNA repair activity, but it could still bind to UV-damaged DNA and RPA. In contrast, amino acid substitutions in the central region reduced incisions at the damaged site in the cell-free NER assay, and four of these mutants (K141A, T142A, K167A, and K179A) showed reduced binding to RPA70 but normal binding to damaged DNA. Furthermore, mutants that had one of the four aforementioned substitutions and an N-terminal deletion exhibited lower DNA incision activity and binding to RPA than XPA with only one of these substitutions or the deletion. Taken together, these results indicate that XPA interaction with both RPA32 and RPA70 is indispensable for NER reactions.

DDK Phosphorylates Checkpoint Clamp Component Rad9 and Promotes Its Release from Damaged Chromatin

When inappropriate DNA structures arise, they are sensed by DNA structure-dependent checkpoint pathways and subsequently repaired. Recruitment of checkpoint proteins to such structures precedes recruitment of proteins involved in DNA metabolism. Thus, checkpoints can regulate DNA metabolism. We show that fission yeast Rad9, a 9-1-1 heterotrimeric checkpoint-clamp component, is phosphorylated by Hsk1(Cdc7), the Schizosaccharomyces pombeDbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) homolog, in response to replication-induced DNA damage. Phosphorylation of Rad9 disrupts its interaction with replication protein A (RPA) and is dependent on 9-1-1 chromatin loading, the Rad9-associated protein Rad4/Cut5(TopBP1), and prior phosphorylation by Rad3(ATR). rad9 mutants defective in DDK phosphorylation show wild-type checkpoint responses but abnormal DNA repair protein foci and decreased viability after replication stress. We propose that Rad9 phosphorylation by DDK releases Rad9 from DNA damage sites to facilitate DNA repair.

Localization of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein and replication protein A on damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair

The interaction of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA) with damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair (NER) was studied using model dsDNA and bubble-DNA structure with 5-{3-[6-(carboxyamido-fluoresceinyl)amidocapromoyl]allyl}-dUMP lesions in one strand and containing photoreactive 5-iodo-dUMP residues in defined positions. Interactions of XPA and RPA with damaged and undamaged DNA strands were investigated by DNA–protein photocrosslinking and gel shift analysis. XPA showed two maximums of crosslinking intensities located on the 5′-side from a lesion. RPA mainly localized on undamaged strand of damaged DNA duplex and damaged bubble-DNA structure. These results presented for the first time the direct evidence for the localization of XPA in the 5′-side of the lesion and suggested the key role of XPA orientation in conjunction with RPA binding to undamaged strand for the positioning of the NER preincision complex. The findings supported the mechanism of loading of the heterodimer consisting of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 and xeroderma pigmentosum group F proteins by XPA on the 5′-side from the lesion before damaged strand incision. Importantly, the proper orientation of XPA and RPA in the stage of preincision was achieved in the absence of TFIIH and XPG.

The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks

Mutations in SMARCAL1 (HARP) cause Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia (SIOD). The mechanistic basis for this disease is unknown. Using functional genomic screens, we identified SMARCAL1 as a genome maintenance protein. Silencing and overexpression of SMARCAL1 leads to activation of the DNA damage response during S phase in the absence of any genotoxic agent. SMARCAL1 contains a Replication protein A (RPA)-binding motif similar to that found in the replication stress response protein TIPIN (Timeless-Interacting Protein), which is both necessary and sufficient to target SMARCAL1 to stalled replication forks. RPA binding is critical for the cellular function of SMARCAL1; however, it is not necessary for the annealing helicase activity of SMARCAL1 in vitro. An SIOD-associated SMARCAL1 mutant fails to prevent replication-associated DNA damage from accumulating in cells in which endogenous SMARCAL1 is silenced. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM and Rad3-related (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) phosphorylate SMARCAL1 in response to replication stress. Loss of SMARCAL1 activity causes increased RPA loading onto chromatin and persistent RPA phosphorylation after a transient exposure to replication stress. Furthermore, SMARCAL1-deficient cells are hypersensitive to replication stress agents. Thus, SMARCAL1 is a replication stress response protein, and the pleiotropic phenotypes of SIOD are at least partly due to defects in genome maintenance during DNA replication.