Chromosomal Replication Origin Research Articles

The budding yeast Fkh1 Forkhead associated (FHA) domain promotes a G1-chromatin state and the activity of chromosomal DNA replication origins.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the forkhead (Fkh) transcription factor Fkh1 (forkhead homolog) enhances the activity of many DNA replication origins that act in early S-phase (early origins). Current models posit that Fkh1 acts directly to promote these origins' activity by binding to origin-adjacent Fkh1 binding sites (FKH sites). However, the post-DNA binding functions that Fkh1 uses to promote early origin activity are poorly understood. Fkh1 contains a conserved FHA (forkhead associated) domain, a protein-binding module with specificity for phosphothreonine (pT)-containing partner proteins. At a small subset of yeast origins, the Fkh1-FHA domain enhances the ORC (origin recognition complex)-origin binding step, the G1-phase event that initiates the origin cycle. However, the importance of the Fkh1-FHA domain to either chromosomal replication or ORC-origin interactions at genome scale is unclear. Here, S-phase SortSeq experiments were used to compare genome replication in proliferating FKH1 and fkh1-R80A mutant cells. The Fkh1-FHA domain promoted the activity of ≈ 100 origins that act in early to mid- S-phase, including the majority of centromere-associated origins, while simultaneously inhibiting ≈ 100 late origins. Thus, in the absence of a functional Fkh1-FHA domain, the temporal landscape of the yeast genome was flattened. Origins are associated with a positioned nucleosome array that frames a nucleosome depleted region (NDR) over the origin, and ORC-origin binding is necessary but not sufficient for this chromatin organization. To ask whether the Fkh1-FHA domain had an impact on this chromatin architecture at origins, ORC ChIPSeq data generated from proliferating cells and MNaseSeq data generated from G1-arrested and proliferating cell populations were assessed. Origin groups that were differentially regulated by the Fkh1-FHA domain were characterized by distinct effects of this domain on ORC-origin binding and G1-phase chromatin. Thus, the Fkh1-FHA domain controlled the distinct chromatin architecture at early origins in G1-phase and regulated origin activity in S-phase.

The budding yeast Fkh1 Forkhead associated (FHA) domain promoted a G1-chromatin state and the activity of chromosomal DNA replication origins.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the forkhead (Fkh) transcription factor Fkh1 (forkhead homolog) enhances the activity of many DNA replication origins that act in early S-phase (early origins). Current models posit that Fkh1 acts directly to promote these origins' activity by binding to origin-adjacent Fkh1 binding sites (FKH sites). However, the post-DNA binding functions that Fkh1 uses to promote early origin activity are poorly understood. Fkh1 contains a conserved FHA (forkhead associated) domain, a protein-binding module with specificity for phosphothreonine (pT)-containing partner proteins. At a small subset of yeast origins, the Fkh1-FHA domain enhances the ORC (origin recognition complex)-origin binding step, the G1-phase event that initiates the origin cycle. However, the importance of the Fkh1-FHA domain to either chromosomal replication or ORC-origin interactions at genome scale is unclear. Here, S-phase SortSeq experiments were used to compare genome replication in proliferating FKH1 and fkh1-R80A mutant cells. The Fkh1-FHA domain promoted the activity of 100 origins that act in early to mid- S-phase, including the majority of centromere-associated origins, while simultaneously inhibiting 100 late origins. Thus, in the absence of a functional Fkh1-FHA domain, the temporal landscape of the yeast genome was flattened. Origins are associated with a positioned nucleosome array that frames a nucleosome depleted region (NDR) over the origin, and ORC-origin binding is necessary but not sufficient for this chromatin organization. To ask whether the Fkh1-FHA domain had an impact on this chromatin architecture at origins, ORC ChIPSeq data generated from proliferating cells and MNaseSeq data generated from G1-arrested and proliferating cell populations were assessed. Origin groups that were differentially regulated by the Fkh1-FHA domain were characterized by distinct effects of this domain on ORC-origin binding and G1-phase chromatin. Thus, the Fkh1-FHA domain controlled the distinct chromatin architecture at early origins in G1-phase and regulated origin activity in S-phase.

Toward an understanding of the DNA replication initiation in bacteria.

Although the mechanism of DNA replication initiation has been investigated for over 50 years, many important discoveries have been made related to this process in recent years. In this mini-review, we discuss the current state of knowledge concerning the structure of the origin region in bacterial chromosomes and plasmids, recently discovered motifs recognized by replication initiator proteins, and proposed in the literature models describing initial origin opening. We review structures of nucleoprotein complexes formed by replication initiators at chromosomal and plasmid replication origins and discuss their functional implications. We also discuss future research challenges in this field.

Where and when to start: Regulating DNA replication origin activity in eukaryotic genomes

ABSTRACT In eukaryotic genomes, hundreds to thousands of potential start sites of DNA replication named origins are dispersed across each of the linear chromosomes. During S-phase, only a subset of origins is selected in a stochastic manner to assemble bidirectional replication forks and initiate DNA synthesis. Despite substantial progress in our understanding of this complex process, a comprehensive ‘identity code’ that defines origins based on specific nucleotide sequences, DNA structural features, the local chromatin environment, or 3D genome architecture is still missing. In this article, we review the genetic and epigenetic features of replication origins in yeast and metazoan chromosomes and highlight recent insights into how this flexibility in origin usage contributes to nuclear organization, cell growth, differentiation, and genome stability.

A Versatile Toolset for Genetic Manipulation of the Wine Yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum.

Hanseniaspora uvarum is an ascomycetous yeast that frequently dominates the population in the first two days of wine fermentations. It contributes to the production of many beneficial as well as detrimental aroma compounds. While the genome sequence of the diploid type strain DSM 2768 has been largely elucidated, transformation by electroporation was only recently achieved. We here provide an elaborate toolset for the genetic manipulation of this yeast. A chromosomal replication origin was isolated and used for the construction of episomal, self-replicating cloning vectors. Moreover, homozygous auxotrophic deletion markers (Huura3, Huhis3, Huleu2, Huade2) have been obtained in the diploid genome as future recipients and a proof of principle for the application of PCR-based one-step gene deletion strategies. Besides a hygromycin resistance cassette, a kanamycin resistance gene was established as a dominant marker for selection on G418. Recyclable deletion cassettes flanked by loxP-sites and the corresponding Cre-recombinase expression vectors were tailored. Moreover, we report on a chemical transformation procedure with the use of freeze-competent cells. Together, these techniques and constructs pave the way for efficient and targeted manipulations of H. uvarum.

Integrated analysis of multiple bioinformatics studies to identify microRNA-target gene-transcription factor regulatory networks in retinoblastoma.

BackgroundIn children, retinoblastoma (RB) is one of the most common primary malignant ocular tumors and has a poor prognosis and high mortality. To understand the molecular mechanisms of RB, we identified microRNAs (miRNAs), key genes and transcription factors (TFs) using bioinformatics analysis to build potential miRNA-gene-TF networks.MethodsWe collected three gene expression profiles and one miRNA expression profile from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We used the limma R package to identify overlapping differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed miRNAs in RB tissues compared to noncancer tissues. The robust rank aggregation (RRA) method was implemented to identify key genes among the DEGs. Then, miRNA-key gene-TF networks were built using the online tools TransmiR and miRTarBase. Next, we used RT-qPCR to confirm the results.ResultsWe identified 180 DEGs in RB tissues compared to nontumor tissues using integrative analysis, among which 109 genes were upregulated and 71 were downregulated. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that these DEGs were primarily involved with chromosome segregation, condensed chromosome and DNA replication origin binding. The most highly enriched pathways obtained in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were cell cycle, DNA replication, homologous recombination, P53 signaling pathway and pyrimidine metabolism. Furthermore, two key differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were also established: let-7a and let-7b. Finally, the potential regulatory networks of miRNA-target gene-TFs were examined.ConclusionsThis study identified key genes and built miRNA-target gene-TF regulatory networks in RB, which will deepen our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of RB. These key genes and miRNAs may be potential targets and biomarkers for RB diagnosis and therapy.

Molecular basis for DarT ADP-ribosylation of a DNA base.

ADP-ribosyltransferases use NAD+ to catalyse substrate ADP-ribosylation1, and thereby regulate cellular pathways or contribute to toxin-mediated pathogenicity of bacteria2-4. Reversible ADP-ribosylation has traditionally been considered a protein-specific modification5, but recent in vitro studies have suggested nucleic acids as targets6-9. Here we present evidence that specific, reversible ADP-ribosylation of DNA on thymidine bases occurs in cellulo through the DarT-DarG toxin-antitoxin system, which is found in a variety of bacteria (including global pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa)10. We report the structure of DarT, which identifies this protein as a diverged member of the PARP family. We provide a set of high-resolution structures of this enzyme in ligand-free and pre- and post-reaction states, which reveals a specialized mechanism of catalysis that includes a key active-site arginine that extends the canonical ADP-ribosyltransferase toolkit. Comparison with PARP-HPF1, a well-established DNArepair protein ADP-ribosylation complex, offers insights into how the DarT class of ADP-ribosyltransferases evolved into specific DNA-modifying enzymes. Together, our structural and mechanistic data provide details of this PARPfamily member and contribute to a fundamental understanding of the ADP-ribosylation of nucleic acids. We also show that thymine-linked ADP-ribose DNA adducts reversed by DarG antitoxin (functioning as a noncanonical DNArepair factor) are used not only for targeted DNA damage to induce toxicity, but also as a signalling strategy for cellular processes. Using M.tuberculosis as an exemplar, we show that DarT-DarG regulates growth by ADP-ribosylation of DNA at the origin of chromosome replication.

The Pseudoalteromonas multipartite genome: distribution and expression of pangene categories, and a hypothesis for the origin and evolution of the chromid.

Bacterial genomes typically consist of one large chromosome, but can also include secondary replicons. These so-called multipartite genomes are scattered on the bacterial tree of life with the majority of cases belonging to Proteobacteria. Within the class gamma-proteobacteria, multipartite genomes are restricted to the two families Vibrionaceae and Pseudoalteromonadaceae. Whereas the genome of vibrios is well studied, information on the Pseudoalteromonadaceae genome is much scarcer. We have studied Pseudoalteromonadaceae with respect to the origin of the chromid, how pangene categories are distributed, how genes are expressed relative to their genomic location, and identified chromid hallmark genes. We calculated the Pseudoalteromonadaceae pangenome based on 25 complete genomes and found that core/softcore are significantly overrepresented in late replicating sectors of the chromid, regardless of how the chromid is replicated. On the chromosome, core/softcore and shell/cloud genes are only weakly overrepresented at the chromosomal replication origin and termination sequences, respectively. Gene expression is trending downwards with increasing distance from the chromosomal oriC, whereas the chromidal expression pattern is more complex. Moreover, we identified 78 chromid hallmark genes, and BLASTp searches suggest that the majority of them were acquired from the ancestral gene pool of Alteromonadales. Finally, our data strongly suggest that the chromid originates from a plasmid that was acquired in a relatively recent event. In summary, this study extends our knowledge on multipartite genomes, and helps us understand how and why secondary replicons are acquired, why they are maintained, and how they are shaped by evolution.

Completed Genomic Sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis HER1410 Reveals a Cry-Containing Chromosome, Two Megaplasmids, and an Integrative Plasmidial Prophage.

Bacillus thuringiensis is the most used biopesticide in agriculture. Its entomopathogenic capacity stems from the possession of plasmid-borne insecticidal crystal genes (cry), traditionally used as discriminant taxonomic feature for that species. As such, crystal and plasmid identification are key to the characterization of this species. To date, about 600 B. thuringiensis genomes have been reported, but less than 5% have been completed, while the other draft genomes are incomplete, hindering full plasmid delineation. Here we present the complete genome of Bacillus thuringiensis HER1410, a strain closely related to B. thuringiensis entomocidus and a known host for a variety of Bacillus phages. The combination of short and long-read techniques allowed fully resolving the genome and delineation of three plasmids. This enabled the accurate detection of an unusual location of a unique cry gene, cry1Ba4, located in a genomic island near the chromosome replication origin. Two megaplasmids, pLUSID1 and pLUSID2 could be delineated: pLUSID1 (368 kb), a likely conjugative plasmid involved in virulence, and pLUSID2 (156 kb) potentially related to the sporulation process. A smaller plasmidial prophage pLUSID3, with a dual lifestyle whose integration within the chromosome causes the disruption of a flagellar key component. Finally, phylogenetic analysis placed this strain within a clade comprising members from the B. thuringiensis serovar thuringiensis and other serovars and with B. cereus s. s. in agreement with the intermingled taxonomy of B. cereus sensu lato group.

Rapid Lentiviral Vector Producer Cell Line Generation Using a Single DNA Construct

Stable suspension producer cell lines for the production of vesicular stomatitis virus envelope glycoprotein (VSVg)-pseudotyped lentiviral vectors represent an attractive alternative to current widely used production methods based on transient transfection of adherent 293T cells with multiple plasmids. We report here a method to rapidly generate such producer cell lines from 293T cells by stable transfection of a single DNA construct encoding all lentiviral vector components. The resulting suspension cell lines yield titers as high as can be achieved with transient transfection, can be readily scaled up in single-use stirred-tank bioreactors, and are genetically and functionally stable in extended cell culture. By removing the requirement for efficient transient transfection during upstream processing of lentiviral vectors and switching to an inherently scalable suspension cell culture format, we believe that this approach will result in significantly higher batch yields than are possible with current manufacturing processes and enable better patient access to medicines based on lentiviral vectors.

Intracellular Growth and Cell Cycle Progression are Dependent on (p)ppGpp Synthetase/Hydrolase in Brucella abortus.

Brucella abortus is a pathogenic bacterium able to proliferate inside host cells. During the first steps of its trafficking, it is able to block the progression of its cell cycle, remaining at the G1 stage for several hours, before it reaches its replication niche. We hypothesized that starvation mediated by guanosine tetra- or penta-phosphate, (p)ppGpp, could be involved in the cell cycle arrest. Rsh is the (p)ppGpp synthetase/hydrolase. A B. abortus ∆rsh mutant is unable to grow in minimal medium, it is unable to survive in stationary phase in rich medium and it is unable to proliferate inside RAW 264.7 macrophages. A strain producing the heterologous constitutive (p)ppGpp hydrolase Mesh1b is also unable to proliferate inside these macrophages. Altogether, these data suggest that (p)ppGpp is necessary to allow B. abortus to adapt to its intracellular growth conditions. The deletion of dksA, proposed to mediate a part of the effect of (p)ppGpp on transcription, does not affect B. abortus growth in culture or inside macrophages. Expression of a gene coding for a constitutively active (p)ppGpp synthetase slows down growth in rich medium and inside macrophages. Using an mCherry–ParB fusion able to bind to the replication origin of the main chromosome of B. abortus, we observed that expression of the constitutive (p)ppGpp synthetase gene generates an accumulation of bacteria at the G1 phase. We thus propose that (p)ppGpp accumulation could be one of the factors contributing to the G1 arrest observed for B. abortus in RAW 264.7 macrophages.

Chromosome Segregation Proteins as Coordinators of Cell Cycle in Response to Environmental Conditions.

Chromosome segregation is a crucial stage of the cell cycle. In general, proteins involved in this process are DNA-binding proteins, and in most bacteria, ParA and ParB are the main players; however, some bacteria manage this process by employing other proteins, such as condensins. The dynamic interaction between ParA and ParB drives movement and exerts positioning of the chromosomal origin of replication (oriC) within the cell. In addition, both ParA and ParB were shown to interact with the other proteins, including those involved in cell division or cell elongation. The significance of these interactions for the progression of the cell cycle is currently under investigation. Remarkably, DNA binding by ParA and ParB as well as their interactions with protein partners conceivably may be modulated by intra- and extracellular conditions. This notion provokes the question of whether chromosome segregation can be regarded as a regulatory stage of the cell cycle. To address this question, we discuss how environmental conditions affect chromosome segregation and how segregation proteins influence other cell cycle processes.

Chromosomal origin of replication coordinates logically distinct types of bacterial genetic regulation

For a long time it has been hypothesized that bacterial gene regulation involves an intricate interplay of the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) and the spatial organization of genes in the chromosome. Here we explore this hypothesis both on a structural and on a functional level. On the structural level, we study the TRN as a spatially embedded network. On the functional level, we analyze gene expression patterns from a network perspective (“digital control”), as well as from the perspective of the spatial organization of the chromosome (“analog control”). Our structural analysis reveals the outstanding relevance of the symmetry axis defined by the origin (Ori) and terminus (Ter) of replication for the network embedding and, thus, suggests the co-evolution of two regulatory infrastructures, namely the transcriptional regulatory network and the spatial arrangement of genes on the chromosome, to optimize the cross-talk between two fundamental biological processes: genomic expression and replication. This observation is confirmed by the functional analysis based on the differential gene expression patterns of more than 4000 pairs of microarray and RNA-Seq datasets for E. coli from the Colombos Database using complex network and machine learning methods. This large-scale analysis supports the notion that two logically distinct types of genetic control are cooperating to regulate gene expression in a complementary manner. Moreover, we find that the position of the gene relative to the Ori is a feature of very high predictive value for gene expression, indicating that the Ori–Ter symmetry axis coordinates the action of distinct genetic control mechanisms.

The role of Helicobacter pylori DnaA domain I in orisome assembly on a bipartite origin of chromosome replication.

The main roles of the DnaA protein are to bind the origin of chromosome replication (oriC), to unwind DNA and to provide a hub for the step-wise assembly of a replisome. DnaA is composed of four domains, with each playing a distinct functional role in the orisome assembly. Out of the four domains, the role of domain I is the least understood and appears to be the most species-specific. To better characterise Helicobacter pylori DnaA domain I, we have constructed a series of DnaA variants and studied their interactions with H. pylori bipartite oriC. We show that domain I is responsible for the stabilisation and organisation of DnaA-oriC complexes and provides cooperativity in DnaA-DNA interactions. Domain I mediates cross-interactions between oriC subcomplexes, which indicates that domain I is important for long-distance DnaA interactions and is essential for orisosme assembly on bipartite origins. HobA, which interacts with domain I, increases the DnaA binding to bipartite oriC; however, it does not stimulate but rather inhibits DNA unwinding. This suggests that HobA helps DnaA to bind oriC, but an unknown factor triggers DNA unwinding. Together, our results indicate that domain I self-interaction is important for the DnaA assembly on bipartite H. pylori oriC.

Streptomycete origin of chromosomal replication with two putative unwinding elements.

DNA replication is controlled mostly at the initiation step. In bacteria, replication of the chromosome starts at a single origin of replication called oriC. The initiator protein, DnaA, binds to specific sequences (DnaA boxes) within oriC and assembles into a filament that promotes DNA double helix opening within the DNA unwinding element (DUE). This process has been thoroughly examined in model bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, but we have a relatively limited understanding of chromosomal replication initiation in other species. Here, we reveal new details of DNA replication initiation in Streptomyces, a group of Gram-positive soil bacteria that possesses a long linear (8-10 Mbps) and GC-rich chromosome with a centrally positioned oriC. We used comprehensive in silico, in vitro and in vivo analyses to better characterize the structure of Streptomyces oriC. We identified 14 DnaA-binding motifs and determined the consensus sequence of the DnaA box. Unexpectedly, our in silico analysis using the WebSIDD algorithm revealed the presence of two putative Streptomyces DUEs (DUE1 and DUE2) located very near one another toward the 5' end of the oriC region. In vitro P1 nuclease assay revealed that DNA unwinding occurs at both of the proposed sites, but using an in vivo replication initiation point mapping, we were able to confirm only one of them (DUE2). The previously observed transcriptional activity of the Streptomyces oriC region may help explain the current results. We speculate that transcription itself could modulate oriC activity in Streptomyces by determining whether DNA unwinding occurs at DUE1 or DUE2.

Changing Perspectives on the Role of DnaA-ATP in Orisome Function and Timing Regulation.

Bacteria, like all cells, must precisely duplicate their genomes before they divide. Regulation of this critical process focuses on forming a pre-replicative nucleoprotein complex, termed the orisome. Orisomes perform two essential mechanical tasks that configure the unique chromosomal replication origin, oriC to start a new round of chromosome replication: (1) unwinding origin DNA and (2) assisting with loading of the replicative DNA helicase on exposed single strands. In Escherichia coli, a necessary orisome component is the ATP-bound form of the bacterial initiator protein, DnaA. DnaA-ATP differs from DnaA-ADP in its ability to oligomerize into helical filaments, and in its ability to access a subset of low affinity recognition sites in the E. coli replication origin. The helical filaments have been proposed to play a role in both of the key mechanical tasks, but recent studies raise new questions about whether they are mandatory for orisome activity. It was recently shown that a version of E. coli oriC (oriCallADP), whose multiple low affinity DnaA recognition sites bind DnaA-ATP and DnaA-ADP similarly, was fully occupied and unwound by DnaA-ADP in vitro, and in vivo suppressed the lethality of DnaA mutants defective in ATP binding and ATP-specific oligomerization. However, despite their functional equivalency, orisomes assembled on oriCallADP were unable to trigger chromosome replication at the correct cell cycle time and displayed a hyper-initiation phenotype. Here we present a new perspective on DnaA-ATP, and suggest that in E. coli, DnaA-ATP is not required for mechanical functions, but rather is needed for site recognition and occupation, so that initiation timing is coupled to DnaA-ATP levels. We also discuss how other bacterial types may utilize DnaA-ATP and DnaA-ADP, and whether the high diversity of replication origins in the bacterial world reflects different regulatory strategies for how DnaA-ATP is used to control orisome assembly.

Self-organised segregation of bacterial chromosomal origins.

The chromosomal replication origin region (ori) of characterised bacteria is dynamically positioned throughout the cell cycle. In slowly growing Escherichia coli, ori is maintained at mid-cell from birth until its replication, after which newly replicated sister oris move to opposite quarter positions. Here, we provide an explanation for ori positioning based on the self-organisation of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes complex, MukBEF, which forms dynamically positioned clusters on the chromosome. We propose that a non-trivial feedback between the self-organising gradient of MukBEF complexes and the oris leads to accurate ori positioning. We find excellent agreement with quantitative experimental measurements and confirm key predictions. Specifically, we show that oris exhibit biased motion towards MukBEF clusters, rather than mid-cell. Our findings suggest that MukBEF and oris act together as a self-organising system in chromosome organisation-segregation and introduces protein self-organisation as an important consideration for future studies of chromosome dynamics.

Mutational Analysis of DnaA‐trio Motifs in E. coli OriC Reveals Multiple Modes for Bacterial Replication Origin Activation

The chromosomal replication origin (oriC) in bacteria is a unique region that directs assembly of the orisome, a nucleoprotein complex that unwinds origin DNA and assists with the loading of the replicative helicase. All orisome functions are mediated by the initiator protein, DnaA, which binds to specific sites in oriC, and, after DNA unwinding, binds to and stabilizes the unwound region. Orisome assembly is well characterized in E. coli, but bacterial origins are not conserved with regard to the number and spacing of DnaA recognition sites, and so it is difficult to determine whether there are common sequence patterns that are essential for origin activity. However, one promising feature, the “DnaA‐trio” motif, can be found in the origins of most bacterial types, with multiple copies residing near the AT‐rich region where DNA strand separation takes place. DnaA‐trios are essential for B. subtilis chromosome replication initiation, where they facilitate delivery of DnaA‐ATP oligomeric filaments to the AT‐rich region. Three DnaA‐trio motifs also reside in E. coli oriC, but their role is unclear, since we recently reported that E. coli oriC could be activated without formation of DnaA‐ATP oligomers. Therefore, to test their essentiality in E. coli, we used site‐directed mutagenesis to inactivate the trios, and then used recombineering to replace wild type chromosomal oriC with the mutated versions. Eliminating trio sites had no effect on E. coli oriC activity or initiation timing. Based on these results, we hypothesized that E. coli might use an alternative mechanism to deliver DnaA to the AT‐rich region, one that does not depend on trios or DnaA‐ATP filaments. We hypothesized that the sharp DNA bend formed late in E. coli orisome assembly and stabilized by the DNA bending protein IHF, might eliminate the need for trio sites by positioning the AT‐rich region for cross‐strand DnaA donations provided by the DnaA bound to oriC's left half. To test this, we removed the bend region from oriC using site‐directed mutagenesis, and even though the mutated origin (oriCno bend) contained all three DnaA trios, it was unable to function as the sole chromosomal origin of replication. In vitro unwinding studies suggested that the defect could be caused by a failure to deliver DnaA to the AT‐rich region, so we tried to rescue oriCno bend function by activating a trio‐dependent mode of DnaA delivery. Successful rescue was achieved by inserting a DnaA binding site between R1 and the trio sites, and origin activity became completely dependent on the DnaA‐trio elements. However, rescued cells displayed perturbed initiation timing, suggesting that the bend mode of DnaA delivery plays both mechanical and regulatory roles in E. coli. We propose that there are at least two possible modes of bacterial origin activation; one that depends on DnaA‐trio elements, and one that uses DNA bending and cross‐strand DnaA binding to regulate late stage orisome assembly.Support or Funding InformationNational Institutes of Health (GM54042 to A.L.) and Florida Institute of Technology Holzer Lequear Fund for Molecular Genetics (to J.G.)This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Acinetobacter and Moraxella OriCs are Functional as Chromosomal Replication Origin Transplants in E. coli

Bacterial chromosome replication is triggered by the initiator protein, DnaA, which assembles into a multimeric complex (orisome) that unwinds the replication origin, oriC, and helps to load the replicative DNA helicase. DnaA is highly conserved and the oriCs from nearly all bacteria carry clusters of oriC‐encoded DnaA recognition sites that guide step‐wise and properly timed orisome assembly. However, the arrangement of these sites is widely divergent among bacterial types and prior studies show that heterologous oriCs are only functional in extremely close relatives with nearly identical origin nucleotide sequence. To investigate the basis for DnaA recognition site diversity and possibly identify shared steps in orisome assembly, we replaced E. coli's chromosomal oriC with heterologous donor oriCs from its distant Gammaproteobacterial relatives and measured replication activity in vivo. Despite carrying little sequence similarity to the host, oriCs from Acinetobacter baylyi (ADP1) and Moraxella catarrhalis (ATCC 25240) were active in E. coli and used alternative pathways to assemble E. coli DnaA into functional orisomes. Mapping studies revealed the transplanted oriCs lacked the distinctive DNA unwinding element comprising 13mer repeat motifs as well as the arrayed low affinity DnaA recognition sites that are both hallmarks of E. coli oriC. Using flow cytometry analysis, we found that ADP1 and M. catarrhalis oriCs were also unable to initiate DNA synthesis at the proper cell cycle time in their E. coli hosts. Thus, the mechanisms for initiation timing must be distinct from those that permit replication fork assembly on these origins. We propose that E. coli and ADP1‐type orisomes share a sub‐architecture required for mechanical function (unwinding and helicase loading), but also carry type‐specific variations in the arrangement and affinity of DnaA recognition sites that are required for proper initiation timing using their cognate DnaAs. We propose that replication origin diversity reflects the many varieties of cell cycle‐coupled regulatory mechanisms used to control the availability/accessibility of DnaA at the oriCs of different bacterial types. Further studies of DnaA‐oriC interactions on heterologous origins may also reveal novel targets for broad spectrum bacterial growth inhibitors as well as those for type‐specific inhibition.Support or Funding InformationNational Institutes of Health (GM54042 to AL) and Florida Institute of Technology Holzer Lequear Fund for Molecular Genetics (to JG).This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

DNA Segregation in Natural and Synthetic Minimal Systems.

Faithful segregation of replicated genomes to dividing daughter cells is a major hallmark of cellular life and needs to be part of the future design of the robustly proliferating minimal cell. So far, the complexity of eukaryotic chromosome segregation machineries has limited their applicability to synthetic systems. Prokaryotic plasmid segregation machineries offer promising alternative tools for bottom-up synthetic biology, with the first three-component DNA segregation system being reconstituted a decade ago. In this review, the mechanisms underlying DNA segregation in prokaryotes, with a particular focus on segregation of plasmids and chromosomal replication origins are reviewed, along with a brief discussion of archaeal and eukaryotic systems. In addition, this review shows how in vitro reconstitution has allowed deeper insights into these processes and discusses possible applications of these machineries for a minimal synthetic segrosome as well as the challenge of its coupling to a minimal replisome.