Repeat Mammography Research Articles

The difficult screening mammogram: value of early follow-up

<h2>Abstract</h2> The Sheffield UK prevalent round of breast screening ended in 1993. 30 848 women (acceptance rate 81.1%) underwent mammography. 1249 were recalled for further assessment and either underwent biopsy, were discharged to 3-yearly screening or referred for early follow-up. Indications for recall and outcome for this early follow-up group (191 women) were examined during prevalent and the subsequent incident round. All had abnormal mammography described as probably but not definitely benign. After triple assessment the diagnosis remained equivocal. Follow-up included repeat mammography at 6–12 months to avoid benign biopsy. Women then returned to routine screening or underwent biopsy if the lesion showed mammographic progression. Three women showed progression and subsequent biopsy revealed only one early stage carcinoma. None of 122 patients returning for subsequent screening have required biopsy. Most not reattending for further screening were beyond the upper age limit for screening (65 years) but three patients failed to attend because of anxiety. Early recall is an option for probably benign mammographic lesions remaining equivocal after triple assessment. Mammographic progression is an absolute indication for biopsy. However, the increased anxiety associated with early recall is a disadvantage of this approach.

Variability in the Timing of Repeat Screening Mammography

Background.Although numerous studies have examined repeat mammography, they provide limited information about actual patterns of women's behavior over time. Methods.In this study, 128 asymptomatic women ages 50 to 75 who had had their first mammograms 15 to 27 months previously were interviewed to determine rates of repeat mammography. Eighty-six of these women were HMO members; the remaining 42 were nonmembers. Results.In both subpopulations, repeat mammography rates were low among women interviewed less than 21 months after their first mammogram, but much higher among those interviewed 21 months or more afterward. Conclusions.These data suggest that waiting up to 2 years to have a second mammogram may be at least as common a choice as having it after 1 year. It is of particular interest that this was found in a population of HMO members who receive reminders and vouchers for free mammograms annually.

Who gets repeat screening mammography

To determine rates of, and explore physician factors associated with, repeat mammography, administrative data for 791 women aged 50 years and older were examined. Three-fourths of the women (73%) received repeat mammography (i.e., a second mammogram was obtained within six to 18 months of the first). Provider factors associated with higher repeat mammography rates were: being a woman, practicing in the women's health group rather than the general internal medicine service, and being a fellow or an attending physician (p-values < 0.01). Patients of women attendings/fellows had higher repeat mammography rates than did those of men attendings/fellows, men residents, and women residents. Characteristics (gender, level of training) of providers strongly influence their patients' screening behavior.

Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?

To assess the impact of a breast clinic on a specific target population and evaluate early diagnosis performance indicators for breast cancer in the presence of a self referral policy. Women living in Florence between 1980 and 1989 who had undergone mammography at a self referral breast clinic were studied. Main outcome measures were the use of mammography in relation to age, symptoms, and the interval between two subsequent tests, and early diagnosis performance indicators were the detection rate (DR), the prevalence/incidence ratio, and the proportion of early detected cancers. Performance indicators were compared with those from formal screening programmes. Florence, Italy. All mammograms performed at the clinic from 1980-89 in 40-69 year old women living in Florence were examined (n = 42,226). Records included the date of birth and of the examination, the reason for testing (asymptomatic/presence of pain/presence of symptoms other than pain), and the TNM classification for breast cancer cases. The total number of mammograms performed per annum increased by 70% over the decade, but much of this was routine repeat mammography (54.1% in 1989). Rates of first examinations in asymptomatic women increased in the second half of the decade from 17 per 1000 in 1985 to 31 per 1000 in 1989. Mammographic coverage decreased with increasing age from 12.6% in 40-49 year olds to 6.0% in 60-69 years old. Performance indicators of the activity in asymptomatic women were comparable with those expected in service screening. The proportion of not advanced cancers detected in asymptomatic women was 62.3% with a DR of 5.3 per 1000, and the average prevalence/incidence ratio was 2.9. High quality mammography performed in a breast clinic in self referred asymptomatic women can achieve as good results as a formal invitation screening service. Only a few of these women will benefit, but those who do are likely to be younger (40-49 year old women).

Repeat Mammography Among Women Over 50 Years of Age

Mammography decreases mortality among women 50 years of age and older. Although recent surveys show that mammography use has increased since 1983, it continues to be underused by women at risk for breast cancer. The frequency of repeat screening at recommended intervals remains an important unanswered question. This record audit study included all visits from 1986 to 1988 for active female patients, 51-64 years of age, in a family medicine practice. The practice has a disproportionately black patient population, many of whom are on public assistance, characteristics associated with lower compliance with cancer screening guidelines. I reviewed medical records for a physician’s recommendation for mammography and also for a radiology report documenting receipt of the mammogram. I also abstracted from the medical record the reason for mammography, a history of breast cancer risk factors, and sociodemographic information. In addition, I noted documentation of a clinical breast examination (CBE) and CBE results. Records for 150 patients were included in the analysis. The results indicate that repeat screening mammography is not common: 3% had three mammograms during the study period; 19% had two; 33% had one; and 44% had none. Physician recommendation for first-time mammography and clinical examination occurred with low frequency. As others report, mammography use is strongly associated with physician recommendation for a mammogram.

Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening

This study identified barriers and facilitators of repeat participation in mammography and breast physical examination among women ages 50 years and over. Telephone interviews were conducted with 910 women in this age group. Forty percent of respondents had never had a mammogram. Only 38% had had one in the past 12 months. Of women who had a prior mammogram, 43% had had only one. Only 60% of women had had a breast exam in the past 12 months. A physician recommendation was the single best predictor of adherence to mammography. However, only 60% of women reported that their physicians had ever recommended mammography. Several other barriers to mammography were revealed, including anxiety, embarrassment, and concerns about cost and radiation. Both a family history of breast cancer and heightened perceived vulnerability to breast cancer were associated positively with repeat mammography participation; anxiety about screening reduced the likelihood of this outcome. These findings suggest that physicians can play a powerful role in motivating women to participate in initial and subsequent breast cancer screening. Reassurance may reduce women's anxiety and embarrassment and increase utilization further.

Automated management of screening and diagnostic mammography.

We designed an automated system for managing large-scale screening and diagnostic mammography. The system collects coded mammographic findings from the radiologist and records a history directly from the patient. This information is stored in an integrated clinical data base to which the results of subsequent examinations or surgery are added. In addition, the system generates letters to the patient and her physician that describe mammographic findings and letters reminding them of routine screening visits. For patients who have positive results on examinations, it checks for records of biopsy or repeat mammography and generates follow-up letters if appropriate intervention is not found. While this system is part of a comprehensive computerized hospital information system, mammography management tools with most of the features described can be designed for relatively inexpensive microcomputers.

Changes in Wolfe mammographic patterns with aging.

Mammograms of 212 women were examined at a mean interval of 15 (range 11-17) years, to determine whether there was any change in Wolfe mammographic pattern with age. The mean age of the patients at repeat mammography was 52 (range 32-75) years. The DY pattern tended to change to P2 or P1 with age. Those in whom the DY pattern remained tended to be younger (mean age 47 years) than those who changed to P2 (57 years), or P1 (55 years). Women whose pattern changed from DY to N1 had a mean age of 42 years. These findings support the hypothesis that the perilobular connective-tissue elements are the structures responsible for the dense appearance of the DY breast, as these elements would be most active between 15 and 45 years (peak reproductive period) and tend to regress later.