Repeat Head Computed Tomography Research Articles

Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Anticoagulated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: Still Warranted

Anticoagulation agents are proven risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of our study is to describe the epidemiology of prehospital coumadin, aspirin, and Plavix (CAP) patients with ICH and evaluate the use of repeat head computed tomography (CT) in this group. We performed a retrospective study from our trauma registry. All patients with intracranial hemorrhage on initial CT with prehospital CAP therapy were included. Demographics, CT scan findings, number of repeat CT scans, progressive findings, and neurosurgical intervention were abstracted. A comparison between prehospital CAP and no-CAP patients was done using χ(2) and Mann-Whitney U test. A total of 1606 patients with blunt TBI charts were reviewed of whom 508 patients had intracranial bleeding on initial CT scan and 72 were on prehospital CAP therapy. CAP patients were older (P < 0.001), had higher Injury Severity Score and head Abbreviated Injury Scores on admission (P < 0.001), were more likely to present with an abnormal neurologic examination (P = 0.004), and had higher hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay (P < 0.005). Eighty-four per cent of patients were on antiplatelet therapy and 27 per cent were on warfarin. The CAP patients have a threefold increase in the rate of worsening repeat head CT (26 vs 9%, P < 0.05). Prehospital CAP therapy is high risk for progression of bleeding on repeat head CT. Routine repeat head CT remains an important component in this patient population and can provide useful information.

Routine Repeat Head CT for Children with Traumatic Brain Injury Is Unwarranted

To evaluate efficacy of repeat head computed tomography (CT) in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), investigators retrospectively

Low-dose aspirin therapy is not a reason for repeating head computed tomographic scans in traumatic brain injury: a prospective study

BackgroundMost studies have categorized all antiplatelet drugs into one category. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) and outcomes in patients on low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) therapy. MethodsPatients with traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage on initial head computed tomography (CT) were prospectively enrolled. Patients on prehospital low-dose (81 mg) aspirin therapy were matched with patients exclusive of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy using propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Injury Severity Score, and neurological examination. Outcome measures were progression on RHCT and subsequent neurosurgical intervention. ResultsA total of 144 patients who had intracranial hemorrhage on initial CT scan (ASA group: 72; No-ASA group: 72) were enrolled. The mean age was 72.8 ± 11.7 years, 59.7% were male, and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 (2–3). There was no difference in progression on RHCT (25% in ASA versus 16.6% in no-ASA), change in management as a result of RHCT (1.4% versus 1.4%), RHCT as a result of neurological decline (0 versus 1.4%), discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (15 [14–15] versus 15 [14–15]), and mortality (0 versus 1.4%) between the two groups. ConclusionsLow-dose aspirin therapy is not associated with progression of initial insult on RHCT or clinical deterioration. Prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy as a sole criterion should not warrant a routine repeat head CT in traumatic brain injury.

Repeat head computed tomography after minimal brain injury identifies the need for craniotomy in the absence of neurologic change

In this era of cost containment, the value of routine repeat head computed tomography (CT) in patients with mild TBI (mTBI) and no interval neurologic change has been challenged. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that routine repeat head CT provides critical information after mTBI even with no neurologic change. From January 1996 to May 2010, records from all patients admitted to our Level I trauma center with an arrival Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15 and at least one head CT were retrospectively reviewed. In 360 patients with mTBI and positive initial head CT finding, the most common abnormalities were subarachnoid hemorrhage (64%), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (57%), and subdural hemorrhage (40%). Scans were repeated in 8 ± 6 hours; 11% were recalled, 59% remained stable, but 30% showed injury progression. Those patients with worsening repeat head CT finding had higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), were more likely to be intubated and require craniotomy, had longer stay, and had higher mortality (all p < 0.001). On multiple logistic regression, altered GCS score (odds ratio, 3.1-4.0), ISS (odds ratio, 1.1), and presence of mass effect (odds ratio, 2.0) were independently associated with worsening repeat head CT finding. In patients receiving a neurosurgical operative intervention, 32% to 59% had no clinical decline before the worsening repeat CT finding. After mTBI, worsening of repeat head CT finding is seen in a third of patients and is associated with worse outcomes. A substantial fraction of patients who require operative intervention will have no clinical changes in the first 8 hours, supporting the value of repeat head CT within this time frame. Care management study, level III.

Is Repeat Head Computed Tomography Necessary in Children Admitted with Mild Head Injury and Normal Neurological Exam?

Background: Children admitted following mild head injury (MHI) often undergo repeat head computed tomography (HCT) to identify progression of injury, although there is little evidence to support this practice. Methods: From January 2007 to December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged 2 months to 18 years admitted with a diagnosis of MHI to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center. Data including Glasgow Coma Scale, loss of consciousness, length of stay (LOS), and number and results of HCTs were analyzed. Results: A total of 507 patients were admitted with MHI and normal neurological exam; 389 had a normal and 118 had an abnormal initial HCT. The median LOS in the normal HCT group was 17.68 h (5.47-109.68) and in the abnormal HCT group 36.63 h (10.15-192.40). The median number of HCTs in the normal HCT group was 1 (1-2) and in the abnormal HCT group 2 (1-5). Conclusions: Children admitted with MHI, abnormal initial HCT and normal neurological exam had longer LOS and more HCTs compared with children with normal initial HCTs. No patient in either group had any change in their management based on HCT. Therefore, repeat HCT may be unnecessary for patients with MHI and normal neurological exam.

Declining trend in the use of repeat computed tomography for trauma patients admitted to a level I trauma center for traffic-related injuries

ObjectiveTo evaluate the trend in utilization of repeat (i.e. ≥2) computed tomography (CT) and to compare utilization patterns across body regions for trauma patients admitted to a level I trauma center for traffic-related injuries (TRI). Materials and MethodsWe linked the Harborview Medical Center trauma registry (1996–2010) to the billing department data. We extracted the following variables: type and frequency of CTs performed, age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance status, injury mechanism and severity, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and final disposition. TRIs were defined as motor vehicle collisions, motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian-related injuries. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between utilization of different body region repeat (i.e. ≥2) CTs and year of admission, adjusting for patient and injury-related characteristics that could influence utilization patterns. ResultsA total of 28,431 patients were admitted for TRIs over the study period and 9499 (33%) received repeat CTs. From 1996 to 2010, the proportion of patients receiving repeat CTs decreased by 33%. Relative to 2000 and adjusting for other covariates, patients with TRIs admitted in 2010 had significantly lower odds of undergoing repeat head (OR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.49–0.76), pelvis (OR=0.37; 95% CI: 0.27–0.52), cervical spine (OR=0.23; 95% CI: 0.12–0.43), and maxillofacial CTs (OR=0.24; 95% CI: 0.10–0.57). However, they had higher odds of receiving repeat thoracic CTs (OR=1.86; 95% CI: 1.02–3.38). ConclusionA significant decrease in the utilization of repeat CTs was observed in trauma patients presenting with traffic-related injuries over a 15-year period.

Diagnostic Dilemma of a Young Man With Fever and Headaches

A 23-year-old man was admitted to the hospital in the fall because of fever and headache. He had been well until 5 days earlier when he developed headaches associated with photophobia, neck pain, nausea, and vomiting. He had no significant medical history and took no medications. He lived with his parents in Seattle, Washington, and took classes at a local college. He had immigrated from China in 2007. The patient was alert and interactive. The temperature was 40.0°C, blood pressure was 161/92 mm Hg, pulse was 91 beats/min, and oxygen saturation was 100% on room air. His general examination revealed anicteric sclerae and no skin rash. Pain was noted with passive neck flexion. On neurologic examination, the patient was oriented with fluent speech and no dysarthria. Visual fields and extraocular movements were full. The remaining cranial nerve functions were intact. Muscle bulk and strength were normal. Sensation was preserved with no extinction detected. The tendon reflexes were equal at 2+, and plantar responses were flexor. There was no dysmetria on finger-to-nose testing. The gait was normal. Laboratory studies including a basic metabolic panel, liver function tests, coagulation studies, and urinalysis were notable only for a low sodium of 135 mEq/L (ref 136-145 mEq/L) and an elevated white blood cell count of 13 000/μL (ref 4.30-10.00 thousand/μL). Blood cultures were obtained. Chest radiograph revealed clear lungs and pleural spaces. Computed tomography (CT) of the head showed no abnormalities. The results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis Dexamethasone, vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and acyclovir were started for possible bacterial or viral meningitis but discontinued once the blood cultures, CSF Gram stain and bacterial cultures, and viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were negative. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was normal. The patient was discharged home after 3 days with a diagnosis of viral meningitis. Five days after initial discharge, the patient returned to the hospital with lethargy and confusion. His mother reported that he was less responsive, intermittently mumbling in response to questions, and requiring assistance with basic daily functions. The patient was drowsy and disoriented. The temperature was 38.2°C, blood pressure 119/90 mm Hg, and pulse 116 beats/minute. On examination, he exhibited neck stiffness, incoherent speech, and impaired comprehension. Serum sodium was 121 mEq/L and white blood cell count was 15 500/μL. Head CT showed mild dilatation of the third and lateral ventricles compared to the study 5 days before. Contrast-enhanced brain MRI demonstrated abnormal enhancement of the prepontine and interpeduncular cisterns (see Figure 1). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test was negative. Repeat CSF analysis is shown in Table 1. Figure 1. Magnetic resonance scans of the brain. A, T1 fat-saturation postcontrast axial magnetic resonance image on initial presentation shows normal contrast enhancement. B, T1 postcontrast axial image 5 days later shows mild enhancement of the interpeduncular ... Antibiotics and antiviral medications were restarted. On hospital day 2, the patient had a witnessed convulsive seizure. Repeat head CT showed worsening hydrocephalus. An external ventricular drain was placed, and the patient was given a loading dose of phenytoin. The patient’s mother reported that the patient may have been exposed to an uncle with active pulmonary tuberculosis, leading to the initiation of antituberculous medications, including rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Three days after readmission, a presumptive mold grew in the CSF bacterial cultures. A rash was also noted on the patient’s right flank, consisting of plaques and papules with a central pearly pink color. A skin punch biopsy and additional laboratory studies were obtained, including antinuclear antibody (negative), rheumatoid factor (<13 IU/mL; negative), aspergillus galactomannan assay (0.114; negative), and Quantiferon-TB Gold (indeterminate). Upon further questioning, the patient’s mother reported the patient had spent 8 months in California 1½ years before. Liposomal amphotericin B was started. Six days after readmission, the results of 2 diagnostic tests were received.

Utility of Repeat Head Computed Tomography in Patients With an Abnormal Neurologic Examination After Minimal Head Injury

Previous studies proposed that repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) is of no value in patients with a minimal head injury (MHI) and normal neurologic examination (NE). The goal of our study was to investigate the value of RHCT in patients with MHI with an abnormal NE. A retrospective chart review of adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center from July 2002 to December 2006 with MHI was performed. Demographics, injury severity, and HCT findings were collected. Patients with an abnormal NE at the time of RHCT were divided into three subgroups: acute deterioration NE (AD-NE), persistently abnormal NE (PA-NE), and unknown NE (U-NE). Changes in the management and outcomes after RHCT were compared. One hundred seven patients had a MHI with an abnormal NE. Of those, seven (6.5%) had a change in management after RHCT. At the time of RHCT, 68 patients (63%) had a PA-NE, 21 AD-NE, and 18 U-NE. Six patients (29%) with AD-NE, 1 patient (6%) with an U-NE, and no patients with PA-NE required changes in management after RHCT. Compared with a RHCT, NE had higher positive and negative predictive values in determining the need for management changes. Of all patients with MHI with an abnormal NE at the time of RHCT, 63% had a PA-NE. Although a RHCT is beneficial to patients with an acutely deteriorating or U-NE, it appears to be of little value in patients with a PA-NE. Compared with RHCT, serial NE may be a stronger predictor for the need for intervention in patients with MHI.

Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage After Blunt Trauma: Are Patients on Preinjury Anticoagulants and Prescription Antiplatelet Agents at Risk?

Trauma centers are more frequently evaluating patients who are receiving anticoagulant or prescription antiplatelet (ACAP) therapy at the time of injury. Because there are reports of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after blunt trauma in this patient group, we evaluated patients receiving ACAP with a head computed tomography (CT) on admission (CT1) followed by a routine repeat head CT (CT2) in 6 hours. We hypothesized that among patients with no traumatic findings on CT1 and a normal or unchanged interval neurologic examination, the incidence of clinically significant delayed ICH would be zero. We retrospectively reviewed adult blunt trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center from January 2006 to August 2009 who were receiving preinjury ACAP therapy. We reviewed medications, mechanism of injury, head CT results, and outcomes. Demographic data, injury severity scores, international normalized ratio, and neurologic examinations were recorded. We determined the incidence of delayed ICH on CT2 for patients with a negative CT1. Five hundred patients qualified for the protocol. Of these, 424 patients (85%) had a negative CT1. Among these patients, mean age was 75 years; 210 (50%) were male. Fall from standing was the most common mechanism of injury found in 357 patients (84%). Warfarin alone was taken in 68%, clopidogrel alone in 24%, and other agents in 2%. Six percent of patients were taking two agents. Mean international normalized ratio for patients on warfarin was 2.5. Among patients with a negative CT1, CT2 was obtained in 362 patients (85%) and was negative in 358 patients (99%). Four patients (1%) with a negative CT1 had a positive (n = 3) or equivocal (n = 1) CT2. All the changes on CT2 were minor and had either resolved or stabilized on third head CT. Of the four patients with positive or equivocal CT2, none had a change in neurologic examination; however, two had symptoms that could be attributed to head injury. Three were discharged home and one died of cardiac disease unrelated to head trauma. The incidence of delayed ICH in our study was 1%. However, none of the delayed findings were clinically significant. Among patients on ACAP therapy with a negative CT1 and a normal or unchanged neurologic examination, a routine CT2 is unnecessary. We recommend a period of observation to recognize those patients with symptoms that could be due to delayed ICH.

A management algorithm for cerebrospinal fluid leak associated with anterior skull base fractures: detailed clinical and radiological follow-up

Detailed outcome data for the management of anterior skull base fractures associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is lacking. We present detailed follow-up data of a single-center study using a predetermined algorithm for the management of CSF leakage secondary to traumatic fractures. A number of 138 consecutive patients were included in the analysis; all patients underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning at time of admission with β(2)-transferrin testing used to confirm CSF leakage. Patients with acute surgical indications were operated as emergent; leaks were repaired at the time of initial surgery in patients with intracranial pressure < 15cm H(2)O. The remainder of the study population was managed conservatively including use of prophylactic antibiotics; lumbar drainage (LD) catheters were placed in those patients with leakage persisting beyond 48h. Leaks lasting longer than 5days underwent microsurgical repair using an intradural bicoronal approach. One-year follow-up assessment included evaluation of neurological status, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and repeat head CT. Twenty eight patients (26.9%) underwent emergent surgery, 15 of whom had simultaneous CSF leak repair, whereas 76 patients (73.1%) underwent delayed CSF leak repair between days 5 and 14. Postoperative meningitis rate was low (1.9%). Postoperative CSF leak (1.9%) was managed by intradural or transnasal endoscopic operation. Comparable rates of anosmia and frontal lobe hypodensities were seen in the surgical and conservatively managed subgroups. The presented algorithm, utilizing prophylactic antibiotics, trial of LD, acute and/or delayed intradural microsurgery, yields favorable outcomes. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to better define the role of prophylactic antibiotics and to better characterize the optimal timing and approach of surgical repair.

Secondary Intracranial Hemorrhage After Mild Head Injury in Patients With Low-Dose Acetylsalicylate Acid Prophylaxis

Low-dose acetylsalicylate acid (LDA) therapy is accepted as a major risk factor for intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) in head injuries. Coincidentally, patient admissions that might be indicated for in hospital observation of neurologic function causes increased health care costs. In the literature, there is no evidence concerning the incidence of secondary intracranial hemorrhagic events (SIHE) in patients with LDA prophylaxis that had negative primary computed tomography (CT)-scan of the head. In this prospective study, we enrolled 100 consecutive trauma patients older than 65 years presenting in a Level I urban trauma center after a mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15) who had LDA prophylaxis. Patients included had a negative primary head CT-scan concerning ICH. For analysis of the incidence of SIHEs patients had routine repeat head CT (RRHCT) after 12 hours to 24 hours. Sixty-one patients were women and 39 men. Mean age was 81 years +/- 10 years. Injury mechanism was a level fall in 84 cases and others in 16. In four patients (4%) an SIHE was detected in the RRHCT (p < 0.00001). In two patients (2%) major secondary ICH had occurred without neurologic deterioration at the time of RRHCT with fatal outcome in one patient and neurosurgical intervention in another. The remaining two patients (2%) had minor SIHE with an uneventful clinical course. The incidence of SIHE has been neglected until now. The current study revealed that patients with LDA prophylaxis after mild head injury with negative primary head CT should be subjected to RRHCT within 12 hours to 24 hours to accurately identify SIHE. Alternatively to RRHCT, patients should be subjected to a prolonged in-hospital observation for at least 48 hours.

Necessity of Repeat Head CT and ICU Monitoring in Patients With Minimal Brain Injury

Recent publications have dismissed the need for routine repeat computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with minimal brain injury (MBI) (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13-15 with positive initial CT) unless physical examination changes. In an attempt to better allocate scarce resources, we hypothesized that not only was repeat head CT unnecessary but also routine intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring of these patients with MBI and stable examinations were unnecessary. All blunt injured patients admitted to a level I trauma center from January 2005 through December 2007 who met our criteria for MBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 14-15 with positive initial CT) were reviewed. All patients had ICU monitoring and repeat CT done (at 12-24 hours) regardless of clinical examination. Patients with skull fractures, facial fractures needing urgent repair, those requiring immediate neurosurgical intervention and those with other injuries requiring ICU monitoring were excluded. Data including demographics, initial brain injury, follow-up CT scan results, changes in clinical examination, neurosurgical interventions, and ICU days were recorded. Two hundred seven patients met criteria. Fifty-eight patients (28%) developed worsening findings on follow-up CT or examination. Eighteen required invasive neurosurgical intervention (6 intracranial pressure [ICP] monitors, 12 craniotomies) and 1 died (stroke). Those requiring ICP monitors had worsening intracranial hemorrhages (IPHs) with clinical examination changes or examination changes only, whereas those requiring craniotomy had worsening subarachnoid hemorrhage (2 patient), epidural hematoma (1 patient), and subdural hematoma (8 patients). Five of the subdural hematoma patients remained asymptomatic before craniotomy. ICU days were significantly increased in those patients with worsening CT findings who did not require neurosurgical intervention compared with those patients with unchanged or improved CT scans (5 days vs. 2.7 days, p < or = 0002). Routine follow-up CT scans are beneficial in those patients with MBI and may lead to higher levels of medical management or neurosurgical intervention in patients with worsening CT findings. These patients should be kept in an ICU setting until head CT has stabilized. With these dissimilar results from previous studies, a prospectively randomized multicentered trial would be beneficial.

Value of Repeat Cranial Computed Tomography in Pediatric Patients Sustaining Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Repeat head computed tomography (CT) is standard practice for traumatic brain injury (TBI) at many centers. The few studies available in children remain unclear over the value of repeat CT within 24 hours to 48 hours of lesion in such patients. The purpose of the present study was to assess the value of repeat cranial CT in children presenting moderate or severe TBI. A retrospective study performed within a pediatric intensive care unit between January 2000 and December 2006. All patients with moderate and severe TBI who survived the first 24 hours after admission were included. Clinical data collected included age, lesion mechanism, time between first and second CTs, disease severity score at admission, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) both at admission and day of repeat CT. A total of 63 children were assessed whose mean age was 72 months (48-112). The time between the first and the second CT scans averaged 25.78 hours +/- 13.75 hours (range, 6-48 hours). The reasons for ordering repeat CT scans were divided as follows: follow-up (78%), neurologic deterioration (20.4%), and increased intracranial pressure (1.6%). The change on the follow-up CT scan was compared with the GCS score. The GCS score was improved in 66.6% of patients, remained the same in 15.9%, and worsened in 17.5%. The appearance on the CT scans was better, the same or worse in 41.3%, 34.9%, and 23.8% of patients, respectively. There was a significant association between GCS and changes in findings on repeat CT (OR = 34.5, confidence interval [5.98-199.04], p = 0.000009). The positive and negative predictive values were 82% and 89%, respectively. One patient with a worsened GCS required surgical intervention based on the repeat CT scan. An unchanged or improving neurologic examination in children sustaining moderate or severe TBI who are appropriately monitored may be adequate to exclude the possibility of neurosurgical intervention and, hence, repeat head CT scan.

Indications for Routine Repeat Head Computed Tomography (CT) Stratified by Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury

Controversy exists as to the role of a routine repeat head computed tomography (CT) for patients with traumatic brain injury and an initially abnormal head CT. The specific aim of this study is to identify patients with head injuries who would benefit from a routine repeat head CT. This was a 2-year (2003 and 2004) prospective study of all patients with blunt trauma admitted to an urban, Level I trauma center that presented with an abnormal head CT. Results of initial head CT and indications for repeat head CT (routine vs. neurologic change) were recorded. Interventions were both medical (diuresis, hyperventilation, barbiturates) and surgical (intracranial pressure monitor placement or craniotomy). Patients were categorized by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score as having mild (GCS 13-15), moderate (GCS 9-12), or severe (GCS < or = 8) head injury. There were 354 patients admitted with an initially abnormal head CT. The 37 (10%) patients who went directly to craniotomy and the 43 (12%) patients who died within 24 hours of admission were excluded from analysis. The remaining 274 patients (44 years old, 70% male, mean injury severity score = 19, mean GCS = 10) are the focus of this analysis. After admission, 163 patients underwent a total of 241 repeat CT scans. Of the repeat scans obtained, 102 scans (43%) were unchanged, 54 scans (22%) were better, and 85 scans (35%) were worse. Neurologic deterioration prompted 45 repeat scans (19%), and 196 repeat scans (81%) were obtained routinely after admission without change in neurologic status. The 45 CT scans obtained for neurologic change led to medical or surgical intervention in 38% (n = 17) of cases, whereas scans obtained led to an intervention in only two patients (1%). Both patients who underwent an intervention after a routine scan had a GCS score < or =8 at admission and at the time of routine repeat head CT. One patient had an intracranial pressure monitor placed and the other was taken for craniotomy. No patient with a mild or moderate traumatic brain injury underwent an intervention after a routine repeat head CT. Patients with any head injury (mild, moderate, or severe) should undergo a repeat head CT after neurologic deterioration, because it leads to intervention in over one-third of patients. Routine repeat head CT is indicated for patients with a GCS score < or =8, as results might lead to intervention without neurologic change.

Utility of Repeat Head Computed Tomography After Blunt Head Trauma: A Systematic Review

Repeat head computed tomography (CT) is standard practice for head-injured patients at many trauma centers. Utilization of CT has increased over time, yet effects on outcome and associated risks are unknown. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the incidence of progression of injury on repeat CT and resulting treatment changes. Studies were included from Medline, Embase, and a hand search of citations in reviewed articles. Main outcome measures were progression of injury on repeat CT and resulting intervention. Data were abstracted from 30 eligible studies and discrepancies were settled by consensus. Progression of injury on repeat CT was evident in 8 to 67% of patients in the included studies. Neurosurgical intervention resulting subsequent to a repeat CT occurred in 0 to 54% of patients. More severe traumatic brain injury, defined by Glasgow Coma Scale, was associated with a higher proportion of patients with progression of injury on CT and subsequent neurosurgical interventions. Risk factors associated with progression of injury on CT or resulting intervention were inconsistently reported, but coagulopathy and injury severity were most commonly reported. Few studies reported changes in nonsurgical management, in-hospital disposition, or adverse events associated with obtaining repeat CTs. Indications for repeat head CT after traumatic brain injury are unclear. The wide range of reported injury progression on CT and resulting surgical and medical treatment changes suggest there may be a subset of patients who benefit from repeat CT. Further research should stratify by severity of traumatic brain injury, clearly define inclusion and exclusion criteria, address selection bias, quantify progression of injury on CT, determine factors predictive of injury progression and intervention, and assess risks associated with repeat CT.

Routine Repeat Head CT for Minimal Head Injury is Unnecessary

Patients with MHI and a positive head computed tomography (CT) scan frequently have a routine repeat head CT (RRHCT) to identify possible evolution of the head injury requiring intervention. RRHCT is ordered based on the premise that significant injury progression may take place in the absence of clinical deterioration. In a Level I urban trauma center with a policy of RRHCT, we reviewed the records of 692 consecutive trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15 and a head CT (October 2004 through October 2005). The need for medical or surgical neurologic intervention after RRHCT was recorded. Patients with a worse and unchanged RRHCT were compared, and independent predictors of a worse RRHCT were identified by stepwise logistic regression. There were 179 patients with MHI and RRHCT ordered. Of them, 37 (21%) showed signs of injury evolution on RRHCT and 7 (4%) required intervention. All 7 had clinical deterioration preceding RRHCT. In no patient without clinical deterioration did RRHCT prompt a change in management. A Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15 (13 or 14), age higher than 65 years, multiple traumatic lesions found on first head CT, and interval shorter than 90 minutes from arrival to first head CT predicted independently a worse RRHCT. RRHCT is unnecessary in patients with MHI. Clinical examination identifies accurately the few who will show significant evolution and require intervention.

Is Repeated Head Computed Tomography Necessary for Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage?

This study was performed to determine the need for repeat head computed tomography (CT) in patients with blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who were initially treated nonoperatively and to determine which factors predicted observation failure or success. A total of 1,462 patients were admitted to our level II trauma center for treatment of head injury. Seventeen per cent (255/1,462) were diagnosed with ICH on initial head CT. Craniotomy was initially performed in 15.7 per cent (40/255) of patients with ICH. Two hundred sixteen patients with ICH were initially observed. Ninety-seven per cent (179/184) of observed patients with ICH and repeat head CT never underwent a craniotomy, 2.7 per cent (5/184) of patients with ICH initially observed underwent craniotomy after repeat head CT, and four patients (80%) had deteriorating neurologic status. Multivariate analysis revealed the following significant admission risk factors were associated with a need for repeat head CT indicating the need for craniotomy: treatment with anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet medications, elevated prothrombin time (PT), and age greater than 70 years. In patients with blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage initially observed, there is little utility of repeated head CT in the absence of deteriorating neurologic status. The only admission risk factors for a repeat CT indicating the need for craniotomy were advanced age and coagulopathy.

Does Routine Serial Computed Tomography of the Head Influence Management of Traumatic Brain Injury? A Prospective Evaluation

Computed tomography (CT) of the head is the current standard for diagnosing intracranial pathology following blunt head trauma. It is common practice to repeat the head CT to evaluate any progression of injury. Recent retrospective reviews have challenged the need for serial head CT after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study intends to prospectively examine the value of routine serial head CT after TBI. Consecutive adult blunt trauma patients with an abnormal head CT admitted to an urban, Level I trauma center from January 2003 to September 2003 were prospectively studied. Variables collected included: initial head CT results, indication for repeat head CT (routine versus neurologic change), number and results of repeat head CT scans, and clinical interventions following repeat head CT. Over the 9-month period, there were 128 patients admitted with an abnormal head CT after sustaining blunt trauma. The 16 patients who died within 24 hours and the 12 patients who went directly to craniotomy were excluded. The remaining 100 patients make up the study population. Abnormal head CT findings were subarachnoid hemorrhage (47%), intraparenchymal hemorrhage (37%), subdural hematoma (28%), contusion (14%), epidural hematoma (11%), intraventricular hemorrhage (3%), and diffuse axonal injury (2%). Overall, 32 patients (32%) had only the admission head CT, while 68 patients (68%) underwent 90 repeat CT scans. Of the repeat head CT scans, 81 (90%) were performed on a routine basis without neurologic change. The remaining 9 (10%) were performed for a change in Glasgow Coma Scale (n = 5), change in intracranial pressure (n = 1), change in Glasgow Coma Scale and intracranial pressure (n = 1), change in pupil size (n = 1), or sudden appearance of a headache (n = 1). Three patients had their care altered after repeat head CT: two underwent craniotomy and one was started on barbiturate therapy. All three patients had their repeat head CT after neurologic change (decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale in 2 and increase in intracranial pressure in 1). Serial head CT is common after TBI. Most repeat head CT scans are performed on a routine basis without neurologic change. Few patients with TBI have their management altered after repeat head CT, and these patients have neurologic deterioration before the repeat head CT. The use of routine serial head CT in patients without neurologic deterioration is not supported by the findings of this study.

Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia