Repeat Atrial Fibrillation Research Articles

Temporal Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in the Elderly: Incidence of MACE and Recurrence Rates.

The elderly population with atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing. There is limited evidence to suggest AF ablation as an effective treatment for the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the temporal trends of first-time ablations in the elderly, the impact of age on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and a composite endpoint of AF-related hospitalizations, repeat AF ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Utilizing the Danish administrative registers, we incorporated individuals undergoing their first-time AF ablation from 2001 to 2020. Our cohort was divided into 3 age groups (<60, 60-74, and≥75 years) and scrutinized across 4 consecutive 5-year intervals. Cox proportional-hazard multivariable analyses and cumulative incidences were used to evaluate the endpoints of 5-year MACE incidence and a 1-year composite endpoint of AF-related hospitalizations, repeat AF ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Elderly patients who underwent AF ablation increased significantly, from none in 2001 to 9% in 2020. The 5-year incidence of MACE in the elderly decreased from 61.9% (95%CI: 41.1%-82.7%) to 38.1% (95%CI: 31.9%-44.2%). The HR for age≥75 years in the last time period was 1.52 (95%CI: 1.26-1.83). The 1-year composite outcome varied from 35.6% to 52.0%; age was not a consistent predictor. AF ablation use in the elderly has significantly increased over time. A notable decrease in MACE was evident across all age cohorts, with a particularly pronounced trend observed among the elderly population. Age was not an independent predictor of the composite endpoint.

Significant reduction of complications applying an optimized vascular access and post-interventional groin-site management during electrophysiology procedures

Abstract Background Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is an established treatment strategy. However, the optimal femoral vascular access strategy and post-interventional management in the electrophysiology (EP) setting is still under debate. Purpose To assess the impact of ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral vascular puncture and of a modified post-interventional groin-site management strategy on complication rates. Method Patients undergoing EP procedures at the our university heart and vascular center are included in an institutional prospective registry. Conventional vascular access as well as post-interventional groin site pressure-bandage and bed rest of 6 hours (group I) was compared to a new strategy including ultrasound-guided vascular access, venous closure by a Z-suture and groin site pressure-bandage for only 2 hours plus additional 4 hours bed rest (group II). Incidences of minor and major groin site complications for both groups were compared. Hematoma, bleeding, arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery without need for intervention (e.g. transfusion, thrombin injection, surgery) were classified as minor complications. Complications requiring intervention or retroperitoneal hematoma were defined as major complications. Results A total of 1535 procedures in 1381 patients (779 (51 %) procedures in 705 (51%) patients in group I and 756 (49%) procedures in 676 (49%) patients in group II) were analyzed. In group I and group II, respectively, 39%/44% procedures were index pulmonary vein isolations, 30%/29% repeat atrial fibrillation, 16 %/15% supraventricular tachycardia, 12%/11% PVC or VT ablations, and 4%/2% left atrial appendage occlusions. The total groin site complication rate was 9% (70/779 procedures) for group I, and 5% (38/756 procedures) for group II (OR 0.54 [95%-CI 0.35-0.82], p=0.003). Major groin site complications occurred in 2% (19/779 procedures) in group I and were reduced to 1% (10/756 procedures) in group II (OR 0.53 [95%-CI 0.22-1.22], p=0.156). Conclusion The overall groin site complication rate in EP-procedures was significantly reduced by implementing a novel institutional standard for vascular access management including ultrasound-guided puncture and a modified post-interventional groin site management.

Advanced mapping and ablation technologies to target pulmonary veins gaps and residual antral potentials during repeat paroxysmal AF ablation: acute and long-term follow-up

Abstract Background A comprehensive understanding of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and residual potentials (RAP) within the antral scar during repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, facilitated by advanced mapping and ablation technologies, is currently lacking. Optimizing radiofrequency (RF) deliveries after failed PV isolation (PVI) may enhance ablation efficiency. Purpose This study aims to assess both the acute and long-term outcomes focusing on PV gaps (PVGs) and RAPs, utilizing advanced mapping and ablation technologies during repeat PV ablation in patients (pts) with paroxysmal AF. Methods Repeat AF-CHARISMA study, a prospective, single-arm cohort study, included consecutive pts from 13 centers undergoing repeat ablation of paroxysmal AF. The Lumipoint (Boston Scientific) map-analysis tool was used sequentially on each PV component. All patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after the procedure. The ablation endpoint was PVI and electrical quiescence in the antral region. Long-term outcome was the recurrence of AT/AF over follow-up. Results One-hundred pts were included (69% after failed RF procedure, 31% after failed cryoablation procedure). A total of 276 PVGs (192 after RF ablation, 2.8±1.8/pt; 84 after cryoablation, 2.7±1.9/pt, p=0.665 vs RF) and 44 RAPs (43 after RF ablation, 0.6±1.1/pt; 1 after cryoablation, 0.03±0.2/pt, p=0.002 vs RF) were detected. In the majority of cases (75%), only PVGs were present whereas, in 21%, both PVGs and RAPs were detected (2 pts had only RAPs). In 2 pts no PVG nor RAP were identified. PVGs were most common at anterior sites (103, 37.3%), followed by posterior sites (75, 27.2%) and carina sites (49, 17.8%). PVG location sites did not differ between prior ablation approach. Only 1 pt after cryoablation showed a RAP (at carina site), whereas the 44 RAPs after RF were fairly distributed across different sites. Acute procedural success was 100%, with all PVs successfully isolated and RAPs completely abolished in all study pts. After the blanking period, over a follow-up of 480±211 days, 18 pts (18%) suffered an AT/AF recurrence (time to recurrence: 245±80 days). Previous ablation approach (HR=0.66, 95%CI: 0.2 to 2.0 for previous cryoablation, p=0.46), number of PVGs (1.05, 0.8 to 1.3, p=0.67) or number of RAPs (0.41, 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.12) were not associated to AT/AF recurrence. No major complications or adverse events occurred. Conclusion A structured ablation workflow for repeat catheter ablation, incorporating consistent high-density mapping and improved diagnostic tools to guide the procedure, demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating paroxysmal AF irrespectively of previous ablation approach. Residual potentials within the antral scar were more frequently detected after RF ablation compared to cryoablation.

A multi-center retrospective cohort analysis of age and racial disparities in patients undergoing repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, and its prevalence has been increasing worldwide. Current data shows that AF is more common in white males compared to blacks despite blacks having multiple cardiovascular comorbidities. There is paucity of data showing the recurrence of AF re-ablation after index ablation specifically as it pertains to race, gender, and age. We sought to explore the rates of recurrent AF re-ablation in this retrospective cohort analysis. Methods Using a multi-center database, we examined 23,558 encounters and 10,530 had readmission records i.e. readmitted within 3 years. The encounters included adults (18+) who had an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation between 1/1/2018-06/30/2020. We used binary logistic regression models and Tukey-Kramer procedure to analyze pairwise comparisons among different subgroups of race, sex, and age group. The primary endpoint was recurrence of repeat ablation. Secondary endpoints included non-fatal stroke and myocardial infarction. Results Our sample size was 23,558 patients, 20,276 were white patients (86%) and 3,282 were non-white patients (14%). The average age was 66.29 years (SD 10.43) and average age at the time of repeat ablation was 65.97 years. The average BMI was 21.55. Out of the 23,558 patients, 14.30% (N= 3368) had re-ablation within 3 years of the index ablation. The odds ratio of re-ablation for patients in their 50s is 1.4229 (95% CI [1.1172, 1.8122]) compared to patients in their 80s. Similarly, the odds ratio is 1.4330 (95% CI [1.1466, 1.7909]) for the 60-69 group, 1.3075 (95%CI [1.0458, 1.6346]) for the 70-79 group and 1.3443 (95% CI [1.0088, 1.7914]) for patients below 50 compared to over 80 group. The LR for re-ablation was 0.8438 (p=0.3583) in females. The incidence of non-fatal stroke and MI were 0.27% (N= 63) and 0.19% (N= 45). Average length of time to re-ablation was 415.5 days. Discussion When controlling for age group and sex, race was not significantly associated with an increased likelihood of repeat ablation. When controlling for race and age group, sex was not significantly associated with an increased likelihood of repeat ablation. When controlling for race only, females were not at a higher risk of re-ablation. However, when controlling for race and sex, patients in their 50s are 42.3% more likely to have re-ablation when compared to patients in their 80s. In contrast, the age of patients at their first ablation increased, there appeared to be a rising trend indicating a higher chance of AF recurrence within 3 years when controlling for race and sex. Conclusion The incidence of repeat AF ablation is not higher in racial minorities when compared to whites. Interestingly, there appears to be an decreasing rate of AF re-ablation in older patients despite a higher rate of AF recurrence as age increases possibly owing to more conservative therapeutic approach such as medical management.

Atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation in the era of conduction system pacing.

Despite key advances in catheter-based treatments, the management of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a therapeutic challenge in a significant subset of patients. While success rates have improved with repeat AF ablation procedures and the concurrent use of antiarrhythmic drugs, the likelihood of maintaining sinus rhythm during long-term follow-up is still limited. Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) has returned as a valuable treatment option given the recent developments in cardiac pacing. With the advent of conduction system pacing, AVNA has seen a revival where pacing-induced cardiomyopathy after AVNA is felt to be overcome. This review will discuss the role of permanent pacemaker implantation and AVNA for AF management in this new era of conduction system pacing. Specifically, this review will discuss the haemodynamic consequences of AF and the mechanisms through which 'pace-and-ablate therapy' enhances outcomes, analyse historical and more recent literature across various pacing methods, and work to identify patient groups that may benefit from earlier implementation of this approach.

Pulmonary vein reconnection and repeat ablation characteristics following cryoballoon-compared to radiofrequency-based pulmonary vein isolation.

Despite advances in efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PVI remains common. PV-reconnection is the main finding during repeat PVI procedures performed to treat recurrent AF. To analyze pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns during repeat ablation procedures in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing radio frequency or cryoballoon-based PVI. Retrospective analysis of PV-reconnection patterns and analysis of re-ablation strategies in consecutive index RF- and CB-based PVI and their respective re-ablation procedures during concomitant usage of both energy sources at a single high-volume center in Germany. A total of 610 first (06/2015-10/2022) and 133 s (01/2016-11/2022) repeat ablation procedures after 363 (60%) RF- and 247 (40%) CB-based index PVIs between 01/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed. PV-reconnection was found in 509/610 (83%) patients at first and 74/133 (56%) patients at second repeat procedure. 465 of 968 (48%) initially via CB isolated PVs were reconnected at first re-ablation but 796 of 1422 initially RF-isolated PV (56%) were reconnected (OR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62-0.86]; p < .001). This was driven by fewer reconnections of the left PVs (LSPV: OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.42-0.86]; p = .005 and LSPV: 0.67 [0.47-0.95]; p = .026). PV-reconnection was more likely after longer, RF-based index PVI and in older females. Repeat procedures were shorter after CB-compared to after RF-PVI. Reconnection remains the most common reason for repeat AF ablation procedures after PVI. Our data suggest to preferentially use of the cryoballoon during index PVI, especially in older women.

The Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on the Risk of Repeat Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with increased incidence/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of GERD and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on outcomes of AF catheter ablation remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between the presence of GERD and risk of repeat AF ablation, stratified by PPI therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF undergoing initial ablation in January 2011-September 2015. GERD was defined by endoscopic findings, objective reflux testing, or clinical symptoms. The association between GERD/PPI use and time to repeat ablation was evaluated by time-to-event analysis with censoring at the last clinic follow-up within 1 year. Three hundred eighty-one subjects were included. Patients with GERD (n = 80) had a higher 1-year repeat ablation rate compared with those with no GERD (25% vs 11.3%, P = 0.0034). Stratifying by PPI use, patients with untreated GERD (37.5%) more likely needed repeat ablation compared with reflux-free (11.3%, P = 0.0003) and treated GERD (16.7%, P = 0.035) subjects. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, GERD was an independent risk factor of repeat ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 3.30, confidence interval [CI] 1.79-6.08, P = 0.0001). Specifically, untreated GERD was associated with earlier repeat ablation compared with no GERD (HR 4.02, CI 1.62-12.05, P = 0.0013). However, no significant difference in repeat ablation risk was noted between reflux-free and PPI-treated GERD groups. GERD was an independent predictor for risk of repeat AF ablation within 1 year, even after controlling for major cardiovascular comorbidities and confounders. PPI therapy modulated this risk, as repeat ablation-free survival for PPI-treated GERD was noninferior to reflux-free patients.

Feasibility and efficacy of single-shot PFA technology for redo procedures after a previous atrial fibrillation ablation procedure

Abstract Introduction Despite significant technological advancements and a better understanding of atrial tachyarrhythmia pathophysiology, a non-negligible percentage of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation experiences arrhythmia relapse. Repeat procedures have been traditionally performed via thermal energy systems, which carry a certain risk of collateral damage to adjacent tissues. Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) has emerged as an alternative non-thermal energy source for cardiac ablation. The main advantage is its selectivity to cardiac tissue. FarapulseTM is the first PFA technology to have received regulatory approval and includes a pentaspline PFA catheter. Although designed for pulmonary vein isolation, its use for extrapulmonary vein site ablation has been previously documented. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the pentaspline FarawaveTM for redo procedures. Methods Patients referred for a redo procedure using FarapulseTM system were enrolled in 3 high-volume European centers. A workflow (Figure 1.A) was established based on rhythm at presentation (Group 1: sinus rhythm; Group 2: AFL; Group 3: AF). Results A total of 117 patients were included (64 in Group 1, 18 in Group 2, and 35 in Group 3). The mean number of previous procedures was 1.26, and 23 patients (19.66%) had already undergone ≥2 procedures. Previous ablation targets included PVI, either alone (46.15%) or in combination with other targets, including posterior mitral line (39.32%), posterior wall (6.84%), or anterior mitral line (2.56%). Electroanatomical mapping (EAM) was adopted in 15.38% of the cases. Specifically, in 27.78% (n=5) of group 2, 15.63% (n=10) of group 1 and 8.57% (n= 3) of group 3 cases. Additional focal radiofrequency ablation was required in 4 patients for CTI line ablation. Lesion sets are depicted in Figure 2. Mean procedural and LA dwelling time were 95.2 ± 38.0 and 50.7 ± 36.7 minutes, respectively. There was a total of one major complication (intracranial haemorrhage) and 5 minor complications (two vascular site related, and three reversible ST segment changes, related to applications on the mitral annulus area). A total of 100 patients completed at least 3 months of follow-up (FU), with a median FU time was 7.55 months (IQR 5.18 – 11.85). The total number of recurrences was 20, including 2 during the blanking period. Survival function (excluding blanking period) was 88.6 (95% CI 79.7 – 93.8) at 6 months and 80.0% (95% CI 67.3 – 88.3) 12 months. Atrial arrhythmia free-survival was higher in patients presenting in sinus rhythm, compared to the other two groups (p = 0.0135), as displayed in Figure 1.B. Conclusion The proposed stepwise approach to repeat AF ablation procedures based on the use of the single-shot PFA system (with or without EAM) was feasible, safe, fast and effective at one year follow-up.Flow chart and Kaplan Meier curveLesion sets

Multicenter retrospective evaluation of a patient-tailored electrogram-based ablation strategy using an artificial intelligence software in repeat atrial fibrillation ablation procedures

Abstract Background While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the gold standard approach of treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), the optimal strategy in case of AF recurrences for redo patients is not well established. Several studies described the usefulness of ablating in atrial regions exhibiting abnormal electrograms, i.e. spatio-temporal dispersion, during AF and an artificial intelligence (AI) electrograms (EGMs)-based software solution has been developed and validated to obtain real-time adjudications of multipolar electrograms in de novo patients. Purpose This study sought to evaluate the novel AI-EGMs-based software approach for redo-AF ablation procedures. Methods This study was a retrospective, multicentric, nonrandomized study. Patients with recurrent symptomatic AF were enrolled in 7 European centers. Redo ablation procedures were performed using the AI software and acute and long-term outcomes after ablation were evaluated. Results A total of 117 patients with refractory symptomatic AF admitted for redo procedure were included with 30% paroxysmal, 42% short-standing persistent and 28% long-standing persistent AF at the time of the redo procedure. During the index procedures, a previous PVI ablation was performed in all patients while additional ablation such as lines and EGM-based ablation was performed in 64 patients (55%). Out of 117 patients, 30 (26%) presented with structural heart disease, 61 (52%) with hypertension, 31 (26%) with a BMI &amp;gt;30, 16 (14%) a sleep apnea syndrome and 24 (20%) had an antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the procedure. The average AF history was 6.54 ± 4.15 years with an average sustained duration equal to 25 ± 62 months. AI-EGMs-based AF ablation was performed in all patients and easily integrated in the physicians’ workflow during redo procedures. AF termination, i.e. AF regularization or sinus rhythm conversion, occurred in 82/117 patients (71%) with sinus rhythm conversion by ablation in 79/117 patients (68%). After a mean follow-up of 11 ± 5 months, 81% of patients were free from documented AF, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) after one redo procedure and 60% of patients were free from any documented atrial arrhythmia, with or without AADs, after one redo procedure per patient. Furthermore, we observed that 77%, 84% and 82% of patients were free from documented AF with or without AADs in paroxysmal, short-standing and long-standing persistent AF patients respectively, and that 71%, 59% and 49% of patients were free from any documented atrial arrhythmia with or without AADs in paroxysmal, short-standing and long-standing persistent AF patients respectively. Conclusions This retrospective study reports that patient-tailored spatiotemporal dispersion ablation is a relevant and standardized approach for repeat AF ablation. This was obtained with an AI-EGMs-based software solution, which may be added to the operative workflow of redo AF procedures.

A multicenter evaluation of repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with isolated pulmonary veins: a Netherlands Heart Registration study

Abstract Background Of the 25-50% atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation patients who undergo repeat ablation, approximately 15-30% have all pulmonary veins (PVs) isolated at the repeat procedure. Currently, there is limited evidence and a lack of consensus on the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with isolated PVs. Purpose Our aim was to characterize and compare the effectiveness of repeat AF ablation strategies to reduce AF recurrences in patients with isolated PVs using a real-world multicenter registry. Methods All AF patients referred for repeat AF ablation with all PVs isolated at 8 hospitals in the Netherlands were included (Netherlands Heart Registration; 2016-2019). Medical record reviews were conducted for all patients referred for repeat AF ablation to determine study eligibility, the presence of PV reconnection, ablation strategy used, and the outcome of AF recurrence. Patients referred for repeat AF ablation, with PVI only conducted during previous ablations, and all PVs isolated were eligible. Effectiveness of repeat AF ablation strategies were assessed with multivariable Cox models comparing individual ablation strategies, number of ablation strategies performed, and presence of persistent AF. Results Of 2,311 repeat AF ablations performed, 274 (11.9%) were eligible and had all PVs isolated (Figure 1). Patients with isolated PVs were a median age of 66 (IQR 58-70) years, 44.2% were women, 45.6% had persistent or long-standing persistent AF, and the median CHA2DS2-Vasc score was 2 (IQR 1-3). Ablation was not performed in 33 (12.0%) patients with isolated PVs (Figure 2a). A single ablation strategy was performed most often (41.2%; Figure 2a). Posterior box ablation was the most frequent (58.4%) ablation strategy performed, followed by antralization of the PVs (26.3%). Over a median follow-up of 2.0 (1.0-3.3) years, 147 (59.8%) patients with isolated PVs had an AF recurrence &amp;gt;3 months after repeat ablation and 30 (12.7%) patients had another repeat AF ablation within 1 year of repeat procedure. After multivariable adjustment, no difference in AF recurrences was detected between ablation strategies [p&amp;gt;0.05 for all; Figure 2b]. Further, there was no difference detected in AF recurrences for the number of ablation strategies performed (Figure 2c), the individual ablation strategy conducted, and persistent AF (p&amp;gt;0.05 for all). Among patients with isolated PVs, patients with larger left atrial size had a higher risk of AF recurrences [adjusted HR 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.05)]. Conclusion Among the 2,311 repeat AF ablations performed, 11.9% had all PVs isolated. Despite multiple ablation strategies performed for isolated PVs, 59.8% of patients had an AF recurrence over follow-up and no difference in the incidence of AF recurrences was detected between repeat ablation strategies. Further evidence is warranted to determine an effective treatment strategy to reduce AF recurrences in AF patients with isolated PVs.

Integrating clinical variables with magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping parameters to predict response to first-time and repeat atrial fibrillation ablation procedures

Abstract Background The heterogeneity in patient response to atrial fibrillation ablation mandates the development of methods to predict clinical outcomes. Several clinical risk scores exist to prognosticate patients post ablation. Magnetic resonance imaging can quantify anatomical and functional atrial properties, whilst electroanatomic mapping data provides unparalleled atrial substrate characterisation. These data could be leveraged to predict ablation outcomes more accurately. Purpose To incorporate magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping parameters with clinical variables to predict response to 1) first-time and 2) repeat atrial fibrillation ablation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 123 consecutive patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation ablation including pre-procedural atrial magnetic resonance imaging was performed. Data were split into training (n=68) and test (n=55) cohorts depending on data availability for clinical risk score calculation. The APPLE, DR-FLASH, FLAME, HATCH, HATCH+OSA, CHA2Ds2VASc and CAAP-AF scores were calculated for patients in the training cohort. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with arrhythmia recurrence which were then combined into a multivariate logistic regression model. Area under the curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) analysis was used to compare the ability of clinical risk scores and the combined model to predict arrhythmia recurrence risk after one procedure. The model's ability to predict repeat ablation response was tested in 38 patients who underwent redo procedures. The ROC optimal cut-off score was used to divide patients into two groups (high and low arrhythmia recurrence risk) for time-to-event analysis. Results In univariate analysis, weight, age, hypertension, left atrial ejection fraction and mean left atrial bipolar voltage were associated with arrhythmia recurrence after one procedure. The multivariate logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.7491 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6269-0.8712) in the training cohort and 0.7457 (95% CI 0.6137-0.8778) in the test cohort for predicting arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months (Figure 1A). Amongst clinical risk prediction tools, CAAP-AF had the highest predictive value (AUC 0.6529, 95% CI 0.5265-0.7793) (Figure 1B). In patients undergoing repeat ablations, the combined model had an AUC of 0.7585 (95% CI 0.5989-0.9182) for predicting arrhythmia recurrence (Figure 2A). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence in the ‘high recurrence risk’ group at 12 months (log-rank p=0.029) (Figure 2B). Conclusion A logistic regression model integrating clinical, anatomical, functional, and electrophysiological parameters improved the accuracy of atrial fibrillation ablation outcome prediction compared to existing clinical risk scores. The model may be used to predict response to repeat procedures offering the potential to improve the patient selection process.

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation

BackgroundRelationship between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use prior to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and subsequent AF recurrence is not well-understood. ObjectivesThis study investigated the effects of GLP-1 RA use within 1 year before ablation and its association with AF recurrence and associated outcomes. MethodsThe TriNetX research database was used to identify patients aged ≥18 years undergoing AF ablation (2014-2023). Patients were categorized into 2 groups, and propensity score matching (1:1) between preablation GLP-1 RA users and nonusers was performed based on demographics, comorbidities, body mass index, laboratory tests, AF subtype, and medications. Primary outcome was composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug therapy, or repeat AF ablation after a 3-month blanking period following the index ablation. Additional outcomes included ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality during 12-month follow-up period. ResultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching, the study cohort comprised 1,625 GLP-1 RA users and 1,625 matched GLP-1 RA nonusers. Preablation GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with a lower risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and repeat AF ablation after the index procedure (HR: 1.04 [95% CI: 0.92-1.19]; log-rank P = 0.51). Furthermore, the risk of ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality during the 12-month follow-up period did not differ between the 2 groups. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that preprocedural use of GLP-1 RAs is not associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence or associated adverse outcomes following ablation, and underscore the need for future research to determine whether these agents improve outcome in AF patients.

Rates of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation and its impact on outcomes among females and males.

Several studies have demonstrated that females have a higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on sex-based differences in PV reconnection rates at repeat ablation. We aimed to investigate sex-based differences in electrophysiological findings and atrial arrhythmia recurrence after repeat AF ablation METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 161 consecutive patients (32% female, age 65±10 years) who underwent repeat AF ablation after index PV isolation between 2010 and 2022. Demographics, procedural characteristics and follow-up data were collected. Recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF was defined as any atrial arrhythmia ≥30 s in duration. Compared to males, females tended to be older and had a significantly higher prevalence of prior valve surgery (10vs. 2%; P=.03). At repeat ablation, PV reconnection was found in 119 (74%) patients. Males were more likely to have PV reconnection at repeat ablation compared to females (81vs. 59%; P=.004). Excluding repeat PV isolation, there were no significant differences in adjunctive ablation strategies performed at repeat ablation between females and males. During follow-up, there were no significant differences in freedom from AT/AF recurrence between females and males after repeat ablation (63vs. 59% at 2 years, respectively; P=.48). After initial PV isolation, significantly fewer females have evidence of PV reconnection at the time of repeat ablation for recurrent AF. Despite this difference, long-term freedom from AT/AF was similar between females and males after repeat ablation.

Does radiofrequency ablation procedural data improve the accuracy of identifying atrial fibrillation recurrence?

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the CARTO 3D mapping system is a common approach for pulmonary vein isolation to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Linkage between CARTO procedural data and patients' electronical health records (EHR) provides an opportunity to identify the ablation-related parameters that would predict AF recurrence. The objective of this study is to assess the incremental accuracy of RFA procedural data to predict post-ablation AF recurrence using machine learning model. Procedural data generated during RFA procedure were downloaded from CARTONET and linked to deidentified Mercy Health EHR data. Data were divided into train (70%) and test (30%) data for model development and validation. Automate machine learning (AutoML) was used to predict 1 year AF recurrence, defined as a composite of repeat ablation, electrical cardioversion, and AF hospitalization. At first, AutoML model only included Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics. Second, an AutoML model with procedural variables and demographical/clinical variables was developed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to compare model performances using test data. Among 306 patients, 67 (21.9%) patients experienced 1-year AF recurrence. AUROC increased from 0.66 to 0.78 after adding procedural data in the AutoML model based on test data. For patients with AF recurrence, NRI was 32% for model with procedural data. Nine of 10 important predictive features were CARTO procedural data. From CARTO procedural data, patients with lower contact force in right inferior site, long ablation duration, and low number of left inferior and right roof lesions had a higher risk of AF recurrence. Patients with persistent AF were more likely to have AF recurrence. The machine learning model with procedural data better predicted 1-year AF recurrence than the model without procedural data. The model could be used for identification of patients with high risk of AF recurrence post ablation.

Lower Recurrence Rates of Atrial Fibrillation and MACE Events After Early Compared to Late Ablation: A Danish Nationwide Register Study.

Guidelines recommend prioritizing treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs before referral of patients with atrial fibrillation to ablation, delaying a potential subsequent ablation. However, delaying ablation may affect ablation outcomes. We sought to investigate the impact of duration from diagnosis to ablation on the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence and adverse events. Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients with first-time ablation for atrial fibrillation were identified and included from 2010 to 2018. Patients were divided into 4 groups by diagnosis-to-ablation time: <1.0 year (early ablation), 1.0 to 1.9 years, 2.0 to 2.9 years, and >2.9 years (late ablation). The primary end point was atrial fibrillation recurrence after the 90-day blanking period, defined by admission for atrial fibrillation, cardioversions, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, or repeat atrial fibrillation ablations. The secondary end point was a composite end point of heart failure, ischemic stroke, or death, and each event individually. The study cohort consisted of 7705 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation recurrence in the 4 groups was 42.9%, 54.8%, 55.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. Hazard ratios were 1.20 (95% CI, 1.07-1.35), 1.29 (95% CI, 1.13-1.47), and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.28-1.53), respectively, with the early ablation group as reference. The hazard ratio for the combined secondary end point was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.04-1.44) in the late ablation group compared with the early ablation group. In patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation, early ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence. Furthermore, the associated risk of heart failure, ischemic stroke, or death was significantly lower in early-compared with late-ablation patients.

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Between Segmental and Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients Undergoing Repeat Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) has supplanted segmental PVI (SPVI) as standard procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is limited evidence examining the efficacy of these strategies in redo ablations. In this study, we investigated the difference in recurrence rates between SPVI and CPVI in redo ablations for PV reconnection.Methods and Results: This study retrospectively enrolled 543 patients who had undergone AF ablation between 2015 and 2017. Among them, 167 patients (30.8%, including 128 male patients and 100 patients with paroxysmal AF) underwent redo ablation for recurrent AF. Excluding 26 patients without PV reconnection, 141 patients [90 patients of SPVI (Group 1) and 51 patients of CPVI (Group 2)] were included. The AF-free survival rates were 53.3% and 56.9% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P=0.700). The atrial flutter (AFL)-free survival rates were 90% and 100% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P=0.036). The ablation time was similar between groups, and there no major complications were observed. For redo AF ablation procedures, SPVI and CPVI showed similar outcomes, except for a higher AFL recurrence rate for SPVI after long-term follow-up (>2 years). This may be due to a higher probability of residual PV gaps causing reentrant AFL.

Abstract 12390: Differences in the Impact of Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheters on Subsequent Rates of Pulmonary Vein Reconnection Detected Between Men and Women During Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Contact force (CF) sensing catheters permit tissue contact monitoring that may lead to durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Objective: To assess the impact of CF-sensing catheters on PV reconnection rates at repeat AF ablation and whether there are sex-based differences. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent repeat AF ablation after index PV isolation between 2010 and 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (non-CF sensing catheters) and Group 2 (CF-sensing catheters). Results: One hundred sixty-one patients were included in the study (76 in Group 1 and 85 in Group 2, 32% female, 70 ± 10 years old). Initial use of CF-sensing catheters at index ablation was associated with a lower PV reconnection rate at repeat ablation (60% for Group 2 vs 87% for Group 1; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in locations of PV reconnection between Group 1 and Group 2. When stratified by sex, there were significantly lower rates of PV reconnection in male patients with use of CF-sensing catheters (92% for Group 1 vs 67% for Group 2; p=0.001) but not for female patients (71% for Group 1 vs 50% for Group 2; p=0.23). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, use of CF-sensing catheters at index ablation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.65; p=0.003) and female sex (aOR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.86; p=0.02) were associated with significantly lower rates of PV reconnection found at repeat ablation. Conclusion: Use of CF sensing catheters reduced PV reconnection rate found at repeat AF ablation. Females have lower rates of PV reconnection identified at repeat ablation which suggest that non-PV triggers may be a more common cause of recurrent AF, thereby blunting the impact of CF-sensing catheters on reducing recurrent AF in females.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). There is limited data regarding the outcomes of AF catheter ablation in HCM patients. In this study, we aimed to synthesize all available evidence on the effectiveness of ablation of AF in patients with HCM compared to those without HCM. We systematically reviewed bibliographic databases to identify studies published through February 2023. We included cohort studies with available quantitative information on rates of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, and repeat ablation procedures after initial AF ablation in patients with vs without HCM. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis models and reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight studies were included in quantitative synthesis (262 HCM and 642 non-HCM patients). During median follow-up 13-54 months across studies, AF recurrence rates ranged from 13.3% to 92.9% in HCM and 7.6% to 58.8% in non-HCM patients. The pooled RR for recurrent atrial arrhythmia after the first AF ablation in HCM patients compared to non-HCM controls was 1.498 (95% CI = 1.305-1.720; P < 0.001). During follow-up, HCM patients more often required AAD therapy (RR = 2.844; 95% CI = 1.713-4.856; P < 0.001) and repeat AF ablation (RR = 1.544; 95% CI = 1.070-2.228; P = 0.02). The pooled RR for recurrent atrial arrhythmias after the last AF ablation was higher in patients with HCM than those without HCM (RR = 1.607; 95% CI = 1.235-2.090; P < 0.001). Compared to non-HCM patients, those with HCM had higher rates of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, AAD use, and need for repeat AF ablation after initial ablation of AF.

PO-01-138 NON-INVASIVE 3-D MAPPING (ECGI) OF MACRO-REENTRANT ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIAS

Peri-valvular atrial arrhythmias are the most common macro-reentrant mechanism seen in both de-novo and repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations. Standard 12-lead ECG’s poorly predict tachycardia mechanisms especially post AF ablation. Identifying the mechanism of tachycardia non-invasively could help in procedural planning, expedite the invasive procedure, and identify critical areas sustaining persistent AF in patients with concomitant AF. The objective was to determine if ECGi could identify the mechanism of atrial flutters in patients with or without prior AF ablations. 30 patients (11 de-novo, 19 prior ablation) underwent non-invasive propagation and phase mapping (CardioInsight, Medtronic, Inc) and intracardiac bi-atrial high-density activation mapping (HD Grid and Precision, Abbott Medical). An 8-segment model (RA lateral, RA anterior, CTI, Septum, LA anterior, LA lateral, CS, LA posterior) was used for directionality in the propagation maps, and a 9-segment model for phase map analysis was used for presence and localization of ‘rotational hinge points’ which can occur with wavefronts moving in different directions within close proximity. The precise tachycardia mechanism (counterclockwise (CCW) or clockwise (CW) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) or mitral isthmus (MI) dependent) was determined by intracardiac activation maps, entrainment, and confirmed with termination by ablation. Directionality in a region was deemed concordant if non-invasive and intracardiac maps matched or was declared discordant/indeterminate. A total of 31 macro-reentrants maps were analyzed: 16 CCW-CTI; 7 CW-CTI; 4 CCW-MI; 4 CW-MI. Regional directional concordance percentages shown in theTable. A total of 30/31 phase maps identified at least one region as a 'rotational hinge point', with 26/31 maps showing paired 'hinge points'. Location of rotations are shown in the Figure. ECGi can be used in macro-reentant atrial arrhythmias to determine directionality of activation with best concordance on the lateral walls of both atria. In our study, 97% of peri-valvular atrial flutters had at least one 'rotational hinge point' with 84% showing them paired representing macro-reentant circuit. Posterior LA wall rotational area was present in all peri-mitral flutters. Additionally, paired 'hinge points' with lateral atrial wall directionality were the best determinants of the macro-reentant mechanism.Tabled 1Directional ConcordanceRA LatRA AntCTISeptumLA AntLA LatCSLA PostCCW-CTI88%69%88%44%44%--50%--CW-CTI71%43%71%43%43%--29%--CCW-MI100%50%--75%75%100%100%50%CW-MI100%60%--40%40%80%80%20% Open table in a new tab

PO-05-171 DOES LEFT ATRIAL DILATION PREDICT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION SEVERITY AND ABLATION EFFECTIVENESS?

Left atrium (LA) geometric changes with advancing chronicity and severity of atrial fibrillation (AF). During catheter ablation for AF, electroanatomical mapping (e.g. with CARTO) of the LA can be used to measure the LA volume and atrial width to heigh ratio to guide ablation procedures. To examine whether LA dilation measured by height-to-width ratio of posterior wall predicts paroxysmal AF vs persistent AF or one-year AF recurrence post ablation. CARTO procedural case files were loaded into CARTONET (a cloud-based artificial intelligence powered system) and linked to deidentified Mercy Health electronic health record (EHR) data among AF patients who underwent the first ablation. Machine learning was used for automatic segmentation of atria. Atrial dilation was calculated by height-to-width ratio, which was used to rank patients into thirds of high (>0.69), medium and low (<0.55) dilation. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics (AF type, BMI, age, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, and CHA2DS2-VASC score) at ablation were included in logistic regression examining the relationship of LA dilation with AF diagnosis at ablation. AF recurrence was measured by repeat ablation, electrical cardioversion, and AF rehospitalization within one-year post-ablation. Among 274 ablated AF patients, 146 (53.2%) patients had persistent AF and 58 (21.2%) experienced AF recurrence within one-year post-ablation. The high LA dilation group was 2.8 times more likely to have persistent AF than the low group (odds ratio (OR): 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-5.67). The high LA dilation group was not associated with AF recurrence (OR: 0.64 95% CI: 0.30-1.35) compared with the low dilation group. Patients with high LA atrial dilation were more likely to have the persistent AF diagnosis. AF dilation may be useful to determine progression/chronicity of AF disease and assist physician to tailor the ablation procedures for AF treatment.