RENAL Nephrometry Score Research Articles

Impact of tumor dissecting technique on trifecta achievement in patients requiring extended warm ischemia during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

To clarify specific factors associated with surgical outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) that require extended warm ischemia time (WIT), which may have a negative impact, but cannot always be avoided. We included 1,182 patients who had RAPN performed between January 2016 and December 2022 from a prospectively generated multi-institutional RAPN database, divided into normal WIT (nWIT) (≤ 20min; 843 patients) and extended WIT (eWIT) (> 20min; 339 patients) groups. Primary outcome measures were WIT and the Surface-Intermediate-Base (SIB) margin score, which contribute to postoperative trifecta achievement. Results were compared between the two groups using logistic regression. Patients in the eWIT group had larger tumors, higher RENAL nephrometry scores, and lower SIB scores than those of the nWIT group. The trifecta achievement rate was significantly different between the two groups (nWIT: 70.1 vs. 49.0%, p < 0.001). In the nWIT group, WIT (coefficient: -0.105 [standard error 0.020], p < 0.001) and SIB score (coefficient: -0.107 [0.053], p = 0.045) were significant predictors of trifecta achievement. In the eWIT group, the SIB score (coefficient - 0.216 [0.082], p = 0.008) was significantly associated with trifecta attainment, whereas WIT only showed a trend toward significance. Limitations included a lack of long-term survival, renal function, and chronic complications data. For patients with eWIT during RAPN, the tumor dissection technique may be more important than WIT in predicting postoperative outcomes. Further prospective studies are required to confirm our results.

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a Predictor of Local Recurrence in Patients Underwent Partial Nephrectomy Alongside the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score.

This study aims to assess the utility of the CONUT (Controlling Nutritional Status) Score and R.E.N.A.L. (Renal Nephrometry Score) Score in predicting tumor recurrence in patients with kidney cancer. Additionally, we investigated which parameters contributed to these scores. In total, 115 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 2015 and August 2023 at a single tertiary center were enrolled. After the exclusion criteria, data from 88 patients were analyzed. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes), smoking status, tumor characteristics, CONUT Scores, and R.E.N.A.L. scores were retrospectively recorded. Statistical analyses were performed, and significant p was p < 0.05. The presence of diabetes and hypertension showed a statistically significant association with tumor recurrence (p = 0.033 and p = 0.003, respectively). A high BMI significantly increased the risk of recurrence (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive relationship between the high tumor stage and positive surgical margins with recurrence (p < 0.001). Patients with high R.E.N.A.L. Scores and high CONUT Scores had a higher risk of recurrence (42.1% and 8.7%, respectively), and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONUT and R.E.N.A.L. scores may be used to predict tumor recurrence after partial nephrectomy. Additionally, diabetes, hypertension, high BMI, and positive surgical margin rate might affect surgical success rate for recurrences. Clinicians should consider all these parameters and coring systems to gather more successful results after partial nephrectomy.

Comparison of renal function between the artery and vein clamp and artery-only clamp in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate- to high-complexity renal masses: A propensity-matched study.

Artery and vein (AV) clamps can control venous bleeding in the surgical field and prevent carbon dioxide embolism, especially when large veins are expected to open. However, whether AV clamps cause more renal damage than artery-only (AO) clamps remains unclear. This study aimed to compare renal function and blood loss in surgeries using AO and AV clamps based on high RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 500 patients who underwent RAPN between March 2016 and December 2021. We performed 1:1 propensity matching for these patients. A total of 340 patients with pathological malignancies who were followed up for at least 12 months were included in this analysis. A total of 291 patients with AO clamping and 49 patients with AV clamping were included. Overall, the AV clamp group had higher total RNSs and larger diameters than the AO clamp group. Propensity score-matched analysis included 37 patients in each clamp group. The median warm ischemia times of the AV and AO clamps were 25 and 22 min, respectively, with no significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the amount of blood loss, rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), or renal function at 1, 3, or 12 months post-RAPN. Compared with the AO clamp, the AV clamp did not have a detrimental impact on blood loss or renal dysfunction. Consequently, AV clamps may be considered for patients presenting with moderate-to-high-complexity RNSs.

Comparing open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy – a single institution report

BackgroundOpen partial nephrectomy (OPN) has previously been considered the gold standard procedure for treatment of T1 localized renal tumors. After introduction of robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) as an alternative method to OPN, OPN was gradually abandoned at our department. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the results of patients treated with either OPN or RAPN for suspected renal carcinoma.MethodsPatients who underwent either open or robotic assisted partial nephrectomy between January 1st 2010 and December 31st 2020 were retrospectively included in the study. Each tumor subjected to surgery was scored preoperatively by the RENAL nephrometry score. Complications within 30 days were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.ResultsA total of 197 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were identified; 75 were subjected to OPN and 122 were treated with RAPN. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age (OPN: 63 years ± 11, RAPN: 62 years ± 10), gender (OPN: 71/29%, RAPN: 67/33%), body mass index (OPN: 28 ± 5, RAPN: 28 ± 5), ASA score (OPN: 2.4 ± 0.6, RAPN: 2.2 ± 0.5), or nephrometry score (OPN: 6.6 ± 1.7, RAPN: 6.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.2). The operative time was significantly shorter in the OPN group (81 min) compared to the RAPN group (144.5 min, p < 0.001). Mean perioperative blood loss was 227 ± 162 ml in the OPN group compared to 189 ± 152 ml in the RAPN group (p = 0.1). Mean length of stay was shorter in the RAPN group (3 days) compared to the OPN group (6, days, p < 0.001). Positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the OPN group (21.6%) compared to the RAPN group (4.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo graded complications between the groups (p = 0.6).ConclusionsThe introduction of RAPN at our department resulted in shorter length of stay and fewer positive surgical margins, without increasing complications.

The evolution of tumor enucleation partial nephrectomy: A comparison of perioperative outcomes for sutureless hemostatic bandage as an alternative to standard renorrhaphy.

The standard approach to hemostasis during partial nephrectomy (PN) is to perform suture renorrhaphy (SR). Application of a hemostatic bandage (HB) is an alternative to minimize blood loss and devitalized renal parenchyma. We aim to evaluate perioperative outcomes of PN with tumor enucleation (TE) comparing SR to HB. We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 195 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic PN with TE performed at a tertiary referral center (2012-2022). Hemostasis was obtained with SR in 54 patients while 141 patients underwent application of HB consisting of Surgicel®, Gelfoam® soaked in thrombin, and Floseal®. SR patients had tumors of greater complexity by RENAL nephrometry score compared to HB patients (p < 0.001). Operative time (141 vs. 183 min, p < 0.001), warm ischemia time (11.6 vs. 24.2 min, p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (37 vs. 214 mL, p < 0.001), and length of stay (1.2 vs. 1.8 days, p < 0.001) favored HB. There was no significant difference in Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications (p = 0.22). Renal function was comparable with mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of 0.66 and 0.54 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 3 months postoperatively for HB and SR, respectively (p = 0.93). Application of an HB is a safe alternative to SR for hemostasis following PN with TE in appropriately selected patients.

External validation of the ability of the mRENAL nephrometry score to identify patients at risk for major adverse events or local tumor recurrence after percutaneous renal cryoablation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the mRENAL score to identify patients at risk of either major adverse events (AEs) and/or local tumor recurrence (LR) after percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in an external patient population. Patient demographic data were recorded. The RENAL and mRENAL nephrometry scores were calculated. Clinical outcomes such as AEs, LR, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. AEs were classified according to SIR criteria. Continuous variables and categorical variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with major AEs or LR. The study included 207 patients (Males: n = 117 (56.5%)) with a mean age of 65.8 (± 11.2) years (range:27-90). Overall, the mean tumor diameter, RENAL score, and mean mRENAL score were 30.1mm (± 11.4), 6.3 (± 1.7), and 6.8 (± 1.9), respectively. 14 patients (6.8%) and 13 patients (6.3%) experienced a major AE or LR after PCA, respectively. CSS and OS were 98.6% and 90.3%, respectively. For patients with major AEs after PCA, the mean tumor diameter (p < 0.0001), mean RENAL score (p = 0.03), and mean mRENAL score (p = 0.009) were all higher than those for patients without a major AE. Multi-variate regression analysis showed that only mean tumor diameter (p = 0.005) was predictive of a major AE. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with LR and patients without LR after PCA with regards to tumor size (p = 0.07), mean RENAL score (p = 0.32), or mean mRENAL score (p = 0.07). Multi-variate regression analysis showed that only mean tumor diameter (p = 0.01) was predictive of LR. The mRENAL score did not accurately identify patients at risk for either major AEs or LR. Maximum tumor diameter alone was predictive of both major AEs and LR, and should be the primary focus during patient selection.

The effect of 11th rib excision on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for upper pole renal tumors

IntroductionWe aimed to evaluate the effect of eleven11th rib resection.on the perioperative period TRIFECTA criteria in patients who underwent retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (PN) with the diagnosis of upper pole kidney tumors.Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of the patients who underwent Open PN for upper pole renal masses between 2018 and 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: PN with rib resection and PN without rib resection. The demographic characteristics, tumor sizes, PADUA scores, warm–cold renal ischemia times, mass excision and tumor bed suturing times, histopathological tumor type and surgical margin positivity of the patients were examined. Both groups were evaluated comparatively based on this data.ResultsThe renal nephrometry scores of the two groups were similar. The total renal ischemia time was significantly shorter in the patients who underwent a rib resection than in those who did not (p < 0.001). Both the tumor excision and tumor bed suturing times were significantly shorter in the group that underwent a rib resection than in the group that did not (p < 0.001). The Clavien–Dindo complication grades were statistically similar between the two groups.ConclusionComplex in nature and high–risk renal masses located in the upper pole of the kidney, partial nephrectomy performed with an 11th rib resection can be considered a reliable surgical option with a shorter ischemia time, supporting the preservation of long-term renal function.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Endophytic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PurposeEndophytic renal cancer treatment is a challenge. Due to difficulties in endophytic tumor visualization during surgical extirpation, image-guided percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is an attractive alternative. The minimally invasive nature of PCA makes it favorable for comorbid patients as well as patients in which surgery is contraindicated. Oncological outcomes and complications after PCA of endophytic biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed in this study.Materials and MethodsPatients were included after a multidisciplinary team conference from January 2015 to November 2021. Inclusion criteria were endophytic biopsy-proven T1 RCC treated with PCA with one year of follow-up. Complications were reported according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification system and the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) system. Major complications were defined as a grade ≥ 3 according to the CDC.ResultsFifty-six patients were included with a total of 56 endophytic tumors treated during 61 PCA sessions. The median RENAL nephrometry score was 9 (IQR 2), and the mean tumor size was 25.7 mm (SD ± 8.9 mm). Mean hospitalization time was 0.39 (SD ± 1.1) days. At a mean follow-up of 996 days (SD ± 559), 86% of tumors were recurrence free after one PCA. No patients progressed to metastatic disease. According to the CIRSE classification, 10.7% (n = 6) had grade 3 complications, and 5.4% (n = 3) had CDC major complications.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that PCA of endophytic biopsy-proven T1 RCC is safe with few major complications and excellent local tumor control rates at almost three-year mean follow-up.Level of Evidence 3Retrospective cohort study.Graphic

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided renal biopsy shows high safety and diagnostic yield: a tertiary cancer center experience.

To evaluate the technical success and outcomes of renal biopsies performed under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a closed-bore, 1.5-Tesla MRI unit. We retrospectively reviewed our institutional biopsy database and included 150 consecutive MRI-guided biopsies for renal masses between November 2007 and March 2020. We recorded age, sex, BMI, tumor characteristics, RENAL nephrometry score, MRI scan sequence, biopsy technique, complications, diagnostic yield, pathologic outcome, and follow-up imaging. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between different parameters and the development of complications. McNemar's test was used to assess the association between paired diagnostic yield measurements for fine-needle aspiration and core samples. A total of 150 biopsies for 150 lesions were performed in 150 patients. The median tumor size was 2.7 cm. The median BMI was 28.3. The lesions were solid, partially necrotic/cystic, and predominantly cystic in 137, eight, and five patients, respectively. Image guidance using fat saturation steady-state free precession sequence was recorded in 95% of the biopsy procedures. Samples were obtained using both fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and cores in 99 patients (66%), cores only in 40 (26%), and FNA only in three (2%). Tissue sampling was diagnostic in 144 (96%) lesions. No major complication developed following any of the biopsy procedures. The median follow-up imaging duration was 8 years and none of the patients developed biopsy-related long-term complication or tumor seeding. MRI-guided renal biopsy is safe and effective, with high diagnostic yield and no major complications. Image-guided renal biopsy is safe and effective, and should be included in the management algorithm of patients with renal masses. Core biopsy is recommended. • MRI-guided biopsy is a safe and effective technique for sampling of renal lesions. • MRI-guided biopsy has high diagnostic yield with no major complications. • Percutaneous image-guided biopsy plays a key role in the management of patients with renal masses.

The preoperative predictive factors for pathological T3a upstaging and positive surgical margin of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma

ObjectivesThe objective of this study is predict positive surgical margin (PSM) and pathological T3a (pT3a) upstaging in patients with clinical T1 (cT1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and methods159 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) for RCC. Patients’ demographic, laboratory, radiological and pathological data that could predict PSM and pT3a upstaging pre-operatively were evaluated. The categorical and continuous variables were compared between the patient groups with or without PSM and/or pT3a upstaging using Pearson’s chi-square test, and independent samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. ResultsPT3a upstaging was detected in 32 (20.1%) patients, and PSM was detected in 28 (17.6%) patients. PT3a upstaging was detected in 27 and 5 patients who underwent open surgery and laparoscopic surgery, respectively (P < .001). In addition, pT3a upstaging was detected in 6 and 26 patients who underwent RN and PN, respectively (P < .001). Peritumoral fatty tissue thickness was 11.97 and 15.38 in the pT1 and pT3a patient groups, respectively (P = .022). In patients with pT3a upstaging, tumor size was larger, and renal nephrometry score and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were higher (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .022, respectively). It was determined that De Ritis ratio (DRR) and albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ratio (AAPR) parameters had significant prognostic values in predicting PSM (P = .024, and P = .001, respectively). ROC analysis indicated that tumor size predicted pT3a upstaging with 100% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity when its cut-off value was taken as 6.85 mm (AUC: 1.000, P < .001). In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed AAPR and DRR as significant predictors of PSM (P < .001, and P = .009, repsectively). ConclusionThe findings of this study indicated that the surgical technique of choice and the type of operation, tumor size, RNS value, peritumoral fatty tissue thickness, HU values of peritumoral and tumor side fatty tissues, and DRR and SII values can predict pT3a upstaging of patients with cT1 RCC, and that AAPR and DRR values can predict PSM.

Robotic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for anterior renal mass nephron-sparing surgery.

Robotic nephron-sparing surgery is traditionally performed via a transperitoneal (TP) approach. However, the retroperitoneal (RP) approach has gained popularity, particularly for posterolateral renal masses. The RP approach is associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and shorter length of stay, while preserving oncologic outcomes in selected masses. Here, we aim to assess the feasibility of the RP approach in excising anterior renal masses. Patients ≥ 18years of age who underwent robotic nephron-sparing surgery for anterior renal masses were retrospectively identified (2008-2022). Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative data were collected and characterized based on TP vs RP approaches. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson's Chi-squared test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Two hundred and sixteen patients were included-178 (82.4%) underwent TP approach and 38 (17.6%) underwent RP approach. Baseline demographics, preoperative tumor size, and renal nephrometry scores were similar. The RP approach was associated with shorter operative (150 vs 203min, p < 0.001) and warm ischemia time (12 vs 21min, p < 0.001), and less blood loss (20 vs 100cc, p = 0.002) (Table1). The RP approach was associated with shorter length of stay (1 vs 2days, p < 0.001) and less total complications (5.3% vs 19.1%, p = 0.038). Major complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade > 3) rates were similar. There was no difference in positive surgical margin rates or pathologic characteristics. Robotic RP approach for nephron-sparing surgery is feasible for eligible anterior tumors and is associated with favorable perioperative outcomes with preserved negative surgical margin rates. Table1 Patient baseline demographics Overall Transperitoneal Retroperitoneal p value Median/N IQR/% Median/N IQR/% Median/N IQR/% N 216 178 82.4% 38 17.6% Age (years) 60.5 (52.1-67.7) 60.4 (52.8-67.7) 61.6 (49.1-69.2) 0.393 Sex Male 126 58.3% 100 56.2% 26 68.4% Female 90 41.7% 78 43.8% 12 31.6% 0.165 Race White 162 75.0% 137 77.0% 25 65.8% Asian 4 1.9% 2 1.1% 2 5.3% Black 21 9.7% 18 10.1% 3 7.9% Hispanic 26 12.0% 18 10.1% 8 21.1% Other 2 0.9% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0.197 Body mass index (kg/m2) < 25 32 14.8% 25 14.0% 7 18.4% 25-30 68 31.5% 55 30.9% 13 34.2% 30-35 60 27.8% 50 28.1% 10 26.3% 35 + 56 25.9% 48 27.0% 8 21.1% 0.808 Prior abdominal surgery Yes 118 54.6% 104 58.4% 14 36.8% No 98 45.4% 74 41.6% 24 63.2% 0.015 Prior kidney surgery Yes 10 4.6% 9 5.1% 1 2.6% No 206 95.4% 169 94.9% 37 97.4% 0.518 Chronic kidney disease stage ≥ 3 Yes 45 20.8% 38 21.3% 7 18.4% No 171 79.2% 140 78.7% 31 81.6% 0.687 Charlson comorbidity index 0 138 63.9% 116 65.2% 22 57.9% 1 46 21.3% 38 21.4% 8 21.1% 2 19 8.8% 13 7.3% 6 15.8% ≥ 3 13 6.0% 11 6.2% 2 5.3% 0.412 Tumor size (cm) 2.7 (2-3.6) 2.8 (2-3.5) 2.55 (2-3.7) 0.796 Tumor laterality Left 100 46.3% 78 43.8% 22 57.9% Right 116 53.7% 100 56.2% 16 42.1% 0.114 Clinical T stage cT1a 186 86.1% 152 85.4% 34 89.5% cT1b 30 13.9% 26 14.6% 4 10.5% 0.509 RENAL Nephrometry score Low (4 to 6) 94 43.5% 76 42.7% 18 47.4% Intermediate (7 to 9) 112 51.9% 94 52.8% 18 47.4% High (≥ 10) 19 4.6% 8 4.5% 2 5.3% 0.829 TE tumor enucleation, SPN standard margin partial nephrectomy, IQR interquartile range.

Risk of pseudoaneurysm and bleeding complications after partial nephrectomy: comparison of tumor enucleation to standard margin technique.

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard for the resection of amenable small renal masses. Some surgeons have adopted tumor enucleation (TE) over the standard margin PN (SPN) technique based on preservation of healthy renal parenchyma by following the tumor pseudocapsule. However, TE may also confer additional advantages due to avoidance of sharp incision including reduction in perioperative and bleeding complications. Therefore, we evaluated the rate of pseudoaneurysms and other complications following TE vs. SPN. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PN (TE and SPN) between 2008 and 2020 was conducted. Baseline characteristics were compared between the TE and SPN cohorts with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 534 patients were included, 195 (36.5%) receiving TE and 339 (63.5%) SPN. There were no differences in baseline patient demographics. There was no difference in RENAL nephrometry scores between the two groups (p=0.47). TE had lower rates of postoperative complications (11.3 vs. 21.5%, p=0.002). TE had less bleeding complications (2.1 vs. 8.0%, p=0.002) with no pseudoaneurysm events following TE compared to 12 following SPN (0.0 vs. 3.5%, p=0.008). Need for interventional radiology largely reflected pseudoaneurysm differences (0 (0.0%) TE vs. 13 (3.8%) SPN, p=0.006. Readmission occurred less often after TE vs. SPN (4.1 vs. 8.3%, p=0.07). Patients receiving TE experienced no clinically significant pseudoaneurysm formation and were less likely to have any bleeding complication or major complication postoperatively. TE may be preferred when minimizing morbidity aligns with patient selection and preferences.

Safety and Technical Feasibility of Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation of Central Tumors without Pyeloperfusion

PurposeTo assess the safety and technical success of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) without pyeloperfusion in 94 patients with central renal tumors. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of all central renal tumors treated by PCA without pyeloperfusion was performed. Central tumors were defined as those involving the renal sinus fat on preprocedural cross-sectional imaging. Patient demographics and baseline tumor characteristics were recorded. The details of the PCA procedure, primary and secondary technical success, rates of local recurrence, adverse events (AEs), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were compiled. ResultsNinety-four patients (48 females [51%]; mean age, 68.2 years [range, 38–87 years]) with 94 central renal tumors were included. The mean maximal tumor diameter and mean RENAL nephrometry score were 37 mm (range, 15–67 mm) and 8 (range, 4–11), respectively. Primary technical success was achieved in 94% (n = 88) of procedures. Of the patients who did not achieve primary technical success, 3 underwent successful repeat PCA (secondary technical success, 97%; n = 91/94). The other 3 patients were surveilled for residual disease. Twenty-four patients (26%) required hydrodissection during PCA. Six patients (6%) experienced major AEs after PCA including hemorrhage requiring embolization (n = 3), hemorrhage requiring transfusions with admission (n = 2), and perinephric abscess necessitating drain placement (n = 1). Twenty-two patients (23%) experienced minor AEs. Nine patients (10%) experienced local recurrence during the follow-up period. OS was 94% (n = 88/94), whereas CSS was 98% (n = 92/94) during the study follow-up period (mean, 16 months [range, 1–102 months]). ConclusionsPCA of central renal tumors appears to be safe with high rates of technical success, even without the use of pyeloperfusion.

PADRES: a phase 2 clinical trial of neoadjuvant axitinib for complex partial nephrectomy.

To report the results of PADRES (Prior Axitinib as a Determinant of Outcome of Renal Surgery, NCT03438708), a study investigating neoadjuvant axitinib for tumours of high complexity with imperative indication for partial nephrectomy (PN). We conducted a single-arm phase II clinical trial of localized (cT1b-cT3M0) clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with imperative indications for nephron preservation, where PN is a high-risk procedure due to complexity (RENAL score 10-12). Axitinib 5 mg was administered twice daily for 8 weeks with repeat imaging at completion, followed by surgery. The primary outcome was successful completion of planned PN following axitinib treatment. Secondary objectives included changes in tumour diameter, RENAL nephrometry score, renal function and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1, and surgical complications. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled (median age 69 years). Prior to therapy, twenty patients (74.0%) had ≥ clinical T3a staged tumours. Axitinib resulted in reductions in tumour diameter (7.5 vs 6.2 cm; P < 0.001) and RENAL score (11 vs 10; P < 0.001). Nine patients (33.3%) had partial response based on RECIST and nine (33.3%) were clinically downstaged. PN was performed in twenty patients (74.0%); twenty-five patients (96.2%) had negative margins. Six patients (22.2%) had Clavien III-IV complications. The median change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (preoperative to last follow-up) was 8.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Neoadjuvant axitnib resulted in reductions in tumour size and complexity, enabling safe and feasible PN and functional preservation in patients with complex renal masses and imperative indication.

Re: Kamath KA, Pothy VS, Pandey H. Evaluation of modified RENAL nephrometry score in the prediction of perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy. Indian J Urol 2023;39:202-8.

Re: Kamath KA, Pothy VS, Pandey H. Evaluation of modified RENAL nephrometry score in the prediction of perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy. Indian J Urol 2023;39:202-8.

Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robot partial nephrectomy for kidney tumors

Background: Surgical techniques for small kidney tumors have been developed for decades, from open to robotic surgery. There are two approaches for partial nephrectomy: transperitoneal and retroperitoneal. We divided robotic partial nephrectomy cases into transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TRPN) and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN) and compared the outcomes.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy at our hospital between November 2019 and May 2022. We reviewed patients’ demographic and perioperative data. Results: Seventy robotic partial nephrectomies were performed (35 TRPN and 35 RRPN). There were significant differences in operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), tumor size, and the RENAL Nephrometry Score (RNS) between those who underwent TRPN and those who underwent RRPN. Larger tumors were noted in the TRPN group, and the RNS was higher. In contrast, the operation time was shorter, EBL was lower, and tumors were more likely to be located in the posterior and lower portions in the RRPN group than in the TRPN group.Conclusions: In our study, RRPN had advantages over TRPN in terms of operation time and EBL. However, TRPN tended to be performed rather than RRPN for tumors that were more complex in terms of size or RNS. Although the choice between RRPN and TRPN depends on the surgeon's preference, RRPN seems effective for treating small kidney tumors if selected appropriately.

Single-Probe Percutaneous Cryoablation with Liquid Nitrogen for the Treatment of T1a Renal Tumors

Kidney cancer accounts for 3% of adult malignancies and is increasingly detected through advanced imaging techniques, highlighting the need for effective treatment strategies. This retrospective study assessed the safety and efficacy of a new single-probe percutaneous cryoablation system using liquid nitrogen for treating T1a renal cancers. From May 2019 to May 2022, 25 consecutive patients from two academic hospitals, with a median age of 64.8 years [IQR 59; 75.5], underwent cryoablation for 26 T1a renal tumors. These tumors had a median size of 25.3 mm [20; 30.7] and a median RENAL nephrometry score, indicating tumor complexity, of 7 [5; 9]. No major complications arose, but three non-clinically relevant perirenal hematomas were detected on post-procedure CT scans. With a median follow-up of 795 days [573; 1020], the primary local control rate at one month stood was 80.8% (21 out of 26). The five recurrent lesions, which exhibited a higher renal score (p = 0.016), were treated again using cryoablation, achieving a secondary local control rate of 100%. No patient died, and the disease-free survival rate was 92% (23 out of 25). In conclusion, single-probe percutaneous cryoablation emerges as a promising modality for managing small renal masses. Notably, recurrence rates appear influenced by RENAL nephrometry scores, suggesting a need for further research to refine the technique.

Böbrek Tümör Skorlama Sistemleri Tümör Agresivitesini Tahmin Edebilir Mi?

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS), Padua score (PS), Centrality (C)-index and tumour aggressivity in T1 renal tumours and to question whether these scoring systems would provide information about the pathology of renal tumours to manage clinical judgement rather than the anatomy of tumour. Material and Methods: We evaluated 83 patients with stage 1 (T1N0M0) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) according to preoperative radiological and pathological staging. Patients were divided according to pathological results of cRCC into two groups: Patients with Fuhrman grade 1 or 2 (FG1-2) (Non-aggresive group (NAG)) and patients with FG3-4 and/or TNM Stage 3 (Aggressive group (AG)). RNS, PS and C-index scores were calculated for each patient. Finally,the relationship between nephrometry scores and pathological aggressivity were compared. Results: The mean RNS was calculated as 7.3±2.4. Total RNS was significantly higher in AG (9.2±1.2) than in NAG (6±2.2) (p&lt;0.001). RNS was an independent predictor of pathological aggressive disease (p&lt;0.001). The cut off value of RNS at the highest area under curve was 8 (p&lt;0.001). The mean PS was calculated as 8.1±1.6. PS was also an independent predictor of pathological aggressive disease (p&lt;0.001). The cut off value of PS at the highest area under curve was 8 (p&lt;0.001). The mean C-index score of AG (1.4 ± 0.4) was significantly lower (p&lt;0.001) than NAG (2.7±2.0). C-index is significant in predicting pathological aggressiveness (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggested that higher RNS and PS scores, lower C-index scores were associated with tumour aggressivity of renal tumours.

Usefulness of renal nephrometry scoring systems in the prediction of complications associated to percutaneous image-guided treatment for small renal masses

IntroductionDue to their increasing prevalence and complex management, renal tumors are challenging for health professionals. The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometry scores in the prediction of complications after percutaneous cryoablation. Material and methodsThe study prospectively analyzed 90 patients with 101 stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors treated with cryoablation. ResultsNinety patients with 101 small renal tumors who received cryoablative therapy were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 68 years and 74.4% were male. Most tumors were smaller than 4 cm (89.1%) and the mean PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were 8.65 and 7.35, respectively. Complications were observed in 12 cases. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores demonstrated moderate predictive power (AUC = 0.58 and AUC = 0.63, respectively) for post-cryoablation complications. ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for small renal tumors. The R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA renal nephrometry scores have moderate predictive power for complications associated with percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors.

Impacto de los sistemas de nefrometría renal en la valoración de las complicaciones en el tratamiento percutáneo guiado por imagen de las masas renales de pequeño tamaño

IntroductionDue to their increasing prevalence and complex management, renal tumors are challenging for health professionals. The study aims to evaluate the usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometry scores in the prediction of complications after percutaneous cryoablation. Material and methodsThe study prospectively analyzed 90 patients with 101 stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors treated with cryoablation. ResultsNinety patients with 101 small renal tumors who received cryoablative therapy were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 68 years and 74.4% were male. Most tumors were smaller than 4 cm (89.1%) and the mean PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were 8.65 and 7.35, respectively. Complications were observed in 12 cases. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores demonstrated moderate predictive power (AUC = 0.58 and AUC = 0.63, respectively) for post-cryoablation complications. ConclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for small renal tumors. The R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA renal nephrometry scores have moderate predictive power for complications associated with percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors.