Risk of pseudoaneurysm and bleeding complications after partial nephrectomy: comparison of tumor enucleation to standard margin technique.

Abstract

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard for the resection of amenable small renal masses. Some surgeons have adopted tumor enucleation (TE) over the standard margin PN (SPN) technique based on preservation of healthy renal parenchyma by following the tumor pseudocapsule. However, TE may also confer additional advantages due to avoidance of sharp incision including reduction in perioperative and bleeding complications. Therefore, we evaluated the rate of pseudoaneurysms and other complications following TE vs. SPN. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PN (TE and SPN) between 2008 and 2020 was conducted. Baseline characteristics were compared between the TE and SPN cohorts with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 534 patients were included, 195 (36.5%) receiving TE and 339 (63.5%) SPN. There were no differences in baseline patient demographics. There was no difference in RENAL nephrometry scores between the two groups (p=0.47). TE had lower rates of postoperative complications (11.3 vs. 21.5%, p=0.002). TE had less bleeding complications (2.1 vs. 8.0%, p=0.002) with no pseudoaneurysm events following TE compared to 12 following SPN (0.0 vs. 3.5%, p=0.008). Need for interventional radiology largely reflected pseudoaneurysm differences (0 (0.0%) TE vs. 13 (3.8%) SPN, p=0.006. Readmission occurred less often after TE vs. SPN (4.1 vs. 8.3%, p=0.07). Patients receiving TE experienced no clinically significant pseudoaneurysm formation and were less likely to have any bleeding complication or major complication postoperatively. TE may be preferred when minimizing morbidity aligns with patient selection and preferences.