You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy II (PD16)1 Sep 2021PD16-12 IS CHEST IMAGING NEEDED AS PART OF T1A RENAL CELL CARCINOMA SURVEILLANCE AFTER SURGICAL RESECTION? David Charles, John Fitzgerald, Brennen Cooper, Truman Landowski, Ray Yong, Ross Everett, Kenneth Jacobsohn, Scott Johnson, Bill See, and Peter Langenstroer David CharlesDavid Charles More articles by this author , John FitzgeraldJohn Fitzgerald More articles by this author , Brennen CooperBrennen Cooper More articles by this author , Truman LandowskiTruman Landowski More articles by this author , Ray YongRay Yong More articles by this author , Ross EverettRoss Everett More articles by this author , Kenneth JacobsohnKenneth Jacobsohn More articles by this author , Scott JohnsonScott Johnson More articles by this author , Bill SeeBill See More articles by this author , and Peter LangenstroerPeter Langenstroer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001998.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Following surgical excision of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 20-30% will recur, with 50-60% being lung metastases. The NCCN and AUA guidelines recommend chest surveillance via chest x-ray (CXR) at least annually for five years. Two previous studies found extraordinarily low incidence of pulmonary recurrence in T1-T3 RCC after surgical excision. Despite this, National and International guidelines continue to recommend CXR for surveillance after localized RCC. To that end, we evaluated our cohort of pT1a patients to understand the value of follow up chest imaging in a low-risk population. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of unique patients who underwent surgical excision of T1a RCC between January 2000 and January 2020. We expanded the review of standard baseline demographics to include baseline pulmonary pathology, RCC pathology, and the most contemporary chest imaging. We excluded pathology other than RCC, and those patients with pulmonary nodules on baseline imaging. RESULTS: With over 20 years of data, we identified 463 unique patients (mean age 58.3 years, range 23-87) that underwent surgical excision of T1a RCC with mean follow-up of 47.6 months (range 1–201). On most recent pulmonary surveillance imaging, 72.4% (335/463) had CXR while 27.6% (128/463) had chest CT performed. Regardless of modality, pulmonary recurrence was not detected on any surveillance imaging (0/463) in patients without pulmonary nodules on preoperative imaging. CONCLUSIONS: With the prior studies in mind, in patients without baseline preoperative lung pathology, we further corroborate that there is minimal to no clinical value in surveillance for pulmonary recurrence after resection of T1a RCC. Source of Funding: n/a © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e283-e283 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information David Charles More articles by this author John Fitzgerald More articles by this author Brennen Cooper More articles by this author Truman Landowski More articles by this author Ray Yong More articles by this author Ross Everett More articles by this author Kenneth Jacobsohn More articles by this author Scott Johnson More articles by this author Bill See More articles by this author Peter Langenstroer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Read full abstract