THE opportunity for low cost, high quality training and supervision is an attractive one to most scientists in the cytometry field. Many have had little if any training, no expertise based locally, or may not have the funds to attend regional or international training courses. In addition, rather than general cytometry they may require assistance with a particular application, which could be accomplished in a number of hours through support from an expert. Separately, shared resource scientists, also known as core facility staff, are generally responsible for the performance and upkeep of multiple complex instruments, as well as monitoring, training etc. Some acquisitions or cell sorts may take hours for a single run, and with limited staff the scientist is usually multitasking on an hourly basis. Also, if users of the core facility are having problems and staff is unavailable, valuable samples or time may be lost. There is potential for error at many steps of flow cytometry, including sample preparation, experimental design and fluorochrome selection, instrument set up, compensation, gating, analysis, and interpretation. External/offsite tracking may improve monitoring, and perhaps limit such errors. Also interand intra-instrumentation variations can lead to different results for the same sample. A means of unifying performance, setup, and interpretation is vital, in particular with multicenter collaborations. Peer-review of results and analysis, as well as hierarchical approval systems, provides some solutions, but further stream-lining is clearly beneficial. Remote access technology for cytometry (or remote cytometry) may offer solutions to many such issues and can be performed at very low costs to the institution. There is potential for such systems to facilitate instrumentation monitoring, control equipment in containment areas, speed up vendor service, improve training courses, increase collaborations, and further promote cytometry globally.