Remission Rate Research Articles

Calibration, Clinical Utility and Specificity of Clinical Decision Support Tools in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background and AimsClinical decision support tools (CDSTs) have been developed to predict response to vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). In addition to assessing their discrimination performance, our study aimed to evaluate their calibration, clinical utility and specificity. MethodsWe included 280 CD and 218 UC patients initiating VDZ, and 194 CD patients initiating UST. We assessed discrimination by comparing rates of effectiveness outcomes between response probability groups forecasted by CDSTs. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis evaluated the calibration and clinical utility of VDZ-CDSTs. Additionally, we examined the agreement between UST-CDST and VDZ-CDST in assigning response probability groups among CD patients starting UST. ResultsIn the overall cohort, CDSTs allocated 7.2%, 50.0% and 42.8% of the patients to the low, intermediate and high response probability groups, respectively. VDZ-CDSTs groups demonstrated significant differences in the rates of clinical and endoscopic response and remission, while UST-CDST groups showed significant discrimination only for clinical remission. Although VDZ-CDSTs overestimated clinical remission rates, they more accurately predicted rates of VDZ persistence without need for surgery or dose escalation. Compared to empirically treating all patients with VDZ, VDZ-CDSTs yielded higher net benefits in selecting patients who would continue VDZ without need for surgery or dose escalation. Finally, the agreement between UST-CDST and VDZ-CDST in predicting response was 73.7%. ConclusionVDZ-CDSTs significantly discriminated response to VDZ and were more beneficial in identifying patients who would continue therapy without requiring surgery or dose escalation, compared to treating all patients empirically.

A phase 1 study of the amino acid modulator pegcrisantaspase and venetoclax in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Glutamine dependency has been shown to be a metabolic vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prior studies using several in vivo AML models showed that depletion of plasma glutamine induced by the long-acting crisantaspase (pegcrisantaspase or PegC) was synergistic with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven), resulting in significantly reduced leukemia burden and enhanced survival. Here, we report a phase 1 study (NCT04666649) of Ven and PegC combination (VenPegC) for treating adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML, including patients who had previously received Ven. The primary endpoints were incidence of regimen limiting toxicities (RLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Twenty-five patients received at least one PegC dose with Ven and 18 efficacy-evaluable patients completed at least one VenPegC cycle; 12 (67%) had previously received Ven. Hyperbilirubinemia was the RLT and occurred in 60% of patients treated with VenPegC; 20% had Grade ≥3 bilirubin elevations. MTD was determined to be Ven 400 mg daily with biweekly PegC 750 IU/m2. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any Grade in 25 patients who received VenPegC included antithrombin III decrease (52%), elevated transaminases (36-48%), fatigue (28%), and hypofibrinogenemia (24%). No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic adverse events or clinical pancreatitis were observed. The overall complete remission rate in efficacy-evaluable patients was 33%. Response correlated with alterations in proteins involved in mRNA translation. In patients with RUNX1 mutations, the composite complete rate was 100%.

Extended course accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation as a substitute for depressed patients needing electroconvulsive therapy.

In response to restrictions on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) access during COVID-19, we designed a trial to assess the clinical outcomes service impacts, employing an extended course of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), in patients with moderate to severe depression in need of ECT. This open label clinical trial was comprised of 3 phases: (i) an acute phase, where iTBS treatments were administered 8 times daily, for up to 10 days; (ii) a tapering phase of 2 treatment days per week for 2 weeks, followed by 1 treatment day per week for 2 weeks; and (iii) a symptom-based relapse prevention phase, whereby treatments were scheduled based on symptom re-emergence, for up to 6 months. Of the 155 patients who completed the acute phase of the study, the remission rate was 16.1%. The mean reduction from baseline on the HRSD-24 was 29.4% (p < 0.001) and the response rate was 25.2%. Of the 110 patients who completed the tapering phase, the mean reduction from baseline was 42.6% (p < 0.001) and response and remission rates were 49.6% and 34.8%, respectively. Of the 61 patients who were eligible for the relapse prevention phase, 43 completed, with a mean reduction from baseline of 60.1% (p < 0.001); 7 patients relapsed during this phase. This study demonstrated that an extended aiTBS protocol safely led to meaningful clinical outcomes in patients with severe depression, who otherwise would have received ECT, and thus reduced pressure on ECT services during the pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04384965 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04384965?term=NCT04384965&rank=1 ).

The Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Patients Remaining Obese 6 Months after Metabolic Surgery.

The safety and efficacy of liraglutide as a weight loss intervention in individuals who remain obese within 1year post-metabolic surgery remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects and safety of liraglutide (1.8mg) in patients with persistent obesity at 6months postoperatively. This retrospective cohort study included 61 patients who remained obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 28.0kg/m2) at 6months postoperatively. Among these patients, 27 were treated with 1.8mg of liraglutide for 12weeks, whereas 34 served as controls. The primary endpoint was the change in total weight loss (%TWL) after 24weeks. Changes in weight, BMI, complications, and adverse events were also assessed. The liraglutide group showed a greater reduction in %TWL than the control group (11.6% ± 1.1% vs. 4.9% ± 1.0%), with an estimated treatment difference of 6.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-9.6%, P < 0.01). The adjusted mean differences in the reduction of weight and BMI between the liraglutide and control groups were -6.2kg (95% CI -8.9 to -3.4, P < 0.01) and -3.0kg/m2 (95% CI -4.2 to -1.7, P < 0.01), respectively. The liraglutide group exhibited increased rates of remission in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hypertension. No serious adverse reactions were observed. For patients who remained obese at 6months postoperatively, 12-week liraglutide treatment resulted in increased weight loss, improved metabolic control, and high rate of remission for obesity-related metabolic diseases after 24weeks. Earlier and more timely adjuvant weight loss medication intervention based on BMI within 1year postoperatively may enhance weight loss after metabolic surgery. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Randomised controlled trial comparing different intersession intervals of intermittent theta burst delivered to the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex

BackgroundIntermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that can be administered in a fraction of the time of standard rTMS. Applying multiple daily...

Managing Crohn’s Disease Postoperative Recurrence Beyond Prophylaxis: A Comprehensive Review with Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims: Postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease remains a significant clinical challenge, with high recurrence rates despite advancements in medical therapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of various treatments for managing postoperative recurrence following ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s disease. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting on the therapeutic management of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Studies encompassing patients with an endoscopic Rutgeerts score of at least I2 were included. Results: Ustekinumab showed promise, achieving significant endoscopic and clinical success in difficult-to-treat patients. Anti-TNF agents demonstrated superior endoscopic and clinical remission rates compared to mesalamine and azathioprine. Retreatment with anti-TNF therapy remained effective even after preoperative failure. Thalidomide showed efficacy in refractory Crohn’s disease, but carries significant toxicity risks, necessitating careful patient selection and monitoring. Combination therapies and non-pharmacologic strategies like enteral nutrition offer additional options, though patient compliance remains challenging. Conclusions: Personalized treatment plans based on individual risk factors and biomarkers are crucial. Infliximab is recommended as the first-line treatment, with ustekinumab and vedolizumab as alternatives in case of anti-TNF failure or intolerance. Early intervention, patient education, and ongoing evaluation are essential for optimizing long-term outcomes in managing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease.

Ruxolitinib plus steroids for acute graft versus host disease: a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial

Newly diagnosed patients with high-risk acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) often experience poor clinical outcomes and low complete remission rates. Ruxolitinib with corticosteroids showed promising efficacy in improving response and failure free survival in our phase I study. This study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04061876) sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of combining ruxolitinib (RUX, 5 mg/day) with corticosteroids (1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone, RUX/steroids combined group) versus using methylprednisolone alone (2 mg/kg/day, steroids-only group). Newly diagnosed patients with intermediate- or high-risk aGVHD were included, with risk levels classified by either the Minnesota aGVHD Risk Score or biomarker assessment. Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 into 2 groups: 99 patients received RUX combined with methylprednisolone, while the other 99 received methylprednisolone alone as the initial treatment. The RUX/steroids group showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) on day 28 (92.9%) compared to the steroids-only group (70.7%, Odds Ratio [OR] = 5.8; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 2.4–14.0; P < 0.001). Similarly, the ORR on day 56 was higher in the RUX/steroids group (85.9% vs. 46.5%; OR = 7.07; 95% CI, 3.36–15.75; P < 0.001). Additionally, the 18-month failure-free survival was significantly better in the RUX/steroids group (57.2%) compared to the steroids-only group (33.3%; Hazard Ratio = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31–0.68; P < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) frequencies were comparable between both groups, with the exception of fewer grade 4 AEs in the RUX/steroids group (26.3% vs. 50.5% P = 0.005). To our knowledge, this study is the first prospective, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate that adding ruxolitinib to the standard methylprednisolone regimen provides an effective and safe first-line treatment for newly diagnosed high-risk acute GVHD.

Clinical efficacy and its influencing factors of vedolizumab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy and its influencing factors of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: The patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, who underwent VDZ treatment at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from November 2020 to November 2023 were retrospectively included. Based on whether 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was used in combination with VDZ treatment, the patients were divided into combination group (received combination therapy of VDZ and 5-ASA) and monotherapy group (received monotherapy of VDZ). The clinical response rate and biological remission rate were analyzed at week 14. The clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate were analyzed at week 38. The differences in efficacy of VDZ between the two groups were compared at week 14 and week 38, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression model was applied to analyze the influencing factors of clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate in UC patients. Results: A total of 137 patients were included, including 74 males and 63 females, aged 18-76 (44±14) years old; Seventy-six cases in combination group and 61 cases in monotherapy group. At week 14 of VDZ treatment, the clinical response rate and biological remission rate were 79.6% (109/137) and 80.5% (33/41), respectively. At week 38, the clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate were 78.8% (108/137) and 47.9% (57/119), respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical response rate and biological remission rate between combination group and monotherapy group at week 14 (both P>0.05). The clinical remission rate [85.5% (65/76) vs 70.5% (43/61), P=0.032] and mucosal healing rate [56.5% (39/69) vs 36.0% (18/50), P=0.027] were higher in combination group than those in monotherapy group at week 38. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the combination therapy of VDZ and 5-ASA (OR=2.48, 95%CI: 1.02-6.03) and the clinical response at week 14 (OR=5.05, 95%CI: 1.98-12.85) were influencing factors of clinical remission rate of UC patients at week 38. Moreover, the baseline serum albumin (Alb) level ≥42.5 g/L was the influencing factor for the mucosal healing rate of UC patients at week 38 (OR=4.60, 95%CI: 2.06-10.24). Conclusions: VDZ is effective in treating UC patients. Both the combination of 5-ASA and the clinical response at week 14 are the influencing factors of the clinical remission rate at week 38. In addition, the baseline serum Alb level ≥42.5 g/L is the influencing factor of the mucosal healing rate at week 38.

Outcomes among non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients with acute myeloid Leukaemia: A Danish population-based cohort study.

Non-Western immigrant patients (NWIPs) may be a vulnerable population when diagnosed and treated for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Here we report selected quality parameters related to diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of newly diagnosed AML among NWIPs (n = 119) and Danish-born patients (DBPs) (n = 4689). No adjusted differences were observed for time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment, treatment allocation, rates of complete remission, early death, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and overall survival between NWIPs and DBPs. Among patients allocated for intensive chemotherapy, NWIPs were less likely to participate in clinical trials. The findings highlight equitable AML care but underscore the need to enhance NWIP participation in clinical trials.

The evolving role of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma

Since their initial approval as single agent therapy for multiply relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), the PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been incorporated into second-line salvage regimens, and they are being investigated in upfront therapy of newly diagnosed patients. As second-line therapy in combination with brentuximab vedotin or multi-agent chemotherapy, nivolumab and pembrolizumab provide high complete remission rates and durable progression-free survival after consolidative autologous stem cell transplant. Incorporation of these agents into frontline chemotherapy regimens is feasible, and early results from a Phase III trial of nivolumab-AVD compare favorably with the existing standard for advanced stage HL, brentuximab vedotin plus AVD. As nivolumab and pembrolizumab move into earlier lines of HL therapy, open research questions include the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor regimens in patients who relapse after frontline exposure to nivolumab or pembrolizumab; the selection of patients with relapsed HL who can achieve durable remissions without autologous stem cell transplant; and the efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitors in the frontline therapy of patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Carotegrast Methyl in Japanese Patients with Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Carotegrast methyl (CGM) is an oral, small-molecule α4-integrin antagonist, which became clinically available in Japan in May 2022. CGM is approved for remission induction treatment for moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC) with an inadequate response or intolerance to 5-aminosalicylates. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study of Japanese patients with moderately active UC to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of CGM as remission induction treatment. Results: Of 14 patients, 71% (10/14) were women, and the median (range) age was 47 (20–68) years. Disease types were proctitis in 7% (1/14), left-sided colitis in 50% (7/14), and total colitis in 43% (6/14). With a median (range) treatment duration of 8 (2–26) weeks, the rate of endoscopic improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] of 0 or 1) was 64% (9/14), and the rate of endoscopic remission (MES of 0) was 57% (8/14). After treatment with CGM, the median (range) MES decreased significantly from 3.0 (2–3) to 0.0 (0–3) (p = 0.008), the Mayo score decreased significantly from 7.0 (5–9) to 0.0 (0–9) (p = 0.006), and the clinical activity index decreased significantly from 6.0 (1–11) to 0.0 (0–9) (p = 0.015). Stool and diarrhea frequencies decreased significantly after initiating CGM, and the percentage of patients with bloody stool and abdominal pain tended to decrease. The cumulative relapse-free rate at week 26 among 9 patients who achieved endoscopic improvement with CGM was 77.8% (95% confidence interval, 36.5%–93.9%). No adverse drug reactions, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, were reported during the study period. Conclusion: This single-center, retrospective, observational study of 14 Japanese patients with UC showed that CGM was safe and effective as a remission induction treatment for moderately active UC with an inadequate response to 5-aminosalicylates in real-world settings.

The Potential Role of Polyphenol Supplementation in Preventing and Managing Depression: A Review of Current Research

Depression is a common mental illness that affects 5% of the adult population globally. The most common symptoms of depression are low mood, lack of pleasure from different activities, poor concentration, and reduced energy levels for an extended period, and it affects the emotions, behaviors, and overall well-being of an individual. The complex pathophysiology of depression presents challenges for current therapeutic options involving a biopsychosocial treatment plan. These treatments may have a delayed onset, low remission and response rates, and undesirable side effects. Researchers in nutrition and food science are increasingly addressing depression, which is a significant public health concern due to the association of depression with the increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases and premature mortality. Polyphenols present in our diet may significantly impact the prevention and treatment of depression. The primary mechanisms include reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, regulating monoamine neurotransmitter levels, and modulating the microbiota–gut–brain axis and hyperactivity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the effects of dietary polyphenols on depression and explores the underlying mechanisms of these effects for the benefit of human health. It also highlights studies that are looking at clinical trials to help future researchers incorporate these substances into functional diets, nutritional supplements, or adjunctive therapy to prevent and treat depression.

Avatrombopag Elevates Platelet Counts and Reduces Platelet Transfusions in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases During the Perioperative Period of Liver Transplantation

ABSTRACTBackgroundAvatrombopag has been approved for elevating platelet counts in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs) accompanied by thrombocytopenia (TCP). However, limited research focuses on its safety and efficacy in CLD patients during the perioperative period of liver transplantation (LT).MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled CLD patients with severe TCP who received avatrombopag during the perioperative period of LT and analyzed therapeutic efficacy, changes in platelet counts, and related adverse events. Comparisons were conducted between liver transplant recipients who received avatrombopag and those who did not use platelet‐raising drugs, focusing on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding as well as platelet transfusions.ResultsOf 93 patients who received avatrombopag, 67 cases (72%) achieved remission, with their platelet counts increasing to over 50 × 109/L without transfusion. Additionally, 38 cases (40.9%) reached platelet counts above 100 × 109/L, achieving complete remission. The overall remission rate was significantly correlated with the baseline platelet counts, suggesting that individuals with higher baselines (25−50 × 109/L vs. &lt; 25 × 109/L) were more likely to achieve remission (82.1% vs. 57.7%, χ2 = 5.989, p = 0.014). Using propensity score‐overlap weighting to balance the baseline bias, we compared 33 liver transplant recipients who received avatrombopag to those who did not receive any platelet‐raising drugs. Recipients who used avatrombopag achieved significantly higher platelet counts both before and after propensity score‐overlap weighting ([63.76 ± 31.33] × 109/L vs. [45.73 ± 16.44] × 109/L, p = 0.004; [65.37 ± 38.41] × 109/L vs. [42.73 ± 17.27] × 109/L, p = 0.044) and required fewer intraoperative and postoperative platelet transfusions (p &lt; 0.05). No adverse events related to avatrombopag were observed.ConclusionsAvatrombopag is safe and effective for CLD patients with TCP during the perioperative period of LT, resulting in elevated platelet counts and reduced need for platelet transfusions.

Assessing the practice of total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an online survey among radiation oncology departments in Germany and German-speaking regions of Austria and Switzerland.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) of rectal cancer improves rates of pathological complete remission and progression-free survival. With improved clinical response rates, interest grew in a non-operative approach/watch and wait (WaW) for this disease. In 2020, the working groups of ACO/AIO/ARO published a consensus statement on the use of TNT, including a non-operative approach. However, the best combination scheme remains unclear. Despite the increasing use of TNT, there is a lack of comprehensive data on its current implementation and practices. To address this knowledge gap, a multicenter survey was conducted to capture the use of TNT protocols in German-speaking radiotherapy departments. At the beginning of 2023, a GDPR-compliant online survey was conducted in Germany, Austria, and German-speaking Switzerland. The questionnaire comprised 43 questions covering various aspects of TNT, including chemotherapy and WaW concepts. Most respondents (98.4%) confirmed awareness of the consensus on TNT for rectal cancer. Institutions treated an average of 30.22 rectal cancer patients annually. Most respondents (76.2%) reported treating over 80% of patients neoadjuvantly. Regarding TNT, 33.3% treated 21-50% with such a protocol. No significant association was found between the institution type and TNT application. In 62/63 cases, tumor board discussion was standard before offering TNT. VMAT was the predominant technique (82.5%). For rectal cancer dosing, the 50/50.4Gy scheme was most common, followed by 45Gy with a boost and the 5 × 5Gy scheme. Dosing schemes for TNT varied slightly, with more participants reporting the use of 5 × 5Gy compared to radiation therapy for rectal cancer in general. CBCT was the primary IGRT method (88.9%). Larger hospitals typically administered chemotherapy themselves, while private practices collaborated with medical oncologists (p < 0.0001). The most common concurrent chemotherapy drugs were 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine (64.4%) and oxaliplatin (37.3%). A WaW strategy was reported to be institutional implemented by 63.8%. The timing of offering WaW was split, with 50% offering it after radiochemotherapy and 47% during the informed consent talk. For planned WaW, 62% prefer normofractionated TNT. TNT appears to be widely implemented in the German-speaking radio-oncological community, regardless of the type of institution. Image-guided therapy, multidisciplinary team decisions, and internal guidelines play an important role. TNT seems to have already altered treatment protocols for rectal cancer toward an organ-preserving approach in selected cases. In these WaW cases, normofractionation appears to be preferred over hypofractionation.

A Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Brexpiprazole 2 mg Daily in Japanese Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy is common among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The efficacy and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole 2 mg/day has recently been confirmed during the 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 (BLESS) study, which evaluated brexpiprazole at 1 mg/day and 2 mg/day versus placebo as adjunctive therapy to antidepressant therapies in 740 Japanese patients with MDD and an inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy. This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of adjunctive fixed-dose brexpiprazole 2 mg/day in Japanese patients with MDD. An open-label, 52-week study enrolled rollover patients who completed the 6-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 BLESS study (NCT03697603), and de novo patients aged ≥ 65 years. Patients were titrated to fixed-dose brexpiprazole 2 mg/day from Week 1. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; primary outcome) and clinical and laboratory variables. Efficacy was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) 17-item total score, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) score. In total, 247 patients [rollover, n = 216; de novo (previously unexposed), n = 31] were included in the safety/efficacy populations, and 138 (rollover, n = 132; de novo, n = 6; 55.9%) completed the study. Common TEAEs (incidence ≥ 10%) were weight gain [33.2% (n = 82)], akathisia [23.5% (n = 58)], nasopharyngitis [21.1% (n = 52)], and somnolence [10.5% (n = 26)]. TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 26.7% of patients receiving brexpiprazole and 58.1% of de novo patients. The mean (SD) increase in body weight from baseline to Week 52 [observed cases (OC)] was 4.2 (6.5) kg (n = 138); 44.5% (n = 110) had weight gain ≥ 7% at any postbaseline visit. There were no cases of tardive dyskinesia and no AEs related to suicide/suicide attempts. One death occurred (unknown cause), which was unrelated to study treatment. Improvements in the MADRS total score were observed from baseline over the course of the 52-week study [mean (SD) change at Week 52 (OC): - 7.3 (8.7)] for all patients receiving brexpiprazole. The overall MADRS response rate and remission rate in patients receiving brexpiprazole was 41.3% (n = 57) and 34.8% (n = 48), respectively, at Week 52 (OC). Improvements in CGI-S, HAM-D 17 item total score, and SDS mean scores were also observed from baseline over the 52-week study, with a mean (SD) change from baseline at Week 52 (OC) of - 0.8 (1.0), - 5.9 (6.3), and - 1.0 (2.2), respectively, indicating a sustained improvement in symptoms with long-term brexpiprazole treatment. This is the first study to evaluate the safety profile of brexpiprazole 2 mg/day in Japanese patients with MDD, including older adults, which is similar to previous reports, with no new safety risks, and continued efficacy over 52 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03737474; registered on 29 July 2018).

Targeting Tumor Hypoxia with Nanoparticle-Based Therapies: Challenges, Opportunities, and Clinical Implications.

Hypoxia is a crucial factor in tumor biology, affecting various solid tumors to different extents. Its influence spans both early and advanced stages of cancer, altering cellular functions and promoting resistance to therapy. Hypoxia reduces the effectiveness of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, making it a target for improving therapeutic outcomes. Despite extensive research, gaps persist, necessitating the exploration of new chemical and pharmacological interventions to modulate hypoxia-related pathways. This review discusses the complex pathways involved in hypoxia and the associated pharmacotherapies, highlighting the limitations of current treatments. It emphasizes the potential of nanoparticle-based platforms for delivering anti-hypoxic agents, particularly oxygen (O2), to the tumor microenvironment. Combining anti-hypoxic drugs with conventional cancer therapies shows promise in enhancing remission rates. The intricate relationship between hypoxia and tumor progression necessitates novel therapeutic strategies. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems can significantly improve cancer treatment efficacy by targeting hypoxia-associated pathways. The synergistic effects of combined therapies underscore the importance of multimodal approaches in overcoming hypoxia-mediated resistance. Continued research and innovation in this area hold great potential for advancing cancer therapy and improving patient outcomes.

Corticosteroid Use in Randomized Clinical Trials of Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review aims to elucidate the use of corticosteroids in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics and small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed corticosteroid use during both the induction and maintenance phases, highlighting areas needing standardization and improvement in clinical research. We selected placebo-controlled phase 3 RCTs involving adults with moderate to severe IBD. These studies included detailed reports on corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance phases, with clinical remission and/or corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR) as primary endpoints. Initially, 324 studies were identified and refined to 26 RCTs after screening. Analysis revealed variability in corticosteroid administration. Over time, corticosteroid use showed a decreasing trend (Spearman ρ = -0.42, P = .045). Studies allowing higher corticosteroid doses (up to 40mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) reported a higher proportion of corticosteroid users (51.8%, range: 42.9%-61%) compared to those excluding patients on doses >20mg/day (37.5%, range: 31.6%-51.8%; P = .007) or >30mg/day (41.1%, range: 29.6%-53.7%; P=.023). Trials with mandatory tapering protocols showed a narrower gap between overall clinical remission and CSF-CR rates, with an average difference of 6% in the group without mandatory tapering and 1.2% in the group with forced tapering (T-test P=.038; Cohen's d ≈ 1.1). This review highlights the variability in corticosteroid use across RCTs and its impact on evaluating new IBD therapies. Standardizing tapering protocols and defining CSF-CR are essential for accurate outcomes.

Comparative analysis of single versus tandem autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma in Korea: the KMM2102 study

Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation can improve the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma. However, the precise role of tandem transplantation remains debatable. We evaluated the clinical benefits of tandem transplantation retrospectively. Of the 655 included patients, 117 underwent tandem transplantation; the remaining were assigned to the control group. After a single transplantation, the tandem group achieved a complete remission (CR) rate of 24.8%, which increased to 46.2% after a second transplantation. The tandem group had a significantly longer median PFS than the control group in patients with International Staging System (ISS) III and high-risk cytogenetics (23.1 vs. 14.7 months, p = 0.007 for ISS III; 21.7 vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.042 for high-risk cytogenetics). The tandem group exhibited significantly superior PFS to the control group (20.3 vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.003) among patients who failed to achieve CR after a single transplantation. Tandem transplantation was associated with significantly improved PFS after adjusting for maintenance therapy in patients with ISS III, those with high-risk cytogenetics, and those who did not achieve CR after a single transplantation. Following propensity score matching, the tandem group exhibited significantly longer PFS than the control group (30.3 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.028). Tandem transplantation should be considered in high-risk patients.

Midostaurin shapes macroclonal and microclonal evolution of FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.

Despite the use of midostaurin (MIDO) with intensive chemotherapy (ICT) as the front-line treatment for FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), complete remission rates are close to 60-70%, and relapses occur in over 40% of cases. Here we studied the molecular mechanisms underlying refractory/relapsed (R/R) situation in FLT3-mutated AML patients. We conducted a retrospective and multicenter study involving 150 patients with R/R AML harboring FLT3-ITD (n=130) and/or FLT3-TKD (n=26) at diagnosis assessed by standard methods. Patients were treated in front-line with ICT + MIDO (n=54) or ICT alone (n=96) according to the diagnosis date and label of MIDO. The evolution of FLT3 clones and co-mutations was analyzed in paired diagnosis-R/R samples by targeted high-throughput sequencing. Using a dedicated algorithm for FLT3-ITD detection, 189 FLT3-ITD microclones (allelic ratio [AR] < 0.05) and 225 macroclones (AR ≥ 0.05) were detected at both time points. At R/R disease, the rate of FLT3-ITD persistence was lower in patients treated with ICT + MIDO compared with patients not receiving MIDO (68% vs. 87.5%, P=0.011). In patients receiving ICT + MIDO, detection of multiple FLT3-ITD clones (referred to as "clonal interference") was associated with a higher FLT3-ITD persistence rate at R/R disease (multiple clones: 88% vs. single clones: 57%, P=0.049). Considering both treatment groups, if only 24% of FLT3-ITD microclones detected at diagnosis were retained at relapse, 43% of them became macroclones. Together, these results identify parameters influencing the fitness of FLT3-ITD clones and highlight the importance of using sensitive techniques for FLT3--ITD screening in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a highly heterogeneous disease group. Ibrutinib's monotherapy or combination therapy is effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. However, the treatment response in R/R DLBCL varies from 15% to 90% with different regimens, and the tolerance remains controversial. The efficacy and safety of ibrutinib monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with R/R DLBCL remain uncertain. The PubMed, CBM, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched from their inception to July 2021. The total complete remission rate (CRR) and overall response rate in R/R DLBCL patients treated with ibrutinib were 26% and 49%, respectively. The CRR of ibrutinib combination therapy was significantly higher than the ibrutinib monotherapy (45% vs. 19%). Moreover, the CRR of patients was 40% in double expressing lymphoma, 35% in central nervous system lymphoma, and 33% in nongerminal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL, which was higher than the 8% in those with the GCB subtype. The pooled median PFS and overall survival were 5.57 and 10.17 months, respectively. GCB-DLBCL had the worst overall survival (5.1 months). Nevertheless, we found that combination regimens had no survival advantage compared with monotherapy (P > 0.05), indicating that combination therapy was only a transitional treatment and bridge for chimeric antigen receptor T cells or other treatments. Moreover, 12% of patients on ibrutinib combination therapy had ≥grade 3 adverse events compared with 9% on ibrutinib monotherapy. Ibrutinib monotherapy or combination therapy was safe and effective in treating R/R DLBCL with tolerable adverse reactions.