Remission Rate Research Articles

A retrospective comparison of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) in the treatment of acute cholangitis

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) can rapidly alleviate obstruction, facilitate bile drainage, and reduce pressure in the bile duct. In this study, to evaluate the effect of plastic biliary stent on the recurrence rate of choledocholithiasis in patients with actual cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangioangiography (ERCP), we a comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety between ENBD and ERBD in inflammatory remission rate, complication rate, and success rate of secondary or multiple endoscopic lithotomy. A total of 347 patients undergoing ENBD and ERBD were enrolled in this retrospective study. Preoperative assessments including blood tests, electrocardiography, abdominal ultrasonography, CT scans, MRI, or MRCP were conducted on all participants. Additionally, serum CRP and amylase levels were measured using a magnetic nanobead-based immunoassay. We found that The success rate of stone removal in the ENBD group was higher than that in the ERBD group (90.8% vs. 72.7%) (P <0.0001). The remission rate of inflammation in the ERBD group (100.0%) was higher than that in the ENBD group (98.7%) (P >0.05). No significant difference was observed between the ERBD group and the ENBD group in preoperative and postoperative inflammatory indexes (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, white blood cells, neutrophils, CRP, and serum amylase). Moreover, there were significant differences in post-ERCP pancreatitis between the ERBD group and ENBD group. These results suggest that both ENBD and ERBD can effectively improve clinical efficacy. Moreover, magnetic nanobeads have good application in serum index detection to increase detection efficiency.

Impact of Recurrent Weight Gain Thresholds on Comorbid Conditions Progression Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Defining recurrent weight gain after metabolic bariatric surgery poses a significant challenge. Our study aimed to standardize recurrent weight gain measurements in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and ascertain its association with comorbidity progression. We conducted a retrospective data analysis on 122 patients who underwent LSG, tracking their progress over 2-7years. Data on weight, blood pressure measurements, and laboratory tests were collected, focusing on the postoperative period to identify nadir weight, total weight loss, and recurrent weight gain. Significant weight loss and comorbidity remission were noted, with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia showing substantial remission rates of 85.71%, 68.24%, and 85.37%, respectively. The median recurrent weight gain was 6.30kg within 12months of the nadir. Progression proportion of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were 8.20%, 44.26%, and 40.98%, respectively. Hypertension progression was strongly associated with a recurrent weight gain ≥ 10kg and ≥ 20% of maximum weight loss. Dyslipidemia progression was significantly correlated with recurrent weight gain ≥ 10kg and ≥ 20% of maximum weight loss. Diabetes progression was significantly correlated with recurrent weight gain ≥ 10% of pre-surgery body weight and ≥ 25% of maximum weight loss. A ≥ 10% weight gain of maximum weight loss did not significantly impact the progression of these conditions. Recurrent weight gain ≥ 20% of maximum weight loss can be treated as a specific threshold indicating comorbidity progression post-LSG. Standardizing the measurement of recurrent weight gain can help healthcare providers to implement targeted management strategies to optimize long-term health outcomes.

Remission Factors for Ustekinumab Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of Real-World Data in Japan

Ustekinumab (UST) is an anti–IL-12/23p40 monoclonal antibody used to treat inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to investigate the effectiveness of UST administration in achieving remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to determine patient characteristics that influence its effectiveness. Of 88 UC patients who received UST from March 2020 to August 2023, 47 with traceable data and for whom 56 weeks had elapsed since the start of treatment received UST to induce remission. The remission rates at 8 weeks were 66% overall, 73.7% for Bio Naïve (never used biologics/JAK inhibitors), and 60.7% for Bio Failure (used biologics/JAK inhibitors) groups. Remission rates at 56 weeks were 70.2% overall, 73.7% for Bio Naïve, and 67.9% for Bio Failure groups. Ustekinumab showed good mid-to-long-term results in the induction of remission of UC in both Bio Naïve and Bio Failure groups. The group showing remission at 8 weeks had a significantly higher non-relapse or continuation rate (proportion of patients with no worsened symptoms necessitating surgery/drug change) at 56 weeks. Predictive factors for achieving remission after UST in UC were female gender, low body mass index, and low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. Thus, UST is effective for moderate-to-severe UC.

Sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus chidamide (histone deacetylase inhibitor) in relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma (SCENT): a phase Ib/II study.

Anti-PD-1 antibodies are a favorable treatment for relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer T cell lymphoma (RR-ENKTL), however, the complete response (CR) rate and the duration of response (DOR) need to be improved. This phase 1b/2 study investigated the safety and efficacy of sintilimab, a fully human anti-PD-1 antibody, plus chidamide, an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor in 38 patients with RR-ENKTL. Expected objective response rate (ORR) of combination treatment was 80%. Patients received escalating doses of chidamide, administered concomitantly with fixed-dose sintilimab in 21-days cycles up to 12 months. No dose-limiting events were observed, RP2D of chidamide was 30 mg twice a week. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in phase 2. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 37), overall response rate was 59.5% with a complete remission rate of 48.6%. The median DOR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 25.3, 23.2, and 32.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (28.9%) and thrombocytopenia (10.5%), immune-related AEs were reported in 18 (47.3%) patients. Exploratory biomarker assessment suggested that a combination of dynamic plasma ctDNA and EBV-DNA played a vital prognostic role. STAT3 mutation shows an unfavorable prognosis. Although outcome of anticipate ORR was not achieved, sintilimab plus chidamide was shown to have a manageable safety profile and yielded encouraging CR rate and DOR in RR-ENKTL for the first time. It is a promising therapeutic option for this population.

Individualized strategies for depression: narrative review of clinical profiles responsive to vortioxetine.

Depression is a highly heterogeneous disorder, often resulting in suboptimal response and remission rates. This underscores the need for more nuanced clinical characterization of patients to tailor individualized treatment plans. Emerging evidence highlights the critical role of cognitive and emotional dysfunction in major depression, prompting the exploration of novel therapeutic interventions that target these specific symptom domains. Vortioxetine, a multimodal antidepressant, enhances serotonergic activity while also modulating several other neurotransmitter systems involved in depressive symptoms such as emotional blunting, anhedonia, and cognitive dysfunction. Numerous randomized, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated vortioxetine's efficacy and safety in treating depression, particularly in specific subgroups of depressed patients, including those with cognitive deficits and comorbid anxiety symptoms or disorders. Although not randomized or placebo-controlled, studies have also shown vortioxetine's efficacy in depressed patients with emotional blunting or anhedonia. Vortioxetine's ability to effectively treat a range of depressive symptoms, including anhedonia, emotional blunting, anxiety, and cognitive dysfunction, provides an individualized treatment solution for depressed individuals suffering from these symptoms. The purpose of this paper is to identify clinical profiles of patients who may benefit from vortioxetine, with the goal of optimizing therapeutic outcomes. Vortioxetine has been shown to be effective for patients with depression and symptoms such as anhedonia, emotional blunting, anxiety, and cognitive dysfunction. Tailoring treatment plans to individual needs and personalizing treatment choices based on the specific symptoms presented by depressed patients improve treatment outcomes.

Effect of pharmacogenomic testing on the clinical treatment of patients with depressive disorder: A randomized clinical trial

BackgroundPharmacotherapy is one of the primary treatment modalities for depression. However, there is considerable variability in the individual response to antidepressant medications. Personalized medicine guided by pharmacogenomic testing may hold promise in addressing this issue. MethodsIn this study, 665 depressive patients were randomly enrolled into two groups: the pharmacogenomic testing group (n = 333) and the control group (n = 332). In the testing group, participants underwent pharmacogenomic testing, and clinicians customized the treatment plan with the result, while the control group relied solely on clinicians' experience. The primary outcomes were the proportion of remission and response, assessed with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The secondary outcomes included changes in HDRS scores over time and frequency of adverse drug reactions by the participants. ResultsAt week 8, the pharmacogenomic testing group showed significantly higher remission rates (24.0 % v.s. 15.1 %; RR = 1.117; P = 0.007) and response rates (39.3 % v.s. 25.7 %; RR = 1.225; P < 0.001) compared to the control group. By week 12, the pharmacogenomic testing group continued to demonstrate significant advantages in remission (31.0 % v.s. 20.0 %; RR = 1.159; P = 0.003) and response (48.7 % v.s. 37.3 %; RR = 1.224; P = 0.006). Additionally, adverse drug reactions were less frequent in the pharmacogenomic testing group. LimitationsThis study is not blind to clinicians and it's a single-center study.Conclusions: Pharmacogenomic testing-guided drug therapy can provide greater assistance in the treatment of depression.

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) in major depressive disorder with anxious distress—a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial

BackgroundComorbid anxiety disorders and anxious distress are highly prevalent among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). The presence of the DSM-5 anxious distress specifier (ADS) has been associated with worse treatment outcomes and chronic disease course. Few studies have evaluated the therapeutic effects of High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on depressive and anxiety symptoms among MDD patients with ADS. The current randomized controlled trial aims to assess the efficacy of HD-tDCS as an augmentation therapy with antidepressants compared to sham-control in subjects of MDD with ADS.MethodsMDD patients with ADS will be recruited and randomly assigned to the active HD-tDCS or sham HD-tDCS group. In both groups, patients will receive the active or sham intervention in addition to their pre-existing antidepressant therapy, for 2 weeks with 5 sessions per week, each lasting 30 min. The primary outcome measures will be the change of depressive symptoms, clinical response, and the remission rate as measured with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) before and after the intervention and at the 2nd and 6th week after the completed intervention. Secondary outcome measures include anxiety symptoms, cognitive symptoms, disability assessment, and adverse effects.DiscussionThe HD-tDCS applied in this trial may have treatment effects on MDD with ADS and have minimal side effects.Trial registrationThe trial protocol is registered with www.chictr.org.cn under protocol registration number ChiCTR2300071726. Registered 23 May 2023.

The efficacy of the combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents versus HAG agents in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study

ABSTRACT Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents with the HAG regimen. Methods: We studied 52 cases of newly diagnosed AML and 26 cases of relapsed refractory AML, (including AML patients with treatment-related and ELN-adverse risk disease (n = 50)). These patients were treated with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents and HAG regimens, respectively. Results: Twenty-nine patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia were treated with VEN-HMA (venetoclax-hypomethylating agent), while 23 patients were treated with HAG. The median age of the VEN-HMA group was 70 years, while the HAG group had a median age of 69 years. The VEN-HMA group achieved a significantly higher rate of complete remission (82.7%) compared to the cohort treated with the HAG regimen (21.7%) (P < 0.001). At the same time, the VEN-HMA group exhibited a significant survival advantage compared to the HAG treatment group(HR = 0.328, 95%CI: 0.158-0.683, P = 0.003). In patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, 43.8% of patients in the VEN-HMA treatment group achieved complete remission, which was similar to the 50% in the HAG treatment group (P > 0.99). The median overall survival was similar between the VEN-HMA and HAG groups, with 4 and 3.67 months, respectively (P = 0.290). Conclusions: In conclusion, our analyses indicated that VEN-HMA resulted in better therapeutic outcomes compared to HAG for newly diagnosed AML patients, with higher rates of complete remission and overall survival. In relapsed/refractory AML patients, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the two treatments and further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Repeat endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for residual or recurrent cushing's disease: safety, feasibility, and success.

The success and outcomes of repeat endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for residual or recurrent Cushing's disease (CD) are underreported in the literature. This study aims to address this gap by assessing the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of repeat ETS in these patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients who underwent a total of 65 repeat ETS performed by a single neurosurgeon between January 2006 and December 2020. Data including demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological, and operative details were collected from electronic medical records. Logistic regression was utilized to identify potential predictors associated with sustained remission. Among the cases, 40 (61.5%) had previously undergone microscopic surgery, while 25 (38.5%) had prior endoscopic procedures. Remission was achieved in 47 (83.9%) patients after the first repeat ETS, with an additional 9 (16.1%) achieving remission after the second repeat procedure. During an average follow-up period of 97.25 months, the recurrence rate post repeat surgery was 6.38%. Sustained remission was achieved in 48 patients (85.7%), with 44 after the first repeat ETS and 4 following the second repeat ETS. Complications included transient diabetes insipidus (DI) in 5 (7.6%) patients, permanent (DI) in 2 (3%) patients, and one case (1.5%) of panhypopituitarism. Three patients (4.6%) experienced rhinorrhea necessitating reoperation. A serum cortisol level > 5µg/dL on postoperative day 1 was associated with a reduced likelihood of sustained remission. Repeat ETS is a safe and effective treatment option for residual or recurrent CD with satisfactory remission rates and low rates of complications.

Comprehensive analysis of the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Relapse/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL) represents paediatric cancer with a challenging prognosis. CAR T-cell treatment, considered an advanced treatment, remains controversial due to high relapse rates and adverse events. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy for r/r B-ALL. Methods The literature search was performed on four databases. Efficacy parameters included minimal residual disease negative complete remission (MRD-CR) and relapse rate (RR). Safety parameters constituted cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Results Anti-CD22 showed superior efficacy with the highest MRD-CR event rate and lowest RR, compared to anti-CD19. Combining CAR T-cell therapy with haploidentical stem cell transplantation improved RR. Safety-wise, bispecific anti-CD19/22 had the lowest CRS rate, and anti-CD22 showed the fewest ICANS. Analysis of the costimulatory receptors showed that adding CD28ζ to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses with favorable safety profiles. Conclusion Choosing a more efficacious and safer CAR T-cell treatment is crucial for improving overall survival in acute leukaemia. Beyond the promising anti-CD22 CAR T-cell, exploring costimulatory domains and new CD targets could enhance treatment effectiveness for r/r B-ALL.

Overall survival in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with protocol CALGB 9511 at a tertiary hospital in the state of Ceará.

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common neoplasm in childhood and has high survival rates. In adults, due to the biological characteristics of the disease and chemotherapy-related toxicity, survival is lower. CALGB 9511 is a chemotherapy protocol based on pediatric regimens with high remission rates after induction. Objectives: To evaluate the survival of patients with ALL undergoing the CALGB 9511 protocol at Walter Cantídio University Hospital (HUWC); to describe the impact of risk factors: presence of measurable residual disease, BCR-ABL fusion gene status, and allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) on the survival of this group. Methodology: Retrospective evaluation of medical records of patients with ALL treated with this protocol between 2011 and 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival probability. Results: 79 patients were eligible; 19% were BCR-ABL positive; the mean 2-year overall survival was 44%; The 2-year survival rate for patients undergoing HSCT was approximately 78%.. Conclusion: The survival curves of the study conducted at HUWC are similar to those described in the literature and corroborate the severity of the disease. Accessibility to new therapeutic modalities is a strategy that can improve the survival of these patients.

Heat-sensitive moxibustion combined with tropisetron hydrochloride for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled trial

To compare the clinical efficacy of heat-sensitive moxibustion combined with tropisetron hydrochloride and tropisetron hydrochloride alone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Sixty CINV patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 30 cases in each group.The control group was treated with tropisetron hydrochloride. On the basis of the treatment in the control group, heat-sensitive acupoints were explored at Zhongwan (CV 12), Shenque (CV 8), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4), Shangwan (CV 13), Xiawan (CV 10), Jianli (CV 11) and bilateral Zusanli (ST 36), Neiguan (PC 6), Tianshu (ST 25), Liangmen (ST 21) areas in the observation group，and heat-sensitive moxibustion was applied at heat-sensitive acupoints. The treatment started from the day of chemotherapy in both groups, once a day for 7 days. The occurrence and severity of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy were recorded after each treatment on the 1st to 7th days of chemotherapy in the two groups, the complete remission rate was evaluated. The KPS score, quality of life scale score before and after treatment and incidence of myelosuppression were compared between the two groups. On the 2nd to 4th days of chemotherapy, the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), the complete remission rates of nausea and vomiting were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the KPS score in the observation group was higher than those before treatment and in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of emotional function and overall health status in the observation group were higher than those before treatment and in the control group (P<0.05), the scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia, loss of appetite and diarrhea were lower than those before treatment and in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of myelosuppression in the observation group was 20.0% (6/30), which was lower than 46.7% (14/30) in the control group (P<0.05). Heat-sensitive moxibustion combined with tropisetron hydrochloride can effectively reduce nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in patients with malignant tumor, improve the quality of life, relieve the myelosuppression caused by chemotherapy drugs.

Algorithm-based modular psychotherapy vs. cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with depression, psychiatric comorbidities and early trauma: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial.

Effect sizes of psychotherapies currently stagnate at a low-to-moderate level. Personalizing psychotherapy by algorithm-based modular procedures promisesimproved outcomes, greater flexibility, and a better fit between research and practice. However, evidence for the feasibility and efficacy of modular-based psychotherapy, using a personalized treatment algorithm, is lacking. This proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial was conducted in 70 adult outpatients with a primary DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder, a score higher than 18 on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24), at least one comorbid psychiatric diagnosis according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), a history of at least "moderate to severe" childhood maltreatment on at least one domain of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), and exceeding the cut-off value on at least one of three measures of early trauma-related transdiagnostic mechanisms: the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-16 (DERS-16). Patients were randomized to 20 sessions of either standard cognitive-behavioral therapy alone (CBT) or CBT plus transdiagnostic modules according to a mechanism-based treatment algorithm (MoBa), over 16 weeks. We aimed to assess the feasibility of MoBa, and to compare MoBa vs. CBT with respect to participants' and therapists' overall satisfaction and ratings of therapeutic alliance (using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised, WAI-SR), efficacy, impact on early trauma-related transdiagnostic mechanisms, and safety. The primary outcome for efficacy was the HRSD-24 score at post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included, among others, the rate of response (defined as a reduction of the HRSD-24 score by at least 50% from baseline and a score <16 at post-treatment), the rate of remission (defined as a HRSD-24 score ≤8 at post-treatment), and improvements in early trauma-related mechanisms of social threat response, hyperarousal, and social processes/empathy. We found no difficulties in the selection of the transdiagnostic modules in the individual patients, applying the above-mentioned cut-offs, and in the implementation of MoBa. Both participants and therapists reported higher overall satisfaction and had higher WAI-SR ratings with MoBa than CBT. Both approaches led to major reductions of depressive symptoms at post-treatment, with a non-significant superiority of MoBa over CBT. Patients randomized to MoBa were nearly three times as likely to experience remission at the end of therapy (29.4% vs. 11.4%; odds ratio, OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 0.9-11.6). Among mechanism-based outcomes, MoBa patients showed a significantly higher post-treatment effect on social processes/empathy (p<0.05) compared to CBT patients, who presented an exacerbation on this domain at post-treatment. Substantially less adverse events were reported for MoBa compared to CBT. These results suggest the feasibility and acceptability of an algorithm-based modular psychotherapy complementing CBT in depressed patients with psychiatric comorbidities and early trauma. While initial evidence of efficacy was observed, potential clinical advantages and interindividual heterogeneity in treatment outcomes will have to be investigated in fully powered confirmation trials.

Absolute and relative outcomes of psychotherapies for eight mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychotherapies are first-line treatments for most mental disorders, but their absolute outcomes (i.e., response and remission rates) are not well studied, despite the relevance of such information for health care users, providers and policy makers. We aimed to examine absolute and relative outcomes of psychotherapies across eight mental disorders: major depressive disorder (MDD), social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), specific phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and borderline personality disorder (BPD). We used a series of living systematic reviews included in the Metapsy initiative (www.metapsy.org), with a common strategy for literature search, inclusion of studies and extraction of data, and a common format for the analyses. Literature search was conducted in major bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) up to January 1, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing psychotherapies for any of the eight mental disorders, established by a diagnostic interview, with a control group (waitlist, care-as-usual, or pill placebo). We conducted random-effects model pairwise meta-analyses. The main outcome was the absolute rate of response (at least 50% symptom reduction between baseline and post-test) in the treatment and control conditions. Secondary outcomes included the relative risk (RR) of response, and the number needed to treat (NNT). Random-effects meta-analyses of the included 441 trials (33,881 patients) indicated modest response rates for psychotherapies: 0.42 (95% CI: 0.39-0.45) for MDD; 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33-0.43) for PTSD; 0.38 (95% CI: 0.30-0.47) for OCD; 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33-0.43) for panic disorder; 0.36 (95% CI: 0.30-0.42) for GAD; 0.32 (95% CI: 0.29-0.37) for social anxiety disorder; 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23-0.42) for specific phobia; and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15-0.36) for BPD. Most sensitivity analyses broadly supported these findings. The RRs were significant for all disorders, except BPD. Our conclusion is that most psychotherapies for the eight mental disorders are effective compared with control conditions, but absolute response rates are modest. More effective treatments and interventions for those not responding to a first-line treatment are needed.

Evaluation of the effect of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity: multicenter comparative study

IntroductionRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most performed techniques in bariatric surgery. The aim of this study is to compare two surgical procedures in terms of weight loss and the development of comorbidities such as type II diabetes mellitus T2D, arterial hypertension, sleep apnea (OSAS), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).MethodsData from the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR) from 2005 to 2021 were used. 1,392 RYGB and 1,132 SG primary surgery patients were included. Minimum age 18 years; five-year follow-up data available. Tests were performed with a 5% significance level.ResultsLoss of follow-up 95.41% within five years. Five years after surgery, the RYGB showed significant advantages in terms of excess weight loss (%EWL 64.2% vs. 56.9%) and remission rates of the studied comorbidities: hypertension (54.4% vs. 47.8%), OSAS (64.5% vs. 50.1%), and GERD (86.1% vs. 66.9%). Compared to the pre-test, individuals diagnosed with insulin-dependent T2D showed significant improvements with RYGB over a five-year period (remission rate: 75% vs. 63%). In contrast, non-insulin-dependent T2D showed no significant difference between the two approaches (p = 0.125).ConclusionBoth surgical procedures resulted in significant weight loss and improved comorbidities. However, the improvement in comorbidities was significantly greater in patients who underwent RYGB than in those who underwent SG, suggesting that the RYGB technique is preferable.Nevertheless, RYGB requires a high degree of surgical skill. Therefore, acquiring expertise in the technical facets of the surgery is essential to achieving favorable outcomes.

Rates of Recurrent Intestinal Metaplasia and Dysplasia After Successful Endoscopic Therapy of Barrett's Neoplasia by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Ablation: A Large North American Multicenter Cohort.

Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) combining endoscopic resection (ER) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) followed by ablation is the standard of care for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). We have previously shown comparable rates of complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) with both approaches. However, data comparing recurrence after CRIM are lacking. We compared rates of recurrence after CRIM with both techniques in a multicenter cohort. Patients undergoing EET achieving CRIM at 3 academic institutions were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted. Outcomes included rates and predictors of any BE and dysplastic BE recurrence in the 2 groups. Cox-proportional hazards models and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were used for analysis. A total of 621 patients (514 EMR and 107 ESD) achieving CRIM were included in the recurrence analysis. The incidence of any BE (15.7, 5.7 per 100 patient-years) and dysplastic BE recurrence (7.3, 5.3 per 100 patient-years) were comparable in the EMR and ESD groups, respectively. On multivariable analyses, the chances of BE recurrence were not influenced by ER technique (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.49; P = 0.62), which was also confirmed by IPTW analysis (ESD vs EMR: hazard ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.73; P = 0.94). BE length, lesion size, and history of cigarette smoking were independent predictors of BE recurrence. Patients with BE dysplasia/neoplasia achieving CRIM, initially treated with EMR/ablation, had comparable recurrence rates to ESD/ablation. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these outcomes between the 2 ER techniques.

Optimal exposure of mycophenolic acid for induction therapy of childhood lupus nephritis patients: an observational cohort study.

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is recommended for lupus nephritis (LN) treatment, but with large inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK). The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between MPA exposure and disease response and adverse drug reactions in pediatric LN patients. This was a population-based observational cohort study. A total of 86 pediatric LN patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for induction therapy were enrolled. The area-under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated using MPA concentrations according to a limited sampling strategy. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the MPA-AUC threshold values. The cumulative incidence of renal remission and inactive SLE over time was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier's analysis. MPA-AUC was identified as an independent factor associated with renal remission and lupus activity at 6 and 12 months after MMF treatment, and the improved renal remission rates was correlated with higher MPA-AUC, with thresholds of 29.81 and 30.63 μg·h·mL - 1 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Furthermore, the thresholds for maintaining the hypoactive state of LN were 30.96 and 31.19 μg·h·mL - 1at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Patients reaching target thresholds for MPA-AUC achieved renal response or stable disease earlier. In addition, the MPA-AUC threshold for decreasing MMF-related adverse reactions was 50.80 μg·h·mL - 1. The initial and long-term treatments of pediatric LN patients with MMF should be individualized according to the MPA-AUC, and the recommended MPA exposure is 31.19-50.80 μg·h·mL - 1.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and bevacizumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: 98 NSCLC patients who received therapy at Hainan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The 45 patients who received paclitaxel and cisplatin injections were enrolled in a control group while 53 patients who received additional chemotherapy with bevacizumab injection were enrolled in a study group. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were compared before and after treatment. Furthermore, the efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant inter-group difference in VEGF and bFGF levels (p &gt; 0.05) before treatment. There was a significant reduction in VEGF and bFGF levels in the study group compared to control group (p &lt; 0.05). The study group showed a significantly higher total remission rate compared to control group (p &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). Also, age, tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage, metastasis, and smoking history are risk factors that influence patient prognosis. Conclusion: Combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and bevacizumab demonstrates significant efficacy in the treatment of NSCLC. The combination lowers VEGF and bFGF levels without worsening adverse reactions. Future large population studies would be required to obtain a more detailed and comprehensive outcome on this combination in NSCLC.

Place-Based FACT: Treatment Outcomes and Patients' Experience with Integrated Neighborhood-Based Care.

Locating specialized mental healthcare services in the neighborhood of people with severe mental illnesses (SMI) has been suggested as a way of improving treatment outcomes by increasing patient engagement and integration with the local care landscape. The current mixed methods study aimed to examine patient experience and treatment outcomes in three Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams that relocated to the neighborhood they served, compared to seven teams that continued to provide FACT as usual from a central office. Routine Outcome Measurement (ROM) and care use data were analyzed to compare change in treatment outcomes for patients in place-based FACT (n = 255) and FACT as usual (n = 833). Additionally, retrospective in-depth interviews were conducted with twenty patients about their experience with place-based FACT. Quantitative analysis showed mental health admission days decreased more in place-based than FACT as usual, although this difference was small. Both groups showed improved quality of life, psychosocial functioning, and symptomatic remission rates, and decreased unmet and overall needs for care. There was no change over time in met needs for care, employment, and daily activities. Qualitative analysis showed that patients experienced place-based FACT as more accessible, a better safety net, a more personal approach, better integrated with other forms of care, involving their social network, and embedded in their neighborhood and daily environment. This study showed that location and integration matter to patients, and the long term impact of place-based FACT on treatment outcomes should be explored.

Ponatinib vs Imatinib in Frontline Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

In newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease progression due to acquired resistance to first- or second-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is common. Ponatinib inhibits BCR::ABL1 and all single-mutation variants, including T315I. To compare frontline ponatinib vs imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Global registrational, phase 3, open-label trial in adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. From January 2019 to May 2022, eligible patients at 77 sites were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after the cycle 20 phase of the trial. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was August 12, 2022. Patients received ponatinib, 30 mg/d, or imatinib, 600 mg/d, with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after cycle 20. The ponatinib dose was reduced to 15 mg on achievement of minimal residual disease-(MRD) negative complete remission. The primary end point of this interim analysis was MRD-negative complete remission (≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 [MR4] centrally assessed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction), with complete remission maintained for at least 4 weeks at the end of cycle 3. The key secondary end point was event-free survival. Of 245 patients randomized (median age, 54 years; 133 [54.3%] female), 232 (ponatinib, n = 154; imatinib, n = 78) who had p190 or p210 dominant isoforms verified by the central laboratory were analyzed for the primary end point. The MRD-negative complete remission rate (primary end point) was significantly higher with ponatinib (34.4% [53/154]) vs imatinib (16.7% [13/78]) (risk difference, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.29]; P = .002). At the data cutoff, event-free survival had not met the prespecified number of events. Median event-free survival was not reached in the ponatinib group and was 29 months in the imatinib group. The most common adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Arterial occlusive events were infrequent and comparable between groups (ponatinib, 2.5%; imatinib, 1.2%). Ponatinib demonstrated a superior rate of MRD-negative complete remission at the end of induction vs imatinib when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. The safety profile of ponatinib was comparable with imatinib. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03589326.