2I2 Reviews ways inwhich Whig writing was sustained by patronage. Williams could have taken these analyses furtherby establishing with the help of ESTC the actual figures for Whig and Tory publications. However, her position causes problems, as do some of thedetails of her argument. She will persuade few readers thatPordage or Blackmore are asmuch worth reading asDryden or Pope. It isunconvincing to see neglect of cer tainpoets as evidence of anti-Whig bias; no one could argue thatAddison's prose has been neglected, and many of the Whig poems she cites have appeared in the last forty years inPoems onAffairs ofState. It iseasy toproduce examples of neglected Tory or Jacobite poetry: Pope's praise ofGranville inWindsor-Forest has no more saved him forposterity thanAddison's praise ofMontagu. Her use of The Dunciad as evidence is puzzling; it is really too late forher argument, and she ignores the fact thatPope quotes thepraise bestowed on him by Thomson, the greatWhig poet of the century, who has never been 'writtenout'. She also ignores Dryden's praise ofDorset inA Discourse concerningSatire, which she could have set alongside Montagu's. She isun aware of Shaftesbury's hostility, expressed inhisMiscellanies, to the Whig obsession with great houses and gardens. On the religious sublime she should have consulted H. N. Fairchild, Religious Trends inEnglish Poetry, I: I700-I740: Protestantism and theCult of Sentiments (New York: Columbia University Press, I939). Itwould have been helpful if instead of the biographical appendix (all of thewriters are in the ODNB) she had provided a chronological listof all the Whig poems of theperiod. QUEEN MARY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON ISABEL RIVERS Women Writing ofDivinest Things: Rhetoric and thePoetry of Pembroke,Wroth and Lanyer. By LYN BENNETT. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. 2004. x+ 33I pp. $6o. ISBN 978-o-8207-o359-6. The introduction toGermaine Greer's anthology of seventeenth-century women's verse portrays the 'women [. . .]who tried to storm the highest bastion, the citadel of "sacred poetry" [as] [. . .] all guerrilleras, untrained, ill-equipped, isolated and vulnerable' (Kissing theRod, ed. by Germaine Greer and others (London: Virago), p. i). InWomenWriting ofDivinest Things, Lyn Bennett seeks to refute this sweeping statement by asserting that,whatever the situation of their less fortunate sisters, the threewomen whose work she analyses were as well schooled in rhetoric asmost male poets of theperiod, and used thisknowledge to enrich theirwriting. Nor could Mary Sidney, Countess ofPembroke, and her niece,Mary Wroth, be termed 'isolated'; even the less nobly born Aemilia Lanyer was also familiarwith court culture. Bennett shows that these poets undoubtedly had the opportunity to read popular textbooks of rhetoric,but bases most of her claims about theirknowledge on internal evidence. For each of the texts subjected tominute examination (a small selection of Pembroke's Psalmes, Wroth's 'ACrowne of Sonnets' fromPamphilia toAmphilan thus,and a few stanzas fromLanyer's Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum), shemakes a very strong case for thepresence of such rhetorical tropes as 'ploce' (repetition), 'parison' (balance), and 'antimetabole'. This is a circular figurewhere the finalword in a line is a variation of an earlier one, as in 'which scantness dere, and derenes maketh scant' (Pembroke, Psalm 72, 1.54). Bennett succeeds indisplaying the effectof such figures; her discussion of this line, for instance, shows how the linguistically evoked concept of a circle 'dramatizes' the oneness ofGod (pp. 42-43). While modern readers may indeed observe the effects of the language, Bennett's mastery of the vocabulary of rhetoric gives her better access thanmost of us to thepoet's mental universe. Another instance of her approach is the detection of the figure 'syneciosis' (a 'cross coupling' of two contrarywords) in the line 'nor fainte though crosses with my fortunes kiss', from the firstsonnet of Wroth's sequence: MLR, I02. I, 2007 2I3 In a labyrinth, one 'crosses' many paths and, as the speaker has already told us, all of those paths entail suffering.The suffering suggested by 'crosses' is diametrically opposed to the joy implied by 'kiss': in this instance of syneciosis, suffering in love is cross-coupled with the joy one should feel in love. (p. I2 I) The strength ofBennett's book lies in detailed analysis, though readers may some times tend to...