Reliable Videos Research Articles

Evaluating the Adequacy of YouTube Videos for Learning Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is becoming an oncological surgical principle day by day for right hemicolectomy. However, the procedure is technically difficult and carries a higher risk of complications than open surgery. In this study, the adequacy of YouTube videos that facilitate education for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (LRHCME) was investigated. In July 2024, in the search bar of the YouTube platform, the term "laparoscopic right hemicolectomy complete mesocolic excision" was searched. The first 100 videos in each search were evaluated. Animations,advertisements, lectures, non-surgical videos (pre-surgery, post-surgery vlog, etc.), and non-English videoswere excluded from the study. Steps identified in the Delphi consensus were used to determine the reliability of the videos. The quality of the videos was measured using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the modified DISCERN score. Seventy videos were included in the evaluation. While 28 (40%) of these videos were classified as reliable, 42 (60%) were not found reliable. In reliable videos, video description, HD resolution, GQS, modified DISCERN, and duration were significantly higher(p-value <0.001, 0.012, <0.001,<0.001, 0.041 respectively). Reliable videos had a better rank than unreliable videos (p=0.046). When evaluated according to Delphi consensus, the most of LRHCME videos on the YouTube platform were unreliable. We conclude that YouTube alone is insufficient for learning LRHCME without a professional instructor.

Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Gender Dysphoria

Purpose: Many people search for information on YouTube on almost every medical topic. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos concerning Gender Dysphoria. Methods: We searched for Gender Dysphoria on YouTube on June 7, 2023 and conducted a detailed evaluation of the first 100 unique English videos by two expert observers. The videos were evaluated using modified DISCERN scale, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and Video Power Index (VPI). Results: The kappa coefficient for interobserver agreement was 0.892. For all 100 videos, the median value of the modified DISCERN score was 2.5 (1-4.8), and GQS score was 3 (1-5), and 68% of the videos rated as poor to moderate reliability and quality (modified DISCERN score ≤3, GQS ≤3). Reliable videos were uploaded by professional sources in a higher rate than unreliable videos (48% vs 12%, p

Is YouTube a Useful Source of Information on Pressure Injuries? A Content, Reliability, and Quality Analysis.

To evaluate the comprehensiveness, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos related to pressure injuries. The authors searched YouTube for relevant videos using the keywords "pressure injury", "pressure ulcer", "bedsore", "pressure injury etiology", "pressure injury classification", "pressure injury prevention", "pressure injury risk assessment", and "pressure injury management". Of the 1,023 videos screened, 269 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. For each video, the authors recorded the number of views, likes, and comments; the length; and the video upload source. The Comprehensiveness Assessment Tool for Pressure Injuries, the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information score, and the Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the comprehensiveness, reliability, and quality of the videos. The mean length of the 269 videos was 6.22 ± 4.62 minutes (range, 0.18-19.47 minutes). Only 14.5% of the videos (n = 39) were uploaded by universities or professional organizations. Most videos included information about PI prevention (69.5%), followed by PI management (27.9%). The mean comprehensiveness score was 2.33 ± 1.32 (range, 1-5). Nearly half of the videos (49.1%) were not reliable. However, the quality of 43.9% of the videos was somewhat useful. The Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information mean scores of universities/professional organizations (P < .001), nonprofit healthcare professionals (P = .015), and independent health information channel videos (P = .026) were higher than the mean score of medical advertising/profit companies channel videos. This study draws attention to the need for more comprehensive, high-quality, and reliable videos about PIs. It is important that videos on YouTube provide comprehensive and reliable information for patients, caregivers, students, or providers seeking information on PI prevention, assessment, and management.

Is YouTube Reliable to Teach Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass?

The increasing prevalence of obesity has led to the popularity of bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most complex methods in bariatric surgery. The main steps of LRYGB were determined in the Delphi Consensus. This study investigated the instructiveness and reliability of YouTube videos about LRYGB based on the Delphi Consensus. In February 2024, three different searches were done in the search bar of the YouTube platform with the terms "laparoscopic gastric bypass" "laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass" and "laparoscopic RYGB". The first 50 videos in each search were evaluated. Animations, lectures, advertisements, non-English videos, and non-surgical videos (pre-surgery, post-surgery vlog, etc.) were excluded from the study. Delphi consensus steps were used to determine the reliability of the videos. The quality of the videos was measured using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and modified DISCERN test. Forty-five videos were included in the evaluation. While 14 (31.1%) of these videos were classified as reliable, 31 (68.8%) were not found reliable. In reliable videos, video description, high definition (HD) resolution, GQS, and modified DISCERNwere significantly higher(p-value 0.023, 0.004, 0.017, and 0.025 respectively). The rate of unreliable videos was higher on the YouTube platform. We conclude that YouTube alone is insufficient to learn LRYGB.

A Quality and Completeness Assessment of Testicular Cancer Health Information on TikTok

TikTok has become a hub for easily accessible medical information. However, the quality and completeness of this information for testicular cancer has not been examined. Our study aims to assess the quality and completeness of testicular cancer information on TikTok. A search was performed on TikTok using the search terms “Testicular Cancer” and “Testicle Cancer”. Inclusion criteria encompassed videos about testicular cancer in English. We excluded non-English videos, irrelevant videos, and videos without audio. We evaluated these videos using the DISCERN instrument and a completeness assessment. A total of 361 videos were considered for screening and 116 videos were included. Of these, 57 were created by healthcare professionals (HCPs). The median video length was 40 s (5–277 s), with &gt;25 million cumulative views and a median of 446,400 views per video. The average DISCERN score was 29.0 ± 5.7, with HCPs providing higher-quality videos than non-HCPs (30.8 vs. 5.5, p &lt; 0.05). HCPs also had more reliable videos (21.2 vs. 18.1, p &lt; 0.05). Overall quality levels were mostly poor or very poor (97.4%), with none being good or excellent. Most HCP videos were poor (63.2%), whilst many non-HCP videos were very poor (61.0%). The most viewed video had 2,800,000 views but scored a 31 on the DISCERN tool and one on the completeness assessment. The highest DISCERN score had 11,700 views. HCP videos better defined the disease and were more complete (p &lt; 0.05). Most videos discussed self-assessment but were lacking in definitions, risk factors, symptoms, evaluation, management, and outcomes. Most of TikTok’s testicular cancer information lacks quality and completeness, whilst higher-quality videos have limited reach.

Is YouTube a Reliable Online Platform for Scoliosis Exercises?: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective: YouTube is an important platform for sharing information. There is no study that evaluates scoliosis exercise videos on YouTube as technical and content yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and reliability of scoliosis exercises videos on YouTube. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. To access the videos about scoliosis exercise, an online search on Youtube was performed using the term‘’scoliosis exercise’’on the 5th of April,2022. The popularity of videos was assessed with Video Power Index (VPI),the technical and educational quality, and the reliability of videos were measured using the Global Quality Scale(GQS),the Journal of American Medical Association(JAMA) benchmark criteria, and modified DISCERN instrument. Results: Fifty-three exercise videos were included in the study. Twenty-seven videos(50.9%) included general spinal stretching and strengthening exercises, six(11.3%) included Schroth therapy, twelve(22.6%) were yoga exercises, and eight(15.1%) were pilates exercises. When the videos were divided into two groups according to uploaders as medical(n=24) and non-medical professionals(n=29),no significant difference was determined between both groups in terms of the number of likes/dislikes, total/daily views, VPI, and GQS scores(p&gt; 0.05). On the other hand, the JAMA and modified DISCERN instrument scores were found significantly higher in medical professionals (p=0.011,and 0.022, respectively). Also, a significant difference was found in terms of uploader profile(p=0.021), the modified DISCERN(p&lt;0.001),and JAMA scores(p&lt;0.001) between three educational quality levels. Conclusion: The YouTube videos on scoliosis exercises had poor quality.High-quality and reliable videos were mainly sourced from medical professionals.Additionally, the technical characteristics of the videos have not related to the reliability and quality of them.

Evaluation Of Youtube Videos About Teething

Aim: Parents increasingly turn to platforms like YouTube to find information about their infants' health. While health professionals are the primary source of such information, the accessibility of medical content on the internet and the demand for remote healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic have made medical YouTube videos popular. In the field of pediatric dentistry, YouTube offers valuable insights into topics like oral hygiene, early childhood caries, and fluoride use. This study aimed to assess the content and quality of YouTube videos on teething symptoms in infants, identified as a highly searched topic on Google Trends. Methods: Content analysis, DISCERN reliability scoring, and five-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) assessment were conducted on a sample of 46 videos. Results were categorized by uploader gender, video source category, and video quality. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, along with correlation analysis, were performed to identify differences between videos and groups. Results: Among the video uploaders, 80.60% (n=38) were female, and 17.40% (n=8) were male. No statistically significant difference based on gender was found among video uploaders (p&gt;0.05). Most videos were uploaded by non-healthcare professionals, health institutions, workers, and other YouTube channels. Mean view counts, likes, dislikes, and comments were determined for the examined videos. The quality of videos was evaluated using Global Quality Scale and DISCERN ratings, resulting in categorization as weak, moderate, and high quality based on Global Quality Scale scores. Conclusion: This study revealed varying quality in YouTube videos on teething symptoms in infants, with non-healthcare professionals' videos demonstrating lower quality. Nonetheless, reliable videos from pediatric dental experts can serve as valuable resources for parents with limited access to healthcare facilities, particularly during situations like the pandemic. Further research and support are needed in this area.

The Lack of High-quality Educational Resources about Adhesive Capsulitis on YouTube.

Objective The advent of the Internet has provided new, easily accessible resources for patients seeking additional health information. Many doctors and healthcare organizations post informative videos on this platform, and nearly all patients are looking for videos online for a second opinion. Methods The phrases "frozen shoulder," "frozen shoulder treatment," "adhesive" capsulitis, and "adhesive capsulitis treatment" were entered into YouTube's search bar for a normal inquiry. The informativeness and overall quality of the adhesive capsulitis videos were rated using three separate scales. Results The mean and standard deviation values of the scoring systems were JAMA 1.25 ± 0.51, DISCERN 39.4 ± 13.4, GQS 2.83 ± 0.96 and ACSS 7.43 ± 4.86, respectively. Number of views, rate of views, and likes all had a positive correlation with Global Quality Score (GQS), as did DISCERN and ACSS. There was no statistically significant difference between the median JAMA, GQS score and Discern Criteria values according to the video source/uploader (p > 0.05). Conclusion YouTube videos on adhesive capsulitis, thus, need to be of higher quality, reliability, and instructive quality. There is a need for reliable videos about adhesive capsulitis, with instructional and high-quality cited.

Youtube is an unreliable source of information about delayed ejaculation treatment.

Social platforms such as YouTube have become sources of information about diseases as they can be easily and rapidly accessed. However, this also has the risk of ill-intentioned content and misleading information. To evaluate the reliability of YouTube video content about delayed ejaculation treatment. YouTube videos were searched using the terms "delayed ejaculation," "retarded ejaculation," "inhibited ejaculation," and "anejaculation." Videos were excluded if they were not in English, were not related to the subject, or did not have audio and visual content. In accordance with the scientifically proven accurate information, the videos were separated as reliable (Group 2, n: 112) and unreliable videos (Group 1, n: 94). The groups were compared in respect of the video characteristics, and the scores obtained in the DISCERN-5, Global Quality Scale, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool Audiovisual, and the Journal of the American Medical Association scales. Intraclass correlation test was used to evaluate the level of agreement between the two investigators. Of the 1200 videos, 994 were excluded. No significant difference was determined between the Group 1 and Group 2 in respect of the median number of views [1672 (4555) vs 1547 (28,559), p = 0.63] and likes [10 (42) vs 17 (255), p = 0.07]. There was a greater number of videos in the Group 2 (54.4%) and the points obtained on the scoring scales were significantly higher than the Group 1 (p < 0.001). The videos originating from universities/professional organizations/non-profit physician/physician group were comprised the majority of the reliable videos (55.3%) and the unreliable videos had more content related to treatment (71.4%) (p < 0.001). Although there was a greater number of reliable videos related to the problem of delayed ejaculation, the content could be misleading and should be avoided by patients seeking treatment without consulting a physician.

Quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on pulmonary rehabilitation

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the quality and reliability of the most watched YouTube videos in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and to determine the criteria that may be important in the selection of high quality and reliable videos by patients and their relatives. Methods: We searched for the keywords “pulmonary exercise,” “pulmonary rehabilitation,” and “pulmonary physiotherapy” on December 12th, 2021. Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) and Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to assess the quality and reliability of the videos. Results: Of the 150 videos screened and 76 (50.7%) videos were identified for inclusion. The median mDISCERN score was 2, indicating that most of the videos were of low quality. A statistically significant relationship was found between video reliability classification in terms of video duration, time since upload, number of subscribers, and number of likes (p &amp;lt; 0.05). In addition, in terms of video upload source, it was determined that most of the high reliability videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals and most of the low reliability videos were uploaded by independent users (p &amp;lt; 0.05). When the videos were compared according to the quality groups subcategory, significant differences were detected in video duration, number of subscribers, average number of views per day, upload sources and mDISCERN scores (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusions: According to the current study results, most of the PR-related videos on YouTube were found to be of poor quality and low reliability. Sharing more videos on social platforms by healthcare professionals in the future may be effective in increasing video quality and reliability.

Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

YouTube plays an influential role in disseminating health-related information in the digital age. This study aimed to evaluate YouTube videos on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in terms of their information value and quality. In this descriptive study, we ranked the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria using the search term "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation" on October 30, 2022. These videos were classified according to the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, duration, popularity and content categories. Reliability, quality, and accuracy of the videos were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and Modified DISCERN Questionnaire and Global Quality Score (GQS). Video popularity were calculated by the Video Power Index (VPI). Based on the GQS results, we found that 59, 27, and 14 videos had low, intermediate, and high quality, respectively. In addition, based on the JAMA results, 79 and 21 videos had poor and high reliability, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the JAMA, modified DISCERN and GQS scores in terms of the sources of videos (p=0.226, p=0.115, p=0.812). Notably, there was a weak positive correlation between the JAMA scores and the number of views (r=0.204, p=0.041). According to our study results, most YouTube videos on TENS were of low quality and reliability. Additionally, most videos were uploaded from sources created by doctors; the most frequently found content was about the TENS procedure, and content on complications of the procedure became less frequent as the videos became more recent. In particular, it was found that videos uploaded by academics have longer duration. It has been found that reliable videos with high JAMA scores also have high number of views. Accordingly, it can be concluded that videos with higher quality and more reliability that are created by healthcare providers will be more useful for patients seeking information about TENS.

(238) TikTok as a Source of Information Regarding Premature Ejaculation: a Qualitative Assessment

Abstract Introduction Patients are increasingly looking to social media platforms for sources of medical information. TikTok is one of the newest social media platforms primarily geared towards younger audiences. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the quality of information regarding premature ejaculation (PE) on TikTok. Methods The term “premature ejaculation” was searched on TikTok in May 2022. The first 40 top videos that met inclusion criteria were included. Videos were sorted as reliable or unreliable based on accuracy of video content by three reviewers. Relevant user metrics were collected for each video, including: number of likes, shares, followers of user, video length, source of upload and speaker type. Quality of information was numerically evaluated using Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and 5-point modified DISCERN validated tools with mean scores obtained from the three reviewers. Results Eight videos were categorized as reliable and 32 videos were categorized as unreliable. Mean number of “likes” per video was higher in the reliable versus unreliable group (1,238 vs. 126, p &amp;lt; 0.018). Accounts posting reliable videos had higher mean number of followers versus unreliable (55,050 vs. 12,042, p = 0.025). The majority of unreliable videos (75%) were posted by self-identified patients or individual users versus 12.5% of reliable videos. 62.5% of reliable videos were posted by individual physicians or physician groups, versus 6.3% of unreliable videos. Few overall videos mentioned indications for PE treatment, types of treatment, or value of psychological intervention (12.5%, 15%, 22.5% and 5.0% respectively.) Video length and number of shares did not differ between groups. Reliable videos had a higher DISCERN (2.7 vs. 0, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and PEMAT (73.0 v. 45.1, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions Quality of information regarding premature ejaculation on TikTok is low with a significant percentage of videos on this topic fraught with inaccurate information. Given TikTok’s prominence as a social media platform primarily geared towards younger audiences, we emphasize a need for improvement in the quality of information available regarding premature ejaculation and its management. Disclosure No

The Evaluation of YouTube™ Videos Pertaining to Intraoperative Anaesthesia Awareness: A Reliability and Quality Analysis.

Aim The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube™ (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA) videos pertaining to anaesthesia awareness. Methods We evaluated the most commonly viewed 100 videos pertaining to anaesthesia awareness. The YouTube™videos' image type, qualification of the uploaders, video content, video length in minutes, upload time, time since upload, total view count, daily view count and comment and like counts were recorded. The quality of the YouTube™videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the reliability was determined using the modified DISCERN scale. Results Of all videos, 34 (34%) were uploaded directly by physicians, 16 (16%) by patients, 14 (14%) by health channels, 13 (13%) by TV shows and 23 (23%) by others.The mean video length was 11.48±11.96 minutes. The average DISCERN score was 4.47±0.58 in the professional and 3.28±0.65 in the non-professional video group (p<0.001). The mean GQS score was 4.47±0.52 in the professionaland 3.35±0.67 in the non-professional video group (p<0.001). Conclusion The results of this study indicate that a significant portion of the YouTube™videos pertaining to anaesthesia awareness were uploaded directly by physicians or by health channels. Physicians and professional health institutions should be promoted to provide accurate andmore reliable videos to direct patients to the right solutions for their problems. YouTube™videos should be subjected to supervision before they can be publicly viewed.

TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment.

Patients are increasingly looking to social media platforms for medical information. In this study we aimed to evaluate the quality of information regarding premature ejaculation (PE) on TikTok. The term "premature ejaculation" was searched on TikTok on a single day in May 2022. Videos were sorted by 3 reviewers as reliable or unreliable based on the accuracy of video content. Relevant user metrics were collected for each video, including the numbers of likes, shares, and followers, and the video length, source of upload, and speaker type. The quality of information was objectified with 2 validated tools, with mean scores obtained from the 3 reviewers, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and the 5-point modified DISCERN instrument. Outcomes were video reliability categorization, video and user metrics as described above, and video quality as quantified by PEMAT and DISCERN scores. Eight videos were categorized as reliable and 32 videos were categorized as unreliable. The mean number of "likes" per video was higher in the reliable than in the unreliable group (1238 vs 126, P < .018). Accounts posting reliable videos had higher mean numbers of followers than those posting unreliable videos (55 050 vs 12 042, P = .025). The majority of unreliable videos (75%) vs reliable videos (12.5%) were posted by self-identified patients or individual users, whereas 62.5% of reliable videos vs versus 6.3% of unreliable videos were posted by individual physicians or physician groups. Few videos overall mentioned PE definition, indications for PE treatment, types of treatment, or value of psychological intervention (12.5%, 15%, 22.5%, and 5.0% of videos, respectively). Video length and number of shares did not differ between groups. Reliable videos had higher PEMAT (73.0 vs 45.1, P < .001) and DISCERN (2.7 vs 0, P < .001.) scores. There exists a critical need for enhanced quality of medical information on social media platforms in hopes of encouraging patients with impaired sexual function to seek appropriate medical care. Strengths of this study include the objective use of validated quality assessment tools and a focus on TikTok as an emerging social media platform. Limitations include large numbers of excluded videos. The quality of available information regarding PE on TikTok is low, with a significant percentage of videos on this topic fraught with inaccuracies. Given TikTok's prominence as a social media platform primarily geared toward younger audiences, we emphasize the need for improvement in the quality of information available regarding PE and its management.

Assessment of reliability and information quality of YouTube videos about root canal treatment after 2016

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess and update the content, reliability, and information quality of content related to root canal treatment (RCTx) on YouTube and evaluate the correlation between each evaluation index.MethodsYouTube was searched using two terms related to RCTx (“root canal and endodontic treatment”). A total of 240 videos (120 for each search term) were screened. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no sound or visuals, non-English, irrelevant to the search term, longer than 15 min, duplicate, or old (uploaded before 2016). After exclusion, 50 videos of “root canal treatment” and 45 videos of “endodontic treatment” were analyzed. Video length, total number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and days since upload were recorded using descriptive video data. Viewers’ interaction, reliability and information quality of the video, and quality of video content were measured using nondescriptive video data. The interaction index and video power index were used for viewer interactions, and the modified DISCERN index, JAMA criteria, and Global Quality Score were used to assess the reliability and information quality of the video. The quality of the video content was measured using the completeness score.ResultsThe videos of the “root canal treatment” group had a significantly higher completeness score for the etiology and symptoms (p < 0.05), and videos of the “endodontic treatment” group showed a higher interaction index, completeness score for the procedure (p < 0.05). Videos for dentists had significantly higher completeness scores for the procedure, while videos for laypersons had higher completeness scores for etiology, anatomy, symptoms, and prognosis (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the total completeness score and the interaction index of the videos for laypersons were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The videos uploaded by the university had a significantly higher modified DISCERN index (p = 0.044), and the JAMA score was significantly higher in the commercial group (p = 0.001).ConclusionsAlthough the accuracy of videos related to RCTx was higher in videos by universities and professionals, the total completeness of YouTube videos was low regardless of the video source. Therefore, professionals should be responsible for providing more accurate and reliable videos.

Reliability and accuracy of varicocoele videos in YouTube.

To evaluate the scientific impact of videos about varicocoele on YouTube. A cross-sectional study was conducted at Turkey in September 2020, and comprised YouTube videos related to varicocoele. The videos were divided into 2 groups according to their reliability and accuracy using the European Association of Urology Sexual and Reproductive Guidelines 2020. A 5-point modified reliability (DISCERN) tool, Global Quality Score, and Journal of the American Medical Association scores of each video were calculated. The user's engagements by total views, video-related comments, and "likes" and "dislikes" to the videos were compared. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 151 videos assessed, 73(48.34%) were included; 36(49.3%) reliable and 37(50.7%) unreliable. All scores were significantly higher for reliable videos (p<0.05). The mean number of views was 108448±90567 for reliable and 392626±895897 for unreliable videos (p=0.044). The rates of "likes" and "dislikes" were similar between the groups, whereas the comment rate was significantly higher for reliable videos (p<0.05). Most of the videos 40(54.8%) were uploaded by medical advertisements or for-profit companies, while those uploaded by universities or professional organisations were 19(26%). Nearly half of the varicocoele-related videos on YouTube were unreliable, and the reliability of videos was not directly related to their popularity.

YouTube as a platform to better understand the treatment of lymphoma using ibrutinib: a cross-sectional study.

BackgroundIbrutinib, one Food and Drug Administration-approved, orally available, small-molecule Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is an effective targeted therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). YouTube is increasingly used for health purposes. However, videos for ibrutinib on YouTube have not been previously evaluated. This study assessed the accuracy and quality of YouTube videos on ibrutinib, to better understand the information shown on a dominant media platform.MethodsThe first 150 video results returned by the YouTube search engine in response to the keyword “ibrutinib” were included (up to June 27, 2022). Typically used predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen the videos based on our needs. A 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) determined whether the videos would be useful to patients or not, and the quality of content was analyzed by five content-specific items. The quality of the included videos was classified as “low”, “moderate”, or “excellent” according to GQS and content score. The median and interquartile range were used to describe the values and Kruskal-Wallis test were used in the analysis.ResultsA total of 99 videos with a median of 237 views met the inclusion criteria. The videos were categorized into educational videos (n=6, 6.07%), personal experience and blog (n=3, 3.03%) and interviews videos (n=90, 90.9%). Almost half of the videos were classified as moderate (n=51, 51.51%), followed by excellent (n=25, 25.26%) and low (n=23, 23.23%). Between the groups, no statistically significant differences were observed in the numbers of dislikes, comments, posted days, percentage positivity and viewing rate (P>0.05). There were marked differences in the length, likes, views, viewers’ interaction and likeability (P<0.05).ConclusionsYouTube could be an effective source for different groups of people to obtain helpful information about ibrutinib. The physicians, pharmacists, nurses and healthcare organizations should prepare and upload more comprehensible and reliable videos with evidence-based information.

YouTube as a source of information on piriformis syndrome exercises.

This study aimed to evaluate the quality and reliability of the most viewed YouTube videos on piriformis syndrome (PS) exercises and identify criteria that may be important for selecting high-quality and reliable videos. We searched for the keywords "piriformis syndrome exercise," "piriformis syndrome rehabilitation," "piriformis syndrome physical therapy," and "piriformis syndrome physiotherapy" on November 28, 2021. The modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and the Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the videos. Of the 92 videos evaluated, most (58.7%) of the videos were shared by healthcare professionals. The median mDISCERN score was 3, and most of the videos were found to be medium or low quality. Videos with more subscribers (p=0.001), a shorter upload duration (p=0.001), videos uploaded by physicians (p=0.004), and videos uploaded by other healthcare professionals (p=0.001) were found to have high reliability. Conversely, videos uploaded by independent users were found to have low reliability (p<0.001). When the parameters of the videos were compared among the quality groups, significant differences were found in all video features (p<0.05), some upload sources (other healthcare professionals and independent users; p=0.001), and mDISCERN scores (p<0.001). It is beneficial for physicians and other health professionals to upload more videos about health to increase the amount of reliable and high-quality information.

Analysis of the most viewed Hindi YouTube videos on breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Social media channels are a significant source of health information including breast cancer. YouTube has a broad range of educational materials on various health issues in many languages. However, the accuracy of these videos is contentious. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of the most viewed Hindi videos on YouTube related to breast cancer. On YouTube, the "Breast Cancer-Hindi" term was searched for the 50 most viewed Hindi videos. To evaluate the videos' quality and reliability, global quality scores (GQS) and DISCERN (quality criteria for the assessment of written health information), and for credibility and usefulness Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) tool were used. Popularity was measured using a video power index (VPI). Comparisons of scores were made between professionals' and consumers' videos. Two health researchers independently rated the videos and their correlation was calculated for agreement. Of all the 50 videos viewed, 23 (46%) each were uploaded by consumers and professionals. GQS median 3 (1-5), DISCERN median 13 (5-23), JAMA median 2 (0.50-4), and VPI median 90.7 (50-96.93) were reported. All scores of professionals were higher than consumers at a significant level ( P < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between both observers ( P < 0.01). YouTube has some good quality and reliable videos on breast cancer in the Hindi language. These videos are mostly of professionals in comparison with consumers with wide viewership. However, they are limited in numbers; therefore, health professionals should upload more videos with accurate information to spread awareness about breast cancer.

Quality and content of online cancer information: An analysis of NCI-designated cancer center YouTube videos.

11041 Background: The internet and social media have become a common source of medical information. Previous analyses have found that YouTube videos disseminate biased cancer related information of low to moderate quality. We analyzed online information disseminated by NCI-designated Cancer Centers (CC) through their YouTube pages. Methods: We searched CC websites and online search engines to identify CC-specific YouTube pages. Our sample included each CC’s top 20 most-viewed videos uploaded during 2019, which were &lt; 5 minutes long, and available in English or Spanish. We examined video content themes and speaker demographics. For patient education videos, we evaluated content understandability and quality of information using validated measures [i.e., Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and DISCERN]. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 31 of 64 clinical NCI-designated CC had dedicated YouTube pages. Only 6 (19%) CC had videos in languages other than English. A total of 402 videos were examined for content themes and demographic characteristics. 43% focused on patient education (n = 175), 36% research (n = 139), 24% survivorship (n = 95), and 13% clinical trials (n = 52). 32% (n = 119) of speakers were doctors and 18% (n = 65) patients. Perceived speakers’ ethnicity was 57% White (n = 229), followed by Asian (15%, n = 60), Black or African American (8%, n = 32), and Latinx (4%, n = 16). Perceived gender of speakers was 49% women (n = 197) and 51% men (n = 203). Most videos were understandable (91%, n = 159), but only 21% (n = 36) provided high quality information. Videos discussing treatments lacked discussion of risks, alternate options, and effects on quality of life. Conclusions: Most patient education videos uploaded to NCI-designated CC YouTube pages have low to moderate quality information and limited ethnic diversity of speakers. With ongoing trends of increasing misinformation spreading through social media, CC have an opportunity to create and disseminate high-quality, reliable, and comprehensive educational videos that meet the informational needs of patients with cancer and their caregivers.[Table: see text]