A key aspect of any future battery technology development is safety. Although lithium-based batteries are ubiquitous, there are still challenges related to their energy density, cycle life, cost and safety. In regard to safety, compared with organic electrolyte, aqueous rechargeable batteries may provide a safer alternative for reliable, low-cost and large-scale energy storage systems. As seen from the penetration test in Fig. 1a-1b, the battery with organic electrolyte catches fire, yet the battery with aqueous electrolyte is relatively safe. Moreover, aqueous batteries have high ion conductivity and cost effectiveness. Generally, the cell voltage and energy density of aqueous batteries are lower than those of organic-based batteries (e.g. Li-ion) because of the relatively smaller electrochemical stability window of water. Among all the metals that are stable in water, zinc is the most active and has the lowest possible operating potential. This means using Zn anode can increase overall cell voltage of aqueous batteries. Moreover, zinc is globally available, inexpensive (3.19 USD kg-1), and has high capacity (820 Ah kg-1 and 5854 Ah L-1). Zinc-based aqueous batteries also possess the stability to be operated in ambient air. Accordingly, Zn aqueous rechargeable batteries are promising to become a safer energy storage system. Among zinc-based aqueous batteries, Zn-air batteries have high theoretical volumetric energy density, which is around three times that of conventional Li-ion batteries (LIB). Zn anodes have been investigated in neutral/mild acidic aqueous electrolytes. Yet in order to pair them with oxygen cathode to reach the highest energy density, alkaline aqueous electrolyte is ideal, in which the oxygen electrode has low polarization. In alkaline aqueous electrolyte, Zn anode undergoes a Zn (s) ↔ Zn(OH)4 2- (aq) ↔ ZnO (s) conversion. This solid-solute-solid transformation and insulating discharge product ZnO lead to three vital challenges: 1) ZnO passivates Zn surface and prevents further discharging, leading to low Zn utilization; 2) ZnO is insulating and can hardly be charged back to Zn; 3) diffusion of Zn(OH)4 2- causes the loss of active material and change of electrode morphology. Thus, anode modification and protection are needed to alleviate the passivation and dissolution. We firstly designed a Zn mesh@GO anode (Fig 1c). Graphene oxide (GO) layers on the Zn mesh surface deliver electrons across insulating ZnO and can slow down the Zn dissolution. However, the utilization of zinc is still low because passivation problem is not completely solved. Through SEM investigation, critical passivation size was found to be ~ 2 µm. Thus, we further designed a lasagna-inspired ZnO@GO anode (Fig 1d). ZnO nanoparticles are encapsulated by GO. ZnO lasagna structure has three features: 1) the size of ZnO nanoparticles is smaller than the critical size of passivation; 2) the fabrication of ZnO lasagna anode starts with commercially available ZnO nanoparticles (~100 nm), and is compatible with the roll-to-roll process, which is ideal for large-scale manufacturing; 3) GO allows permeation of OH- and water, and prevents loss of Zn active material through blocking bigger Zn(OH)4 2-. As a result, such lasagna anode achieves a high volumetric capacity of 2308 Ah/L and a remarkable capacity retention of 86% after 150 cycles. In contrast, the open-structured ZnO nanoparticle anode, without the protection of GO, completely died after 90 cycles. Figure 1