Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Research Articles

Short-term surgical outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: A comparative, single-center, retrospective study.

Although laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) are gradually gaining popularity, their advantages over open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of OPD, LPD, and RPD to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. We retrospectively analyzed 16 LPD, 43 RPD, and 36 OPD procedures performed at a single center between April 2020 and May 2024. Clinical data, including operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RPD demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (553 min) than OPD (446 min) and LPD (453 min) but a significantly lower estimated blood loss than OPD (150 mL vs. 400 mL, p < .001). Postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) were lower for RPD (24.4%) than those for OPD (50.0%) and LPD (68.8%). RPD also showed a significantly lower rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (14.6% vs. 38.9% for OPD and 43.8% for LPD) and a shorter duration of hospitalization (11 vs. 28 days for OPD and 21 days for LPD, p < .001). Hospitalization costs were higher for RPD (20 109 USD) than for OPD (18 487 USD, p < .001), with LPD (20 496 USD) and RPD costs being similar. RPD appears to offer advantages in terms of reduced blood loss and postoperative complications and shortened hospital stay despite longer operative times and higher hospitalization costs. Therefore, RPD may be a more beneficial approach than OPD or LPD in pancreatic surgery.

Intraoperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion Has No Impact on Postoperative Short-Term Outcomes After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Malignancies: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis and Mediation Analysis

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between intraoperative blood transfusion (BT) and the short-term outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with periampullary malignancies. Methods: In a retrospective two-center cohort analysis, we utilized a logistic and mixed-effects ordinal regression, nonparametric partial correlation, and mediation analysis, complemented by propensity score matching (PSM) and weighting. Results: A total of 491 patients were included. Of these, 18 (3.7%) received an intraoperative BT. An intraoperative BT was associated with blood loss (odds ratio (OR) per 100 mL = 1.42; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.62; p &lt; 0.001) and relatively high ASA classes (OR = 3.75; 95% CI 1.05 to 17.74; p = 0.041). Intraoperative blood loss (r = 0.27; p &lt; 0.001) but not intraoperative BT (r = 0.015; p = 0.698) was associated with postoperative complications. Intraoperative BT was associated with postoperative complications according to the unadjusted regression (OR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.38–2.42, p &lt; 0.001) but not the multivariable ordinal regression. In the mediation analysis for relative risk (RR), intraoperative BT was beneficial (RR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.01–0.78), and blood loss (RR = 2.49; 95% CI: 1.75–177.34) contributed to the occurrence of major postoperative complications. After PSM, analyses revealed that an intraoperative BT did not have a significant impact on the rates of postoperative major complications (OR = 1.048; p = 0.919), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR = 0.573; p = 0.439) or postoperative 90-day mortality (OR = 0.714; p = 0.439). Conclusions: When adjusting for intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative BT is not associated with postoperative complications.

Italian survey about intraperitoneal drain use in distal pancreatectomy.

Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is still controversial. A survey was carried out through the Italian community of pancreatic surgeons using institutional emails, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP) and the Italian Association of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery (AICEP). The survey was structured to learn surgeons' practice in using IPD through questions and one clinical vignette. Respondents were asked to report their regrets for omission and commission regarding the IPD use for the clinical scenario, eliciting a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were built to identify respondents' attitudes. One hundred six surgeons completed the survey. Sixty-three (59.4%) respondents confirmed using at least 1 drain, while 43 (40.6%) placed 2 IPDs. Only 13 respondents (12.3%) declared a change in IPD strategy in patients at high risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), while 9 (9.4%) respondents changed their strategy in low-risk POPF situations. Thirty-five (35.5%) respondents declared they would remove the IPD within the third postoperative day (POD) in the absence of CR-POPF suspicion. The median omission regret, which proved to be the wrong decision, was 80 (50-100, IQR). The median regret due to the commission of IPD, which turned out to be useless, was 2.5 (1-20, IQR). The CR-POPF probability threshold at which drainage omission was the less regrettable choice was 7% (1-35, IQR). The threshold to perceive drain omission as the least regrettable choice was higher in female surgeons (P < 0.001), in surgeons who modulated the strategies based on the risk of CR-POPF, and in high volume centers (p = 0.039). The threshold was lower in surgeons who performed minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (P < 0.001), adopted a closed system (P < 0.001), placed two IPDs (P < 0.001), or perceived the IPD as important to prevent reintervention (p = 0.047). Drain management after DP remains very heterogeneous among surgeons. The regret model suggested that IPD omission could be performed in low-risk patients (7% of CR-POPF), leading to low regret in the case of the wrong decision, making it an acceptable clinical decision.

Construction and verification of pancreatic fistula risk prediction model after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on ensemble machine learning

Objective: To construct an ensemble machine learning model for predicting the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy and evaluate its application value. Methods: This is a research on predictive model. Clinical data of 421 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Pancreatic Surgery,Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology from June 2020 to May 2023 were retrospectively collected. There were 241 males (57.2%) and 180 females (42.8%) with an age of (59.7±11.0)years (range: 12 to 85 years).The research objects were divided into training set (315 cases) and test set (106 cases) by stratified random sampling in the ratio of 3∶1. Recursive feature elimination is used to screen features,nine machine learning algorithms are used to model,three groups of models with better fitting ability are selected,and the ensemble model was constructed by Stacking algorithm for model fusion. The model performance was evaluated by various indexes,and the interpretability of the optimal model was analyzed by Shapley Additive Explanations(SHAP) method. The patients in the test set were divided into different risk groups according to the prediction probability (P) of the alternative pancreatic fistula risk score system (a-FRS). The a-FRS score was validated and the predictive efficacy of the model was compared. Results: Among 421 patients,CR-POPF occurred in 84 cases (20.0%). In the test set,the Stacking ensemble model performs best,with the area under the curve (AUC) of the subject's work characteristic curve being 0.823,the accuracy being 0.83,the F1 score being 0.63,and the Brier score being 0.097. SHAP summary map showed that the top 9 factors affecting CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy were pancreatic duct diameter,CT value ratio,postoperative serum amylase,IL-6,body mass index,operative time,albumin difference before and after surgery,procalcitonin and IL-10. The effects of each feature on the occurrence of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy showed a complex nonlinear relationship. The risk of CR-POPF increased when pancreatic duct diameter<3.5 mm,CT value ratio<0.95,postoperative serum amylase concentration>150 U/L,IL-6 level>280 ng/L,operative time>350 minutes,and albumin decreased by more than 10 g/L. The AUC of a-FRS in the test set was 0.668,and the prediction performance of a-FRS was lower than that of the Stacking ensemble machine learning model. Conclusion: The ensemble machine learning model constructed in this study can predict the occurrence of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy,and has the potential to be a tool for personalized diagnosis and treatment after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage during pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Prophylactic abdominal drainage during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a common treatment strategy for pancreatic fistula. However, its benefits and safety have been the subject of debate. The objective of this meta-analysis and system review is to assess the effects of prophylactic drainage, various types of drainage (active and passive), and the timing of drainage removal (early and late) on the postoperative outcomes of PD. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases as of April 28, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic abdominal drainage, different drainage patterns, and the timing of drainage removal after PD were included, and the postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to aggregate dichotomous outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed- and random-effects models. Results: Nine RCTs, including a total of 1638 patients, were incorporated in our study. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the closed-suction drain (CSD) group and the passive drain to gravity (PDG) group. Compared to the late drain removal (LDR) group, the early drain removal (EDR) group had a significant reduction in the incidence of Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) (OR=0.39, 95% CI=0.20 to 0.79; P=0.009), morbidity (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.20 to 0.84; P=0.01) and intra-abdominal infection (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.22 to 0.75; P=0.004). For the group of present of drainage and the group of absent of drainage, the patient inclusion criteria of the included studies were too heterogeneous, making meta-analysis inappropriate. Conclusion: The existing evidence is insufficient to negate the necessity of prophylactic drainage after PD. The meta-analysis did not show superiority of any specific approaches of drainage tube. But this review did indicate that patients benefit from EDR in terms of CR-POPF, morbidity and intra-abdominal infection. EDR was recommended for low/intermediate risk patients.

Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: a comparative propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes

IntroductionCompared to open pancreaticoduodenectomies (OPD), the robotic (RPD) approach improves the rate of complication and the length of stay. However, it remains unknown if these benefits persist in octogenarians, who are at higher risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database was performed to identify patients aged 80 years or older who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2015 and 2021. Patients who underwent RPD or OPD were compared using inversed probability weighting of the propensity score to control for known confounding variables. Outcomes assessed include operative time, length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge, major complications, unplanned readmission, return to the operating room (OR), mortality, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CRPOPF). ResultsOf 30,751 patients undergoing PD, 1720 were 80 or older. One thousand six hundred twenty-five patients (94 %) underwent OPD, and 95 (6 %) underwent RPD. RPD was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of major complications (32.6 % vs. 45.6 % in OPD; p < 0.01) and a lower rate of non-home discharge (24.7 % vs. 34.3 % in OPD; p < 0.05). However, RPD was associated with a longer operative time (438 min vs. 342 min for OPD; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in other assessed outcomes between the two groups. ConclusionRPD may reduce major postoperative complications and non-home discharges compared to the open approach for octogenarians.

Preoperative risk-stratified analysis: External versus internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundSeveral risk-stratified studies have compared the outcomes of external and internal pancreatic stents in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but no resolute standard for a fistula-mitigation strategy exists. The study investigated the efficacy of these stents in a preoperative risk-stratified setting. MethodsData from 285 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy using an external or internal stent from 2015 to 2023 were analyzed. The preoperative pancreatic fistula score (preFRS) was used to classify patients into low-risk (preFRS: 0–5) and high-risk (preFRS: 6–8) groups. ResultsPreFRS accurately predicted the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) as 0% and >40% in patients with preFRS ≤1 and ≥7, respectively. Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients, the external stent significantly reduced CR-POPF (21% vs 44%, P = .024) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH, 0% vs 19%, P = .02) in high-risk patients, leading to the superiority of the external stent in the entire cohort in terms of CR-POPF (12% vs 24%, P = .033) and PPH (1% vs 11%, P = .013). There were no significant differences in stent-related complications or pancreatic dysfunction. External stent malfunction occurred in 14% and significantly affected CR-POPF development in both low- (20% vs 0%, P < .01) and high-risk groups (60% vs 14%, P = .021). ConclusionThe external pancreatic stent showed a more beneficial effect on CR-POPF and PPH, especially in high-risk patients, without increasing other complications. Risk-stratified strategy and improving stent management might enhance postoperative outcomes.

Computed tomography-based radiomics and body composition analysis for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Preoperative risk assessment of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is still lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a combined model based on radiomics, pancreatic duct diameter, and body composition analysis for the prediction of CR-POPF in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a combined model in conjunction with radiomics score (Rad-score), pancreatic duct diameter, and visceral fat area/total abdominal muscle area index (VFA/TAMAI). The models were internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. The predictive performance of these models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The preoperative combined model was validated by 1,000 bootstrap resampling with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.839 (95% confidence interval: 0.757-0.907). The calibration curves and DCA showed that the combined model outperformed the clinical model and radiomics model. The combined model was presented as a web-based calculator (https://whyyjyljz.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/). We explored a method of combining radiomics features, pancreatic duct diameter, and body composition analysis predictors in preoperative assessment for risk of CR-POPF and developed a combined model that showed relatively good performance, but future studies with a larger sample size are needed to verify the stability and generalizability of this model.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and totally laparoscopic PD after overcoming learning curves with comparison of oncologic outcomes between open PD and minimally invasive PD.

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), such as totally laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (TLPD) or robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RAPD), is increasingly performed worldwide. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of TLPD and RAPD, and compare the oncologic outcomes between MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for malignant disease. This retrospective study was conducted at two hospitals that followed similar oncological surgical principles, including the extent of resection. RAPD was performed at Seoul National University Hospital, and TLPD at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to compare oncologic outcomes between MIPD and OPD. Between 2015 and 2020, 332 RAPD and 178 TLPD were performed. The rates of Clavian-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (19.3% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.816), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (9.9% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.647), and open conversions (6.6% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.163) were comparable between the two groups. The mean operation time (341 minutes vs. 414 minutes, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the RAPD group (11 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.034). After PSM, the 5-year overall survival rate was comparable between MIPD and OPD for overall malignant disease (58.4% vs. 55.5%, p = 0.180). Both RAPD and TLPD are safe and feasible, and MIPD has clinical outcomes that are comparable to those of OPD. Although RAPD exhibits some advantages, its perioperative outcomes are similar to those associated with TLPD. A surgical method may be selected based on the convenience of surgical movements, medical costs, and operator experience.

Powered stapler and polyglycolic acid sheet for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundAlthough distal pancreatectomy (DP) is crucial for the treatment of pancreatic diseases, it often leads to postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), a complication with significant management challenges and health effects. Despite the use of various techniques, including suturing methods, staplers, and biodegradable materials, the optimal strategy to reduce POPF remains unclear. This study investigated the combined use of powered staplers and polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets to mitigate POPF. MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the data of 165 patients who underwent DP at Sapporo Medical University Hospital between January 2013 and August 2023. This study compared the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) between patients treated without (group O, n = 50) and with powered staplers and PGA sheets (group P, n = 115). In addition, the surgical techniques, patient demographics, and postoperative outcomes were examined. ResultsThis study found no significant difference in the overall incidence of POPF between the groups. However, group P had a significantly lower incidence of CR-POPF than group O (20.9% vs 40.0%, respectively; P = .011). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.81; 95% CI, 1.26–6.26; P = .012) and pancreatic thickness of more than 14 mm (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.17–6.95; P = .021) were independent risk factors for CR-POPF. The use of powered staplers and PGA sheets (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.85; P = .017) was associated with reduced CR-POPF risk. ConclusionThe combined use of powered staplers and PGA sheets can significantly decrease the incidence of CR-POPF in patients with DP.

Clinical outcomes of preservation versus resection of portal/superior mesenteric vein during pancreaticoduodenectomy in pancreatic cancer patients who respond to neoadjuvant treatment: A retrospective cohort study

Background: R0 rates have increased as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become the primary treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with venous involvement, suggesting a decrease in venous tumor infiltration. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of preserving the portal/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in PDAC patients who underwent NAT. Material and Methods: The 113 patients with resectable and borderline resectable PDAC with venous involvement who responded to NAT and underwent curative PD between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Among the 113 patients, PV/SMV preservation (PVP) was performed in 68 patients (60.2%), and PV/SMV resection (PVR) was performed in 45 patients (39.8%). There was no significant difference in the R0 rate, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival between the two groups. PV/SMV stenosis within 3 months after surgery was more common in the PVR group than in the PVP group (1.5% versus 22.2%; P &lt; 0.001), and 5-year PV/SMV stenosis-free survival was significantly higher in the PVP group than in the PVR group (76.5% versus 53.4%; P=0.014). Multivariate analysis showed that gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with poor OS. PVR, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and locoregional recurrence were independent risk factors for PV/SMV stenosis. Conclusion: The PVP group had similar oncologic outcomes and better vessel-functional outcomes than the PVR group. Therefore, if dissection is possible and there is a high likelihood of achieving R0 resection after NAT, routine PVR may be unnecessary in PDAC patients with venous involvement.

Whether T-tube biliary drainage is necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective study

BackgroundPostoperative complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are still a thorny problem. This study aims to verify the preventative impact of T-tube on them.MethodsThe electronic medical records and follow-up data of patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy in our center from July 2016 to June 2020 were reviewed. According to whether T tube was placed during the operation, the patients were divided into T-tube group and not-T-tube group. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize selection bias.ResultsA total of 330 patients underwent PD (Not-T-tube group =226, T-tube group=104). Propensity score matching resulted in 222 patients for further analysis (Not-T-tube group =134, T-tube group=88). Patients' demographics were comparable in the matched cohorts. Significantly higher incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) ((14 (10.45%) VS 20 (22.73%)), P=0.013) were observed in the T-tube group. The total incidence of biliary anastomotic stricture (BAS) was 3.15%. The incidence was slightly lower in the T-tube group, but there was no statistically significant differentiation (6 (4.48%) VS 1 (1.14%), P=0.317).ConclusionsIt is not feasible to prevent postoperative complications with the application of a T-tube in PD.

Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: After pancreatic surgery, the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious concern. POPF involves the leakage of pancreatic fluids from the surgical site, which can lead to complications and even death. Preventing POPF is essential for enhancing patient recovery and lessening the impact on healthcare resources. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated medical methods and surgical techniques to prevent POPF. Methods: This study was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42024500938. An electronic search was conducted through the PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases for all relevant articles published in English from 2018 to 2023. The following search terms were used: ((Whipple procedure OR Pancreaticojejunal OR Pancreaticogastrostomy) AND (Prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula) AND (Prevention OR Octreotide OR Sealant agent OR Stent OR Postoperative drain)). Results: Of 260 papers, 28 articles extracted through the database search were considered suitable for the systematic review. The included studies investigated a variety of surgical approaches for pancreatic resection. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was the most prevalent intervention. The incidence rates for POPF varied widely across the studies, ranging from as low as 11.6% to as high as 100%. The incidence rate of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) ranged from 11.7% to 33.3%. The length of postoperative hospital stays also varied significantly. Discussion: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) affects 13–41% of patients post-pancreatic surgery. Despite its high incidence, mortality rates are low. Postoperative hospital stay varies, with higher rates in older patients and overweight individuals. Advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have reduced mortality rates to &lt;5%. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the outcomes of pancreatectomy, including the incidence of POPF, postoperative hospital stays, and mortality rate. The findings suggest that the incidence of POPF is similar to that suggested in the literature and is influenced by various factors.

SP4.7 - Intraoperative pancreas consistency and evidence of pancreatitis during pancreatoduodenectomy, and the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula

Abstract Background Soft/normal pancreas consistency is a known risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for malignancy. A hard pancreas is considered less technically challenging to work with and generally allows the formation of a more robust pancreatic anastomosis. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pancreas consistency and intra-operative pancreatitis on the incidence of POPF in PD patients. Methods Data was extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple’s (RAW) study, a multicentre retrospective cohort study of outcomes following PD performed for malignancy (29 centres in 8 countries, n=1484). Patients with operation notes which documented a subjective assessment of pancreas tissue consistency and whether there was intra-operative evidence of pancreatitis were included. The incidence of POPF and clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) was calculated and comparisons were made using the chi-squared test. The 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula definitions were used. Results Of the 40.6% patients included, 41.5% had a soft/normal pancreas and 58.2% had a firm/hard pancreas. Both POPF (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 3.3-8.3) and CR-POPF (OR: 4.7, 95% CI: 2.5-8.9) were significantly more common in the former (both p&amp;lt;0.0001). A soft/normal pancreas was most common in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and least common in those with pancreatic cancer (56.4% vs 33.4%). 32.6% had their intra-operative pancreatitis status documented. Of these, 22.8% had evidence of pancreatitis and 77.2% did not. POPF (11.8% vs 16.1%, p=0.3) and CR-POPF (8.2% vs 9.4%, p=0.7) rates were similar in these groups. Conclusion In our multicentre study of PD outcomes, POPF and CR-POPF were significantly more common in those with a soft/normal pancreas. This may have implications for postoperative management planning.

Hospital charge and resource use analysis of extended-spectrum penicillin antibiotic therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy in intermediate- and high-risk patients

BackgroundWe previously reported that an extended antibiotic mitigation pathway following pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with intermediate-/high-risk glands is associated with 83 % lower odds of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). We now describe associations between the pathway, resource utilization, and hospital charges. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent elective pancreatoduodenectomy with soft gland texture and fistula risk score (FRS) ≥3 who received standard or extended antibiotics. Hospital charges and resource utilization within 90 days of surgery were compared by CR-POPF status and antibiotic pathway. ResultsA total of 34 patients received extended antibiotics and 53 received standard antibiotics. In patients with CR-POPF, patients who received extended antibiotics had lower likelihood of surgical or percutaneous reintervention (75.0 % vs. 100.0 %, p = 0.022). Ninety-day postoperative charges associated with CR-POPF were higher than no CR-POPF ($60,527 vs. $25,631, p = 0.028). Our risk-based model predicted a $15,825 decrease in hospital charges per patient receiving extended antibiotics. ConclusionsCR-POPF is associated with higher 90-day hospital charges. Extended antibiotic therapy following pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with soft gland texture and FRS ≥3 is associated with fewer reinterventions in patients who develop CR-POPF. These outcomes will be formally tested in a randomized controlled trial (NCT05753735).

Shorter Drainage Tube to the Pancreatic Stump Reduces Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.

We investigated the relationship between the length of a prophylactic closed-suction drainage tube and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) in distal pancreatectomy (DP). The clinical data of 76 patients who underwent DP using a reinforced stapler for the division of the pancreas at Ehime University Hospital between December 2017 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Laparoscopic DP was performed in 41 patients (53.9%). Closed-suction drainage was performed using a 19Fr ExuFlow Round Drain with a vacuum bulb. The drainage tube length was defined as the distance between the peripancreatic stump site and the abdominal wall insertion site using abdominal radiography. CR-POPF was observed in 12 patients (15.8%). Univariate analyses demonstrated that male sex (P=0.020), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (P=0.017), current smoking (P=0.005), and drainage tube length (P<0.001) were significantly associated with CR-POPF. The optimal cut-off value of drainage tube length for CR-POPF was 220mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.80). In multivariate analyses, drainage tube length (≥220mm) was the sole independent predictor for CR-POPF (odds ratio, 6.59; P=0.023). According to computed tomography performed ∼1 week after surgery, the median volume of peripancreatic fluid collection was significantly higher in the long drainage tube group than in the short drainage tube group (P<0.001). A drainage tube inserted at a shorter distance to the pancreatic stump may reduce the incidence of CR-POPF after DP.

Comparisons of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using barbed and conventional sutures for pancreaticojejunostomy: a propensity score matching study.

There are limited data on the effect of different sutures and surgical approaches on the quality of pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). This study compares the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) between the use of barbed sutures (BSs) and conventional sutures (CSs). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 253 consecutive patients who had undergone MIPD from July 2016 to April 2023. Patients were excluded if conversion to open surgery or open anastomosis was necessary. 220 patients were enrolled and divided into BS (n = 148) and CS (n = 72) groups. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 67 cases remained in each group. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with CR-POPF. Comparisons were also made between laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic (RPD) pancreaticoduodenectomy. After PSM, BSs were associated with significantly lower rates of CR-POPF (7.5 vs. 22.4%, P = 0.015) and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) (7.5vs. 19.4%, P = 0.043). No significant differences were found in operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, or other major morbidities. Multivariate analyses revealed BMI 22kg/m2 (OR = 5.048, 95% CI: 1.256-20.287, P = 0.023) and the use of BSs (OR = 0.196, 95% CI: 0.059-0.653, P = 0.008) as the independent predictors of CR-POPF. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the LPD and RPD groups, but RPD was associated with significantly shorter operative time (402.8min vs. 429.4min, P = 0.015). In conclusion, using BSs for PJ during MIPD is feasible and has the potential to reduce CR-POPF and severe complications.

Early postoperative fever as a predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective observational study

BackgroundThe connection between early postoperative fever and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this association and assess the predictive value of early postoperative fever for CR-POPF.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 2007 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those with early postoperative fever (≥ 38 °C in the first 48 h after surgery) and those without early postoperative fever groups. Weighted logistic regression analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and multivariable logistic analysis were performed. The c-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to evaluate the impact on the predictive power of adding early postoperative fever to previously identified predictors of CR-POPF.ResultsOf the 1997 patients analyzed, 909 (45.1%) developed early postoperative fever. The overall incidence of CR-POPF among all the patients was 14.3%, with an incidence of 19.5% in the early postoperative fever group and 9.9% in the group without early postoperative fever. Early postoperative fever was significantly associated with a higher risk of CR-POPF after sIPTW (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34–2.22; P < 0.001) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42–2.49; P < 0.001). The c-statistics for the models with and without early postoperative fever were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73–0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72–0.78), respectively, showing a significant difference between the two (difference, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00–0.03; DeLong’s test, P = 0.005).ConclusionsEarly postoperative fever is a significant but not highly discriminative predictor of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, its widespread occurrence limits its applicability as a predictive marker.

Efficacy of Reinforced Stapler for Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy.

Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has become a treatment option for benign and malignant pancreatic tumors, the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers in MIDP remain controversial. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety of reinforced staplers in MIDP and identify the risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after MIDP with reinforced staplers. In total, 92 consecutive patients who underwent MIDP at NHO Kyushu Medical Center from July 2016 to August 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. In all patients, a reinforced black cartridge triple-row stapler (Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used during MIDP. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant POPF. The risk factors for POPF were evaluated using multivariate analysis. Among the 92 patients, 74 underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 18 underwent robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. Clinically relevant POPF occurred in seven (7.6%) of 92 patients. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) was 10.8%, and the mortality rate was 0%. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after MIDP with a reinforced stapler was a body mass index of ≥22.6 kg/m2 (p=0.050, odds ratio=7.60). This study confirmed the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers for preventing POPF after MIDP. A high body mass index was the only risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after MIDP with a reinforced stapler.

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Duct To Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy After 100 Consecutive Whipple’s Surgery

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a concerning complication following pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Its incidence can be as high as 20%, with identified risk factors including soft gland texture, small main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter, pancreatic pathology, and significant intraoperative blood loss. Our primary objective is to determine the incidence of POPF and assess its associated risk factors by consistently applying a uniform surgical technique and utilizing uniform suturing materials. Methods: Our study included patients who underwent PJ following pancreaticoduodenectomy at our center using a consistent duct-to-mucosa technique and the same suturing material, PDS 5-0. Data from 100 consecutive patients were collected and entered into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 26) for analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Results: Among the 100 patients, the incidence of clinically relevant POPF was 5%. Factors such as gland texture and main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter did not demonstrate any statistically significant correlation with POPF, however the frequency of POPF was notably high in cases with an MPD diameter of less than 3 mm. Mortality following clinically relevant POPF was substantial, reaching 4%, and this association was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: POPF represents a severe complication associated with statistically significant mortality. Employing a uniform standard duct-to-mucosa anastomotic technique along with consistent use of suturing material is imperative to mitigate bias and minimize the risk of POPF.