Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: a comparative propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes

Abstract

IntroductionCompared to open pancreaticoduodenectomies (OPD), the robotic (RPD) approach improves the rate of complication and the length of stay. However, it remains unknown if these benefits persist in octogenarians, who are at higher risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database was performed to identify patients aged 80 years or older who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2015 and 2021. Patients who underwent RPD or OPD were compared using inversed probability weighting of the propensity score to control for known confounding variables. Outcomes assessed include operative time, length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge, major complications, unplanned readmission, return to the operating room (OR), mortality, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CRPOPF). ResultsOf 30,751 patients undergoing PD, 1720 were 80 or older. One thousand six hundred twenty-five patients (94 %) underwent OPD, and 95 (6 %) underwent RPD. RPD was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of major complications (32.6 % vs. 45.6 % in OPD; p < 0.01) and a lower rate of non-home discharge (24.7 % vs. 34.3 % in OPD; p < 0.05). However, RPD was associated with a longer operative time (438 min vs. 342 min for OPD; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in other assessed outcomes between the two groups. ConclusionRPD may reduce major postoperative complications and non-home discharges compared to the open approach for octogenarians.