Relevant Bleeding Research Articles

Impact of Residual Vein Venous Thrombosis in Consecutive Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Treated with Tinzaparin-A Cohort Study.

Background: The role of residual venous thrombosis (RVT) as a risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) remains controversial. Methods: We conducted a cohort study on consecutive patients with CAT treated with tinzaparin recruited between 2007 and 2022. Primary outcome: RVT. Secondary outcomes: identification of variables associated with RVT and the role of RVT in VTE recurrences or clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). Results: Among 511 patients with CAT (age 64.1 years ± 13.4 years; 53.5% males) followed for 17.6 months (p25-75: 7.9-34), 35.8% (n = 183) presented RVT (at 6 months, 55.5%). Variables identified as being associated with RVT were ECOG performance status > 1, metastasis, and cancer location. Within 5 years, there were 57 CRB (11.2%; 95% CI: 8.6-14.2) and 67 VTE recurrences (13.1%, 95%CI: 10.3-16.4). Competing risk analysis identified that RVT at 6 months was associated with VTE recurrence within 5 years (sub-hazard ratio: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7; p = 0.006), but not with CRB. Multivariate analysis confirmed that RVT at 6 months (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7) and metastases (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.9) were associated with VTE recurrence within 5 years. Conclusions: RVT is high in patients with CAT. The presence of RVT at 6 months was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE over 5 years.

Upper- vs Lower-Extremity Secondary Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

An upper-extremity approach for secondary access during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may reduce clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding. To investigate the safety and efficacy of an upper-extremity approach compared with a lower-extremity approach in patients undergoing TAVI. The TAVI XS trial was a randomized clinical trial performed between November 28, 2022, and November 15, 2023, with a 30-day follow-up, in 4 TAVI centers in the Netherlands. Eligibility was determined first, and only those patients with severe aortic stenosis and no contraindication for upper- or lower-extremity secondary access were informed about the study and asked to participate. Participants were randomized 1:1 between the upper-extremity approach (radial artery diagnostic access and upper-arm vein for temporary pacing lead placement) and lower-extremity approach (femoral artery diagnostic access and femoral vein for temporary pacing lead placement) for secondary access during TAVI. Primary end point was clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5) of the randomized secondary access. Secondary end points included any clinically relevant bleeding, time to mobilization, duration of hospitalization, secondary access failure, and procedural time. Of a total of 324 eligible patients, 238 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI (mean [SD] age, 79.4 [6.5] years; 150 male [63.0%]; median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, 2.2% [IQR, 1.5%-3.5%]) were included. The primary end point occurred in 5 of 119 patients (4.2%) in the upper-extremity group and 16 of 119 (13.4%) in the lower-extremity group (odds ratio [OR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.80]; P = .01). Incidence of any clinically relevant bleeding was decreased in the upper-extremity group (25 of 119 [21.0%] vs 41 of 119 [34.5%] patients; OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]; P = .02). There was no difference in time to mobilization or duration of hospitalization. Secondary access failure (14 of 119 [11.8%] vs 1 of 119 [0.8%] patients; OR, 15.73 [95% CI, 2.03-121.69]; P = .001) and procedural time (60.0 [IQR, 39.0-88.0; 95% CI, 53.0-70.0] vs 48.0 [IQR, 34.0-64.0; 95% CI, 40.0-55.0] minutes; P = .002) were higher in the upper-extremity cohort. In this randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI, the upper-extremity approach for secondary access was associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding compared with the conventional lower-extremity approach and should be considered to reduce periprocedural bleeding complications. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05672823.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and High Risk of Stroke Treated with Oral Anticoagulation or Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Cardinality Matched Analysis

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a significant risk of stroke. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative for patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (OAC) or with high risk of bleeding. This study aims to compare the outcomes of LAAO versus conventional stroke prevention in high-risk AF-patients. Methods: This secondary analysis incorporates data from the prospective Swiss-AF and Beat-AF cohorts, and the Zurich LAAO Registry. Cardinality matching was performed to create two comparable cohorts: conventional treatment (92% OAC) and LAAO. The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke, cardiovascular (CV) death, and clinically relevant bleeding. Kaplan-Meier method with competing risk analysis was used. Results: Each group included 468 patients (age 76.4 [70.5, 82.0] years, 33% female). The LAAO group exhibited higher baseline bleeding risk (HAS BLED 2.0 [1.0–3.0] versus 3.0 [3.0–4.0]; p < 0.001). Median follow-up time: 6.0 (4.7–7.0) years in conventional treatment group and 4.0 (1.5–6.1) in LAAO group. No significant difference in the primary composite endpoint (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72–1.06, p = 0.18), stroke risk (HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.66–1.97, p = 0.64), or CV mortality (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.82–1.42, p = 0.60) was observed between groups. LAAO correlated with a significantly lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47–0.80, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this cardinality matched analysis with long-term follow-up, LAAO showed similar stroke and CV death rates but lower clinically relevant bleeding risk compared to conventional therapy in high-risk AF-patients.

A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of Factor XI/XIa Inhibitors in Patients With ESKD on Hemodialysis

IntroductionFactor XI/XIa (FXI/XIa) has emerged as a potential target for antithrombotic therapy, driven by preclinical evidence showing a role of FXI/XIa inhibition for preventing thrombosis without impeding hemostasis. This is particularly promising for patients at high risk of both thromboembolic events and bleeding, such as patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis (HD). MethodsWe systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials evaluating FXI/XIa inhibitors in patients with ESKD on HD, without restricting inclusion to specific comparators or indications. Interventional treatment arms were pooled, and study results were synthesized by fitting random-effects models, calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsFive phase II studies encompassing 1,270 participants were identified, investigating gruticibart, IONIS-FXIRx, osocimab, or fesomersen in the general HD population and using placebo as a comparator. Four studies were fully published and included in the meta-analysis. Use of FXI/XIa inhibitors was associated with an OR of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.47-1.35) for clinically relevant bleeding, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.21-1.28) for major bleeding, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.49-1.68) for clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The ORs for thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.28-1.56) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.15-1.40), respectively. ConclusionCurrently available evidence does not indicate a significantly increased bleeding risk of FXI/XIa inhibitors in patients with ESKD on HD compared to placebo. Their efficacy and their association with all-cause mortality need to be investigated in sufficiently powered, randomized controlled phase III trials.

Secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with low dose apixaban or rivaroxaban in major-thrombophilia carriers.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and represent the gold standard for VTE secondary prophylaxis, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit widespread DOACs usage there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety in major thrombophilia carriers and almost no data is available for low intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban as secondary VTE prophylaxis in such patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate and confront the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis, in major thrombophilia carriers vs patients at high risk of VTE recurrence for other reasons. We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5mg BID or rivaroxaban 10mg daily and that were screened for thrombophilia. The examined patients were 339. Baseline characteristics such as sex, age, obesity rate, smoking, number of previous VTEs and comorbidities (such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, mild CKD) were equally distributed in either group. The median low-dose DOACs administration time was 19.20months (IQR 12.17-35.67). During low-dose DOACs treatment, 13 (3.8%) VTE recurrences were observed; 14 bleeding events were registered (4,1%), with no major bleeding (MB), 6 clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) (1.8%) and 8 minor bleeding (2.3%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between major thrombophilia carriers and non-major thrombophilia carriers. In multivariate analysis increased risk of VTE recurrence was found for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (HR 4.00 - p = 0.034) and for patients with more than one previous VTE episode (HR 5.14-p = 0.034). Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis for carriers of major thrombophilia with no increase in VTE recurrence and/or bleeding risk.

Management and outcomes in patients with tumor thrombus: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTumor thrombus can be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and poor prognosis. The risks and benefits of anticoagulation remain unclear. MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with tumor thrombus from 2019 to 2022. All patients were followed for 12 months from the diagnosis of tumor thrombus or until death if death occurred earlier. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients prescribed any dose of anticoagulation for tumor thrombus (or concurrent bland thrombus/VTE). The secondary outcomes included new thrombosis, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and mortality. We calculated the 6- and 12-month cumulative incidence of outcomes with 95% CI and compared those given anticoagulation vs not, considering death as a competing risk. ResultsWe included 211 patients, among whom 106 (50.2%; 95% CI, 47.9%-52.6%) were given anticoagulation for tumor thrombus or concurrent VTE (present in 21.8%). The most common type of cancer was hepatocellular carcinoma (28%). Splanchnic veins were the most commonly involved (49.3%). Anticoagulation was more likely used if tumor thrombus involved the inferior vena cava and the heart, with concurrent VTE, or if thrombosis service was consulted. The overall 12-month incidence of new VTE was 11.4% (95% CI, 7.3%-16.5%), that of major bleeding + clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 36.6% (95% CI, 29.6%-43.5%), and mortality of 52.5% (95% CI, 44.8%-59.6%), with no significant differences among groups given anticoagulation or not. ConclusionPatients with tumor thrombus carry high risks of VTE, bleeding, and mortality. The impact of anticoagulation remains unclear.

Venous thromboembolism secondary prophylaxis in elderly people (over 75-year-old) with low-dose direct oral anticoagulants: single-center Italian experience

Nowadays, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the gold standard for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and VTE secondary prophylaxis; nevertheless, the percentage of elderly patients in major trials and literature data about DOACs usage for VTE secondary prophylaxis in the elderly are scant. Our retrospective study tried to evaluate low-dose DOACs efficacy and safety for elderly VTE secondary prophylaxis in a real-life setting. A cohort of 73 patients (≥ 75 years) considered at high risk of VTE recurrence was treated with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily as VTE secondary prophylaxis. The median low-dose DOACs administration time was 18.40 months. Three (4.1%) VTE recurrence events were observed, with four bleeding events registered (5.5%), including one major bleeding (MB) (1.4%) and two clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) (2.7%). Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and well tolerated for secondary VTE prophylaxis in elderly patients at high risk of VTE recurrence.

Duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients: Kids-DOTT trial outcomes at 2 years

BackgroundThe Kids-DOTT multinational, randomized clinical trial revealed noninferiority of a 6-week vs 3-month duration of anticoagulation for the treatment of provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients <21 years old in regard to net clinical benefit at 1 year. ObjectivesTo evaluate noninferiority at 2 years. MethodsPatients whose repeat imaging 6 weeks after VTE diagnosis did not show complete veno-occlusion were randomized to discontinue anticoagulation vs receive a total 3-month course and followed for 2 years for the occurrence of symptomatic recurrent VTE (efficacy outcome) and clinically relevant bleeding (safety outcome). Outcomes were centrally adjudicated, and net clinical benefit was compared between treatment arms via a prespecified bivariate noninferiority boundary, using 95% CIs in absolute risk differences between treatment arms. ResultsKaplan–Meier estimates of 2-year cumulative incidences in the 6-week and 3-month arms of the intention-to-treat population (n = 417) were 1.7% (95% CI, 0%, 3.7%) and 2.9% (95% CI, 0.3%, 5.4%), respectively, for symptomatic recurrent VTE and 1.1% (95% CI, 0%, 2.5%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 0.6%, 5.7%), respectively, for clinically relevant bleeding. Bivariate analysis of the absolute risk differences in the intention-to-treat population demonstrated that a 6-week anticoagulation duration was noninferior to a 3-month course. ConclusionThese findings support durability of the Kids-DOTT randomized clinical trial findings of net clinical benefit at 2 years.

Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of provoked acute cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in patients

BackgroundProspective multicenter data on the treatment and outcomes of children with cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) are limited. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes of patients with a first-episode of provoked acute CSVT enrolled in the Kids-DOTT trial and compare these features with those of participants with non-CSVT venous thromboembolism (VTE). MethodsThis was a subgroup analysis from the Kids-DOTT trial, a multinational randomized clinical trial on duration of anticoagulation for provoked acute VTE in patients younger than 21 years. Patient and thrombus characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with CSVT were compared with those of patients with non-CSVT VTE. ResultsCSVT was diagnosed in 75 of the 532 (14%), 25 of whom received 6 weeks of anticoagulant treatment and 50 received 3 or more months. When compared with non-CSVT VTE, CSVT was more likely to occur in neonates and young children, associated with infection in general and acute head/neck infection in particular, and less likely to be related to central venous catheter. No patient in either group developed symptomatic recurrent VTE or clinically relevant bleeding, and there was no significant difference in rates of complete thrombus resolution between the 2 treatment durations. ConclusionCSVT is most common in neonates and young children and those with acute head and neck infections. A 6-week anticoagulation treatment course appears to be safe (no clinically relevant bleeding) and effective (no difference in symptomatic recurrent VTE) for provoked acute pediatric CSVT. Nevertheless, given the nature of a subpopulation analysis, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Use of antithrombotic therapy and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding in cancer patients at the end of life: a Danish nationwide cohort study

BackgroundDespite uncertain benefit-risk profile near the end of life, antithrombotic therapy (ATT) is prevalent in patients with terminal cancer. ObjectivesTo examine adherence and persistence with ATT in terminally ill cancer patients and investigate risks of major and clinically relevant bleeding, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) by ATT exposure. MethodsUsing a Danish nationwide cohort of terminal cancer patients, ATT adherence in the year following terminal illness declaration was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) by prescription. Discontinuation was defined as a treatment gap of ≥30 days between prescription renewals. One-year cumulative incidences of bleeding complications, VTE, and ATE were calculated, considering the competing risk of death. ResultsDuring 2013-2022, 86 732 terminally ill cancer patients were identified (median age, 75 years; 47% female; median survival, 57 days). At terminal illness declaration, 37.5% were receiving ATT (66.6% platelet inhibitors, 23.0% direct oral anticoagulants, and 10.4% vitamin K antagonists [VKAs]). The mean PDC was 88% (SD, 30%), highest among platelet inhibitor users (mean PDC, 89%) and lowest among VKA users (73%). One-year ATT discontinuation incidence was 7.9% (95% CI, 7.7%-8.1%). Most patients continued ATT until death (74.8% platelet inhibitors, 58.8% direct oral anticoagulants, and 61.6% VKAs). Patients receiving ATT had a lower 1-year VTE risk but higher risks of ATE and major bleeding. ConclusionDespite uncertain benefit-risk profile, most terminally ill cancer patients continue ATT until the end of life. These findings provide insights into current ATT utilization and discontinuation dynamics in the challenging context of terminal illness.

Safety of Sofosbuvir-Based Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Co-Administration.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for the management of thrombosis prophylaxis, especially in patients with atrial fibrillation. As substrates of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein, they are implicated in potential drug-drug interactions. NS5A/NS5B inhibitors are direct-acting agents (DAAs) against the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection that exert a mild inhibition of P-glycoprotein without effects on CYP3A4. A DOAC and NS5A/NS5B inhibitor co-administration may lead to an increased risk of bleeding. Real-world data on the concomitant use of DOACs and DAAs are scarce. On this purpose, we perform a retrospective analysis on the risk of vascular adverse events (bleeding and thrombosis) among HCV patients under DOAC/DAA therapy, even in advanced liver disease. Methods: Between May 2015 and April 2023, patients treated with sofosbuvir-based DAA regimens and DOACs were consecutively included in this study from 12 Italian medical centers. Baseline characteristics, especially concerning bleeding risk and liver function, were collected. The occurrence of bleeding events, classified as major and minor, was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were the rate of any thrombotic events and/or the need for discontinuation of one or both treatments. Moreover, a cohort of patients, matched by demographic characteristics (age and sex), that switched to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) during the antiviral treatment was compared with the DOAC/DAA group. Results: A total of 104 patients were included. Thirty-eight of them (36.5%) were cirrhotic. Atrial fibrillation was an indication for anticoagulation in almost all cases (76%). Rivaroxaban (35.6%) was the most used DOAC, followed by apixaban (26.9%), dabigatran (19.2%) and edoxaban (18.3%). Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (78.8%) was the most prescribed DAA, and all patients were already on anticoagulant therapy before the start of DAAs. During concomitant DOAC/DAA treatment, no major bleeding events were recorded, while four minor bleeding events occurred, but none resulted in DAA or DOAC discontinuation. At univariate analysis, the only additional risk factor statistically related to bleeding events was the anticoagulant therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 13.2, 95% confidence interval 1,6-109). Performing an evaluation by a LOGIT binomial analysis with demographic characteristics, the antiplatelet therapy remained statistically associated to bleeding events. No significant differences were found in the rate of clinically relevant bleeding when the main population was compared with the VKA-switched cohort. A single major bleeding event leading to anticoagulation and DAA discontinuation was reported in VKA-switched matched cohort. Conclusions: In our study, the concomitant use of NS5A/NS5B inhibitors with DOAC showed good safety, and the only risk factor associated with bleeding events was the concomitant antiplatelet therapy. These findings support the use of DOACs during sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment, even in advanced liver disease. Replacing DOACs with VKAs does not appear to be of clinical benefit.

Outcomes in children with provoked venous thrombosis and antiphospholipid antibodies: findings from the Kids-DOTT trial

AbstractFew studies have prospectively evaluated the incidence and outcomes in children with provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) and transient or persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). We compared outcomes of patients aged <21 years with a first-episode acute provoked VTE and positive aPL at diagnosis, enrolled in the Multicenter Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children trial. aPLs were tested at enrollment and, when positive, repeated at 6 weeks after VTE diagnosis. Subsequent testing was performed at the discretion of the treating hematologist. Of 524 patients, 116 (22%) had positive aPLs at enrollment. At follow-up, 70 (60%) had transient (n = 66) or low-titer aPLs (n = 4), 11 (10%) had persistent aPLs meeting the criteria for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), and 35 (30%) had no repeat testing. Patients with APS were older (15.8 vs 9.9 years; P = .014) and had a statistically significant higher risk of symptomatic recurrent VTE (18% vs 1%; odds ratio [OR], 12.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-108; P = .025) and a statistically nonsignificant but clinically meaningful difference in the risk of anticoagulant-related clinically relevant bleeding (9% vs 0%; OR, 20.1; 95% CI, 0.7-558; P = .077) compared with those in the transient or low-titer aPL group. In conclusion, aPLs are common in young patients with acute provoked VTE and are mostly transitory and clinically insignificant. Patients with APS and provoked VTE appear to have an increased risk of recurrent VTE compared with patients with transitory or low-titer aPLs. Future collaborative studies should investigate the optimal VTE management for children with provoked VTE who meet the criteria for APS. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00687882.

COVID-19 venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in pediatrics

IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines for VTE prophylaxis were established at our institution at the beginning of the pandemic. Patients who had any VTE risk factors in addition to COVID-19 met criteria for anticoagulation prophylaxis. Patients who were diagnosed with MIS-C met criteria regardless of additional risk factors. Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C to determine compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines and to evaluate the incidence of VTE and bleeding events in our population. Results and conclusionsAmong a total of 678 patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C, 519 (76 %) patients met criteria for VTE prophylaxis and 348 (65.6 %) started prophylaxis. Logistic regression analysis identified a personal or family history of thrombosis or thrombophilia, diagnosis of MIS-C, admission to the intensive care unit, and presence of a central venous catheter as significantly associated with starting VTE prophylaxis. There were 18 patients who developed VTE. Minor bleeding events occurred in 19 patients (5 %), patient important bleeding, no intervention occurred in 8 patients (2 %), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in 8 patients (2 %), and major bleeding in 10 patients (3 %). The incidence of VTE in our patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C is similar to VTE rates at other institutions. We found that universally recognized VTE risk factors were appropriate to include as risk factors for thrombosis in hospitalized children with COVID-19 and MIS-C.

Risk of bleeding in patients with essential thrombocythemia and extreme thrombocytosis

AbstractApproximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.

Safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in peritoneal dialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: protocol for a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial (APIDP2)

IntroductionSeveral randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that novel oral anticoagulants are safer compared with vitamin K antagonists for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to prevent thromboembolic events in...

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown comparable efficacy and a superior safety profile in clinical trials for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, further study is needed to assess DOACs' effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin in a real-world context. Thus, this meta-analysis compares the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with VTE. A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from inception until June 2024. We examined observational studies that compared safety and effectiveness between DOACs and warfarin when used in treating VTE and reported adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and/or odds ratios (ORs) for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and death from any cause. We then estimated the pooled effect using the random-effects model for meta-analysis. A total of 25 studies were included in the current meta-analysis. DOAC therapy was associated with significantly lower risks of recurrent VTE (HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.85), major bleeding (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.83), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83) compared to warfarin. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between the two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.10). This meta-analysis found that DOACs are associated with a significant reduction in VTE recurrence in addition to the known favorable safety profile when compared to warfarin.

A Dynamic, D-dimer-based Thromboprophylaxis Strategy in Patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19 pandemics increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk during hospitalization, despite prophylactic anticoagulation. Limited radiological diagnosis in pandemic requires a guided protocol for anticoagulant adjustment. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center as part of a quality improvement program evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation protocols. The study focused on implementing a guideline for anticoagulant dosing protocol based on dynamic changes in D-dimer levels in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The dosing guideline allowed for dose escalation from standard prophylactic levels to escalated prophylactic or therapeutic levels, depending on the patient's risk profile for VTE. The primary endpoints included in-hospital survival comparing between fix and dynamic adjustment treatment groups. Secondary endpoints encompassed major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events, incidence of breakthrough thrombosis, length of hospitalization and ICU stay, days of mechanical ventilator use, and survival duration. Among the 260 COVID-19-infected patients hospitalized between March 15th and June 15th, 2020. The patients received fixed anticoagulant dosage in 188, 72.3%) patients, while 72 (27.7%) were up-titrated according to the protocol. In-hospital survival at 30 days demonstrated superiority among patients whose anticoagulation was up-titrated to either escalated prophylactic or therapeutic (80.2%) compared to receiving fixed anticoagulant dosage (51.3%) (p=0.01). Bleeding events were significantly higher in up-titrate group (12.5%) compared to fixed anticoagulant dosage group (2.13%). Most of them are CRNMB. A dynamic, D-dimer-based dose escalation of anticoagulation for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 holds promise in improving in-hospital mortality rates without a significant increase in fatal bleeding events.

Edoxaban Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Despite consistent recommendations from clinical guidelines, data from randomized trials on a long-term antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease are still lacking. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-masked, randomized trial comparing edoxaban monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent) in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease (defined as coronary artery disease previously treated with revascularization or managed medically). The risk of stroke was assessed on the basis of the CHA2DS2-VASc score (scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, and major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included a composite of major ischemic events and the safety outcome of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. We assigned 524 patients to the edoxaban monotherapy group and 516 patients to the dual antithrombotic therapy group at 18 sites in South Korea. The mean age of the patients was 72.1 years, 22.9% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3. At 12 months, a primary-outcome event had occurred in 34 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.8%) assigned to edoxaban monotherapy and in 79 patients (16.2%) assigned to dual antithrombotic therapy (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.65; P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of major ischemic events at 12 months appeared to be similar in the trial groups. Major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 23 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 4.7%) in the edoxaban monotherapy group and in 70 patients (14.2%) in the dual antithrombotic therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.53). In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, edoxaban monotherapy led to a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, or major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding at 12 months than dual antithrombotic therapy. (Funded by the CardioVascular Research Foundation and others; EPIC-CAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03718559.).

Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation After ACS and/or PCI: A 4-Way Comparison From AUGUSTUS

BackgroundThe optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not known. ObjectivesThe authors sought to determine which antithrombotic regimen best balances safety and efficacy. MethodsAUGUSTUS, a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design randomized trial compared apixaban with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF with recent ACS and/or PCI treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. We conducted a 4-way analysis comparing safety and efficacy outcomes in the 4 randomized groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes over 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint. ResultsA total of 4,614 patients were enrolled. All patients were treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.9% of patients randomized to apixaban plus placebo, 27.3% randomized to apixaban plus aspirin, 28.0% randomized to VKA plus placebo, and 33.3% randomized to VKA plus aspirin. Rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were lower with apixaban and placebo compared with the other 3 antithrombotic strategies. There was no difference between the 4 randomized groups with respect to all-cause death. ConclusionsIn patients with AF and a recent ACS and/or PCI, an antithrombotic regimen that included a P2Y12 inhibitor and apixaban without aspirin resulted in a lower incidence of the composite of death, bleeding, or cardiovascular hospitalization than regimens including VKA, aspirin, or both. (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT02415400)

Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores

BackgroundThe high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM) warrants primary thromboprophylaxis for most patients. Myeloma-specific thrombotic risk scores (TRSs), such as IMPEDE-VTE, SAVED, and PRISM, were developed to improve risk assessment and guide antithrombotic strategies. Their performance is variable and has not yet been tested in Latin America. ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the use of primary thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of VTE and bleeding events, and the effectiveness of TRSs in patients with newly diagnosed MM. MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study. Cumulative VTE rates and TRS performance were analyzed using survival and receiver operating characteristic curves. ResultsThe study included 250 newly diagnosed MM patients; the vast majority (98.6%) received aspirin as thromboprophylaxis. VTE occurred in 8% within the initial 6 months, increasing to 14.8% over a median follow-up of 19 months. High rates of major bleeding (4.8%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (4.4%) events were documented. A minimal proportion (0.8%, 0.5%, and 1.2%) of patients were classified as low risk by IMPEDE-VTE, PRISM, and SAVED scores, respectively. Only IMPEDE-VTE exhibited a trend for distinguishing between intermediate-risk (7.14%) and high-risk (13.2%) groups (P = .09). PRISM and SAVED scores showed limited utility. VTE did not impact survival. ConclusionAspirin as primary thromboprophylaxis carries an unacceptable risk of VTE and bleeding in patients at intermediate or high thrombotic risk. The IMPEDE-VTE score performed best, although without reaching statistical significance. We confirm that VTE does not portend poor overall survival in MM.