Final Oocyte Maturation Research Articles

Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS): A Narrative Review and Legal Implications.

Infertility is a highly meaningful issue with potentially life-changing consequences, and its incidence has been growing worldwide. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has made giant strides in terms of treating many infertility conditions, despite the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), a potentially life-threatening complication. This narrative review draws upon scientific articles found in the PubMed database. The search spanned the 1990-2024 period. Search strings used included "OHSS" or "ovarian hyperstimulation" and "IVF" and "GnRH" and "hCG"; 1098 results were retrieved and were ultimately narrowed down to 111 suitable sources, i.e., relevant articles dealing with the condition's underlying dynamics, management pathways, and evidence-based criteria and guidelines, crucial both from a clinical perspective and from the standpoint of medicolegal tenability. The following features constitute OHSS risk factors: young age, low body weight, and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), among others. GnRH antagonist can substantially lower the risk of severe OHSS, compared to the long protocol with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. However, a mild or moderate form of OHSS is also possible if the antagonist protocol is used, especially when hCG is used for the final maturation of oocytes. For women at risk of OHSS, GnRH agonist trigger and the freeze-all strategy is advisable. OHSS is one of the most frequent complications, with a 30% rate in IVF cycles. Providing effective care for OHSS patients begins with early diagnosis, while also evaluating for comorbidities and complications. In addition to that, we should pay more attention to the psychological component of this complication and of infertility as a whole. Compliance with guidelines and evidence-based best practices is essential for medicolegal tenability.

Follicular Fluid Proteomic Analysis to Identify Predictive Markers of Normal Embryonic Development.

Ageing populations, mass "baby-free" policies and children born to mothers at the age at which they are biologically expected to become grandmothers are growing problems in most developed societies. Therefore, any opportunity to improve the quality of infertility treatments seems important for the survival of societies. The possibility of indirectly studying the quality of developing oocytes by examining their follicular fluids (hFFs) offers new opportunities for progress in our understanding the processes of final oocyte maturation and, consequently, for predicting the quality of the resulting embryos and personalising their culture. Using mass spectrometry, we studied follicular fluids collected individually during in vitro fertilisation and compared their composition with the quality of the resulting embryos. We analysed 110 follicular fluids from 50 oocyte donors, from which we obtained 44 high-quality, 39 medium-quality, and 27 low-quality embryos. We identified 2182 proteins by Sequential Window Acquisition of all Theoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS) using a TripleTOF 5600+ hybrid mass spectrometer, of which 484 were suitable for quantification. We were able to identify several proteins whose concentrations varied between the follicular fluids of different oocytes from the same patient and between patients. Among them, the most important appear to be immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1 (IgA1hc) and dickkopf-related protein 3. The first one is found at higher concentrations in hFFs from which oocytes develop into poor-quality embryos, the other one exhibits the opposite pattern. None of these have, so far, had any specific links to fertility disorders. In light of these findings, these proteins should be considered a primary target for research aimed at developing a diagnostic tool for oocyte quality control and pre-fertilisation screening. This is particularly important in cases where the fertilisation of each egg is not an option for ethical or other reasons, or in countries where it is prohibited by law.

Optimization of a protocol for fertilized egg production in Japanese eel using recombinant gonadotropins, LHRHa, pimozide, and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone

Recently, two types of Japanese eel recombinant gonadotropins (rGths), recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFsh) and luteinizing hormone (rLh), have been successfully produced. However, the protocol for obtaining fertilized eggs using rGths has not yet been optimized. In this study, to establish a new protocol for obtaining fertilized eggs from Japanese eel, we decided to use rFsh as an inducer of vitellogenesis and focused on optimizing the final oocyte maturation (FOM) and ovulation induction method using rLh, 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (OHP), Lh-releasing hormone analog (LHRHa), and pimozide. Our findings indicates that OHP injection is crucial for stable ovulation induction. Quality evaluations revealed that the FOM and ovulation induction methods using LHRHa, pimozide, and OHP significantly improved the egg quality (fertility, hatchability, and larval survival) better than the methods using rLh and OHP (P < 0.05). Furthermore, effects of different doses of LHRHa and pimozide on egg quality were examined. We found that 0.5 mg/kg BW LHRHa, 10 mg/kg BW pimozide, and 2.0 mg/kg BW OHP injections was an effective and economical induction method, and this method was defined as the rGths method. When comparing the quality and quantity of eggs and larvae obtained by the rGths method with those obtained by the conventional method, the former displayed superior quality. In addition, the number of eggs, fertilized eggs, and normal larvae at 6 days post hatch was significantly higher in broodstock matured by the rGths method compared to the conventional method (P < 0.05). These results suggest that the new rGths method is a promising alternative for the artificial sexual maturation Japanese eel, potentially leading to a higher yield of larvae.

Optimizing trigger timing in minimal ovarian stimulation for In Vitro fertilization using machine learning models with random search hyperparameter tuning

Various studies have emphasized the importance of identifying the optimal Trigger Timing (TT) for the trigger shot in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), which is crucial for the successful maturation and release of oocytes, especially in minimal ovarian stimulation treatments. Despite its significance for the ultimate success of IVF, determining the precise TT remains a complex challenge for physicians due to the involvement of multiple variables. This study aims to enhance TT by developing a machine learning multi-output model that predicts the expected number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes (MII), fertilized oocytes (2 PN), and useable blastocysts within a 48-h window after the trigger shot in minimal stimulation cycles. By utilizing this model, physicians can identify patients with possible early, late, or on-time trigger shots. The study found that approximately 27 % of treatments administered the trigger shot on a suboptimal day, but optimizing the TT using the developed Artificial Intelligence (AI) model can potentially increase useable blastocyst production by 46 %. These findings highlight the potential of predictive models as a supplementary tool for optimizing trigger shot timing and improving IVF outcomes, particularly in minimal ovarian stimulation. The experimental results underwent statistical validation, demonstrating the accuracy and performance of the model. Overall, this study emphasizes the value of AI prediction models in enhancing TT and making the IVF process safer and more efficient.

Can We Harvest More Mature Oocytes by Repeating Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Doses in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients at Risk of OHSS in Antagonist Cycles? A Randomised Clinical Trial.

There is an ongoing debate about the optimal dosage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for oocyte triggering in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). In this study, we intend to ascertain whether the use of repeated doses of a GnRH agonist for oocyte triggering in these patients can enhance the outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. This randomised clinical trial enrolled 70 PCOS women candidates for IVF/ICSI with the standard antagonist protocol at Royan Institute (Tehran, Iran) from May 2020 to June 2022. Patients at risk of OHSS with oestradiol (E2) levels >3000 pg/ml on the day of trigger were randomly assigned to a control or experimental group. Group A (control group) patients received 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl®) for final oocyte maturation. Group B (experimental group) patients received a second dose of 0.1 mg Decapeptyl®12 hours after their first dose, for a total dose of 0.3 mg. IVF/ICSI outcomes were compared between the groups. Ultimately, 35 women from the study group and 33 from the control group completed the treatment cycle. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, baseline hormonal profiles, and PCOS phenotypes. The dosage of gonadotropin, stimulation duration, number of retrieved oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, and oocyte recovery ratio did not significantly differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in terms of the number of blastocyst and cleavage embryos, nor the quality of obtained embryos between the groups. The mild to moderate OHSS rate was significantly lower in the study group (P=0.038). A second dose of GnRH agonist 12 hours after the first dose did not improve the number and maturity of oocytes, or pregnancy outcomes in PCOS patients (registration number: NCT04600986).

Depletion of placental brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is attributed to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in mice offspring

IntroductionPremature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is one of the causes of female infertility. Unexplained POI is increasingly affecting women in their reproductive years. However, the etiology of POI is diverse and remains elusive. We and others have shown that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in adult ovarian function. Here, we report on a novel role of BDNF in the Developmental Origins of POI.MethodsPlacental BDNF knockout mice were created using CRISPR/CAS9. Homozygous knockout (cKO(HO)) mice didn’t survive, while heterozygous knockout (cKO(HE)) mice did. BDNF reduction in cKO(HE) mice was confirmed via immunohistochemistry and Western blots. Ovaries were collected from cKO(HE) mice at various ages, analyzing ovarian metrics, FSH expression, and litter sizes. In one-month-old mice, oocyte numbers were assessed using super-ovulation, and oocyte gene expression was analyzed with smart RNAseq. Ovaries of P7 mice were studied with SEM, and gene expression was confirmed with RT-qPCR. Alkaline phosphatase staining at E11.5 and immunofluorescence for cyclinD1 assessed germ cell number and cell proliferation.ResultscKO(HE) mice had decreased ovarian function and litter size in adulthood. They were insensitive to ovulation induction drugs manifested by lower oocyte release after superovulation in one-month-old cKO(HE) mice. The transcriptome and SEM results indicate that mitochondria-mediated cell death or aging might occur in cKO(HE) ovaries. Decreased placental BDNF led to diminished primordial germ cell proliferation at E11.5 and ovarian reserve which may underlie POI in adulthood.ConclusionThe current results showed decreased placental BDNF diminished primordial germ cell proliferation in female fetuses during pregnancy and POI in adulthood. Our findings can provide insights into understanding the underlying mechanisms of POI.

O-074 Dual trigger is not superior to GnRH Agonist alone for final oocyte maturation in elective fertility preservation. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Study question Is Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation associated with a higher number of mature (MII) oocytes compared to GnRH-a trigger alone in elective fertility preservation? Summary answer Adding hCG to GnRH-a for triggering final oocyte maturation does not increase the number of MII oocytes in elective fertility preservation cycles. What is known already Triggering final oocyte maturation represents a key step in ovarian stimulation. In good prognosis patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation, the current standard approach involves the administration of a single bolus of GnRH-agonist 36 hours before the pick-up. Previous studies have shown a higher number of MII oocytes when Dual Trigger (hCG+ GnRH-a) is performed, compared to recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) alone. Nevertheless, a notable gap exists in the literature, as no studies have investigated the potential additional benefit in final oocyte maturation when dual trigger is compared to GnRH-a alone. Study design, size, duration This is a randomized controlled superiority trial including elective oocyte cryopreservation cycles performed in a University Hospital. A total of 109 women were enrolled in this study between October 2021 to April 2023 with a 1:1 allocation. Eligible patients were ≤40 years old, with an antral follicular count (AFC)&amp;lt;20 and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)≤3ng/ml. Patients were randomized to final oocyte maturation triggering with Triptorelin 0,2mg or a dual trigger (Triptorelin 0.2 mg + 250 ug rhCG). Participants/materials, setting, methods Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed using 225-300IU/day of rFSH alfa or beta, or equivalent rFSH delta (15-20μg), tailored to ovarian reserve and BMI. LH surge was suppressed through a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, with oral administration of micronized progesterone (200mg daily) from the beginning of ovarian stimulation until the trigger day. The primary outcome was the number of MII oocytes. Comparisons are presented as estimated mean difference (EMD) and corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI). Main results and the role of chance Overall, 104 patients were analyzed, 51 in the Dual trigger group and 53 in the control arm (GnRH-a). We found no statistically significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes comparing Dual Trigger group (8.71 ± 4.90) and GnRH-a group (9.51 ± 5.19). Similarly, the number of MII oocytes demonstrated no significant differences, with 6.86 ± 4.40 in the Dual Trigger group compared to 7.87±4.40 in the GnRH-a group (EMD -1.01 [90%CI: -2.44;0.43]). Exploring the hormonal profile there were no notable variations in estradiol levels (2064.60 ± 890.50 pg/ml vs. 2494.41 ± 1341.05 pg/ml), progesterone levels (7.78 ± 3.88 ng/ml vs. 8.94 ± 5.10 ng/ml), LH (56.28 ± 26.83 IU/L vs. 63.41 ± 32.50 IU/L), and FSH (31.14 ± 7.86 IU/L vs. 31.53 ± 9.89 IU/L) on the day following the trigger. Notably, neither group exhibited any case of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS). Limitations, reasons for caution The sample size was calculated to detect differences on the number of MII oocytes. Therefore, results for secondary outcomes (number of oocytes retrieved and hormonal profile) should be interpreted with caution. Wider implications of the findings Adding hCG to GnRH-a for triggering final oocyte maturation does not confer any additional benefits in elective fertility preservation in term of MII oocytes compared to the administration of GnRH-a alone. Trial registration number NCT04992468

P-703 Is the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval associated with ART outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Study question Is the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes? Summary answer Limited evidence suggests that extending the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval from 33-36h to 37-41h does not affect ART outcomes. What is known already The time interval between final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval varies among IVF centres, although an interval of 33–36 h is the most widely adopted. The use of a prolonged time interval of 37-41h has been suggested to increase the number and competence of oocytes retrieved, their maturation, their ability to be fertilized, their capacity to produce usable embryos and the probability of pregnancy. Considering recently published data, a systematic review is warranted to provide clinicians with updated, evidence-based information regarding the optimal time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to evaluate the effect of the time interval between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval on ART outcomes. For this purpose, a literature search was carried out until January 2024 in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate, while ovulation before oocyte retrieval, oocytes retrieved, maturation rate, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, implantation rate and miscarriage rate were secondary outcomes. Participants/materials, setting, methods Citation, demographic, methodological and clinical data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the RoB2 Tool by Cochrane. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by I2. In dichotomous data, estimates were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the fixed or random effects method. In continuous data, differences were pooled across resulting in a weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. Main results and the role of chance Six eligible RCTs (n = 1081) were identified, published between 1991-2023. In three trials, conventional insemination was used for fertilization, in two trials this was performed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), whereas in one trial either conventional insemination or ICSI were used. The time intervals between triggering final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval compared, varied between studies (34.5-36 vs 38.5-40h, 33 vs 41h, 34 vs 38h, 35 vs 37h, 34 vs 39h and 36 vs 38h). Patients were grouped in advance based on these time intervals (short interval group: 33-36h versus long interval group: 37-41h). Ovarian stimulation was performed with GnRH analogues (GnRH antagonists:1 GnRH agonists:5) and gonadotrophins (HMG:4 recombinant FSH:2, while triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed with hCG( recombinant hCG:1 urinary hCG:5). None of the studies was deemed as of low risk of bias. No statistically significant differences were observed between the short nd long interval groups regarding clinical pregnancy rate per randomized patient (RR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.62-1.11; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2:36.4%; five studies, 827 patients). Furthermore, it was not feasible to pool any of the secondary outcome data. This was either because they were not reported, or due to the fact that they were reported inappropriately. Limitations, reasons for caution This meta-analysis included a limited number of RCTs, which were generally of low quality due to methodological limitations and of high risk of bias. Moreover, the total number of patients is still not large enough to draw solid conclusions. Wider implications of the findings Taking into account the limitations of the current meta-analysis, it appears that clinicians may elect a shorter (33–36 h) or a longer (37-41h) interval regarding the timing of oocyte retrieval following triggering final oocyte maturation, without affecting clinical pregnancy rate. Trial registration number PROSPERO: CRD42024501986

P-666 Comparison of IVF outcomes in women undergoing IVF stimulation using progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) Vs GnRH antagonist (GnRH-Antag) protocol

Abstract Study question Can PPOS achieve improved patient &amp; provider satisfaction while simultaneously blocking LH-surge, maintaining similar IVF outcomes like oocyte/embryo yield/clinical pregnancy rates(CPR) when compared to GnRH-Antag? Summary answer PPOS can achieve similar IVF outcomes as compared to GnRH-Antag protocol and is a patient friendly, cost-effective choice for ovarian stimulation without affecting oocyte/embryo yield/CPR. What is known already GnRH-Antag protocol is among the most widely used methods, as it blocks LH surge &amp; significantly lowers the risk of OHSS [Lambalk CB,2017]. However, this protocol has disadvantages like frequent monitoring, dose adjustment, high therapeutic cost and multiple injections[Ata B,2015]. PPOS successfully prevents ovulation and provides comparable IVFoutcomes (oocyte yield, blastocyst/euploid embryo rates, CPR) along with patient cost savings and increased convenience across all infertility diagnoses [Annalyn M.Welp, 2023]. It should be noted that most studies are non-randomized and comprise low to moderate-quality evidence. However, the consistency of the findings across different studies from different centres provides assurance in effect estimates. Study design, size, duration A retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care fertility unit. Data for 449 women aged 21 to 40 years undergoing IVF stimulation using PPOS (n = 226) and GnRH-Antag (n = 223) protocol was retrieved from the hospital’s electronic database and analysed for a period between September 2022 to October 2023. Study population consisted of women undergoing freeze-all strategy either for lowering the risk of OHSS (hyper-responders) or for embryo pooling in view of very low ovarian reserve. Participants/materials, setting, methods For both groups either rFSH/rLH/HMG were used &amp; doses were indivisualised based on patient’s age, BMI &amp; ovarian reserve. PPOS group received twice daily dose of medroxyprogesterone acetate tablet(10 mg)/dydrogesterone(10 mg) from Day2 of cycle. GnRH-Antag group received Inj.Cetrorelix acetate (0.25 mg) daily as flexible protocol. Final oocyte maturation was induced with Triptorelin(0.2mg)/Choriogonadotropin alfa(250mcg)/both, once 2-3follicles reached 18-20mm. Transvaginal oocyte pick-up was performed 35-36h later. Women in PPOS group underwent freeze-all strategy followed by Frozen-Thawed Embryo-transfer. Main results and the role of chance Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using independent t-test, and categorical variables were compared by χ2 and Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate. Patient demographics, clinical/ovarian stimulation characteristics, embryological and IVF outcomes were compared for two groups. Patient demographics {Age(p-value:0.08), BMI(p-value:0.06), duration(p-value:0.09)/type(p-value:0.76) of infertlity}, total gonadotropin dose (p-value: 0.39) and duration of ovarian stimulation (p-value: 0.81) were comparable between the two groups. Though the mean LH level on trigger day was slightly higher in PPOS group (5.53 IU/L) than GnRH-Antag group (3.24 IU/L) (p-value: 0.02), statistically significant difference was not seen in the oocyte yield (p-value: 0.18), M-II oocytes (p-value: 0.17) &amp; fertilization rate (p-value: 0.23) in the two groups. The number of Day3 (p-value: 0.65), Day5 (p-value: 0.07) &amp; Day6 (p-value: 0.08) embryos available in the two groups were also comparable. IVF outcomes in terms of positive B-HCG result (p-value: 0.68), clinical pregnancy rate (p-value: 0.61) &amp; miscarriage rate (p-value: 0.27) showed no statistically significant difference in the two groups. Thus, we conclude that PPOS can achieve similar IVF outcomes as compared to the GnRH-Antag protocol, while at the same time proving to be patient friendly by reducing the need of multiple injection pricks, injection cost and the frequency of hospital visits. Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective study and hence randomized comparison was not possible. PPOS can be used only when freeze-all strategy is planned, fresh embryo-transfer cannot be considered if need arises depending upon embryo quality. IVF service providers have to depend on patient compliance for using oral progestins to block LH-surge. Wider implications of the findings Study findings suggest that PPOS is a patient friendly and equally effective and safe IVF stimulation protocol when compared to GnRH-Antagonist. More RCT will be useful for investigating different aspects of PPOS (it’s utility for women with different ovarian reserve functions, conventional versus flexible approach, optimal dose of each progestin). Trial registration number Not applicable

P-598 Novel inactivating homozygous mutation of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) and first live birth after in vitro maturation (IVM): a breakthrough

Abstract Study question How can pregnancy and live birth be achieved in patients with inactivating homozygous luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) mutation? Summary answer We report the first live birth after IVM in a patient with a novel homozygous inactivating LHCGR mutation (exon 6,c.470A&amp;gt;G). What is known already LH plays a fundamental role in female reproductive physiology and is responsible for steroidogenesis, oocyte maturation, ovulation and subsequent progesterone production by the corpus luteum. LH binds to the LHCGR located on the membrane of theca cells and mature granulosa cells. Inactivating mutations of the LHCG receptor lead to the impossibility to obtain final oocyte maturation both during natural cycles and after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization purpose. Until now, egg donation represented the only option to treat their infertility. Study design, size, duration A case report. Participants/materials, setting, methods A 35 year-old nulliparous patient was referred to our university hospital for primary infertility. Main results and the role of chance The 35-year-old nulliparous patient presented with primary spaniomenorrhea but timely and spontaneous onset of secondary sexual characteristics. Serum LH levels were high (ranging from 15 to 30 IU/L) and to a lesser extent so were FSH levels. The ovarian reserve was normal for age, as assessed by serum AMH levels and ultrasound. There was no argument for polycystic ovarian syndrome, 21-hydroxylase deficiency, Cushing’s syndrome or hyperprolactinemia. Two previous attempts of controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and ovulation trigger with hCG and GnRH-agonist trigger had failed, resulting in low estradiol levels despite correct follicular growth on ultrasound and absence of ovulation after trigger. We identified by genetic analysis a novel homozygous inactivating LHCGR mutation (exon 6, c.470A&amp;gt;G) that had never been described previously. IVM was performed. A total of 7 oocytes were obtained after IVM, resulting in 4 Day 3 embryos. All embryos were frozen. Subsequently, 2 Day 3 embryos were replaced after endometrial preparation by hormone replacement therapy. The patient became pregnant and gave birth to a healthy baby. Two Day 3 embryos remain. Limitations, reasons for caution By definition, a case-report requires further studies to confirm our findings. Wider implications of the findings We describe a novel inactivating LHCGR mutation with subsequent live birth after IVM. As a growing number of gonadotropin receptor mutations are identified, this live birth successfully obtained places IVM as the only reliable option for these patients to conceive with their own eggs. Trial registration number not applicable

P-612 Euploidy rates between cycles triggered with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and dual trigger

Abstract Study question Is there any difference in euploidy rates between in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles triggered with GnRHa, hCG or dual trigger? Summary answer There is no difference in the euploidy rate in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles according to the trigger method used. What is known already The use of PGT-A has shown that the success of meiosis in the IVF laboratory is inversely correlated with maternal age. However, other uninvestigated factors involved in the IVF process may interfere with normal oocyte physiology. Since the final maturation obtained after ovarian stimulation depends on the use of drugs to promote the resumption of meiosis, it is worth investigating whether the triggering method could impact on oocyte and embryo euploidy. This study aims is to evaluate differences in embryo euploidy rates between PGT-A cycles triggered with GnRHa, hCG or dual trigger (GnRHa + hCG). Study design, size, duration This is a single-center retrospective study of 934 patients who underwent 1085 PGT-A cycles by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) from January 2017 to December 2023, using one of three possible trigger methods to induce final oocyte maturation: GnRHa, hCG, or dual trigger. The couples included in the study had normal karyotypes and no severe male factor. Participants/materials, setting, methods Data on the number of oocytes retrieved, ratio of metaphase II (MII) oocytes and fertilization rate, blastocyst development and embryo euploidy were assessed and compared between the GnRHa, hCG and dual trigger treatments. A secondary analysis was performed to evaluate data stratified by patient age. Main results and the role of chance A total of 1085 PGT-A cycles involving 934 patients (38.07 ± 3.01 years) and 2803 biopsied blastocysts were included in the analysis. Dual trigger was used in 726 (77.73%) cycles, GnRHa in 287 (26,4%) cycles and hCG in 72 (7.71%) cycles. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the GnRHa group (GnRHa: 18.72 ± 8.59; hCG: 9.88 ± 5.64; dual trigger: 10.58 ± 5.65; p &amp;lt; 0.001) with similar maturation rate (GnRHa: 77.46%; hCG: 74.58%; dual trigger: 76.03%; p = 0.789), fertilization rate (GnRHa: 78.12%; hCG: 76.37%; dual trigger: 79.12%; p = 0.168), blastulation rate (GnRHa: 61.03%; hCG: 58.32%; dual trigger: 58.73%; p = 0,629), high-quality blastocyst rate (GnRHa: 27,88%; hCG: 33,67%; dual trigger: 27,88%; p = 0.543) and embryo euploidy per biopsied embryo (GnRHa: 42.48%; hCG:45.49%; dual trigger:46.98%; p = 0.112). Analysis of the data stratified by age showed similar rates of euploidy rates with the three trigger methods in women younger than 41 years (&amp;lt;35 years: GnRHa 66.50%; hCG 66.67%; dual trigger 56.97% p = 0.290; 35-37 years: GnRHa 49.45% hCG 51.04%; dual trigger 50.23%; p = 0.988; 38-40 years: GnRHa 40.93%; hCG 41.27%; dual trigger 39.13% p = 0.257). However, in patients ≥41 years old the euploidy rate was statistically higher in the GnRHa group (GnRH 31.51%; hCG 18.75%; dual trigger 16.89%; p = 0.032). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitations of the study are: its retrospective design, the possibility that the trigger method was chosen based on the ovarian response and the limited number of patients in both the hCG trigger and women ≥ 41 years groups. Wider implications of the findings Our results suggest that triggering with GnRHa, hCG or dual trigger leads to comparable euploidy rates. Triggering with GnRHa should be recommended in older patients since it has been associated with a higher rate of embryonic euploidy. Trial registration number Not Applicable

Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG (double trigger) for final oocyte maturation increases the number of top-quality embryos in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles

BackgroundThe utilization of a double trigger, involving the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation, is emerging as a novel approach in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). This protocol involves administering GnRH-a and hCG 40 and 34 h prior to ovum pick-up (OPU), respectively. This treatment modality has been implemented in patients with low/poor oocytes yield. This study aimed to determine whether the double trigger could improve the number of top-quality embryos (TQEs) in patients with fewer than three TQEs.MethodsThe stimulation characteristics of 35 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were analyzed. These cycles were triggered by the combination of hCG and GnRHa (double trigger cycles) and compared to the same patients’ previous IVF attempt, which utilized the hCG trigger (hCG trigger control cycles). The analysis involved cases who were admitted to our reproductive center between January 2018 and December 2022. In the hCG trigger control cycles, all 35 patients had fewer than three TQEs.ResultsPatients who received the double trigger cycles yielded a significantly higher number of 2PN cleavage embryos (3.54 ± 3.37 vs. 2.11 ± 2.15, P = 0.025), TQEs ( 2.23 ± 2.05 vs. 0.89 ± 0.99, P < 0.001), and a simultaneously higher proportion of the number of cleavage stage embryos (53.87% ± 31.38% vs. 39.80% ± 29.60%, P = 0.043), 2PN cleavage stage embryos (43.89% ± 33.01% vs. 27.22% ± 27.13%, P = 0.014), and TQEs (27.05% ± 26.26% vs. 14.19% ± 19.76%, P = 0.019) to the number of oocytes retrieved compared with the hCG trigger control cycles, respectively. The double trigger cycles achieved higher rates of cumulative clinical pregnancy (20.00% vs. 2.86%, P = 0.031), cumulative persistent pregnancy (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and cumulative live birth (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) per stimulation cycle compared with the hCG trigger control cycles.ConclusionCo-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 h prior to OPU, respectively (double trigger) may be suggested as a valuable new regimen for treating patients with low TQE yield in previous hCG trigger IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Automated Piezo-Assisted Sperm Immobilization

Sperm immobilization is a crucial procedure in clinical cell surgery for infertility treatment. Current immobilization is implemented by tapping the sperm tail with a glass micropipette, but its effectiveness is restricted by sperm orientation and ineffective membrane ablation. Ineffective ablation leads to limited release of oocyte activating factors and lowers fertilization rate; and sperm swim in small angles relative to the micropipette tip cannot be tapped due to the risk of damaging the sperm’s genetic materials contained in the sperm head. This paper reports automated piezo-assisted sperm immobilization with enhanced efficacy of cell membrane ablation and sperm orientation control. The designed piezo drill consists of two orthogonal vibration modules to generate controlled micropipette vibration along axial and lateral axes. Through stiffness modeling, the flexure joints guide the motion of the central beam of each vibration module. To achieve sperm orientation control, whirl flow is induced by both axial and lateral vibration of the micropipette tip. To immobilize sperm, only micropipette’s axial vibration is generated to prevent lateral vibration from damaging sperm head. A visual servoing scheme is developed by decoupling sperm wiggling from positioning error for immobilization. Experimental results showed that sperm orientation control by the piezo drill achieved an error of 1.4 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{\circ}$</tex-math> </inline-formula> and a time cost of 2.5 s. Visual servoing with sperm wiggling decoupling achieved a positioning error of 1.7 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu$</tex-math> </inline-formula> m. Furthermore, the piezo-assisted sperm immobilization technique led to effective membrane ablation. With membrane-impermeable stains, it took 5.6 s for the immobilized sperm to be stained after piezo-assisted immobilization, significantly less than 49.2 s by conventional micropipette tapping. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Note to Practitioners</i> —This work tackled the challenge of ineffective membrane ablation and orientation limit in clinical cell surgeries. Conventional manual immobilization suffers from low membrane ablation efficacy, which leads to limited release of oocyte activating factors and lowers fertilization rate. Moreover, sperm swim in small angles relative to the micropipette tip cannot be tapped due to the risk of damaging the sperm’s genetic materials contained in the sperm head. In this paper, we propose automation techniques for effective membrane ablation and orientation control of sperm. A clinically compatible piezo drill is developed to generate controllable micropipette motion along both axial and lateral directions. The whirl flow generated by micropipette vibration is employed to rotate sperm, which greatly increased the number of available sperm for immobilization. A visual servoing controller is developed to keep the sperm at the center of field of view for immobilization by decoupling sperm wiggling from positioning error. The developed methods can be generalized to the manipulation of other types of cells. The piezo drill can be used for effective membrane ablation of oocyte, embryo, yeast cell and so on. The orientation control strategy leveraging piezo-induced whirl flow is applicable to non-contact rotation of a variety of microorganism.

A CLINICAL STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF JYOTISHMATYADI KALKA IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NASHTARTAVA W.S.R TO ANOVULATION

Ovulation is the process of release of an oocyte from the ovarian follicle. As mentioned earlier, it occurs on day 14 of the menstrual cycle. After the description of Ashtartava, Sushruta describes the destruction of Artava, i.e. Nashtartava, Bhavprakasha mentioned as Rajonasha, caused due to margavarodha in artavavaha srotas, by vata and kapha. Sushruta explains the ritukala in such a manner. The first 12 days of ritukala is kapha kala that means maturation of follicle from day 12-16 is considered pitta kala that means the rupture of follicle and release of a secondary oocyte. Many works have been done on Nashtartava, but Jyotishmatyadi kalka, indicated by Bhavprakasha as Kusumam Janyate, is still untouched. Hence, a non-hormonal and safer method has been selected.

Effect of temperature and spawning agents on wild female asp (Leuciscus aspius) reproductive efficiency under controlled conditions

Artificial reproduction is a bottleneck to produce stocking material for many species of freshwater fish. One of these species is the asp, Leuciscus aspius. Research in the field of artificial reproduction of this species is very scarce and often incomplete. There are no breeding protocols specifying optimal environmental conditions and hormonal stimulation for many species of rheophilic cyprinids, including asp. Since the number of natural asp populations is constantly decreasing, it is important to support natural stocks by restocking with high quality stocking material. For this reason, optimized protocols are needed to breed this species under controlled conditions to produce stocking material with high biodiversity and good health. Such an approach will make it possible to maintain the population of natural asp at a constant level. The aim of this study was to develop the protocol of asp artificial reproduction using optimized thermal conditions and appropriate hormonal stimulation. In experiment I, the influence of constant temperature (10.0, 12.0 and 14.0 °C) on the effectiveness of artificial reproduction of asp. In experiment II, the effectiveness of asp reproduction was checked after the application of spawning agents: Ovopel, Ovaprim or a combination of these two agents The obtained results indicate that for the final maturation of oocytes (FOM) and artificial reproduction of asp in controlled conditions, water temperatures of 10–12 °C are the most useful. Under these thermal conditions, the highest percentages of female’s ovulation and embryo survival, as well as the percentage of hatching, were obtained. Hormone injections are necessary to perform final oocyte maturation (FOM) in female asp in captivity. All spawning agents used were especially useful for artificial reproduction of asp, however, the best values of the studied indices, such as ovulation rate and embryo survival, were obtained after the application of Ovaprim or the combination of Ovopel and Ovaprim in water temperature at a range of 10–12 °C. It was found that the pH of ovarian fluid may be a preliminary indicator of the biological quality of eggs in asps. The optimal pH value is 8.0–8.4. At pH below 7.4, no viable embryos were observed.

Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger therapy with GnRH agonist and hCG versus hCG trigger in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective study

BackgroundDiminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is one of the obstacles affecting the reproductive outcomes of patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether dual trigger, including gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with DOR undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using mild stimulation protocols.MethodsA total of 734 patients with DOR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into a recombinant hCG trigger group and a dual trigger group (hCG combined with GnRHa) according to the different trigger drugs used. The main outcome measures included the number of oocytes retrieved, the fertilization rate, the number of transferable embryos, the implantation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate, the miscarriage rate, the live birth rate (LBR), and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Generalized linear model and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors.ResultsThere were 337 cycles with a single hCG trigger and 397 cycles with dual trigger. The dual trigger group demonstrated significantly higher numbers of retrieved oocytes [3.60 vs. 2.39, adjusted β = 0.538 (0.221–0.855)], fertilized oocytes [2.55 vs. 1.94, adjusted β = 0.277 (0.031–0.523)] and transferable embryos [1.22 vs. 0.95, adjusted β = 0.162 (-0.005–0.329)] than did the hCG trigger group, whereas no significant difference in the fertilization rate was observed between the two groups. Moreover, the embryo transfer cancellation rate (35.5% vs. 43.9%) was obviously lower in the dual trigger group. Among the fresh embryo transfer cycles, the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate were similar between the two groups. After controlling for potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the number of oocytes retrieved but had no significant impact on the CLBR.ConclusionsDual triggering of final oocyte maturation with hCG combined with GnRHa can significantly increase the number of oocytes retrieved in patients with DOR but has no improvement effect on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate or LBR of fresh cycles or on the CLBR.

Is Endometrial Receptivity Affected in Women With Endometriosis? Results From a Matched Pair Case-Control Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatments

(Abstracted from Reprod Biomed Online 2023;47:103414 Endometriosis is a well-established risk factor for infertility due to alterations in folliculogenesis, oocyte release from the ovaries, tubal function, and oocyte fertilization. In addition, it has been hypothesized that the presence of an abnormal endometrium, a known consequence of endometriosis, may impair embryo implantation leading to impaired pregnancy outcomes.

Role of steroid hormones in the maintenance of focal adhesions in bovine oviductal epithelial cells

The oviduct, the organ of the female reproductive system where fertilization and early embryonic development occur, provides an optimal environment for the final maturation of oocytes, storage, and sperm capacitation and transport of gametes and embryos. During the estrous cycle, the oviduct is affected by ovarian sex hormones, resulting in changes aimed at maintaining an appropriate microenvironment. Normal cell migration is tightly regulated, its role being essential for the development and maintenance of organ and tissue functions as well as for regeneration following injury. Due to their involvement in focal contact formations, focal adhesion kinase (PTK2) and paxillin (PXN) are key proteins in the study of cell migration and adhesion. The objective of this work was to compare the expression of PTK2 and PXN in oviductal cells along the estrous cycle and to determine if their expression is regulated by the presence of 17-β estradiol (E2) and/or progesterone (P4). No transcripts of PTK2 or of PXN were detected in cells corresponding to the luteal phase. Additionally, hormonal stimulation experiments on bovine oviductal cell cultures (BOECs) were carried out, where P4 inhibited the expression of both genes. Migration assays demonstrated that P4 reduced BOECs migration capacity. P4 treatment also reduced cell adhesion, while E2 increased the number of adhered cells. In conclusion, the presence of E2 and P4 regulates the expression of genes involved in the formation of focal contacts and modifies the migration and adhesion of BOECs. Understanding the effect of steroid hormones on BOECs is critical to grasp the impact of steroid control on oviductal function and its contribution to establishing successful pregnancies.

#287 : A Comparison of hCG Trigger Versus Dual Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing Minimal Stimulation

Background and Aims: Traditionally, hCG has been used for oocyte triggering. However, women with poor ovarian response manifest low oocyte yield and compromised occyte quality. More recently, a combination of hCG and GnRHa (dual trigger) has been shown to improve follcile collection yield and oocyte maturation. The aim of the study is tocompare the result of final oocyte maturation and the embryo formation between two groups of poor ovarian responders undergoing minimal stimulation after triggering by hCG alone versus dual trigger. Method: This randomized control trial was conducted at National Assisted Reproductive Center, National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Patients defined as poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria were equally divided into two groups: control (hCG trigger) and investigation (dual trigger) groups. The group received the hCG trigger (6500 IU) and the investigation group received the dual trigger (0.2 mg of Triptorelin plus 6500 IU of hCG). Minimal stimulation IVF protocols consist of 5 days of 100mg clomiphene citrate and small amounts of gonadotropin. Results: One hundred and two patients were included in the study, with 51 women in each treatment group. Dual triggering showed a significant higher number of retrieved oocytes (5.35 ± 3.13 vs 4.35 ± 2.44, P=0.038) and metaphase II oocytes (4.25 ± 3.12 vs 3.35 ± 2.02, P=0.043). Although not reaching statistical significances, increases in the number of fertilized oocytes, embryos, and number of top-quality embryos (TQE) were observed. Conclusion: Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation is associated with better IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders undergoing minimal stimulation. Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to all physicians, administrative staff at the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Center, National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vietnam for allowing and supporting us to undertake this research.

#100 : Can the Dual Trigger be Effective in Improving Oocyte Maturation and Embryo Quality Compared to the HCG Trigger or the GnRH-a Trigger?

Background and Aims: HCG was the standard trigger of final oocyte maturation in IVF cycles. An alternative trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) was effective in reducing OHSS. But GnRH-a trigger induced increased luteal insufficiency and cycle cancellation. A dual trigger (HCG with GnRH-a) was introduced to reduce OHSS, luteal insufficiency and cycle cancellation. This study was designed to compare the effect of dual trigger on final oocyte maturation n embryo quality with conventional HCG trigger and GnRH-a trigger. Method: We conducted this retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IVF antagonist cycles from Jan. 2020 to Dec. 2022. Patients undergoing their oocyte retrieval 36 hours after trigger with only HCG 10,000 units, or only leuprolide acetate 40 units, or a dual trigger of HCG 5000 units with leuprolide acetate 40 units. Male factor infertility and oocyte donor cycle were excluded. The main outcomes were retrieved mature oocyte rate and fertilization rate. Secondary outcomes include implantation rate and pregnancy rate. Results: Total 3266 patients were included. Dual trigger was in 2279, GnRH-a in 282 and HCG in 705 cycles. Patients using GnRH-a were younger (33.7± 4.0 years) compared to those receiving dual trigger (37.8±2.3 years) and HCG only (37.2±3.2 years) (p&lt;0.01). Because GnRH-a groups were younger, despite low total gonadotropin dose, the larger number of oocytes were retrieved. Dual trigger resulted in no difference in mature oocyte ratio, compared to HCG trigger and GnRH-a trigger (63.0%, 58.3%, 62.8% p: 0.074). Analysis did not show any statistical differences in fertilization rate between the types of triggering methods. Cycel cancellation due to no oocyte recovered from multiple follicles aspirated was shown only in GnRH-a cycle (6 cases. 2.1%). Conclusion: Compared to HCG trigger and GnRH-a trigger, the dual trigger showed no difference in mature oocyte rate and fertilization rate. To reduce OHSS and cycle cancellations, dual trigger could be considered the standard care in IVF without decreasing oocyte quality.