A high-quality Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging system has been FDA approved for imaging guidance and dose calculation in radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the relative electron density in CBCT images acquired in this CBCT imaging system in a phantom study and its dosimetric impact on treatment planning in a patient study. Astoichiometric CT calibration was performed with a CIRS phantom (SunNuclear, Model 062M) to generate the HU-electron density curve for two tube voltages, 125kVp and 140 kVp, respectively. The phantom has a longitudinal length of 26.5 cm and is equipped with interchangeable inserts of various compositions, supplied by the vendor. Measurements were taken with solid water plates added to both ends of the phantom to allow adequate scattering and repeated for various clinical protocols with different combinations of tube voltages and exposures. The accuracy of the relative electron density of the CBCT imaging system was verified by comparing the calculated electron density from the Hounsfield Units (HU) measurements obtained from a Gammex phantom to the relative electron densities provided in vendor's specifications. To benchmark the relative electron density of the CBCT imaging system against a standard helical CT simulator, ten clinical plans that were created on CT simulation images were copied and recalculated on the CBCT images acquired immediately after the CT simulation, the latter of which was a standard procedure in current radiotherapy care for all patients who had given their consent to participate in the IRB-approved imaging study. The dose grids used in these calculations were 2.5mm x 2.5mm x 3mm. The Gamma passing rate was calculated using a standard 3mm/3% criterion with a 10% threshold. Ourresults showed the difference between the averaged CBCT calibration curves acquired at tube voltages of 125 kVP and 140 kVp was less than 2%. The mean discrepancy of the relative electron densities from vendor's specification was 0.0045 with a range between -0.02 and 0.04. Relative electron densities in all inserts were within 2% from the vendor's specifications except the cortical bone insert. Gamma passing rate was between 96.02% and 98.49% with mean value of 97.4% and a standard deviation of 0.95%. We consider this reflects the fact that the CT simulation and CBCT imaging were performed in separated rooms, which resulted in slight anatomical deformation that could negatively impact the Gamma passing rate. The CBCT imaging system provides sufficient accuracy of electron density for dose calculation, and the dose distribution calculated on the CBCT images is clinically equivalent to those calculated on helical CT images. The enhanced imaging quality of CBCT could further extend the role of imaging guidance to planning for adaptive radiotherapy, potentially reducing the need for re-simulation and interruptions in the radiotherapy course.
Read full abstract