Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Research Articles

Abstract A120: A Phase Ib study of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) as a priming agent for carboplatin or NAB-paclitaxel in subjects with relapsed and refractory solid tumors.

Abstract Background: CC-486, an oral formulation of 5-azacitidine, induces global genomic hypomethylation and clinical responses in MDS patients at doses of 200 mg and 300 mg/day for 14 or 21/28 days with acceptable safety. This non-randomized, multi-center Phase Ib study was designed to determine whether CC-486 can be delivered safely as priming for carboplatin or NAB-Paclitaxel (ABI-007) in patients with solid tumors. Methods: In Part 1 of this study, patients with refractory solid tumors were assigned to Arm A: CC-486 days 1 - 14 with carboplatin AUC 4 on day 8 of a 21 day cycle (n = 13) or Arm B: CC-486 days 1 - 14 with ABI-007 100 mg/m2 given weekly starting on Day 8 of Cycle 1 (n = 24). 200 mg and 300 mg dose levels (DLs) of CC-486 were evaluated in cohorts of 6 to identify a recommended Part 2 dose (RP2D). Results: On Arm A, 200 mg and 300 mg doses of CC-486 were tolerated. There was one DLT (Grade 3 pericardial effusion) at the 300 mg DL. Other related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included anemia (53.8%) and neutropenia (46.3%). On Arm B, there were 2 DLTs of neutropenia at the 200 mg DL. The protocol was amended to give ABI-007 on days 8 and 15/21. No DLTs were encountered on 200 mg of CC-486 with intermittent ABI-007. At 300 mg, the MTD was exceeded with 2 DLTs of neutropenia (cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic). Other common TEAEs in Arm B included nausea/vomiting (45.8%) and peripheral neuropathy (50%). Evidence of activity seen at both DLs included hypomethylation in PBMCs, 3 PRs in Arm B and 5 subjects with stable disease (> 4 mos) in Arm A. CC-486 plasma exposure showed high interpatient variability but was higher at 300 mg than 200 mg. Incidence and severity of AEs did not differ significantly between the 2 DLs. 300 mg was selected as the RP2D in combination with carboplatin and 200 mg in combination with ABI-007. Conclusion: CC-486 dosed 14/21 days is tolerated as a priming agent with carboplatin and ABI-007. Both combinations show evidence of clinical activity. Expansion cohorts at the RP2D of Arm A (relapsed/refractory bladder or ovarian carcinoma) and Arm B (relapsed/refractory NSCLC or pancreatic carcinoma) are enrolling to further characterize safety, PK/PD and anti-tumor activity. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):A120. Citation Format: Patricia LoRusso, Drew Rasco, Johanna Bendell, Jasgit Sachdev, Ramesh Ramanathan, Glenn Weiss, Pamela Munster, William J. Edenfield, Kejian Liu, Anne Blackwood-Chirchir, Jorge DiMartino, Jorge DiMartino, Daniel D. Von Hoff. A Phase Ib study of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) as a priming agent for carboplatin or NAB-paclitaxel in subjects with relapsed and refractory solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A120.

Randomized Clinical Trial: Macrogol/PEG 3350 Plus Electrolytes for Treatment of Patients With Constipation Associated With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 plus electrolytes (PEG 3350+E) is an established treatment for constipation and has been proposed as a treatment option for constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PEG 3350+E vs. placebo in adult patients with IBS-C. Following a 14-day run-in period without study medication, patients with confirmed IBS-C were randomized to receive PEG 3350+E (N=68) or placebo (N=71) for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the mean number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per day in the last treatment week. In both groups, mean weekly number of SBMs (±s.d.) increased from run-in. The difference between the groups in week 4 (PEG 3350+E, 4.40±2.581; placebo, 3.11±1.937) was statistically significant (95% confidence interval: 1.17, 1.95; P<0.0001). Although mean severity score for abdominal discomfort/pain was significantly reduced compared with run-in with PEG 3350+E, there was no difference vs. placebo. Spontaneous complete bowel movements, responder rates, stool consistency, and severity of straining also showed superior improvement in the PEG 3350+E group over placebo in week 4. The most common drug related treatment-emergent adverse events were abdominal pain (PEG 3350+E, 4.5%; placebo, 0%) and diarrhoea (PEG 3350+E, 4.5%; placebo, 4.3%). In IBS-C, PEG 3350+E was superior to placebo for relief of constipation, and although a statistically significant improvement in abdominal discomfort/pain was observed compared with baseline, there was no associated improvement compared with placebo. PEG 3350+E is a well-established and effective treatment that should be considered suitable for use in IBS-C.

THU0223 The Novel CPLA2 Inhibitor AK106-001616 is a New Category of Anti-Inflammatory/Analgesic Drug Demonstrating Efficacy and Favorable Tolerability in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

BackgroundAK106-001616 (AK106) is a selective cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action as an anti-inflammatory/analgesic drug. Unlike non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), AK106 inhibits the production of...

A Long-Term Open-Label Extension Study Assessing Cognition and Behavior, Tolerability, Safety, and Efficacy of Adjunctive Levetiracetam in Children Aged 4 to 16 Years With Partial-Onset Seizures

The objective of this study was to assess cognition and behavior in children (4-16 years; n = 103) with partial-onset seizures using the Leiter-R International Performance Scale and Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist. The study was a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative 48-week extension study (NCT00152516) of adjunctive levetiracetam (20-100 mg/kg/d, mean 50.2 mg/kg/d). Improvement from baseline in Leiter-R Memory Screen composite score at weeks 24 and 48 (mean [SD] change, +4.8 [12.6] and +4.5 [15.3]) was similar to changes observed with levetiracetam and placebo in a prior study. Child Behavior Checklist Syndrome scores improved from baseline at weeks 24 and 48 (total problems mean [SD] change, -9.3 [22.2] and -10.4 [23.4]). Adjunctive levetiracetam was well tolerated (most frequently reported central nervous system-related treatment-emergent adverse events: headache [24.3%], aggression [7.8%], irritability [7.8%]). Of the patients, 4.9% discontinued because of treatment-emergent adverse events. Levetiracetam provided good and sustained seizure control (median percentage reduction from baseline in partial-onset seizure frequency/wk during maintenance: 86.4%); 24.7% of patients had continuous seizure freedom from all seizure types for ≥40 weeks. In children, adjunctive levetiracetam was associated with long-term stability in cognitive functioning and improvement in emotional/behavioral functioning over time.

Improved Glycemic Control with Insulin Glargine Versus Pioglitazone as Add-On Therapy to Sulfonylurea or Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

To compare glycemic control with add-on insulin glargine versus pioglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. This 48-week, multicenter, parallel-group, open-label study randomized 389 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin A1c [A1C], 8.0% to 12.0%), despite > or =3 months of sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy, to receive add-on therapy with insulin glargine or pioglitazone. Outcomes included A1C change from baseline to end point (primary), percentage of patients achieving A1C levels < or =7.0%, and changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, weight, and serum lipids. The safety analysis included incidence of adverse events and rates of hypoglycemia. At end point, insulin glargine yielded a significantly greater reduction in A1C in comparison with pioglitazone (-2.48% versus -1.86%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -0.93 to -0.31; P = .0001, 48-week modified intent-to-treat population). Insulin glargine also yielded significantly greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose at all time points (end point difference, -34.9 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval, -47.6 to -22.2; P<.0001). In comparison with pioglitazone, insulin glargine resulted in a lower overall incidence of possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events (12.0% versus 20.7%) and fewer study discontinuations (2.2% versus 9.1%), but a higher rate (per patient-year) of confirmed clinically relevant hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose <70 mg/dL and all severe hypoglycemia) (4.97 versus 1.04; P<.0001) and severe hypoglycemia (0.07 versus 0.01; P = .0309). Weight and body mass index changes were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The addition of insulin glargine early in the diabetes treatment paradigm in patients for whom sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy had failed resulted in significantly greater improvements in glycemic control in comparison with the addition of pioglitazone. Although severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in patients with insulin glargine therapy, hypoglycemic events occurred in <5% of patients in the insulin glargine treatment group.

Levofloxacin 500 mg once daily versus cefuroxime 250 mg twice daily in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis: clinical efficacy and exacerbation-free interval

The long-term outcome time to relapse determined as the exacerbation-free interval (EFI) has been proposed as a standard measure for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial therapies in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive bronchitis (AECOB). In this 6-month, randomised, open-label study, the efficacy of 10 days of oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily or cefuroxime 250 mg twice daily was evaluated in 689 well-defined patients experiencing AECOB episodes. In the clinically evaluable per-protocol (PPc) population and the modified intent-to-treat population, the clinical cure rates at test of cure were, respectively, 94.6% for levofloxacin versus 93.8% for cefuroxime (0.8% difference, 95% confidence interval (CI) −3.2 to 4.8) and 94.5% for levofloxacin versus 92.2% for cefuroxime (2.3% difference, 95% CI −1.8 to 6.2), whilst the probability that 25% of patients would relapse during follow-up was reached within 93 days for levofloxacin compared with 81 days for cefuroxime in the PPc population ( P = 0.756). A multivariate analysis revealed that only congestive heart failure and number of AECOB episodes in the previous 12 months were predictive of relapse. Safety was comparable in the two treatment groups, with possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 5.0% and 2.9% of subjects in the levofloxacin and cefuroxime groups, respectively. In addition to demonstrating the non-inferiority of levofloxacin compared with cefuroxime in AECOB, the data from this study raise the question of whether EFI is a useful discriminative endpoint for comparing antimicrobial therapies.