Rehabilitation Medicine Summit Research Articles

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity—Executive Summary

The advancement of medical science depends on the production, availability, and utilization of new information generated by research. A successful research enterprise depends not only on a carefully designed agenda that responds to clinical and societal needs but also on the research capacity necessary to perform the work. Research that is likely to enhance clinical practice presupposes the existence of a critical mass of investigators working as teams in supportive environments. Unfortunately, far too little research capacity of that kind exists in rehabilitation medicine to ensure a robust future for the field. The “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity” was conceptualized as a way of fashioning a long-term plan to foster the required developments.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity: Executive Summary

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity (Executive Summary)

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (a) researchers; (b) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (c) funding; (d) partnerships; and (e) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A postsummit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity— Executive Summary

The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Prologue to “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity—Executive Summary”

The Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity (Summit) was held in Washington, DC, on April 28–29, 2005, with the general objective of advancing and promoting research in rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The idea of convening a research summit was conceived in 2002 by the Foundation for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). Under the leadership of Dr Gail Gamble, the Foundation invited the American Academy of PM&R, the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, and the Association of Academic Physiatrists to meet and discuss the concept of a national research summit to address issues related to building research capacity in rehabilitation. The group established a Summit Steering Committee composed of the leaders of the 4 organizations. The Summit Steering Committee then appointed a multidisciplinary Summit Program Committee (Program Committee), which included Walter Frontera (Chair, Harvard Medical School/Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital), Leighton Chan (University of Washington), Rory Cooper (University of Pittsburgh), Pamela Duncan (University of Florida), Marcus Fuhrer (National Institutes of Health), Alan Jette (Boston University), John Kemp (Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, PC), Kenneth Ottenbacher (University of Texas Medical Branch/Galveston), P Hunter Peckham (Case Western Reserve University), Elliot Roth (Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), and Denise Tate (University of Michigan). The Program Committee wrote the executive summary that begins on …

Rehabilitation medicine summit: building research capacity Executive Summary

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report (see Additional File 1).

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity. Executive Summary

Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW, Kemp JD, Ottenbacher KJ, Peckham PH, Roth EJ, Tate DG. Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity. Executive summary. The general objective of the “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity” was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were researchers; research culture, environment, and infrastructure; funding; partnerships; and metrics. Participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. Small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this article.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity

Summary: The general objective of the “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity” was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity–Executive Summary

The general objective of the “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity” was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1. researchers; 2. research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3. funding; 4. partnerships; and 5. metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity Executive Summary

The general objective of the “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity” was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity

The general objective of the “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity” was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Research Capacity Building: A True Action Agenda

In late April, I attended a meeting titled “Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity.” The overarching goal of the Summit was to discuss obstacles to and opportunities for research capacity building in the field of rehabilitation, and the intent was to bring together rehabilitation research leaders with others who have a stake in disability research. Attendees reviewed position papers prepared in advance of the Summit and, over 2 days, engaged in in-depth discussion. The specific objective of the Summit was to draft an action agenda that rehabilitation stakeholders could use to strengthen efforts to build research capacity in rehabilitation. For me, the meeting was remarkable in 2 important ways. First, the planning for this Summit and the composition of its attendees were truly inter-disciplinary. Attendance was by invitation and was limited to 100 invitees drawn from diverse groups, including researchers, practitioners, educators across all major rehabilitation disciplines, and representatives of government agencies and disability advocacy groups. All of the rehabilitation professions and major professional and consumer stakeholder groups received an invitation; most sent a representative to participate. The Foundation for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation spearheaded planning for the Summit and asked the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the …

Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacityExecutive Summary

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.