Regulators Of G Protein Signaling Proteins Research Articles

G Protein Regulation by RGS Proteins in the Pathophysiology of Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins finetune signaling via heterotrimeric G proteins to maintain physiologic homeostasis in various organ systems of the human body including the brain, kidney, heart, and the vasculature. Impaired regulation of G protein signaling by RGS proteins is implicated in the pathogenesis of several human diseases including various forms of cardiomyopathy such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Both genetic and non-genetic changes that impinge on G protein signaling in cardiomyocytes are implicated in the etiology of DCM, and there is accumulating evidence that such genetic and non-genetic changes affecting G protein signaling in cell types other than cardiomyocytes could serve as a DCM trigger in humans. This review discusses and highlights mammalian RGS proteins and their roles in cardiac physiology and disease, with specific focus on the current understanding of the etiology of DCM and the pathogenic roles of RGS proteins that are prominently expressed in the cardiovascular system. Growing evidence suggests that defects in G protein regulation by RGS proteins in the cardiovascular system likely contribute to cardiomyocyte structural damage and decreased contractile function that hallmark DCM. Further studies that enhance the understanding of the dynamics of G protein regulation by RGS proteins in several cell types in the myocardium and the vasculature are critical to gaining more insight into the etiology of DCM and heart failure, and to the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

Germline deletion of Rgs2 and/or Rgs5 in male mice does not exacerbate left ventricular remodeling induced by subchronic isoproterenol infusion

AbstractSympathoexcitation is a hallmark of heart failure, with sustained β‐adrenergic receptor (βAR)‐G protein signaling activation. βAR signaling is modulated by regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. Previously, we reported that Gαi/o regulation by RGS2 or RGS5 is key to ventricular rhythm regulation, while the dual loss of both RGS proteins results in left ventricular (LV) dilatation and dysfunction. Here, we tested whether sustained βAR stimulation with isoproterenol (ISO, 30 mg/kg/day, 3 days) exacerbates LV remodeling in male mice with germline deletion of Rgs2 and/or Rgs5. Rgs2 KO and Rgs2/5 dbKO mice showed LV dilatation at baseline, which was unchanged by ISO. Rgs2 or Rgs5 deletion decreased Rgs1 expression, whereas Rgs5 deletion increased Rgs4 expression. ISO induced cardiac hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis in Rgs2/5 dbKO mice without increasing cardiomyocyte size or LV dilation but increased expression of cardiac fetal gene Nppa, α‐actinin, and Ca2+‐/calmodulin‐dependent kinase II. Single Rgs2 and Rgs5 KO mice had markedly increased CD45+ cells, whereas tissue from Rgs5 KO mice showed increased CD68+ cells, as revealed by immunohistochemistry. The results together indicate that ventricular remodeling due to Rgs2 and/or Rgs5 deletion is associated with augmented myocardial immune cell presence but is not exacerbated by sustained βAR stimulation.

SymRK Regulates G-Protein Signaling During Nodulation in Soybean (Glycine max) by Modifying RGS Phosphorylation and Activity.

Molecular interspecies dialogue between leguminous plants and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia results in the development of symbiotic root nodules. This is initiated by several nodulation-related receptors present on the surface of root hair epidermal cells. We have shown previously that specific subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins and their associated regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins act as molecular links between the receptors and downstream components during nodule formation in soybeans. Nod factor receptor 1 (NFR1) interacts with and phosphorylates RGS proteins to regulate the G-protein cycle. Symbiosis receptor-like kinases (SymRK) phosphorylate Gα to make it inactive and unavailable for Gβγ. We now show that like NFR1, SymRK also interacts with the RGS proteins to phosphorylate them. Phosphorylated RGS has higher activity for accelerating guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis by Gα, which favors conversion of active Gα to its inactive form. Phosphorylation of RGS proteins is physiologically relevant, as overexpression of a phospho-mimic version of the RGS protein enhances nodule formation in soybean. These results reveal an intricate fine-tuning of the G-protein signaling during nodulation, where a negative regulator (Gα) is effectively deactivated by RGS due to the concerted efforts of several receptor proteins to ensure adequate nodulation. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

RGS Proteins in Sympathetic Nervous System Regulation: Focus on Adrenal RGS4.

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) consists largely of two different types of components: neurons that release the neurotransmitter norepinephrine (NE, noradrenaline) to modulate homeostasis of the innevrvated effector organ or tissue and adrenal chromaffin cells, which synthesize and secrete the hormone epinephrine (Epi, adrenaline) and some NE into the blood circulation to act at distant organs and tissues that are not directly innervated by the SNS. Like almost every physiological process in the human body, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) tightly modulate both NE release from sympathetic neuronal terminals and catecholamine (CA) secretion from the adrenal medulla. Regulator of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins, acting as guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating proteins (GAPs) for the Gα subunits of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), play a central role in silencing G protein signaling from a plethora of GPCRs. Certain RGS proteins and, in particular, RGS4, have been implicated in regulation of SNS activity and of adrenal chromaffin cell CA secretion. More specifically, recent studies have implicated RGS4 in regulation of NE release from cardiac sympathetic neurons by means of terminating free fatty acid receptor (FFAR)-3 calcium signaling and in regulation of NE and Epi secretion from the adrenal medulla by means of terminating cholinergic calcium signaling in adrenal chromaffin cells. Thus, in this review, we provide an overview of the current literature on the involvement of RGS proteins, with a particular focus on RGS4, in these two processes, i.e., NE release from sympathetic nerve terminals & CA secretion from adrenal chromaffin cells. We also highlight the therapeutic potential of RGS4 pharmacological manipulation for diseases characterized by sympathetic dysfunction or SNS hyperactivity, such as heart failure and hypertension.

In Silico Design of Novel RGS2-Galpha-q Interaction Inhibitors with Anticancer Activity.

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) are a family of approximately 30 proteins that bind to and deactivate the alpha subunits of G-proteins (Gα) by accelerating their GTP hydrolysis rates, which terminates G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Thus, RGS proteins are essential in regulating GPCR signaling, and most members are implicated as critical nodes in human diseases such as hypertension, depression, and others. Regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2), a member of the R4 family of RGS proteins, is overexpressed in many solid breast cancers, and its levels in prostate cancer significantly correlate with the metastatic stage and poor prognosis. We sought to develop RGS2 inhibitors as potential chemotherapeutic agents utilizing structure-based drug design approaches. Available structures of the RGS2-Gα complex were used to extract a pharmacophore model for searching chemical databases. Docking of identified hits to RGS2 as well as other RGS structures was used to screen the hits for potent and selective RGS2 inhibitors. Whole cell assays showed the top 10 ranking compounds, AJ-1-AJ-10, to inhibit RGS2-Gαq interactions. Differential scanning fluorimetry showed AJ-3 to bind RGS2 but not Gαq. All 10 compounds inhibited the growth of several RGS2 expressing cancers in cell culture assays. In addition, AJ-3 inhibited the migration of LNCaP prostate cancer cells in wound healing assays. This is the first group of RGS2 inhibitors identified by structure-based approaches and that show anticancer activity. These results highlight the potential RGS2 inhibitors have to be a new class of chemotherapeutic agents.

Regulator of G-protein signaling expression in human intestinal enteroendocrine cells and potential role in satiety hormone secretion in health and obesity

Gut L-type enteroendocrine cells (EECs) are intestinal chemosensory cells that secrete satiety hormones GLP-1 and PYY in response to activation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) by luminal components of nutrient digestion and microbial fermentation. Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins are negative regulators of GPCR signaling. The expression profile of RGS in EECs, and their potential role in satiety hormone secretion and obesity is unknown. Transcriptomic profiling of RGS was completed in native colonic EECs was completed using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) in lean and obesity, and human jejunal EECs with data obtained from a publicly available RNAseq dataset (GSE114853). RGS validation studies were completed using whole mucosal intestinal tissue obtained during endoscopy in 61 patients (n=42 OB, n=19 Lean); a subset of patients' postprandial plasma was assayed for GLP-1 and PYY. Exvivo human intestinal cultures and invitro NCI-H716cells overexpressing RGS9 were exposed to GLP-1 secretagogues in conjunction with a nonselective RGS-inhibitor and assayed for GLP-1 secretion. Transcriptomic profiling of colonic and jejunal enteroendocrine cells revealed a unique RGS expression profile in EECs, and further within GLP-1+ L-type EECs. In obesity the RGS expression profile was altered in colonic EECs. Human gut RGS9 expression correlated positively with BMI and negatively with postprandial GLP-1 and PYY. RGS inhibition in human intestinal cultures increased GLP-1 release from EECs exvivo. NCI-H716cells overexpressing RGS9 displayed defective nutrient-stimulated GLP-1 secretion. This study introduces the expression profile of RGS in human EECs, alterations in obesity, and suggests a role for RGS proteins as modulators of GLP-1 and PYY secretion from intestinal EECs. AA is supported by the NIH(C-Sig P30DK84567, K23 DK114460), a Pilot Award from the Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery, and a Translational Product Development Fund from The Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science Office of Translational Practice in partnership with the University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

Redox-modulated SNX25 as a novel regulator of GPCR-G protein signaling from endosomes

GPCR-G protein signaling from endosomes plays a crucial role in various physiological and pathological processes. However, the mechanism by which endosomal G protein signaling is terminated remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the regulatory mechanisms involved in terminating the signaling of Gα subunits from endosomes. Through structural analysis and cell-based assays, we have discovered that SNX25, a protein that targets endosomes via its PXA or PXC domain, interacts with regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins (including RGS2, RGS4, RGS8, and RGS17) in a redox-regulated manner. The interaction between SNX25 and these RGS proteins enhances their GTPase-accelerating activity towards Gαi/q and their ability to bind GDP-bound (inactive form) Gαi/q. As a result, SNX25 recruits these RGS proteins to endosomes, leading to the termination of endosomal Gαi/q signaling. Furthermore, we have found that the SNX25/RGS complex also exerts a negative regulatory effect on Gαi/q signaling from the plasma membrane. This is achieved by recruiting Gαi/q to endosomes and preventing its activation on the plasma membrane. Our findings shed light on the previously unknown role of redox-modulated SNX25 in inhibiting Gαi/q signaling, thereby uncovering a novel mechanism for terminating Gαi/q signaling from endosomes. Importantly, this study expands our understanding of the regulation of GPCR-Gαi/q signaling beyond the plasma membrane.

Left Ventricular Dilation Resulting from the Absence of Either Rgs2 or Rgs5 Is Associated with Increased Immune Cell Infiltration in the Myocardium

Sustained sympathoexcitation is a hallmark of heart failure, with equally sustained activation of downstream signaling pathways involving Gs- and Gi/o-coupled β-adrenergic receptors (βAR) stimulating cAMP production and PKA activation. A critical mechanism controlling G protein-mediated βAR signaling is the activity of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, including members of the B/R4 subfamily, which accelerate the termination of Gq/11 and Gi/o protein signaling. Previous studies by us and others reported that moderation of Gi/o activity separately by RGS2 and RGS5 of the R4 subfamily is key to maintaining normal ventricular rhythm. The loss of one or both R4 RGS proteins also results in left ventricular (LV) dilation and reduced ejection fraction. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the LV structural remodeling is due to the disruption of the coordinated activity of RGS2 and 5 resulting in sensitization of βAR signaling. To test this hypothesis, we challenged wild type (WT), Rgs2 KO ,Rgs5 KO, and Rgs2/5 double knockout (dbKO) adult male mice with sub-chronic infusion of isoproterenol (ISO, 30 mg/kg/day, 3 days) via a peritoneal osmotic minipump implantation. Rgs2 KO and Rgs5 KO mice showed increased LV chamber size at baseline, which was unchanged by ISO administration. In saline-treated animals, the loss of Rgs2 increased Rgs5 mRNA expression, while Rgs5 absence increased Rgs4 mRNA expression. ISO infusion induced concentric cardiac hypertrophy in WT mice, as evidenced by increased heart weight/tibia length (HW/TL) ratio and cardiomyocyte cross sectional area. While ISO infusion increased interstitial fibrosis in midventricular tissue and HW/TL ratio in dbKO mice, it did not affect cardiomyocyte cross sectional area or exacerbate LV dilation, despite increased expression of the cardiac fetal gene Nppa as well as the sarcomeric protein α-actinin and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). Cardiact tissue from saline-treated Rgs2 KO and Rgs5 KO mice had markedly increased CD45+ cells vs WT, while tissue from Rgs5 KO mice showed increased CD68+ cells, as revealed by immunohistochemistry. Taken together, these results indicate that ventricular remodeling seen in Rgs2 KO, Rgs5 KO, and Rgs2/5 dbKO mice is insensitive to sustained βAR stimulation but may be due to increased cardiac resident immune cell population. This work was supported by NIH R56 DK132859-01A1 and R01 HL139754, and Craig H. Neilsen Foundation Grant 382566 to Patrick Osei-Owusu. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Structure-function analysis of plant G-protein regulatory mechanisms identifies key Gα-RGS protein interactions

Heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein alpha subunit (Gα) and its cognate regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) protein transduce signals in eukaryotes spanning protists, amoeba, animals, fungi, and plants. The core catalytic mechanisms of the GTPase activity of Gα and the interaction interface with RGS for the acceleration of GTP hydrolysis seem to be conserved across these groups; however, the RGS gene is under low selective pressure in plants, resulting in its frequent loss. Our current understanding of the structural basis of Gα:RGS regulation in plants has been shaped by Arabidopsis Gα, (AtGPA1), which has a cognate RGS protein. To gain a comprehensive understanding of this regulation beyond Arabidopsis, we obtained the x-ray crystal structures of Oryza sativa Gα, which has no RGS, and Selaginella moellendorffi (a lycophyte) Gα that has low sequence similarity with AtGPA1 but has an RGS. We show that the three-dimensional structure, protein-protein interaction with RGS, and the dynamic features of these Gα are similar to AtGPA1 and metazoan Gα. Molecular dynamic simulation of the Gα-RGS interaction identifies the contacts established by specific residues of the switch regions of GTP-bound Gα, crucial for this interaction, but finds no significant difference due to specific amino acid substitutions. Together, our data provide valuable insights into the regulatory mechanisms of plant G-proteins but do not support the hypothesis of adaptive co-evolution of Gα:RGS proteins in plants.

A regulatory node involving Gαq, PLCβ, and RGS proteins modulates platelet reactivity to critical agonists

BackgroundMost platelet agonists work through G protein-coupled receptors, activating pathways that involve members of the Gq, Gi, and G12/G13 families of heterotrimeric G proteins. Gq signaling has been shown to be critical for efficient platelet activation. Growing evidence suggests that regulatory mechanisms converge on G protein-coupled receptors and Gq to prevent overly robust platelet reactivity. ObjectivesTo identify and characterize mechanisms by which Gq signaling is regulated in platelets. MethodsBased on our prior experience with a Gαi2 variant that escapes regulation by regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, a Gαq variant was designed with glycine 188 replaced with serine (G188S) and then incorporated into a mouse line so that its effects on platelet activation and thrombus formation could be studied in vitro and in vivo. Results and ConclusionsAs predicted, the G188S substitution in Gαq disrupted its interaction with RGS18. Unexpectedly, it also uncoupled PLCβ-3 from activation by platelet agonists as evidenced by a loss rather than a gain of platelet function in vitro and in vivo. Binding studies showed that in addition to preventing the binding of RGS18 to Gαq, the G188S substitution also prevented the binding of PLCβ-3 to Gαq. Structural analysis revealed that G188 resides in the region that is also important for Gαq binding to PLCβ-3 in platelets. We conclude that the Gαq signaling node is more complex than that has been previously understood, suggesting that there is cross-talk between RGS proteins and PLCβ-3 in the context of Gαq signaling.

The roles of RGS proteins in cardiometabolic disease.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most prominent receptors on the surface of the cell and play a central role in the regulation of cardiac and metabolic functions. GPCRs transmit extracellular stimuli to the interior of the cells by activating one or more heterotrimeric G proteins. The duration and intensity of G protein-mediated signalling are tightly controlled by a large array of intracellular mediators, including the regulator of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins. RGS proteins selectively promote the GTPase activity of a subset of Gα subunits, thus serving as negative regulators in a pathway-dependent manner. In the current review, we summarise the involvement of RGS proteins in cardiometabolic function with a focus on their tissue distribution, mechanisms of action and dysregulation under various disease conditions. We also discuss the potential therapeutic applications for targeting RGS proteins in treating cardiometabolic conditions and current progress in developing RGS modulators. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: hot topics from the Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists 2021 Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.14/issuetoc.

Mechanisms of mGluR-dependent plasticity in hippocampal area CA2.

Pyramidal cells in hippocampal area CA2 have synaptic properties that are distinct from the other CA subregions. Notably, this includes a lack of typical long-term potentiation of stratum radiatum synapses. CA2 neurons express high levels of several known and potential regulators of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)-dependent signaling including Striatal-Enriched Tyrosine Phosphatase (STEP) and several Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins, yet the functions of these proteins in regulating mGluR-dependent synaptic plasticity in CA2 are completely unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine mGluR-dependent synaptic depression and to determine whether STEP and the RGS proteins RGS4 and RGS14 are involved. Using whole cell voltage-clamp recordings from mouse pyramidal cells, we found that mGluR agonist-induced long-term depression (mGluR-LTD) is more pronounced in CA2 compared with that observed in CA1. This mGluR-LTD in CA2 was found to be protein synthesis and STEP dependent, suggesting that CA2 mGluR-LTD shares mechanistic processes with those seen in CA1, but in addition, RGS14, but not RGS4, was essential for mGluR-LTD in CA2. In addition, we found that exogenous application of STEP could rescue mGluR-LTD in RGS14 KO slices. Supporting a role for CA2 synaptic plasticity in social cognition, we found that RGS14 KO mice had impaired social recognition memory as assessed in a social discrimination task. These results highlight possible roles for mGluRs, RGS14, and STEP in CA2-dependent behaviors, perhaps by biasing the dominant form of synaptic plasticity away from LTP and toward LTD in CA2.

Cardiac RGS Proteins in Human Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on RGS4.

The regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are crucial for the termination of G protein signals elicited by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This superfamily of cell membrane receptors, by far the largest and most versatile in mammals, including humans, play pivotal roles in the regulation of cardiac function and homeostasis. Perturbations in both the activation and termination of their G protein-mediated signaling underlie numerous heart pathologies, including heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AFib). Therefore, RGS proteins play important roles in the pathophysiology of these two devasting cardiac diseases, and several of them could be targeted therapeutically. Although close to 40 human RGS proteins have been identified, each RGS protein seems to interact only with a specific set of G protein subunits and GPCR types/subtypes in any given tissue or cell type. Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies in animal models, and also in diseased human heart tissue obtained from transplantations or tissue banks, have provided substantial evidence of the roles various cardiomyocyte RGS proteins play in cardiac normal homeostasis as well as pathophysiology. One RGS protein in particular, RGS4, has been reported in what are now decades-old studies to be selectively upregulated in human HF. It has also been implicated in protection against AFib via knockout mice studies. This review summarizes the current understanding of the functional roles of cardiac RGS proteins and their implications for the treatment of HF and AFib, with a specific focus on RGS4 for the aforementioned reasons but also because it can be targeted successfully with small organic molecule inhibitors.

The therapeutic potential of targeting cardiac RGS4.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play pivotal roles in regulation of cardiac function and homeostasis. To function properly, every cell needs these receptors to be stimulated only when a specific extracellular stimulus is present, and to be silenced the moment that stimulus is removed. The regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are crucial for the latter to occur at the cell membrane, where the GPCR normally resides. Perturbations in both activation and termination of G protein signaling underlie numerous heart pathologies. Although more than 30 mammalian RGS proteins have been identified, each RGS protein seems to interact only with a specific set of G protein subunits and GPCR types/subtypes in any given tissue or cell type, and this applies to the myocardium as well. A large number of studies have provided substantial evidence for the roles various RGS proteins expressed in cardiomyocytes play in cardiac physiology and heart disease pathophysiology. This review summarizes the current understanding of the functional roles of cardiac RGS proteins and their implications for the treatment of specific heart diseases, such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation. We focus on cardiac RGS4 in particular, since this isoform appears to be selectively (among the RGS protein family) upregulated in human heart failure and is also the target of ongoing drug discovery efforts for the treatment of a variety of diseases.

Functional Assessment of Cancer-Linked Mutations in Sensitive Regions of Regulators of G Protein Signaling Predicted by Three-Dimensional Missense Tolerance Ratio Analysis.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling by acting as negative regulators of G proteins. Genetic variants in RGS proteins are associated with many diseases, including cancers, although the impact of these mutations on protein function is uncertain. Here we analyze the RGS domains of 15 RGS protein family members using a novel bioinformatic tool that measures the missense tolerance ratio (MTR) using a three-dimensional (3D) structure (3DMTR). Subsequent permutation analysis can define the protein regions that are most significantly intolerant (P < 0.05) in each dataset. We further focused on RGS14, RGS10, and RGS4. RGS14 exhibited seven significantly tolerant and seven significantly intolerant residues, RGS10 had six intolerant residues, and RGS4 had eight tolerant and six intolerant residues. Intolerant and tolerant-control residues that overlap with pathogenic cancer mutations reported in the COSMIC cancer database were selected to define the functional phenotype. Using complimentary cellular and biochemical approaches, proteins were tested for effects on GPCR-Gα activation, Gα binding properties, and downstream cAMP levels. Identified intolerant residues with reported cancer-linked mutations RGS14-R173C/H and RGS4-K125Q/E126K, and tolerant RGS14-S127P and RGS10-S64T resulted in a loss-of-function phenotype in GPCR-G protein signaling activity. In downstream cAMP measurement, tolerant RGS14-D137Y and RGS10-S64T and intolerant RGS10-K89M resulted in change of function phenotypes. These findings show that 3DMTR identified intolerant residues that overlap with cancer-linked mutations cause phenotypic changes that negatively impact GPCR-G protein signaling and suggests that 3DMTR is a potentially useful bioinformatics tool for predicting functionally important protein residues. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Human genetic variant/mutation information has expanded rapidly in recent years, including cancer-linked mutations in regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. However, experimental testing of the impact of this vast catalogue of mutations on protein function is not feasible. We used the novel bioinformatics tool three-dimensional missense tolerance ratio (3DMTR) to define regions of genetic intolerance in RGS proteins and prioritize which cancer-linked mutants to test. We found that 3DMTR more accurately classifies loss-of-function mutations in RGS proteins than other databases thereby offering a valuable new research tool.

Functions of regulators of G protein signaling 16 in immunity, inflammation, and other diseases.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) act as guanosine triphosphatase activating proteins to accelerate guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis of the G protein α subunit, leading to the termination of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) downstream signaling pathway. RGS16, which is expressed in a number of cells and tissues, belongs to one of the small B/R4 subfamilies of RGS proteins and consists of a conserved RGS structural domain with short, disordered amino- and carboxy-terminal extensions and an α-helix that classically binds and de-activates heterotrimeric G proteins. However, with the deepening of research, it has been revealed that RGS16 protein not only regulates the classical GPCR pathway, but also affects immune, inflammatory, tumor and metabolic processes through other signaling pathways including the mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, Ras homolog family member A and stromal cell-derived factor 1/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 pathways. Additionally, the RGS16 protein may be involved in the Hepatitis B Virus -induced inflammatory response. Therefore, given the continuous expansion of knowledge regarding its role and mechanism, the structure, characteristics, regulatory mechanisms and known functions of the small RGS proteinRGS16 are reviewed in this paper to prepare for diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation of different diseases such as inflammation, tumor, and metabolic disorders and to better study its function in other diseases.

Phylogeny of Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Genes in Leptographium qinlingensis and Expression Levels of Three RGSs in Response to Different Terpenoids.

Leptographium qinlingensis is a bark beetle-vectored pine pathogen in the Chinese white pine beetle (Dendroctonus armandi) epidemic in Northwest China. L. qinlingensis colonizes pines despite the trees’ massive oleoresin terpenoid defenses. Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate heterotrimeric G-protein signaling negatively and play multiple roles in the growth, asexual development, and pathogenicity of fungi. In this study, we have identified three L. qinlingensis RGS genes, and the phylogenetic analysis shows the highest homology with the regulators of G-protein signaling proteins sequence from Ophiostoma piceae and Grosmannia clavigera. The expression profiles of three RGSs in the mycelium of L. qinlingensis treated with six different terpenoids were detected, as well as their growth rates. Under six terpenoid treatments, the growth and reproduction in L. qinlingensis were significantly inhibited, and the growth inflection day was delayed from 8 days to 12–13 days. By analyzing the expression level of three RGS genes of L. qinlingensis with different treatments, results indicate that LqFlbA plays a crucial role in controlling fungal growth, and both LqRax1 and LqRgsA are involved in overcoming the host chemical resistances and successful colonization.

Regulator of G Protein Signaling 20 Correlates with Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNA (lincRNAs) Harboring Oncogenic Potential and Is Markedly Upregulated in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Simple SummaryClinical and molecular advances have improved knowledge and treatment prospects for cancer, yet hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common form of liver cancer, still ranks significantly higher in terms of the global cancer burden. Herein, we investigated the role of RGS20 as a potential prognostic marker in 28 different cancers with a particular focus on HCC.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is at the forefront of the global cancer burden, and biomarkers for HCC are constantly being sought. Interestingly, RGS (Regulators of G protein signaling) proteins, which negatively regulate GPCR signaling, have been associated with various cancers, with some members of the RGS family being associated with liver cancer as well. Considering this, we investigated the role of RGS20 as a potential prognostic marker in 28 different cancer types with special emphasis on HCC. By using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data, our analysis revealed that (a) RGS20 was strongly upregulated in tumor tissue compared with adjacent normal tissue of HCC patients; (b) RGS20 was strongly associated with some important clinical parameters such as alpha-fetoprotein and tumor grade in the HCC patients; (c) besides HCC (p < 0.001), RGS20 was found to be an important factor for survival in four other cancers (clear renal cell carcinoma: p < 0.001, lung adenocarcinoma: p = 0.004, mesothelioma: p = 0.039, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma: p = 0.048); (d) RGS20 was found to be significantly associated with some tumor-related signaling pathways and long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs: LINC00511, PVT1, MIR4435-2HG, BCYRN1, and MAPKAPK5-AS1) that exhibit oncogenic potential. Taken together, we showed that RGS20 correlates with a few HCC-associated lincRNAs harboring oncogenic potential and is markedly upregulated in HCC patients. Our analysis further supports the putative function of RGS proteins, particularly RGS20, in cancer.

Interacting partners of Brassica juncea regulator of G-protein signaling protein suggest its role in cell wall metabolism and cellular signaling.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins interact with various upstream and downstream effectors to regulate various aspects of plant growth and development. G-protein effectors have been recently reported in Arabidopsis thaliana; however, less information is available from polyploid crop species having complex networks of G-protein components. Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) is a well-characterized GTPase accelerating protein, which plays an important role in the regulation of the G-protein cycle in plants. In the present study, four homologs encoding RGS proteins were isolated from the allotetraploid Brassica juncea, a globally important oilseed, vegetable, and condiment crop. The B. juncea RGS proteins were grouped into distinct BjuRGS1 and BjuRGS2 orthologous clades, and the expression of BjuRGS1 homologs was predominantly higher than BjuRGS2 homologs across the tested tissue types of B. juncea. Utilizing B. juncea Y2H library screening, a total of 30 nonredundant interacting proteins with the RGS-domain of the highly expressed BjuA.RGS1 was identified. Gene ontology analysis indicated that these effectors exerted various molecular, cellular, and physiological functions. Many of them were known to regulate cell wall metabolism (BjuEXP6, Bju-α-MAN, BjuPGU4, BjuRMS3) and phosphorylation-mediated cell signaling (BjuMEK4, BjuDGK3, and BjuKinase). Furthermore, transcript analysis indicated that the identified interacting proteins have a coexpression pattern with the BjuRGS homologs. These findings increase our knowledge about the novel targets of G-protein components from a globally cultivated Brassica crop and provide an important resource for developing a plant G-protein interactome network.

Self-activating G protein α subunits engage seven-transmembrane regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins and a Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor effector in the amoeba Naegleria fowleri

The free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri is a causative agent of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis and is highly resistant to current therapies, resulting in mortality rates >97%. As many therapeutics target G protein–centered signal transduction pathways, further understanding the functional significance of G protein signaling within N. fowleri should aid future drug discovery against this pathogen. Here, we report that the N. fowleri genome encodes numerous transcribed G protein signaling components, including G protein–coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G protein subunits, regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, and candidate Gα effector proteins. We found N. fowleri Gα subunits have diverse nucleotide cycling kinetics; Nf Gα5 and Gα7 exhibit more rapid nucleotide exchange than GTP hydrolysis (i.e., “self-activating” behavior). A crystal structure of Nf Gα7 highlights the stability of its nucleotide-free state, consistent with its rapid nucleotide exchange. Variations in the phosphate binding loop also contribute to nucleotide cycling differences among Gα subunits. Similar to plant G protein signaling pathways, N. fowleri Gα subunits selectively engage members of a large seven-transmembrane RGS protein family, resulting in acceleration of GTP hydrolysis. We show Nf Gα2 and Gα3 directly interact with a candidate Gα effector protein, RGS-RhoGEF, similar to mammalian Gα12/13 signaling pathways. We demonstrate Nf Gα2 and Gα3 each engage RGS-RhoGEF through a canonical Gα/RGS domain interface, suggesting a shared evolutionary origin with G protein signaling in the enteric pathogen Entamoeba histolytica. These findings further illuminate the evolution of G protein signaling and identify potential targets of pharmacological manipulation in N. fowleri.