Regulators Of G Protein Signaling Proteins Research Articles

Effect of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins on Bone.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are critical negative molecules of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, which mediates a variety of biological processes in bone homeostasis and diseases. The RGS proteins are divided into nine subfamilies with a conserved RGS domain which plays an important role in regulating the GTPase activity. Mutations of some RGS proteins change bone development and/or metabolism, causing osteopathy. In this review, we summarize the recent findings of RGS proteins in regulating osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and osteoclasts. We also highlight the impacts of RGS on bone development, bone remodeling, and bone-related diseases. Those studies demonstrate that RGS proteins might be potential drug targets for bone diseases.

Differential methamphetamine-induced behavioral effects in male and female mice lacking regulator of G Protein signaling 4

Methamphetamine-induced behavioral effects are mediated by several neurotransmitters that act via the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The functioning of GPCRs are negatively regulated by regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins. The goal of this study was to assess the role of two specific RGS proteins namely the RGS2 and the RGS4 proteins in methamphetamine-induced behaviors. The effects of methamphetamine (1 mg/kg; i.p.) on conditioned place preference (CPP) and locomotor activity were assessed in genetically modified male and female mice lacking either RGS2 or RGS4 and their wildtype littermates to achieve the above goal. Locomotor activity after methamphetamine administration was assessed in both methamphetamine-naïve and -experienced mice. Methamphetamine-induced CPP at the tested dose was blocked in male, but not female, mice lacking RGS4 compared to respective controls. Interestingly, methamphetamine-induced increase in locomotor activity at the tested dose was observed in methamphetamine-experienced, but not in the methamphetamine-naïve, male mice lacking RGS4. However, methamphetamine-induced increase in locomotor activity at the tested dose was blocked in both methamphetamine-naïve and -experienced female mice lacking RGS4. Interestingly, methamphetamine-induced rewarding effects and methamphetamine-induced increase in locomotor activity at the tested dose were observed in mice lacking RGS2, irrespective of sex and/or history of methamphetamine exposure. Together, the data suggest that RGS4 plays a role in methamphetamine-induced behaviors and could serve as a potential target for medications intended to treat the acute effects of methamphetamine.

Cardiovascular GPCR regulation by regulator of G protein signaling proteins.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play pivotal roles in regulation of cardiovascular homeostasis across all vertebrate species, including humans. In terms of normal cellular function, termination of GPCR signaling via the heterotrimeric G proteins is equally (if not more) important to its stimulation. The Regulator of G protein Signaling (RGS) protein superfamily are indispensable for GPCR signaling cessation at the cell membrane, and thus, for cellular control of GPCR signaling and function. Perturbations in both activation and termination of G protein signaling underlie many examples of cardiovascular dysfunction and heart disease pathogenesis. Despite the plethora of over 30 members comprising the mammalian RGS protein superfamily, each member interacts with a specific set of second messenger pathways and GPCR types/subtypes in a tissue/cell type-specific manner. An increasing number of studies over the past two decades have provided compelling evidence for the involvement of various RGS proteins in physiological regulation of cardiovascular GPCRs and, consequently, also in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular ailments. This chapter summarizes the current understanding of the functional roles of RGS proteins as they pertain to cardiovascular, i.e., heart, blood vessel, and platelet GPCR function, with a particular focus on their implications for chronic heart failure pathophysiology and therapy.

R4 RGS proteins suppress engraftment of human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells by modulating SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling

AbstractHoming and engraftment of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) into the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment are tightly regulated by the chemokine stromal cell–derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and its G-protein–coupled receptor C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which on engagement with G-protein subunits, trigger downstream migratory signals. Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) are GTPase-accelerating protein of the Gα subunit and R4 subfamily members have been implicated in SDF-1–directed trafficking of mature hematopoietic cells, yet their expression and influence on HSPCs remain mostly unknown. Here, we demonstrated that human CD34+ cells expressed multiple R4 RGS genes, of which RGS1, RGS2, RGS13, and RGS16 were significantly upregulated by SDF-1 in a CXCR4-dependent fashion. Forced overexpression of RGS1, RGS13, or RGS16 in CD34+ cells not only inhibited SDF-1–directed migration, calcium mobilization, and phosphorylation of AKT, ERK, and STAT3 in vitro, but also markedly reduced BM engraftment in transplanted NOD/SCID mice. Genome-wide microarray analysis of RGS-overexpressing CD34+ cells detected downregulation of multiple effectors with established roles in stem cell trafficking/maintenance. Convincingly, gain-of-function of selected effectors or ex vivo priming with their ligands significantly enhanced HSPC engraftment. We also constructed an evidence-based network illustrating the overlapping mechanisms of RGS1, RGS13, and RGS16 downstream of SDF-1/CXCR4 and Gαi. This model shows that these RGS members mediate compromised kinase signaling and negative regulation of stem cell functions, complement activation, proteolysis, and cell migration. Collectively, this study uncovers an essential inhibitory role of specific R4 RGS proteins in stem cell engraftment, which could potentially be exploited to develop improved clinical HSPC transplantation protocols.

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins in GtoPdb v.2021.2

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [225, 529, 578, 583, 584, 742, 753, 444, 10].

Engraftment and SDF-1/CXCR4 Signaling in Human CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells Are Regulated By R4 Rgs Subfamily Proteins

Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) family proteins are known to negatively regulate G-protein-coupled receptor signaling through their GTPase-accelerating activity. In several types of mature hematopoietic cells (e.g., B lymphocytes and megakaryocytes), responses to chemokines are subjected to regulation by R4 subfamily RGS proteins. However, their expression patterns and functional roles in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSC) are poorly characterized. Here, we showed that human CD34+ HSC derived from cord blood (CB, n = 12) expressed RGS1 , RGS2 , RGS3 , RGS5 , RGS13 , RGS16 and RGS18 at mRNA level, whereas RGS4 , RGS8 and RGS21 were undetectable. Exposure of CB CD34+ cells to the critical homing-related chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) significantly increased RGS1 , RGS2 , RGS13 and RGS16 , and decreased RGS3 and RGS18 expressions (P ≤ 0.040, n = 5). Expressions of RGS1 , RGS13 and RGS16 were significantly higher in bone marrow (BM, n = 14) CD34+ cells when compared to mobilized peripheral blood (MPB, n = 14) CD34+ cells (P ≤ 0.002), while RGS3 and RGS18 expressions were lower in BM CD34+ cells (P ≤ 0.036), suggesting a SDF-1 and niche-dependent regulation of RGS expressions. Lentivirus-mediated overexpression of RGS1 , RGS13 or RGS16 significantly inhibited migration of CD34+ cells to a SDF-1 gradient (P ≤ 0.039, n = 4-5) butdid not alter SDF-1-induced actin polymerization (n = 3). In addition, phosphorylation of signaling molecules downstream of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis, including Akt, ERK and STAT3 was significantly suppressed in RGS1 - and RGS16 -overexpressing CD34+ cells. In the NOD/SCID mouse xenotransplantation model, overexpression of RGS1 , RGS13 or RGS16 significantly reduced BM engraftment of CD34+ cells by 98% (P = 0.023, n = 7), 89% (P = 0.014, n = 8) and 87% (P = 0.015, n = 8) respectively. Transcriptome profiling (n = 4) of CD34+ cells identified 312 genes with differential expressions upon overexpression of RGS1 , RGS13 or RGS16 , with 32 genes commonly regulated. Gene function enrichment analysis revealed significant downregulation of genes involved in the migration (PROS1 , CCL1 , THBS1 , F2RL2 ), complement activation (C3AR1 , C5AR1 , C5AR2 ), and proteolysis (MMP14 , TIMP3 ) pathways, which were validated by qPCR (n = 8). Taken together, we provided the first evidence that R4 RGS members are expressed and regulated by the SDF-1 in human CD34+ HSC. We also presented data showing that RGS1 , RGS13 or RGS16 negatively regulated in vitro SDF-1-mediated migration and signaling as well as in vivo engraftment of CD34+ cells, suggesting that these RGS members might serve as a feedback mechanism to regulate the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Strategies to inhibit specific R4 RGS proteins could potentially enhance efficiency of HSC homing and engraftment, which are particularly important in the setting of CB transplantation. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Mice Expressing Regulators of G protein Signaling-insensitive Gαo Define Roles of μ Opioid Receptor Gαo and Gαi Subunit Coupling in Inhibition of Presynaptic GABA Release.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate signaling by G protein-coupled receptors. Using a knock-in transgenic mouse model with a mutation in Gαo that does not bind RGS proteins (RGS-insensitive), we determined the effect of RGS proteins on presynaptic μ opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated inhibition of GABA release in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG). The MOR agonists [d-Ala2, N-MePhe4, Gly-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) and met-enkephalin (ME) inhibited evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eIPSCs) in the RGS-insensitive mice compared with wild-type (WT) littermates, respectively. Fentanyl inhibited eIPSCs similarly in both WT and RGS-insensitive mice. There were no differences in opioid agonist inhibition of spontaneous GABA release between the genotypes. To further probe the mechanism underlying these differences between opioid inhibition of evoked and spontaneous GABA release, specific myristoylated Gα peptide inhibitors for Gαo1 and Gαi1-3 that block receptor-G protein interactions were used to test the preference of agonists for MOR-Gα complexes. The Gαo1 inhibitor reduced DAMGO inhibition of eIPSCs, but Gαi1-3 inhibitors had no effect. Both Gαo1 and Gαi1-3 inhibitors separately reduced fentanyl inhibition of eIPSCs but had no effects on ME inhibition. Gαi1-3 inhibitors blocked the inhibitory effects of ME and fentanyl on miniature postsynaptic current (mIPSC) frequency, but both Gαo1 and Gαi1-3 inhibitors were needed to block the effects of DAMGO. Finally, baclofen-mediated inhibition of GABA release is unaffected in the RGS-insensitive mice and in the presence of Gαo1 and Gαi1-3 inhibitor peptides, suggesting that GABAB receptor coupling to G proteins in vlPAG presynaptic terminals is different than MOR coupling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Presynaptic μ opioid receptors (MORs) in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray are critical for opioid analgesia and are negatively regulated by RGS proteins. These data in RGS-insensitive mice provide evidence that MOR agonists differ in preference for Gαo versus Gαi and regulation by RGS proteins in presynaptic terminals, providing a mechanism for functional selectivity between agonists. The results further define important differences in MOR and GABAB receptor coupling to G proteins that could be exploited for new pain therapies.

Identification of Potential Modulators of the RGS7/Gβ5/R7BP Complex.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins serve as critical regulatory nodes to limit the lifetime and extent of signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Previously, approaches to pharmacologically inhibit RGS activity have mostly focused on the inhibition of GTPase activity by interrupting the interaction of RGS proteins with the G proteins they regulate. However, several RGS proteins are also regulated by association with binding partners. A notable example is the mammalian RGS7 protein, which has prominent roles in metabolic control, vision, reward, and actions of opioid analgesics. In vivo, RGS7 exists in complex with the binding partners type 5 G protein β subunit (Gβ5) and R7 binding protein (R7BP), which control its stability and activity, respectively. Targeting the whole RGS7/Gβ5/R7BP protein complex affords the opportunity to allosterically tune opioid receptor signaling following opioid engagement while potentially bypassing undesirable side effects. Hence, we implemented a novel strategy to pharmacologically target the interaction between RGS7/Gβ5 and R7BP. To do so, we searched for protein complex inhibitors using a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based high-throughput screening (HTS) assay that measures compound-mediated alterations in the FRET signal between RGS7/Gβ5 and R7BP. We performed two HTS campaigns, each screening ~100,000 compounds from the Scripps Drug Discovery Library (SDDL). Each screen yielded more than 100 inhibitors, which will be described herein.

Fragment-Based Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Screen against a Regulator of G Protein Signaling Identifies a Binding "Hot Spot".

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins have attracted attention as a result of their primary role in directing the specificity as well as the temporal and spatial aspects of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. In addition, alterations in RGS protein expression have been observed in a number of disease states, including certain cancers. In this area, RGS17 is of particular interest. It has been demonstrated that, while RGS17 is expressed primarily in the central nervous system, it has been found to be inappropriately expressed in lung, prostate, breast, cervical, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Overexpression of RGS17 leads to dysfunction in inhibitory G protein signaling and an overproduction of the intracellular second messenger cAMP, which in turn alters the transcription patterns of proteins known to promote various cancer types. Suppressing RGS17 expression with RNA interference (RNAi) has been found to decrease tumorigenesis and sufficiently prevents cancer cell migration, leading to the hypothesis that pharmacological blocking of RGS17 function could be useful in anticancer therapies. We have identified small-molecule fragments capable of binding the RGS homology (RH) domain of RGS17 by using a nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based screening approach. By chemical shift mapping of the two-dimensional 15 N,1 H heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectra of the backbone-assigned 15 N-labeled RGS17-RH, we determined the fragment binding sites to be distant from the Gα interface. Thus, our study identifies a putative fragment binding site on RGS17 that was previously unknown.

Analgesic Efficacy of α2 Adrenergic Receptor Agonists Depends on the Chronic State of Neuropathic Pain: Role of Regulator of G Protein Signaling 4

The analgesic effect of alpha-2 adrenergic receptor (α2AR) agonists, which relieve chronic neuropathic pain, is highly variable among individuals. Here, we used a mouse model of spared nerve injury (SNI) to show that treatment time after the establishment of neuropathic pain was important for the variability in the analgesic efficacy of α2AR agonists, which was related to the activity of regulator of G-protein signaling protein 4 (RGS4). Intrathecal treatment with α2AR agonists, clonidine (0.1–1 nmol) or dexmedetomidine (0.3–1 nmol), relieved mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia on postoperative day (POD) 14, but their efficacy was weaker on POD28 and absent on POD56. The RGS4 level of plasma membrane was increased on POD56 compared to that on POD14. Moreover, in RGS4-deficient or RGS4 inhibitor (CCG50014)-treated mice, the analgesic effect of the α2AR agonists was conserved even on POD56. The increased plasma membrane RGS4 expression and the reduced level of active Gαi after clonidine injection on POD56 were completely restored by CCG50014. Higher doses of clonidine (10 nmol) and dexmedetomidine (3 nmol) relieved neuropathic pain on POD56 but were accompanied with serious side effects. Whereas, the coadministration of CCG50014 with clonidine (1 nmol) or dexmedetomidine (1 nmol) did not cause side effects. These findings demonstrated that SNI-induced increase in plasma membrane RGS4 expression was associated with low efficacy of α2AR agonists in a model of persistent, chronic neuropathic pain. Furthermore, α2AR agonist administration together with RGS4-targeted intervention represents a novel strategy for the treatment of neuropathic pain to overcome dose-limiting side effects.

Allosteric Pathways Originating at Cysteine Residues in Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Proteins

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins play a central role in modulating signaling via G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Specifically, RGS proteins bind to activated Gα subunits in G-proteins, accelerate the GTP hydrolysis, and thereby rapidly dampen GPCR signaling. Therefore, covalent molecules targeting conserved cysteine residues among RGS proteins have emerged as potential candidates to inhibit the RGS/Gα protein-protein interaction and enhance GPCR signaling. Although these inhibitors bind to conserved cysteine residues among RGS proteins, we have previously suggested [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:3454–3460] that their potencies and specificities are related to differential protein dynamics among RGS proteins. Using data from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal these differences in dynamics of RGS proteins by partitioning the protein structural space into a network of communities that allow allosteric signals to propagate along unique pathways originating at inhibitor binding sites and terminating at the RGS/Gα protein-protein interface.

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.5) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [183, 411, 446, 450, 451, 558, 566, 345, 9].

Hepatic Regulator of G Protein Signaling 5 Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Suppressing Transforming Growth Factor Beta-Activated Kinase 1-c-Jun-N-Terminal Kinase/p38 Signaling.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disease, which has no specific pharmacological treatments partially because of the unclear pathophysiological mechanisms. Regulator of G protein signaling (RGSs) proteins are proteins that negatively regulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. The members of the R4/B subfamily are the smallest RGS proteins in size, and RGS5 belongs to this family, which mediates pluripotent biological functions through canonical G protein-mediated pathways and non-GPCR pathways. This study combined a genetically engineered rodent model and a transcriptomics-sequencing approach to investigate the role and regulatory mechanism of RGS5 in the development of NAFLD. This study found that RGS5 protects against NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Using RNA sequencing and an unbiased systematic investigative approach, this study found that the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades in response to metabolic challenge is negatively associated with hepatic RGS5 expression. Mechanistically, we found that the 64-181 amino-acid-sequence (aa) fragment of RGS5 directly interacts with transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) through the 1-300aa fragment and inhibits TAK1 phosphorylation and the subsequent c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK)/p38 pathway activation. In hepatocytes, RGS5 is an essential molecule that protects against the progression of NAFLD. RGS5 directly binds to TAK1, preventing its hyperphosphorylation and the activation of the downstream JNK/p38 signaling cascade. RGS5 is a promising target molecule for fine-tuning the activity of TAK1 and for the treatment of NAFLD.

Generation of a RGS18 gene knockout cell line from a human embryonic stem cell line by CRISPR/Cas9.

RGS18 is a member of the RGS (Regulators of G-protein signaling) protein family, involved in megakaryopoiesis, megakaryocyte differentiation and chemotaxis. Here, we created a RGS18 knockout cell line from a human embryonic stem cell line by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene targeting, to further understand roles of RGS18 in these processes. The cell line maintains stem cell morphology and normal karyotype, and retains expression of pluripotent marker genes and differentiation potential in vivo. The RGS18-/- cell line will facilitate investigation of the role of RGS18 during multiple cellular processes in human pluripotent stem cell modeled hematopoiesis.

Modulation of G-protein-coupled receptor 55-mediated signaling by regulator of G-protein signaling 2

Activation of seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) mediates extracellular signals into intracellular responses. G-protein coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) is one of GPCRs and activated by endogenous cannabinoids. A family of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) stimulates GTP hydrolysis of alpha subunit of G-protein (Gα) and inhibits GPCR/Gα-mediated signaling. RGS2 is member of R4 RGS family and mainly attenuates GPCR/Gαq signaling. Although RGS2 is known to modulate some GPCR signaling, the specific effects of RGS2 on GPR55-mediated signaling are not fully understood at present. Previously, we reported some RGS proteins interact with protease-activated receptors, one of GPCRs, and modulate their functions. Here, we investigated whether GPR55 interacts with RGS2, employing bioluminescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation analyses. Interestingly, GPR55 interacted with RGS2 alone and also formed a ternary complex with RGS2 and either Gαq or Gα12. In the presence of GPR55 alone and together with Gαq or Gα12, RGS2 translocated from the cytoplasm to plasma membrane while RGS1 remained in the cytoplasm. GPR55 activation significantly induced ERK phosphorylation and intracellular calcium mobilization, which were markedly inhibited by RGS2 in HCT116 colon cancer cell line. Furthermore, GPR55-mediated cell proliferation and migration of HCT116 cells, was significantly attenuated by RGS2. Our collective findings highlight a novel physiological function of RGS2, supporting its utility as a therapeutic target to control GPR55-induced pathophysiology.

RGS10 and RGS18 differentially limit platelet activation, promote platelet production, and prolong platelet survival

AbstractG protein–coupled receptors are critical mediators of platelet activation whose signaling can be modulated by members of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family. The 2 most abundant RGS proteins in human and mouse platelets are RGS10 and RGS18. While each has been studied individually, critical questions remain about the overall impact of this mode of regulation in platelets. Here, we report that mice missing both proteins show reduced platelet survival and a 40% decrease in platelet count that can be partially reversed with aspirin and a P2Y12 antagonist. Their platelets have increased basal (TREM)-like transcript-1 expression, a leftward shift in the dose/response for a thrombin receptor–activating peptide, an increased maximum response to adenosine 5′-diphosphate and TxA2, and a greatly exaggerated response to penetrating injuries in vivo. Neither of the individual knockouts displays this constellation of findings. RGS10−/− platelets have an enhanced response to agonists in vitro, but platelet count and survival are normal. RGS18−/− mice have a 15% reduction in platelet count that is not affected by antiplatelet agents, nearly normal responses to platelet agonists, and normal platelet survival. Megakaryocyte number and ploidy are normal in all 3 mouse lines, but platelet recovery from severe acute thrombocytopenia is slower in RGS18−/− and RGS10−/−18−/− mice. Collectively, these results show that RGS10 and RGS18 have complementary roles in platelets. Removing both at the same time discloses the extent to which this regulatory mechanism normally controls platelet reactivity in vivo, modulates the hemostatic response to injury, promotes platelet production, and prolongs platelet survival.

N-Terminal Targeting of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Protein 2 for F-Box Only Protein 44-Mediated Proteasomal Degradation.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are negative modulators of G protein signaling that have emerged as promising drug targets to improve specificity and reduce side effects of G protein-coupled receptor-related therapies. Several small molecule RGS protein inhibitors have been identified; however, enhancing RGS protein function is often more clinically desirable but presents a challenge. Low protein levels of RGS2 are associated with various pathologies, including hypertension and heart failure. For this reason, RGS2 is a prominent example wherein enhancing its function would be beneficial. RGS2 is rapidly ubiquitinated and proteasomally degraded, providing a point of intervention for small molecule RGS2-stabilizing compounds. We previously identified a novel cullin-RING E3 ligase utilizing F-box only protein 44 (FBXO44) as the substrate recognition component. Here, we demonstrate that RGS2 associates with FBXO44 through a stretch of residues in its N terminus. RGS2 contains four methionine residues close to the N terminus that can act as alternative translation initiation sites. The shorter translation initiation variants display reduced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation as a result of lost association with FBXO44. In addition, we show that phosphorylation of Ser3 may be an additional mechanism to protect RGS2 from FBXO44-mediated proteasomal degradation. These findings contribute to elucidating mechanisms regulating steady state levels of RGS2 protein and will inform future studies to develop small molecule RGS2 stabilizers. These would serve as novel leads in pathologies associated with low RGS2 protein levels, such as hypertension, heart failure, and anxiety. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: E3 ligases provide a novel point of intervention for therapeutic development, but progress is hindered by the lack of available information about specific E3-substrate pairs. Here, we provide molecular detail on the recognition of regulator of G protein signaling protein 2 (RGS2) by its E3 ligase, increasing the potential for rational design of small molecule RGS2 protein stabilizers. These would be clinically useful in pathologies associated with low RGS2 protein levels, such as hypertension, heart failure, and anxiety.

A Global Map of G Protein Signaling Regulation by RGS Proteins

SummaryThe control over the extent and timing of G protein signaling is provided by the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that deactivate G protein α subunits (Gα). Mammalian genomes encode 20 canonical RGS and 16 Gα genes with key roles in physiology and disease. To understand the principles governing the selectivity of Gα regulation by RGS, we examine the catalytic activity of all canonical human RGS proteins and their selectivity for a complete set of Gα substrates using real-time kinetic measurements in living cells. The data reveal rules governing RGS-Gα recognition, the structural basis of its selectivity, and provide principles for engineering RGS proteins with defined selectivity. The study also explores the evolution of RGS-Gα selectivity through ancestral reconstruction and demonstrates how naturally occurring non-synonymous variants in RGS alter signaling. These results provide a blueprint for decoding signaling selectivity and advance our understanding of molecular recognition principles.

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins (version 2020.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Regulator of G protein Signaling, or RGS, proteins serve an important regulatory role in signaling mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They all share a common RGS domain that directly interacts with active, GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. RGS proteins stabilize the transition state for GTP hydrolysis on Gα and thus induce a conformational change in the Gα subunit that accelerates GTP hydrolysis, thereby effectively turning off signaling cascades mediated by GPCRs. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity is the canonical mechanism of action for RGS proteins, although many also possess additional functions and domains. RGS proteins are divided into four families, R4, R7, R12 and RZ based on sequence homology, domain structure as well as specificity towards Gα subunits. For reviews on RGS proteins and their potential as therapeutic targets, see e.g. [160, 377, 411, 415, 416, 512, 519, 312, 6].

Emerging Roles for Regulator of G Protein Signaling 2 in (Patho)physiology.

Since their discovery in the mid-1990s, regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins have emerged as key regulators of signaling through G protein-coupled receptors. Among the over 20 known RGS proteins, RGS2 has received increasing interest as a potential therapeutic drug target with broad clinical implications. RGS2 is a member of the R4 subfamily of RGS proteins and is unique in that it is selective for Gα q Despite only having an RGS domain, responsible for the canonical GTPase activating protein activity, RGS2 can regulate additional processes, such as protein synthesis and adenylate cyclase activity, through protein-protein interactions. Here we provide an update of the current knowledge of RGS2 function as it relates to molecular mechanisms of regulation as well as its potential role in regulating a number of physiologic systems and pathologies, including cardiovascular disease and central nervous system disorders, as well as various forms of cancer. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins represent an exciting class of novel drug targets. RGS2, in particular, could have broad clinical importance. As more details are emerging on the regulation of RGS2 in various physiological systems, the potential utility of this small protein in therapeutic development is increasing.