Regulators Of G Protein Signaling Proteins Research Articles

The role of regulator of G protein signaling 4 in delta-opioid receptor-mediated behaviors.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins act as negative modulators of G protein signaling. RGS4 has been shown to negatively modulate G protein signaling mediated by the delta opioid receptor (DOPr) in vitro. However, the role of RGS4 in modulating DOPr-mediated behaviors in vivo has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the DOPr agonist SNC80 to induce DOPr-mediated antinociception, antihyperalgesia, antidepressant-like effects, and convulsions in wild-type and RGS4 knockout mice. Antinociception was assessed in the acetic acid stretch assay. Antihyperalgesia was measured in a nitroglycerin-induced thermal hyperalgesia assay. Antidepressant-like effects were evaluated in the forced swim and tail suspension tests. Mice were also observed for convulsive activity post-SNC80 treatment. SNC80-induced phosphorylation of MAP kinase in striatal tissue from RGS4 wild-type and knockout mice was quantified by Western blot. DOPr number from forebrain tissue was measured using [3H]DPDPE saturation binding. Elimination of RGS4 potentiated SNC80-induced antinociception and antihyperalgesia. SNC80-induced antidepressant-like effects were potentiated in RGS4 knockout mice in the forced swim test but not in the tail suspension test. Additionally, RGS4 knockout did not alter SNC80-induced convulsions. SNC80-induced phosphorylation of MAP kinase was potentiated in striatum from RGS4 knockout mice. Loss of RGS4 did not affect total DOPr number. Overall, these findings demonstrate that reduction of RGS4 functionally may increase the therapeutic index of SNC80. These results provide the first evidence of differential regulation of DOPr-mediated behaviors by RGS proteins and G protein signaling pathways.

The regulator of G-protein signaling RGS16 promotes insulin secretion and β-cell proliferation in rodent and human islets

ObjectiveG protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling regulates insulin secretion and pancreatic β cell-proliferation. While much knowledge has been gained regarding how GPCRs are activated in β cells, less is known about the mechanisms controlling their deactivation. In many cell types, termination of GPCR signaling is controlled by the family of Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS). RGS proteins are expressed in most eukaryotic cells and ensure a timely return to the GPCR inactive state upon removal of the stimulus. The aims of this study were i) to determine if RGS16, the most highly enriched RGS protein in β cells, regulates insulin secretion and β-cell proliferation and, if so, ii) to elucidate the mechanisms underlying such effects. MethodsMouse and human islets were infected with recombinant adenoviruses expressing shRNA or cDNA sequences to knock-down or overexpress RGS16, respectively. 60 h post-infection, insulin secretion and cAMP levels were measured in static incubations in the presence of glucose and various secretagogues. β-cell proliferation was measured in infected islets after 72 h in the presence of 16.7 mM glucose ± somatostatin and various inhibitors. ResultsRGS16 mRNA levels are strongly up-regulated in islets of Langerhans under hyperglycemic conditions in vivo and ex vivo. RGS16 overexpression stimulated glucose-induced insulin secretion in isolated mouse and human islets while, conversely, insulin secretion was impaired following RGS16 knock-down. Insulin secretion was no longer affected by RGS16 knock-down when islets were pre-treated with pertussis toxin to inactivate Gαi/o proteins, or in the presence of a somatostatin receptor antagonist. RGS16 overexpression increased intracellular cAMP levels, and its effects were blocked by an adenylyl cyclase inhibitor. Finally, RGS16 overexpression prevented the inhibitory effect of somatostatin on insulin secretion and β-cell proliferation. ConclusionsOur results identify RGS16 as a novel regulator of β-cell function that coordinately controls insulin secretion and proliferation by limiting the tonic inhibitory signal exerted by δ-cell-derived somatostatin in islets.

RGS14 regulates the lifetime of Gα-GTP signaling but does not prolong Gβγ signaling following receptor activation in live cells.

RGS14 is a multifunctional scaffolding protein possessing two distinct G protein interaction sites including a regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) domain that acts as a GTPase activating protein (GAP) to deactivate Gαi/o‐GTP proteins, and a G protein regulatory (GPR) motif that binds inactive Gαi1/3‐GDP proteins independent of Gβγ. GPR interactions with Gαi recruit RGS14 to the plasma membrane to interact with Gαi‐linked GPCRs and regulate Gαi signaling. While RGS14 actions on Gα proteins are well characterized, consequent effects on Gβγ signaling remain unknown. Conventional RGS proteins act as dedicated GAPs to deactivate Gα and Gβγ signaling following receptor activation. RGS14 may do the same or, alternatively, may coordinate its actions to deactivate Gα‐GTP with the RGS domain and then capture the same Gα‐GDP via its GPR motif to prevent heterotrimer reassociation and prolong Gβγ signaling. To test this idea, we compared the regulation of G protein activation and deactivation kinetics by a conventional RGS protein, RGS4, and RGS14 in response to GPCR agonist/antagonist treatment utilizing bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Co‐expression of either RGS4 or RGS14 inhibited the release of free Gβγ after agonist stimulation and increased the deactivation rate of Gα, consistent with their roles as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Overexpression of inactive Gαi1 to recruit RGS14 to the plasma membrane did not alter RGS14′s capacity to act as a GAP for a second Gαo protein. These results demonstrate the role of RGS14 as a dedicated GAP and suggest that the G protein regulatory (GPR) motif functions independently of the RGS domain and is silent in regulating GAP activity in a cellular context.

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 blocked aldosterone synthesis in a human adrenocortical cell line.

A recent clinical study indicated that an angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT1) receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) designated LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan, as combined sodium complex) was superior to enalapril at reducing the risks of death and hospitalization due to heart failure. Therefore, we investigated the possible mechanisms of the beneficial effect of LCZ696, in which the inhibition of neprilysin enhances atrial natriuretic peptide (NP) or brain NP (ANP or BNP)-evoked signals that can block Ang II/AT1 receptor-induced aldosterone (Ald) synthesis in human adrenocortical cells. The binding affinity of valsartan+LBQ657 (active moiety of sacubitril) to the AT1 receptor was greater than that of valsartan alone in an AT1 receptor-expressing human embryonic kidney cell-based assay. There was no difference in the dissociation from the AT1 receptor between valsartan+LBQ657 and valsartan alone. In Ang II-sensitized human adrenocortical cells, ANP or BNP alone, but not LBQ657 or valsartan alone, significantly decreased Ald synthesis. The level of suppression of Ald synthesis by ANP or BNP with LBQ657 was greater than that by ANP or BNP without LBQ657. The suppression of ANP was blocked by inhibitors of regulator of G-protein signaling proteins and cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase. The inhibition of neprilysin did not change the mRNA levels of the AT1 receptor, ANP receptor A, regulator of G-protein signaling protein, renin or 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. In conclusion, the inhibition of neprilysin by LBQ657 enhances the NP-evoked signals that can block Ang II/AT1 receptor-induced Ald synthesis in human adrenocortical cells.

Post-cocaine changes in regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins in the dorsal striatum: Relevance for cocaine-seeking and protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation.

Persistent cocaine-induced neuroadaptations within the cortico-striatal circuitry might be related to elevated risk of relapse observed in human addicts even after months or years of drug-free abstinence. Identification of these neuroadaptations may lead development of novel, neurobiologically-based treatments of relapse. In the current study, 12 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats self-administered cocaine (or received yoked-saline) for two weeks followed by three weeks of home-cage abstinence. At this point, we analyzed expression of proteins involved in regulation of Gαi- and Gαq-protein signaling in the dorsal striatum (dSTR). Animals abstinent from chronic cocaine showed decreased expression of regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2) and RGS4, as well as upregulation of RGS9. These data, together with the increased ratio of Gαq-to-Gαi proteins indicated, "sensitized" Gαq signaling in the dSTR of abstinent cocaine animals. To evaluate activation of Gαq signaling during relapse, another group of abstinent cocaine animals (and yoked saline controls, 22 rats together) was reintroduced to the cocaine context and PKC-mediated phosphorylation in the dSTR was analyzed. Re-exposure to the cocaine context triggered cocaine seeking and increase in phosphorylation of cellular PKC substrates, including phospho-ERK and phospho-CREB. In conclusion, this study demonstrates persistent dysregulation of RGS proteins in the dSTR of abstinent cocaine animals that may produce an imbalance in local Gαq-to-Gαi signaling. This imbalance might be related to augmented PKC-mediated phosphorylation during relapse to cocaine-seeking. Future studies will address whether selective targeting of RGS proteins in the dSTR can be utilized to suppress PKC-mediated phosphorylation and relapse to cocaine-seeking.

Regulator of G-protein signalling and GoLoco proteins suppress TRPC4 channel function via acting at Gαi/o.

Transient receptor potential canonical 4 (TRPC4) forms non-selective cation channels implicated in the regulation of diverse physiological functions. Previously, TRPC4 was shown to be activated by the Gi/o subgroup of heterotrimeric G-proteins involving Gαi/o, rather than Gβγ, subunits. Because the lifetime and availability of Gα-GTP are regulated by regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) and Gαi/o-Loco (GoLoco) domain-containing proteins via their GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and guanine-nucleotide-dissociation inhibitor (GDI) functions respectively, we tested how RGS and GoLoco domain proteins affect TRPC4 currents activated via Gi/o-coupled receptors. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we show that both RGS and GoLoco proteins [RGS4, RGS6, RGS12, RGS14, LGN or activator of G-protein signalling 3 (AGS3)] suppress receptor-mediated TRPC4 activation without causing detectable basal current or altering surface expression of the channel protein. The inhibitory effects are dependent on the GAP and GoLoco domains and facilitated by enhancing membrane targeting of the GoLoco protein AGS3. In addition, RGS, but not GoLoco, proteins accelerate desensitization of receptor-activation evoked TRPC4 currents. The inhibitory effects of RGS and GoLoco domains are additive and are most prominent with RGS12 and RGS14, which contain both RGS and GoLoco domains. Our data support the notion that the Gα, but not Gβγ, arm of the Gi/o signalling is involved in TRPC4 activation and unveil new roles for RGS and GoLoco domain proteins in fine-tuning TRPC4 activities. The versatile and diverse functions of RGS and GoLoco proteins in regulating G-protein signalling may underlie the complexity of receptor-operated TRPC4 activation in various cell typesunder different conditions.

A High Throughput Screening Campaign for Inhibitors of RGS6 and RGS17

G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are highly targeted proteins for drug discovery, with over 50% of all drugs on the market targeting these receptors. Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Proteins regulate the signaling cascade of GPCRs by accelerating the intrinsic GTPase activity of G protein alpha subunits and returning the heterotrimeric G protein to its inactive state. Recently RGS proteins have been implicated as being important in a variety of disease states. RGS17 has been identified as being inappropriately upregulated in both lung and prostate cancer. Knockdown of RGS17 resulted in decreased cell proliferation in vitro, and reduced tumor mass and volume when compared to control when cell lines were injected subcutaneously in nude mice. RGS6 has been shown to play an essential role in doxorubicin mediated cardio toxicity, has been shown to have an important role in anxiolytic and depression phenotypes in mice, and has been implicated as a critical mediator of behavioral and pathological responses to alcohol. Here we present the screening of two RGS proteins (RGS6 and RGS17) using Alpha Screen technology against the NCI Next Diversity Library. Assay robustness was determined for both proteins, with RGS6 Z‐factors above 0.7 and RGS17 Z‐factors above 0.6. Approximately 20,000 compounds were screened against RGS6 resulting in identification of 20 hit compounds, and roughly 60,000 compounds (including the 20K also screened against RGS6) were screened against RGS17 resulting in the identification of 131 hit compounds. Tanimoto similarity analysis was performed on all hits to allow for small scale SAR analysis of confirmed lead compounds. Follow up experiments are under way including dose response analysis and structure based analysis utilizing NMR and molecular modeling.Support or Funding InformationSupported in part by RO1CA160470, in part by OVPRED internal funding initiative RAF‐DLR and in part by a Pre‐Doctoral Fellowship from the American Foundation of Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE)

Regulator of G Protein Signaling 7 (RGS7) Can Exist in a Homo-oligomeric Form That Is Regulated by Gαo and R7-binding Protein

RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) proteins of the R7 subfamily (RGS6, -7, -9, and -11) are highly expressed in neurons where they regulate many physiological processes. R7 RGS proteins contain several distinct domains and form obligatory dimers with the atypical Gβ subunit, Gβ5 They also interact with other proteins such as R7-binding protein, R9-anchoring protein, and the orphan receptors GPR158 and GPR179. These interactions facilitate plasma membrane targeting and stability of R7 proteins and modulate their activity. Here, we investigated RGS7 complexes using in situ chemical cross-linking. We found that in mouse brain and transfected cells cross-linking causes formation of distinct RGS7 complexes. One of the products had the apparent molecular mass of ∼150 kDa on SDS-PAGE and did not contain Gβ5 Mass spectrometry analysis showed no other proteins to be present within the 150-kDa complex in the amount close to stoichiometric with RGS7. This finding suggested that RGS7 could form a homo-oligomer. Indeed, co-immunoprecipitation of differentially tagged RGS7 constructs, with or without chemical cross-linking, demonstrated RGS7 self-association. RGS7-RGS7 interaction required the DEP domain but not the RGS and DHEX domains or the Gβ5 subunit. Using transfected cells and knock-out mice, we demonstrated that R7-binding protein had a strong inhibitory effect on homo-oligomerization of RGS7. In contrast, our data indicated that GPR158 could bind to the RGS7 homo-oligomer without causing its dissociation. Co-expression of constitutively active Gαo prevented the RGS7-RGS7 interaction. These results reveal the existence of RGS protein homo-oligomers and show regulation of their assembly by R7 RGS-binding partners.

Differential role of G protein signaling regulator RGS7 on rewarding effects of opioids and psychostimulants

The endogenous opioid system is critical for natural reward responses that drive positive behavioral reinforcement, as well as the reinforcing effects associated with addictive substances, such as morphine. The rewarding and reinforcing properties of many drugs of abuse depend on the activation of the m‐opioid receptor (MOR). MOR is a G‐protein coupled receptor whose signaling efficiency is controlled by the regulator of G‐protein signaling (RGS) proteins. In vitro studies have demonstrated that RGS7, a member of the R7 family of RGS proteins, negatively regulates MOR signaling via inhibitory G‐proteins of the Gi/o class. Co‐labeling studies performed in the CNS show that RGS7 and MOR are co‐expressed in the same neuronal population. However, the impact of RGS7 on MOR signaling in vivo is unknown. This study utilizes both genetic and viral approaches to ablate RGS7 both globally and in specific neuronal populations to determine the contribution of RGS7 in reward‐related behaviors. Global RGS7 knockout mice display enhanced morphine‐induced conditional place preference (CPP) and increased locomotor activity in response to morphine. Conditional elimination of RGS7 in striatal neurons results in similar enhancement of morphine‐induced reward in the CPP test. Using an operant self‐administration task these conditional RGS7 knockout mice also displayed increase active lever pressing, as well as a vertically shifted dose‐response profile of morphine‐intake. Together this suggests that RGS7 modulates the reinforcing properties of morphine. To investigate the impact RGS7 has on morphine‐induced alteration in neuronal excitability and plasticity of glutamatergic synapse, electrophysiology approaches were applied to those mice that underwent morphine self‐administration. It was found that RGS7 exerted its effects by controlling morphine‐induced changes in excitability of medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and gating the compositional plasticity of AMPA and NMDA receptors. We further studied the role of RGS7 in reward‐related behaviors in response to other drugs of abuse, such as psychostimulants. Interestingly, mice lacking RGS7 KO exhibit similar responses to cocaine‐induced CPP as their wild‐type littermates. Overall, the results show that RGS7 in the NAc specifically control the rewarding and reinforcing effects of opioids but not of psychostimulants.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants DA026405, DA036082, and DA036596 and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Fellowship.

RGS6 as a Novel Therapeutic Target in CNS Diseases and Cancer.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are gatekeepers regulating the cellular responses induced by G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Specifically, RGS proteins determine the magnitude and duration of GPCR signaling by acting as a GTPase-activating protein for Gα subunits, an activity facilitated by their semiconserved RGS domain. The R7 subfamily of RGS proteins is distinguished by two unique domains, DEP/DHEX and GGL, which mediate membrane targeting and stability of these proteins. RGS6, a member of the R7 subfamily, has been shown to specifically modulate Gαi/o protein activity which is critically important in the central nervous system (CNS) for neuronal responses to a wide array of neurotransmitters. As such, RGS6 has been implicated in several CNS pathologies associated with altered neurotransmission, including the following: alcoholism, anxiety/depression, and Parkinson's disease. In addition, unlike other members of the R7 subfamily, RGS6 has been shown to regulate G protein-independent signaling mechanisms which appear to promote both apoptotic and growth-suppressive pathways that are important in its tumor suppressor function in breast and possibly other tissues. Further highlighting the importance of RGS6 as a target in cancer, RGS6 mediates the chemotherapeutic actions of doxorubicin and blocks reticular activating system (Ras)-induced cellular transformation by promoting degradation of DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) to prevent its silencing of pro-apoptotic and tumor suppressor genes. Together, these findings demonstrate the critical role of RGS6 in regulating both G protein-dependent CNS pathology and G protein-independent cancer pathology implicating RGS6 as a novel therapeutic target.

Intermolecular Interaction between Anchoring Subunits Specify Subcellular Targeting and Function of RGS Proteins in Retina ON-Bipolar Neurons.

In vertebrate retina, light responses generated by the rod photoreceptors are transmitted to the second-order neurons, the ON-bipolar cells (ON-BC), and this communication is indispensible for vision in dim light. In ON-BCs, synaptic transmission is initiated by the metabotropic glutamate receptor, mGluR6, that signals via the G-protein Go to control opening of the effector ion channel, TRPM1. A key role in this process belongs to the GTPase Activating Protein (GAP) complex that catalyzes Go inactivation upon light-induced suppression of glutamate release in rod photoreceptors, thereby driving ON-BC depolarization to changes in synaptic input. The GAP complex has a striking molecular complexity. It contains two Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins RGS7 and RGS11 that directly act on Go and two adaptor subunits: RGS Anchor Protein (R9AP) and the orphan receptor, GPR179. Here we examined the organizational principles of the GAP complex in ON-BCs. Biochemical experiments revealed that RGS7 binds to a conserved site in GPR179 and that RGS11 in vivo forms a complex only with R9AP. R9AP and GPR179 are further integrated via direct protein-protein interactions involving their cytoplasmic domains. Elimination of GPR179 prevents postsynaptic accumulation of R9AP. Furthermore, concurrent knock-out of both R9AP and RGS7 does not reconfigure the GAP complex and completely abolishes synaptic transmission, resulting in a novel mouse model of night blindness. Based on these results, we propose a model of hierarchical assembly and function of the GAP complex that supports ON-BCs visual signaling.

Association with the Plasma Membrane Is Sufficient for Potentiating Catalytic Activity of Regulators of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Proteins of the R7 Subfamily

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) promote deactivation of heterotrimeric G proteins thus controlling the magnitude and kinetics of responses mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). In the nervous system, RGS7 and RGS9-2 play essential role in vision, reward processing, and movement control. Both RGS7 and RGS9-2 belong to the R7 subfamily of RGS proteins that form macromolecular complexes with R7-binding protein (R7BP). R7BP targets RGS proteins to the plasma membrane and augments their GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity, ultimately accelerating deactivation of G protein signaling. However, it remains unclear if R7BP serves exclusively as a membrane anchoring subunit or further modulates RGS proteins to increase their GAP activity. To directly answer this question, we utilized a rapidly reversible chemically induced protein dimerization system that enabled us to control RGS localization independent from R7BP in living cells. To monitor kinetics of Gα deactivation, we coupled this strategy with measuring changes in the GAP activity by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay in a cellular system containing μ-opioid receptor. This approach was used to correlate changes in RGS localization and activity in the presence or absence of R7BP. Strikingly, we observed that RGS activity is augmented by membrane recruitment, in an orientation independent manner with no additional contributions provided by R7BP. These findings argue that the association of R7 RGS proteins with the membrane environment provides a major direct contribution to modulation of their GAP activity.

Structure of the Regulator of G Protein Signaling 8 (RGS8)-Gαq Complex: MOLECULAR BASIS FOR Gα SELECTIVITY

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins interact with activated Gα subunits via their RGS domains and accelerate the hydrolysis of GTP. Although the R4 subfamily of RGS proteins generally accepts both Gαi/o and Gαq/11 subunits as substrates, the R7 and R12 subfamilies select against Gαq/11. In contrast, only one RGS protein, RGS2, is known to be selective for Gαq/11. The molecular basis for this selectivity is not clear. Previously, the crystal structure of RGS2 in complex with Gαq revealed a non-canonical interaction that could be due to interfacial differences imposed by RGS2, the Gα subunit, or both. To resolve this ambiguity, the 2.6 Å crystal structure of RGS8, an R4 subfamily member, was determined in complex with Gαq. RGS8 adopts the same pose on Gαq as it does when bound to Gαi3, indicating that the non-canonical interaction of RGS2 with Gαq is due to unique features of RGS2. Based on the RGS8-Gαq structure, residues in RGS8 that contact a unique α-helical domain loop of Gαq were converted to those typically found in R12 subfamily members, and the reverse substitutions were introduced into RGS10, an R12 subfamily member. Although these substitutions perturbed their ability to stimulate GTP hydrolysis, they did not reverse selectivity. Instead, selectivity for Gαq seems more likely determined by whether strong contacts can be maintained between α6 of the RGS domain and Switch III of Gαq, regions of high sequence and conformational diversity in both protein families.

Regulator of G Protein Signaling 17 as a Negative Modulator of GPCR Signaling in Multiple Human Cancers.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling networks by terminating signals produced by active Gα subunits. RGS17, a member of the RZ subfamily of RGS proteins, is typically only expressed in appreciable amounts in the human central nervous system, but previous works have shown that RGS17 expression is selectively upregulated in a number of malignancies, including lung, breast, prostate, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, this upregulation of RGS17 is associated with a more aggressive cancer phenotype, as increased proliferation, migration, and invasion are observed. Conversely, decreased RGS17 expression diminishes the response of ovarian cancer cells to agents commonly used during chemotherapy. These somewhat contradictory roles of RGS17 in cancer highlight the need for selective, high-affinity inhibitors of RGS17 to use as chemical probes to further the understanding of RGS17 biology. Based on current evidence, these compounds could potentially have clinical utility as novel chemotherapeutics in the treatment of lung, prostate, breast, and liver cancers. Recent advances in screening technologies to identify potential inhibitors coupled with increasing knowledge of the structural requirements of RGS-Gα protein-protein interaction inhibitors make the future of drug discovery efforts targeting RGS17 promising. This review highlights recent findings related to RGS17 as both a canonical and atypical RGS protein, its role in various human disease states, and offers insights on small molecule inhibition of RGS17.

Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS)1 and RGS10 Proteins as Potential Drug Targets for Neuroinflammatory and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins were originally identified as negative regulators of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling via their GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity. All RGS proteins contain evolutionarily conserved RGS domain; however, they differ in their size and regulatory domains. RGS1 and RGS10 are smaller than other RGS proteins, and their functions involve various inflammatory responses including autoimmune responses in both the periphery and the central nervous system (CNS). Neuroinflammation is the chronic inflammatory response in the CNS. Acute inflammatory response in the CNS is believed to be beneficial by involving the neuroprotective actions of immune cells in the brain, particularly microglia, to limit tissue damage and to aid in neuronal repair. However, chronically elevated levels of cytokines serve to maintain activation of abundant numbers of immune cells potentiating prolonged inflammatory responses and creating an environment of oxidative stress, which further hastens oxidative damage of neurons. In this review, we describe the implications and features of RGS proteins (specifically RGS1 and RGS10) in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. We will discuss the experimental and epidemiological evidence on the benefits of anti-inflammatory interventions by targeting RGS1 and/or RGS10 protein function or expression in order to delay or attenuate the progression of neurodegeneration, particularly in multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD).

Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) and Goloco Proteins Suppress TRPC4 Channel Function via Acting at GAI/O

Transient Receptor Potential Canonical 4 (TRPC4) forms non-selective cation channels implicated in the regulation of diverse physiological functions, including smooth muscle contractility, synaptic transmission, and neurodegeneration. Unique among TRPC subfamily members, TRPC4 activation is dependent on Gi/o subgroup of heterotrimeric G proteins in addition to stimulation of phospholipase C pathway. Previously, the Gi/o, rather than Gbetgamma, subunits were suggested to mediate Gi/o-induced TRPC4 activation. Because the lifetime and availability of Galpha-GTP are regulated by Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and GoLoco domain-containing proteins via their GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibition (GDI) functions, respectively, we tested how RGS and GoLoco domain proteins affect TRPC4 currents activated via Gi/o-coupled receptors. Using whole-cell patch clamp recordings, we show that both RGS (RGS4, RGS6, RGS12, or RGS14) and GoLoco domain proteins (LGN, AGS3, RGS12, or RGS14) suppress receptor-mediated TRPC4 activation without eliciting any basal current. The inhibitory effects are dependent on the GAP and GoLoco domains and facilitated by enhancing membrane targeting of the GoLoco domains of AGS3. In addition, the Gi/o-specific RGS proteins, but not the GoLoco domain proteins, accelerate desensitization of receptor activation-evoked TRPC4 currents. We found that the inhibitory effects of RGS and GoLoco domains are additive and are most prominent with RGS proteins that contain both the RGS and GoLoco domains, i.e. RGS12 and RGS14. Our data support the notion that the Galpha, but not Gbetagamma, arm of the Gi/o signaling is involved in TRPC4 activation and indicate that acting through Gi/o via GAP and GDI functions, RGS and GoLoco domain proteins can fine tune TRPC4 activity and thereby allow delicate regulation of cellular functions in nervous and other systems.

RGS Proteins and Gαi2 Modulate Sleep, Wakefulness, and Disruption of Sleep/ Wake States after Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Anesthesia.

This study tested the hypothesis that Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) proteins contribute to the regulation of wakefulness, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and to sleep disruption caused by volatile anesthetics. The three groups used in this study included wild-type (WT; n = 7) mice and knock-in mice that were heterozygous (+/GS; n = 7) or homozygous (GS/GS; n = 7) for an RGS-insensitive allele that causes prolonged Gαi2 signaling. Mice were implanted with electrodes for recording sleep and conditioned for 1 week or more to sleep in the laboratory. Using within and between groups designs, 24-h recordings of wakefulness, NREM sleep, and REM sleep were compared across three interventions: (1) baseline (control) and after 3 h of being anesthetized with (2) isoflurane or (3) sevoflurane. Baseline recordings during the light phase revealed that relative to WT mice, homozygous RGS-insensitive (GS/GS) mice exhibit significantly increased wakefulness and decreased NREM and REM sleep. During the dark phase, these state-specific differences remained significant but reversed direction of change. After cessation of isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia there was a long-lasting and significant disruption of sleep and wakefulness. The durations of average episodes of wakefulness, NREM sleep, and REM sleep were significantly altered as a function of genotype and isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. RGS proteins and Gαi2 play a significant role in regulating states of wakefulness, NREM sleep, and REM sleep. Genotype-specific differences demonstrate that RGS proteins modulate sleep disruption caused by isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. The results also support the conclusion that isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia do not satisfy the homeostatic drive for sleep.

RGS10 deficiency ameliorates the severity of disease in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

BackgroundRegulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) family proteins, which are GTPase accelerating proteins (GAPs) that negatively regulate G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are known to be important modulators of immune cell activation and function. Various single-nucleotide polymorphisms in RGS proteins highly correlate with increased risk for multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune, neurodegenerative disorder. An in-depth search of the gene expression omnibus profile database revealed higher levels of RGS10 and RGS1 transcripts in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in MS patients, suggesting potential functional roles for RGS proteins in MS etiology and/or progression.MethodsTo define potential roles for RGS10 in regulating autoimmune responses, we evaluated RGS10-null and wild-type (WT) mice for susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a widely studied model of MS. Leukocyte distribution and functional responses were assessed using biochemical, immunohistological, and flow cytometry approaches.ResultsRGS10-null mice displayed significantly milder clinical symptoms of EAE with reduced disease incidence and severity, as well as delayed onset. We observed fewer CD3+ T lymphocytes and CD11b+ myeloid cells in the central nervous system (CNS) tissues of RGS10-null mice with myelin oligodendrocyte protein (MOG)35–55-induced EAE. Lymph node cells and splenocytes of immunized RGS10-null mice demonstrated decreased proliferative and cytokine responses in response to in vitro MOG memory recall challenge. In adoptive recipients, transferred myelin-reactive RGS10-null Th1 cells (but not Th17 cells) induced EAE that was less severe than their WT counterparts.ConclusionsThese data demonstrate a critical role for RGS10 in mediating autoimmune disease through regulation of T lymphocyte function. This is the first study ever conducted to elucidate the function of RGS10 in effector lymphocytes in the context of EAE. The identification of RGS10 as an important regulator of inflammation might open possibilities for the development of more specific therapies for MS.

RGS proteins as targets in the treatment of intestinal inflammation and visceral pain: New insights and future perspectives

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins provide timely termination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) responses. Serving as a central control point in GPCR signaling cascades, RGS proteins are promising targets for drug development. In this review, we discuss the involvement of RGS proteins in the pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal inflammation and their potential to become a target for anti-inflammatory drugs. Specifically, we evaluate the emerging evidence for modulation of selected receptor families: opioid, cannabinoid and serotonin by RGS proteins. We discuss how the regulation of RGS protein level and activity may modulate immunological pathways involved in the development of intestinal inflammation. Finally, we propose that RGS proteins may serve as a prognostic factor for survival rate in colorectal cancer. The ideas introduced in this review set a novel conceptual framework for the utilization of RGS proteins in the treatment of gastrointestinal inflammation, a growing major concern worldwide.

Potent inhibition of angiotensin AT1 receptor signaling by RGS8: importance of the C-terminal third exon part of its RGS domain

R4/B subfamily RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) proteins play roles in regulation of many GPCR-mediated responses. Multiple RGS proteins are usually expressed in a cell, and it is difficult to point out which RGS protein species are functionally important in the cell. To evaluate intrinsic potency of these RGS proteins, we compared inhibitory effects of RGS1, RGS2, RGS3, RGS4, RGS5, RGS8 and RGS16 on AT1 receptor signaling. Intracellular Ca2+ responses to angiotensin II were markedly attenuated by transiently expressed RGS2, RGS3 and RGS8, compared to weak inhibition by RGS1, RGS4, RGS5 and RGS16. N-terminally deleted RGS2 (RGS2 domain) lost this potent inhibitory effect, whereas RGS domains of RGS3 and RGS8 showed strong inhibition similar to those of the full-length proteins. To investigate key determinants that specify the differences in potency, we constructed chimeric domains by replacing one or two of three exon parts of RGS8 domain with the corresponding part of RGS5. The chimeric RGS8 domains containing the first or the second exon part of RGS5 showed strong inhibitory effects similar to that of wild type RGS8, but the chimeric domain with the third exon part of RGS5 lost its activity. On the contrary, replacement of the third exon part of RGS5 with the corresponding residues of RGS8 increased the inhibitory effect. The role of the third exon part of RGS8 domain was further confirmed with the chimeric RGS8/RGS4 domains. These results indicate the potent inhibitory activity of RGS8 among R4/B subfamily proteins and importance of the third exon.