For a cardinal κ>1, a space X=(X,T) is κ-resolvable if X admits κ-many pairwise disjoint T-dense subsets; (X,T) is exactly κ-resolvable if it is κ-resolvable but not κ+-resolvable.The present paper complements and supplements the authorsʼ earlier work, which showed for suitably restricted spaces (X,T) and cardinals κ⩾λ⩾ω that (X,T), if κ-resolvable, admits an expansion U⊇T, with (X,U) Tychonoff if (X,T) is Tychonoff, such that (X,U) is μ-resolvable for all μ<λ but is not λ-resolvable (cf. Comfort and Hu, 2010 [11, Theorem 3.3]). Here the “finite case” is addressed. The authors show in ZFC for 1<n<ω: (a) every n-resolvable space (X,T) admits an exactly n-resolvable expansion U⊇T; (b) in some cases, even with (X,T) Tychonoff, no choice of U is available such that (X,U) is regular (nor even quasi-regular); (c) if regular and n-resolvable, (X,T) admits an exactly n-resolvable regular expansion U if and only if either (X,T) is itself exactly n-resolvable or (X,T) has a subspace which is either n-resolvable and nowhere dense or is (2n)-resolvable. In particular, every ω-resolvable regular space admits an exactly n-resolvable regular expansion. Further, for many familiar topological properties P (e.g., Tychonoff; has a clopen basis), one may choose U so that (X,U)∈P if (X,T)∈P.