Considerable interest on the part of policy makers in both the public and private sectors has spawned numerous studies of the determinants of residential electricity demand. As a result of increased attention given to the possibility of adjusting household electricity consumption patterns through price manipulation (as in the various peak-load pricing experiments), particular emphasis has been placed on obtaining an accurate estimate of the price elasticity of demand. Unfortunately, OLS applied to the conventional linear (or log-linear) demand specification is biased and inconsistent when the sample includes households that face declining-block rate schedules. The inconsistency results from the fact that, in the presence of declining-block rates, observed marginal price is a stochastic regressor that is negatively correlated with the regression error term. Some researchers have suggested that consistent OLS estimation can be achieved by merely respecifying the demand equation to include particular combinations of marginal price, average price, rate of decline of the price schedule, and real income corrected for intra-marginal price differences [1; 7; 8]. Others, realizing the futility of such an approach, have developed and applied instrumental variable (IV) techniques [4; 6; 11]. These IV methods, however, all involve an artificial linearization of the rate schedule which produces spurious negative correlation between the price variable and the random error term. As a result, such IV methods tend to overcompensate for actual correlation. Consequently, the IV estimated coefficients of the various demand determinants will exhibit biases opposite in sign to those of their OLS counterparts. For example, in the presence of declining-block rates, OLS tends to overestimate the price elasticity of demand (in absolute value), while IV methods produce elasticity estimates that are downward biased. A Two-Stage Probit (TSP) method developed by Terza and Welch [10] is not subject to the bias that plagues IV methods because TSP does not require a linear approximation to the rate schedule. Instead, the discrete and discontinuous nature of household responses to declining-block pricing is captured by incorporating an ordinal probit model that is based on a theory of consumer choice. In the present paper a linear electricity demand model is estimated using the TSP, OLS, and IV methods to demonstrate the effectiveness of the TSP method.