Japan Registry Research Articles

Doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy, or doublet chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer (JCOG1109 NExT): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

Neoadjuvant therapy is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the prognosis remains poor and more intensive neoadjuvant treatment might be needed to improve patient outcomes. We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy, and doublet chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced OSCC. In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, patients aged 20-75 years with previously untreated locally advanced OSCC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were recruited from 44 centres across Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) centrally via a web-based system to receive neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy (two courses of fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 per day intravenously on days 1-5] and cisplatin [80 mg/m2 per day on day 1] separated by an interval of 3 weeks [NeoCF]), triplet chemotherapy (three courses of fluorouracil [750 mg/m2 per day on days 1-5], cisplatin [70 mg/m2 per day on day 1], and docetaxel [70 mg/m2 per day on day 1] repeated every 3 weeks [NeoCF+D]), or doublet chemotherapy (two courses of fluorouracil [1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4] and cisplatin [75 mg/m2 per day on day 1] separated by an interval of 4 weeks) plus 41·4 Gy radiotherapy [NeoCF+RT]) followed by oesophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Randomisation was stratified by T stage and institution. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. Analysis of safety included all patients who received at least one course of chemotherapy, and analysis of surgical complications included those who also underwent surgery. This study is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180202, and the trial is complete. A total of 601 patients (529 male individuals and 72 female individuals) were randomly assigned between Dec 5, 2012, and July 20, 2018, with 199 patients in the NeoCF group, 202 patients in the NeoCF+D group, and 200 patients in the NeoCF+RT group. Compared with the NeoCF group, during a median follow-up period of 50·7 months (IQR 23·8-70·7), the 3-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the NeoCF+D group (72·1% [95% CI 65·4-77·8] vs 62·6% [55·5-68·9]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·50-0·92; p=0·006) but not in the NeoCF+RT group (68·3% [61·3-74·3]; HR 0·84, 0·63-1·12; p=0·12). Grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia occurred in two (1%) of 193 patients in the NeoCF group, 32 (16%) of 196 patients in the NeoCF+D group, and nine (5%) of 191 patients in the NeoCF+RT group. Treatment-related adverse events leading to termination of neoadjuvant therapy were more common in the NeoCF+D group (18 [9%] of 202 participants) than in the NeoCF+RT group (12 [6%] of 200) and NeoCF group (eight [4%] of 199). There were three (2%) treatment-related deaths during neoadjuvant therapy in the NeoCF group, four (2%) deaths in the NeoCF+D group, and two (1%) deaths in the NeoCF+RT group. Grade 2 or higher postoperative pneumonia, anastomotic leak, and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis were reported in 19 (10%), 19 (10%), and 28 (15%) of 185 patients, respectively, in the NeoCF group; 18 (10%), 16 (9%), and 19 (10%) of 183 patients, respectively, in the NeoCF+D group; and 23 (13%), 23 (13%), and 17 (10%) of 178 patients, respectively, in the NeoCF+RT group. The in-hospital deaths following surgery included three deaths in the NeoCF group, two deaths in the NeoCF+D group, and one in the NeoCF+RT group. Neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy followed by oesophagectomy resulted in a statistically significant overall survival benefit compared with doublet chemotherapy and might be the new standard of care for locally advanced OSCC who are in good condition in Japan. Neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy plus radiotherapy did not show significant improvement of survival compared with doublet chemotherapy. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund.

Machine learning algorithm for predicting 30-day mortality in patients receiving rapid response system activation: A retrospective nationwide cohort study

This study investigated the accuracy of a machine learning algorithm for predicting mortality in patients receiving rapid response system (RRS) activation. This retrospective cohort study used data from the In-Hospital Emergency Registry in Japan, which collects nationwide data on patients receiving RRS activation. The missing values in the dataset were replaced using multiple imputations (mode imputation, BayseRidge sklearn. linear model, and K-nearest neighbor model), and the enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the training and test cohorts. We established prediction models for 30-day mortality using the following four types of machine learning classifiers: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting, random forest, and neural network. Fifty-two variables (patient characteristics, details of RRS activation, reasons for RRS initiation, and hospital capacity) were used to construct the prediction algorithm. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the prediction model for 30-day mortality. Overall, the data from 4,997 patients across 34 hospitals were analyzed. The machine learning algorithms using LightGBM demonstrated the highest predictive value for 30-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.860 [95 % confidence interval, 0.825–0.895]). The SHapley Additive exPlanations summary plot indicated that hospital capacity, site of incidence, code status, and abnormal vital signs within 24 h were important variables in the prediction model for 30-day mortality.

Phase II study in children and adults under 40 years with newly diagnosed Langerhans cell histiocytosis: protocol for an LCH-19-MSMFB clinical trial in Japan

IntroductionAlthough the prognosis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is excellent, the high recurrence rate and permanent consequences, such as central diabetes insipidus and LCH-associated neurodegenerative diseases, remain to be resolved....

A phase II study of radiotherapy combined with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer.

4029 Background: Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for patients with esophageal cancer have resulted in favorable prognosis, but extended radical esophagectomy with two-field or three-field (neck, mediastinum, and abdomen) lymph node dissection remains a standard treatment. However, there is recurrence in 30-50% of patients who have undergone an operation and there is loco-regional recurrence in 40-55% of patients with postoperative recurrence. The efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy for postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer have been reported, and the survival outcome has been improved; however, the median progression-free survival period according to past reports was 10 to 14 months, which was not enough. Recently, RT with docetaxel (DOC), cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-FU has shown better results than conventional standard treatment (CDDP+5-FU +radiotherapy) for primary esophageal cancer. The purpose of the phase II study was to evaluate the superior of definitive radiotherapy with DOC, CDDP and 5-FU to the standard treatment in patients with loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer after curative resection. Methods: Between 2015 and 2023, this open-label, single-arm, phase II study of radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks without prophylactic region) combined with chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles of DOC (35 mg/m2), CDDP (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2/24 h for 5 days) for patients with postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer was conducted at a single institution. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate. This trial was considered positive if median progression-free survival period was 24.0 months or more, which meaning superiority over conventional standard treatment. The secondary endpoints were overall survival rate and adverse events. This trial was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019269) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021200009). Results: A total of 29 patients were enrolled in this study. The regimen was completed in all the patients. The median observation period for survivors was 60 months (IQR, 30.0-75.5 months). The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 56.2% (95% CI = 37.4-75.0%) with a median progression-free survival period of 62.0 months (95% CI = 35.2-64.7 months). Only 2 patients showed grade 4 hematologic adverse events during chemoradiotherapy, and they had to be performed reduced chemotherapy; however, they also completed 3 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. Grade 2 or higher late toxicity was not observed in any patients. Conclusions: The present protocol of radiotherapy combined with DOC, CDDP and 5-FU is a safe and effective salvage treatment for postoperative loco-regional recurrent esophageal cancer. It might be better than conventional treatment. Clinical trial information: UMIN000019269.

Efficacy and Safety of Ensitrelvir for Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19: An Exploratory Analysis of a Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial.

This phase 2b/3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial explored the efficacy and evaluated the safety of ensitrelvir. This trial involved individuals with asymptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and patients with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The trial was conducted at 57 medical institutions in Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam (study period: January 6-August 14, 2022). Eligible participants were randomized (1:1:1) to the ensitrelvir 125-mg, ensitrelvir 250-mg, or placebo group, received the allocated intervention orally, and were followed up until Day 28. Participants self-rated the severity of 14 typical COVID-19 symptoms and recorded the data in an electronic diary. In total, 572 participants (194, 189, and 189 in the ensitrelvir 125-mg, ensitrelvir 250-mg, and placebo groups, respectively) were included in the intention-to-treat population. Ensitrelvir 125-mg group observed a 77% reduction in the risk of developing any of the 14 COVID-19 symptoms or fever and a 29% reduction in the risk of worsening of such symptoms or fever versus placebo (statistically nonsignificant). The viral RNA, viral titer, and time to infectious viral clearance observed a statistically significant decrease versus placebo. Most treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were mild to moderate in severity, and the most common TEAE observed across groups was a decrease in high-density lipoprotein. Our exploratory results suggest a potential reduction in the risk of development or worsening of COVID-19 symptoms with ensitrelvir. Ensitrelvir showed antiviral efficacy and was well tolerated. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT2031210350.

Novel approach of prophylactic radiation to reduce toxicities comparing 2-step 40 Gy with 56 Gy simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III trial (JCOG1912, NEW BRIDGE).

TPS6121 Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent cisplatin is the standard of care as a nonsurgical definitive treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, CRT is associated with increased severe late adverse events, including swallowing dysfunction, xerostomia, ototoxicity, and hypothyroidism. Few strategies aimed at less invasive CRT without compromising treatment outcomes have been successful. The purpose of this study is to confirm the non-inferiority of reduced dose prophylactic radiation with 40 Gy compared to standard dose prophylactic radiation with 56 Gy in terms of the time to treatment failure (TTF) among patients with clinical stage III-IVB LA-SCCHN. Methods: This study is a multicenter, two-arm, open-label, randomized phase III trial. The main inclusion criteria are as follows: (i) Primary lesions are located in the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. (ii) Histologically proven SCC on biopsy specimens of the primary lesion. Immunohistochemistry reveals p16 negativity in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. (iii) Clinical stage of III, IVA, or IVB (excluding N3a) based on the 8th UICC-TNM classification. Patients are randomized to the standard arm or experimental arm. A total dose of 70 Gy for tumors with concurrent cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 are administered in both arms. For prophylactic field, patients in the standard arm receive a total dose of 56 Gy in 35 fractions for 7 weeks using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB56) and those in the experimental arm receive 40 Gy in 20 fractions using two-step methods for 4 weeks (2-step40). A total of 400 patients will be enrolled from 52 Japanese institutions within 5 years. The primary endpoint is TTF, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, complete response rate, progression-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, acute and late adverse events, quality of life score, and swallowing function score.Patient accrual was started in May 2021 and the study is now open for accrual. A total of 186 patients have been enrolled as of January 2024. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031210100. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031210100 .

Randomized phase III study comparing suspension or continuation of PD-1 pathway blockade for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (SAVE study: JCOG1701).

TPS8659 Background: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1 pathway, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, has significantly improved the efficacy outcomes, namely progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This improvement is underscored by the observation that some patients (pts) who responded to ICIs continued to show a response even after discontinuing the treatment. Consequently, cessation of ICIs may not adversely impact OS, while potentially reducing immune-related toxicity and financial burden. Methods: The JCOG1701 is a multi-institutional, two-armed, open-label, randomized phase III trial. The objective of this study is to confirm the non-inferiority of suspension of ICIs to their continuation in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who have shown a positive response to ICIs for 12 months or longer. For patients in the suspension arm who experience disease progression, re-initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is conducted. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the continuation or discontinuation arms. Randomization was performed by the minimization method using the institution, histology (squamous vs. non-squamous), and drug/timing parameters (first-line pembrolizumab/atezolizumab vs. second-line atezolizumab vs. second-line nivolumab vs. second-line pembrolizumab vs. combined therapy with chemotherapy) as adjustment factors. The primary endpoint of the trial is OS, while secondary endpoints include PFS, time to treatment failure of strategy, response rate, PFS post resumption of ICIs, and safety. In the periodical blinded monitoring, the pooled Kaplan-Meier curve for OS seemed significantly better than planned. This motivated to change the primary analysis method from hazard ratio to a difference in 6-year restricted mean survival time with a non-inferiority margin of 5.6 months. With one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 70%, the study aimed to enroll 172 patients assuming that 2-year OS is 94% in both arms. As of Jan 2024, 162 patients have been randomized, with full enrollment projected by Nov 2024. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials as jRCT1031190032. An ancillary study exploring the predictive and prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA is also planned. The findings of the JCOG1701 will provide data for making more informed treatment decisions in advanced NSCLC, specifically related to the continuation or suspension of ICIs. Clinical trial information: CRB3180009 .

JCOG2002: A randomized phase III study of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

TPS8132 Background: Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) has shown a marginal improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for extensive-stage small-cell cancer (ES-SCLC). Consequently, ASTRO and NCCN guidelines conditionally recommend the use of cTRT. Despite the recent establishment of anti-PD-L1 antibody (aPD-L1) combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy as the standard first-line treatment for ES-SCLC, the impact of cTRT in the era of immunotherapy remains uncertain. Methods: The JCOG2002 study, a randomized, multicenter phase 3 trial, initiated in October 2021 to assess the superiority of additional cTRT in terms of OS for ES-SCLC following induction aPD-L1 plus platinum doublet chemotherapy. Eligibility patients must meet criteria for the first registration including ES-SCLC, no prior radiation or chemotherapy history, age 20 or older, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Induction treatment involves atezolizumab + carboplatin + etoposide or durvalumab + cisplatin / carboplatin + etoposide. Responding patients proceed to the second registration, randomization (1:1 between 30 Gy in 10 fractions of cTRT plus aPD-L1 maintenance therapy and maintenance therapy only). The cTRT targets metastatic lymph nodes in stations #1-7 and ipsilateral stations #10-12 identified at diagnosis. The adjustment factors include response to induction treatment (CR/PR versus SD), presence of brain metastasis (yes versus no), participating institutions, and aPD-L1 type (atezolizumab versus durvalumab). The primary endpoint is OS, with secondary endpoints being PFS and safety. The study aims to enroll 240 randomized patients, with 330 in the first registration, providing 80 % power at a one-sided 5 % significance level to detect a hazard ratio of 0.69 with 3-year accrual period and 1-year follow-up. As of February 6, 2024, 239 patients initiated induction treatment, and 121 have been randomized. This trial is registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031210393 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/detail/jRCTs031210393). Clinical trial information: jRCTs031210393 .

Clinical outcomes of adjusted-dose versus standard-dose prasugrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction

BackgroundThe comparative efficacy and safety of adjusted- and standard-dose prasugrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. This study aimed to comparatively assess the ischaemic and bleeding outcomes of adjusted-dose (maintenance dose: 3.75 mg) and standard-dose (maintenance dose: 10 mg) prasugrel in East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI. MethodsFrom a combined dataset sourced from nationwide AMI registries in Japan and South Korea (n = 17,118), patients treated with either adjusted- or standard-dose prasugrel were identified. Patients who did not undergo emergent PCI, those on oral anticoagulants, and those meeting the criteria of contraindication of prasugrel in South Korea (age ≥ 75 years, body weight < 60 kg, or history of stroke) were excluded. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding events were compared between the adjusted-dose (n = 1160) and standard-dose (n = 1086) prasugrel groups. ResultsWithin the propensity-matched cohort (n = 702 in each group), no significant difference was observed in the in-hospital MACE between the adjusted- and standard-dose prasugrel groups (1.85% vs. 2.71%, odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33–1.38, p = 0.286). However, the incidence of in-hospital major bleeding was significantly lower in the adjusted-dose prasugrel group than in the standard-dose group (0.43% vs. 1.71%, OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07–0.88, p = 0.031). The cumulative 12-month incidence of MACE was equivalent in both groups (4.70% vs. 4.70%, OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.61–1.64, p = 1.000). ConclusionsAmong East Asian patients with AMI undergoing PCI, those administered adjusted-dose prasugrel exhibited a lower risk of in-hospital bleeding events than those administered standard-dose prasugrel, while maintaining a comparable 1-year incidence of MACE.

Treatment rationale and protocol design: an investigator-initiated phase II study of combination treatment of nivolumab and TM5614, a PAI-1 inhibitor for previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

There is no established standard 3rd line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents that are not used as 1st or 2nd line treatment are administrated as 3rd line treatment, their anti-tumor efficacy is insufficient. Anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 (PD1) treatment is more effective and less toxic than chemotherapy in anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC. Therefore, anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapy is considered an appropriate 3rd line treatment. However, the anti-tumor efficacy is limited in patients previously treated with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibody. Today, new drugs are needed to increase the efficacy of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies. This open-label, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II study is designed to evaluate combination treatment of nivolumab and TM5614, a plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) inhibitor as 3rd or more line treatment in NSCLC patients who underwent standard treatment. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Recruitment began in September 2023 and is expected to continue for approximately three years. Currently, there is no standard 3rd line treatment for advanced NSCLC, and we hope that the findings of this study will facilitate more effective treatments in this setting. Ethics and dissemination: the study protocol conformed to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients will provide written informed consent prior to enrollment. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed publication. This study is registered to Japan Registry of Clinical Trials with number: jRCT2061230039 (19/July/2023).

Phase II Trial of Romidepsin as Consolidation Therapy after Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin in Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma.

Romidepsin is an important therapeutic option for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). However, the timing of romidepsin administration remains controversial. The objective of this study was to characterize the safety and efficacy of romidepsin as consolidation therapy after gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) therapy (GDPR). This study of patients treated between March 2019 and March 2021 was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number: jRCT0000000519). If complete response, partial response, or stable disease was confirmed after 2-4 GDP cycles, romidepsin was administered every 4 weeks for 1 year. Seven patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) PTCL (T-follicular helper phenotype [n = 1] and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma [n = 6]) were included in this prospective study (PTCL-GDPR). After a median follow-up of 34 months of patients in PTCL-GDPR, the 2-year overall survival rate was 71%, and the overall response rate after treatment was 57%. Common adverse events in patients with PTCL-GDPR included hematological toxicities such as neutropenia, which improved with supportive treatment. There were no treatment-related mortalities. GDPR might be safe and effective in elderly transplant-ineligible patients with R/R PTCL; however, further investigation is required.

Trends in prior antithrombotic medication and risk of in-hospital mortality after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the J-ICH registry

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) remains a devastating form of stroke. Prior use of antiplatelets or warfarin before SICH is associated with poor outcomes, but the effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify trends in prior antithrombotic use and to assess the associations between prior use of antithrombotics and in-hospital mortality using a multicenter prospective registry in Japan. In total, 1085 patients were analyzed. Prior antithrombotic medication included antiplatelets in 14.2%, oral anticoagulants in 8.1%, and both in 1.8%. Prior warfarin use was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 5.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–23.26, P < 0.05) compared to no prior antithrombotic use. No such association was evident between prior DOAC use and no prior antithrombotic use (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.44–4.05, P = 0.606). Concomitant use of antiplatelets and warfarin further increased the in-hospital mortality rate (37.5%) compared to warfarin alone (17.2%), but no such association was found for antiplatelets plus DOACs (8.3%) compared to DOACs alone (11.9%). Prior use of warfarin remains an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality after SICH in the era of DOACs. Further strategies are warranted to reduce SICH among patients receiving oral anticoagulants and to prevent serious outcomes.

The effectiveness of relugolix compared with leuprorelin for preoperative therapy before laparoscopic myomectomy in premenopausal women, diagnosed with uterine fibroids: protocol for a randomized controlled study (MyLacR study)

BackgroundThe oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist relugolix, which temporarily stops menstruation, is used to treat heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure, and low back pain in women with uterine fibroids. Treatment can also help women recover from low hemoglobin levels and possibly shrink the fibroids. However, evidence of preoperative use of relugolix before laparoscopic myomectomy is limited. Nevertheless, the treatment could reduce interoperative blood loss, decrease the risk of developing postoperative anemia, and shorten the operative time. Thus, we aim to test whether 12-week preoperative treatment with relugolix (40 mg orally, once daily) is similar to or not worse than leuprorelin (one injection every 4 weeks) to reduce intraoperative blood loss.MethodsEfficacy and safety of preoperative administration of drugs will be studied in a multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority trial enrolling premenopausal women ≥ 20 years of age, diagnosed with uterine fibroids and scheduled for laparoscopic myomectomy. Participants (n = 80) will be recruited in the clinical setting of participating institutions. The minimization method (predefined factors: presence or absence of fibroids ≥ 9 cm and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] type 1–5 fibroids) with randomization is used in a 1:1 allocation. Relugolix is a 40-mg oral tablet taken once a day before a meal, for 12 weeks, up to the day before surgery. Leuprorelin is a 1.88 mg, or 3.75 mg subcutaneous injection, given in three 4-week intervals during patient visits before the surgery. For the primary outcome measure of intraoperative bleeding, the blood flow is collected from the body cavity, surgical sponges, and collection bag and measured in milliliters. Secondary outcome measures are hemoglobin levels, myoma size, other surgical outcomes, and quality-of-life questionnaire responses (Kupperman Konenki Shogai Index and Uterine Fibroid Symptoms—Quality of Life).DiscussionReal-world evidence will be collected in a clinical setting to use pre-treatment with an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist to reduce intraoperative bleeding in women who undergo laparoscopic myomectomy.Trial registrationjRCTs031210564 was registered on 19 January 2022 in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp).

Cervical percutaneous interferential current stimulation improves citric acid cough tests in patients with Parkinson’s disease on medication

Aspiration pneumonia is the leading cause of death in patients with Parkinson’s disease. The incidence of silent aspiration is high in such patients owing to decreased pharyngeal and laryngeal sensation; thus, interventions for this condition may help prevent pneumonia. In this single-arm, open-label study, we used a cervical percutaneous interferential current stimulation device to activate pharyngeal and laryngeal sensory nerves. We evaluated its effectiveness in patients with Hoehn–Yahr stages 2–4 Parkinson’s disease. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a normal cough reflex after consuming 1% citric acid at the end of the intervention compared with baseline measurements. In total, 25 patients received neck percutaneous interferential current stimulation for 20 min twice weekly for 8 weeks. Afterward, the proportion of patients with a normal cough reflex after 1% citric acid consumption increased significantly (p = 0.001), whereas other indicators, such as tongue pressure, peak expiratory flow, and penetration or aspiration during videofluoroscopic examination, remained unchanged. A longer duration of illness, higher Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale total scores, and higher levodopa equivalent daily doses were significantly associated with improved cough test outcomes. Hence, cervical percutaneous interferential current stimulation significantly improved cough reflexes and may improve silent aspiration. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs062220013, first registered 09/05/2022.

Effects of robot-assisted gait training using the Welwalk on gait independence for individuals with hemiparetic stroke: an assessor-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundGait disorder remains a major challenge for individuals with stroke, affecting their quality of life and increasing the risk of secondary complications. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) has emerged as a promising approach for improving gait independence in individuals with stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of RAGT in individuals with subacute hemiparetic stroke using a one-leg assisted gait robot called Welwalk WW-1000.MethodsAn assessor-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted in the convalescent rehabilitation wards of eight hospitals in Japan. Participants with first-ever hemiparetic stroke who could not walk at pre-intervention assessment were randomized to either the Welwalk group, which underwent RAGT with conventional physical therapy, or the control group, which underwent conventional physical therapy alone. Both groups received 80 min of physical therapy per day, 7 days per week, while the Welwalk group received 40 min of RAGT per day, 6 days per week, as part of their physical therapy. The primary outcome was gait independence, as assessed using the Functional Independence Measure Walk Score.ResultsA total of 91 participants were enrolled, 85 of whom completed the intervention. As a result, 91 participants, as a full analysis set, and 85, as a per-protocol set, were analyzed. The primary outcome, the cumulative incidence of gait-independent events, was not significantly different between the groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that the interaction between the intervention group and stroke type did not yield significant differences in either the full analysis or per-protocol set. However, although not statistically significant, a discernible trend toward improvement with Welwalk was observed in cases of cerebral infarction for the full analysis and per-protocol sets (HR 4.167 [95%CI 0.914–18.995], p = 0.065, HR 4.443 [95%CI 0.973–20.279], p = 0.054, respectively).ConclusionsThe combination of RAGT using Welwalk and conventional physical therapy was not significantly more effective than conventional physical therapy alone in promoting gait independence in individuals with subacute hemiparetic stroke, although a trend toward earlier gait independence was observed in individuals with cerebral infarction.Trial registrationThis study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp; jRCT 042180078) on March 3, 2019.

Treating epidermolytic ichthyosis and ichthyosis with confetti with epidermal autografts cultured from revertantskin.

No efficient treatment has yet been established for epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), which is caused by pathogenic variants of KRT1 or KRT10. Patients with ichthyosis with confetti (IWC) have multiple normal-appearing spots, caused by the revertant somatic recombination of pathogenic variants that occurs at each spot independently. Additionally, some patients with EI have large areas of normal skin due to revertant postzygotic mosaicism. To assess the feasibility of transplanting cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) produced from revertant epidermal keratinocytes in patients with EI and IWC. We performed a clinical trial of treatment with CEAs produced from each patient's own revertant epidermal keratinocytes as a proof-of-concept study. This was a single-arm, open, unmasked, uncontrolled, single-assignment, treatment-purpose study. The primary outcome was the percentage area that lacked recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 4 weeks after the final transplant. The secondary outcome was the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 24 weeks after the initial transplantation. The trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTb041190097). We successfully produced CEAs from genetically confirmed revertant skin from two patients with mosaic EI and from one patient with IWC and confirmed by amplicon sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis that the CEAs mainly consisted of revertant wild-type cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirmed the normal proliferation and safety profiling of CEAs. CEAs were transplanted onto desquamated lesional sites in the patients. Four weeks post-transplantation, the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions in the three patients was 40%, 100% and 100% respectively, although recurrence of ichthyosis lesions was seen at the site of CEA transplantation in all three patients at 24 weeks post-transplantation. CEAs from normal skin have the potential to be a safe and local treatment option for EI and IWC.

Effect of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on the Tongue Dorsum on Reducing Halitosis and the Duration of the Effect: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment that is gaining popularity in modern clinical medicine. However, little is known about the effect of PDT alone on reducing oral halitosis and the duration of the effect. This trial examined the effect of PDT on the tongue dorsum on reducing oral halitosis and the duration of the effect. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Okayama University Hospital (CRB20-015), and it was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs061200060). Twenty-two participants were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group and control group. PDT was performed in the intervention group using red laser emission and methylene blue gel on the middle and posterior area of the tongue dorsum. The concentration of volatile sulfur compounds, bacterial count on the tongue dorsum, probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and simplified oral debris index score were determined before and 1 week after PDT. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the significance of the differences in each parameter between the two groups. We found that the hydrogen sulfide concentration and bacterial count on the tongue dorsum were decreased in the intervention group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. These results indicated that performing only PDT on the tongue dorsum may not contribute to reducing halitosis.

Abstract PO3-19-12: Evaluating the impact of ePRO-based follow-up system (Pink Ribbon Diary) on quality of life and treatment adherence in patients with breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors: a single center, randomized controlled study (JPRO-B)

Abstract Background: Treatment-related toxicities (TRT) may decrease patient’s quality of life (QOL) and may result in a decrease of adherence to the therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), such as palbociclib (PAL) and abemaciclib (ABM) improved patients’ outcomes with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), however, majority of patients who undergo CDK4/6i therapy experience ≥ Grade 2 TRTs, such as hematological abnormalities, gastrointestinal disorders or general fatigue. While prompt management of those TRTs is mandatory to prevent patients from discontinuing the therapy, real-time monitoring of TRTs has been warranted. Recently, efforts have been made to monitor symptoms using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) to detect side effects as early as possible and to provide timely support. However, the efficacy of ePRO in daily clinical practice for those receiving CDK4/6is is still unclear. In addition, the researches in the field of ePRO to date have only focused on drugs administered intravenously in hospitals, where patients’ adherence has no clinical importance. Study design and eligibility criteria: This randomized, open-label, controlled phase 2 trial is designed to assess the efficacy of a new proprietary ePRO system, the Pink Ribbon Diary (PRD), compared with placebo (usual care without the ePRO system) in breast cancer patients with ER+HER2-ABC receiving oral CDK4/6i-based therapy aged ≥ 20 years. All eligible patients who complete training on how to use ePRO system are randomly allocated to either arm A using ePRO system or arm B receiving usual care (1:1). Participants in the arm A are required to record medication taken and physical condition every day for 3 months, and report adverse events using PRO-CTCAETM once a week. Patients in the arm B are also asked to answer to questions concerning adverse events using PRO-CTCAETM at monthly hospital visit for 3 months. All participants are asked to respond to the EORTC QLQ-C30 at their monthly visit and a questionnaire survey on adherence before the study and after completion of the study. Participants in the arm A and healthcare providers, will answer the questionnaire about the feeling of using the PRD. Primary endpoint is the change in global health status/QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 3 months from baseline. Secondary endpoints are RDI (relative dose intensity), other domains of EORTC QLQ-C30, number of days missed medication, PDC (proportion of days covered), survey of medication compliance awareness using MMAS-8 (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), questionnaire on use of PRD, and comparison between two groups of occurrence of adverse events and incidence of missed medication. Study objective: To assess the clinical efficacy of PRD in patients with ER+HER2-ABC undergoing CDK4/6i-based therapy. Statistical methods: For analysis of QOL, the primary endpoint, the differences in global health status/QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) before and after the study will be compared between the two groups using the t-test. Present accrual and target accrual: The study was approved by institutional review board in December 2022, and is open for enrollment. The target sample size is 70. The study is on-going and 22 patients have been accrued to date. Trial registration numbers: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) jRCT1030220626 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/re/reports/detail/30182). Citation Format: Rie Ozeki, Hideo Shimizu, Kotaro Iijima, Misato Okazaki, Junichiro Watanabe, Mitsue Saito. Evaluating the impact of ePRO-based follow-up system (Pink Ribbon Diary) on quality of life and treatment adherence in patients with breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors: a single center, randomized controlled study (JPRO-B) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-19-12.

Large phenotypic diversity by genotype in patients with GNE myopathy: 10years after the establishment of a national registry in Japan.

GNE myopathy is an ultra-rare autosomal recessive distal myopathy caused by pathogenic variants of the GNE gene, which encodes a key enzyme in sialic acid biosynthesis. The present study aimed to examine the long-term progression of GNE myopathy, genotype-phenotype correlations, and complications to provide useful information for predicting patient progression and designing clinical trials using a large collection of registry data over a 10-year period. We analyzed 220 Japanese patients with GNE myopathy from a national registry in Japan. Diagnoses were confirmed by genetic curators based on genetic analysis reports. We analyzed registration sheets and annually updated items completed by attending physicians. In total, 197 of 220 participants (89.5%) carried p.D207V or p.V603L in at least one allele. The median disease duration to loss of ambulation was estimated to be 10 years in p.V603L homozygotes (n = 48), whereas more than 90% of p.D207V/p.V603L compound heterozygotes were estimated to be ambulatory even 20 years after disease onset according to Kaplan-Meier analysis (p < 0.001). Moreover, participants with a younger age of onset lost ambulation earlier regardless of genotype. A decline in respiratory function was observed as the disease progressed, particularly in p.V603L homozygotes, whereas none of the p.D207V/p.V603L compound heterozygotes showed a decline. The present study demonstrated large differences in disease progression and respiratory function between genotypes. Moreover, age of onset was found to be an indicator of disease severity regardless of genotype in GNE myopathy patients. These results may help stratify patients in clinical trials and predict disease progression.

Association between defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval and short-term outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm

AimThe optimal timing of adrenaline administration after defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and an initial shockable rhythm is unknown. We investigated the association between the defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval and clinical outcomes. MethodsBetween 2011 and 2020, we enrolled 1,259,960 patients with OHCA into a nationwide prospective population-based registry in Japan. After applying exclusion criteria, 20,905 patients with an initial shockable rhythm documented at emergency medical services (EMS) arrival who received adrenaline after defibrillation were eligible for this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to predict favourable short-term outcomes: prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 30-day survival, or a favourable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) at 30 days. Patients were categorised into 2-minute defibrillation-to-adrenaline intervals up to 18 min, or more than 18 min. ResultsAt 30 days, 1,618 patients (8%) had a favourable neurological outcome. The defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval in these patients was significantly shorter than in patients with an unfavourable neurological outcome [8 (5–12) vs 11 (7–16) minutes; P < 0.001]. The proportion of patients with prehospital ROSC, 30-day survival, or a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days decreased as the defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval increased (P < 0.001 for trend). Multivariable analysis revealed that a defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval of > 6 min was an independent predictor of worse prehospital ROSC, 30-day survival, or neurological outcome at 30 days when compared with an interval of 4–6 min. ConclusionA longer defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval was significantly associated with worse short-term outcomes in patients with OHCA and an initial shockable rhythm.