Objective: Quality of life (QOL) of children who required treatment in a national neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during the first week of life was determined at 6 years of age.Method:QOL was assessed using a standardized questionnaire employing a multi-attribute scoring system including the functions: hearing, vision, speech, mobility, emotion, learning, self-care and pain. After excludingthose with congenital neurodevelopmental disorders, questionnaire returns were analyzed from 177 children treated in the NICU in 1990 and a comparative age-matched group of 230 children who did not requireneonatal care. Of these, returns were obtained from 143 (81%) cases and 171 (74%) of the non-treated group.Results: There was no difference in overall ability between the two groups, with 95(66%) of cases and 126 (74%) of the comparison group reporting normal scores in all functions. Children treated in the NICU had decreased scores in individual functions including speech (p = 0.04),mobility (p = 0.009) and self-care (p = 0.006). For the study population, males had lower function in speech (p = 0.04) and learning (p = 0.001), with significantly worse functionoverall (p = 0.02) when compared with female cases. When compared with same-gender children who did not require NICU care, overall function was also significantly worse for male but not female cases(p = 0.0002), and this was largely contributed to by impairment in speech (p = 0.03), mobility (p = 0.04), learning abilities (p = 0.02) and self-care (p = 0.03). Eleven(7.7%) cases compared with just two (1.2%) children who were not treated in the NICU required assistance at school (p = 0.009). No difference was observed when QOL was assessed according to gestationalage and birth weight.Conclusion: Using a simple scoring system this study has shown that, for survivors who required early neonatal intensive care, the QOL at 6 years compared favorably withthat of children not treated in the NICU, especially for girls.
Read full abstract