Irinotecan Regimen Research Articles

Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab as a second‐line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

155 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have poor prognoses with limited response to second-line chemotherapy. Therefore, it is urgent to refine and design an optimal second-line treatment regimen to improve the response rate and prolong the survival of patients with mCRC. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of the trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), irinotecan, and bevacizumab regimen in second-line settings for mCRC patients. Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial. The mCRC patients who are refractory to standard first-line treatment, including fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin, are eligible. Based on the recommended phase II dose established in phase I, enrolled patients received TAS-102 (30 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5) and irinotecan (150 mg/m2 on day 1) combined with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1) every two weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Results: Between October 1, 2023, and August 31, 2024, 60 patients were enrolled, and all of them were evaluated for efficacy. As of August 31, 2024, efficacy was assessed in all 60 participants with an ORR of 18.3% (2 had complete response, CR; 9 had partial response, PR; 39 had stable disease, SD). Among the 39 patients with SD, 29 patients experienced tumor shrinkage. The disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%. The median follow-up was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.743-10.457). The six-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 59.6%. The median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.016-8.784), whereas the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The 1-year OS rate was 92%. At the time of analysis, four patients have died, and 56 patients are still alive. All patients were evaluable for safety assessment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were nausea (100%), neutropenia (86.7%), and anemia (83.3%). The most frequent grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (48.3%), febrile neutropenia (8.3%), nausea (3.3%), and anemia (3.3%). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: The regimen of irinotecan, TAS-102, plus bevacizumab preliminarily demonstrated promising efficacy with tolerable toxicity for mCRC patients as second‐line treatment. This regimen warrants further exploration in refractory mCRC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT06202001 .

Effects of tumor treating fields (TTFields) with FOLFIRINOX on BRCA WT pancreatic cancer cells.

753 Background: Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive malignancies, frequently diagnosed at the locally advanced or metastatic stage. In the advanced setting, first-line chemotherapy options include gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX, a combination regimen of fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and leucovorin. The FOLFIRINOX regimen is however associated with greater toxicity and is hence used only in patients with good performance status. BRCA-mutated tumors seem to be more sensitive to FOLFIRINOX due to the DNA-damaging, platinum-based component of this treatment regimen. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt cellular processes crucial for cancer cell viability that have shown efficacy in preclinical pancreatic cancer models; and, in various cancer types, have been shown to reduce expression of proteins from the BRCA-dependent DNA repair pathway. The current study examined the potential use of TTFields for sensitization of BRCA wild-type pancreatic cancer cells to treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Human pancreatic BRCA wild-type cancer cells BxPC3 and AsPC1 were treated with TTFields (150 kHz; 0.7 and 1 V/cm RMS, respectively), using the inovitro device. FOLFIRINOX was administered to the cells at increasing concentrations, with or without co-treatment with TTFields. After 72h of treatment, cell count, colony formation, and apoptosis were measured. For mechanistical insight, gene and protein expression were evaluated following 24, 48, or 72h of TTFields treatment. Results: TTFields application to the pancreatic cells together with FOLFIRINOX elevated the cytotoxic, clonogenic and apoptotic effects induced by FOLFIRINOX or TTFields alone. RNA sequencing data revealed that TTFields downregulated DNA damage repair, DNA replication, and cell cycle related processes. Specifically, real-time PCR and Western blot analysis demonstrated reduced expression of several central players in the BRCA DNA damage repair pathway. Conclusions: TTFields application together with FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer cells lacking background BRCA mutations exhibits potential improvement relative to FOLFIRINOX alone, that may be rationalized based on downregulation of key DNA repair pathways. Future studies should explore the possibility of reducing FOLFIRINOX treatment dose, potentially alleviating FOLFIRINOX-related toxicity.

Alternating Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan Chemotherapy Combined With Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Microsatellite-stable Stage IV Metastatic Colon Cancer With a BRAF V600E Mutation: Two Case Reports Indicating Survival Improvement over Standard Therapy.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third-highest incidence among human cancers. Advancements in chemotherapy and targeted therapy have improved the treatment outcomes for patients with CRC. However, the management of patients with unresectable metastatic CRC (mCRC) continues to be a significant challenge for clinicians worldwide, particularly for those with microsatellite stability (MSS) and the BRAF V600E mutation, as they are associated with the poorest prognosis. The present study describes two patients with unresectable MSS, BRAF V600E-mutated stage IV metastatic CRC using a biweekly alternating regimen of irinotecan and oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine and bevacizumab. Case 1 stabilized after alternating treatment, whereas Case 2 progressed after alternating treatment, with progression-free survival (PFS) of 20+ and 24.5 months, respectively. Circulating levels of carcinoemryonic antigen (CEA) dropped to near normal in both cases. A partial response (PR) was determined for both cases. The two cases suggest that an alternating chemotherapy regimen of oxaliplatin and irinotecan, combined with capecitabine and bevacizumab is effective in the treatment of MSS, BRAF V600E-mutated stage IV metastatic CRC. The progression-free survival was significantly prolonged (both exceeding 20 months) compared to the first-line standard chemotherapy regimen for this disease. With a good balance between toxicity and efficacy, this alternating chemotherapy regimen can be considered as a potential first-line option for microsatellite-stable metastatic colon cancer.

Bi-weekly irinotecan is an effective and convenient regimen in the treatment of relapsed or refractory small cell lung cancer

BackgroundDespite initial dramatic responses, metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) invariably recurs. Irinotecan is one of the active agents for patients with recurrent SCLC. In the second line, weekly or three-weekly irinotecan regimens have been adopted, however, the optimal dose and schedule is not defined. In our institution, we use a bi-weekly regimen of irinotecan. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the bi-weekly irinotecan in the second- or third-line treatment of SCLC patients.MethodsThe study population consisted of advanced stage SCLC patients who were followed at Hacettepe University Cancer Institute between January 2007 and March 2021 and received salvage irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks, following progression after platinum-etoposide treatment.ResultsOne hundred patients were included. At diagnosis, nineteen patients (19%) had limited stage and 81 patients (81%) had extensive stage SCLC. Objective response rates (ORR) were 44.6% and 46.2% for patients who received irinotecan treatment in second line, and in third line, respectively. Seventeen percent of all the patients had grade 3 and above adverse events during irinotecan treatment. In our study, 45.8% of patients were able to complete at least 6 cycles of irinotecan treatment and 69.8% were able to receive at least 3 cycles of irinotecan treatment without any dose interruption or reduction.ConclusionsIrinotecan 180 mg/m2 every two weeks appears to be safe and effective in the 2nd- and 3rd-line treatment of advanced stage SCLC. Bi-weekly administration allows G-CSF prophylaxis in between doses, leading to an uninterrupted administration.

A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional real-world study to assess the effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Mecapegfilgrastim, a long-actinggranulocyte-colony stimulating factor has been approved for reducing the incidence of infection, particularly febrile neutropenia (FN), in China. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study to examine the safety and effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in gastrointestinal patients receiving the chemotherapy, including S-1/capecitabine-based regimens or thefluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) regimens. Five hundred and sixty-one gastrointestinal patients from 40 sites across China, between May 2019 and November 2021, were included. The administration of mecapegfilgrastim was prescribed at the discretion of local physicians. The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of any grade for all patients was increased white blood cells (2.9%). Grade 3/4 ADRs were observed for anemia (0.2%), decreased white blood cells (0.2%), and decreased neutrophil count (0.2%). Among the 116 patients who received S-1/capecitabine-based chemotherapy throughout all cycles, ADRs of any grade included anemia (1.7%), myalgia (0.9%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (0.9%). No grade 3/4 ADRs were observed. In 414 cycles of patients who underwent S-1/capecitabine-based regimens, only one (0.2%) cycle experienced grade 4 neutropenia. In the FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOXIRI, and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in one (2.7%) of 37 cycles, four (4.7%) of 85 cycles, and two (1.2%) of 167 cycles, respectively. In a real-world setting, mecapegfilgrastim has proven effective in preventing severe neutropenia in gastrointestinal patients following chemotherapy. This includes commonly used moderate or high-risk FN regimens or regimens containing S1/capecitabine, all of which have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles.

Phase I study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab as a second-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

This phase I trial is to determine the recommended dose of the TAS-102, irinotecan plus bevacizumab regimen and assess its safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment. A 3 + 3 designed dose escalation was performed. Patients were administered TAS-102 (30-35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5) and irinotecan (150-165 mg/m2 on day 1) combined with a fixed dose of bevacizumab (5mg/kg on day 1) every two weeks. The primary endpoint was the determination of the recommended phase II dose. Eighteen patients were enrolled: 6 at the Level 1 (TAS-102 30 mg/m2 twice daily, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5mg/kg), six at the Level 2 (TAS-102 35 mg/m2 twice daily, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5mg/kg), and six at the Level 3 (TAS-102 30 mg/m2 twice daily, irinotecan 165 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5mg/kg). Five dose-limiting toxicities occurred: one observed at Level 1 (thrombocytopenia), two at Level 2 (neutropenia and diarrhea), and two at Level 3 (fatigue and neutropenia). The RP2D was established as TAS-102 30 mg/m2 twice daily and irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5mg/kg. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33.3%), diarrhea (16.7%), and thrombocytopenia (11.1%). No treatment-related death occurred. Two patients (11.1%) experienced partial responses and 14 (77.8%) had stable disease. The regimen of TAS-102, irinotecan, and bevacizumab is tolerable with antitumor activity for metastatic colorectal cancer patients refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin treatment.

ARC-9: A randomized study to evaluate etrumadenant based treatment combinations in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

3508 Background: Adenosine mediated signaling via A2a and A2b receptors impairs activation, proliferation, and cytotoxic activity of effector T cells resulting in inhibition of antitumor activity. Adenosine receptor blockade may therefore enhance therapeutic efficacy of chemo/immunotherapy regimens. Etrumadenant (E) is an orally bioavailable, selective, A2a and A2b receptor antagonist that has demonstrated safety and clinical activity in solid tumors when combined with chemo/immunotherapy. ARC-9 (NCT04660812), a Phase Ib/II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of E combined with zimberelimab (Z) (anti-PD-1 antibody), and FOLFOX/bevacizumab (bev) regimens or novel therapies in 3 cohorts of patients (pts) with mCRC. While FOLFOX rechallenge is frequently used in the management of mCRC, no prospective trials have been performed to date. Methods: Cohort B enrolled pts who previously progressed on both oxaliplatin and irinotecan containing regimens.Pts were randomized 2:1 to EZFB: E (150 mg orally [PO] once daily [QD]) + Z (240 mg intravenous [IV] once every 2 weeks [Q2W]) + mFOLFOX-6 + bev (5 mg/kg IV Q2W), or regorafenib (rego) (160 mg PO QD [days 1-21 every 4 weeks]). Pts who progressed on rego were allowed to crossover to EZFB. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS) is a key secondary endpoint. Results: In Cohort B, 112 pts were randomized. Baseline characteristics are comparable between arms. As of 13 Nov 2023, with median follow-up of 20.4 months (mo), EZFB demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.63, p = 0.0003) vs rego (Table). EZFB had an acceptable safety profile, consistent with the known FOLFOX/bev toxicity profile with no deaths related to study treatment in either arm. Conclusions: In this randomized phase II clinical trial, EZFBsignificantlyimproved efficacy outcomes compared to rego in refractory mCRC pts previously treated with 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan regimens with no unexpected toxicities. Further investigation of this promising regimen is warranted given the clinically meaningful PFS and OS improvement. Table Clinical trial information: NCT04660812 . [Table: see text]

Panitumumab versus cetuximab in combination with irinotecan in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

There is evidence that adding cetuximab can overcome resistance to irinotecan, but a similar analysis with Panitumumab isn't readily available. This study evaluated the activity of each anti-EGFR plus irinotecan as a salvage third-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This is a retrospective cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed to irinotecan monotherapy and were exposed to an anti-EGFR antibody as a third line of treatment. This study was conducted at a single cancer center in Brazil. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were objective response rate, stratified by primary tumor sidedness, progression-free survival, and toxicity. This analysis included 412 patients who had progressed on irinotecan and were KRAS wild-type. One hundred eighty-two received Irinotecan plus Cetuximab (I + C group) and 230 Irinotecan plus Panitumumab (I + P group). There was no significant difference in median overall survival between treatment groups (9.1 months [I + C] vs 10.1 months [I + P]; p = 0.76). There was also no difference in progression-free survival (3.63 months [I + C] vs 3.73 months [I + P]; p = 0.19) and objective response rate (23.0 % [I + C] vs 22.3 % [I + P]; p = 0.97). Patients with right-sided tumors had worse overall survival than left-sided (6.2 months vs 10.1 months; p = 0.003) but presented a better objective response rate with panitumumab (8.3 % [I + P] vs 3.3 % [I + C]). There were more infusion reactions with cetuximab. Panitumumab and cetuximab have similar activity when combined with irinotecan as treatment for patients with disease progression with an irinotecan regimen, potentially rescuing the irinotecan activity.

Effective re-induction regimen for children with recurrent medulloblastoma.

There is no standard treatment for the recurrence of medulloblastoma, the most common malignant childhood brain tumor, and prognosis remains dismal. In this study, we introduce a regimen that is well-tolerated and effective at inducing remission. The primary objectives of this study were to assess tolerability of the regimen and overall response rate (ORR). A retrospective chart review of patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, treated at two institutions with a re-induction regimen of intravenous irinotecan and cyclophosphamide with oral temozolomide and etoposide, was performed. Demographic, clinicopathologic, toxicity, and response data were collected and analyzed. Nine patients were identified. Median age was 5.75 years. Therapy was well-tolerated with no therapy-limiting toxicities and no toxic deaths. Successful stem cell collection was achieved in all 5 patients in whom it was attempted. ORR after 2 cycles was 78%. Three patients had a complete response, 4 patients had a partial response, 1 patient had stable disease, and 1 patient had progressive disease. Four patients are alive with no evidence of disease (NED), 2 patients are alive with disease, 2 patients have died of disease, and 1 patient died of toxicity related to additional therapy (NED at time of death). This regimen is well-tolerated and effective. Tumor response was noted in the majority of cases, allowing patients to proceed to additional treatment with no or minimal disease. Further study of this regimen in a clinical trial setting is an important next step.

A Phase II Exploratory Study to Identify Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Response to Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Failed First-Line Therapy.

Single-agent regorafenib is approved in Canada for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have failed previous lines of therapy. Identifying prognostic biomarkers is key to optimizing therapeutic strategies for these patients. In this clinical study (NCT01949194), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-agent regorafenib as a second-line therapy for mCRC patients who received it after failing first-line therapy with an oxaliplatin or irinotecan regimen with or without bevacizumab. Using various omics approaches, we also investigated putative biomarkers of response and resistance to regorafenib in metastatic lesions and blood samples in the same cohort. Overall, the safety profile of regorafenib seemed similar to the CORRECT trial, where regorafenib was administered as ≥ 2 lines of therapy. While the mutational landscape showed typical mutation rates for the top five driver genes (APC, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53), KRAS mutations were enriched in intrinsically resistant lesions. Additional exploration of genomic-phenotype associations revealed several biomarker candidates linked to unfavorable prognoses in patients with mCRC using various approaches, including pathway analysis, cfDNA profiling, and copy number analysis. However, further research endeavors are necessary to validate the potential utility of these promising genes in understanding patients' responses to regorafenib treatment.

Comparison of different second line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundIn metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), first line treatment options usually include combination regimens of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX or mFOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine based regimens such as in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel (GEM + nab-PTX). After progression, multiple regimens including NALIRI + 5-FU and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, 5-FU-based oxaliplatin doublets (OFF, FOLFOX, or XELOX), or 5-FU-based monotherapy (FL, capecitabine, or S-1) are considered appropriate by major guidelines. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of different treatment strategies tested as second-line regimens for patients with mPDAC after first-line gemcitabine-based systemic treatment.MethodsRandomized phase II and III clinical trials (RCTs) were included if they were published or presented in English. Trials of interest compared two active systemic treatments as second-line regimens until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We performed a Bayesian NMA with published hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different second-line therapies for mPDAC. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were grade 3–4 toxicities. We calculated the relative ranking of agents for each outcome as their surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). A higher SUCRA score meant a higher ranking for efficacy outcomes.ResultsA NMA of 9 treatments was performed for OS (n = 2521 patients enrolled). Compared with 5-FU + folinic acid both irinotecan or NALIRI + fluoropyrimidines had a trend to better OS (HR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.21–2.75 and HR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.31–1.85). Fluoropyrimidines + folinic acid + oxaliplatin were no better than the combination without oxaliplatin. The analysis of treatment ranking showed that the combination of NALIRI + 5-FU + folinic acid was most likely to yield the highest OS results (SUCRA = 0.7). Furthermore, the NMA results indicated that with the highest SUCRA score (SUCRA = 0.91), NALIRI + 5-FU + folinic acid may be the optimal choice for improved PFS amongst all regimens studied.ConclusionsAccording to the NMA results, NALIRI + 5-FU, and folinic acid may represent the best second-line treatment for improved survival outcomes in mPDAC. Further evidence from prospective trials is needed to determine the best treatment option for this group of patients.

Toripalimab combined with fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) regimen or combined with oxaliplatin and tegafur (SOX) regimen in perioperative treatment of locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJ): An open-label, randomized, phase II study.

e16090 Background: Currently, NCCN guidelines recommend PD-1 inhibitors for the first-line therapy in gastric cancer patients (pts). However, the role of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in the perioperative setting remains unclear. This phase 2 study aimed to evaluate toripalimab plus FOLFIRINOX or SOX as perioperative treatment regimens in pts with locally advanced resectable G/GEJ. Methods: Pts were 1:1 ratio randomized to A or B groups. Pts in A group received four cycles of toripalimab (240mg, D1, q2w) and FOLFIRINOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 65 mg/m², d1; irinotecan, 150 mg/m², d1; leucovorin, 200 mg/m², d1; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m², d1-2, q2w) prior to surgery. Then D2 radical gastrectomy was performed, and another 4 cycles of toripalimab and FOLFIRINOX regimen were given within 2 months after surgery. In B group, chemo was changed to SOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m², d1; S-1, 40-60 mg/m2, d1-14, q3w) and toripalimab (240mg, D1) was administered every 3 weeks. The rest treatments were the same as A group. The primary endpoint was tumor regression grade (TRG, TRG 0-1). Key secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year overall survival (OS) and safty. Results: Up to Jan 28, 2023, 54 eligible pts were enrolled (A 21, B 33) with baseline characteristics as follows: The median (range) age was 67 (23-71) years; 6/54 (11.1%) pts had signet ring cell carcinoma component; 40/54 (74.1%) pts had cT4 tumors and 18/54 (33.3%) had lymph node positive disease. 32/54 (59.3%) pts underwent successful resection. R0 resection rate was 100%. The TRG 0-1 rate was higher but not significant in the B group than in the A group (31.58% vs. 23.08%, P = 0.703). 4 pts (A 2, 15.4%; B 2, 10.5%) had a pCR. 23 (A 8, B 15, 71.9%) pts had tumor downstaged after surgery. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 25/54 (46.3%) pts. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 10/54 (18.5%) pts: 7 with grade 3-4 neutropenia, 2 with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and 1 with grade 3 myelosuppression. No new safety signals were observed and no TRAEs leading to death in either group. Conclusions: Toripalimab plus FOLFIRINOX or SOX regimens is tolerable and effective for pts with locally advanced resectable G/GEJ in the perioperative treatment setting. There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between the two groups. Whether intensive or simplified treatment is more suitable for neoadjuvant therapy needs to be further explored. The low pCR rate in both groups may be due to the small sample size and the pts with more advanced primary tumors. This study is ongoing and more data will be released. Clinical trial information: NCT04908566 . [Table: see text]

A single-center retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of a modified regimen of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) with molecular targeting agents as second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with recurrent or nonresectable colorectal cancer.

As the second-line chemotherapy for stage IV recurrent or nonresectable colorectal cancer, our hospital started a modified treatment regimen comprising of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) [tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1)] plus molecular targeting agents (MTAs), i.e., an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor such as panitumumab (P-mab) or cetuximab (C-mab) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor such as bevacizumab (B-mab) since October 2012. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this modified regimen. This retrospective study included 41 patients with advanced recurrent colorectal cancer at our hospital whom at least 3 courses of chemotherapy were conducted from January 2015 to December 2021. Based on the location of the primary tumor, patients were classified into two group (right-sided group, proximal to the splenic curve, and left-sided, distal to the splenic curve). We assessed archived data on RAS and BRAF status and UGT1A1 polymorphisms and use of the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (B-mab) and the EGFR inhibitors panitumumab (P-mab) and cetuximab (C-mab). In addition, progression-free survival rate (36M-PFS) and the overall survival rate (36M-OS) were calculated. Furthermore, the respective median survival time (MST), the median number of treatment courses; the objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed as well. There were 11 patients (26.8%) in the right-sided group, and 30 patients (73.2%) in the left-sided group. There were 19 patients with RAS wild type (46.3%) (1 in the right sided group and 18 in the left sided group). P-mab was used for 16 of these patients (84.2%), C-mab for 2 (10.5%), and B-mab for 1 (5.3%); the remaining 22 patients (53.7%). Ten patients in the right group and 12 patients in the left group were a mutated type and received B-mab. BRAF testing was performed in 17 patients (41.5%); as more than 50% of patients (58.5%) were included before the assay's introduction. Five patients in the right-sided group and 12 patients in the left-sided group had wild type. There was no mutated type. UGT1A1 polymorphism was tested in 16/41 patients: Eight were wild type (8/41 patients, 19.5%) and 8, mutated type. Regarding the *6/*28 double heterozygous type, there was only 1 patient in the right-sided group and the remaining 7 patients were in the left-sided group. The total number of chemotherapy courses was 299, and the median number, 6.0 (range, 3-20). PFS, OS, and MST were as follows: 36M-PFS (total/Rt/Lt), 6.2%/0.0%/8.5% (MST; 7.6/6.3/8.9 months); and 36M-OS (total/Rt/Lt), 32.1%/0.0%/44.0% (MST; 22.1/18.8/28.6 months). The ORR and CBR were 24.4% and 75.6%, respectively. The majority of AEs were grades 1 or 2 and were improved with conservative treatment. Grade 3 leukopenia was observed in 2 cases (4.9%), neutropenia in 4 cases (9.8%), and malaise/nausea/diarrhea/perforation in 1 case each (2.4%). Grade 3 leukopenia (2 patients) and neutropenia (3 patients) were more commonly observed in the left-sided group. Diarrhea and perforation were also common in the left-sided group. This second-line modified IRIS regimen with MTAs is safe and effective and results in good PFS and OS.

Individualized therapy based on the combination of mini-PDX and NGS for a patient with metastatic AFP-producing and HER-2 amplified gastric cancer.

Mini-patient-derived xenograft (mini-PDX) is a novel, rapid and accurate method used to assess in vivo drug susceptibility. In the present study, a mini-PDX combined with next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to guide the individualized treatment of a patient with metastatic a-fetoprotein-producing and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) amplified gastric cancer (GC). Tumor cells were isolated from the tumor tissue obtained from gastroscopic biopsy, transferred into capsules and implanted into severe combined immunodeficiency mice to determine their sensitivity to various drug regimens. NGS was also performed to assess the mutation spectrum of the cells. The results were analyzed to select the most appropriate treatment regimen for the patient. The mini-PDX model confirmed that the patient's tumor was sensitive to a combination regimen of irinotecan and tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil (S-1). Fluorescence in situ hybridization assay of the tumor tissue confirmed HER-2 amplification. The NGS results indicated ERBB2 amplification, and tumor protein P53 [c.659A>G (p.Y220C)], ataxia-telengiectasia mutated [c.125A>G (p.H42R)] and MutS homolog 6 [c.3254C(8>7) (p.F1088Sfs*2)] mutation, in which UGT1A1*28, TA6/7 (rs8175347) was a mutant heterozygote. After six courses of treatment with a regimen comprising 300 mg irinotecan on day 1 + 40 mg S-1 twice daily on days 2–15 + 350 mg trastuzumab once-every 3 weeks, the patient continued with S-1 treatment for 4 courses and trastuzumab for 1 year. The patient retained progression-free survival status at the 32-month follow-up. Thus, the mini-PDX model combined with the NGS rapidly assessed drug sensitivity in a patient with GC and revealed key genetic mutations. However, the proposed technique requires further research to confirm its potential in the individualized treatment of patients with refractory malignancies.

Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundFive-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) regimen is used as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The use of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine pro-drug, is feasible and safe; hence, it provides an interesting alternative to 5-fluorouracil in the abovementioned regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) regimen use with or without targeted drugs in Chinese patients with mCRC.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with mCRC who received XELOXIRI regimen with or without targeted drugs (bevacizumab or cetuximab) every 2 weeks between January 2017 and November 2019 at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College. Treatment efficacy was assessed by investigators by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. The adverse events were also analyzed.ResultsSixty-one consecutive patients were examined and followed up for survival. As of November 8, 2021, the median follow-up time was 35.4 months. Disease progression and death occurred in 50 (82%) and 38 (62%) patients, respectively. The median treatment duration of XELOXIRI with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab was 10 cycles (range, 1–12 cycles). The median OS and PFS were 32.2 months (95%CI [24.8–39.6]) and 9.3 months (95% CI [8.1–10.5]), respectively. The ORR of 48 patients with measurable lesions was 70.8%, and the DCR was 89.6%. RAS/BRAF wild-type (HR 0.39; 95% CI [0.16–0.96], p = 0.04) and metastatic organs > 2 (HR 3.25; 95% CI [1.34–7.87], p = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The incidence of any grade of adverse events (AEs) was 96.7% (59/61). Grade ≥ 3 AEs included neutropenia (19.7%), leukopenia (9.8%), diarrhea (3.3%), vomiting (3.3%), febrile neutropenia (1.6%), and thrombocytopenia (1.6%). No treatment-related death occurred.ConclusionThe use of the XELOXIRI regimen with or without a targeted drug was effective, with a manageable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with mCRC.

Protocol of OGSG 1901: a phase II trial of ramucirumab plus irinotecan for patients with early relapsed gastric cancer during or after adjuvant docetaxel plus S − 1 therapy

BackgroundAlthough docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy has been a standard of treatment for stage III gastric cancer, there is no established chemotherapy for patients with recurrence during or within six months after the completion of adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy.MethodsThe OGSG 1901 trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial evaluating ramucirumab plus irinotecan for gastric cancer patients with early relapse after adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy. The key eligibility criteria were: 1) histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma 2) patients who were on docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after the confirmation of pathological stage III, 3) patients with early relapse, i.e., recurrence during or within 6 months after the completion of docetaxel plus S-1 therapy, and 4) patient with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2, day 1) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg, day 1) will be administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall response rate, progression-free survival, and safety. The number of patients has been set at 40 based on the threshold and expected median survival times of 7 and 11 months, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.05 and power of 0.80. The enrollment and follow-up periods are 2 and 1.5 years, respectively.DiscussionThe results of this trial will indicate whether the ramucirumab with irinotecan regimen has the potential to be a recommended treatment regimen for patients with recurrence gastric cancer during or within 6 months after the completion of adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs05119071, October 6, 2019).

A phase II, open-label, pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEO-Nal-IRI study.

TPS4196 Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given pre-op. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) is FDA approved in combination with 5-FU/LV with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NALIRIFOX regimen as per the table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in pre-op setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30-day post-op complication rate. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

Present status and perspective of perioperative chemotherapy for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer in Japan.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal carcinoma. Perioperative chemotherapy has been given in less than 50% of patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer in Japan. A modified combination regimen of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 hours every 14 days for 12 cycles) is now preferred worldwide because it mitigates concerns regarding toxicity and tolerance. Adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens employ S-1 in East Asia, whereas other areas use FOLFIRINOX, capecitabine plus gemcitabine, or gemcitabine monotherapy. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not recommended because randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses revealed no survival benefit compared with chemotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy for patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer significantly increased survival compared to upfront surgery in a recent clinical trial. Perioperative outcomes, including R0 resection rate and post-operative morbidity, were not significantly different between groups. When compared to upfront surgery, neoadjuvant S-1 and gemcitabine treatment significantly reduced the number of pathological nodal metastases in patients who underwent resection. Japanese guidelines therefore recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Preoperative chemotherapy can increase R0 cases by down-staging with higher relative dose intensity of chemotherapy. In contrast, patients who do not respond to chemotherapy may miss resection opportunities and would therefore be at a disadvantage. Therefore, it is critical for both patients and doctors that predictive markers for the response to chemotherapy are identified.

A phase II, open-label pilot study evaluating the safety and activity of liposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in preoperative treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEO-Nal-IRI study.

TPS619 Background: Neoadjuvant treatment for potentially curable pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is increasing in acceptability, but a standard regimen has yet to be established. Multiple studies have demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness of the FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) regimen in the perioperative setting. However, FOLFIRINOX often requires dose modifications, delays and growth factor support due to excessive toxicity which can complicate care delivery when given pre-op. Liposomal irinotecan injection (Nal-IRI) in combination with 5FU/LV is FDA approved with a well-tolerated safety profile in relapsed, refractory metastatic PDAC. The current study aims to substitute Nal-IRI for traditional irinotecan in the standard FOLFIRINOX regimen (NALIRIFOX) and to demonstrate safe and effective neoadjuvant delivery. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, multicenter single-arm study focuses on patients (pts) with operable PDAC without metastatic disease. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, resectability confirmed by multiD GI tumor board (resectable vs. borderline), adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Pts receive NALIRIFOX regimen as per the table every 2 weeks for four months followed by disease reassessment. Pts who remain surgical candidates will undergo surgical resection within 4 to 8 weeks following last dose of therapy. The primary endpoint is to assess safety and feasibility of regimen in pre-op setting. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, clinical, biochemical and radiological response rate and patient-reported quality of life during treatment as measured by the NCI validated FACT-G scale. Exploratory ctDNA and stool microbiome analyses are also planned. Enrollment continues to a maximum of 28 evaluable pts to demonstrate a reduction in historical 30-day post-op complication rate. Clinical trial information: NCT03483038. [Table: see text]

Ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Final analysis of a phase II trial.

284 Background: Ramucirumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting VEGFR2, is used for treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after disease progression on first-line chemotherapy. Superior survival outcome is expected when combined with paclitaxel. However, many patients suffer from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy after oxaliplatin-containing first-line treatment and are unable to tolerate paclitaxel. Irinotecan has shown survival benefit as a single agent or in combination with other agents for treating gastroesophageal cancer, but has not been evaluated with ramucirumab. We hypothesized that the combination regimen of irinotecan and ramucirumab administered as second-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma will be better tolerated than ramucirumab and paclitaxel with similar clinical efficacy. Methods: The primary objective of this multi-institutional, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial is to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) after disease progression on up to one line of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Secondary objectives include objective response rate, overall survival, time to progression, and clinical benefit; and to evaluate toxicity and tolerability. Patient-derived xenograft and organoid models generated in a subgroup of patients. Investigation of blood-based angiome profiling and cell-free DNA are planned. Patients received 8 mg/kg ramucirumab with 180 mg/m2 irinotecan IV every 14 days. A sample of 40 achieves 85.7% power at a one-sided significance level of 5% to detect a median PFS of 4 months compared to historic control of 2.5 months assuming the accrual time of 12 months and additional follow-up of 12 months and using a one-sample log rank test. NCT03141034. Results: Forty patients were enrolled from four institutions from December 2017 through May 2021. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy prior to enrollment, 8 patients had HER2 positive disease, and 6 patients had received an immune checkpoint inhibitor. As of September 2021, median follow up time was 7.7 months. Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI 2.7 – 5.4). Of 31 patients evaluable for response, 9 patients (29%) had objective responses (1 complete response, 8 partial responses) and 5 patients (16%) had stable disease greater than 6 months. Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and neutropenia were common adverse events; no G3/4 neuropathy was reported. Patient-derived organoid and xenograft models were generated from 9 patient samples, treated in vitro to correlate with each patient’s disease response. Conclusions: Ramucirumab and irinotecan appears to be effective and well-tolerated in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. This regimen is now part of standard guidelines and could be a preferred option for patients after disease progression on first-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03141034.