AT the evening meeting of the Royal Institution on Friday, April 24, Dr. G. V. Poore gave a discourse on the circulation of organic matter. Without attempting to define “organic matter,” Dr. Poore began by saying that all organic matter was combustible, and that all our combustibles were of organic origin. A comparison was made between combustion in a furnace and the combustion of food in the body of an animal, and it was shown that whereas in the furnace the fuel was used up and furnace wore out, in the animal there was increase of size, while its droppings stimulate the soil to an increased production of food. This apparent increase was probably due to the holding in suspension by the extra growth of plants of both water and soluble salts, which otherwise would percolate the soil. and find their way to the sea. Recent experiments made it certain, also, that some of the atmospheric nitrogen was appropriated by microbes in the soil. The animal was a true regenerative furnace, and led to the increase of the herbage at the expense of the sea on the one hand, and the atmosphere on the other. It was impossible to imagine an increase in one direction without some compensating decrease in another direction. When organic matter collected under water, fermentations were set up, and the organic matter was reduced instead of being oxidised. The tendency of organic matter, when thus treated, to form combustible bodies was very remarkable. The inflammable gases which sometimes formed in cesspools, and the marsh gas evolved by mud in ponds and rivers, were familiar examples, as were also the alcohols formed by the fermentation of carbohydrates. Our immense stores of coal and peat were due to the silting up of marsh plants in past ages and in recent times, and so-called mineral oils were certainly of organic origin, as were also the nitrates which were so much used in the manufacture of explosives. If we were to judge what has been by what is, it was impossible not to come to the conclusion that life must have preceded combustion in this world. This biological theory of the cosmogony made the world subject, like all other things, to the processes of development, evolution and decay, and he believed, that such a theory had fewer drawbacks than might at first sight appear.
Read full abstract