Relapsed/refractory Multiple Myeloma Research Articles

Bispecific antibodies as bridging to BCMA CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Establishing a strategy for sequencing of T cell redirecting therapies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is a pressing clinical need. We longitudinally tracked the clinical and immunological impact of bispecific T cell engaging antibodies (BsAb) as bridging therapy (BT) to subsequent BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapies in 52 RRMM patients. BsAbs were a potent and safe option for BT, achieving the highest overall response rate (100%) to BT compared to chemotherapy, anti-CD38 or anti-SLAMF7 antibody based regimens (46%). We observed early CD4+CAR+ and delayed CD8+CAR+ T cell expansion in patients receiving BsAb as BT. In vitro cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells was comparable amongst BT options. Single-cell analyses revealed increased clonality in the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell compartments in patients with previous exposure to BsAbs at leukapheresis and on day 30 after CAR-T infusion. This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of BT with BsAbs for CAR-T cell therapy in RRMM.

Safety and efficacy of standard-of-care ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

AbstractCiltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy was approved in 2022 for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report outcomes with cilta-cel in the standard-of-care setting. Patients with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis for cilta-cel manufacturing between 1 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 at 16 US academic medical centers were included. In terms of results, 255 patients underwent leukapheresis and 236 (92.5%) received cilta-cel. Of patients who underwent leukapheresis, 56% would not have met the CARTITUDE-1 trial eligibility criteria. Manufacturing failure rates at first attempt and overall were 6% and 1%, respectively. The median of prior lines of therapy was 6. In treated patients (n = 236), cytokine release syndrome was seen in 75% (grade ≥3, 5%), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 14% (grade ≥3, 4%), and delayed neurotoxicity in 10%. Best overall and complete response or better rates were as follows: for patients who received infusion (n = 236), 89% and 70%; patients receiving conforming CAR T-cell product (n = 191), 94% and 74%; and conforming CAR T-cell product with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion (n = 152), 95% and 76%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality was 10%, most commonly from infection. After a median follow-up of 13 months from CAR T-cell therapy, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, with the 12-month estimate being 68% (95% confidence interval, 62-74). High ferritin levels, high-risk cytogenetics, and extramedullary disease were independently associated with inferior PFS, with a signal for prior B-cell maturation antigen–targeted therapy (P = .08). Second primary malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers were seen in 5.5% and myeloid malignancies/acute leukemia in 1.7%. We observed a favorable efficacy profile of standard-of-care cilta-cel in RRMM, despite more than half the patients not meeting the CARTITUDE-1 eligibility criteria.

B-Cell Maturation Antigen-Directed Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Clinical Practice.

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, dosing and administration, and relevance to patient care and clinical practice of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAb), for the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A literature review of PubMed (1966 to July 2024) was conducted using the keywords idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel, teclistamab, elranatamab, and multiple myeloma. Data was also obtained from unpublished meeting abstracts and prescribing information. All relevant published articles, unpublished abstracts, and prescribing information on anti-BCMA immunotherapies for the treatment of RRMM were reviewed. Idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel are BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapies that have been compared to standard of care (SOC) regimens for MM in early relapse in the phase III trials KarMMa-3 and CARTITUDE-4, respectively. Both studies demonstrated a significantly improved in response rates, depth of response, and progression-free survival compared to SOC. BsAbs teclistamab and elranatamab have been evaluated in the phase II trials MajesTEC-1 and MagnetisMM-3, respectively. Overall response rates of 63 and 61% were observed with teclistamab and elranatamab, respectively, in a population of patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. BCMA-directed immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of RRMM. Safety issues with BCMA-directed immunotherapies include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, infections, and cytopenias. Operational challenges and issues with access to care exist with these therapies as they may be limited to institutions with the infrastructure to safely administer and monitor patients for toxicities. BCMA-directed immunotherapies represent an important advancement in the management of RRMM and have significantly added to the available treatment options for this disease.

Clinical Efficacy of Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Isatuximab, a novel anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Because of its recent introduction, real-world efficacy and safety are poorly reported. In this Italian multicenter real-life observational retrospective study, efficacy and safety of the Isa-Kd regimen were evaluated in a cohort of 103 RRMM patients. Overall response rate (ORR) was 85%, with stringent (sCR) or complete response (CR) in 18% of cases and very good partial response (VGPR) in 39%. Median PFS and OS were not reached within the study period, while 1-year PFS and OS were 72% and 77%, respectively. Hematological toxicities were observed in 42% of subjects, and cardiac toxicities occurred in 24% of cases. Moreover, we conducted a subanalysis on patients (N = 69) treated with Isa-Kd after one prior line of therapy, showing an ORR of 88%, with sCR + CR in 20% of subjects, VGPR in 46%, and PR in 22% of patients. In this group, median PFS and OS were not reached, while 1-year PFS and OS were 92% and 95%, respectively. In conclusions, our study confirmed Isa-Kd as an effective treatment option for RRMM with a manageable safety profile even in real-life settings.

BCMA-Directed MRD Detection as a Predictor of Relapse after BCMA CAR T in Multiple Myeloma

Background: Recent approvals of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR T) and bispecific antibody therapies offer new hope for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients, with superior efficacy over standard regimens observed in clinical trials. However, relapse after BCMA-directed therapy is common and requires further investigation. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 57 RRMM patients treated with BCMA-directed CAR T. Only the patients who had an initial response and lost BCMA-expressing identified PC following CAR T infusion at Day 30 were included in the analysis. Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) to detect BCMA + plasma cell (PC) re-emergence was performed on bone marrow samples at defined intervals and clinical responses were assessed using International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: The majority of patients achieved undetectable BCMA on MFC post-infusion, with subsequent BCMA+ PC re-emergence observed in 55% of cases. Notably, 91% of patients experiencing clinical relapse showed BCMA+ PC re-emergence, often preceding relapse. Early relapse (<6 months) was associated with earlier BCMA re-emergence. Conclusion: Early BCMA+ PC re-emergence may serve as a prognostic marker for clinical relapse post-BCMA CAR T therapy. Monitoring BCMA+ PC levels via MFC offers potential for early relapse detection and informed treatment decisions. Further studies, including novel BCMA-directed minimal residual disease (MRD) detection technologies, are warranted to validate these findings and refine RRMM management strategies.

EASIX-guided risk stratification for complications and outcome after CAR T-cell therapy with ide-cel in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated significant benefits in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, these outcomes can be compromised by severe complications, including cytokine release...

The Real-World Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone.

Introduction: A combination of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EPd) was approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) following the ELOQUENT-3 phase II clinical trial. However, the clinical experience with this therapy is still limited. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of EPd in a real-world cohort of RRMM patients. Patients and Methods: The medical records of 22 patients who received EPd for RRMM at Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital (Japan) between January 2020 and July 2021 were reviewed. Results: The median age of our cohort was 73.5 years. The overall response rate was 55%. With a median follow-up of 20.2 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-23.0 months). The median PFS was shorter in patients with a poor performance status (PS) than in those with favorable PS (2.5 vs. 10.8 months; p < 0.01). Patients with prior daratumumab had significantly shorter PFS than those without prior daratumumab (2.1 vs. 23.0 months; p < 0.01). Additionally, patients with prior pomalidomide had significantly shorter PFS (1.7 vs. 10.3 months; p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, poor PS (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-15.6; p = 0.04) and prior exposure to daratumumab (HR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.1-13.8; p = 0.04) remained significantly associated with shorter PFS. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that EPd is an active and well-tolerated regimen in RRMM, even in real-world patients. Furthermore, EPd may be useful, especially in daratumumab-naïve patients.

LocoMMotion: a study of real-life current standards of care in triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma - 2-year follow-up (final analysis).

Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is challenging as patients exhaust all available therapies and the disease becomes refractory to standard drug classes. Here we report the final results of LocoMMotion, the first prospective study of real-world clinical practice (RWCP) in triple-class exposed (TCE) patients with RRMM, with a median follow-up of 26.4 months (range, 0.1-35.0). Patients (N = 248) had received median 4 prior LOT (range, 2-13) at enrollment. 91 unique regimens were used in index LOT. Overall response rate was 31.9% (95% CI, 26.1-38.0), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-5.6) and median overall survival was 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.8-17.0). 152 patients (61.3%) had subsequent LOTs with 134 unique regimens, of which 78 were used in first subsequent LOT. Median PFS2 (from start of study through first subsequent LOT) was 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.4-13.0). 158 patients died on study, 67.7% due to progressive disease. Additional subgroup analyses and long-term safety summaries are reported. The high number of RWCP treatment regimens utilized and poor clinical outcomes confirm a lack of standardized treatment for TCE patients with RRMM, highlighting the need for new treatments with novel mechanisms.

A CD38/CD3xCD28 trispecific T‐cell engager as a potentially active agent in multiple myeloma patients relapsed and/or refractory to anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibodies

SummaryThere is accumulating evidence of BCMA and GPRC5D loss after treatment with T‐cell redirecting therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). While complete CD38 loss is not observed upon relapses after treatment with anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), there is downregulation of surface CD38 expression and decreased number and function of NK cells, which renders these patients resistant to retreatment with anti‐CD38 mAb. Here, we provide preclinical evidence that RRMM patients previously exposed to anti‐CD38 mAb could benefit from T‐cell‐based immunotherapy that depend less on CD38 antigen density and NK‐cell activity, such as the novel CD38/CD3xCD28 trispecific T‐cell engager, SAR442257.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone and vs belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Objective Talquetamab is the first GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone (sel-dex) and vs belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) in patients with TCE RRMM. Methods An unanchored MAIC was performed using individual patient-level data from patients treated with subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW) and 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W) from MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799/NCT04636552) and published summary data for sel-dex from STORM (NCT02336815) and belamaf from DREAMM-2 (NCT0325678). Patients from MonumenTAL-1 who met key eligibility criteria for STORM and DREAMM-2 were included. Outcomes of interest were overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results After adjustment for cross-trial differences, patients treated with both dosing schedules of talquetamab showed significantly better ORR, ≥CR, and DOR vs sel-dex and significantly higher ORR and ≥ CR vs belamaf; DOR was relatively similar to belamaf. PFS was significantly improved with talquetamab Q2W and numerically in favor of talquetamab QW vs sel-dex and significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. OS was significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs sel-dex and was numerically in favor of both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. Conclusion These analyses show superior effectiveness of both talquetamab dosing schedules vs sel-dex and vs belamaf for most outcomes and highlight talquetamab as an effective treatment option for patients with TCE RRMM.

Addition of Elotuzumab to Backbone Treatment Regimens for Multiple Myeloma: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BackgroundThe efficacy of elotuzumab, an anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, in treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) has varied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Moreover, there is limited data on its real-world application. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs investigating the addition of elotuzumab to backbone antimyeloma regimens. The primary outcome of interest was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary efficacy outcomes included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and rates of very good partial response or better (VGPR). Key toxicities were also evaluated. ResultsThree RRMM trials (n = 915) and 5 NDMM trials (n = 1790) were included, with 50% of the 2705 patients receiving elotuzumab-containing triplets or quadruplets. In RRMM settings, elotuzumab use significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.82; P < .001; I² = 0%). This benefit was consistent among patients with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90; P = .01; I² = 0%) and was particularly evident in those previously treated with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The RRMM cohort also demonstrated better OS, ORR, and ≥VGPR rate. However, the NDMM cohort showed no significant improvements in any efficacy outcomes. Despite an increase in severe (grade ≥3) infections, elotuzumab use did not adversely affect rates of severe cytopenias, severe cardiac disorders, or second primary malignancies. ConclusionOur results suggest that elotuzumab-containing regimens represent valuable therapeutic options for PI/IMiD-exposed patients with RRMM. In contrast, elotuzumab's role in frontline settings remains limited.

Phase 1b study of the anti-CD38 antibody mezagitamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

AbstractThis phase 1b trial aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of mezagitamab, a subcutaneously administered anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Eligible patients had received ≥3 prior lines of treatment, including an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and a steroid, or ≥2 prior lines in which 1 included a PI + IMiD, and were refractory or intolerant to ≥1 IMiD and ≥1 PI. Fifty patients were enrolled: 44 received mezagitamab monotherapy (dose-escalating cohorts at 45-1200 mg) and 6 received mezagitamab 300 mg in combination with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone. Patients received mezagitamab weekly for 8 doses, every other week for 8 doses, and monthly thereafter. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported with single-agent mezagitamab, and the recommended phase 2 dose was determined as 600 mg. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue in the monotherapy cohort (9/44 patients) and neutropenia in the combination cohort (4/6 patients); neutropenia was the only drug-related grade ≥3 TEAE to occur in >1 patient. No infusion reactions occurred, and 4 injection-site reactions were reported. Three patients discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Among the 22 patients receiving 600 mg mezagitamab, the overall response rate was 47%, and the median duration of response was 22.1 months. Mezagitamab had a manageable safety profile and activity in patients with RRMM, with comparable outcomes to those reported with other anti-CD38 therapies in patients with advanced RRMM. Further development of mezagitamab in myeloma is not planned, but given its encouraging safety, studies are underway in autoimmune conditions with underlying abnormal autoantibodies. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03439280.

Efficacy of CARVYKTI in CARTITUDE-4 versus other conventional treatment regimens for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Aim: The phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) demonstrated superiority of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) over daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) and pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have received one to three prior line(s) of therapy (LOT[s]) including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and are refractory to lenalidomide. These analyses estimate the relative efficacy between cilta-cel and other common treatment regimens, for which no direct comparative evidence is available. Materials & methods: Patient data were available from the CARTITUDE-4, CASTOR, CANDOR and APOLLO RCTs. Imbalances between cohorts on key patient characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Relative efficacies were estimated with response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better rate (≥VGPR) and complete response or better rate (≥CR), and with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analyses using different analytical methods and additional covariates were explored. Results: Key characteristics were well balanced across cohorts after IPTW. Cilta-cel showed statistically significant benefit in PFS (HRs: 0.11-0.51), ≥VGPR (RRs: 1.51-5.13) and ≥CR (RRs: 2.90-35.24) versus all comparators, and statistically significant improvements in ORR over most comparator regimens (RRs: 1.22-1.90). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Cilta-cel demonstrated benefit over other common treatment regimens, highlighting its potential to become a new standard of care option for lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients with one to three prior LOT(s). These comparisons help to demonstrate the improved efficacy of cilta-cel in countries where the standard of care may differ from DPd/PVd.

Ide-cel vs standard regimens in triple-class–exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated KarMMa-3 analyses

AbstractOutcomes are poor in triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.

Safety and efficacy of B cell maturation antigen-directed CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and concurrent light chain amyloidosis.

Clinical trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have typically excluded patients with AL amyloidosis. As a result, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in this patient population. We retrospectively reviewed eight consecutive patients with RRMM and AL amyloidosis who were treated with standard of care CAR T-cell therapy. Cytokine release syndrome was seen in 75% of patients (grade ≥3: 0%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade 1) in only one patient. Low-grade cytopenias were common (any grade/grade ≥3: neutropenia 62.5%/37.5%, anemia 37.5%/0%, thrombocytopenia 25%/0%). CAR T-cell therapy led to rapid and deep responses with a median time to best response of 43 days and a hematologic very good partial response or better rate of 62.5%. Overall, we found that commercial CAR T-cell therapy was feasible, and effective in patients with RRMM and concurrent AL amyloidosis.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Results From the Phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 Study of Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Results From the Phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 Study of Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Efficacy of ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone regimen in daratumumab-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective analysis.

We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), p = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) p = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), p = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR).

MM-328 Efficacy and Safety of Teclistamab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) With High-Risk (HR) Features: a Subgroup Analysis From the Phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 Study

MM-328 Efficacy and Safety of Teclistamab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) With High-Risk (HR) Features: a Subgroup Analysis From the Phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 Study

IMMagine-3: A Phase 3, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Anitocabtagene Autoleucel (Anito-Cel) With Standard of Care in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

iMMagine-3: A Phase 3, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Anitocabtagene Autoleucel (Anito-Cel) With Standard of Care in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

MM-344 Longer-Term Follow-up of Patients Receiving Prophylactic Tocilizumab for the Reduction of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in the Phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 Study of Teclistamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

MM-344 Longer-Term Follow-up of Patients Receiving Prophylactic Tocilizumab for the Reduction of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in the Phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 Study of Teclistamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)