Refractory Lymphoma Research Articles

Evaluation of the cardiac safety of parsaclisib, a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in patients with previously treated B-cell malignancies: Results from the CITADEL-101 study.

Parsaclisib, a potent and selective phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase δ inhibitor, has been investigated for the treatment of B-cell malignancies and studied in patients with autoimmune diseases and myelofibrosis. The CITADEL-101 study (NCT02018861) assessed safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of parsaclisib in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study evaluated the cardiac safety of parsaclisib as monotherapy based on data from 72 patients enrolled in the CITADEL-101 study. Time-matched pharmacokinetic and ECG measurements were collected at specified times for 69 patients receiving monotherapy in doses of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 mg once daily. Based on the categorical outlier analysis, no dose-dependent effect was observed on the incidence of outliers in QT interval corrected for heart rate (HR) by Fridericia's method (QTcF), HR, or cardiac conduction. Based on central tendency analysis, the least square means (LSMs) (90% confidence interval [CI]) of ΔQTcF from the central tendency analysis ranged from -6.83 (-18.8 to 5.19) to 4.75 ms (0.410-9.09) across dose groups (below 20 ms, the threshold of large QT effects) and was not considered dose dependent. Moreover, the LSMs of ΔHR, ΔPR interval, and ΔQRS interval were minor. From the concentration-ΔQTcF analyses, the predicted ΔQTcF (90% CI) for all dose levels was between 0.365 (-1.75 to 2.48) and 7.87 ms (0.921-14.8), with the highest upper limit of CIs well below 20 ms, and therefore, a large QT/QTc effect was ruled out up to the highest dose level (45 mg) investigated. Overall, parsaclisib at the dose ranges studied did not reveal concentration-dependent effects on change in QTcF and did not have a significant effect on HR or cardiac conduction.

Poor outcomes for trial-ineligible patients receiving polatuzumab for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in routine care: An Australian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry project.

Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) is an approved therapy in combination with rituximab and bendamustine for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL) based on positive results of the landmark phase II randomised G029365 trial. However, trial results for many approved novel therapies in RR-DLBCL have not been replicated in routine care cohorts, as RR-DLBCL patient populations are heterogeneous and trial eligibility is increasingly restrictive. We evaluated outcomes from pola±bendamustine and rituximab in patients with RR-DLBCL enrolled in a compassionate access program with no alternative treatment options identified via the Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry according to their eligibility for the original phase II published study. Of 58 eligible patients, 74% met the criteria deeming them ineligible for the G029365 original study at the time of pola's commencement. Median progression-free survival and overall survival in our cohort were 2.3 and 3.5 months, respectively. In contrast to the landmark trial cohort, more of our patients ceased therapy prior to completion, the majority due to progressive disease and only 8/58 received any subsequent treatment. Dismal outcomes in this Australian real-world population demonstrate trial eligibility is challenging to meet, and newer treatments can be difficult to deliver in routine care. Clinically applicable results from therapeutic studies require trial cohorts to reflect representative clinical populations wherever possible, and more research is required to address the benefit of novel agents in the increasing majority who are ineligible for modern studies.

Glofitamab (Columvi)


 CADTH recommends that Columvi be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma (trFL), or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), who have received 2 or more lines of systemic therapy and are ineligible to receive or cannot receive CAR-T cell therapy or have previously received CAR-T cell therapy if certain conditions are met.
 Columvi should only be covered to treat adult patients who have DLBCL not otherwise specified, trFL, or PMBCL that has come back or that did not respond to 2 or more previous treatments for their cancer, and who have also previously received CAR-T cell therapy, declined CAR-T cell therapy, or cannot receive CAR-T cell therapy.
 Columvi should only be reimbursed for a maximum of 12 treatment cycles, after a single dose of obinutuzumab to reduce the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and should not be given in combination with other anticancer drugs. Reimbursement of Columvi should be discontinued if a patient’s cancer grows or spreads or if treatment is unacceptably toxic to the patient. Columvi should only be reimbursed when prescribed by specialists with experience managing DLBCL, and if its cost is reduced.

A306 A CASE OF SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS AS A COMPLICATION OF CAR-T THERAPY

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a novel immunotherapy for treating hematological malignancies. CAR-T therapy starts with the collection of T-cells from patients. Then, receptors on the T-cell membrane are re-engineered to become chimeric antigen receptors that specifically target antigens on the surface of malignant cells. These engineered cells are grown ex vivo and infused back into the patient, leading to a targeted immune response against cancer. While CAR-T therapy has shown promising results in treating malignancies refractory to conventional treatment, there have also been reports of complications from unwanted off-target effects with CAR-T therapy. Aims We report a case of sclerosing cholangitis secondary to CAR-T therapy for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Methods Case report. Results A 67-year-old male with refractory stage IVB mantle cell lymphoma underwent CAR-T therapy. His lymphoma was first diagnosed in 2011 and previous treatment included R-CHOP followed by autologous stem cell transplant. He had disease progression despite rituximab maintenance therapy and was switched to ibrutinib therapy with good response until 2023. In 2023, he was noted to have progression of his lymphoma. He subsequently underwent CAR-T therapy. His treatment was complicated by grade 2 cytokine release syndrome requiring two doses of tocilizumab. Other complications included immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome leading to status epilepticus. He was intubated and required monitoring in the ICU however he was not in shock, nor did he require vasopressors. Post-CAR-T therapy he developed an increase of his liver enzymes in a cholestatic pattern. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) showed irregular biliary dilation with beading suggestive of sclerosing cholangiopathy. He subsequently underwent multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stent insertions but there were no improvements in his liver enzymes and jaundice. A liver biopsy was performed which showed large bile duct obstruction with extensive cholestasis and some evidence of non-caseating granulomatous inflammation. Given the timing of new sclerosing cholangiopathy post-CAR-T therapy along with multiple other complications related to CAR-T therapy, it was thought this patient developed sclerosing cholangitis secondary to CAR-T therapy. Due to worsening clinical status along with progression of mantle cell lymphoma, he was transitioned to comfort care. Conclusions CAR-T therapy is a novel immunotherapy for the treatment of refractory hematological malignancies. However, complications from the off-target effects of CAR-T therapy can occur. This case highlighted a rare side effect associated with CAR-T therapy. In the future, more research will be needed to further characterize the risks associated with CAR-T therapy. Cholangiogram showing no visible filling defects or obstructive lesion. Funding Agencies None

Evaluation of second-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.

Second-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, are preferred agents for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) over first-generation BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib. The comparative safety and efficacy of these two agents have not been studied. Currently, the decision between using one second-generation BTK inhibitor over the other is largely dependent on provider preference, cost, organ dysfunction, presence of drug-drug interactions, adherence considerations, and theorized differences in safety outcomes due to the lack of head-to-head trials in MCL. This retrospective, observational study seeks to provide real-world data on the safety and efficacy of second-generation BTK inhibitors in the setting of relapsed and/or refractory MCL. Thirty-eight patients treated with a second-generation BTK inhibitor were evaluated. Ten percent of patients experienced a select adverse drug event (ADE) in the acalabrutinib group that included hypertension and major hemorrhage with no patients experiencing a select ADE in the zanubrutinib group. Results support historical data that acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib have a more favorable safety profile compared to ibrutinib in MCL.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy after COVID-19 in refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma

Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies have dramatically improved the outcomes of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, recipients suffer from severe humoral immunodeficiencies. Furthermore, patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a poor prognosis, as noted in several case reports of recipients who had COVID-19 before the infusion. We report the case of a 70-year-old woman who developed COVID-19 immediately before CAR-T therapy for high-grade B-cell lymphoma. She received Tixagevimab−Cilgavimab chemotherapy and radiation therapy but never achieved remission. She was transferred to our hospital for CAR-T therapy, but developed COVID-19. Her symptoms were mild and she was treated with long-term molnupiravir. On day 28 post-infection, lymphodepleting chemotherapy was restarted after a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was confirmed. The patient did not experience recurrence of COVID-19 symptoms or severe cytokine release syndrome. Based on the analysis and comparison of the previous reports with this case, we believe that CAR-T therapy should be postponed until a negative PCR test is confirmed. In addition, Tixagevimab−Cilgavimab and long term direct-acting antiviral agent treatment can be effective prophylaxis for severe COVID-19 and shortening the duration of infection.

Clinical and Real-World Effectiveness of Mogamulizumab: A Narrative Review.

Mogamulizumab (MOG) is an antibody targeting the CCR4 receptor, authorized for relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Its adoption in guidelines and endorsement by FDA and EMA established it as a systemic treatment, especially for advanced disease stages due to its comparatively lower toxicity. Clinical trials and real-world evidence have underscored its efficacy in advanced CTCLs, including mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome; PTCLs; and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), showcasing positive outcomes. Notably, the drug has demonstrated significant response rates, disease stability, and extended periods of progression-free survival, suggesting its applicability in cases with multiple treatment lines. Its safety profile is generally manageable, with adverse events (AEs) primarily related to the skin, infusion-related reactions, drug eruptions, autoimmune diseases, and skin disorders. The latter seem to appear as CCR4 can promote the skin-specific homing of lymphocytes, and MOG is directed against this receptor. While combination with immunostimulatory agents like interferon alpha and interleukin 12 has shown promising results, caution is urged when combining with PD1 inhibitors due to the heightened risk of immune-mediated AEs. The introduction of MOG as a systemic treatment implies a significant advancement in managing these diseases, supported by its favorable safety profile and complementary mechanisms.

ADCT-602, a Novel PBD Dimer-containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate for Treating CD22-positive Hematologic Malignancies.

Relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) and lymphomas have poor patient outcomes; novel therapies are needed. CD22 is an attractive target for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), being highly expressed in R/R B-ALL with rapid internalization kinetics. ADCT-602 is a novel CD22-targeting ADC, consisting of humanized mAb hLL2-C220, site specifically conjugated to the pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer-based payload tesirine. In preclinical studies, ADCT-602 demonstrated potent, specific cytotoxicity in CD22-positive lymphomas and leukemias. ADCT-602 was specifically bound, internalized, and trafficked to lysosomes in CD22-positive tumor cells; after cytotoxin release, DNA interstrand crosslink formation persisted for 48 hours. In the presence of CD22-positive tumor cells, ADCT-602 caused bystander killing of CD22-negative tumor cells. A single ADCT-602 dose led to potent, dose-dependent, in vivo antitumor activity in subcutaneous and disseminated human lymphoma/leukemia models. Pharmacokinetic analyses (rat and cynomolgus monkey) showed excellent stability and tolerability of ADCT-602. Cynomolgus monkey B cells were efficiently depleted from circulation after one dose. Gene signature association analysis revealed IRAK1 as a potential marker for ADCT-602 resistance. Combining ADCT-602 + pacritinib was beneficial in ADCT-602-resistant cells. Chidamide increased CD22 expression on B-cell tumor surfaces, increasing ADCT-602 activity. These data support clinical testing of ADCT-602 in R/R B-ALL (NCT03698552) and CD22-positive hematologic cancers.

Treatment Outcomes with Standard of Care in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Real-World Data Analysis.

Despite new therapies for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatments with chemotherapy, single-agent rituximab/obinutuzumab, single-agent lenalidomide, or combinations of these agents continue to be commonly used. This retrospective study utilized longitudinal data from 4226 real-world electronic health records to characterize outcomes in patients with R/R DLBCL. Eligible patients were diagnosed with DLBCL between January 2010 and March 2022 and had R/R disease treated with ≥ 1 prior systemic line of therapy (LOT), including ≥ 1 anti-CD20-containing regimen. A total of 573 patients treated with ≥ 1 prior LOT were included (31.2% and 13.4% with ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 prior LOTs, respectively). Median duration of follow-up was 7.7months. Most patients (57.1%) were male; mean standard deviation (SD) age was 63 (14.7) years. Overall and complete response rates (95% confidence interval (CI) were 52% (48-56) and 23% (19-27). Median duration of response and duration of complete response were 3.5 and 18.4months. Median progression-free and overall survival (95% CI) was 3.0 (2.8-3.3) and 12.9 (10.1-16.9) months, respectively. Patients with a higher number of prior LOTs, primary refractoriness, refractoriness to last LOT, refractoriness to last anti-CD20-containing regimen, and prior CAR T exposure had worse outcomes (i.e., challenging-to-treat R/R DLBCL) compared with those without these characteristics. Outcomes in patients with R/R DLBCL treated with chemotherapy, single-agent rituximab/obinutuzumab, single-agent lenalidomide, or combinations of these agents remain poor, especially for those with challenging-to-treat R/R DLBCL. These findings underscore the unmet need for new, safe, and effective therapies, especially for challenging-to-treat R/R DLBCL populations.

Budget Impact of Introducing Fixed-Duration Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma After Two or More Lines of Systemic Therapy in the USA.

This study aimed to assess the budget impact of introducing fixed-duration mosunetuzumab as a treatment option for adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies and to estimate the total cumulative costs per patient in the USA. A 3-year budget impact model was developed for a hypothetical 1-million-member cohort enrolled in a mixed commercial/Medicare health plan. Comparators were: axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, tazemetostat, rituximab plus lenalidomide, copanlisib, and older therapies (rituximab or obinutuzumab ± chemotherapy). Costs per patient comprised treatment-associated costs including the drug, its administration, adverse events, and routine care. Dosing and safety data were ascertained from respective package inserts and clinical trial data. Drug costs (March 2023) were estimated based on the average wholesale acquisition cost reported in AnalySource®, and all other costs were based on published sources and inflated to 2022 US dollars. Market shares were obtained from Genentech internal projections and expert opinion. Budget impact outcomes were presented on a per-member per-month basis. Compared with a scenario without mosunetuzumab, its introduction over 3 years resulted in a budget increase of $69,812 (1% increase) and an average per-member per-month budget impact of $0.0019. Among the newer therapies, mosunetuzumab had the second-lowest cumulative per patient cost (mosunetuzumab = $202,039; axicabtagene ciloleucel = $505,845; tisagenlecleucel = $476,293; rituximab plus lenalidomide = $263,520; tazemetostat = $250,665; copanlisib = $127,293) and drug costs, and its introduction only increased total drug costs by 0.1%. By year 3, the cumulative difference in the per patient cost with mosunetuzumab was -$303,805 versus axicabtagene ciloleucel, -$274,254 versus tisagenlecleucel, -$61,481 versus rituximab plus lenalidomide, -$48,625 versus tazemetostat, and $74,747 versus copanlisib. Older therapies were less costly with 3-year cumulative costs that ranged from $36,512 to $147,885. Over 3 years, the estimated cumulative per patient cost of mosunetuzumab is lower than most available newer therapies, resulting in a small increase in the budget after its formulary adoption for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

Deep and Durable Responses with Epcoritamab SC Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Data from the Epcore NHL-1 Follicular Lymphoma Dose-Expansion Cohort

Deep and Durable Responses with Epcoritamab SC Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Data from the Epcore NHL-1 Follicular Lymphoma Dose-Expansion Cohort

Analysis of PET-CT Derived Radiomic Biomarkers with Efficacy, Safety, and Expansion of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Analysis of PET-CT Derived Radiomic Biomarkers with Efficacy, Safety, and Expansion of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Nelarabine-containing salvage therapy and conditioning regimen in transplants for pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma.

Therapy for relapsed or refractory (r/r) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) in children is challenging, and new treatment methods are needed. We retrospectively analyzed eight patients with r/r T-ALL (five patients) and T-LBL (three patients) who were treated with nelarabine (NEL) plus etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and intrathecal therapy, administered 3days apart. Five patients achieved a complete response, and the other three achieved a partial response (PR). All patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after two cycles of treatment, except for one patient who received one cycle. Three patients who had previously received HSCT were treated with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, including fludarabine, melphalan, and NEL; one survived for over 5years after the second HSCT. Grade 2 neuropathy occurred in one patient, but other severe toxicities commonly associated with NEL were not observed during NEL administration in combination with chemotherapy. The 2-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 60.0% and 36.5%, respectively. The addition of NEL to reinduction chemotherapy was useful in achieving remission and did not lead to excessive toxicity. In addition, a conditioning regimen, including NEL, appeared to be effective in patients who had previously undergone HSCT.

A nationwide analysis of the treatment patterns, survival, and medical costs in Korean patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Approximately one-third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are refractory to treatment or experience relapse after initial therapy. Unfortunately, treatment options for older patients and those who experience relapse or become refractory to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are limited. This nationwide population-based study aimed to identify treatment patterns, survival times, and treatment costs in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL (R/R DLBCL). Between 2011 and 2020, data on patients with R/R DLBCL were retrieved from the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, encompassing the entire population. We identified the treatment patterns for each treatment line using a Sankey diagram and calculated the median time to the subsequent treatment in line. Median overall and progression-free survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Finally, the medical costs incurred during DLBCL treatment were calculated for each treatment line and the costs related to HSCT were summarized at the episode level. A total of 864 patients with R/R DLBCL who received second-line treatment were identified, and a regimen of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) was administered the most. Among them, 353 were refractory or relapsed cases that were treated with third-line treatments. The median times for second-line to third-line, third-line to fourth-line, fourth-line to fifth-line, and fifth-line to sixth-line treatment failures gradually decreased (3.93, 2.86, 1.81, and 1.38 months, respectively). The median overall survival time was 8.90 and 4.73 months following the second-line and third-line treatments, respectively. In the third-line treatment setting, the patients did not show a significant difference in survival time after HSCT. The median medical cost was $39,491 across all treatment lines including the cost of HSCT which was $22,054. The treatment patterns in patients with R/R DLBCL, especially at third-line treatments and thereafter, were complicated, and their prognosis was poor despite the high medical costs. Novel and effective treatment options are expected to improve the prognosis and alleviate the economic burden of patients with R/R DLBCL.

Impact of Complete Response (CR) on Long-Term Survival Among Patients Receiving Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (axi-cel) for Relapsed or Refractory (r/r) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Impact of Complete Response (CR) on Long-Term Survival Among Patients Receiving Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (axi-cel) for Relapsed or Refractory (r/r) Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

The Combination of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib with High-Dose Chemotherapy (HDC) and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant (ASCT) Demonstrates High Activity for Refractory Lymphomas, Including Prior Failures of CAR-T

The Combination of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib with High-Dose Chemotherapy (HDC) and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant (ASCT) Demonstrates High Activity for Refractory Lymphomas, Including Prior Failures of CAR-T

Pirtobrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a profile of its use

Pirtobrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a profile of its use

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies approved for relapsed/refractory aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Significant costs and complex manufacturing underscore the importance of evidence-based counseling regarding the outcomes of these treatments. With the aim of examining the efficacy and safety of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL, we performed a systematic literature search of comparative studies evaluating outcomes in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL after treatment with axi-cel or tisa-cel. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and hematotoxicity. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to generate summary statistics. A total of 2372 participants were included in the 8 studies in our analysis. The dropout rate between apheresis and infusion was 13% for axi-cel versus 18% for tisa-cel, and the median time from apheresis to infusion was 32 days versus 45 days. Axi-cel showed higher odds for a complete response (OR, 1.65; P < .001) and was associated with higher odds for PFS at 1 year after infusion (OR, .60; P < .001). OS appeared to be improved with axi-cel (OR, .84; 95% CI, .68 to 1.02; P = .08), whereas the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 11.5% for axi-cel versus 3.7% for tisa-cel (P = .002). The main predictors for survival were lactate dehydrogenase level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and response to bridging, and axi-cel maintained superior efficacy even in elderly patients. In terms of safety, axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of any-grade CRS (OR, 3.23; P < .001), but not of grade ≥3 CRS (P = .92). Axi-cel was associated with significantly higher odds of severe ICANS grade ≥3 (OR, 4.03; P < .001). In terms of hematotoxicity, axi-cel was significantly associated with higher odds of severe neutropenia at 1 month after infusion (OR, 2.06; P = .003). As a result, axi-cel was associated with significantly greater resource utilization, including prolonged hospital stay, more frequent intensive care admission, and use of agents such as tocilizumab for toxicity management. We provide strong evidence of the greater efficacy of axi-cel versus tisa-cel in relapsed/refractory aggressive LBCL. The higher toxicity and NRM seen with axi-cel might not counterbalance the overall results, highlighting the need for timely intervention and careful selection of patients, balancing resource utilization and clinical benefit.

Autologous stem cell transplant in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that responded to salvage chemotherapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is the new standard of care in fit patients with refractory or early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there may still be a role for salvage chemotherapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in certain circumstances (e.g., lack of resources for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, chemosensitive relapses). We retrospectively studied 230 patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL who underwent ST and ASCT. The median line of ST was one (range, 1-3). Best response before ASCT was complete response in 106 (46%) and partial response in 124 (54%) patients. The median follow-up after ASCT was 89.4 months. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.1 and 43.3 months, respectively. Patients relapsing between 6 to 12 months after frontline therapy had a numerically better median PFS (29.6 months) and OS (88.5 months). Patients who required one line of ST, compared to those requiring more than one line, had a better median PFS (37.9 vs. 3.9 months; P=0.0005) and OS (68.3 vs. 12.0 months; P=0.0005). Patients who achieved complete response had a better median PFS (71.1 vs. 6.3 months; P<0.0001) and OS (110.3 vs. 18.9 months; P<0.0001) than those in partial response. Patients who achieved complete response after one line of ST had the most favorable median PFS (88.5 months) and OS (117.2 months). Post-ASCT survival outcomes of patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL appeared reasonable and were particularly favorable in those who required only one line of ST to achieve complete response before ASCT, highlighting the role of this procedure in select patients with chemosensitive disease.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era

BackgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is an effective and available local treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, the value of hypofractionated RT in this setting has not been confirmed.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received hypofractionated RT between January 2020 and August 2022 at a single institution. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and acute side effects were analyzed.ResultsA total of 30 patients were included. The median dose for residual disease was 36 Gy, at a dose per fraction of 2.3–5 Gy. After RT, the ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 90% and 80%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2–27 months), 10 patients (33.3%) experienced disease progression and three died. The 1-year OS and PFS rates for all patients were 81.8% and 66.3%, respectively. The majority (8/10) of post-RT progressions involved out-of-field relapses. Patients with relapsed diseases, no response to systemic therapy, multiple lesions at the time of RT, and no response to RT were associated with out-of-field relapses. PFS was associated with response to RT (P = 0.001) and numbers of residual sites (P < 0.001). No serious non-hematological adverse effects (≥ grade 3) associated with RT were reported.ConclusionThese data suggest that hypofractionated RT was effective and tolerable for patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma, especially for those that exhibited localized residual disease.