Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Research Articles

Avadomide plus obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CC-122-NHL-001): a multicentre, dose escalation and expansion phase 1 study

Avadomide (CC-122) is a novel oral cereblon-modulating agent with promising activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We aimed to examine the safety and preliminary activity of avadomide plus obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CC-122-NHL-001 was a phase 1b dose escalation and expansion study at eight sites in France, Italy, and the Netherlands. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had histologically confirmed CD20-positive relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and had received previous treatment. In the dose expansion phase, only patients with previously treated relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (grade 1, 2, or 3a) were included. Avadomide was administered in escalating doses and two formulations: active pharmaceutical ingredient in capsule in 1·0 mg, 2·0 mg, 3·0 mg, and 4·0 mg doses and as formulated capsules in 3·0 mg and 4·0 mg doses orally once daily on days 1-5 followed by 2 days off (5-7-day schedule) every week of each 28-day cycle. Obinutuzumab 1000 mg was administered intravenously on days 2, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-8. Primary objectives were to determine the safety and tolerability, the non-tolerated dose, maximum tolerated dose, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). All patients who received treatment were included in the safety analyses. Efficacy-evaluable patients completed at least one cycle of treatment and had baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02417285 and EudraCT 2014-003333-26, and is ongoing. Between June 24, 2015, and Dec 5, 2018, 73 patients were enrolled and treated; 19 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 53 follicular lymphoma, and one marginal zone lymphoma. Median follow-up was 253 days (IQR 127-448). The median number of previous anticancer regimens was three (IQR 2-4). The maximum tolerated dose and non-tolerated dose were not reached in the dose escalation phase. On the basis of safety and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data, the avadomide RP2D was established as 3·0 mg as formulated capsules on a 5-7-day schedule in combination with 1000 mg of obinutuzumab. Patients enrolled in the expansion cohort received the established RP2D of avadomide. Across all doses, three patients had dose-limiting toxicities; one patient treated at the RP2D had dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 sepsis). The most common adverse events of grade 3 and above were neutropenia (41 [56%] of 73) and thrombocytopenia (17 [23%] of 73). 34 (47%) patients had serious adverse events, which were considered to be avadomide-related in 23 (32%) of 73 patients and obinutuzumab-related in 20 (27%) of 73 patients. Two treatment-related deaths occurred, one owing to tumour flare and one from acute myeloid leukaemia after study discontinuation. Avadomide plus obinutuzumab has a manageable toxicity, being a tolerable treatment option for most patients. Although the prespecified threshold for activity was not met in the trial, we believe that the preliminary antitumour activity of cereblon modulators plus next-generation anti-CD20 antibodies in heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma warrants further investigation as a chemotherapy-free option in this setting. Celgene Corporation.

Copanlisib in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

B-cell receptor signaling is important in the pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The PI3K pathway is activated by B-cell receptor signaling. Recently, several PI3K inhibitors have been in development for the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Copanlisib is a PI3Kα and PI3Kδ inhibitor that has been approved for its use as third-line therapy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. The two other PI3k inhibitors approved by the US FDA in this setting are idelalisib and duvelisib. In this review, we compare the efficacy and adverse event profile of these different PI3K inhibitors and discuss the advantages and challenges of using copanlisib along with a guide on managing routinely encountered adverse events in the clinics.

Copanlisib for the treatment of adults with relapsed follicular lymphoma

ABSTRACT Introduction Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common histotype of lymphoma and is considered an incurable disease. The need for new treatment options has led to the development of innovative targeted agents, including inhibitors of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Areas covered Copanlisib, an intravenous pan–class I PI3K inhibitor, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of relapsed FL in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. In this article, we critically review the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, safety, dosage, administration, and role of copanlisib in the treatment of relapsed FL. Expert opinion Treatment with copanlisib results in clinically relevant and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory FL. In addition, copanlisib has a manageable safety profile in this population, with low rates of severe hepatic transaminitis, diarrhea, colitis, and noninfectious pneumonitis. Further investigations of copanlisib within combination regimens will potentially allow to move copanlisib to an earlier line of therapy for FL. However, results of the CHRONOS-4 clinical trial evaluating copanlisib with standard chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab with bendamustine or CHOP) are not yet available.

Final Results of a Phase I/II Trial of the Combination Bendamustine and Rituximab With Temsirolimus (BeRT) in Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Follicular Lymphoma.

In this phase I/II study, we explored the combination of Temsirolimus with Bendamustine and Rituximab (BeRT) in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients with 1 to 3 previous therapies received Bendamustine (90 mg/m2, day 1 + 2) and Rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1) with Temsirolimus in doses from 25 to 75 mg in phase I and 50 mg Temsirolimus in phase II, added on day 1, 8, 15 of a 28 days cycle. The primary endpoint of the phase II was ORR at the end of treatment. Overall, 39 (29 MCL, 10 FL) patients were included. Median age was 71 years and median pretreatment number was 2. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were rare and included hyperglycemia in 3 patients (7%) and angioedema in 2 patients (5%). Infectious complications grade 3/4 were observed in 9 patients (23%). Hematologic grade 3/4 events included leukopenia in 22 (56%), neutropenia in 18 (46%), lymphopenia in 16 (41%) and thrombocytopenia in 14 patients (36%). An objective response (best response) was observed in 33/39 patients (89%; 24 MCL (89%) and 9 FL (90%)), including 14 CR (38%; 12 MCL (36%) and 2 FL (20%)). Median PFS is 1.5y for MCL and 1.82 years for FL, and median OS has not been reached for either entity. This data demonstrates promising efficacy of Temsirolimus in r/r MCL and FL with acceptable toxicity. The BeRT regimen may be used as a treatment option for both entities.

Pharmacokinetics and Systems Pharmacology of Anti-CD47 Macrophage Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Hu5F9-G4

Background: Hu5F9-G4, a human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody (mAb) has recently been granted fast-track designation by the FDA for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma. Hu5F9-G4 has the ability to block CD47-SIRPα signaling along with anti- EGFR and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint activity that is involved in a variety of cancers like solid tumors, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), colorectal cancer (CRC), breast, ovarian and bladder cancers, and hematological malignancies. Thus, Hu5F9-G4 is an important biologic that has increasing clinical relevance in cancer care. Methods: We queried PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Science Direct and Scopus databases with keywords pertaining to Hu5F9-G4. In addition, we have included the Hu5F9-G4 data presented at the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting and 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA). Results: We discuss the mechanistic basis and preclinical evidence for the anticancer activity of Hu5F9-G4. Further, we delineate clinical studies, alone and in combination with anti-CD20 mAb rituximab, anti-EGFR mAb cetuximab, PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors avelumab and atezolizumab, and anti-HER2 mAb trastuzumab. Moreover, the potential adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Hu5F9-G4 with emphasis on the role of CD47-SIRPα signaling in phagocytosis are presented. Conclusions: Taken together, we review the pharmacokinetics and systems pharmacology of Hu5F9-G4 which appears to hold great promise for the future of cancer care.

Copanlisib-Associated Skin Toxicity: A Peculiar Case of Copanlisib-Induced Skin Rash in a Patient with Refractory Follicular Lymphoma

Background: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is an essential target in lymphoid tumors therapy. Copanlisib is a novel class of medication that targets PI3K and used for the treatment of relapsing or refractory B-cell lymphomas. Case Presentation: A 42-year-old woman presents to our hospital for worsening abdominal pain. Examination pertinent for axillary lymphadenopathy, and abdominal ascites. CT chest, abdomen and pelvis reported multiple lung nodules, pleural effusions, extensive retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Lymph node and bone marrow biopsies confirmed B-cell follicular lymphoma and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing was positive for translocation t(14:18). Her disease was refractory to multiple chemotherapy regimens. Thus, initiated copanlisib therapy with a remarkable response, but the patient developed a diffuse maculopapular rash and skin biopsy-proven to be drug rash. Therefore, copanlisib was discontinued. Conclusion: Here, we report a case of a middle-aged woman who developed a rash after the fifth cycle of copanlisib therapy. This case report will create awareness of evolving possible side effects in this novel chemotherapeutic agent.

Management of psoriasis-like rash associated with idelalisib monotherapy in a patient with refractory follicular lymphoma: a\xa0case report

BackgroundFollicular lymphoma is an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is most commonly diagnosed in elderly individuals. The majority of patients with follicular lymphoma present with advanced disease. Despite the recent advances in treatment, there remains a substantial unmet need for effective treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. The PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2014 as a monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with follicular lymphoma that is refractory to two prior lines of treatment. Real-world evidence from patients with follicular lymphoma treated with idelalisib indicates its utility in these patients.Case presentationThis case report describes an 82-year-old, retired, white, female patient with refractory follicular lymphoma who achieved a partial response with idelalisib treatment. Despite experiencing two incidences of a psoriasis-like rash during idelalisib treatment that required effective management with topical steroids, the patient was able to restart treatment successfully and maintain a continued partial response.ConclusionsThe clinical relevance of the effective management of adverse events in this case demonstrates the opportunity to enable patients to remain on therapy, thereby maintaining long-term response and improving overall outcomes.

Follow-Up Study of Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated Using Clarithromycin: Intravenous Erythromycin Combined with Prednisolone Treatment is Effective for Refractory FL Accompanied with an Ocular Lesion

Follow-Up Study of Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated Using Clarithromycin: Intravenous Erythromycin Combined with Prednisolone Treatment is Effective for Refractory FL Accompanied with an Ocular Lesion

Idelalisib for Treatment of Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Idelalisib (IDEL) is approved as monotherapy in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) and with rituximab (IDEL+R) for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Toxic effects can be severe and treatment-limiting. Outcomes in a real-world population are not yet characterized. We compared IDEL treatment outcomes in the clinical setting with outcomes in clinical trial data. This cohort study compared clinical trial participants treated with IDEL, aged 65 years or older, in studies 101-09 and 312-0116 with Medicare beneficiaries treated with IDEL of the same disease state and treatment regimen. Study 101-09 was a phase 2, single-group, open-label trial supporting accelerated approval of IDEL for relapsed or refractory FL. Study 312-0116 was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial supporting approval of IDEL+R for relapsed CLL. Analyses were conducted between February and December 2018. Treatment duration, on-treatment and overall mortality, and serious and fatal infections were compared between trial participants and Medicare beneficiaries. Cox proportional hazards models quantified differences by cohort. We identified 26 trial participants (mean [SD] age, 73 [4.9] years; 12 [46.2%] women) and 305 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 76 [6.9] years; 103 [54.8%] women) receiving IDEL for FL and 89 trial participants (mean [SD] age, 74 [6.0] years; 30 [33.7%] women) and 294 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 76 [6.3] years; 111 [37.8%] women) receiving IDEL+R for CLL. Medicare beneficiaries were older with higher comorbidity; had a shorter median treatment duration for CLL (173 days vs 473 days, P < .001) but not FL (114, days vs 160 days, P = .38); a numerically higher mortality rate (CLL: HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.93-2.11; FL: HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.69-2.78); and a significantly higher fatal infection rate per 100 person-years for CLL (18.4 vs 9.8, P = .04) and a numerically higher rate for FL (27.6 vs 18.6, P = .54), compared with trial participants. Trial participants had approximately twice as many dose reductions (CLL: 32.6% vs 18.0%; P = .003; FL: 38.5% vs 16.1%; P = .02). Among Medicare beneficiaries, a hospitalized infection within 6 months prior to IDEL initiation was associated with a 2.11-fold increased risk for on-treatment fatal infections (95% CI, 1.44-3.10). Despite a March 2016 recommendation for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis in patients treated with IDEL, prophylaxis rates were low after March 2016 (FL: 25%, CLL: 37%). We observed substantial imbalances in baseline comorbidities and treatment outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries and trial participants aged 65 years or older. Immunosuppression-related toxic effects, including infections, may have been somewhat reduced in trials by more frequent dose reductions and exclusion of patients with ongoing infections. Selective eligibility criteria and closer monitoring of trial patients may be responsible for limited generalizability of trial data to clinical practice.

Lenalidomide combined with interferon and interleukin-2 sequenced by thalidomide in treatment of refractory follicular cell lymphoma: report of one case and review of literature

目的 观察来那度胺联合干扰素、白细胞介素2序贯沙利度胺治疗难治滤泡性淋巴瘤（FL）的疗效。 方法 回顾性分析广西医科大学第一附属医院应用来那度胺联合干扰素和白细胞介素2序贯沙利度胺治疗1例难治FL患者的临床资料，并进行相关文献复习。 结果 该患者治疗后全身肿大淋巴结明显缩小，获得完全缓解，无明显不良反应。 结论 来那度胺联合干扰素、白细胞介素2序贯沙利度胺治疗难治FL有一定疗效，可作为治疗难治FL的一种新选择。

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Treated with Idelalisib in a Community Oncology Setting

Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA, Zydelig®) is the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor and is approved in the U.S. as an oral monotherapy for relapsed / refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) after at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. IDELA's regulatory approval was based on a phase 2, open-label clinical trial in 125 patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Gopal et al., NEJM, 2014) and outcomes in the FL subgroup were published by Salles et al. (Haematologica, 2017). The current study evaluates the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients treated with IDELA for R/R FL in a real-world setting. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with R/R FL (grades 1, 2, and 3a) and treated with IDELA within the US Oncology Network (USON) between 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient data were obtained from USON's structured electronic health records' system, iKnowMed (iKM)TM. Manual chart review (ChR) was used to determine physician response and to confirm IDELA treatment patterns. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Descriptive statistics were generated for outcomes of interest, including duration of therapy (DoT), median follow-up, and adverse event (AE) frequency. Results: A total of 124 patients with FL and prescribed IDELA were identified in iKM TM. After Chr confirming the diagnosis of follicular lymphoma diagnosis and initiation of IDELA, 88 patients were retained for analysis. Median age of patients was 68.9 years, with 52.3% female and the majority white and non-Hispanic (90.9% and 93.2%, respectively, Table 1). The most common regimens immediately prior to IDELA initiation were bendamustine + rituximab (22.7%), rituximab (17%), and rituximab maintenance (11.4%). Eighty-six (97.7%) patients had co-morbidities categorized as vascular (50%), endocrine (33%), respiratory (13.6%), or cardiac (12.5%). Thirteen (14.8%), 21 (23.9%), and 54 (61.4%) patients initiated IDELA in second line (2L), 3L, and &gt;4L, respectively. Baseline lab values at IDELA initiation were similar regardless of line of therapy (LOT). mDOT was 5.5 mos. for the entire population and was similar across all LOTs (4.1 mos., 6.1 mos., and 5.5 mos. in 2L, 3L, and &gt;4L, respectively). AEs were noted in 45.5% with the most common being gastrointestinal (31.8%) and dermatologic (10.2%). Respiratory and infectious AEs were noted in 2.3% and 1.1%, respectively, although Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis was rarely prescribed (2.3%). Toxicity as a reason for IDELA discontinuation varied in frequency across LOT and was more common in 2L compared to 3L and &gt;4L (91.7% compared to 43.8% and 46.9%, respectively). With a median follow-up of 18.6 months for the population, the mPFS was 11.4 mos. [95%CI: 8.5,17.0] and mOS was 32.5 mos. [95% CI: 25.3,NR]. Stratified by LOT, median follow-up time, mOS, and mPFS were greater in 2L (30.8 mos., NR [95% CI: 27.37,NR], and 29.0 mos. [95% CI: 8.6,NR], respectively) than in 3L or &gt;4L (3L: 17.9 mos., 29.4 mos. [95%CI: 18.6,NR], and 17.5 mos. [95% CI: 6.1,NR]; &gt;4L: 16.5 mos., 25.3 mos. [95%CI: 13.5.,NR], and 8.6 mos. [95% CI: 6.1,12.6], respectively, Figures 1 and 2). Conclusion: Findings from this analysis suggest that R/R FL patients treated with IDELA in a real-world setting experience a similar mDOT and mPFS as those treated in the clinical trial setting (Salles et al., Haematologica, 2017). Patients treated in 2L demonstrated longer PFS and OS compared to later lines, but also experienced increased IDELA discontinuation due to toxicity, perhaps reflecting a lower incidence of progressive disease in earlier treatment lines, or a more immunocompetent population leading to higher rates of autoimmune AEs. Use of PJP prophylaxis in IDELA-treated patients was uncommon, an observation suggesting an opportunity for provider education. Our findings enhance available data on relapsed FL patient outcomes in real-world clinical practice and support the use of IDELA in patients with R/R FL after at least 2 systemic therapies. Disclosures Andorsky: Gilead: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Chan:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:McKesson: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Robert:McKesson: Employment. Awan:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Idelalisib is a PI3 kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed follicular B-cell lymphoma who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. Some patients in this observational study used Idelalisib after one prior systemic treatment.

A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Arm Study Comparing 2 Intermittent Dosing Schedules of Duvelisib in Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL) (TEMPO)

Background Duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In multiple phase 1-3 studies that included patients with iNHL, duvelisib was shown to be efficacious, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. This study will evaluate whether duvelisib efficacy at the approved 25 mg twice daily (BID) dose can be achieved and maintained with an acceptable or improved safety profile by the inclusion of prespecified 2-week drug holidays in patients with R/R iNHL. Study Design and Methods TEMPO is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, international, phase 2 study of duvelisib in adult patients with R/R iNHL in whom ≥ 1 line of prior therapy has failed. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of duvelisib administered with prescribed drug holidays, with the primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) by the 2007 revised International Working Group criteria. Key secondary endpoints include ORR by the 2014 Lugano criteria, progression-free survival, overall survival, time to treatment failure, duration of response, lymph node response rate, time to the first response, adverse event profile, and determination of pharmacokinetics parameters. Exploratory objectives include assessment of quality of life and biomarkers of treatment response and toxicity. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed FL grades 1 to 3a, marginal zone lymphoma (splenic, nodal, or extranodal) or small lymphocytic lymphoma, radiological evidence of disease progression and ≥ 1 bidimensionally measurable lesion ≥ 1.5 cm, adequate organ function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Key exclusion criteria include prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; previous treatment with a PI3K inhibitor; history of drug-induced colitis or drug-induced pneumonitis; ongoing treatment for systemic infection; central nervous system NHL; prolonged QT interval; history of tuberculosis treatment within the 2 past years; history of stroke, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia requiring medication or mechanical control within the past 6 months; history of or concurrent interstitial lung disease of any severity and/or severely impaired lung function; ongoing treatment with chronic immunosuppressants; and any unstable or severe uncontrolled medical condition. A total of 102 patients are planned to be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 2 arms and stratified by number of prior therapies (1 or &gt; 1), bulky disease status (longest diameter of baseline lesion &lt; 5 cm or ≥ 5 cm), and time since last recurrence (≥ 24 months or &lt; 24 months). In arm 1, patients will receive duvelisib 25 mg BID for one 10-week (W) cycle followed by 25 mg BID on W3 and W4 of each subsequent 4-week cycle. In arm 2, patients will receive duvelisib 25 mg BID on W1, W2, W5, W6, W9, and W10 of one 10-week cycle and then on W3 and W4 of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. This study will test the null hypothesis that the ORR in each arm is ≤ 30% against the alternative that the ORR is ≥ 55%. The study has a 2-stage design. In stage 1, 15 patients will be enrolled in each arm, with response assessment after ≥ 3 cycles. If there are fewer than 6 partial or complete responses, consideration may be given to terminating the arm. Otherwise, in stage 2, 36 additional patients will be enrolled, for a total of 51 per arm. Enrollment is planned to be initiated in August 2019. Approximately 50 sites will be open for enrollment across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Disclosures Karmali: Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution; Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau. Youssoufian:Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Sprott:SMOC Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:FemtoDx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents &amp; Royalties: Inventor; Verastem Oncology: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents &amp; Royalties: Inventor; Hillstream Biopharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Narasimhan:Verastem: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:Verastem: Employment. Patrick:Verastem Oncology: Employment. Zalutskaya:Verastem Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board. OffLabel Disclosure: Duvelisib (DUV), a dual PI3K-delta,gamma inhibitor, is US FDA approved at 25 mg twice daily (BID) for the treatment of R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma after at least 2 lines of prior therapy and R/R follicular lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapies.

Impact of Idelalisib Treatment Interruption with or without Dose Reduction on Outcomes in Relapsed / Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA) is the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor and is approved as a monotherapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma and in combination with rituximab for R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We previously evaluated IDELA treatment interruption as a mechanism to mitigate treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and found that limited interruption with clinically appropriate re-challenging resulted in superior clinical outcomes. These findings did not comprehensively address the potential confound of interruptions inherently being associated with longer duration of therapy (DoT). Furthermore, the compound effect of IDELA dose reduction together with treatment interruption on IDELA efficacy was not assessed. Objectives: 1) To evaluate whether the benefit of IDELA interruption is retained in patients on therapy &gt;180 days, a duration previously found to be associated with longer overall survival among patients who discontinued IDELA due to an AE; and 2) To compare clinical outcomes of patients who reduced IDELA dosing in addition to interrupting IDELA with those of patients who interrupted IDELA without additional dose reduction. Methods: Using data from Gilead-sponsored trials of patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) treated with IDELA monotherapy (N=125, Gopal et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 2014) or with R/R CLL treated with IDELA + anti-CD20 (N=110, Furman et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 2014; and N=173, Jones et al., Lancet Haematol., 2017), DoT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients on IDELA therapy &gt;180 days with vs. without interruption and between patients who experienced Interruption and Dose Reduction (IDR) vs. patients who experienced Interruption but NoDose Reduction (INoDR) at any point during IDELA treatment. Interruption was defined as missing at least one IDELA treatment day due to an AE and dose reduction could have occurred before or after the first interruption. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. Results: Sixty-nine of 125 patients with R/R iNHL (55.2%) and 222 of 283 patients with R/R CLL (78.4%) remained on IDELA therapy &gt;180 days with 29 (42.0%) and 103 (46.4%) of them, respectively, experiencing interruption on or after day 180 (Table 1). The proportions of patients with interruption before day 180 were similar within each of these populations. Among patients on therapy &gt;180 days, those with treatment interruption on or after 180 days had a longer median (m) DOT than patients without interruption (Table 1). Both PFS and OS were longer in CLL patients who interrupted compared to those who did not interrupt (mPFS=28.9 mos. vs. 17.3 mos. and mOS=not reached [NR] vs. 40.4 mos. for with interruption vs. without interruption, respectively, Table 1 and Figure 1). In patients with iNHL, no difference was observed in PFS or OS between patients who interrupted vs. those who did not (Table 1). Of patients who experienced at least one AE-induced interruption at any point during IDELA therapy (n=63 iNHL and n=157 CLL), 47 iNHL patients (74.6%) and 84 CLL patients (53.5%) also had dose reduction. Two iNHL patients (1.6%) and 5 CLL patients (1.8%) had IDELA dose reduction but no interruption. Both iNHL and CLL patients with IDR experienced a similar PFS compared to patients with INoDR (mPFS=16.5 mos. vs. 14.2 mos. for iNHL and 21.8 mos. vs. 22.1 mos. for CLL with IDR vs. INoDR, respectively, Table 2). However, OS was longer in both iNHL and CLL patients with IDR compared to INoDR (mOS=61.2 mos. vs. 35.3 mos. for iNHL and NR vs. 42.4 mos. for CLL, respectively, Table 2; CLL patients shown in Figure 2). Discussion: IDELA treatment interruption is not associated with rapid clinical deterioration, as observed with some B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors. No clear relationship between IDELA DoT and frequency of interruption was observed. When normalized for DoT &gt;180 days, IDELA treatment interruption retained its clinical benefit in the CLL population. When utilized together with IDELA interruption, dose reduction did not lead to inferior clinical outcomes but instead extended OS in both iNHL and CLL populations. Adherence to treatment interruption and dose reduction guidance as outlined in the IDELA USPI may optimize IDELA tolerability and efficacy for patients with iNHL and CLL. Disclosures Ma: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Chan:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gu:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Xing:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Rajakumaraswamy:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

PCN272 OBINUTUZUMAB TREATMENT ON 1ST LINE HIGH AND INTERMEDIATE RISK FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA. SHORT-TERM REDUCTION OF RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY DIRECT MEDICAL COSTS IN ARGENTINA AND CHILE.

To estimate the potential epidemiology and economic impact of Obinutuzumab on avoided relapsed and refractory Follicular Lymphoma (RRFL) patients due to its introduction in the Chilean and Argentinian 1st line High and Intermediate Risk Follicular Lymphoma (1LFL HR+IR) population. A budget impact model was developed to assess the reduction in RRFL incidence and costs as a result of 1st line treatment with Obinutuzumab (O) instead of Rituximab (R), in Chile and Argentina. Age-specific NHL incidence rates from GLOBOCAN were applied to countries population estimates to determine its annual patients. 1st Line and RRFL local data was collected using institutional surveys, databases and published literature sources. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) was used to define high and intermediate risk proportions within the 1LFL cases. Progression-free survival (PFS) curves of R and O regimes were used to quantify the projected decline in the number of 1LFL HR+IR relapsing to RRFL over a 5-year period. Incremental benefit of O over R was based on the PFS derived from the Gallium study. RRFL direct medical costs were calculated using publicly available prices and adapting local treatment algorithms from both countries. Costs were shown in US Dollars using the official exchange rate for June 1, 2019. Among 1LFL HR+IR incident patients over 1 year, assuming 100% treatment uptake of O compared to 100% of R, the number of of RRFL cases projected to be prevented by the Chilean and Argentinian health systems is a total of 213 over 5 years (46%). This represented a sum of us$12.377.289 of costs savings. 1LFL HR+IR treatment with O instead of R can lead to reductions in RRFL incidence over the short-term. This may be translated into substantial economic benefits in Chile and Argentina in the near future.

Follow-Up Study of Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated Using Clarithromycin: Intravenous Erythromycin Combined with Prednisolone Treatment is Effective for Refractory FL Accompanied with an Ocular Lesion

Follow-Up Study of Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated Using Clarithromycin: Intravenous Erythromycin Combined with Prednisolone Treatment is Effective for Refractory FL Accompanied with an Ocular Lesion

CAR-T 19 combined with reduced-dose PD-1 blockade therapy for treatment of refractory follicular lymphoma: A case report.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has changed the typical outcomes of relapsed/refractory B-cell leukemia and lymphoma. However, treatment effectiveness for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma has been less satisfactory compared with patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The present study described a case of refractory follicular lymphoma. A high expression of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) was measured on CD3+ T cells (80.90%) in peripheral blood samples obtained from the patient enrolled in this study, indicating that treatment with autologous CAR-T 19 cell therapy may not be successful. Therefore, a therapy regimen consisting of CAR-T 19 cells in combination with a reduced dose of nivolumab (1.5 mg/kg) for PD-1 blockade was used. A low dose of PD-1 blockade therapy was used to reduce the adverse effects associated with the combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and CAR-T 19 cells. This salvage therapy resulted in remission that lasted for >10 months.

Obinutuzumab combined with lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory follicular B-cell lymphoma (GALEN): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study

Lenalidomide plus rituximab is approved to treat patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Obinutuzumab has been shown to enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, and direct B-cell killing better than rituximab. Our aim was to determine the activity and safety of lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. In this multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients were enrolled from 24 Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation centres in France. Eligible patients (age ≥18 years) had histologically confirmed CD20-positive relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma of WHO grade 1, 2, or 3a; an ECOG performance status of 0-2; and received at least one previous rituximab-containing therapy. Patients received oral lenalidomide (20 mg) plus intravenously infused obinutuzumab as induction therapy (1000 mg; six 28-day cycles), 1-year maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg; 12 28-day cycles; days 2-22) plus obinutuzumab (1000 mg; alternate cycles), and 1-year maintenance with obinutuzumab (1000 mg; six 56-day cycles; day 1). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall response at induction end as per investigator assessment using the 1999 international working group criteria. The secondary endpoints were event-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Analyses were per-protocol; the efficacy population included all patients who received at least one dose of both obinutuzumab and lenalidomide, and the safety population included all patients who received one dose of either investigational drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01582776, and is ongoing but closed to accrual. Between June 11, 2014, and Dec 18, 2015, 89 patients were recruited and 86 patients were evaluable for efficacy and 88 for safety. Median follow-up was 2·6 years (IQR 2·2-2·8). 68 (79%) of 86 evaluable patients (95% CI 69-87) achieved an overall response at induction end, meeting the prespecified primary endpoint. At 2 years, event-free survival was 62% (95% CI 51-72), progression-free survival 65% (95% CI 54-74), duration of response 70% (95% CI 57-79), and overall survival 87% (95% CI 78-93). Complete response was achieved by 33 (38%, 95% CI 28-50) of 86 patients at induction end, and the proportion of patients achieving a best overall response was 70 (81%, 95% CI 72-89) and 72 (84%, 74-91) of 86 patients during induction and treatment, respectively. The most common adverse events were asthenia (n=54, 61%), neutropenia (n=38, 43%), bronchitis (n=36, 41%), diarrhoea (n=35, 40%), and muscle spasms (n=34, 39%). Neutropenia was the most common toxicity of grade 3 or more; four (5%) patients had febrile neutropenia. 57 serious adverse events were reported in 30 (34%) of 88 patients. The most common serious adverse events were basal cell carcinoma (n=5, 6%), febrile neutropenia (n=4, 5%), and infusion-related reaction (n=3, 3%). One patient died due to treatment-related febrile neutropenia. Our data shows that lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab is active in previously treated patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, including those with early relapse, and has a manageable safety profile. Randomised trials of new immunomodulatory regimens, such as GALEN or using GALEN as a backbone, versus lenalidomide plus rituximab, are warranted. Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation, and Celgene and Roche.

Bendamustine-120 plus rituximab therapy for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: a multicenter phase II study

The optimal dose, schedule, and other aspects of bendamustine plus rituximab treatment remain unclear for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL). Herein, we analyzed the efficacy of bendamustine combined with rituximab (RB-120) treatment for Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory FL. This phase II clinical trial included patients with relapsed or refractory FL who received 375mg/m2 rituximab on day 1 and 120mg/m2 bendamustine on days 2 and 3 every 28days for up to 6cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints included the complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the trial (median age 62years, range 42-75years). All patients were previously treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy, and 83.8% were previously treated with the R-CHOP regimen. A median of 5cycles (range 1-6) and 48.6% of patients completed 6cycles. The ORR was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.1-98.3%), with a CR rate of 86.5% (95% CI 71.2-95.5%). The 3-year PFS and OS were 70.9% (95% CI 52.3-83.3%) and 88.9% (95% CI 73.1-95.7%), respectively, with the median 39.5months follow-up duration. The most-frequently observed grade 3/4 adverse events were hematologic: lymphopenia (95%) and neutropenia (70%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. RB-120 showed a good efficacy with equivalent toxicities, compared with the bendamustine 120mg/m2 monotherapy. However, the problem of high drop-out incidences cannot be ignored.

PB2020 EARLY RELAPSED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA‐ IS IT NEW ENTITY WITH DIFFERENT TREATMENT APPROACH?

Background:Although most patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) follow an indolent course with long‐lasting remissions, surviving more than 20 years after diagnosis, a small proportion of patients (20‐25%) has worse outcome due to early relapse or transformation to an aggressive form of lymphoma. The current risk prognosticators are based on the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). There is not a perfect marker to predict those at higher risk of disease progression. FL with short remission duration has been established as a poor prognostic marker for survival and the optimal therapy for these patients is really not known.Aims:To analyze the clinicopathological features of refractory and early relapsed FL, the role of aggressive regimens and correlation between the treatment modality and outcome.Methods:In total, 9 patients with the primary refractory and early relapsed FL were diagnosed in Institute for radiology and oncology of Serbia during the period 2014‐2016. The treatment modality, the response, and follow‐up were registered for all the patients.Results:The median age of patients was 64 years (range, 48‐69). There were 5 male and 4 female patients. All patients were diagnosed with FL (grades 1‐3). There were 3 patients within each histologic grade. All patients presented with Ann Arbor stage III or IV disease and high FLIPI score. The bulky disease was present in 8 patients. Only three patients had normal serum LDH. All patients were treated with immunochemotherapy, R‐CVP or R‐CHOP. The median follow‐up was 33 months (range, 6‐57). Primary refractory disease was registered in 3 patients that had bulky disease, splenomegaly, and elevated serum LDH, who received non‐anthracycline, based regimen and progressed during induction therapy. One patient with primary refractory lymphoma died during induction therapy. Six patients were treated with an anthracycline‐based regimen. The overall response rate (ORR) for all R‐CHOP treated patients was 100% (50% PR and 50% CR after induction therapy). Relapse was documented during Rituximab maintenance within the first 8 months after the induction therapy in non‐refractory patients. Eight patients received Fludarabine‐based second‐line regimen with ORR of 89%. One patient died due to Richter's transformation during Fludarabine treatment. One patient who was transplant‐eligible experienced severe infectious complications following high dose therapy but later responded on local radiotherapy (RT) combined with low dose corticosteroid therapy. The second relapse was registered in three patients. They were treated with involved field RT with good response. Seven patients were still alive at the time of the last follow‐up and all of them remained in achieved response.Summary/Conclusion:The major needs are to upfront identify FL patients, for whom existing immunochemotherapeutic strategies are suboptimal and to find the best second‐line options for these patients. ASCT should be introduced within ≤1 year of treatment failure, early in the course of disease in order to preserve bone marrow capacity. Patients that are not candidates for ASCT can benefit from a less aggressive approach like RT, so there is a potential role of immunomodulators and PI3K inhibitors in overcoming the chemoresistance and establishing durable disease control.

PS1163 PATIENT‐BASED PROSPECTIVE REAL WORLD DATA ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THE DURATION OF TREATMENT INTERRUPTIONS WITH SUBSEQUENT RESUMPTION OF IDELALISIB THERAPY CAN VARY FROM DAYS TO MONTHS

Background:Idelalisib, a first‐in‐class PI3Kδ‐inhibitor, is licensed in the European Union in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and refractory follicular lymphoma (FL). Treatment should be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and may continue for several months or years. Optimal therapy management is therefore important and may include temporary treatment interruptions (TIs) and dose modifications to manage idelalisib associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs).Aims:Recent data from a retrospective analysis of idelalisib clinical studies suggest that patients may benefit from optimal ADR management of idelalisib via TI and subsequent resumption of therapy [Ma et al. ASH 2018]. Here we analyzed frequency and duration of TIs within a prospective observational study. To understand the effect of TIs on the course of disease, we additionally analyzed lymphocyte counts during and after treatment interruption on an individual patient level.Methods:Post‐hoc analysis of a prospective, two‐cohort, multicenter, non‐interventional post‐authorization safety study (PASS) reporting real world safety and effectiveness data on the use of idelalisib in Germany. Inclusion of patients was based on the physician's decision to initiate treatment with idelalisib in accordance with the European Summary of Product Characteristics. Detailed methods, patient characteristics and results were already published at two conferences [Hoechstetter et al. DGHO 2018; Hoechstetter et al. ASH 2018]. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Idelalisib TIs were defined as documented interruptions with subsequent resumption of idelalisib therapy.Results:96 patients (84 CLL and 12 FL patients) enrolled at 45 sites were included until data cut in February 2018 with a median follow‐up of 9.7 months. 58 patients had documented permanent discontinuation of idelalisib therapy. 49 patients had one or more documented TIs with 26 patients (one TI n = 20, two TI n = 6) subsequently resuming therapy. After interruptions, treatment was resumed with the standard or a reduced idelalisib dose of 150 mg or 100 mg twice daily, respectively. The most frequently reported reason for both dose reduction and TI was ADR, only 9 TIs followed an adverse event (AE) not related to idelalisib. The 3 most commonly reported ADRs (events) resulting in TI were diarrhea (9), pulmonary complications (4) and rash (3). The duration of TIs varied widely from only a few to 235 days. The median (range) duration of a single TI was 15 (1–235) days, representing 15 (1–86) days for the first and 16 (5–235) days for the second interruption, respectively. 9 patients had a single interruption with a duration of &gt;30 days. Patient level data demonstrate stable or only moderate changes in lymphocyte counts during this treatment interruption.Summary/Conclusion:Optimal management of idelalisib therapy to achieve best outcomes for patients may include temporary TIs and/or dose modifications. However, little information is available about the duration of idelalisib TIs and the possibility to resume therapy in routine clinical practice. Our analysis of prospectively collected real world data shows that the duration of TIs may vary widely from a few days to several months with about 50% of patients with a TI resuming idelalisib therapy. Patient level data suggest that lymphocyte counts were relatively stable during and after TIs. Our results therefore provide evidence that idelalisib treatment may be interrupted to allow treatment of ADRs/AEs with subsequent resumption of idelalisib therapy.image