Reflex Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Research Articles

Are There More HER2 FISH in the Sea? An Institution’s Experience in Identifying HER2 Positivity Using Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Patients with HER2 Negative Immunohistochemistry

BackgroundApproximately 20% of breast cancers express HER2-positive receptors in the USA. HER2 receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining with equivocal (2+) results commonly undergoes fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for further classification. Current guidelines do not recommend routine FISH testing in IHC-negative (0 or 1+) cases. This study investigates an institution that performs both IHC and FISH testing on all cases to identify the true HER2-positive rate.Patients and MethodsA retrospective chart review from 2015 to 2021 was conducted at an institution where both HER2 IHC and FISH testing were performed at the time of diagnosis for all invasive breast cancers. The rate of true HER2-positive patients was determined, and patient and tumor characteristics were further explored.ResultsA total of 1835 invasive breast cancer cases were primarily treated at this institution. A total of 289 cases were HER2 positive on IHC and FISH testing (15.7%). An additional 38 cases were identified as HER2 negative on IHC, but reclassified as HER2 positive on reflex FISH testing. Total HER2 positive cases increased from 289 (15.7%) to 327 cases (17.8%) with reflex FISH testing.ConclusionsThe additional HER2-positive cases after completing FISH testing on IHC-negative tumors suggests there may be a role for routine FISH testing in addition to standard IHC staining to determine HER2 status for breast cancer. The ethical, prognostic and even benefits of a correct diagnosis outweigh the added expense of FISH testing.

Reflex ROS1 IHC Screening with FISH Confirmation for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Cost-Efficient Strategy in a Public Healthcare System.

ROS1 rearrangements are identified in 1–2% of lung adenocarcinoma cases, and reflex testing is guideline-recommended. We developed a decision model for population-based ROS1 testing from a Canadian public healthcare perspective to determine the strategy that optimized detection of true-positive (TP) cases while minimizing costs and turnaround time (TAT). Eight diagnostic strategies were compared, including reflex single gene testing via immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and biomarker-informed (EGFR/ALK/KRAS wildtype) testing initiated by pathologists and clinician-initiated strategies. Reflex IHC screening with FISH confirmation of positive cases yielded the best results for TAT, TP detection rate, and cost. IHC screening saved CAD 1,000,000 versus reflex FISH testing. NGS was the costliest reflex strategy. Biomarker-informed testing was cost-efficient but delayed TAT. Clinician-initiated testing was the least costly but resulted in long TAT and missed TP cases, highlighting the importance of reflex testing. Thus, reflex IHC screening for ROS1 with FISH confirmation provides a cost-efficient strategy with short TAT and maximizes the number of TP cases detected.

Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.

In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists revised the criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal (2+) classification in their updated guideline. We reviewed invasive breast cancer specimens originally classified as equivocal (2+) under the 2018 guideline that underwent HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing from August 2018 to August 2019 at our Canadian reference hospital to investigate cases with ambiguous staining patterns between the 1+ and 2+ definitions. Demographics, pathologic features, and pre-analytic conditions were recorded. The H&E and corresponding HER2 IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumor type and grade, and classify as HER2 indeterminate, 0, 1+, 2+, or "Intermediate" (staining features between the 1+ and 2+ classifications). FISH testing was performed on 289 cases and 273 met inclusion criteria. The FISH-amplified rate was 12.1%. Upon IHC review, 44.7% (122/273) of cases were reclassified as Intermediate. These cases had incomplete staining with moderate intensity (43/122, 35.3%) and/or <10% complete weak or moderate staining (102/122, 83.6%). Intermediate cases had a significantly lower frequency of amplified FISH results than 2+ cases (p < 0.0001), with only four (3.3%) FISH positive and two (1.6%) FISH heterogeneous. Our study highlights the ambiguity in the current guideline for classifying some HER2 IHC patterns. As the rate of gene amplification in these cases was low (4.9%), we recommend adhering to the 2018 HER2 2+ criteria for reflex FISH testing. However, cases with <10% moderate complete staining and certain heterogeneous patterns warrant special consideration. Further descriptive clarification of 1+ criteria is needed.

Diagnosis of FOXG1 syndrome caused by recurrent balanced chromosomal rearrangements: case study and literature review

BackgroundThe FOXG1 gene plays a vital role in mammalian brain differentiation and development. Intra- and intergenic mutations resulting in loss of function or altered expression of the FOXG1 gene cause FOXG1 syndrome. The hallmarks of this syndrome are severe developmental delay with absent verbal language, post-natal growth restriction, post-natal microcephaly, and a recognizable movement disorder characterized by chorea and dystonia.Case presentationHere we describe a case of a 7-year-old male patient found to have a de novo balanced translocation between chromosome 3 at band 3q14.1 and chromosome 14 at band 14q12 via G-banding chromosome and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) analyses. This rearrangement disrupts the proximity of FOXG1 to a previously described smallest region of deletion overlap (SRO), likely resulting in haploinsufficiency.ConclusionsThis case adds to the growing body of literature implicating chromosomal structural variants in the manifestation of this disorder and highlights the vital role of cis-acting regulatory elements in the normal expression of this gene. Finally, we propose a protocol for reflex FISH analysis to improve diagnostic efficiency for patients with suspected FOXG1 syndrome.

Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) recently issued updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in invasive breast cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the new recommendations on HER2 FISH interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically (IHC) equivocal results. 1810 breast cancer cases with IHC equivocal results were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and May 2019. Concomitant IHC was performed on the same tissue blocks detected by FISH testing. According to the 2018 guidelines, all the cases in ISH group 2 were categorized as HER2 negative; three of four cases in ISH group 3 were considered as HER2 positive, while the one scored IHC 1+ was reclassified as HER2 negative; Fifty-three previously ISH equivocal cases were redistributed into ten HER2-positive cases and forty-three HER2-negative cases. In conclusion, the utility of 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines resulted in a slight decrease in HER2 positive rate, due to the reclassification of cases in ISH group 2 and group 4. The implementation of the new guidelines can reduce reflex FISH test and make the diagnosis of HER2 gene status more definitive.

HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor

PurposeHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is both an independent prognostic factor and a predictive factor for the efficacy of targeted therapy for breast cancer, so it is critical to accurately detect HER2 protein expression and/or gene amplification. According to the recommendations of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines for HER2 breast cancer testing, an additional test should be pursued on a different block from the same tumor as one of the options for patients with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ and a HER2/CEP17 ratio of < 2.0 with an average HER2 signals per tumor cell of ≥ 4.0 and < 6.0 by reflex test using dual-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (double-equivocal HER2). Our aim in this study is to explore the consistency of HER2 status between the two blocks.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 5685 primary invasive breast cancers between April 2015 and January 2019 from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. For cases with double-equivocal HER2 revealed in initial blocks, HER2 gene status was evaluated by FISH in a different block from the same tumor. The FISH score was interpreted according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing.ResultsIn our cohort of 5685 specimens, the overall HER2 IHC3+, 2+, 1+ and 0 cases were 20.5%, 31.8%, 28.3%, and 19.5%, respectively. Then, 13.7%, 66.3%, and 20.0% of HER2 amplification, non-amplification, and equivocation rates were found, respectively, in IHC2+ patients (n = 1777) by reflex FISH assay. For specimens with double-equivocal HER2 (n = 333), HER2 status was assessed in another block from the same tumor by FISH and then the frequency of HER2 positive, negative, and equivocation was estimated at 5.7%, 22.5%, and 71.8%, respectively. Because double-equivocal HER2 cases are classified in the HER2 negative category by the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines, only 1.3% (19/1511) of HER2 positive patients were determined through additional HER2 testing in another block from the HER2 negative population.ConclusionsHER2 status in different blocks from the same tumor in primary invasive breast cancer was highly concordant. Our data supported the recommendation of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer to remove the suggestion for additional HER2 testing using another block contained in the previous version.

Reassignment of HER2 status for subgroups of breast cancer according to the 2018 updated American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines: The impact of combined immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reflex testing in a large national reference laboratory.

3144 Background: Updated ASCO/CAP Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer have been most impactful on the resolution of certain challenging groups of FISH results. We review the change in assignment of HER2 status in a large series of breast cancers referred to a large national reference laboratory for FISH testing since the introduction of the 2018 updated guidelines. Methods: Patient samples submitted to the Mayo Clinic Cytogenetics Laboratory (N = 2208) were analyzed by FISH. Samples with Group 2, Group 3, or Group 4 FISH results were reflexed to immunohistochemistry (IHC) in our central laboratory; FISH slides for those cases with equivocal 2+ IHC results were re-scored in the regions of invasive cancer showing more intense membranous staining. A subset of 202 samples with Group 4 FISH results were also reflexed to the previously employed reflex FISH assay (HER2/D17S122), and these were also re-analyzed according to the new reflex IHC/FISH process. Results: 382 of 2208 breast cancer samples tested (17.3%) had FISH results categorized as Group 2 (N = 17, 0.8%), Group 3 (N = 34, 1.5%), or Group 4 (N = 331, 15%) and required reflex IHC testing, and of those, 75% were 2+ equivocal and required targeted re-analysis of the FISH slide according to the 2018 updated guidelines. Re-analysis of the FISH slide resulted in switching between Groups 1-5 in 19.4% of cases, but HER2 status was changed by FISH re-scoring in only 7.7% of cases re-scored (1.0% of all samples), generally due to only minor shifts in HER2 copy number and HER2/control ratios between the initial and IHC-guided reflex FISH scores. In the subset of 202 cases tested by both reflex methods, the previously employed HER2/D17S122 reflex probe set was positive in 123 cases (60.9%), whereas reflex IHC/FISH was positive in only 10 cases (7.9%). Including positive reflex IHC (0.4%) and positive reflex FISH results (2.1%), the overall assignment of positive HER2 status on our series of 2208 cases was 11.5%. Conclusions: Overall rates of HER2 positive FISH results have declined under the most recent ASCO/CAP guideline update as a consequence of new recommendations for reflex testing for Groups 2-4. This change is largely due to reassignment of Group 2 and Group 4 results as negative in the absence of positive IHC.

Integrated FISH, Karyotyping and aCGH Analyses for Effective Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies and Other Cytogenomic Abnormalities.

Current prenatal genetic evaluation showed a significantly increase in non-invasive screening and the reduction of invasive diagnostic procedures. To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy on detecting common aneuploidies, structural chromosomal rearrangements, and pathogenic copy number variants (pCNV), we performed a retrospective analysis on a case series initially analyzed by aneuvysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and karyotyping then followed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Of the 386 cases retrieved from the past decade, common aneuploidies were detected in 137 cases (35.5%), other chromosomal structural rearrangements were detected in four cases (1%), and pCNV were detected in five cases (1.3%). The relative frequencies for common aneuploidies suggested an under detection of sex chromosome aneuploidies. Approximately 9.5% of cases with common aneuploidies showed a mosaic pattern. Inconsistent results between FISH and karyotyping were noted in cases with pseudo-mosaicism introduced by culture artifact or variable cellular proliferation from cells with mosaic karyotypic complements under in vitro cell culture. Based on findings from this case series, cell-based FISH and karyotyping should be performed to detect common aneuploidies, structural chromosomal abnormalities, and mosaic pattern. DNA-based aCGH and reflex FISH should be performed to detect and confirm genomic imbalances and pCNV. Practice points to ensure the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy were summarized.

Double-Equivocal HER2 Invasive Breast Carcinomas: Institutional Experience and Review of Literature.

HER2 status is a prognostic factor and therapeutic target in invasive breast carcinomas. Reflex testing using an alternate method is recommended on equivocal cases via immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Therapeutic dilemmas arise when both tests are equivocal. The standard chromosome 17 centromere reference probe (CEP17) is in close proximity to the HER2 locus and may be coamplified, leading to equivocal results. Alternate chromosome 17 reference probes may aid in establishing the true HER2 status. To describe our institutional experience using D17S122 probe for reflex FISH testing on double-equivocal invasive breast carcinomas and review the literature on alternate reference probes. Twenty-two patients with double-equivocal invasive breast carcinomas, defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry score 2+ and FISH equivocal per the 2013 guidelines, were reviewed. Reflex FISH was performed with alternate probe D17S122 and the HER2 status classified for 11 cases by using a revised HER2: D17S122 ratio. Seven of 11 cases (63.6%) were ultimately classified as HER2 positive, while 4 cases (36.4%) remained equivocal. The 7 positive cases showed a HER2: D17S122 greater than 2.0. Alternate probe D17S122 reclassified more than half of our cases as HER2 positive. Alternate probes may establish true HER2 status and direct proper management, as evidenced by our experience and the literature. Additional investigation is needed to determine which alternate probe(s) is(are) best for reflex testing. Finally, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines may need to be updated to reflect more specific recommendations for the utilization of appropriate probes in double-equivocal HER2 cases.

First Successful Pregnancy After Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis by FISH for an Inversion Together with a Cryptic Translocation in India

AbstractThe technique of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in cases of repeated miscarriages due to parental balanced inversions and translocations is relatively new in India. In a couple with a history of recurrent miscarriages and implantation failures, karyotyping done in three laboratories showed that the husband had an insertion or inversion of chromosome 12. Hence, they were referred to us for PGD. The anomaly turned out to be more complex. A pre-PGD workup using a series of FISH probes on metaphases accompanied by reflex FISH was required to characterize the anomaly. For subsequent PGD, single blastomeres were biopsied from seven embryos obtained by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. FISH analysis had to be carried out using ten probes in four rounds. On pre-PGD workup for inversion 12 by FISH, an additional anomaly of a cryptic translocation between 9qter and 12qter was detected in the husband. His complex karyotype according to the detailed ISCN nomenclature was therefore 46,XY,t(9;12)(9pter→9q34.1::12q24.2→12qter),der(12)inv(12)(12pter→12p11.2::12q24.2→12p11.2::9q34.1→9qter). After PGD, the normal and balanced embryos transferred, resulted in the birth of healthy twins conceived in the first cycle itself. Therefore, a pre-PGD workup is important and needs reflex FISH in the event of an unexpected cytogenetic anomaly. PGD will need the analysis of additional chromosomes on the same cell by FISH in such cases. An experienced in vitro fertilization and Genetics team is essential for success. This is the first report of PGD by FISH for an inversion coupled with a cryptic translocation from India.

HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.

The status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, ERBB2) determines the eligibility of breast cancer patients to receive HER2-targeted therapy. The majority of HER2 testing in the U.S. is performed using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for IHC equivocal cases. In 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated the guideline for HER2 testing. This study evaluates the impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP updated guideline on final HER2 FISH classification of breast cancers with an equivocal IHC result. For each case, we reported a FISH result according to the 2013 updated guideline and recorded a separated result using the 2007 guideline for investigational purpose. McNemar's test and Bowker's symmetry test were used to compare the classifications by the two guidelines. Among 172 HER2 IHC 2+ equivocal cases, use of the 2103 guideline changed classifications in 36 cases (21%) when compared with the results expected by use of the 2007 guideline, and yielded a higher proportion of positive (28.5 vs. 23.3%) and equivocal (16.3 vs. 4.1%), and a lower proportion of negative (55.2 vs. 72.7%) cases (p<0.001). The major classification change with use of the updated guideline is from the HER2 FISH negative to equivocal in 26 cases (15%). Our study has shown that implementation of the 2013 ASCO/CAP updated guideline has significant impact on HER2 classification for breast cancers with an equivocal HER2 IHC result and therefore increased the use of HER2-targeted therapy. Our data have also shown that reflex FISH is effective for final classification of the IHC equivocal cases and that polysomy 17 (CEP17 copy number ≥3/cell) is present in a significantly higher proportion of cases with an equivocal HER2 FISH classification.

ALK Status Testing in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Correlation Between Ultrasensitive IHC and FISH

ALK gene rearrangements in advanced non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) are an indication for targeted therapy with crizotinib. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a recently approved companion in vitro diagnostic class FISH system commonly assesses ALK status. More accessible IHC is challenged by low expression of ALK-fusion transcripts in NSCLC. We compared ultrasensitive automated IHC with FISH for detecting ALK status on 318 FFPE and 40 matched ThinPrep specimens from 296 patients with advanced NSCLC. IHC was concordant with FFPE-FISH on 229 of 231 dual-informative samples (31 positive and 198 negative) and with ThinPrep-FISH on 34 of 34 samples (5 positive and 29 negative). Two cases with negative IHC and borderline-positive FFPE-FISH (15% and 18%, respectively) were reclassified as concordant based on negative matched ThinPrep-FISH and clinical data consistent with ALK-negative status. Overall, after including ThinPrep-FISH and amending the false-positive FFPE-FISH results, IHC demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.00 and 0.97 to 1.00, respectively) for ALK detection on 249 dual-informative NSCLC samples. IHC was informative on significantly more samples than FFPE-FISH, revealing additional ALK-positive cases. The high concordance with FISH warrants IHC's routine use as the initial component of an algorithmic approach to clinical ALK testing in NSCLC, followed by reflex FISH confirmation of IHC-positive cases.

20P Qrt-Pcr Based Determination of Her2 Status of Invasive Breast Carcinomas Equivocal by Both Immunohistochemistry (Ihc) and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (Fish) Testing

ABSTRACT Background Determination of HER2 status of invasive breast carcinoma is typically performed by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Equivocal results by either method are resolved by reflex testing using an alternative approved testing method; most commonly, IHC equivocal results are resolved by reflex FISH testing. Cases showing equivocal results by both IHC and FISH {double equivocal cases (DEC)} present a management challenge. Approach and methods Of 2145 breast cancers tested by primary FISH testing, 103 (4.8%) were equivocal (HER2/CEP17 ratio 1.8 - 2.2). Reflex IHC resolved all but 35 cases (1.6% DEC). HER2 expression in macrodissected tumor tissue was assessed for these cases by qRT-PCR. Trastuzumab therapy was tracked for all patients in the DEC population. Results qRT-PCR of macrodissected breast cancer tissue definitely correlated with known HER2 amplified/over-expression status in a validation set of 111 cases, and successfully stratified the DEC cases. Of the 7 patients identified as positive for HER2 over-expression by qRT-PCR, 1 case (14.3%) received Trastuzumab in addition to standard therapy. In the 19 cases identified as not over-expressed for HER2 by qRT-PCR, 6 cases (31.6%) received Trastuzumab. In this double equivocal cohort, 6 patients developed metastasis (2 that received Trastuzumab and 4 that did not receive Trastuzumab). The follow up time post Trastuzumab therapy ranged from 1 to 36 months with an average of 15.7 months. 7/26 DEC cases were classified as HER2 over-expressed by qRT-PCR and would have been eligible for Trastuzumab therapy. In actual practice, without a definitive test for HER2 determination, only 1 patient received Trastuzumab therapy. Therefore 6 of 7 patients did not receive potentially beneficial therapy. Conclusions qRT-PCR represents a quantitative alternative approach to resolution of breast cancers demonstrating equivocal results by both IHC and FISH. Limited follow up and small number of patients receiving Trastuzumab, we could not directly assess clinical utility. This will be an important question to be addressed in future studies. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

A Comparison of Equivocal Immunohistochemical Results With Anti-HER2/neu Antibodies A0485 and SP3 With Corresponding FISH Results in Routine Clinical Practice

HER2/neu status in breast cancer is determined by immunohistochemical analysis and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Previous studies have found widely varying sensitivities and specificities for anti-HER2/neu antibodies, including recently developed rabbit monoclonal antibodies. The current prospective study compared rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and rabbit polyclonal antibody A0485 immunostaining on routinely processed consecutive cases of breast carcinoma. Of 1,610 cases tested, 261 (16.2%) equivocal (2+) cases were evaluated by FISH. Of 253 cases equivocal with A0485 results, 125 (49.4%) were negative with SP3. In 22 (8.7%) of 253 cases equivocal with A0485, there was amplification by FISH, and 3 of these cases were SP3- (0/1+). Of the 20 (14.8%) of 135 SP3-equivocal cases amplified by FISH, 1 case was A0485-. The reported false-negative rate with A0485 is 2.8%, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines recommend a rate of less than 5%. Compared with A0485, the false-negative rate with SP3 is only 0.3% (3/1,156) higher, but it shows about a 50% reduction in equivocal scores, reducing the need for reflex FISH testing.

HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues

To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration—approved products. Procedures were standardized following the manufacturers' recommendations. Of 116,736 IHC specimens, 20% were positive for HER2. In 16,092 FISH specimens, 22.7% showed HER2 amplification. In the subset of 6556 tissues analyzed with IHC and FISH, however, 59% were positive on IHC and 23.6% were amplified on FISH. The increased frequency of positive test results is skewed by more frequent reflex FISH testing. In general, expression and amplification trended together, with the least amplification (4.1%) seen in IHC-negative cases, 7.4% amplification seen in IHC 1+ cases, 23.3% amplification seen in IHC 2+ cases, and 91.7% amplification seen in IHC 3+ cases. When FISH amplification ratios were stratified, the low FISH ratios (2.0-2.2) were most frequently seen in specimens with negative IHC results, high ratios (> 5.0) were seen in IHC 3+ specimens, and intermediate levels of amplification were similar for all levels of IHC. The effect of changing the cutoff point was analyzed: removing cases with a ratio of exactly 2.0 decreased the FISH positivity rate to 22.2% in the combined IHC and FISH cohort. Sequentially moving the cutoff point to 2.2 and 2.5 affected cases at all IHC expression levels. Each change removed approximately 2% from the apparent positivity. This large database provides the distribution frequency of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. The relationship between level of HER2 amplification and clinical outcome will require reanalysis of pivotal trial data.