Reference Formulation Research Articles

Within-subject pharmacokinetic variability has a strong influence on individual exposure ratios in bioequivalence studies, hence on drug formulation interchangeability.

Bioequivalence between a reference and a generic drug is based on the hypothesis that a ± 20% change in blood exposure (or ± 10% for drugs with narrow therapeutic index, NTI) following the generic/reference switch will not have any therapeutic consequences. However, the individual exposure ratio between generic and reference can be higher than 1.20 (or 1.10). This study aims to analyse the different parameters influencing the individual exposure ratio, hence the conditions for reference/generic interchangeability. Bioequivalence studies with a double cross-over design for a virtual drug were simulated using 100 random sets of 12, 24, 48 or 100 pairs of areas under the curve (AUC), varying the generic/reference AUC geometric mean ratios between 0.80 and 1.25 and the within-subject exposure variance of the reference and the generic formulations. The proportion of subjects with an exposure generic/reference ratio outside the ± 10% or ± 20% acceptance intervals increases when (1) the reference within-subject variance increases; (2) the ratio of the generic within-subject variance on the reference within-subject variance increases; and (3) the generic/reference mean AUC ratio diverges from 1.0. When only considering replicated administrations of the reference, the individual exposure ratio increases with the within-subject variance, yielding values outside the usually accepted individual exposure ratio range of 0.5 to 2 for drugs with narrow therapeutic index as soon as the within-subject variance standard deviation is ≥ 0.25 (equivalent to within-patient CV% > 25%). Interchangeability between reference and generic formulations, especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic index can only be assumed if, the within-subject variance of generic is less or equal to the within-subject variance of reference or, if this is not the case, if the distribution of the generic/generic individual exposure ratios is included within the therapeutic margins of the reference drug.

Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Study of Lisinopril/Hydrochlorothiazide Tablet Under Fasting and Postprandial Conditions in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and safety of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide (10mg/12.5mg) tablets in the test and reference formulations administered to participants in both fasting and postprandial states and to evaluate the bioequivalence of the 2 products in healthy Chinese volunteers. This study employed a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose dosing trial involving a cumulative 96 healthy adult participants (60 in the fasting group and 36 in the postprandial group). Each group comprised 2 sequence sets, and a 2-week washout period was implemented. There were no statistically significant differences in time to maximum concentration and terminal elimination half-life between the test and control groups under fasting and postprandial conditions (P >.05), and the 90% CIs for area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration were within the bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Pharmacokinetic results indicate a large food effect for lisinopril, meaning that there is a loss of approximately 20%-25% of systemic exposure from fasting to postprandial administration for both preparations. The study demonstrated that a single oral dose of generic lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide is bioequivalent to the reference product and well tolerated, with no significant adverse events observed, and that both products are similarly safe in a cohort of healthy Chinese male and female participants, following administration under fasting and postprandial conditions.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of highly variable valsartan in single-pill combination with amlodipine versus its generic formulation: a randomized, three-cycle, three-sequence, partially replicated crossover phase I bioequivalence clinical trial.

Valsartan/amlodipine (I) is a single-pill combination (SPC) of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and a calcium channel blocker (CCB) for treating hypertension. A clinical trial was performed to demonstrate that the test and reference valsartan/amlodipine formulations were bioequivalent under fasting and postprandial conditions. Participants were randomly divided into three sequences at a ratio of 1:1:1 for three-cycle, reference formulation replicated, crossover administration. The average bioequivalence (ABE) and reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) methods were used to evaluate BE using the main pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Overall, 45 eligible participants were enrolled in the postprandial trial, which was consistent with the fasting trial. For valsartan, the RSABE method was used to evaluate the BE of Cmax, while the ABE method was applied to evaluate the BE of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞. Both point estimates and 95% upper confidence bound met the BE criteria. For amlodipine, the ABE method was performed, and the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios (GMR) for Cmax and AUC0-72h were all within 80%-125%, with the BE criteria being met. Therefore, the two formulations are bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles in healthy Chinese subjects. Clinical trial registration: [http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html], identifier [CTR20210214].

Tuning pharmaceutically active zein-based formulations for additive manufacturing

Zein, a biopolymer from corn, was plasticized by glycerol and an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient-Ionic Liquid (API-IL) for its melt processing at 130 °C. In order to enhance the rheological properties of the formulation for 3D printing, the ratio of glycerol to API-IL was adjusted while maintaining a consistent addition of 20% plasticizer. A 50/50 ratio allowed obtaining an initial melt viscosity suitable for extrusion-based processes, at approximately 1 kPa.s at a shear rate of 10 s−1, with a shear thinning behavior. This viscosity remained stable during a processing window of about 6 min, before zein proteins start to aggregate, leading to an apparent gelation phenomenon for long residence times. The processability of this formulation containing API-IL for the printing of tablets for potential therapeutic applications was confirmed by tests on a 3D printer. Nonetheless, in comparison to a reference formulation containing only glycerol, the printing accuracy experienced a decrease. This was ascribed to slower viscous sintering kinetics in presence of API-IL, evidenced by monitoring fusion-bonding during dynamic X-ray tomography trials carried out at Synchrotron SOLEIL.

Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Once-a-Day Brimonidine Ophthalmic Nanosuspension.

Purpose: This article aims to describe a preclinical proof of concept for a novel once-a-day (OD) brimonidine ophthalmic nanosuspension. Methods: The preclinical proof of concept was established using New Zealand white rabbits as animal models. Dose-finding, multiple-dose efficacy, ocular pharmacokinetic, and hemodynamic studies were performed in normotensive rabbits. Steroid-induced ocular hypertension model in rabbits was used to study efficacy in glaucomatous pathophysiology. The test (0.35% OD suspension) and reference (0.15% three times a day [TID] solution) were compared. Results: The intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction was sustained for 0.35% and 0.5% strengths but not for other lower strengths tested or reference strengths. A 0.35% OD suspension reduced IOP >2 mmHg after 24 h of dosing, which was not seen with the reference. After multiple dosing, 0.35% OD suspension reduced IOP by 4-6 mmHg after 24 h, which was comparable to the 0.15% TID reference solution. An ocular pharmacokinetic study showed that the brimonidine was rapidly absorbed and distributed throughout the eye after topical administration. Concentration was higher in tissues with high α2 receptors, such as cornea-conjunctiva, iris/ciliary body, and choroid/retina. The steady-state concentrations in these organs were also significant after 24 h of the last dose. There was an indication of increased plasma levels, so a hemodynamic study was performed to assess any adverse effects. All hemodynamic parameters were normal and no new unusual safety findings were observed. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the novel brimonidine 0.35% ophthalmic nanosuspension is both safe and effective when administered OD and is comparable to the marketed reference formulation administered TID.

Bioequivalue of two mycophenolate sodium enteric-coated tablets and the drug monitoring based on limited sampling strategy: A single-center, randomized, open-label, three-period, reference-replicated, crossover study

ObjectiveA mycophenolate sodium enteric-coated tablet has shown a satisfying anti-rejection effect in patients receiving solid organ transplantation. The current study evaluated the bioequivalence between the test (Ruiyirong®) vs. reference (Myfortic®) formulations by exploring equations for predicting their area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) using a limited sampling strategy in healthy subjects. MethodsForty-eight healthy Chinese subjects were randomized into three administration sequences (test-reference-reference, reference-reference-test, and reference-test-reference) to receive the Ruiyirong or Myfortic treatment on days 1, 8, and 15. ResultsThe 90% confidential interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the AUC from time 0 to the last timepoint (AUC0–t), and the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞) was 92.90%–110.57%, 96.91%- 101.80%, and 96.71%–101.84%, respectively. All these values fell into the bioequivalence criteria of 80.00%–125.00% (based on the criteria of the Food and Drug Administration). The adverse events were 10.4% in Ruiyirong test group and 14.6% in Myfortic reference group. Eight equations for estimating the AUC of the Ruiyirong test and Myfortic reference formulations were evaluated; most of them worked well with the R-value >0.8. Among the four chosen equations, the intragroup verification exhibited a high agreement with the R-value ranging from 0.857 to 0.971 and with the low predictive error (PE > 5% with absolute PE > 15%). Meanwhile, the intergroup verification indicated a high inter-agreement with the R-value ranging from 0.896 to 0.974 (all P < 0.001). ConclusionThe Ruiyirong test vs. Myfortic reference formulations meet the bioequivalent criteria and are well tolerated. The further linear regression analysis explores eight equations predicting the AUC value and the chosen four equations for the Ruiyirong test and Mayfortic reference formulations are interchangeable.

A Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Fexuprazan 10 mg: Demonstrating Bioequivalence with the Reference Formulation and Evaluating Steady State.

Fexuprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker approved for treating gastric-acid-related diseases. Although the effectiveness of the recent formulation fexuprazan 10 mg has been demonstrated in Phase 3 clinical trials, data on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of administering fexuprazan 10 mg twice daily at a 12 h interval are lacking. Moreover, it is imperative to ensure the bioequivalence of the new formulation with the previously approved 40 mg formulation. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of the single- and multiple-dose oral administration of fexuprazan 10 mg tablets in healthy participants (Part 1) and investigated their bioequivalence with 40 mg tablets (Part 2). Part 1 comprised a single- and multiple-dose, one-sequence, two-period design and eight participants, while Part 2 comprised a single-dose, 2 × 2 crossover design and 24 participants. In Part 1, in Periods 1 and 2, participants received single and multiple doses (twice daily) of fexuprazan 10 mg, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12h) of the multiple-dose participants was approximately double that of the single-dose participants. In Part 2, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax and AUC from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of the use of four fexuprazan 10 mg tablets to those of one fexuprazan 40 mg tablet were 1.0290 (0.9352-1.1321) and 1.0290 (0.9476-1.1174), respectively, meeting the bioequivalence criteria. Favorable PKs were observed after single and multiple administrations of one fexuprazan 10 mg tablet, and four fexuprazan 10 mg tablets were pharmacokinetically equivalent to one fexuprazan 40 mg tablet.

Bootstrap Statistics and Its Application in Disintegration and Dissolution Data Analysis.

Disintegration time (DT) and rate of drug dissolution in different media are among the most widely studied crucial parameters for various types of drug products. In the ever-evolving landscape of generic formulation development, dissolution comparison of reference and test products is the major reliable in vitro method of establishing product similarity. This is one of the most widely accepted methods of proving pharma equivalency between two drug products. A well-studied match between the disintegration and dissolution profile of the test and reference formulations can ensure in vitro product similarity. Various statistical approaches have been employed to establish product performance similarity; among them, the similarity factor (f2) calculation based approach is the most widely accepted and explored method to date. However, the f2 statistics fail to predict the similarity of batches with unit-to-unit variability. Bootstrap statistical analysis of dissolution data between the test and reference products was introduced to overcome the problems associated with batches with unit variability. Bootstrap can also be applied to extract statistically significant results by treating a series of data from different batches, which can further help to understand the trend. The current review depicts different case study based approaches to show the applications of bootstrap statistics in disintegration and dissolution similarity evaluation for both conventional and additively manufactured solid dosage forms. It is concluded that bootstrap statistics can be a very promising and reliable data analytical tool for establishing in vitro product similarity for both conventional and additively manufactured formulations with a high level of intraunit variability.

Development of a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method for the determination of triamcinolone acetonide in human plasma and evaluation of its bioequivalence after a single intramuscular injection in healthy volunteers.

Introduction: Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is commonly used in the treatment of various inflammatory conditions. To ensure its efficacy and safety, it is important to accurately determine its concentration in human plasma and evaluate its bioequivalence. In this study, an efficient ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed for the quantification of TA in human plasma after a single intramuscular injection. The internal standard used in this method was cortisone acetate (CA). Methods: TA and CA were extracted from plasma using ethyl acetate and N-hexane (4:1, v/v), separated on a C18 reverse-phase column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile-water containing 1% formic acid (55:45, v/v), and analyzed by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Multiple-reaction monitoring was performed using the transitions m/z 435.4→397.3 for TA and m/z 403.4→163.1 for CA. Results: The developed UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method demonstrated linearity over a concentration range of 0.53-21.20ng/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 0.53ng/mL. The intra- and inter-run precision values ranged from 3.007% to 9.960% and 3.528% to 11.26%, respectively. The intra- and inter-run accuracy ranges were -1.962% to -6.577% and -3.371% to 0.348%, respectively. The matrix effect, extraction recovery, and stability of TA all met the acceptance criteria recommended by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for bioassays. In healthy volunteers who received a single intramuscular injection of 80mg of either the test or reference formulation of TA, various pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. C max was found to be 8.616 ± 1.232 and 8.285 ± 1.218ng/mL for the test and reference formulations, respectively. T max was approximately 1.833 ± 0.243 and 1.861 ± 0.230h. The t 1/2 was calculated to be 181.249 ± 78.585 and 201.782 ± 83.551h. AUC 0-720 was 835.642 ± 297.209 and 830.684 ± 331.168ngh/mL, AUC 0-∞ was 991.859 ± 355.939 and 1018.665 ± 420.769ngh/mL for the test and reference formulations, respectively. The average relative bioavailability of TA, determined using AUC 0-720, was 105.4 ± 26.9%. Bioequivalence was evaluated through variance analysis and a double unilateral test, and the 90% confidence intervals of AUC 0-720, C max, and AUC 0-∞ were 92.8%-113.4%, 99.1%-109.1%, and 89.7%-110.9%, respectively (all p > 0.05). Discussion: These results met the bioequivalence criteria set by the NMPA, indicating that the developed UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method accurately determined TA concentrations in the plasma of healthy Chinese volunteers and that the test and reference formulations exhibited bioequivalence in these individuals.

Bioequivalence of Two 6-Mercaptopurine Tablet Formulations in Healthy Fasting Chinese Volunteers.

The supply of branded 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is limited in China, necessitating the local production and clinical evaluation of generic alternatives. We evaluated the in vivo bioequivalence (BE) of a new generic mercaptopurine tablet (50mg) formulation by comparing peak plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) with a branded 6-MP formulation as the reference in 36 healthy fasting Chinese adults. The in vivo BE was evaluated by the average BE test. The safety parameters of the test and reference formulations were also evaluated. The geometric mean ratios for AUC over the dosing interval and AUC from time zero to infinity were 104% and 104%, respectively, of the reference values, while the point estimate of the geometric mean ratio for peak plasma concentration was 104% of the reference value. The test and reference formulations in this study were both deemed safe as only 23 Grade 1 adverse events were observed in 13 of 36 subjects. The test and reference formulations of 6-MP tablets meet the regulatory criteria for BE in healthy fasting Chinese adults.

Oxidation reaction kinetics of HTPB-boron carbide/polytetrafluoroethylene formulations as a solid fuel

A solid-fuel ramjet engine powered by boron carbide (B4C) can generate nearly the same amount of energy as boron. However, the inherent oxide layer on the B4C surface restricts the energy released during its oxidation. In this study, we examine the effect of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on the oxidation of B4C and the removal of the oxide layer during the oxidation reaction. The B4C/PTFE binary composite powder was prepared using a ball milling process at three different concentrations (5:20, 10:20, and 15:20). Hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) loaded with binary composite powder was manufactured by vacuum casting technique. The pure HTPB and HTPB/PTFE fuels were manufactured as reference formulations. The B4C/PTFE binary composite powder was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and high-resolution scanning electron microscope (HRSEM). The thermal oxidation characteristics of prepared fuel formulations were studied using the thermogravimetric technique. The kinetics of the oxidation reaction was studied using both isothermal and non-isothermal methods. The thermogravimetric curves showed that the oxidation reaction of HTPB-based fuel occurred in four steps. When B4C/PTFE binary composite powder is added to HTPB, it decomposes faster and at a higher rate. The decomposed fluorine species of PTFE significantly improved the oxidation reaction of composite powder and increased the energy release rate of B4C. The kinetic studies of oxidation suggested that the addition of B4C/PTFE binary composite powder into HTPB lowered the activation energy (Ea: S1 > S2 > S3 > S4 > S5) required to prompt the oxidation reaction. Based on thermal and kinetic results, a potential oxidation promotion mechanism of B4C/PTFE composite powder was proposed. The initial stages of B4C oxidation resulted in a glassy layer of B2O3 oxide forming at the interface of B4C and PTFE powder. As a result of the oxidation reaction between B4C/PTFE and O2, CF4, Trifluoroboron (BF3) and CO2 were generated. At high temperatures, the oxide shell ruptured, allowing the O2 to diffuse into the core of the B4C particle and releasing a large amount of heat energy.

Inactivation kinetics of benzalkonium chloride and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against a betacoronavirus and an alphacoronavirus

Hand hygiene is critical to lower the potential for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious agents by direct contact. When running water and soap are not available for hand hygiene, ethanol-based hand sanitizers are currently the recommended standard of care [1-3]. Though recently published data showed comparable invitro effectiveness of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-based and ethanol-based hand sanitizers against SARS-CoV-2 virus, a paucity of peer-reviewed data on the effectiveness of these formulations against other types of infective coronaviruses remains. This work assessed human coronavirus HCoV-229E (genus Alphacoronavirus) concurrently with SARS-CoV-2, Isolate USA-WA1/2020 (genus Betacoronavirus) to fill this gap. The test was conducted according to EN14476:2013-A2:2019 [EN14476] Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Virucidal Activity in the Medical Area [4]. Two BAK-based hand sanitizers, five ethanol-based hand sanitizers, and an 80% ethanol reference formulation were tested for antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at 15- and 30- second contact times. Both SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E were reduced by greater than 4.00-log10 within 15 seconds of contact. Virus decay constants (k) following first-order kinetics were similar for BAK and ethanol-based formulations against both test viruses. The SARS-CoV-2 results reported herein mirrored previous data reported by Herdt etal. (2021). BAK and ethanol hand sanitizer formulations inactivate SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E at similar rates. This data supports previously published effectiveness data for both chemistries and indicates that additional coronavirus strains and variants would demonstrate similar inactivation trends.

Methylphenidate Multiphasic Release Tablet: Bioequivalence Assessment between Two Formulations Administered under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

Methylphenidate hydrochloride is used to treat children, adolescents, and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Multiphasic release formulation has been used to control drug levels, mainly during children's school period. This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release tablets to meet regulatory requirements for registration in Brazil. Two independent studies (under fasting and fed conditions) designed as open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover trials were conducted in healthy subjects of both genders. Subjects were enrolled and randomly received a single dose of the test formulation methylphenidate hydrochloride 54 mg extended-release tablet (Consiv®, Adium S.A., São Paulo, Brazil) or the reference formulation (Concerta®, Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltd., São Paulo, Brazil), in each period, with a 7-day washout interval. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 h post dose and methylphenidate plasma concentrations were obtained using a validated LC-MS/MS method. A total of 96 healthy subjects were enrolled in the fasting study, of which 80 completed the study. For the fed study, 52 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 46 subjects completed it. In both studies, 90% confidence intervals for Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and partial AUCs were within the acceptable limits of 80.00 to 125.00%. Thus, according to regulatory requirements, the test formulation (Consiv®) was considered to be bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Concerta®) in both conditions (fasting and fed) and, therefore, it can be considered interchangeable in clinical practice. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated in single-dose administration.

Novel Bioequivalent Tablet of Solifenacin Succinate Prepared Using Direct Compression Technique for Improved Chemical Stability.

We designed a bioequivalent tablet form of solifenacin succinate (SOL) with an improved storage stability using a direct compression (DC) technique. An optimal direct compressed tablet (DCT) containing an active substance (10 mg), lactose monohydrate, and silicified microcrystalline cellulose as diluents, crospovidone as a disintegrant, and hydrophilic fumed silica as an anti-coning agent was constructed by evaluating the drug content uniformity, mechanical properties, and in vitro dissolution. The physicochemical and mechanical properties of the DCT were as follows: drug content 100.1 ± 0.7%, disintegration time of 6.7 min, over 95% release within 30 min in dissolution media (pH 1.2, 4.0, 6.8, and distilled water), hardness > 107.8 N, and friability ~0.11%. The SOL-loaded tablet fabricated via DC showed an improved stability at 40 °C and RH 75%, exhibiting markedly reduced degradation products compared to those fabricated using ethanol or water-based wet granulation or a marketed product (Vesicare®, Astellas Pharma). Moreover, in a bioequivalence study in healthy subjects (n = 24), the optimized DCT offered a pharmacokinetic profile comparable to that of the marketed product, with no statistical differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of the test to the reference formulation for the area under the curve and the maximum drug concentration in plasma were 0.98-1.05 and 0.98-1.07, respectively, and satisfied the FDA regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Thus, we conclude that DCT is a beneficial oral dosage form of SOL with an improved chemical stability.

Bioequivalence Study of Miglitol Orally Disintegrating Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting Condition Based on Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Parameters.

To investigate the bioequivalence of miglitol orally disintegrating tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers based on pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Additionally, the safety profile was estimated. Two randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover trials were conducted under fasting conditions. In the PD trial (CTR20191811), 45 healthy volunteers were randomly divided into 3 groups in a 1:1:1 ratio and administered sucrose alone or coadministered with 50mg of miglitol orally disintegrating tablet test or reference formulation/sucrose. In the PK trial (CTR20191696), 24 healthy volunteers were randomized (1:1) to receive the test or reference formulation (50mg). Blood samples were collected at 15 and 17 sampling points per cycle in the PD and PK trials, respectively. Plasma miglitol and serum glucose concentrations were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Serum insulin concentrations were measured using electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. Statistical analyses for the PD and PK parameters were subsequently performed. The volunteers' physical indicators were monitored and documented during the entire study to estimate drug safety. The PD and PK parameters of the two formulations were similar. The main PD and PK end points were both within the prespecified range of 80%-125%. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related TEAEs were similar between the test and reference formulation groups, and no serious TEAEs or deaths occurred during the 2 trials. These 2 formulations were demonstrated to be bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting condition.

Pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety studies of gefitinib tablet formulations: A randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover study in Chinese healthy volunteers

A randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover study was carried out for evaluating the bioequivalence of test (T) and reference (R) formulation of gefitinib in healthy Chinese volunteers. A total of eighty subjects were enrolled and randomized into two sequence groups. All subjects were orally administered of T or R formulation at a dose of 250 mg. The plasma samples were obtained at before and after administration until 168 h post-dose, and the drug concentrations were analyzed using validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratios were all within the range of 0.80–1.25 under fasting and fed conditions. As for the safety of both formulations, no serious or unexpected adverse events occurred during the study. Overall, the T formulation was bioequivalent with R formulation under fasting and fed conditions.

Pharmacokinetics of Nifedipine-Sustained Release Tablets in Healthy Subjects After a Single Oral Administration: Bioequivalence Analysis and Food Effects.

We compared newly developed delayed-release oral tablets (test) of 30-mg nifedipine (NFP) with its marketed counterpart (30mg; reference) in healthy adult Chinese volunteers to assess the former's bioequivalence. This was a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover trial study including fasting and fed trials. The participantswere randomly administered test or reference formulations (1:1 ratio) throughout each period, with a 7-day washout period. In the next session, they were administered the alternate products. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and WinNonlin software were used to evaluate the bioequivalence of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of NFP and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). In total, 46 and 48 people participated in the fasting and postprandial trials. In both groups, the 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of Cmax , AUC from time zero to time t, and AUC from time zero to infinity were in the equivalence range (80%-125%). When NFP was administered concomitantly with a high-fat meal, time to maximum concentration was approximately twofold earlier, absorption was approximately 4.8% less, and Cmax exhibited a slight change relative to those under fasting conditions. Moreover, no serious adverse events were recorded in the participants. The present findings confirm the bioequivalence of test and reference formulations of NFP tablets under fasting and postprandial conditions.

The Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Desvenlafaxine Succinate in Chinese Healthy Subjects Under Fasting and Fed States.

Desvenlafaxine succinate is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of major depressive disorder. The pharmacokinetic profile of desvenlafaxine succinate at the clinically recommended dose of 50mg in Chinese healthy subjects has been reported rarely. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of desvenlafaxine succinate in Chinese healthy subjects. A single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study with a 7-day washout period was conducted. A total of 88 individuals were incorporated to show bioequivalence of a generic and a reference drug, with 48 individuals in the fasting state and 40 receiving a high-fat diet. Finally, 46 and 38 individuals completed the fasting and the fed study, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals of the adjusted geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity all fell in the bioequivalent interval of 80%-125% in both the fasting and fed states. A total of 33 adverse events were reported, and all were mild or moderate in severity. In summary, the generic and reference formulations were bioequivalent, with no observable safety differences in the fasting/fed state.

Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, and Safety Evaluation of 2 Formulations of 10-mg Rivaroxaban Tablets: A 4-Period Crossover Trial.

This study compared the safety, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic properties of 2 formulations of 10-mg rivaroxaban tablets in healthy Chinese participants in fasting and fed arms. The trial was an open, randomized, 4-period, replicated crossover scheme, and 36 volunteers were recruited separately for the fasting and fed arms. Volunteers were randomly administered a single dose of the test or reference formulation (10mg) orally, followed by a 5-day washout period. Rivaroxaban concentrations in the plasma were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained from the concentration-time profiles. The mean values of the test and the reference product for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, and maximum plasma concentration were 996 and 1014 ng • h/mL, 1024 and 1055 ng • h/mL, and 150 and 152ng/mL in the fasting arm, respectively; the values were 1155 and 1167 ng • h/mL, 1160 and 1172 ng • h/mL, and 202 and 193ng/mL in the fed arm, respectively. All the parameters were within acceptable limits in terms of bioequivalence. No serious adverse events were observed. This study demonstrated that the 2 rivaroxaban tablets were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablets 20mg in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions.

Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety properties between a new generic and a brand reference formulation of esomeprazole enteric-coated tablets 20mg in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. Methods: The fasting study was an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study conducted in 32 healthy Chinese volunteers, and the fed study was a four-period crossover study conducted in 40 healthy Chinese volunteers. Blood samples were collected at the specified time points and determined to obtain the plasma concentrations of esomeprazole. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the non-compartment method. Bioequivalence was analyzed by the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the two formulations was assessed. Results: The fasting and fed study showed that the pharmacokinetics of the two formulations was similar. Under the fasting condition, the 90% CIs of GMRs of the test-to-reference formulation were 87.92%-104.36% for Cmax, 87.82%-101.45% for AUC0-t, and 87.99%-101.54% for AUC0-∞; under the fed condition, the 90% CIs of GMRs of the test-to-reference formulation were 80.53%-94.95% for Cmax, 87.46%-97.26% for AUC0-t, and 87.46%-97.16% for AUC0-∞. The 90% CIs of GMRs fall within the bioequivalence range of 80.00%-125.00%. The two formulations had good safety and were well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: According to relevant regulatory standards, esomeprazole enteric-coated generic and reference products exhibited bioequivalence and good safety in healthy Chinese subjects. Clinical Trials Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier CTR20171347 and CTR20171484.